• No results found

Data & Analytics in Internal Audit. January 13, 2015

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Data & Analytics in Internal Audit. January 13, 2015"

Copied!
36
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Data & Analytics in

Internal Audit

(2)

© 2014 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered trademarks of KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. NDPPS 144455

1

With You Today

KPMG

Brian Greenberg, Director, Data & Analytics-enabled Internal Audit (National)

(3)

© 2014 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered trademarks of KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. NDPPS 144455

2

Agenda/Objectives

Current Trends in Data & Analytics, Technology and Continuous Auditing

Data & Analytics: A Maturity Model

Utilizing DA in Internal Audit

How to effectively plan an audit to maximize the use of DA

Efficiently utilize DA in the execution of core audit activities

Transformation into a Data & Analytics-enabled Internal Audit

Organization

Talent Management

Attributes of a highly effective Internal Audit DA team (in Internal Audit)

– Enabling Your Analytical Mind

(4)

© 2014 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered trademarks of KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. NDPPS 144455

3

Why use Data & Analytics in Internal Audit?

Continued pressure to “do more with less”

Expectations of IA to provide increased value

(5)

© 2014 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. 26125NSS

Audit Methodology-based Maturity Model

4

Traditional

Auditing

Ad Hoc

Integrated

Analytics

Continuous Risk

Assessment &

Continuous

Auditing

Integrated

Continuous

Auditing &

Continuous

Monitoring

Continuous

Assurance of

Enterprise Risk

Management

Maturity

Level II

Maturity

Level I

Maturity

Level III

Maturity

Level IV

Maturity

Level V

IA Methodology

IA

Methodology

Strategic analysis

Enterprise risk

assessment

IA plan

development

Execution and

reporting

Continuous

reporting

Data analytics are generally not

used

Data analytics are partially used

but are sub-optimized

Data analytics are effectively and

consistently used (optimized)

(6)

© 2014 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered trademarks of KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. NDPPS 144455

5

Current Trends: Data & Analytics, Technology and

Continuous Auditing

Convergence of Internal Audit and BI/CA/CM

CA/CM strategic development link to enterprise initiatives:

Partnering with the business

KRIs and KPIs

Enterprise Risk Management & Audit planning process

Quantitative and/or continuous risk assessment

(7)

© 2014 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered trademarks of KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. NDPPS 144455

6

How Internal Audit Is Leveraging Data & Analytics

Audit Execution (most common)

Meaningful insights; not lists of exceptions

Tactical efforts – e.g. FCPA compliance, proactive fraud detection, etc.

Audit planning – periodically identify changes in key metrics to drive

dynamic audit planning

Pre-fieldwork scoping

Adoption of risk-based testing methods instead of traditional sample

testing

(8)

© 2014 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered trademarks of KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. NDPPS 144455

7

Data & Analytics-enabled Internal Audit Process

Analytics-Driven

Continuous Risk

Assessment

Dynamic

Audit Plan

D&A enabled

Audit Workplan

D&A Audit

Scoping and

Planning

Data &

Analytics

Audit

Execution

Enhanced

Dynamic

Reporting

Data & Analytics

-enabled Internal

Audit

Operationalize into

repeatable and

sustainable analytics

Business

Monitoring

(9)

© 2014 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered trademarks of KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. NDPPS 144455

8

Client Issues to be Solved – Limitations of Traditional

(Audit and/or Enterprise) Risk Assessment Process

How is CRA different?

Continuous Risk

Assessment

Proactive

Continuous

Quantitative-enhanced

Dynamic IA Planning

Insights into

emerging and

changing risks

Traditional Risk

Assessment

Reactive

Annual or

Infrequent

Qualitative-focused

Results in static IA

Plan

(10)

© 2014 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered trademarks of KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. NDPPS 144455

9

Quantitative-Enhanced – Continuous Risk Assessment

Quantitative metrics (e.g., KPIs,

KRIs) which provide additional

insights for audit plan development

Focused on specific audit areas

during planning phase

Emerging risks out of IA plan

execution

Examples: Number of new contracts

signed, overtime fluctuations by location

Bottom Up

Start with Auditable Universe

Source: IA findings, system reporting

Top Down

Start with Risk Universe

Source: Management reporting, risk

assessment interviews, ERM results

Linkage to Enterprise Wide

Risks and Initiatives

Management KRIs/KPIs to

monitor the business

Segment/Function Reporting

Example: Target Revenue goals (%/$),

Market Fluctuations

(11)

