• No results found

Portfolio Advisory Group

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Portfolio Advisory Group"

Copied!
12
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Portfolio

Advisory Group

European NPL Barometer

www.pwc.com/financialservices

(2)

1 Portfolio Advisory Group

The PwC NPL Barometer

The abundant availability of credit in Europe over the past decade fuelled a significant increase in lending across all asset classes and eventually led to the financial crisis and with the collapse of Lehman Brothers in September 2008.

As a result of the financial crisis, a number of European governments are currently undertaking significant austerity measures, in their efforts to eliminate their budget deficits. There has been extensive coverage of the Greek and Irish Government bailouts along with the recent application by the Portuguese Government for financial assistance by the International Monetary Fund (“IMF”) and the European Commission. With Portugal now seeking funding there is further uncertainty over European financial stability.

The number of non performing loans (“NPLs”) has increased significantly, as the ability of both consumers and corporates to repay their debts has been hampered. This has however been tempered, to an extent, by the effects of a generally low interest rate environment.

(3)

The PwC NPL Barometer

The PwC NPL Barometer is an analysis of the level of NPLs and provisions across key Western European financial markets. Our analysis covers

approximately 75 % of banks in these markets and uses this as an estimate for the total European market. It is based on publicly available financial data from the following markets (total of 43 banks):

Belgium • Germany • Ireland • Italy • Portugal • Spain • United Kingdom •

The objective of our analysis is to identify key trends in NPLs and provision coverage across each of the countries within our scope.

The definition of reported NPLs varies by bank and region. We have •

selected the most appropriate data available in each region. The

NPL ratio represents reported NPLs over standardised gross loans.

The

provision coverage ratio represents the reported allowance for

loan losses for all loans over gross reported NPLs.

Standardised gross loans

includes, loans to banks, loans given to

customers and financial leases. It excludes loans held for sale.

Our analysis is intended to give a broad picture of the key market trends across major European countries.

It does not take into account those loans that may have been modified •

or restructured and hence may not need to be classified as an NPL from an accounting perspective. Inclusion of these loans may increase the size of NPL volume further.

Data for international banks has been consolidated in the country of •

origin. Therefore subsidiary bank data is included in the consolidated statements of the parent.

All data is shown in Euros and where applicable has been converted at •

historic rates.

Government institutions and national banks have been excluded from •

this analysis.

(4)

3 Portfolio Advisory Group

What does the NPL Barometer mean?

Our NPL Barometer plots the provision coverage ratio against the NPL ratio for a particular region. Depending on the level of NPLs and provision coverage, a region will sit in a certain quadrant of the chart.

The chart opposite presents an illustrative overview of the quadrants: Quadrant A – low level of NPLs which are relatively well

provisioned for;

Quadrant B – high levels of NPLs which are relatively well •

provisioned for;

Quadrant C – low level of NPLs which may not be relatively well •

provisioned for; and

Quadrant D – high levels of NPLs which may not be relatively well •

provisioned for.

For the purpose of this analysis we define ‘low NPLs’ as anything less than 5% of total loans. We consider provision coverage greater than 50% to be ‘well provisioned’.

The NPL Barometer over time analyses the key movements to identify how the growth or decline in NPLs compares to the provision

coverage ratio. 1. NPL Barometer quadrants

A

High NPL ratio Pr

ovision coverage ratio

50% Low Low 5% High

C

B

D

(5)

Europe 30 Jun 2010 Europe 31 Dec 2007 €160bn €508bn 0% 50% 100% 150% 0% 5% 10% 15% P ro vi si on c o ve ra g e ra ti o NPL ratio

The European NPL landscape – then and now

In scope NPLs in our country analysis stood at over €160bn in 2007. The comparative at June 2010 figure is now estimated at over €500bn which represents an increase of over 200% compared to 2007.

Prior to the financial crisis NPLs in 2007 represented 2% of total lending and provision coverage stood at 84%.

By June 2010, NPLs stood at approximately 5% of total lending. The provisioning coverage fell to 50% at December 2007 (a 40% reduction since 2007).

