• No results found

Basic Concept folding of thin structures

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Basic Concept folding of thin structures"

Copied!
22
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

theoretical details

(2)

Basic Concept – folding of “thin structures”

(3)

Folding mechanisms- Basic concept:

quasi-isometric transformations

(4)

Folding Modes – experimental program

(5)

Superfolding Element: Basic Folding Modes

Asymmetric folding mode Symmetric folding mode “Inverted” folding mode

(6)

SuperFolding Element: Energy dissipation mechanisms

Basic folding mechanisms in a deformed SuperFolding Element (SE):

1 Deformation of a floating toroidal surface.

2 Bending along stationary hinge lines.

3 Rolling deformations.

4 Opening of a conical surfaces.

5..Bending deformations along inclined, stationary, hinge lines following locking of the traveling hinge line 3.

(7)

SFE: Example of Elementary Calculations 1

(internal energy dissipation)

u N E

and M

Ebo    mo

4

2

/ t M

o

 

o

t

N

o

 

o

1. Rates of energy dissipation in bending and compression/tension

o

b

C M

E  8 

2. Total energy dissipation

t M H H

N

dy yN E

o o

H

o m

2 2

0

4 4 2

 

(8)

SFE: Example of Elementary Calculations 2 (energy balance equation)

eff ext m

eff m m

ext

P E P

d P d

P E

eff eff

 

  

0 0

) (

Energy supplied to the system

 

 

 

H t

M c t

M H H H

P

o o

eff m

 

2 4 ) 2

(

Mean crushing force - a function of the plastic folding wave 2H

t C t

H

t C M

P

o m

2 73 . 0

2 4

Result of minimization procedure

73 . 0 2

/ H

eff

(9)

SFE – mechanisms of internal energy dissipation

Rolling deformation and flow over the toroidal surface (inextensible in rolling/flow direction)

(10)

SFE – Elementary Solutions

Right angle (F = 90 deg) Elements

Symmetric (extensional) Asymmetric (quasi-inextensional)

(11)

SFE – Effective crushing distance (square column case)

b

a

C  

(12)

5 ...

2 , 1 ),

, (

} 2 ) ( )

(

) ( )

) ( { (

4

*

5 5 4 4

3 3 2 2

1 1

2

 F

i A

A where

A H t

A H

r A H H

A C t

A r P t

i i

eff N

o M

o

M o M

o N

m o

 

 

Standing alone SFE

uniform thickness

 

 

eff N

o M

o M

o

M b o M a

o N

m o

A H t t

A H r t

A H t

H t b H

t A a

t A r P t

) 2 ( )

( )

(

) ( )

) ( 4 (

1

} ) (

{

5 5 2

5 4 4 4

2 3 4

3 2

3

2 2 2

2 2 1 1 2

1 1

Standing alone SFE

different thicknesses of flanges

m i

J

i N i

i o

M i i

o

M i

o

M i

i o

N i

eff

P t

A r

t A C

H A H

r A H

t A H

   

 

1

2

0 1 1 2 2 3 3

4 4 5 5

4

2

{ ( ) ( ) ( )

( ) ( ) }

     

   

Assembly of SFE’s



P H

P r

P

m m m

0 ;

0 ;

0

*

SFE – Governing Functional for Arbitrary Cross Section

(13)

Prediction of leading folding mode based on the level of mean crushing force

The “energy barrier” concept accounts for initial imperfection and spontaneous change of folding

mode

a m

a m s

m

P P qP

qq cr

Crushing response of an isolated SFE

) 120 90

(

0

0

F F  ( 90

0

 120

0

)

(14)

Natural folding modes of a cross-section and Leading Corner concept

 

 

(15)

Leading Corner Concept – deformation transfer and generation of a natural folding mode

(16)

Axial Crushing Response of Cross Section

(synergy of analytical, semi-analytical solutions and experimental data)

Super Folding Element

•Folding modes

•Mean crushing force

•Deep collapse response

Amplitude of progressive buckling – experimental formula

Von Karman/Stowell - Iliushyn effective width formula

(unified approach)

(17)

Effective Width Formula – Unified Approach

ELASTICITY (Euler, Timoshenko etc)

PLASTICITY (bilinear material representation ES, ET) (Stowell - Iliushyn) General equilibrium equation

D w N w N w N w p

w w w w

x xx xy xy y yy

xxxx xxyy yyyy

4

4

2 2

( , , , )

, , ,

Example – in-plane loading of the plate Governing equilibrium equations

D4wN wx ,xx0 (1 )

4 3

4 2 0

4 4

4

2 2

4 4

2

E 2

E w x

w x y

w y

N D

w x

T S

x

Critical stress for simply supported loaded ends

2 2 2

) 1 (

412

b t E

cr





S T p S

cr E

E b

t

E 2 1 3

9

2 2

Abramowicz’s critical strain approach

2 2 2

) 1 (

3

b

t E

cr

cr





S T s

p cr p

cr E

E b

t

E 2 1 3

9

2 2

Consider power type material representation:

n

y

y

( )

then:

1

1

n E

n n E

y y y S y

y y

T

2 2 2

) 1 (

3

b

t E

cr

cr

does not depend on ‘n’

n

b t

p

cr 2 1 3

9

2 2

The graph on the left hand side shows that the critical elastic and plastic strains differ slightly in a wide range of hardening exponent ‘n’. It follows that the simple expression for elastic strain can be used to estimate critical strains in both elastic as well as plastic plates. This approach is used throughout all the calculation modules of VCS. E.q. in torsion

2 2 2

) 1 (

12

b ks t

cr

for elastic material. This expression is also used to estimate crpl. It is very useful procedure since closed-form solution does not exist for plastic torsion buckling.

(18)

Leading Corner Concept – diversity of folding modes

Different folding modes initialize in

leading SFE

(19)

Deformation Transfer - Connection Concept

Unconnected SFE fold freely and do not create compatible folding

Connections force connected element to fold in

compatible manner regardless of the type of physical connection

(20)

Diversity of folding modes and resulting sensitivity to

initial imperfections (square tubes)

(21)

Diversity of folding modes and resulting sensitivity to

initial imperfections (circular tubes)

(22)

Design for Axial Crush – the importance of triggering mechanism

(A. Bockel Master Thesis – 1993)

References

Related documents