• No results found

Proposal for an Amendment to Rule 104 (1) of the Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament tabled by Mr G B Patterson pursuant to Rule 112 of the Rules of Procedure Working Documents 1982 83, Document 1 798/82, 27 October 1982

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Proposal for an Amendment to Rule 104 (1) of the Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament tabled by Mr G B Patterson pursuant to Rule 112 of the Rules of Procedure Working Documents 1982 83, Document 1 798/82, 27 October 1982"

Copied!
12
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

European Communities

EUROPEAN

PARLIAMENT

Wbrking

Documents

t982-

I

983

27 October 198? DocufulENT 1-798t92

PROPOSAL FOR AN AI'IENDI'IENT

to

Ru[e 104

(1)

of

the

RuLes

of

procedure

of

the

European ParLiament

tabted by fitr G.

B.

PATTERSoN

pursuant

to

Rute 11?

of

the

Rutes

of

procedure

English Edition

i

(2)

RuLe 104 (1)

Add:

rtllith

the exception

of

extraordinary committee meetings, the date

and venue

of

committee meetings shaLL be

fixed

at

Least one month

in

advanceTand may onLy be changed

in

exceptionaI circumstances.'

Justification

It

shoutd

not

be possibte

at

short notice

through a

for

the

venue

of

a meeting

to

be changed

snap

vote

in

the

committee concerned.

(3)

W?-,?X'U

European Communities

EUROPEAN

PARLIAMENT

S/orking Documents

t982-

1983

3

November 1982 Docur{ENT 1-799182

Report

drawn up on behatf

of

the

Committee on Energy and

Research

on

the

proposal from

the

Commission

of

the

European

Conmunities

to

the

Counci[ (Doc. 1-5??182

-C0M(82) 362

finaL)

for

a

decision on

a

five-year

research and deveLopment programme

in

the

fiel.d

of

appLied

metrotogy and reference materiaLs

-

non-nuctear

indirect action

(1983

-

1987)

Rapporteur:

ltlr G. SCHITIID

English b.dition

(4)
(5)

By

tetter of

8.luLy

198? the Pr:eeidcht

of

the

CounciL

of

the

Europcan

Communitics consu[tcd

the

Europcan ParIiamcnt on the proposa( from the

Commission

of

the

European Communities

to

the

CounciI

for

a

five-year

research and devetopment programme

in

the

fieLd

of

appLied metrotogy and

'reference materiats

-

nonlnuc[ear,

indirect action

(19E3

-

19E7).

0n 13 September 1982

the

President

of

thc

European ParLiament referred

this

proposal

to

the

Co'hmittee on Energy and Research as

the

committee

responsib[e and

to

the

Committee on Eudgets, the^ Committee on Economic and

Itlonetary

Affa'irs,

and

the

Committee on

thc

Environment, PubLic HcaLth and Consumer Protection

for their

opinions.

At

its

meeting

of

24 Septembcr 1982

thc

Committee on Energy and Research appointed I'lr Gerhard SCHI{ID repportcur.

At

rits mecting

of

19 October 1982

the

comnritt?e considered

the

Commission proposaI and

the

draft

report

and decided unanimousty

to

recommend that

ParLiament shou[d approve

the

Commission proposaL

cs

amended by

the

foL[oring

proposed amendments.

The Commission informed

the

committee

that

it

uoutd

not

accept Amendrrent

No. 1

but

was prepared

to

accept Amendments Nos.

2

and 3.

The committee then adoptcd

the

mot{on

for

a

rcsolution

as a rhote

unanimousty.

'l'he f ot Iowing took

part

in

the

votG

:

ttlrs

tlaIz

(chai rman); tttr Ga[ [agher,

ltlr Setigman, and

llr

IppoLito

(vice-chairmen)

;

tt'lr Schmid, rapporteuri Ittr CoLLeseLLi (deputizing

for

Mr Sassano), ftlr FLanagan,

ltlr

Fuchs,

f{r

Kettett-Bowman (deputizing

for

ttlr Normanton), ftlr

Lator,

t{r

ttlULter-Hermann, [tlr

Pattison,

Mr Pearce (deputizing

for

Mr ttlore[and), ltlr Petronio, ttlrs PhIix,

Mr

Pintat,

Mr

Purvis,

ltlr Rinsche, ltlr Rogers (deputizing

for

ltlr Adam),

ttlr

Stl.zer,

Mrs Theobatd-Paoti,

Ilr

Vandemeutcbroucke (deputizing

for

ttlr Capanna),

and ltlrs Weber (deputizing

for

ttlr RogaLta).