This implies that even though NPLs have more than doubled since 2007, provisions have not increased at the same rate.

European banking profitability may remain under pressure even after NPLs have peaked (expected to be 2010 – 2011 for most markets) as the current level of provisioning has not increased at the same rate as the growth in NPLs.

* Representing approximately 75% of the European market

(6)

5 Portfolio Advisory Group Italy Spain UK Belgium Portugal UK 0% 50% 100% 150% 200% 250% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% P ro vi si o n c o ve ra g e ra ti o NPL ratio Germany Ireland Ireland Italy UK Germany Spain Belgium 0% 50% 100% 150% 200% 250% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% P ro vi si o n c o ve ra g e ra ti o NPL ratio Portugal

Since the crisis the trend is a shift towards the bottom

of Quadrant C and Quadrant D

4. European NPL Barometer – 2010 by region 3. European NPL Barometer – 2007 by region

(7)

Since 2007 the general trend has been one of increasing NPL ratios but with a relatively lower provision coverage ratio.

There has been a consistent movement in all major markets (with the exception of Portugal) toward the bottom right of Quadrant C or even Quadrant D.

Ireland shows the most extreme movement moving to Quadrant D with a Irish NPLs increasing from 1% in 2007 to 20% in 2010. The implication for Ireland is that with a relatively low provision coverage ratio and a need to deleverage, there could be significant pressure on profitability going forward.

Spain has moved from Quadrant A in 2007 to Quadrant C in 2010, highlighting the previous Banco de Espana policy that required banks to increase their provisions even as the level of NPLs remained stable. While regulation has changed in Spain requiring banks to provision against delinquent loans over a shorter period, this has been offset by the sharp increase in NPLs which has pushed Spain into Quadrant C.

The German and UK markets, the largest in Europe, have seen similar movements to the bottom right of Quadrant C, highlighting that NPL levels have increased faster than provisioning levels.

Our data suggests that Portugal is one of the few markets in Europe where NPLs have remained relatively stable over the 2007 to 2010 period. However, this partly reflects that Portugal has not experienced a property bubble to the same extent of other European neighbours. At the same time we understand there is also significant loan restructuring

and modifications occurring, which have reclassified NPLs into performing loans.

The Irish NPL ratio has seen the largest shift

over this period

(8)

7 Portfolio Advisory Group

Appendix

Regional breakdown

(9)

31 Dec 2007 30 Jun 2010 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 0% 5% 10% P ro vi si on c o ve ra ge r at io NPL ratio

Regional breakdown

5. The United Kingdom 2007 – 2010

31 Dec 2007 30 Jun 2010 0% 50% 100% 150% 200% 250% 0% 5% 10% P ro vi si on c o ve ra g e ra ti o 8. Spain 2007 – 2010 P ro vi si on c ov er ag e ra ti o NPL ratio 31 Dec 2007 30 Jun 2010 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 0% 5% 10% 6. Germany 2007 – 2010 31 Dec 2007 30 Jun 2010 40% 60% 80% 100% 120% 140% 0% 5% 10% P ro vi si o n co ve ra ge r at io 7. Italy 2007 – 2010

(10)

9 Portfolio Advisory Group

Regional breakdown

31 Dec 2007 30 Jun 2010 40% 60% 80% 100% 120% 0% 2% 4% P ro vi si o n co ve ra ge r at io NPL ratio 11. Belgium 2007 – 2010 31 Dec 2007 30 Jun 2010 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% P ro vi si on c ov er ag e ra tio NPL ratio 9. Ireland 2007 – 2010 31 Dec 2007 30 Jun 2010 0% 50% 100% 150% 200% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% P ro vi si on c o ve ra ge r at io NPL ratio 10. Portugal 2007 – 2010

(11)
(12)

Central Team Richard Thompson +44 20 7213 1185 [email protected] Jaime Bergaz +34 915 684 589 [email protected] Jens Roennberg +49 69 9585 2226 [email protected] Antonella Pagano +39 8064 6337 [email protected] Robert Boulding +44 20 7804 5236 [email protected]

