• No results found

Grant Agreement Reference Number:

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Grant Agreement Reference Number:"

Copied!
52
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Name Humeau Charlotte Michael Taen CLEMENT Ivana Nagtegaal Pellet Sonja Roland Schöpf Laura Lutters audrey bedussi Wieneke van Zanten Susana Santos Nickie KAPPS Pauline Rasmus Matthiesen Tinamarie Widen Schimmel Priscilla CELLERIN Clémence DORMONT Marion Lisanne Hein Judith Oesterle Rienk Jager Christian Nielsen Micaela Kottlow Martine Geerts Lise Nyboe roos kwakkel

Iara Lindsay Tavares da Rosa Rob Clarijs SCHWABE Aline Sandra Friedli Christina Ina Hvalsøe João Paixão Cátia Ornelas Lieke Meijer

Rosana Ester Larsen Marianne Næsager Ana Garcia

Hélia Patrícia Tomás Canudo Linda Peters

(2)

Josje van den Brink Rowenna Meier Suzanne Langenbach Nadine Rohner Eva Bladbjerg Line Søfeldt Susana Sofia Abreu Michele Herzog Geertje van Valkenburg Carmen Lana

(3)

Report on students’ evaluation of the IP 2010

Table of contents

Background information

p. 4

Admission

p. 5

Information

p. 7

Arriving in Denmark

p. 10

Day 1 – introduction

p. 12

Rehabilitation in the area of children

p. 14

Rehabilitation in the area of quality of life and functionality

p. 22

Rehabilitation in the area of chronic pain

p. 32

Company visit

p. 39

The social program

p. 41

Students’ projects

p. 46

Lecture by Lone Frimodt

p. 48

Your own contribution

p. 49

(4)

Background information

Average of age and completed years of study

Observeret minimum Observeret maksimum Gennemsnit Respondenter Age 18,00 53,00 25,80 51

Completed years of study 2,00 4,00 2,71 51

Home University

Respondenter Procent HfH, Switzerland 8 15,7

VIA UC, Denmark 8 15,7

Windesheim, The Netherlands 8 15,7

FMH, Portugal 7 13,7

HAN, The Netherlands 8 15,7

ISRP, France 8 15,7 UCC, Copenhagen 4 7,8 I alt 51 100,0%

Gender

Respondenter Procent Female 43 84,3% Male 8 15,7% I alt 51 100,0%

(5)

Admission

How did you get to know about the IP 2010?

Respondenter Procent

From your international coordinator 33 64,7%

From the Head of Studies at your university 18 35,3%

I found out myself 0 0,0%

Other 3 5,9%

I alt 51 100,0%

Did you get the information you needed before applying?

Respondenter Procent

Yes 45 88,2%

No 4 7,8%

Don't know 2 3,9%

I alt 51 100,0%

Was there a deadline for applying?

Respondenter Procent

Yes 42 82,4%

No 5 9,8%

Don't know 4 7,8%

I alt 51 100,0%

When were you told that you had been accepted? If you don't remember exactly, just mark the box that you

think may be the right one

Respondenter Procent

Less than 1 week after the deadline 10 23,8%

2-4 weeks after the deadline 24 57,1%

5-8 weeks after the deadline 5 11,9%

More than 8 weeks after the deadline 3 7,1%

(6)

How long time after you applied, were you told that you had been accepted? If you don't remember exactly,

just mark the box that you think may be the right one

Respondenter Procent

Less than a week 12 23,5%

1-4 weeks 29 56,9%

5-8 weeks 6 11,8%

More than 8 weeks 4 7,8%

(7)

Information

From your international coordinator, before arriving at Randers

To what extent did you get information about ECTS points

Respondenter Procent

To a very high extent 11 21,6%

To a high extent 12 23,5% To some extent 12 23,5% To a little extent 5 9,8% Not at all 7 13,7% Don't know 4 7,8% I alt 51 100,0%

To what extent did you get information about sending a signed document of data and ID

Respondenter Procent

To a very high extent 11 21,6%

To a high extent 23 45,1% To some extent 15 29,4% To a little extent 1 2,0% Not at all 1 2,0% Don't know 0 0,0% I alt 51 100,0%

To what extent did you get information about economy

Respondenter Procent

To a very high extent 5 9,8%

To a high extent 13 25,5% To some extent 17 33,3% To a little extent 14 27,5% Not at all 2 3,9% Don't know 0 0,0% I alt 51 100,0%

(8)

To what extent did you get - Information about the program of the IP

Respondenter Procent

To a very high extent 9 17,6%

To a high extent 20 39,2% To some extent 17 33,3% To a little extent 2 3,9% Not at all 1 2,0% Don't know 2 3,9% I alt 51 100,0%

To what extent did you get information about travelling

Respondenter Procent

To a very high extent 6 11,8%

To a high extent 16 31,4% To some extent 7 13,7% To a little extent 9 17,6% Not at all 3 5,9% Don't know 0 0,0% Danish student 10 19,6% I alt 51 100,0%

To what extent did you get information about accommodation

Respondenter Procent

To a very high extent 2 3,9%

To a high extent 8 15,7% To some extent 20 39,2% To a little extent 10 19,6% Not at all 1 2,0% Don't know 0 0,0% Danish student 10 19,6% I alt 51 100,0%

Did you get the information you needed from your international coordinator before arriving at Randers?

Respondenter Procent

Yes 43 84,3%

(9)

I alt 51 100,0%

Did all the information from your international coordinator prove to be correct?