The opinions

of

the

Committee on Budgets and

thc

Committee on

the

Environm?nt,

PubIic

]leatth

and Consumer Protection are

attached.

The

opinion

of

the

Committee on Economic and ilonetary

Affairs

uiLL be detivered

oratty

in

ptenary

sitting

during

the

debate on

the

report

pursuant

to

Rute 101(5)

of

the

Rutes

of

Procedure.

(6)

A.

B.

CONTEI{TS

Paoe

*

AiIENDI,IENTS

...

5

l,loTION toR A RESOLUTION

...

7

EXPLANATORY STATETIENT

...

E

Opinion

of

the

Coamittee on Budgcts

..."...."'

9

opinion

of

the

Committee on

thc

EnvironnGtlt, PubLic

Heal,th and COnSUmef

Protection

...

10

(7)

The Committee on Energy and

European ParIiament

the fo[loring

lution,

together

vith

exptanatory

I.ETI -EEqPJ!Eq-qI -88&

IA!E!I

Amend as

fottors.:

4c!is!e-?

The necessary funds

for

the

totaL

duration

of

the

programme

are

estimated

at

34.0

mittion

ECU and

the

staff

requi red

at !7-L!!.A.-1-8.-I-gl.

The European monetary

unit is

defined

in

the

Financiat

Regulation

in

force.

These

figures

have

onty

indicative

va lue.

Reseirch'hereby' submits

to

the amendments and motion

for

a

reso-statement:

COUNCIL TEXT

EB9E99At-EgB-4- ggUNgIt-9EgISIgU

{Egod'!e-o!-[q,=-'!-argreLe.-?

4r!ig!e-?

The necessary funds

for

the

tota,l

duration

of

the

pro-

.,

gramme .afe estimated

at

34.7 ,

miLtion

ECU and

the staff

required

at

20.

The European monetary

unit

is

defined

in

the

Financiat

Regulation

in

force.

These

figures

have

onty

indi-cative

vatue.

Sseadueo!-Ns"-? 4cgig!s-1 8!-tJE-beginnlng-gI-!he-!hicd-veer-!he

gsuuissieo-sbe!!-ssbgl!-e!-ingeciu

repgr!-9!-!!e-resg!!s-eJ-!h9-Pr99leEBe.

8-!ine!-csvier-el-!hs-presrerue-shq!!

!!Le-p!ese-Dx-!he-end-e1-!he-!htrd

rei!r,--Ihis-cevieu-ghe!!-be-sartied-es!

bv-erpsr!s-!he-ics-0e!-ueobers-e!-!be

eesEi!!ee-reletrsd-!e-i!-lr!is!e-I-end

have-ne!-reseived-aov-lsnds-!ces-!he regeergb-gcgsreEEga-3od-s3u-!eed-!e-e

rsv!9i90-g!-!be-pr99t9089:--l-c

gegr!-sn

ghe-cevieu-aBd-pes:!ble-cevisren-she!!

be-oede-!e- ghe-EsrepeeD-eer!iquen!

-Acgig!e-t

During

the

third

year

the

pro-gramme shaLt be revieued and

vhere necessary revised in

accordance

rith

the

appropriate procedure and

after

consuIt-ation

of

the

Advisory Committee on Programme [tlanagement.

(8)

T EII-EEqPg SE9-E!-IEE-E!B$!!E!I

SESECEE!!-!es-I

Add

the

fot[oring

to

the

annex :

gigseqine!ign-eI-!!ndings

The

findinqs

and reference materiaI

---pregssed-!s-per!-e!-lhe-ecesEEss

shl!!-Ee-lhe-preesr!r-e!-!hs

Esrseeao-geossni!v=--Ihe-9euoiss!9!