© 2014 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered trademarks of KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. NDPPS 144455

10

Value of Data & Analytics-Enabled Internal Auditing

Year 1

Year 2

Year 3

Effort

Data & Analytics

Integration

Identify the “right” audits for

DA

Increase the number of

audits performed per year

Decrease the time required

to cycle through the audit

universe

Increase the scope of

specific audits

(12)

© 2014 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. 26125NSS

Prioritizing Your Audit Plan for Use of Data Analytics

Not a likely

candidate

Possible Candidate

Top Priority

Top Priority

Possible Candidate

Not a likely

candidate

Top Priority

Availability:

Is data available for the audited

process?

No

Comprehension:

Do your resources have the business

knowledge available to understand

the source data?

No

Yes

Data Quality:

Is the data being captured consistent

in nature and complete

No

Risk:

Does the audited process/area

represent a high concentration

of risk?

Complexity:

Is the data being obtained from 3

sources or less?

Is the time required to obtain and

validate the data low?

E.g., audit of a manually

performed control

E.g., audit of a complex

process without front end

support of process owner or IT

No

E.g., exploratory audit

or profile of a process

No

Yes

E.g., OTC

or P2P audit

Yes

Repeatability:

Will the audit be performed multiple

times using a similar data source (e.g.

same ERP or quarterly audit)?

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

E.g., T&E

audit

E.g., P-Card

audit

(13)

© 2014 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. 26125NSS

Audit Preparation and Fieldwork

Define Audit Objective(s), Develop Analytics enabled Audit Work Program

Understand the process and transaction flow

Understand underlying data structure and availability

Determine what analytics are relevant in achieving the audit objective(s)

Refine audit work program if necessary and design the analytics based on the work program steps

Define “exceptions”

Audit

Management

Acquire data (extract, transform, load)

Assess data

Completeness & Accuracy

Quality

Data

Management

Develop and execute analytics (i.e., script, program, etc.)

Validate results

Validate with business owner(s)

Confirm audit objective(s) achieved

Refine and re-execute procedures, if necessary

Data

Analytics

Extract

Transform

Load

Assess

Develop

Execute

Validate

Refine

Research exceptions

Interpret results – “tell the story”

Follow-up with process owners

Determine root cause

Issue Audit Report – present results and consider future continuous auditing relevance

Issue Pilot Results – Compared to success criteria

Analyze and

Report

(14)

Integrating data &

analytics

(15)

© 2014 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered trademarks of KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. NDPPS 144455

14

Audit Cycle Enabled with Data & Analytics

Planning /

Scoping

Fieldwork

Enhanced

Reporting

• Workplan

• Data Request

• Data Validation

• Data Transformation

• Pre-Fieldwork Scoping

• Analytics Execution

• Aggregation of Results

• Interpretation of Results

• Validation of Results

• Risk Profiling and Analytics

• Performance Profiling and

Analytics

(16)

© 2014 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered trademarks of KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. NDPPS 144455

15

Planning / Scoping

Calculate population statistics

Stratify (histogram)

Relationships (PO vs Invoice

count)

Heat map (identify outliers)

Data Discovery Tools

Understand and map the data

flow

Days Sales Outstanding by Location

0

20

40

60

80

100

Location 7

Location 20

Location 16

Location 11

Location 2

Location 3

Location 5

Location 14

Location 4

Location 13

Days Sales Outstanding

Country

Sales

Commissions 

Commission 

Percentage

CN

1,399,454 

31,902 

2%

LT

960,425 

28,812

3%

KW

845792

42,289

5%

OM

452,965

22,648

5%

(17)

© 2014 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered trademarks of KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. NDPPS 144455

16

Fieldwork

Process walkthrough

Ask questions based on insights from analytics

Detailed testing

Include highest risk samples identified during analytics

Perform additional analytics to support the audit objectives /

observations

(18)

© 2014 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered trademarks of KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. NDPPS 144455

17

Example of Traditional Audit Analytics

Traditional analytic techniques generate one spreadsheet per test

Routines:

1.