Respondenter Procent

Yes 41 80,4%

No 7 13,7%

Don't know 3 5,9%

I alt 51 100,0%

Information from VIA UC, Randers before arrival

Did you visit the IP website www.psychomotortherapy.eu?

Respondenter Procent

Yes 48 94,1%

No 3 5,9%

Don't know 0 0,0%

I alt 51 100,0%

To what extent did you find the information you needed on our website?

Respondenter Procent

To a very high extent 9 18,8%

To a high extent 28 58,3% To some extent 11 22,9% To a little extent 0 0,0% Not at all 0 0,0% Don't know 0 0,0% I alt 48 100,0%

Did you get the information you needed from VIA UC Randers about arrival?

Respondenter Procent

Yes 43 84,3%

No 4 7,8%

Don't now 4 7,8%

(10)

Arriving in Denmark

Please evaluate the issues below on a scale from 1 to 10 where 10 is the best score and 1 the lowest

How was your trip to Denmark?

Respondenter Procent 10 3 5,9% 9 6 11,8% 8 10 19,6% 7 5 9,8% 6 8 15,7% 5 2 3,9% 4 2 3,9% 3 2 3,9% 2 0 0,0% 1 2 3,9% Don't know 11 21,6% I alt 51 100,0%

How was your reception by Stine/Frans?

Respondenter Procent 10 9 17,6% 9 6 11,8% 8 10 19,6% 7 11 21,6% 6 6 11,8% 5 1 2,0% 4 0 0,0% 3 0 0,0% 2 0 0,0% 1 0 0,0% Don't know 8 15,7% I alt 51 100,0%

(11)

How was your accommodation?

Respondenter Procent 10 3 5,9% 9 6 11,8% 8 10 19,6% 7 11 21,6% 6 6 11,8% 5 1 2,0% 4 3 5,9% 3 1 2,0% 2 0 0,0% 1 0 0,0% Don't know 10 19,6% I alt 51 100,0%

How was the food at Danhostel?

Respondenter Procent 10 0 0,0% 9 0 0,0% 8 8 15,7% 7 6 11,8% 6 9 17,6% 5 4 7,8% 4 2 3,9% 3 6 11,8% 2 4 7,8% 1 0 0,0% Don't know 12 23,5% I alt 51 100,0%

(12)

Day 1 - Introduction

Please evaluate the questions below on a scale from 1 to 10 where 10 is the best score and 1 the lowest -

How was the presentation of the program and practical info by Charlotte and Helle?

Respondenter Procent 10 6 11,8% 9 7 13,7% 8 17 33,3% 7 12 23,5% 6 2 3,9% 5 2 3,9% 4 1 2,0% 3 0 0,0% 2 0 0,0% 1 0 0,0% Don't know 4 7,8% I alt 51 100,0%

How was the introduction to the university colleges?

Respondenter Procent 10 3 5,9% 9 9 17,6% 8 15 29,4% 7 12 23,5% 6 4 7,8% 5 5 9,8% 4 0 0,0% 3 0 0,0% 2 0 0,0% 1 0 0,0% Don't know 3 5,9% I alt 51 100,0%

(13)

How was the "get to know each other" by Frans and Stine?

Respondenter Procent 10 5 9,8% 9 8 15,7% 8 14 27,5% 7 13 25,5% 6 2 3,9% 5 4 7,8% 4 0 0,0% 3 0 0,0% 2 0 0,0% 1 0 0,0% Don't know 5 9,8% I alt 51 100,0%

(14)

Rehabilitation in the area of children

Literature

Did you read the literature of the workshops before the first day of the workshops?

Respondenter Procent Yes, all of it 19 37,3% Some of it 28 54,9% No 4 7,8% Don't remember 0 0,0% I alt 51 100,0%

How did you find the literature of the course? - Not only practice makes perfect

Respondenter Procent Very difficult 0 0,0% Difficult 4 7,8% Appropriate 27 52,9% Easy 13 25,5% Very easy 2 3,9% Don't know 0 0,0% Haven't read 5 9,8% I alt 51 100,0%

How did you find the literature of the course? - Early development

Respondenter Procent Very difficult 1 2,0% Difficult 4 7,8% Appropriate 25 49,0% Easy 10 19,6% Very easy 6 11,8% Don't know 0 0,0% Haven't read 5 9,8% I alt 51 100,0%

(15)

What was difficult about the literature? You may choose more answers

Respondenter Procent

The language was on a high level 16 31,4%

The theories were complicated 8 15,7%

Other reasons 14 27,5%

Don't know 18 35,3%

I alt 51 100,0%

How did you find the amount of literature?

Respondenter Procent

Much too much 3 5,9%

Too much 11 21,6%

Appropriate 35 68,6%

Too small 0 0,0%

Far too small 0 0,0%

Don't know 2 3,9%

I alt 51 100,0%

To what extent did the literature provide you with new theoretical knowledge? - Not only practice makes

perfect

Respondenter Procent

To a very high extent 0 0,0%

To a high extent 9 17,6% To some extent 28 54,9% To a little extent 7 13,7% Not at all 1 2,0% Don't know 1 2,0% Haven't read 5 9,8% I alt 51 100,0%

(16)

To what extent did the literature provide you with new theoretical knowledge? - Early development

Respondenter Procent

To a very high extent 0 0,0%

To a high extent 9 17,6% To some extent 24 47,1% To a little extent 10 19,6% Not at all 2 3,9% Don't know 2 3,9% Haven't read 4 7,8% I alt 51 100,0%

Teaching

How well did you understand the teaching by Séverine, Karoline and Susanne?

