Data & Analytics in
Internal Audit
© 2014 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered trademarks of KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. NDPPS 144455
1
With You Today
KPMG
■
Brian Greenberg, Director, Data & Analytics-enabled Internal Audit (National)
© 2014 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered trademarks of KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. NDPPS 144455
2
Agenda/Objectives
■
Current Trends in Data & Analytics, Technology and Continuous Auditing
–
Data & Analytics: A Maturity Model
■
Utilizing DA in Internal Audit
–
How to effectively plan an audit to maximize the use of DA
–
Efficiently utilize DA in the execution of core audit activities
■
Transformation into a Data & Analytics-enabled Internal Audit
Organization
■
Talent Management
–
Attributes of a highly effective Internal Audit DA team (in Internal Audit)
– Enabling Your Analytical Mind
© 2014 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered trademarks of KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. NDPPS 144455
3
Why use Data & Analytics in Internal Audit?
■
Continued pressure to “do more with less”
■
Expectations of IA to provide increased value
© 2014 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. 26125NSS
Audit Methodology-based Maturity Model
4
Traditional
Auditing
Ad Hoc
Integrated
Analytics
Continuous Risk
Assessment &
Continuous
Auditing
Integrated
Continuous
Auditing &
Continuous
Monitoring
Continuous
Assurance of
Enterprise Risk
Management
Maturity
Level II
Maturity
Level I
Maturity
Level III
Maturity
Level IV
Maturity
Level V
IA Methodology
IA
Methodology
Strategic analysis
Enterprise risk
assessment
IA plan
development
Execution and
reporting
Continuous
reporting
Data analytics are generally not
used
Data analytics are partially used
but are sub-optimized
Data analytics are effectively and
consistently used (optimized)
© 2014 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered trademarks of KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. NDPPS 144455
5
Current Trends: Data & Analytics, Technology and
Continuous Auditing
■
Convergence of Internal Audit and BI/CA/CM
■
CA/CM strategic development link to enterprise initiatives:
•
Partnering with the business
•
KRIs and KPIs
■
Enterprise Risk Management & Audit planning process
•
Quantitative and/or continuous risk assessment
© 2014 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered trademarks of KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. NDPPS 144455
6
How Internal Audit Is Leveraging Data & Analytics
■
Audit Execution (most common)
•
Meaningful insights; not lists of exceptions
■
Tactical efforts – e.g. FCPA compliance, proactive fraud detection, etc.
■
Audit planning – periodically identify changes in key metrics to drive
dynamic audit planning
■
Pre-fieldwork scoping
■
Adoption of risk-based testing methods instead of traditional sample
testing
© 2014 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered trademarks of KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. NDPPS 144455
7
Data & Analytics-enabled Internal Audit Process
Analytics-Driven
Continuous Risk
Assessment
Dynamic
Audit Plan
D&A enabled
Audit Workplan
D&A Audit
Scoping and
Planning
Data &
Analytics
Audit
Execution
Enhanced
Dynamic
Reporting
Data & Analytics
-enabled Internal
Audit
Operationalize into
repeatable and
sustainable analytics
Business
Monitoring
© 2014 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered trademarks of KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. NDPPS 144455
8
Client Issues to be Solved – Limitations of Traditional
(Audit and/or Enterprise) Risk Assessment Process
How is CRA different?
Continuous Risk
Assessment
■
Proactive
■
Continuous
■
Quantitative-enhanced
■
Dynamic IA Planning
■
Insights into
emerging and
changing risks
Traditional Risk
Assessment
■
Reactive
■
Annual or
Infrequent
■
Qualitative-focused
■
Results in static IA
Plan
© 2014 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered trademarks of KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. NDPPS 144455
9
Quantitative-Enhanced – Continuous Risk Assessment
■
Quantitative metrics (e.g., KPIs,
KRIs) which provide additional
insights for audit plan development
■
Focused on specific audit areas
during planning phase
■
Emerging risks out of IA plan
execution
Examples: Number of new contracts
signed, overtime fluctuations by location
Bottom Up
Start with Auditable Universe
Source: IA findings, system reporting
Top Down
Start with Risk Universe
Source: Management reporting, risk
assessment interviews, ERM results
■
Linkage to Enterprise Wide
Risks and Initiatives
■
Management KRIs/KPIs to
monitor the business
■
Segment/Function Reporting
Example: Target Revenue goals (%/$),
Market Fluctuations
© 2014 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered trademarks of KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. NDPPS 144455
10
Value of Data & Analytics-Enabled Internal Auditing
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Effort
Data & Analytics
Integration
■
Identify the “right” audits for
DA
■
Increase the number of
audits performed per year
■
Decrease the time required
to cycle through the audit
universe
■
Increase the scope of
specific audits
© 2014 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. 26125NSS
Prioritizing Your Audit Plan for Use of Data Analytics
Not a likely
candidate
Possible Candidate
Top Priority
Top Priority
Possible Candidate
Not a likely
candidate
Top Priority
Availability:
Is data available for the audited
process?
