Administration
Tina H. McCoy, Ed. D.
Interim Superintendent
Kori Becht
Director of Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment
Adam Steel
Director of Business, Finance, and Operations
Kenneth Duesing
Director of Special Services
Amina Fazlic
Director of Human Resources
John Pratte
Director of Facilities
Kevin Verratti
Director of Technology
February 5, 2016 7:00 PM
Windham High School Auditorium www.windhamsd.org
School Board Members Ken Eyring – Chair
Tom Murray – Vice Chair Dennis Senibaldi
Rob Breton
Daniel Popovici-Muller
District Officers
Moderator – Betty Dunn Clerk – Mary Ann Horaj
Treasurer – Anne-Marie O’Neil
DELIBERATIVE SESSION VOTERS GUIDE
WSD FY17 Budget
Version 3.0 –Deliberative Session Version – 2/5/2015 Page 2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
FISCAL YEAR 2017
Introduction ... 4
Two-Part Voting Procedure ... 4
Voting is a Two-Step Process ... 4
School Administrative Unit #95 ... 5
Schools ... 6
Academic Achievement and Programming ... 7
Advanced Placement Test Scores ... 8
Highest Degree Earned by Teaching Staff ... 8
Extended Learning Opportunities (ELO) ... 9
College Acceptances Class of 2015 ... 10
Windham School Board ... 11
Windham District Level Administration ... 12
Budget Preparation Process ... 13
Budget Process with Required Forms ... 14
Fiscal Year 2017 Warrant ... 15
Introduction... 15
Pro Forma Tax Rate Calculation ... 16
Article 1: Election of Officers ... 19
Article 2: GBS & WMS Construction Project ... 20
Discussion ... 20
Project Design... 21
Article 3: Petition Article for Track & Turf At WHS ... 26
Article 4: CIP Article for Future Building Projects ... 27
Discussion ... 27
ARticle 5: CBA With Teachers Union ... 28
Article 6: Special Meeting Authorization ... 28
Discussion ... 28
Article 7: Capital Needs Assessment Contribution ... 29
Article 8: Operating Budget ... 31
Discussion ... 31
WSD FY17 Budget
Version 3.0 –Deliberative Session Version – 2/5/2015 Page 3
Budget Executive Summary ... 32
Enrollment Projections ... 33
Historical Enrollment ... 33
Projections for FY17 ... 34
Future Enrollment Projections ... 35
General Fund Trend ... 36
High Level Summary of Operating Budget ... 37
Budget By Categories ... 38
Budget Composition ... 39
New or Expanded Positions ... 40
Non-Union Salary Pool ... 44
Future Budgetary Considerations ... 45
Budget Account Description ... 46
WSD FY17 Budget
Version 3.0 –Deliberative Session Version – 2/5/2015 Page 4
INTRODUCTION
TWO-PART VOTING PROCEDURE
“Senate Bill 2” official voting procedure is in effect for the Windham School District.
Voting to amend Windham School District warrant articles, along with discussion about the warrant articles, takes place at the Deliberative Session on Friday, February 5, 2016. Final ballot voting to adopt the articles, as amended at the Deliberative Session, takes place at the polls on election day- Tuesday, March 8, 2016.
VOTING IS A TWO-STEP PROCESS Step 1: Deliberative Session
Friday, February 5, 2016 7:00 PM
Windham High School Auditorium
Step 2: Ballot Voting Tuesday, March 8, 2016 7:00 AM- 8:00 PM
Windham High School Gymnasium
In many ways, the Deliberative Session resembles District Meetings of years past with one fundamental difference: discussion and voting at this meeting will focus on the wording of the questions to be placed on the March 8th ballot, not on voting to approve the budget, bonds, or other warrant articles. The wording of a warrant article can be amended to change the dollar amount or some specific parts of the warrant article.
WSD FY17 Budget
Version 3.0 –Deliberative Session Version – 2/5/2015 Page 5
SCHOOL ADMINISTRATIVE UNIT #95
The Windham School District is the only school district that comprises School
Administrative Unit #95. The District is located in south-central New Hampshire in the Town of Windham. Located near the Massachusetts border and with easy access to Interstate #93 via exit 3, Windham is ideally situated
to provide access to Boston, the seacoast, and Concord in under an hour.
The Town of
Windham is a community of over 15,500 residents. The Town of Windham is a legally distinct entity governed by an elected Board of Selectmen.
For more information, please click here to visit the Town’s website.
The School District is composed of four schools serving approximately 2,900 students in grades Pre-School through 12.
The mission of the District is to be a
continuously improving learning community
providing quality services to enable all children to master the knowledge and
competencies necessary to function skillfully throughout life.