Respondenter Procent

Very well 10 19,6%

Well 26 51,0%

Appropriately 13 25,5%

Not very well 1 2,0%

Did not understand at all 1 2,0%

Don't know 0 0,0%

I alt 51 100,0%

Why did you not understand much of the teaching? You may choose more answers

Respondenter Procent The language was difficult to understand 2 100,0%

The theories presented were complicated 0 0,0%

I had not read the texts prior to the teaching 0 0,0%

Other 0 0,0%

Don't know 0 0,0%

(17)

To what extent did the teaching differ compared to what you are used to? - Workshop with Karoline and

Susanne

Respondenter Procent

To a very high extent 5 9,8%

To a high extent 12 23,5% To some extent 18 35,3% To a little extent 7 13,7% Not at all 8 15,7% Don't know 1 2,0% I alt 51 100,0%

To what extent did the teaching differ compared to what you are used to? - Workshop with Séverine

Respondenter Procent

To a very high extent 3 5,9%

To a high extent 7 13,7% To some extent 17 33,3% To a little extent 9 17,6% Not at all 14 27,5% Don't know 1 2,0% I alt 51 100,0%

To what extent was the teaching inspiring? - Workshop with Karoline and Susanne

Respondenter Procent

To a very high extent 7 13,7%

To a high extent 29 56,9% To some extent 13 25,5% To a little extent 1 2,0% Not at all 1 2,0% Don't know 0 0,0% I alt 51 100,0%

To what extent was the teaching inspiring? - Workshop with Séverine

Respondenter Procent

To a very high extent 1 2,0%

To a high extent 14 27,5% To some extent 14 27,5% To a little extent 10 19,6% Not at all 12 23,5% Don't know 0 0,0% I alt 51 100,0%

(18)

To what extent did it seem that the teachers cooperated (had cooperated before the IP) ?

Respondenter Procent

To a very high extent 3 5,9%

To a high extent 13 25,5% To some extent 26 51,0% To a little extent 6 11,8% Not at all 2 3,9% Don't know 1 2,0% I alt 51 100,0%

To what extent was the teaching practical?

Respondenter Procent

To a very high extent 3 5,9%

To a high extent 17 33,3% To some extent 27 52,9% To a little extent 3 5,9% Not at all 1 2,0% Don't know 0 0,0% I alt 51 100,0%

To what extent was the teaching theoretical?

Respondenter Procent

To a very high extent 0 0,0%

To a high extent 22 43,1% To some extent 25 49,0% To a little extent 4 7,8% Not at all 0 0,0% Don't know 0 0,0% I alt 51 100,0%

What do you think about the balance between theory and practice of the teaching?

Respondenter Procent

Far too much theory 0 0,0%

Too much theory 20 39,2%

Appropriate 27 52,9%

Too much practice 3 5,9%

Far too much practice 0 0,0%

Don't know 1 2,0%

(19)

Methods

How were the methods and practices that you were presented to - in relation to understanding

Respondenter Procent Very good 10 19,6% Good 20 39,2% Okay 18 35,3% Less good 2 3,9% Poor 0 0,0% Don't know 1 2,0% I alt 51 100,0%

How were the methods and practices that you were presented to - in relation to usability

Respondenter Procent Very good 6 11,8% Good 21 41,2% Okay 21 41,2% Less good 1 2,0% Poor 0 0,0% Don't know 2 3,9% I alt 51 100,0%

How were the methods and practices that you were presented to in relation to provide you with new

knowledge about methods and practices

Respondenter Procent Very good 6 11,8% Good 17 33,3% Okay 22 43,1% Less good 4 7,8% Poor 2 3,9% Don't know 0 0,0% I alt 51 100,0%

(20)

Your overall evaluation of the theory (literature) of this topic and methods (practices)

Respondenter Procent Very good 1 2,0% Good 27 52,9% Okay 21 41,2% Less good 1 2,0% Poor 1 2,0% Don't know 0 0,0% I alt 51 100,0%

Benefit

The focus on the IP is on differences, similarities and integration.

To what extent did these two days make you aware of the differences in PMT in different countries?

Respondenter Procent

To a very high extent 6 11,8%

To a high extent 25 49,0% To some extent 16 31,4% To a little extent 4 7,8% Not at all 0 0,0% Don't know 0 0,0% I alt 51 100,0%

To what extent did these two days make you aware of similarities in PMT in different countries?

Respondenter Procent

To a very high extent 2 3,9%

To a high extent 26 51,0% To some extent 15 29,4% To a little extent 8 15,7% Not at all 0 0,0% Don't know 0 0,0% I alt 51 100,0%

(21)

To what extent did these two days enable you to integrate new knowledge - that is apply it to the project and

tell about it at home?

Respondenter Procent

To a very high extent 0 0,0%

To a high extent 22 43,1% To some extent 17 33,3% To a little extent 10 19,6% Not at all 1 2,0% Don't know 1 2,0% I alt 51 100,0%

(22)

Rehabilitation in the area of quality of life and

functionality

Literature

Did you read the literature of the workshops before the first day of the workshops?

