Keep an eye on costs
Keep
an
Eye
on
Costs
(Erasmus
Room)
Tuesday 24 March 2009
Manu Malbrain
Intensive
Care
Unit
ZiekenhuisNetwerk Antwerpen
Campus
Stuivenberg
Antwerpen,
Belgium
Pulsion Session
2
Manu Malbrain
• ICU Director and manager ZNA STER
• Founding President WSACS (www.wsacs.org)
• Chairman WCACS 2007 (www.wcacs.org)
• Educational Grant: 2003 ESICM Chris Stoutenbeek Award
• Member Medical Advisory Board
– Pulsion Medical
Systems
– KCI
Benelux
– Spiegelberg
– Holtech
Medical
– Neutec
• European Patent Holder CiMON (PMS)
• Research Project: Draeger, Edwards, Bard, Wolfe Tory
• Fees
‐
Honoraria: GSK, MSD
Biggest Bias = WSACS
Biggest Bias = WSACS
Thanks to F. Michard
Keep an eye on costs
WSACS
Jan De Waele, B CTWG
Zsolt Baogh, AUS Secretary WCACS
Michael Sugrue, AUS President
Manu Malbrain, B Founding President
Treasurer
Rao Ivatury, USA Vice-President
Mike Cheatham, USA President-Elect
WSACS Executive Committee 2007-2009: Your Servants…
4
€3500
Costs a lot
No teaching
Self development
Costs Nothing
A lot of teaching
Self development
MANAGEMENT SCHOOL
Keep an eye on costs
Who actually uses
less invasive HD
What type
of
LIHD?
‐
NiCO
2
‐
LiDCO
‐
PiCCO
‐
Doppler
‐
Vigileo
7
Keep an eye on costs
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
%
Intermittent
PAC
Continuous
PAC
Doppler
Pulse Contour
Other
Neil 2003
Neil 2003
Availability of Cardiac Output
Equipment in UK ICU’s
Availability of Cardiac Output
Equipment in UK ICU’s
8
Ideal
System
Ideal
System
Real Time beat to beat CO
Real Time Preload + Afterload
Adequacy data
Real
Time
beat
to
beat
CO
Real
Time
Preload
+
Afterload
Adequacy
data
Minimally invasive
Widely applicable
Minimally
invasive
Widely
applicable
Simple to Operate and Understand
Measured variables
Simple
to
Operate
and
Understand
Measured
variables
Clear Data Display + Interpretation
Clear
Data
Display
+
Interpretation
Nurse driven at the bedside
Nurse
driven
at
the
bedside
Neonates to adults
Neonates
to
adults
Ideal Cardiac Output Monitor
9
Keep an eye on costs
LiDCO
LiDCO
NiCO
2
NiCO
2
CEDVi
CEDVi
Monitor
Monitor
PiCCO
PiCCO
Tonometer
Tonometer
Evita 4
Evita 4
HemoSonic
HemoSonic
Ideal Situation ?
Ideal Situation ?
Why $AV€ costs?
10
• Risen
by
329%/
20
years
• 30%
of
ICU
patients
• Carries
a
high
mortality
• Most
common
cause
of
death
in
ICU
• Worldwide
1400
deaths/day
• In
the
TOP
‐
league
of
death
causes
SEPSIS cost implications
SEPSIS cost implications
11
Keep an eye on costs
HOS mortality n(%)
ICU mortality n(%)
Admissions
Severe
sepsis
or
septic
shock
Total 21,025
Total 6,534 (31.1%)
Total 8,372 (39.8%)
ICNARC 6 month Raw data, prior to adjustment
for 65% submission, 70% admission
a UK perspective
12
Lung
1
Colon
2
Breast
3
Sepsis
4
cancers
1,2,3www.statistics.gov.uk,, 4Intensive Care National Audit Research Centre (2005)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Lung
Colon
Breast
Sepsis
a UK perspective
a UK perspective
13
15
Keep an eye on costs
LiDCO
LiDCO
NiCO
2
NiCO
2
CEDVi
CEDVi
Monitor
Monitor
PiCCO
PiCCO
Tonometer
Tonometer
Evita 4
Evita 4
HemoSonic
HemoSonic
Ideal Situation ?