WSD FY17 Budget
Version 3.0 –Deliberative Session Version – 2/5/2015 Page 6
SCHOOLS
Golden Brook School
Grades: Preschool, Kindergarten, Grades 1 & 2 Enrollment: 571 students
Principal: Rory O’Connor
Assistant Principal: Deanna Poulin
Special Education Administrator: Karen Baldasaro Address: 112B Lowell Road
Phone: (603) 898-9586
Windham Center School
Grades: 3-5 Enrollment: 741 students Principal: Kathryn Bates Assistant Principal: Kimberly Freccero Special Education Administrator: Christina Kaskiewicz Address: 2 Lowell Road Phone: (603) 432-7732
Windham Middle School
Grades: 6-8
Enrollment: 734 students Principal: Patricia Wons
Assistant Principal: Brenda Morrow
Special Education Administrator: Kimberly Noyes Address: 112A Lowell Road
Phone: (603) 893-2636
Windham High School
Grades: 9-12 Enrollment: 851 students Principal: Robert Dawson Assistant Principal: Matt Malila Special Education Administrator: Jill Hanlon Address: 64 London Bridge Road Phone: (603) 537-2400
WSD FY17 Budget
Version 3.0 –Deliberative Session Version – 2/5/2015 Page 7
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 11
ELA/Literacy
New Hampshire Windham
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 11
Mathematics
New Hampshire Windham
ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT AND PROGRAMMING
The Windham School District is a high achieving District that routinely scores in the top 10% of the State in state-wide testing. In the first implementation of the Smarter Balanced
Achievement Test taken in the spring of 2015, Windham outpaced the State by an average of 15%
in English, language arts/literacy and 17% in mathematics.
WSD FY17 Budget
Version 3.0 –Deliberative Session Version – 2/5/2015 Page 8
Bachelors 22%
Masters 73%
CAGS/
Doctorate 5%
Highest Degree Earned by Teaching Staff
0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 100.0
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
AP Exam Passage Rate
Global New Hampshire WHS
ADVANCED PLACEMENT TEST SCORES
In addition, 98% of students who graduate Windham High School attend two or four year schools compared to the State average of 73.0%.1
The District also maintains a near-perfect dropout rate compared to the State average which is over 4%.2
The District’s AP scores outpace the State average by 9% and the global average by over 23%
with 152 students taking exams.
HIGHEST DEGREE EARNED BY TEACHING STAFF The District has highly qualified
teachers, over 78% of which have
achieved an advanced degree of at least a master’s degree.
The District, in agreement with the bargaining unit that represents the
teachers, supports tuition reimbursement and funding for teachers to attend
numerous workshops and conferences to extend their skills and teaching
techniques.
1 State data from FY13 retrieved from
http://education.nh.gov/data/documents/hs_cat13_14.pdfgov/data/documents/hs_cat12_13.pdf on 11/2/2015.
2 State data from FY14 retrieved from http://education.nh.gov/data/documents/dropout13- 14.pdfrt_report_12_13.pdf on 11/2/2015.
WSD FY17 Budget
Version 3.0 –Deliberative Session Version – 2/5/2015 Page 9
EXTENDED LEARNING OPPORTUNITIES (ELO)
Opportunities for learning beyond the traditional classroom environment, driven by students’ interests, talents and development, are expressly permitted by Windham School District
policy IHBC. ELO credits may be available for independent study, private instruction, team sports, performing groups, internships, community service not otherwise required by the school, and work study. Other learning experiences, not identified herein, will also be considered on an individual basis.
Students interested in such opportunities are to meet with the ELO Coordinator so as to become familiar with the exact procedure in order to gain pre-approval for any ELO experience.
Some of the community partners involved: Windham High School, Golden Brook, Center School, Windham Fire Department, Town of Windham Information Technology
Department, Infinite Fitness, Nottingham West Guidance Department, Balance Physical Therapy, and Canobie Lake Vet Center.
A student had an independent study EMT Course, internship at the Windham Fire
Department, and stated that the internship experience was the best thing he was involved with at the high school. He was the only student accepted at the fire science program, hands on live in program. He received his EMT certification before leaving high school.
A student was interested in physical therapy although not sure if she was going to pursue that field of study for her post-secondary education. The internship had such an effect on her that it solidified her decision and she decided to pursue physical therapy.
Another student’s confidence and self-esteem blossomed throughout his human
performance class of that he assisted for third grade students. He stated that his internship was a
"great experience because it gave me a better knowledge of what I wanted to do in the future." He realized that he wanted to be involved with sports and people in some capacity after high school.
He is currently attending the SNHU Advantage program.
Another student spent two years interning with a third grade classroom. After the first year she was unsure of her career path although wanted to intern for a second year. She enjoyed it so much that she changed her career direction from Health Science and is currently attending college at Plymouth to become an elementary teacher.