Respondenter Procent Yes, all of it 12 24,0% Some of it 29 58,0% No 9 18,0% Don't remember 0 0,0% I alt 50 100,0%

How did you find the literature of the course? - Quality of Life and IDD

Respondenter Procent Very difficult 1 2,0% Difficult 7 14,0% Appropriate 23 46,0% Easy 5 10,0% Very easy 3 6,0% Don't know 0 0,0% Haven't read 11 22,0% I alt 50 100,0%

How did you find the literature of the course? - Anger and depression

Respondenter Procent Very difficult 0 0,0% Difficult 1 2,0% Appropriate 19 38,0% Easy 13 26,0% Very easy 7 14,0% Don't know 0 0,0% Haven't read 10 20,0% I alt 50 100,0%

(23)

How did you find the literature of the course? - Emotional stages of recovery

Respondenter Procent Very difficult 0 0,0% Difficult 3 6,0% Appropriate 20 40,0% Easy 11 22,0% Very easy 3 6,0% Don't know 0 0,0% Haven't read 13 26,0% I alt 50 100,0%

How did you find the literature of the course? - How the brain is hurt

Respondenter Procent Very difficult 0 0,0% Difficult 1 2,0% Appropriate 15 30,0% Easy 17 34,0% Very easy 5 10,0% Don't know 0 0,0% Haven't read 12 24,0% I alt 50 100,0%

How did you find the literature of the course? - How the brain works

Respondenter Procent Very difficult 0 0,0% Difficult 3 6,0% Appropriate 16 32,0% Easy 9 18,0% Very easy 7 14,0% Don't know 0 0,0% Haven't read 15 30,0% I alt 50 100,0%

(24)

How did you find the literature of the course? - Memory

Respondenter Procent Very difficult 0 0,0% Difficult 3 6,0% Appropriate 15 30,0% Easy 10 20,0% Very easy 6 12,0% Don't know 0 0,0% Haven't read 16 32,0% I alt 50 100,0%

What was difficult about the literature? You may choose more answers

Respondenter Procent

The language was on a high level 14 28,0%

The theories were complicated 8 16,0%

Other reasons 10 20,0%

Don't know 22 44,0%

I alt 50 100,0%

How did you find the amount of literature?

Respondenter Procent

Much too much 4 8,0%

Too much 14 28,0%

Appropriate 28 56,0%

Too small 0 0,0%

Far too small 0 0,0%

Don't know 4 8,0%

I alt 50 100,0%

To what extent did the literature provide you with new theoretical knowledge? - Quality of Life and IDD

Respondenter Procent

To a very high extent 1 2,0%

To a high extent 9 18,0% To some extent 21 42,0% To a little extent 6 12,0% Not at all 2 4,0% Don't know 0 0,0% Haven't read 11 22,0%

(25)

To what extent did the literature provide you with new theoretical knowledge? - Anger and depression

Respondenter Procent

To a very high extent 0 0,0%

To a high extent 8 16,0% To some extent 26 52,0% To a little extent 6 12,0% Not at all 1 2,0% Don't know 0 0,0% Haven't read 9 18,0% I alt 50 100,0%

To what extent did the literature provide you with new theoretical knowledge? - Emotional stages of recovery

Respondenter Procent

To a very high extent 1 2,0%

To a high extent 10 20,0% To some extent 21 42,0% To a little extent 4 8,0% Not at all 1 2,0% Don't know 0 0,0% Haven't read 13 26,0% I alt 50 100,0%

To what extent did the literature provide you with new theoretical knowledge? - How the brain is hurt

Respondenter Procent

To a very high extent 1 2,0%

To a high extent 7 14,0% To some extent 19 38,0% To a little extent 9 18,0% Not at all 2 4,0% Don't know 0 0,0% Haven't read 12 24,0% I alt 50 100,0%

(26)

To what extent did the literature provide you with new theoretical knowledge? - How the brain works

Respondenter Procent

To a very high extent 1 2,0%

To a high extent 7 14,0% To some extent 17 34,0% To a little extent 7 14,0% Not at all 4 8,0% Don't know 1 2,0% Haven't read 13 26,0% I alt 50 100,0%

To what extent did the literature provide you with new theoretical knowledge? - Memory

Respondenter Procent

To a very high extent 1 2,0%

To a high extent 6 12,0% To some extent 19 38,0% To a little extent 6 12,0% Not at all 3 6,0% Don't know 0 0,0% Haven't read 15 30,0% I alt 50 100,0%

Teaching

How well did you understand the teaching by Sofia and Bart?

Respondenter Procent

Very well 30 60,0%

Well 18 36,0%

Appropriately 1 2,0%

Not very well 1 2,0%

Did not understand at all 0 0,0%

Don't know 0 0,0%

(27)

Why did you not understand much of the teaching? You may choose more answers

Respondenter Procent The language was difficult to understand 2 100,0%

The theories presented were complicated 0 0,0%

I had not read the texts prior to the teaching 0 0,0%

Other 0 0,0%

Don't know 0 0,0%

I alt 2 100,0%

To what extent did the teaching differ compared to what you are used to? - Workshop with Sofia

Respondenter Procent

To a very high extent 7 14,0%

To a high extent 12 24,0% To some extent 18 36,0% To a little extent 7 14,0% Not at all 6 12,0% Don't know 0 0,0% I alt 50 100,0%

To what extent did the teaching differ compared to what you are used to? - Workshop with Bart

Respondenter Procent

To a very high extent 7 14,0%

To a high extent 12 24,0% To some extent 17 34,0% To a little extent 12 24,0% Not at all 2 4,0% Don't know 0 0,0% I alt 50 100,0%

To what extent was the teaching inspiring? - Workshop with Sofia

Respondenter Procent

To a very high extent 19 38,0%

To a high extent 17 34,0% To some extent 11 22,0% To a little extent 1 2,0% Not at all 2 4,0% Don't know 0 0,0% I alt 50 100,0%

(28)

To what extent was the teaching inspiring? - Workshop with Bart

Respondenter Procent

To a very high extent 16 32,0%

To a high extent 18 36,0% To some extent 13 26,0% To a little extent 2 4,0% Not at all 1 2,0% Don't know 0 0,0% I alt 50 100,0%

To what extent did it seem that the teachers cooperated (had cooperated before the IP)?