No
Comprehension:
Do your resources have the business
knowledge available to understand
the source data?
No
Yes
Data Quality:
Is the data being captured consistent
in nature and complete
No
Risk:
Does the audited process/area
represent a high concentration
of risk?
Complexity:
Is the data being obtained from 3
sources or less?
Is the time required to obtain and
validate the data low?
E.g., audit of a manually
performed control
E.g., audit of a complex
process without front end
support of process owner or IT
No
E.g., exploratory audit
or profile of a process
No
Yes
E.g., OTC
or P2P audit
Yes
Repeatability:
Will the audit be performed multiple
times using a similar data source (e.g.
same ERP or quarterly audit)?
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
E.g., T&E
audit
E.g., P-Card
audit
© 2014 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. 26125NSS
Audit Preparation and Fieldwork
Define Audit Objective(s), Develop Analytics enabled Audit Work Program
Understand the process and transaction flow
Understand underlying data structure and availability
Determine what analytics are relevant in achieving the audit objective(s)
Refine audit work program if necessary and design the analytics based on the work program steps
Define “exceptions”
Audit
Management
Acquire data (extract, transform, load)
Assess data
–
Completeness & Accuracy
–
Quality
Data
Management
Develop and execute analytics (i.e., script, program, etc.)
–
Validate results
Validate with business owner(s)
Confirm audit objective(s) achieved
Refine and re-execute procedures, if necessary
Data
Analytics
Extract
Transform
Load
Assess
Develop
Execute
Validate
Refine
Research exceptions
Interpret results – “tell the story”
Follow-up with process owners
Determine root cause
Issue Audit Report – present results and consider future continuous auditing relevance
Issue Pilot Results – Compared to success criteria
Analyze and
Report
Integrating data &
analytics
© 2014 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered trademarks of KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. NDPPS 144455
14
Audit Cycle Enabled with Data & Analytics
Planning /
Scoping
Fieldwork
Enhanced
Reporting
• Workplan
• Data Request
• Data Validation
• Data Transformation
• Pre-Fieldwork Scoping
• Analytics Execution
• Aggregation of Results
• Interpretation of Results
• Validation of Results
• Risk Profiling and Analytics
• Performance Profiling and
Analytics
© 2014 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered trademarks of KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. NDPPS 144455
15
Planning / Scoping
■
Calculate population statistics
■
Stratify (histogram)
■
Relationships (PO vs Invoice
count)
■
Heat map (identify outliers)
■
Data Discovery Tools
■
Understand and map the data
flow
Days Sales Outstanding by Location
0
20
40
60
80
100
Location 7
Location 20
Location 16
Location 11
Location 2
Location 3
Location 5
Location 14
Location 4
Location 13
Days Sales Outstanding
Country
Sales
Commissions
Commission
Percentage
CN
1,399,454
31,902
2%
LT
960,425
28,812
3%
KW
845792
42,289
5%
OM
452,965
22,648
5%
© 2014 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered trademarks of KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. NDPPS 144455
16
Fieldwork
■
Process walkthrough
•
Ask questions based on insights from analytics
■
Detailed testing
•
Include highest risk samples identified during analytics
■
Perform additional analytics to support the audit objectives /
observations
© 2014 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered trademarks of KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. NDPPS 144455
17
Example of Traditional Audit Analytics
Traditional analytic techniques generate one spreadsheet per test
Routines:
1.
Missing Receipts
2.
Late Expense Submissions
3.
Potential Duplicate Submissions
4.
Suspicious Keyword Search
© 2014 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered trademarks of KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. NDPPS 144455
18
© 2014 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered trademarks of KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. NDPPS 144455
19
© 2014 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered trademarks of KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. NDPPS 144455
20
© 2014 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered trademarks of KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. NDPPS 144455
21
© 2014 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered trademarks of KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. NDPPS 144455
22
© 2014 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered trademarks of KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. NDPPS 144455
23
Key Questions To Consider
Which departments had the highest rate of indicators?
Which employees seemed to violate the policy most frequently?
Are there transactions that were identified in multiple tests?
Aggregation and data visualization allows auditors to dynamically review
the results of analysis by drilling into multiple dimensions within a single
screen.