WSD FY17 Budget
Version 3.0 –Deliberative Session Version – 2/5/2015 Page 10
COLLEGE ACCEPTANCES CLASS OF 2015
College
The University of Alabama Alfred University American University Arizona State University The University of Arizona Assumption College Bates College Bay State College Becker College Bentley University Boston College Boston University Bowdoin College
Bowling Green State University Brandeis University
Brown University Bryant University
Bunker Hill Community College Butte College
University of California, Riverside University of California, San Diego Case Western Reserve University The Catholic University of America Central Connecticut State University University of Central Florida Champlain College College of Charleston Clarkson University Clemson University Coastal Carolina University Colby College
Colby-Sawyer College
University of Colorado at Denver Colorado State University University of Connecticut Cornell University
The Culinary Institute of America Curry College
University of Dallas Drexel University Duquesne University Eastern Nazarene College Emerson College Emmanuel College Emory University Endicott College Fairfield University Fitchburg State University Florida Gulf Coast University Florida State University Fordham University
Franciscan University of Steubenville Franklin Pierce University
Full Sail University Gannon University George Mason University
The George Washington University Georgia Institute of Technology Gordon College
University of Hartford
High Point University Hofstra University College of the Holy Cross Humboldt State University Husson University
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Indiana University at Bloomington Iowa State University
The University of Iowa Ithaca College Jacksonville University James Madison University
Johnson & Wales University (Providence) Kansas State University
University of Kansas Keene State College University of Kentucky
Lakes Region Community College (NHCTC) Landmark College
Lasell College Lehigh University Lesley University University of Louisville Loyola Marymount University University of Maine at Augusta Maine College of Art
University of Maine
Manchester Community College Marist College
Marquette University
MCPHS - Massachusetts College of Pharmacy & Health Sciences University of Massachusetts, Amherst University of Massachusetts, Boston University of Massachusetts, Lowell Merrimack College
University of Miami
Middlesex Community College - Lowell Campus
Montana State University, Bozeman The University of Montana, Missoula Montclair State University
Mount Holyoke College Mount Ida College
Nashua Community College (NHCTC) New England College
The New England Institute of Art University of New England University of New Hampshire University of New Haven New York University
NHTI - Concord's Community College Nichols College
University of North Carolina at Charlotte North Carolina State University University of North Dakota University of North Florida Northeastern University University of Northern Colorado Northern Essex Community College University of Ottawa
Pennsylvania College of Technology Pennsylvania State University - All Campuses University of Pennsylvania
Pepperdine University Plymouth State University Providence College Purdue University Quinnipiac University Regis College
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Rhode Island College
University of Rhode Island Rivier University Roanoke College
Rochester Institute of Technology University of Rochester
Roger Williams University Rutgers University-New Brunswick Sacred Heart University
Saint Anselm College Saint Joseph's College-ME Saint Michael's College Salve Regina University University of San Diego University of San Francisco Santa Clara University Seton Hall University Simmons College
University of South Carolina University of Southern California (Engineering)
University of Southern Maine Southern New Hampshire University Southern New Hampshire University - Salem Southern Vermont College
State University of New York at Albany Stetson University
Stonehill College Stony Brook University Suffolk University SUNY College at Geneseo Syracuse University The University of Tampa Texas Christian University The Ohio State University Trinity College
Truman State University Tufts University Union College
University at Buffalo The State University of New York
University of Vermont Villanova University University of Virginia University of Washington Wentworth Institute of Technology Western New England University Wheaton College MA
White Mountains Community College (NHCTC)
WINDHAM SCHOOL BOARD
The school board of the Windham School District is a five member group serving
overlapping terms. Board elections occur each March at the same time that voters decide on the District’s budget proposal. Board members are all at-large members who serve three year terms.
The Board generally meets the 1st and 3rd Tuesday of each month at 7:00 PM at the
Windham Community Development Office located at 3 North Lowell Road. More information can be found at the District’s website at www.windhamsd.org.
Mr. Dennis Senibaldi Board Member (978) 857-0970 [email protected]
Term Expires 2016 Mr. Rob Breton
Board Member (603) 965-4254 [email protected]
Term Expires 2017
Mr. Daniel Popovici-Muller Board Member
[email protected] Term Expires 2018
Mr. Ken Eyring Chairman (603) 434-4836 [email protected]
Term Expires 2017
Mr. Tom Murray Vice Chair (781) 389-6107 [email protected]
Term Expires 2018
WSD FY17 Budget
Version 3.0 –Deliberative Session Version – 2/5/2015 Page 12
Mr. Kevin Verratti Director of Technology
(603) 425-1976 [email protected]
Ms. Amina Fazlic Director of Human Resources
(603) 425-1976 [email protected]
Mr. John Pratte Director of Facilities
(603) 425-1976 [email protected]
WINDHAM DISTRICT LEVEL ADMINISTRATION
Dr. Tina H. McCoy
Interim Superintendent of Schools (603) 425-1976
Ms. Kori-Alice Becht Director of Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment
(603) 425-1976 [email protected]
Mr. Kenneth Duesing Director of Student Services
(603) 425-1976 [email protected]
Mr. Adam Steel Director of Business, Finance,
and Operations (603) 425-1976 [email protected]
WSD FY17 Budget
Version 3.0 –Deliberative Session Version – 2/5/2015 Page 13
BUDGET PREPARATION PROCESS
The budget for the school district is prepared for the ensuing school year over the course of several months with the voters of Windham having final authority for the passage of the proposed budget.