Respondenter Procent

To a very high extent 6 12,0%

To a high extent 28 56,0% To some extent 13 26,0% To a little extent 2 4,0% Not at all 0 0,0% Don't know 1 2,0% I alt 50 100,0%

To what extent was the teaching practical?

Respondenter Procent

To a very high extent 5 10,0%

To a high extent 14 28,0% To some extent 24 48,0% To a little extent 6 12,0% Not at all 1 2,0% Don't know 0 0,0% I alt 50 100,0%

To what extent was the teaching theoretical?

Respondenter Procent

To a very high extent 5 10,0%

To a high extent 32 64,0%

To some extent 11 22,0%

To a little extent 2 4,0%

Not at all 0 0,0%

(29)

What do you think about the balance between theory and practice of the teaching?

Respondenter Procent

Far too much theory 3 6,0%

Too much theory 9 18,0%

Appropriate 37 74,0%

Too much practice 1 2,0%

Far too much practice 0 0,0%

Don't know 0 0,0%

I alt 50 100,0%

Methods

How were the methods and practices that you were presented to - in relation to understanding

Respondenter Procent Very good 17 34,0% Good 19 38,0% Okay 12 24,0% Less good 1 2,0% Poor 0 0,0% Don't know 1 2,0% I alt 50 100,0%

How were the methods and practices that you were presented to - in relation to usability

Respondenter Procent Very good 11 22,0% Good 22 44,0% Okay 16 32,0% Less good 1 2,0% Poor 0 0,0% Don't know 0 0,0% I alt 50 100,0%

(30)

How were the methods and practices that you were presented to- in relation to provide you with new

knowledge about methods and practices

Respondenter Procent Very good 6 12,0% Good 22 44,0% Okay 20 40,0% Less good 2 4,0% Poor 0 0,0% Don't know 0 0,0% I alt 50 100,0%

Your overall evaluation of the theory (literature) of this topic and methods (practices)

Respondenter Procent Very good 11 22,0% Good 30 60,0% Okay 8 16,0% Less good 1 2,0% Poor 0 0,0% Don't know 0 0,0% I alt 50 100,0%

Benefit

The focus on the IP is on differences, similarities and integration. To what extent did these two days make

you aware of the differences in PMT in different countries?

Respondenter Procent

To a very high extent 11 22,0%

To a high extent 23 46,0% To some extent 13 26,0% To a little extent 2 4,0% Not at all 1 2,0% Don't know 0 0,0% I alt 50 100,0%

(31)

To what extent did these two days make you aware of similarities in PMT in different countries?

Respondenter Procent

To a very high extent 9 18,0%

To a high extent 22 44,0% To some extent 16 32,0% To a little extent 2 4,0% Not at all 1 2,0% Don't know 0 0,0% I alt 50 100,0%

To what extent did these two days enable you to integrate new knowledge - that is apply it to the project and

tell about it at home?

Respondenter Procent

To a very high extent 8 16,0%

To a high extent 21 42,0% To some extent 17 34,0% To a little extent 3 6,0% Not at all 1 2,0% Don't know 0 0,0% I alt 50 100,0%

(32)

Rehabilitation in the area of chronic pain

Literature

Did you read the literature of the workshops before the first day of the workshops?

Respondenter Procent Yes, all of it 11 22,0% Some of it 25 50,0% No 13 26,0% Don't remember 1 2,0% I alt 50 100,0%

How did you find the literature of the course? - Action proneness

Respondenter Procent Very difficult 4 8,0% Difficult 8 16,0% Appropriate 17 34,0% Easy 3 6,0% Very easy 0 0,0% Don't know 2 4,0% Haven't read 16 32,0% I alt 50 100,0%

How did you find the literature of the course? - The Fear-Avoidance Model

Respondenter Procent Very difficult 4 8,0% Difficult 6 12,0% Appropriate 19 38,0% Easy 4 8,0% Very easy 1 2,0% Don't know 2 4,0% Haven't read 14 28,0% I alt 50 100,0%

(33)

What was difficult about the literature? You may choose more answers

Respondenter Procent

The language was on a high level 16 32,0%

The theories were complicated 11 22,0%

Other reasons 7 14,0%

Don't know 24 48,0%

I alt 50 100,0%

How did you find the amount of literature?