Missing Receipts

2.

Late Expense Submissions

3.

Potential Duplicate Submissions

4.

Suspicious Keyword Search

(19)

© 2014 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered trademarks of KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. NDPPS 144455

18

(20)

© 2014 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered trademarks of KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. NDPPS 144455

19

(21)

© 2014 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered trademarks of KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. NDPPS 144455

20

(22)

© 2014 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered trademarks of KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. NDPPS 144455

21

(23)

© 2014 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered trademarks of KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. NDPPS 144455

22

(24)

© 2014 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered trademarks of KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. NDPPS 144455

23

Key Questions To Consider

Which departments had the highest rate of indicators?

Which employees seemed to violate the policy most frequently?

Are there transactions that were identified in multiple tests?

Aggregation and data visualization allows auditors to dynamically review

the results of analysis by drilling into multiple dimensions within a single

screen.

(25)

© 2014 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered trademarks of KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. NDPPS 144455

24

Reporting

Analytic

Unvalidated

Results

Potential

Impact

($)

Payment Line

Without Vendor

4,748

7,821,454

Voucher Line

without PO

4,734

6,335,398

Receipt Not

Completely

Vouchered

3,791

5,973,342

Invalid PO

1,215

3,995,356

Voucher Line /

Receipt

Mismatch

2,646

3,012,094

PO Line Not

Completely

Received

397

2,949,804

Payment

Without PO

324

2,778,010

Suspicious

Voucher

Processing Date

545

1,192,493

Analytic

Unvalidated

Results

Potential

Impact

($)

Validated

Results

Impact

($)

Payment Line

Without Vendor

4,748

7,821,454

782

561,912

Voucher Line

without PO

4,734

6,335,398

750

1,783,129

Receipt Not

Completely

Vouchered

3,791

5,973,342

3,791

5,973,342

Invalid PO

1,215

3,995,356

187

234,783

Voucher Line /

Receipt

Mismatch

2,646

3,012,094

1,543

2,673,527

PO Line Not

Completely

Received

397

2,949,804

0

0

Payment

Without PO

324

2,778,010

0

0

Suspicious

Voucher

Processing Date

545

1,192,493

54

842,942

• Avoid reporting

un-validated analytics

Don’t just present

results, tell a story

(26)

Transformation into a

Data &

Analytics-enabled Internal Audit

Organization

(27)

© 2014 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. 26125NSS

If it were that easy…

Data & Analytics Challenges

Access to quality data

Analytics not achieving audit objectives

It’s not about “Big Data” Tools

There is no silver bullet

Can’t buy success

Successful use of analytics relies on

Change in Mindset

Skilled Resources

Integrated Methodology

Managing Time and Expectations

(28)

© 2014 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. 26125NSS

Where and How to Begin?

Refine Strategy/Roadmap

Audit Planning versus Audit Execution

Quantitative-enhanced, Continuous Risk Assessment Process to Facilitate Dynamic Audit

Planning

Audit Execution

Annual Audit Plan Prioritization – Green, Yellow, Red

Audit work program Analytics Enablement

Macro analytics for scoping

Micro analytics for audit execution

Link analytics-based test to audit objective

Consider repeatable and sustainable opportunities (e.g., continuous auditing/monitoring)

Penetrate and radiate across the audit universe

Pilot process

Develop Tactical Plans

(29)

© 2014 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. 26125NSS

Transformation of Traditional Internal Audit to a Robust

Data Analytics Enabled Program – Roadmap

Define the objectives you are trying to achieve

Identify key stakeholders and define the success criteria and related measurements

Build an effective business case

Consider use of a pilot to validate strategy and support business case

Develop a

Strategic

Plan

Design governance and reporting structure for continuous auditing activities

Evaluate data analytic skills and competencies

Integrate data analysis into IA methodology and processes

Evaluate and select technology tools

Consider use of a pilot to validate tactical plans

Develop

Tactical

Plans

Manage organizational change (internal to Internal Audit and business facing change)

Design and deliver trainings

Identify focus areas for implementation to satisfy strategic objectives

Design and establish data connection/extract; analysis; and reporting mechanisms including

risk-and performance-based analytics, dashboards, scorecards, reports risk-and alerts, etc.