Budgets are prepared first at the building level, then reviewed and approved by the Superintendent. The School Board is then charged with reviewing and finalizing the budget that is to be reviewed by the voters.
First, the voters are invited to participate in a public hearing on the budget held by the School Board in early January. Then, the Board approves their proposed budget and posts it in late January for the voters to inspect. The official budget is what is recorded on the municipal services form published by the Department of Revenue Services and is referred to as the “MS-26.”
Next, the voters are invited to come to the deliberative session in early February to review, discuss, debate, and, if approved by a majority of the voters present at the deliberative session, amend the budget.
Finally, on the second Tuesday in March, the budget is presented to the voters on a ballot to either approve or to reject the proposed budget. If the voters reject the proposed budget, the number determined by the calculation of the default budget is what the school board has at its disposal to create a revised adopted budget. The default budget calculation is based on the previous years’ budget with certain adjustments and revisions as permitted by statute.
Action Date
Superintendent Presented Budget to Board 11/17/2015
Board reviewed Pre-School, GBS, and WCS Budgets 12/1/2015
Board reviewed WMS and WHS Budgets 12/8/2015
Board reviewed budget and begins discussion of warrant articles 12/15/2015
Post notice: budget hearing 1/7/2016
Post notice: bond hearing (if applicable) 1/7/2016
Submit petition warrant articles 1/12/2016
CBA Cost Items Finalized 1/12/2016
School Board Approved Budget and Default 1/13/2016
Budget Hearing 1/15/2016 at 7:00 PM
Bond Hearing- GBS & WMS Project 1/15/2016 at 7:00 PM Bond Hearing- Citizens Petition for WHS Track/Turf 1/19/2016 at 7:00 PM
SB: Warrant and default Finalized 1/19/2016
Post warrants, budget, and default 1/22/2016
Filing Period Opens 1/20/2016
Filing Period Closes 1/29/2016
Deliberative Session 2/5/2016 at 7:00 PM
Voting 3/8/2016
WSD FY17 Budget
Version 3.0 –Deliberative Session Version – 2/5/2015 Page 14
BUDGET PROCESS WITH REQUIRED FORMS
Building Level
• Department Heads and Directors
• Principal Submits to the SAU
• December, 2014 - October, 2015
SAU
• Reviews all budgets
• Superintendent produces budget to the Board for review
• October, 2015 - January, 2016
School Board
• Board reviews and finalizes budget for voters
• First budget hearing must take place by 1/19/2016
• Budget posted to voters by 1/25/2016
Deliberative Session
• Voters review and amend budget and warrant articles
• February 5, 2016 at 7:00 PM at WHS
Voting
• Voters approve final budget after deliberative session amendments
• March 8, 2016
Adopted Budget
• Board adopts a final operating budget
• April, 2016
Fiscal Year • July 1, 2016 - June 30, 2017
MS-26 Official Budget Default Budget Form
Warrant – All Items
MS-22 Appropriations Voted
MS-25 End of Year Report (September, 2017) MS-24 Revenue Estimate
(September, 2016) Tax Rate Set (October)
WSD FY17 Budget
Version 3.0 –Deliberative Session Version – 2/5/2015 Page 15
FISCAL YEAR 2017 WARRANT
INTRODUCTION
Eight warrant articles appear on the fiscal year 2017 warrant. The first deals with the election of officers. There are two warrant articles that represent bond appropriations, one of which was submitted via petition. The cost items associated with a tentative agreement with the teachers union is included as well as a trailer article that allows for a special meeting (voting process) if the article fails. Finally two articles that set aside money in capital reserve funds and an article dedicated to the operating budget are included.
The tax impact for each part of the budget and warrant articles is listed below:
Warrant Article Item Amount Offsetting Revenue Tax Rate Impact
2 GBS & WMS Project $40,050,000 $38,950,000 $0.48
3 Petition Track & Turf $4,104,000 $3,994,000 $0.05
5 Teacher Contract $476,729 $0 $0.21
7 CNA Contribution $685,125 $0 $0.30
8 Operating Budget $48,588,991 $13,705,960 $15.33
Total $93,904,845 $56,649,960 $16.37
8a Default Budget $47,460,815 $13,705,960 $14.83
4 CIP Future Facilities Projects $800,000 $0 $0.35
WSD FY17 Budget
Version 3.0 –Deliberative Session Version – 2/5/2015 Page 16
PRO FORMA TAX RATE CALCULATION
The local tax rate is determined by a formula that finds the difference between all appropriations approved by voters and all anticipated revenues expected by the District. That difference is called the school district tax assessment and is divided equally among all property owners in Windham based on the valuation of their property.