Respondenter Procent

Much too much 3 6,0%

Too much 8 16,0%

Appropriate 30 60,0%

Too small 0 0,0%

Far too small 0 0,0%

Don't know 9 18,0%

I alt 50 100,0%

To what extent did the literature provide you with new theoretical knowledge? - Action proneness

Respondenter Procent

To a very high extent 2 4,0%

To a high extent 13 26,0% To some extent 16 32,0% To a little extent 2 4,0% Not at all 0 0,0% Don't know 2 4,0% Haven't read 15 30,0% I alt 50 100,0%

To what extent did the literature provide you with new theoretical knowledge? - The Fear-Avoidance Model

Respondenter Procent

To a very high extent 3 6,0%

To a high extent 13 26,0% To some extent 15 30,0% To a little extent 4 8,0% Not at all 0 0,0% Don't know 2 4,0% Haven't read 13 26,0% I alt 50 100,0%

(34)

Teaching

How well did you understand the teaching by Karin and Lia?

Respondenter Procent

Very well 14 28,0%

Well 20 40,0%

Appropriately 11 22,0%

Not very well 4 8,0%

Did not understand at all 0 0,0%

Don't know 1 2,0%

I alt 50 100,0%

Why did you not understand much of the teaching? You may choose more answers

Respondenter Procent The language was difficult to understand 2 100,0%

The theories presented were complicated 0 0,0%

I had not read the texts prior to the teaching 0 0,0%

Other 0 0,0%

Don't know 0 0,0%

I alt 2 100,0%

To what extent did the teaching differ compared to what you are used to? - Workshop with Karin

Respondenter Procent

To a very high extent 5 10,0%

To a high extent 16 32,0% To some extent 16 32,0% To a little extent 9 18,0% Not at all 2 4,0% Don't know 2 4,0% I alt 50 100,0%

To what extent did the teaching differ compared to what you are used to? - Workshop with Lia

Respondenter Procent

To a very high extent 4 8,0%

To a high extent 20 40,0% To some extent 12 24,0% To a little extent 10 20,0% Not at all 2 4,0% Don't know 2 4,0% I alt 50 100,0%

(35)

To what extent was the teaching inspiring? - Workshop with Karin

Respondenter Procent

To a very high extent 6 12,0%

To a high extent 23 46,0% To some extent 15 30,0% To a little extent 4 8,0% Not at all 1 2,0% Don't know 1 2,0% I alt 50 100,0%

To what extent was the teaching inspiring? - Workshop with Lia

Respondenter Procent

To a very high extent 8 16,0%

To a high extent 20 40,0% To some extent 16 32,0% To a little extent 4 8,0% Not at all 1 2,0% Don't know 1 2,0% I alt 50 100,0%

To what extent did it seem that the teachers cooperated (had cooperated before the IP)?

Respondenter Procent

To a very high extent 7 14,0%

To a high extent 23 46,0% To some extent 15 30,0% To a little extent 2 4,0% Not at all 0 0,0% Don't know 3 6,0% I alt 50 100,0%

To what extent was the teaching practical?

Respondenter Procent

To a very high extent 10 20,0%

To a high extent 21 42,0% To some extent 15 30,0% To a little extent 2 4,0% Not at all 1 2,0% Don't know 1 2,0% I alt 50 100,0%

(36)

To what extent was the teaching theoretical?

Respondenter Procent

To a very high extent 3 6,0%

To a high extent 17 34,0% To some extent 23 46,0% To a little extent 6 12,0% Not at all 0 0,0% Don't know 1 2,0% I alt 50 100,0%

What do you think about the balance between theory and practice of the teaching?

Respondenter Procent

Far too much theory 0 0,0%

Too much theory 3 6,0%

Appropriate 43 86,0%

Too much practice 3 6,0%

Far too much practice 0 0,0%

Don't know 1 2,0%

I alt 50 100,0%

Methods

How were the methods and practices that you were presented to - in relation to understanding

Respondenter Procent Very good 8 16,0% Good 28 56,0% Okay 9 18,0% Less good 3 6,0% Poor 0 0,0% Don't know 2 4,0% I alt 50 100,0%

(37)

How were the methods and practices that you were presented to - in relation to usability

Respondenter Procent Very good 5 10,0% Good 27 54,0% Okay 14 28,0% Less good 0 0,0% Poor 1 2,0% Don't know 3 6,0% I alt 50 100,0%

How were the methods and practices that you were presented to - in relation to provide you with new

knowledge about methods and practices

Respondenter Procent Very good 9 18,0% Good 21 42,0% Okay 14 28,0% Less good 3 6,0% Poor 2 4,0% Don't know 1 2,0% I alt 50 100,0%

Your overall evaluation of the theory (literature) of this topic and methods (practices)

Respondenter Procent Very good 7 14,0% Good 24 48,0% Okay 15 30,0% Less good 2 4,0% Poor 0 0,0% Don't know 2 4,0% I alt 50 100,0%

(38)

Benefit

The focus on the IP is on differences, similarities and integration. To what extent did these two days make

you aware of the differences in PMT in different countries?

Respondenter Procent

To a very high extent 7 14,0%

To a high extent 27 54,0% To some extent 10 20,0% To a little extent 5 10,0% Not at all 0 0,0% Don't know 1 2,0% I alt 50 100,0%

To what extent did these two days make you aware of similarities in PMT in different countries?

Respondenter Procent

To a very high extent 5 10,0%

To a high extent 20 40,0% To some extent 20 40,0% To a little extent 4 8,0% Not at all 0 0,0% Don't know 1 2,0% I alt 50 100,0%

To what extent did these two days enable you to integrate new knowledge - that is apply it to the project and

tell about it at home?