Design and

Execute

Implementat

ion Plans

Manage organizational change (internal to Internal Audit and business facing change)

Regularly evaluate program for effectiveness and refine as necessary

Consider additional areas for expansion and maturity

Evaluate opportunities to extend into the business

Continuous

Program

Evaluation/

(30)

© 2014 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered trademarks of KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. NDPPS 144455

Transformation of Traditional Internal Audit to a Robust Data Analytics

Enabled Program

When transforming a traditional internal audit program to a robust DA enabled program, consider People, Process

and Technology

Compile a profile/job description for

personnel required for the DA

program

Identify personnel within the

organization that have the required

experience/skills; consider other

sourcing opportunities if required

skills/experience are not resident

within IA

Develop a training program

Techniques

Tools

Results Interpretation

Develop program “champions” by

providing personnel with the

appropriate skills/experience with

the training program

Develop a DA audit methodology,

including:

Risk Assessment

Audit Candidate Profile

Procedures to transform an audit

candidate to a DA enabled

program (e.g., incorporating DA

into planning, scoping,

procedures, etc.)

DA reporting

Develop DA KPIs

Tool(s) selection

Tool usage maximization

Data availability/understanding/ETL

DA tool obsolescence

monitoring/prevention

(31)

© 2014 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered trademarks of KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. NDPPS 144455

Implementation (and sustainability) challenges

General

Determining and establishing consensus on objectives and success criteria

Measuring and demonstrating success

Limited resources (technology and human know how)

Data Availability and Quality

Lack of access to data

Disparate information systems with different data formats

Incomplete data sets, inconsistent data quality

Data privacy/security issues to navigate

Data Analytics

Inability to effectively leverage data analytics to achieve audit objectives

Definition of “exception;” addressing “false positives” and “false negatives

Workflow around exception resolution; managing volumes of exceptions

Change Management

Managing impact of CA/DA processes on auditors and other business processes (e.g., change in mindset,

(32)
(33)

© 2014 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered trademarks of KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. NDPPS 144455

32

There Is A Learning Curve

Skill

Level

Time and Experience

(34)

© 2013 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 192969

33

Critical Thinking and Data Analytics

■ Analytical mind - scientific method approach

■ Understands business process alignment with data flow

■ Embraces technology

■ Curious/inquisitive balanced with disciplined/methodical

■ Trial by fire, willing to learn, to fail, to figure it out

(35)

© 2013 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 192969

34

“Super Auditor” Capabilities

■ Business Acumen

■ Accounting Foundational Skills

■ Process Assessment and Improvement

■ IT Background

■ Data Analytic Specific Core Competencies and Skills

Tool Skills (MS Access, SQL, IDEA, QlikView)

Data Management

(36)

All information provided is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although

we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is

received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act upon such information without appropriate professional advice

after a thorough examination of the particular situation.

© 2014 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms

affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.

The KPMG name, logo and “cutting through complexity” are registered trademarks or trademarks of KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG

International”). NDPPS 144455

Brian Greenberg

KPMG LLP

[email protected]

www.kpmg.com

Sean Mulyanto

KPMG LLP

[email protected]

www.kpmg.com

Thank you

References

Related documents

Protein complexes from GST macro domain 9Tm and mD2 pull-downs with LPS treated RAW- 264.7 extracts were analyzed by western blot in order to validate the interaction partners identi

member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All

Hinchcliff, Mercedez, Examining the complex relationship of customer satisfaction and loyalty within the Australian retail banking market: A multigroup analysis between high

By modelling reserves as demand determined, conditioned on the prevalent interest rates in the economy and allowing the central bank to set the interest rate and then provide

Disclaimer: There may be minor variations in this unit plan or its mirror image due to structural and architectural adjustments in the final layout. The decision of the architect

This study examined whether a quality professional development course, Infusing Technology, influenced teachers‘ integration of technology, their knowledge of digital tools

In “credit card fraud detection with a neural network” paper, Using data from a credit card issuer, a neural network based fraud detection system was trained on a large sample

Cesoie Punzonatrici idrauliche Linee automatiche a CNC di punzonatura, foratura e taglio termico Linee automatiche a CNC di punzonatura e foratura Linee automatiche a