Ideal Situation ?
How to $AV€ costs?
16
CO$T$ FOR KNOWL€DG€
0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 device PiCCO LiDCO NiCO2 HemoSonic CEDVI 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 device PiCCO Lidco NiCO Hemosonic CEDVI 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 device PiCCO Lidco NiCO Hemosonic CEDVI 0 5 10 15 20 25 device PiCCO Lidco NiCO Hemosonic CEDVIDEVICE
SET-UP
MEASURE
DAY
17
Keep an eye on costs
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
-1
1
3
5
7
9
11
13
15
Time (days)
C
o
s
t (
€
) .
PiCCO
LiDCO
NiCO2
HemoSonic
CEDVI
18
Cumulative Cost (€)
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10 11 12 13 14 15
Time (days)
CEDVI
LiDCO
PiCCO
NiCO2
HemoSonic
PAC
PAC
PiCCO
PiCCO
LiDCO
LiDCO
Malbrain M. Yearbook ISICEM 2005: 603-31
19
Keep an eye on costs
SCORES
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% Cost PiCCO Lidco NiCO Hemosonic CEDVI EffectivenessCO$T
CO$T
€FF€CT
€FF€CT
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% Cost-Effectiveness PiCCO LiDCO NiCO HemoSonic CEDVI20
LiDCO
PiCCO
NiCO
HEMOSONiC
CO$T
€FF€CT
RATiO
Malbrain M. Yearbook ISICEM 2005: 603-31
21
Keep an eye on costs
How
to
be
More
Cost
Effective?
n
$P€ND MOR€
MORE
COSTS
=
MORE
EFFECTIVE
?
o
$AV€ MOR€
LESS
COSTS
=
MORE
EFFECTIVE
?
p
$€€ MOR€
How
to
be
more
cost
effective
$€€
MOR€
THAN
OTH€RS
$€€ MOR€
23
Keep an eye on costs
$€€
MOR€
THAN
OTH€RS
n
n
o
o
p
p
q
q
r
r
24
THE MORE YOU LOOK
THE MORE YOU SEE
THE MORE YOU LEARN
THE MORE YOU KNOW
$€€
MOR€
THAN
OTH€RS
TO SEE MORE
WHAT YOU KNOW
n
n
o
o
p
p
q
q
r
r
YOU WILL LEARN
TODAY
25
Keep an eye on costs
MAP=51
CI=2.1
LACTATE=6
CVP=5
PAOP=7
GEDVi=580
P/F=179
EVLWi=21
$€€
MOR€
THAN
OTH€RS
26
MAP=51
CI=2.1
LACTATE=6
27
Keep an eye on costs
PAOP=25
GEDVi=575
P/F=124
After Thoracocenthesis 1050mL
EVLWi=8
Pleural effusions
Atelectasis
Hemorrhage
Herniation
Diaphragm
Pleural pressure ?
PEEP ? - IAP ?
Cardiac compliance?
Lung compliance?
$€€
MOR€
THAN
OTH€R$
28
• Fick
– Difficult, large room for
error, “Gold” standard
– NiCO
2
• Bioimpedance
– Variable ICU accuracy
– Cardiodynamics
• Doppler
– Accurate, but user
dependent
– HemoSonic, Deltex, WAKI
• Pulse
Contour
Analysis
– PiCCO
– PulseCO
– Vigileo
• Thermodilution
– Vigilance PAC, CEDVi
– (PiCCO)
• Indicator
Dilution
– Invasive
– (LiDCO)
Available technologies for
continuous Cardiac Output
Available technologies for
continuous Cardiac Output
29
Keep an eye on costs
Evidence Based Medicine
n
Does
my new monitoring
device does
as
well as
the
gold
standard?
o
Does
my new monitoring
device give
new or additional information?
p
Does
the
interpretation of
the
data
change my treatment?
q
Does
the
new
‐
variable
‐
driven treatment
change patient outcome?