Respondenter Procent

To a very high extent 8 16,0%

To a high extent 19 38,0% To some extent 18 36,0% To a little extent 3 6,0% Not at all 1 2,0% Don't know 1 2,0% I alt 50 100,0%

(39)

Company visit

Which company did you visit?

Respondenter Procent Holmehulen 6 12,0% SOS Huset 8 16,0% AMU Center 8 16,0% Odder Højskole 13 26,0% Facet 6 12,0% Høskovkollegiet 9 18,0% Don't remember 0 0,0% I alt 50 100,0%

How did the practical issues work? - Information

Respondenter Procent

Very well 27 54,0%

Well 16 32,0%

Okay 6 12,0%

Not very well 0 0,0%

It didn't work at all 0 0,0%

Don't know 1 2,0%

I alt 50 100,0%

How did the practical issues work? - Transportation

Respondenter Procent

Very well 28 56,0%

Well 12 24,0%

Okay 8 16,0%

Not very well 0 0,0%

It didn't work at all 0 0,0%

Don't know 2 4,0%

(40)

To what extent did the visit give you an insight into how a Danish PMT works

Respondenter Procent

To a very high extent 17 34,0%

To a high extent 23 46,0% To some extent 9 18,0% To a little extent 0 0,0% Not at all 0 0,0% Don't know 1 2,0% I alt 50 100,0%

To what extent did the visit increase your knowledge about the profession

Respondenter Procent

To a very high extent 13 26,0%

To a high extent 19 38,0% To some extent 16 32,0% To a little extent 1 2,0% Not at all 0 0,0% Don't know 1 2,0% I alt 50 100,0%

Follow-up Thursday morning: To what extent was it fruitful to listen to other students' company visit

Respondenter Procent

To a very high extent 11 22,0%

To a high extent 28 56,0% To some extent 7 14,0% To a little extent 0 0,0% Not at all 0 0,0% Don't know 4 8,0% I alt 50 100,0%

(41)

The social program

The purpose of the social program was partly to make you feel easy about each other and partly to show you

a small piece of Denmark. From these purposes how do you evaluate the social program on a scale from 1

to 10 where 10 is the best score and 1 the lowest. Monday: Get to know each other

Respondenter Procent 10 7 14,0% 9 6 12,0% 8 11 22,0% 7 17 34,0% 6 5 10,0% 5 0 0,0% 4 1 2,0% 3 0 0,0% 2 0 0,0% 1 0 0,0% Didn't participate 3 6,0% I alt 50 100,0%

Monday : sightseeing in Randers

Respondenter Procent 10 1 2,0% 9 3 6,0% 8 10 20,0% 7 11 22,0% 6 7 14,0% 5 6 12,0% 4 2 4,0% 3 0 0,0% 2 1 2,0% 1 0 0,0% Didn't participate 9 18,0% I alt 50 100,0%

(42)

Tuesday: Wellness with Charlotte and Helle

Respondenter Procent 10 8 16,0% 9 10 20,0% 8 15 30,0% 7 7 14,0% 6 3 6,0% 5 1 2,0% 4 0 0,0% 3 0 0,0% 2 0 0,0% 1 0 0,0% Didn't participate 6 12,0% I alt 50 100,0%

Wednesday: Dinner

Respondenter Procent 10 1 2,0% 9 8 16,0% 8 10 20,0% 7 11 22,0% 6 6 12,0% 5 3 6,0% 4 0 0,0% 3 0 0,0% 2 1 2,0% 1 0 0,0% Didn't participate 10 20,0% I alt 50 100,0%

(43)

Friday: Dinner

Respondenter Procent 10 5 10,0% 9 4 8,0% 8 6 12,0% 7 12 24,0% 6 9 18,0% 5 3 6,0% 4 0 0,0% 3 0 0,0% 2 1 2,0% 1 0 0,0% Didn't participate 10 20,0% I alt 50 100,0%

Saturday: Aarhus - The old Town

Respondenter Procent 10 10 20,0% 9 8 16,0% 8 6 12,0% 7 10 20,0% 6 4 8,0% 5 0 0,0% 4 0 0,0% 3 0 0,0% 2 2 4,0% 1 1 2,0% Didn't participate 9 18,0% I alt 50 100,0%

(44)

Saturday: Aarhus - Aros

Respondenter Procent 10 8 16,0% 9 10 20,0% 8 7 14,0% 7 9 18,0% 6 0 0,0% 5 1 2,0% 4 1 2,0% 3 0 0,0% 2 0 0,0% 1 0 0,0% Didn't participate 14 28,0% I alt 50 100,0%

Sunday: Randers Rainforest

Respondenter Procent 10 10 20,0% 9 10 20,0% 8 10 20,0% 7 5 10,0% 6 1 2,0% 5 1 2,0% 4 1 2,0% 3 0 0,0% 2 0 0,0% 1 0 0,0% Didn't participate 12 24,0% I alt 50 100,0%

(45)

Sunday : Vorup Enge

Respondenter Procent 10 7 14,0% 9 10 20,0% 8 8 16,0% 7 4 8,0% 6 2 4,0% 5 1 2,0% 4 0 0,0% 3 0 0,0% 2 0 0,0% 1 2 4,0% Didn't participate 16 32,0% I alt 50 100,0%

Tuesday : Dinner

Respondenter Procent 10 5 10,0% 9 9 18,0% 8 3 6,0% 7 14 28,0% 6 4 8,0% 5 2 4,0% 4 1 2,0% 3 0 0,0% 2 1 2,0% 1 0 0,0% Didn't participate 11 22,0% I alt 50 100,0%

(46)

Students' projects

Did the description (the paper "Students' projects") make it clear to you what the project should comprise of?