For FY16, 75% of the school district’s budget was paid as part of the school district tax assessment. The other 25% came from revenue sources including the State of New Hampshire, school building aid, federal and state grants, and food service revenue.
The largest revenue source besides the local tax payers is adequacy aid from the State.
Adequacy aid is based on a formula found in RSA 198:40-a. However, despite the formula
prescribed by statute, Windham receives almost $3,000,000 less than what it is entitled based on the formula, a shortage equal to over 826 students. For the past few years, the district has been receiving 108% more of the adequacy from the previous year to attempt to close this gap.
However, in FY17, the District is expected to receive over $2,000,000 in additional adequacy funding due to changes included in the State’s budget.
Examples of factors that have a positive impact on the tax rate are increasing valuation in Windham (thereby spreading the tax burden among more people), additional revenue from the State, and additional grant funds.
WSD FY17 Budget
Version 3.0 –Deliberative Session Version – 2/5/2015 Page 17
APPROPRIATIONS
Item FY16 FY17 Increase
General Fund $45,801,892 $46,870,235 $1,068,343
CNA $615,000 $685,125 $70,125
Other Warrant Articles $0 $1,686,729 $1,686,729 Federal Funds $561,098 $639,216 $78,118
Donations $0 $0 $0
WHS $0 $0 $0
Food Service $915,786 $971,104 $55,318
Summer Camp $70,100 $70,100 $0
Laptop Repair Program $17,400 $17,400 $0
Kindergarten $0 $0 $0
Kindergarten Construction $0 $0 $0
WHS Band Lessons $11,842 $11,842 $0
GBS Summer Program $8,017 $8,017 $0
Adult Education Program $1,077 $1,077 $0 Sub-Total $48,002,212 $50,960,845 $2,958,633
REVENUES
Item FY16 FY17 Increase
Tuition $105,536 $91,036 -$14,500
Food Service Sales $812,786 $856,104 $43,318 Student Activities $17,400 $17,400 $0 Other Local Sources $161,961 $144,608 -$17,353 School Building Aid $1,000,824 $940,000 -$60,824 Catastrophic Aid $252,122 $252,122 $0 Child Nutrition $8,000 $10,000 $2,000 Federal Grants $561,098 $639,216 $78,118 Child Nutrition $95,000 $105,000 $10,000 Medicaid Distribution $200,000 $200,000 $0
UFB $2,816,910 $300,000 -$2,516,910
SWEPT $5,128,390 $5,326,111 $197,721 Grant $3,015,227 $4,824,363 $1,809,136 Sub-Total $14,175,254 $13,705,960 -$469,294
WSD FY17 Budget
Version 3.0 –Deliberative Session Version – 2/5/2015 Page 18
TAX RATE CALCULATION
Item FY16 FY17 Increase
Net Assessment $33,826,958 $37,254,885 $3,427,927
Valuation $2,252,833,574 $2,275,361,910 $22,528,336
Tax Rate $15.02 $16.37 $1.35
WSD FY17 Budget
Version 3.0 –Deliberative Session Version – 2/5/2015 Page 19
ARTICLE 1: ELECTION OF OFFICERS Article 1. Election of Officers (voting by official ballot March 8, 2016) To the following school district offices:
To choose one School Board member for the ensuing three years.
a. Dennis Senibaldi (incumbent) b. Eileen Mashimo
c. Matt Rounds
WSD FY17 Budget
Version 3.0 –Deliberative Session Version – 2/5/2015 Page 20
ARTICLE 2: GBS & WMS CONSTRUCTION PROJECT
Article 2. “Shall the Windham School District raise and appropriate the sum of thirty eight million, nine hundred and fifty thousand Dollars ($38,950,000) for the purpose of constructing and equipping a renovation and addition at Golden Brook School to be a pre-school, kindergarten and first through fourth grade school, construction and equipping of a renovation and/or an addition at Windham Middle School to include renovations to science labs, family and consumer science and technical education classrooms, and for the acquisition of approximately four (4) acres of land known as 114 Lowell Road, Windham, Rockingham County, New Hampshire as described in the Town of Windham Tax Maps as Lot 24-F-2500 and in Deed recorded Rockingham County Registry of Deeds, Book 3989 Page 2741; and to authorize the issuance of not more than thirty eight million, nine hundred and fifty thousand Dollars ($38,950,000) of bonds or notes under and in compliance with the Municipal Finance Act, RSA 33:1 et seq., as amended; and to authorize the School Board to apply for, obtain and accept federal, state or other aid, if any, which may be available for said project and to comply with all laws applicable to said project; and to authorize the School Board to issue, negotiate, sell and deliver said bonds and notes and to determine the rate of interest thereon and the maturity and other terms thereof; and to authorize the School Board to take any other action to carry out this vote; and to further raise and appropriate the sum one million, one hundred thousand dollars ($1,100,000) for the first year’s payment on the bonds or notes? Note: eight hundred thousand Dollars of the first year’s payment on the bonds or notes has been included in the capital improvement plan as approved by the CIP committee.”