SV
GEDVi
EVLWi
DO
2
$€€
MOR€
THAN
OTH€RS
30
The
Parachute
Study
Gordon C S Smith, Jill P Pell BMJ 2003; 327:1459-60
• Widely used
• Gravitational challenge
9
Prevent death
9
Prevent injury
• Adverse effects
9
Failure
9
Iatrogenic
• Studies free fall
9
no 100% mortality
• Widely used
• Gravitational challenge
9
Prevent death
9
Prevent injury
• Adverse effects
9
Failure
9
Iatrogenic
• Studies free fall
9
no 100% mortality
WHAT DO WE KNOW
WHAT DO WE KNOW
WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS
WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS
• No RCCT on parachute
• Basis for parachute use
9
Purely observational
• Efficacy explained by
9
Healthy cohort
• He who believes in EBM
9
Comes down
9
to earth
9
with a bump…
• No RCCT on parachute
• Basis for parachute use
9
Purely observational
• Efficacy explained by
9
Healthy cohort
• He who believes in EBM
9
Comes down
9
to earth
31
Keep an eye on costs
$€€ MOR€ THAN OTH€R$
SV
GEDVi
EVLWi
32
Improve Outcome
Use the right parameters
FLOW
PRELOAD
ORGAN
O
2
XYGEN
33
Keep an eye on costs
Improve Outcome
Use the right parameters
FLOW
PRELOAD
ORGAN
O
2
XYGEN
SV/CO
GEDVi/SVV
PPV/SVRi
dPmax
GEF/EVLWi
S
cv
VO
2
VO
2
/DO
2
34
ARE
YOU
GETTING
ENOUGH
FOR
35
Keep an eye on costs
WiTH
LeSS
WiTH
LeSS
Do
MoRE
Do
36
$€€ MOR€ THAN OTH€R$
SV/CO
SV/CO
38
Landmark PAPER
Landmark PAPER
Optimisation PROTOCOL
Optimisation PROTOCOL
• Using
a
PAC
does
not
alter
outcome
• Protocolised care
affects
outcome
– Postop complications
↓
– ICU
and
HOS
stay
↓
– Total
cost
↓
40
SV/CO
SV/CO
Control
group
Protocol
group
Control
group
Protocol
group
Control
group
Protocol
group
Control
group
Protocol
group
Sinclair
Sinclair
Wakeling
Wakeling
McKendry
McKendry
McKendry M, McGloin H, Saberi D, Caudwell L, Brady AR, Singer M.
Randomised controlled trial assessing the impact of a nurse delivered, flow monitored protocol for optimisation of circulatory status after cardiac surgery.
British Medical Journal 2004; 329(7460): 258.
McKendry M, McGloin H, Saberi D, Caudwell L, Brady AR, Singer M.
McKendry M, McGloin H, Saberi D, Caudwell L, Brady AR, Singer M.
Randomised controlled trial assessing the impact of a nurse deli
Randomised controlled trial assessing the impact of a nurse delivered, flow monitored protocol for optimisation of circulatory svered, flow monitored protocol for optimisation of circulatory status after cardiac surgery.tatus after cardiac surgery.
British Medical Journal 2004; 329(7460): 258.
41
Keep an eye on costs
SV/CO
SV/CO
McKendry BMJ 2004; 329: 258
McKendry
42
SV/CO
SV/CO
• 174 CABG pts analysed
• Protocol: SVI > 35 ml/m
2
• Postop complications:
26 (2 deaths) vs.
17 (4 deaths)
• HOS stay reduced
from 13.9 to 11.4 days
• HOS bed days reduced: 18%
• ICU bed usage reduced: 23%
McKendry BMJ 2004; 329: 258
McKendry
McKendry
BMJ 2004; 329: 258
BMJ 2004; 329: 258
43
Keep an eye on costs
Sinclair S et al. British Medical Journal 1997; 315(7113): 909-12
Intraoperative intravascular volume optimisation and length of hospital stay after repair of proximal femoral fracture
Sinclair S et al.
Sinclair S et al.