Czech Republic and Slovakia

Petr Smutny +420 251 151 215 [email protected] Denmark Bent Jørgensen +45 3945 9259 [email protected] France Chuck Evans +33 1 56 57 85 23 [email protected]

Germany and Austria

Jens Roennberg +49 69 9585 2226 [email protected] Greece Emil Yiannopoulos +30 21 0687 4640 [email protected] Hungary Miklos Fekete 36 1461 9242 [email protected] Ireland Aidan Walsh +353 1 792 6255 [email protected] Italy Antonella Pagano +39 8064 6337 [email protected] Poland Janusz Sekowski +482 2 523 4476 [email protected] Portugal Luis Boquinhas +35 12 1359 9239 [email protected] Romania Marius Zidaru +40 212 253 930 [email protected] Russia Tim Nicolle +74 952 325 589 [email protected]

Slovenia and Croatia

Philippe Bozier +38 615 836 068 [email protected] Spain Jaime Bergaz +34 915 684 589 [email protected] Sweden Per Storbacka +46 85 553 3132 [email protected] Turkey Orhan Cem [email protected] +90 21 2376 5320 United Kingdom Robert Boulding +44 20 7804 5236 [email protected] Asia Pacific Michael McCreadie +61 38 603 3083 [email protected] Latin America Marcia Yagui +55 11 3674 3748 [email protected] Middle East Ian Schneider +971 430 43122 [email protected]

This publication has been prepared for general guidance on matters of interest only, and does not constitute professional advice. You should not act upon the information contained in this publication without obtaining specific professional advice. No representation or warranty (express or implied) is given as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in this publication, and, to the extent permitted by law, PricewaterhouseCoopers does not accept or assume any liability, responsibility or duty of care for any consequences of you or anyone else acting, or refraining to act, in reliance on the information contained in this publication or for any decision based on it.

© 2011 PwC. All rights reserved. Not for further distribution without the permission of PwC. “PwC” refers to the network of member firms of PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited (PwCIL), or, as the context requires, individual member firms of the PwC network. Each member firm is a separate legal entity and does not act as agent of PwCIL or any other member firm. PwCIL does not provide any services to clients. PwCIL is not responsible or liable for the acts or omissions of any of its member firms nor can it control the exercise of their professional judgment or bind them in any way. No member firm is responsible or liable for the acts or omissions of any other member firm nor can it control the exercise of another member firm’s professional judgment or bind another member firm or PwCIL in any way.

Design: ML3-2011-04-07-1008-EP

European and global contacts

Across Europe and the UK, the PwC network of firms has experienced partners and directors to assist you with your non-core asset and NPL related needs. Through this group both buyers and sellers of non-core assets and NPLs can receive consistent and seamless service across the world,

References

Related documents

139 MP A MAXIMUM STRESS. V ALIDATION OF PREDICTED FATIGUE MODULUS AGAINST MEASURED FATIGUE MODULUS FROM FATIGUE TESTING OF A QI EPOXY / E- GLASS LAMINATE AT 219 MP A

Commentator: Kenneth Karst, UCLA General Discussion – 3:15-4:00 pm Moderator: Laurent Mayali, UC Berkeley.. Opening comments: Yasuhei Taniguchi, World Trade Organization

Monitoring the dynamic changes in viscoelasticity during heating and cooling of the cheese in the tem- perature range 25 to 90°C enables the calculation of several parameters that

CRM Practice Strategy and Vision: Gartner analysts consider the CRM service provider's point of view on the evolution of service offerings and its corporate commitment to align

Occupational therapy professionals are providers who have the opportunity to prevent such avoidable events through the care and education of their clients and caregivers related

In this paper we relax all these assumptions and, given a set of 3D and 2D unmatched points, we present an approach to simultaneously solve their correspondences, compute the

XVIII Figure 4.2: Maps showing the distribution of GCPs collected using GNSS at (a.) Flowers Barrow and (b.) Eggardon Hillfort (© Crown Copyright/database right 2014. An

The emergence of a new economic crisis (oil crisis, external debt crisis) in the beginning of the 80s, on one hand, and the pressure for democratization, on the other hand,