Recommended by the School Board (4-0) (3/5 majority vote required.)
DISCUSSION
This warrant article will authorize the District to acquire the Massahos property which is adjacent to GBS on the south side and to perform a major, multi-phase renovation and addition project to Golden Brook School. Once completed, GBS will house pre-school, kindergarten, and grades 1 through 4. WCS will house grades 5 & 6. WMS will house grades 7 & 8 and will be renovated to allow the building to be approved as a middle school including proper science labs, family & consumer science, and technical education spaces.
The Building & Grounds Committee, the administration, and the school board have been working on this project for a year in preparation for this election cycle. If passed, work would begin within six months and would take 2-3 years in total.
The tax impact for the project would cost the average homeowner $165 the first year. The second year would be the highest impact of the project with a cost of about $450 for the average home owner. The cost would decline over the next 24 years until 2042 with a cost of about $239.
WSD FY17 Budget
Version 3.0 –Deliberative Session Version – 2/5/2015 Page 21
PROJECT DESIGN
The School Board has worked with a site engineer, an architect, and three independent cost estimating firms to design and to evaluate the estimated cost of the project. Tighe & Bond has provided site design and engineering for the project. Banwell Architects has been the lead architect for the project.
PRELIMINARY SITE DESIGN
WSD FY17 Budget
Version 3.0 –Deliberative Session Version – 2/5/2015 Page 22
PRELIMINARY GBS BUILDING DESIGN
WSD FY17 Budget
Version 3.0 –Deliberative Session Version – 2/5/2015 Page 23
PRELIMINARY WMS BUILDING DESIGN
WSD FY17 Budget
Version 3.0 –Deliberative Session Version – 2/5/2015 Page 24
COST ESTIMATES
Eckman Construction, Steve Horton Construction Estimating, and MacMillan Construction have all provided cost estimates for the project. The District has compiled project cost estimates in four major categories:
1. Site-work: All of the construction cost associated with work outside of the new building including septic, the new access road, paving, etc.;
2. Building Construction Cost: Direct cost associated with construction of the building itself;
3. Construction Management Expenses: Expenses and allowances associated with the company who is responsible for managing the construction of the project;
and,
4. Soft Costs: Direct owner paid expenses including architectural and engineering fees, furniture and equipment, temporary portables to house students during construction (if necessary), legal, traffic studies, etc.
All three of the construction estimates have been within a few percentage points of one another. The most recent estimate, which was provided by MacMillan Construction, assigns the following estimated costs for the project:
Item Amount
Site-work $3,788.097
GBS Building Construction Cost $20,852,124 WMS Building Construction Cost $2,162,385 Construction Management Expenses $5,215,525 Soft Costs (District Provided) $8,002,919 Land Acquisition (Massahos Property) $590,000
Grand Total $40,611,050
WSD FY17 Budget
Version 3.0 –Deliberative Session Version – 2/5/2015 Page 25
TAX IMPACT
The project will have a significant tax impact starting in FY17 with an interest only payment estimated at $1,060,000. The second year of the project will have the highest tax impact and then will slowly decrease. However, while the estimates provided below are a fairly standard repayment schedule, the School Board has the authority to investigate other amortization schedules to
minimize tax impact and to coordinate the repayment schedule to align with the WHS bond repayment schedule.
FY Payment Tax Rate $350k Home
FY17 $1,060,306 $0.47 $165
FY18 $2,895,950 $1.29 $450
…
FY42 $1,536,425 $0.68 $239
Total $57,029,931 $8,860
$0
$1
$1
$2
$2
$3
$3
FY17 FY19 FY21 FY23 FY25 FY27 FY29 FY31 FY33 FY35 FY37 FY39 FY41
Millions
Article #2 Only
$0
$1
$2
$3
$4
$5
$6
FY17 FY19 FY21 FY23 FY25 FY27 FY29 FY31 FY33 FY35 FY37 FY39 FY41
Millions
Total Indebtedness
WHS New Project
WSD FY17 Budget
Version 3.0 –Deliberative Session Version – 2/5/2015 Page 26
ARTICLE 3: PETITION ARTICLE FOR TRACK & TURF AT WHS Article 3. Submitted by citizens’ petition. “Shall the Windham School District raise and appropriate the sum of three million, nine hundred and ninety four thousand dollars ($3,994,000) for the purpose of renovating, constructing and equipping a running track and field with throwing and jumping facilities, with a multipurpose athletic organic synthetic turf, lighting and seating at the Windham High School; and to authorize the issuance of not more than three million, nine hundred and ninety four thousand dollars ($3,994,000) of bonds or notes under and in compliance with the Municipal Finance Act, RSA 33:1 et. Seq., as amended; and to authorize the School Board to apply for, obtain and accept federal, state, or other aid, if any, which may be available for said project and to comply with all laws applicable to said project; and to authorize the School Board to issue, negotiate, sell and deliver said bonds and notes and to determine the rate of interest thereon and the maturity and other items thereof; and to authorize the School Board to take any other action to carry out this vote; and to further raise and appropriate the sum of one hundred and ten thousand dollars ($110,000) for the first year’s payment on the bonds or notes?”