© 2014 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered trademarks of KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. NDPPS 144455
24
Reporting
Analytic
Unvalidated
Results
Potential
Impact
($)
Payment Line
Without Vendor
4,748
7,821,454
Voucher Line
without PO
4,734
6,335,398
Receipt Not
Completely
Vouchered
3,791
5,973,342
Invalid PO
1,215
3,995,356
Voucher Line /
Receipt
Mismatch
2,646
3,012,094
PO Line Not
Completely
Received
397
2,949,804
Payment
Without PO
324
2,778,010
Suspicious
Voucher
Processing Date
545
1,192,493
Analytic
Unvalidated
Results
Potential
Impact
($)
Validated
Results
Impact
($)
Payment Line
Without Vendor
4,748
7,821,454
782
561,912
Voucher Line
without PO
4,734
6,335,398
750
1,783,129
Receipt Not
Completely
Vouchered
3,791
5,973,342
3,791
5,973,342
Invalid PO
1,215
3,995,356
187
234,783
Voucher Line /
Receipt
Mismatch
2,646
3,012,094
1,543
2,673,527
PO Line Not
Completely
Received
397
2,949,804
0
0
Payment
Without PO
324
2,778,010
0
0
Suspicious
Voucher
Processing Date
545
1,192,493
54
842,942
• Avoid reporting
un-validated analytics
Don’t just present
results, tell a story
Transformation into a
Data &
Analytics-enabled Internal Audit
Organization
© 2014 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. 26125NSS
If it were that easy…
■
Data & Analytics Challenges
•
Access to quality data
•
Analytics not achieving audit objectives
■
It’s not about “Big Data” Tools
•
There is no silver bullet
•
Can’t buy success
■
Successful use of analytics relies on
•
Change in Mindset
•
Skilled Resources
•
Integrated Methodology
•
Managing Time and Expectations
© 2014 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. 26125NSS
Where and How to Begin?
Refine Strategy/Roadmap
Audit Planning versus Audit Execution
Quantitative-enhanced, Continuous Risk Assessment Process to Facilitate Dynamic Audit
Planning
Audit Execution
Annual Audit Plan Prioritization – Green, Yellow, Red
Audit work program Analytics Enablement
Macro analytics for scoping
Micro analytics for audit execution
Link analytics-based test to audit objective
Consider repeatable and sustainable opportunities (e.g., continuous auditing/monitoring)
Penetrate and radiate across the audit universe
Pilot process
Develop Tactical Plans
© 2014 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. 26125NSS
Transformation of Traditional Internal Audit to a Robust
Data Analytics Enabled Program – Roadmap
Define the objectives you are trying to achieve
Identify key stakeholders and define the success criteria and related measurements
Build an effective business case
Consider use of a pilot to validate strategy and support business case
Develop a
Strategic
Plan
Design governance and reporting structure for continuous auditing activities
Evaluate data analytic skills and competencies
Integrate data analysis into IA methodology and processes
Evaluate and select technology tools
Consider use of a pilot to validate tactical plans
Develop
Tactical
Plans
Manage organizational change (internal to Internal Audit and business facing change)
Design and deliver trainings
Identify focus areas for implementation to satisfy strategic objectives
Design and establish data connection/extract; analysis; and reporting mechanisms including
risk-and performance-based analytics, dashboards, scorecards, reports risk-and alerts, etc.
Design and
Execute
Implementat
ion Plans
Manage organizational change (internal to Internal Audit and business facing change)
Regularly evaluate program for effectiveness and refine as necessary
Consider additional areas for expansion and maturity
Evaluate opportunities to extend into the business
Continuous
Program
Evaluation/
© 2014 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered trademarks of KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. NDPPS 144455
Transformation of Traditional Internal Audit to a Robust Data Analytics
Enabled Program
When transforming a traditional internal audit program to a robust DA enabled program, consider People, Process
and Technology
Compile a profile/job description for
personnel required for the DA
program
Identify personnel within the
organization that have the required
experience/skills; consider other
sourcing opportunities if required
skills/experience are not resident
within IA
Develop a training program
–
Techniques
–
Tools
–
Results Interpretation
Develop program “champions” by
providing personnel with the
appropriate skills/experience with
the training program
Develop a DA audit methodology,
including:
–
Risk Assessment
–
Audit Candidate Profile
–
Procedures to transform an audit
candidate to a DA enabled
program (e.g., incorporating DA
into planning, scoping,
procedures, etc.)
–
DA reporting
–
Develop DA KPIs
Tool(s) selection
Tool usage maximization
Data availability/understanding/ETL
DA tool obsolescence
monitoring/prevention
© 2014 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered trademarks of KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. NDPPS 144455
Implementation (and sustainability) challenges
General
Determining and establishing consensus on objectives and success criteria
Measuring and demonstrating success
Limited resources (technology and human know how)
Data Availability and Quality
Lack of access to data
Disparate information systems with different data formats
Incomplete data sets, inconsistent data quality
Data privacy/security issues to navigate
Data Analytics
Inability to effectively leverage data analytics to achieve audit objectives
Definition of “exception;” addressing “false positives” and “false negatives
Workflow around exception resolution; managing volumes of exceptions
Change Management
Managing impact of CA/DA processes on auditors and other business processes (e.g., change in mindset,
© 2014 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered trademarks of KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. NDPPS 144455
32
There Is A Learning Curve
Skill
Level
Time and Experience
© 2013 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 192969
33
Critical Thinking and Data Analytics
■ Analytical mind - scientific method approach
■ Understands business process alignment with data flow
■ Embraces technology
■ Curious/inquisitive balanced with disciplined/methodical
■ Trial by fire, willing to learn, to fail, to figure it out
© 2013 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 192969