British Medical Journal 1997; 315(7113): 909
British Medical Journal 1997; 315(7113): 909
-
-
12
12
Intraoperative
Intraoperative
intravascular volume optimisation and length of hospital stay a
intravascular volume optimisation and length of hospital stay a
fter repair of proximal femoral fracture
fter repair of proximal femoral fracture
SV
SV
Flow
Flow
CO
CO
40 patients
Hip replacement
40 patients
Hip replacement
44
Sinclair S, James S, Singer M
British Medical Journal 1997; 315(7113): 909-12
Sinclair S, James S, Singer M
Sinclair S, James S, Singer M
British Medical Journal 1997; 315(7113): 909
British Medical Journal 1997; 315(7113): 909
-
-
12
12
HOS
ac
HOS
ac
Discharge
Discharge
time
time
HOS
HOS
tot
tot
40 patients
Hip replacement
40 patients
45
Keep an eye on costs
Wakeling HG et al. Br J Anaesth 2005: 95(5): 634-42
Intraoperative oesophageal Doppler guided fluid management shortens postoperative hospital stay after major bowel surgery
Wakeling
Wakeling
HG et al. Br J
HG et al. Br J
Anaesth
Anaesth
2005: 95(5): 634
2005: 95(5): 634
-
-
42
42
Intraoperative
Intraoperative
oesophageal Doppler guided fluid management shortens postoperat
oesophageal Doppler guided fluid management shortens postoperat
ive hospital stay after major bowel surgery
ive hospital stay after major bowel surgery
46
$€€ MOR€ THAN OTH€R$
SV
47
Keep an eye on costs
Control
group
Protocol
group
Control
group
Protocol
group
Control
group
Protocol
group
Control
group
Protocol
group
PRELOAD
PRELOAD
Lopes/Angus
Lopes/Angus
Göpfert
Göpfert
Csontos
Csontos
48
Göpfert MS, Reuter DA, Akyol D, Lamm P, Kilger E, Goetz AE.
Goal-directed fluid management reduces vasopressor and catecholamine use in cardiac surgery patients
.
Intensive Care Med 2007; 33: 96-103
Göpfert
Göpfert
MS, Reuter DA,
MS, Reuter DA,
Akyol
Akyol
D,
D,
Lamm
Lamm
P,
P,
Kilger
Kilger
E, Goetz AE.
E, Goetz AE.
Goal
Goal
-
-
directed fluid management reduces
directed fluid management reduces
vasopressor
vasopressor
and catecholamine use in cardiac surgery patients
and catecholamine use in cardiac surgery patients
.
.
Intensive Care Med 2007; 33: 96
Intensive Care Med 2007; 33: 96
-
-
103
103
GEDVi
GEDVi
Less pressors
Less pressors
80 CABG
patients
80 CABG
patients
49
Keep an eye on costs
Lopes MR, Oliveira MA, Pereira VO, Lemos IP, Auler JO Jr, Michard F.
Goal-directed fluid management based on pulse pressure variation monitoring during high risk surgery
Crit Care 2007;11(5):
R100
Lopes MR, Oliveira MA, Pereira VO,
Lopes MR, Oliveira MA, Pereira VO,
Lemos
Lemos
IP,
IP,
Auler
Auler
JO
JO
Jr
Jr
,
,
Michard
Michard
F.
F.
Goal
Goal
-
-
directed fluid management based on pulse pressure variation moni
directed fluid management based on pulse pressure variation moni
toring during high risk surgery
toring during high risk surgery
Crit
Crit
Care 2007;11(5):
Care 2007;11(5):
R100
R100
Less complications
Less complications
33 patients
High risk surgery
33 patients
High risk surgery
Shorter stay
Shorter stay
PPV
50
Csontos C, Foldi V, Fischer T, Bogar L.
Arterial thermodilution in burn patients suggests a more rapid fluid administration during early resuscitation.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2008; 52:742-9
Csontos
Csontos
C,
C,
Foldi
Foldi
V, Fischer T,
V, Fischer T,
Bogar
Bogar
L.
L.
Arterial
Arterial
thermodilution
thermodilution
in burn patients suggests a more rapid fluid administration dur
in burn patients suggests a more rapid fluid administration dur
ing early resuscitation.
ing early resuscitation.