Recommended by the School Board (3-1) (3/5 majority vote required.)
WSD FY17 Budget
Version 3.0 –Deliberative Session Version – 2/5/2015 Page 27
ARTICLE 4: CIP ARTICLE FOR FUTURE BUILDING PROJECTS
Article 4. “If and only if Article 2 fails, shall the Windham School District establish a Capital Reserve Fund under the provisions of RSA 35:1 for the purpose of a School Building Construction, Renovation, and Land Acquisition fund and to raise and appropriate the sum of eight hundred thousand Dollars ($800,000) to be placed in this fund. Funds cannot be withdrawn from this fund without a future authorization by voters? Note: This appropriation is included in the Capital
Improvement Plan and is recommended by the CIP Committee.” If Article 2 passes, this Article shall be null and void. (Majority Vote Required)
Recommended by the School Board (5-0)
DISCUSSION
This article will only be valid if article 2 fails. If article 2 fails, but article 4 passes, then
$800,000 will be placed into a new capital reserve fund. This fund, held in the custody of the
trustees of the trust fund, will be for future use by the school district to build or renovate schools, or to acquire land. However, funds placed into the CRF fund will only be used if the voters specifically approve the use of those funds at a future election. The School Board, nor any other agent, will have any authority to spend those funds without a future approval by voters.
WSD FY17 Budget
Version 3.0 –Deliberative Session Version – 2/5/2015 Page 28
ARTICLE 5: CBA WITH TEACHERS UNION
Article 5. “Shall the Windham School District approve the cost items included in the collective bargaining agreement reached between the School Board and WEA (Windham Education
Association) which calls for the following increases in salaries and benefits at the current staffing level over the amount paid in the prior fiscal year:
Fiscal Year Estimated Increase
2016-2017 $476,729
2017-2018 $419,240
and further to raise and appropriate the sum of four hundred and seventy-six thousand, seven hundred and twenty-nine Dollars ($476,729) for the 2016-2017 year, such sum representing the additional costs attributable to the increase in salaries and benefits required by the new agreement over those that would be paid at the current staffing levels?”
Recommended by the School Board (5-0)
ARTICLE 6: SPECIAL MEETING AUTHORIZATION
Article 6. “Shall the Windham School District if Article 5 is defeated, authorize the governing body to call one special meeting, at its option, to address Article 5 cost items only?”
Recommended by the School Board (5-0)
DISCUSSION
The teacher contract is a two year contract between the school board and the teachers’
union. It represents a 1% raise each year, an expansion of steps 14 and 15 to be full steps instead of being half steps, and significant changes to health insurance. The main health insurance plan offered to teachers has been changed from a point of service plan to an HMO plan. Also, a limitation to the number of teachers eligible for the retirement severance package has been added starting in FY18.
WSD FY17 Budget
Version 3.0 –Deliberative Session Version – 2/5/2015 Page 29
ARTICLE 7: CAPITAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT CONTRIBUTION
Article 7. “Shall the Windham School District raise and appropriate the sum of six hundred and eighty-five thousand, one hundred and twenty-five Dollars ($685,125) to be added to the Capital Needs and Building & Grounds Maintenance Capital Reserve Fund established in March 2015?” (Majority Vote Required)
Recommended by the School Board (5-0)
In addition to the operating budget warrant article, the District has received support from the Town of Windham’s Capital Improvement Plan Committee to fund capital projects that are identified in the District’s Capital Needs Assessment Plan.
The District’s CNA plan is a 20 year plan that identifies major facilities and grounds maintenance, repair, and replacement projects throughout the District. It calls for approximately
$685,125 each year (with a growth factor) to be funded by the District to stay on target.
The District’s strategy for these projects is to use a capital reserve fund established by the voters in March, 2015 to be used as a holding account for these funds. By using a capital reserve fund (as defined and governed by RSA 35), the following advantages are realized:
1. Any savings from projects completed cannot be used for other purposes and can be left in place for future projects, thereby reducing future amounts needed to be raised each year by voters to fund the plan;
2. A high level of transparency with the application of the funds. Budget numbers can be used to forecast the cost of projects while only the exact amount actually spent on the projects will be withdrawn from the fund each year; and,
3. By saving for future projects through the CRF, the impact to the tax payers is consistent and will not see a high level of volatility each year as the cost of projects fluctuates. For example, in some years, almost $1.2 million worth of projects are scheduled to be completed. If there was no CRF, the tax rate would experience a spike that year following by an adjustment the following year. A CRF provides a consistent tax impact.