-lhe

return

I he-9eEE!

gsieo-!h!!!-be-resee!s!b!e

for

disscmination and sate.

At{i{Ex

COUNCIL TEXT

8?r-e!!9-previ

Irssrs!-e!-!bi

(9)

A

I'IOTION FOR A RESOLUTION

cLosing

the

procedure

for

consuttation

of

the

European ParLiament on the

,

proposat from

the

Commission

of

the

European Communities

to

the

Councit

.

for

a

decision on

a five-year

research and development programme

in

the

fietd

of

apptied metrotogy and reference

materia[s

-

non-nuclear

indirect

action

(1983

-

1987)

The Eurooean ParIiament,

-

having regard

to

the

proposa[ from

the

Cornmission

of

the

European

Communities (C0l{

G?>

36? f inaL)1,

-havingbeenconsul.tedbytheCouncit(Doc.1-5??182>,

-

having regard

to

the report

of its

Committee on Energy and Research and

the

opinions

of

the

Committee on Budgets, Committee on Economic and ilonetary

Affairs

and Committee on

the

Environment, PubLic HeaLth

and Consumer

Protection (Doc'

1-79918?),

-

having regard

to

the resu[t

of

the

votes on

the

proposaL from the

Commi ssion;

1.

CaL[s on

the

Commission

to

incorporate

the

amendments proposed by the European Partianent;

2.

Expects

the

counciL

to

adopte

the

duLy arnended version;

3.

RecaLLs

in

this

connection

its

budgetary powers;

4.

Instructs

its

president

to

foruard

to

the

Commission and

the

CounciI

the

proposal from

the

Commission as voted by ParLiament and the

correspondingresol.utionasParLiament.sopinion.

1

oJ

tto.

c

1B?, 22 JuLy 1982,

p-

8

(10)

B

EXPLAilATORY STATEFIENT

1.

AI!,I OF THE PROGRAT'IIIE

The aim

of

the

progranme

is to

reduce divergences

in

the resutts

of

measurements and chedrical analyses

in

cases

rhere

:

-

the

disagreenents

are

sources

of

barriers

to

the

functioning

of

the comnon market

or

difficulties in its

retations with

non-member

'

countries,

-

therc

is

a

simuttaneous arareness

in

the

ltlember States

of

the

inadequacy

of

the

means

of

caLibFation and uhere

the

economic need

for

harmonization

cat[s

for

Community

action

in

preference

to

other

initiatives.

The progranme

is

to

exploit aLI the

technicat

and

scientific

resources

spread throughout

the

ComunitY.

2.

AI'|ENDf'IENTS

(a)

Given

the

generatLy

difficutt

budget

situation

and

in

the

interests

of

economy,

the

increase

in staff

should be

kept

to

the

mininum necessary

(2 Ar

lC).

In particutar,

the

head

of

division

shouLd be responsib[e

for

other

duties

yithin

the

programme, uhich voutd avoid

the

need

for

further

Posts.

(b)

To ensure transparency and monitoring

of

the

programme,

it is

essentiat

that

it

shoutd be revieyed

during

its

third

year

by

independent experts and

that

the

European Parliament shoutd be consutted on

the resutts

of

this

review and any possibte changes.

(c)

As

the

Commission

itsetf

rightLy points

out,

too

tittte

attention

has

been

paid

untiL

nou

to

the

dissemination

of

findings

and

the

sale

of reference

materiat.

Greater

efforts

in this

fieLd

are

urgentLy needed

if

the

programme

is to

comp[y

uith

sound business

principtes

as

regards

the

use

of

findings.

(11)

l

'I

OPINION OF THE COfiIITITTEE ON BUDGETS

Letter

from

the

chairman

of

the

Committee on Budgets

to

the

chairman of

the

Comnrittee on Energy and Research

Luxembourg, 12 October 1982*

Subiect

:

ProposaL from

the

Commission

to

the

CounciI

for

a

draft

decision

4t*

adopting

a

Community research and devetopment programme

in

the

fiel.d

of

appLied metrotogy and reference

materiats

(Community

Bureau

of

References

-

BCR)

-

(1983

-

19E7> (Doc. 1-52?18?>

Dear filrs I'latz

At

its

meeting

of

?9t30 September 1982

the

Committee on Budgets considerer

the

abovementioned Commission proposat.