Acta
Acta
Anaesthesiol
Anaesthesiol
Scand 2008; 52:742
Scand 2008; 52:742
-
-
9
9
Less MOF
Less MOF
24 patients
>15% TBSA burns
24 patients
>15% TBSA burns
Higher S
cv
O
2
Higher S
cv
O
2
ITBVi
ITBVi
51
Keep an eye on costs
$€€ MOR€ THAN OTH€R$
SV
52
Control
group
Protocol
group
Control
group
Protocol
group
ORGAN FUNCTION
ORGAN FUNCTION
Mitchell JP et al. Am Rev Respir Dis 1992; 145(5): 990-8
Improved outcome based on fluid management in critically ill patients requiring pulmonary artery catheterization
.
Mitchell JP et al. Am Rev
Mitchell JP et al. Am Rev
Respir
Respir
Dis
Dis
1992; 145(5): 990
1992; 145(5): 990
-
-
8
8
Improved outcome based on fluid management in critically ill pat
Improved outcome based on fluid management in critically ill pat
ients requiring pulmonary artery catheterization
ients requiring pulmonary artery catheterization
.
.
PROTOCOL
52 patients
EVLWi
Fluid resitriction
PROTOCOL
52 patients
EVLWi
Fluid resitriction
CONTROL
49 patients
PAOP
CONTROL
49 patients
PAOP
Mitchell
Mitchell
EVLWi
53
Keep an eye on costs
$€€ MOR€ THAN OTH€R$
SV
GEDVi
EVLWi
54
DO
2
DETERMINANTS
DO
2
55
Keep an eye on costs
DO
2
DO
2
Direct COSTS
Direct COSTS
“…a very small investment for a much greater return…”
56
SvO
2
DETERMINANTS
SvO
2
SvO
2
58
S
cv
O
2
S
cv
O
2
Rivers
59
Keep an eye on costs
Control
group
Protocol
group
Control
group
Protocol
group
OXYGENATION
OXYGENATION
Rivers E. et al. N Engl J Med 2001; 345(19): 1368-77
Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock
Rivers E. et al. N
Rivers E. et al. N
Engl
Engl
J Med 2001; 345(19): 1368
J Med 2001; 345(19): 1368
-
-
77
77
Early goal
Early goal
-
-
directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic sh
directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic sh
ock
ock
PROTOCOL
130 patients
EGDT
PROTOCOL
130 patients
EGDT
CONTROL
133 patients
standard
CONTROL
133 patients
standard
S
cv
O
2
S
cv
O
2
Rivers
Rivers
60
RCCT’s showing benefit
RCCT’s showing benefit
EBM = 17 RCCT’s
61
Keep an eye on costs
$€€ MOR€ THAN OTH€R$
SV
GEDVi
EVLWi
62
YOU NEED TO $P€ND TO…
SAVE LIVES
SAVE
TIME
MONEY
$AV€
SEE MORE
63
Keep an eye on costs
YOU NEED TO $P€ND TO…
64
YOU NEED TO $P€ND TO…
65
Keep an eye on costs
YOU NEED TO $P€ND TO…
67
Keep an eye on costs
Hospital LOS reduction
Hospital LOS reduction
Savings per patient (€)
Savings per patient (€)
1740
2400
1200
1500
1260
200 200 200 200 2001540
2200
1000
1300
1060
Net Savings/patient (€)
Net Savings/patient (€)
69
Keep an eye on costs
WiTH PiCCO
2
YOU
$€€ MOR€ THAN OTH€R$
SV
GEDVi
EVLWi
70
YOU NEED TO $P€ND TO…
SAVE LIVES
SAVE
TIME
MONEY
$AV€
SEE MORE
71
Keep an eye on costs
The
bottom
line
is…
Join the WSACS clinical trials working group
Leave your e-mail at WSACS Booth!
It
is
time
to
pay
attention
www.wsacs.org
June 25-27, 2009
ACS
Update
‐
workshop
ISICEM
– Brussels
23
march
2009
www.intensive.org
Visit the WSACS Booth 11.002!
73
Keep an eye on costs