More information about the capital needs assessment can be found on the District’s website here: http://sites.windhamsd.org/business/home-1/cna
The table below lists all of the projects for next summer along with their budgeted values.
WSD FY17 Budget
Version 3.0 –Deliberative Session Version – 2/5/2015 Page 30
Project Amount
WCS Classroom Finishes $147,785 SAU Boiler Replacement $16,683 WHS Classroom Finishes $26,049 WCS Office Finishes $12,090 GBS Classroom Finishes $100,575 WHS Caulk/Flash Repair $42,634
The balance of what is proposed for specific projects and what will be raised will be used for future projects to ensure a stable tax impact.
The current balance of the capital reserve fund for the capital needs assessment program was $0.00 as of 7/1/2015 and the appropriation approved by voters in the amount of $615,000 was transferred to the newly established account in July, 2015.
WSD FY17 Budget
Version 3.0 –Deliberative Session Version – 2/5/2015 Page 31
ARTICLE 8: OPERATING BUDGET
Article 8. “Shall the Windham School District raise and appropriate as an operating budget, not including appropriations by special warrant articles and other appropriations voted separately, the amounts set forth on the budget posted with the warrant or as amended by vote of the first session, for the purposes set forth therein, totaling forty-eight million, five hundred and eighty- eight thousand, nine hundred and ninety-one dollars ($48,588,991)? Should this article be defeated, the default budget shall be forty-seven million, four hundred and sixty thousand, eight hundred and fifteen dollars ($47,460,815), which is the same as last year, with certain adjustments required by previous action of the Windham School District or by law; or the governing body may hold one special meeting, in accordance with RSA 40:13, X and XVI, to take up the issue of a revised operating budget only?
Recommended by the School Board (3-2)
*NOTE: Warrant Article 8 (operating budget) does not include appropriations proposed in any other warrant articles.
DISCUSSION
The pages that follow describe in detail the operating budget. If the operating budget warrant article is not approved by voters, the default budget calculation will be used by the School Board to adopt an operating budget.
WSD FY17 Budget
Version 3.0 –Deliberative Session Version – 2/5/2015 Page 32
BUDGET EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The FY17 general fund budget represents an increase of 0.98% over the FY16 budget (or 2.33% when controlling for the CNA warrant article) driven largely by positional changes driven by enrollment shifts throughout the District and increased maintenance and repair funding.
Enrollment is growing steadily at the secondary level while trending downward at the elementary level. It is unclear if a downward enrollment experience at GBS in kindergarten and first grade is a result of the recession from 2008-2010 or the beginning of a trend. However, with
students currently enrolled in our schools, WHS will grow to over 1,000 students in less than five years.
Due to the expansive student population growth in the District in recent years, the District has the need to expand staffing in several areas. New position requests represent an increase of
$546,987 to the budget.
WSD FY17 Budget
Version 3.0 –Deliberative Session Version – 2/5/2015 Page 33
ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS
HISTORICAL ENROLLMENT
The District has experienced significant growth in student population since 2005 when the Windham High School project was approved by voters. Since the 2004-2005 school year, student population in grades one through eight has increased 22%.
In addition, the District added half-day Kindergarten to the District the same year the new high school opened in 2008. With the addition of both kindergarten and high school students, the District has increased the number of student educated in Windham schools from 1,585 in 2005 to 2,897 this year, an increase of 86%.
The K-8 population is expected to see a modest decline of 9.8% between now and 2021 if enrollment projections prove to be accurate.
The high school has experienced population growth since it became a 9-12 school for the first time in 2011. Since then, the 9-12 high school population has increased 22.5% and is expected to increase another 18% between now and 2021.
FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 Pre-School 15 23 14 19 16 20 21 10 16 7.00 11 8 10 19 40
Kindergarten N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 141 160 169 173 169 145 131 Readiness 48 45 50 40 48 42 55 35 28 20 16 14 N/A N/A N/A 1 170 179 196 183 182 200 194 246 205 220 232 226 242 201 185 2 143 178 170 201 187 187 202 198 260 208 226 242 230 247 215
3 GBS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 66 95 83 0 0
3 WCS 221 142 180 168 208 188 199 211 207 253 146 139 163 234 251 4 198 226 145 188 179 211 196 204 207 209 253 223 238 252 237 5 197 214 225 152 187 187 215 198 205 208 216 257 231 244 253 6 182 195 209 210 153 182 194 209 202 209 212 220 243 237 247 7 193 176 189 205 211 159 180 199 214 202 206 214 222 245 238 8 194 190 175 192 209 209 159 186 197 214 198 210 219 219 249 9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 192 185 210 214 212 220 227 10 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 131 188 178 196 195 205 227 11 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 127 181 168 199 194 197 12 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 126 167 170 194 200
Total P-12 1,561 1,568 1,553 1,558 1,580 1,585 1,615 1,696 2,205 2,410 2,646 2,766 2,826 2,856 2,897