Respondenter Procent

To a very high extent 2 4,0%

To a high extent 17 34,0% To some extent 27 54,0% To a little extent 3 6,0% Not at all 0 0,0% Don't know 1 2,0% I alt 50 100,0%

How was the cooperation in your group?

Respondenter Procent

Excellent 10 20,0%

Good 24 48,0%

Okay 11 22,0%

Not very good 3 6,0%

It didn't work at all 1 2,0%

Don't know 1 2,0%

I alt 50 100,0%

What was it like to transform your knowledge into a project?

Respondenter Procent

Very easy 2 4,0%

Easy 12 24,0%

Neither easy nor hard 22 44,0%

Somewhat hard 12 24,0%

Very hard 1 2,0%

Don't know 1 2,0%

(47)

Your own evaluation of your presentation of the project

Respondenter Procent

It was excellent 0 0,0%

It was good 36 72,0%

It was neither good or poor 10 20,0%

It was less good 2 4,0%

It was poor 0 0,0%

Don't know 2 4,0%

I alt 50 100,0%

Did you feel supported by the supervisors? (Cor, Gerard or Lone)

Respondenter Procent

To a very high extent 10 20,0%

To a high extent 22 44,0% To some extent 12 24,0% To a little extent 2 4,0% Not at all 2 4,0% Don't know 2 4,0% I alt 50 100,0%

Do you feel ready to carry out your program of teaching/presentation when you return to your university

college?

Respondenter Procent

Yes, I am totally ready 12 24,0%

Yes, I am almost ready 28 56,0%

I am not ready now, but I will be ready at the time 8 16,0%

No, I will need more time 0 0,0%

No, I am not ready and I don't think I will be ready 0 0,0%

Don't know 2 4,0%

(48)

Lecture by Lone Frimodt

- President of European Forum

Did you find the lecture inspiring?

Respondenter Procent

To a very high extent 3 6,0%

To a high extent 19 38,0% To some extent 9 18,0% To a little extent 5 10,0% Not at all 1 2,0% Don't know 13 26,0% I alt 50 100,0%

Did you find the lecture valuable for your education?

Respondenter Procent

To a very high extent 7 14,0%

To a high extent 16 32,0% To some extent 11 22,0% To a little extent 2 4,0% Not at all 1 2,0% Don't know 13 26,0% I alt 50 100,0%

(49)

Your own contribution

Before the start of the IP - Reading literature

Please evaluate the issues below on a scale from 10 to 1 where 10 is the best score and 1 is the lowest

Respondenter Procent 10 1 2,0% 9 6 12,0% 8 7 14,0% 7 9 18,0% 6 12 24,0% 5 6 12,0% 4 2 4,0% 3 3 6,0% 2 2 4,0% 1 2 4,0% I alt 50 100,0%

Before the start of the IP -Finding information on the IP homepage

Respondenter Procent 10 6 12,0% 9 14 28,0% 8 18 36,0% 7 6 12,0% 6 2 4,0% 5 2 4,0% 4 0 0,0% 3 1 2,0% 2 0 0,0% 1 1 2,0% I alt 50 100,0%

(50)

Before the start of the IP - Finding information in general about the IP

Respondenter Procent 10 5 10,0% 9 8 16,0% 8 21 42,0% 7 4 8,0% 6 7 14,0% 5 2 4,0% 4 1 2,0% 3 1 2,0% 2 0 0,0% 1 1 2,0% I alt 50 100,0%

During the IP - Active participation in the workshops

Respondenter Procent 10 5 10,0% 9 12 24,0% 8 19 38,0% 7 13 26,0% 6 1 2,0% 5 0 0,0% 4 0 0,0% 3 0 0,0% 2 0 0,0% 1 0 0,0% I alt 50 100,0%

During the IP - Being initiator of the work in groups

Respondenter Procent 10 3 6,0% 9 8 16,0% 8 16 32,0% 7 14 28,0% 6 5 10,0% 5 2 4,0% 4 2 4,0% 3 0 0,0% 2 0 0,0% 1 0 0,0% I alt 50 100,0%

(51)

Your overall opinion of the IP

Please evaluate the IP on a scale from 1 to 10, where 10 is the highest and 1 the lowest

Respondenter Procent 10 0 0,0% 9 16 32,0% 8 22 44,0% 7 9 18,0% 6 3 6,0% 5 0 0,0% 4 0 0,0% 3 0 0,0% 2 0 0,0% 1 0 0,0% I alt 50 100,0%

Was the IP well-organized?

Respondenter Procent

To a very high extent 14 28,0%

To a high extent 28 56,0% To some extent 6 12,0% To a little extent 2 4,0% Not at all 0 0,0% Don't know 0 0,0% I alt 50 100,0%

Did you get an answer if you were in doubt of anything during the IP?

Respondenter Procent

Yes 43 86,0%

No 1 2,0%

Don't know 2 4,0%

Was not in doubt 4 8,0%

(52)

Did you feel welcome and at home at VIA UC, Randers?

Respondenter Procent

To a very high extent 17 34,0%

To a high extent 27 54,0% To some extent 5 10,0% To a little extent 0 0,0% Not at all 0 0,0% Don't know 1 2,0% I alt 50 100,0%

References

Related documents