The programme proposed HouLd

require

expenditure

totaLl.ing

34.7 mECU over

a oeriod

of

iive

years and

a

staff

compLement

of

20

officials.

As

Articte

2

states,

these

figures

have

on[y indicative

vatue.

The Committee on Budgets unanimousty approved

the

Commission proposat.

( s i gnature)

The

foLtoting

took

part

in

the

vote: llr

Lange, chairnan;

l'lrs

BarbarelLa, vice

chairman;

t{r

Adonnino, [tlr Neyton Dunn, trlr Langes,

]lr

0rlandi,

ltlr Pfennig,

t{r

Konrad SchUn and Itlr Simonnet.

-9-

PEE0.650lfin.

t,

I

I

(12)

oPINIoN qF THE CoMII|TTTEE 0N THE ENVIRoNIUIENT PUBLIC HEALTH

AND CONSU}IER PROTECTION

Letter

from

the

chairman

of

the

committee

to

the

chairman

of

the

Committee on

Energy and Research

27 October 198?

Diar

ilrs

Ua[z

At

its

meeting

of

19 October 1982

the

Committee on

the

Environment,

PubLic HeaIth and Consumer

Protection

considered

the

proposaI on research and

devetopment

in

the

fietd

of

applied metrotogy and reference materiats

(Doc. 1-52?182).

It

once again stressed

the

fact

that effective

imptementation

of

recent

directives

on environment

protection

and

pubtic

heatth

can

on[y

be guaranteed

if

the

whote Community uses reference

materiats

and

identicat

metrotogicat

methods

yhich are the

most appropriate

for

the situations

which actuatLy

arise.

In

particular

in

the fieLd

of

pot[ution

by heavy metals

([ead,

cadmium, rnercury,

nicket,

chrornium), organic compounds

(pesticides, dioxins,

PCBrs), and gases and

in

the fieLd

of

noise

prevention,

e[ectromagnetic

radiation,

the

restriction

of

undesirabLe substances

in

foodstuffs

and

the

risk of

exposure

to

dangerous substances

at

uork,

cooperation

is

more than ever necessary.

In

order

to

ensure

real

progress

in

these

areas,

the

committee considers

that

a

favourabte

opinion

shoutd be deLivered on

this

programme.

Kenneth

D.

COLLINS

Chai rman

The foLLowing

took

part

in

the

vote:

ttlr CoLLins (chairman),

llr

ltlcftlartin,

t{r

Johnson and ttlrs }feber (vice-chairmen), [Ylr ALber, ftlr Berkhourer, Mr Bombard, Mr Det Duca,

llr

Ghergo, ltliss Hooper, Mrs Lentz-Cornette, ltlr lluntingh,

lrlr trordmann,

ilrs

Pantazi,

ttr

Remi t

Ly,

Mrs SchLei

cher,

ttlrs Scrivener, Flr Sherlock, [tlrs Spaak, ]tlrs SquarciaLupi, ltlrs Van Hemetdonck.

References

Related documents

Over-all swimming orientation of Mysidium (15-5 significant sets, 3875 measurements) relative to the e vector plane of the vertical beam of polarized light.. Clear preponderance

An interesting finding of our study was that memory for information presented in the first half of the video was better in a medium arousing context than in a high arousing

Voorbeelden zijn voor perceived barriers „het kost veel tijd om mijn lichaam na een natuurwandeling op teken te controleren‟, en voor cues to action „op het internet heb ik

The increased time required for ovulation in mice kept under cycles with a relatively long dark phase was largely, if not entirely, the result of an in- creased variation

Hypothese 4a, b en c stelden dat de ondersteuning van het management een modererende rol zou spelen in het verband tussen een proactieve houding, opleidingsniveau, functionele

A better comprehension and quality of the models can be achieved by supporting novices in their orientation process of modeling

• Promoting quality of care and scientific research. This organisation is the biggest in the country and has a control power over the providers of Healthcare and Dutch Child

Verband tussen cognities en risicogedrag worden de gemiddelden aangegeven voor telkens het wel of niet gebruiken van