• No results found

Information Security and Risk Management

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Information Security and Risk Management"

Copied!
28
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)
(2)

Information Security

 Industry Standards and COBIT Framework

 Relation to COSO Internal Control

Risk Management

 IT and Security Concepts

 COBIT and COSO Perspectives

Monitoring

 Procedural and Technical

(3)

Some Industry Standards

 International Standards Organization (ISO) 27000 Series

Information Security Forum (ISF) – Standard of

Good Practice for Information Security

 National Institutes of Standards and Technology (NIST)

 Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS)

(4)

ISACA defines information security as something

that:

Ensures that within the enterprise, information is protected against disclosure to unauthorized users (confidentiality), improper modification (integrity), and non-access when required (availability).

(5)

Extended view of COBIT 5

 Explains each component from information security perspective

 Provides:

 Guidance on drivers and benefits

 Principles from an information security perspective

 Enablers for support

 Alignment with standards

(6)

COBIT 5 for Information Security

Information Security Principles

Information Security Policy Specific Information Security Policies

(7)

Information Security Principles

 Support The Business

 Defend the Business

 Promote Responsible Information Security Behavior

Information Security Policy Scope – including:

 A definition for the enterprise

 Responsibilities

 Vision, with appropriate goals and metrics

(8)

Policy Driven by Information Security

 Access Control

 Personnel Information Security Policy

 Physical and Environmental Information Security Policy

Policy Driven by the Enterprise – including:

 Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery

 Acceptable Use

 Communication and Operations

 Risk Management

(9)

Control Environment

 Principal 1: The organization demonstrates a commitment to integrity and ethical values

 Principal 3: Management establishes, with board oversight, structures, reporting lines, and

appropriate authorities and responsibilities in the pursuit of objectives

 Principal 5: The organization holds individuals accountable for their internal control

responsibilities in the pursuit of objectives

(10)

Risk Assessment

 Principal 6: Identifies and analyzes risk

 Principal 9: Identifies and analyzes change

Control Activities

 Principal 12: Deploys policies and procedures

Monitoring Activities

 Principal 16: Conducts evaluations

(11)

PCI DSS 3.0 Requirements

(12)

COBIT 5 Enabling Processes

(13)

Example Mapping

(14)
(15)

Top 5 Threat Actions

1) Use of Stolen Credentials (hack) 2) Export Data (malware)

3) Phishing (social engineering)

4) Ram Scraper (malware)

5) Backdoor (malware)

(16)

Top 5 Breach Incident Methods

1) 35% Web App Attacks

2) 22% Cyber-espionage

3) 14% POS Intrusions

4) 9% Card Skimmers

5) 8% Insider Misuse

(17)

Have you assessed the risk of your IT environment?

For example, your Internal Controls may prevent an

employee from creating fraudulent checks, but...

Is your (or your customer’s) information being siphoned

off the network?

(18)

The Goal of an IT Risk Assessment

 Define threats and potential threats (internal or external)

 Identify areas that are not adequately protected

 Identify areas that do not meet regulatory requirements (compliance)

 Understand the security impact of new technologies

(19)

Identify Threats and Vulnerabilities

Risk Management (cont.)

Critical Asset Known Threats Vulnerabilities

Information, Server, Website

Cyber attack, DDOS attack, Staff errors

(20)

Rank the risk to each asset

Likelihood or Probability – How likely is the threat to

occur? Or how likely is the vulnerability to be exploited?

Severity or Impact – What would be the cost to the

business? Consider downtime, brand name, cost of recovery, and cost of penalties.

(21)

One way to rank risks (time for some math)

Probability (%) =

Likelihood of threat occurring and being successful (Threat + Vulnerability)

Impact (1-5, where 5 is highest impact) = Actual or anticipated cost to the business

(22)
(23)

Remember the threats from earlier?

98% of all attacks lead to a compromise in LESS THAN

1 DAY!

Only 25% of all companies detected the compromise in

less than 1 day

*

Median days to discovery – 229 DAYS

!

(24)

COSO Monitoring and COBIT 5

Monitoring

16

The organization selects, develops, and performs ongoing and/or separate evaluations to ascertain whether the components of internal control are present and functioning.

MEA02

The COBIT 5 Processes enabler guidance specifically addresses monitoring, evaluation and assessment of internal control adequacy (COBIT 5 process MEA02 Monitor, evaluate and assess the system

of internal control).

17

The organization evaluates and

communicates internal control deficiencies in a timely manner to those parties

responsible for taking corrective action, including senior management and the board of directors, as appropriate.

EDM05 MEA02

In addition to MEA02, COBIT 5 process EDM05 Ensure stakeholder transparency includes practices and

activities to evaluate, direct and monitor stakeholder reporting and communication requirements, including those related to control deficiencies, to senior

(25)

Network Monitoring

It is necessary to understand your network

 “If you do not know what is on your network, you cannot

defend it effectively. If you do not know how devices on your network are configured and set up, you cannot know how to protect and secure them.”

--Dr. Eric Cole, recent inductee to the Infosecurity Europe Hall of Fame

(26)

Don’t forget to look inside

There’s a whole network behind your firewall

Monitoring – Network Activity

(27)

Look inside your network to discover

Malicious software, trojan horses, spam-bots, etc.

All “phone home” to a command and control (C2)

system

Watch your outgoing traffic, not just incoming

(28)

References

Related documents

Critics may point to the stagflaticn that Japan faced after appl/ng Keynesian fiscal policy as a counter- argumenttothe above example. After all, in this case,

Finally, the presented interaction proteome uncovered a large set of interactions with proteins genetically linked to a range of human diseases, including cancer, suggesting

Nonetheless, in societies where the private sector forms a major source of group inequality in jobs, incomes and assets, horizontal inequality in this sector could be conducive

The purpose of this paper is to contribute to the understanding of the gender gap in investor behavior by taking a behavioral perspective and, specifically, resting on the concept of

Senior Manager 1 of University X stated: ‘Through online education [we] offer access on the continent where higher education par- ticipation is even lower than in South Africa,

employees do have professional contacts within their social net- work, before sharing a comment, post, picture, or video through any type of social media or

MGT of America performed an annual inspection for compliance with the ICE National Detention Standards (NOS) at the Central Texas Detention Facility (CTDF) located in San

of citizenship, this constitution, which was the last one to make the distinction between the concepts of citizen and national, finally recognized universal access to