Surety Bonds &Construction Risk
What’s New in Surety
Presentation
Government of Yukon & Yukon Construction Sector
03 March 2016 2
03 March 2016 3
I – THE SURETY INDUSTRY
Surety Companies
• SAC members write 95% + of all bonds in
Canada
– There are hundreds of sureties listed on
OSFI’s website roster – fewer than 20 are
SAC members and they write almost all the
bonds
Surety Brokers
• Look for SAC member brokers – they are
Construction Risk?
Construction Risk = Risk of Contractor Failure
Ongoing global economic uncertainty
Surety Challenge: Uncertainty = more risk
Economic factors now in a permanent state of
flux (e.g.) resource development drives much of
the economy but volatility in every resource
sector is the new normal (potash; oil; gas;
agribusiness)
Gov’ts Addressing ‘Infrastructure Deficits’
Canada will have strong construction spending:
Federal infrastructure commitment $48B over 10 yrs. + Federal Liberals’ additional commitments
Western Provinces and Territories remain committed to infrastructure spending
Larger and longer projects; ‘infrastructure deficits’
Funding challenges for governments at all levels
Many new procurement approaches in an effort to be more innovative, efficient and cost effective:
o Construction Management and alternative financing (P3) o Integrated Project Delivery (IPD)
Unqualified Contractors; the lowest
“irresponsible” bidder
Insolvency of Contractor
Contractor default for non-financial reasons:
Over Extension
Inability to complete
Incapacity of key people
Unpaid subs and suppliers resulting in liens
Warranty problems
From 2010-15, the Surety industry paid out almost
$800 million in claims; more than the previous 10 yrs. 2013 a year to forget:
Loss ratio; 52% - industry unprofitable Premiums flat after two years of decline
Across all lines and all sectors of the country
2014 a record year: DWP $560 M. Loss ratio drops 32 points to 19%.
2015: first half continues the trend; slight increase in premium and loss ratio of 16%.
Note: The industry hit new all-time highs for the value of contracts underwritten in 2014/15 ($75B+)
Continuing growth in Institutional Construction
investment
Challenges await:
Regional Disparity: North & West Down,
East up?
Resource prices: Full impact yet to be felt
Paradigm Shift: AFP’s, P3’s, IPD, etc.
Larger and longer projects
Challenges to small and mid-sized firms
Other Changes Affecting the
Evolving Political Environment
Globalization of the construction industry with
the continuing reduction of trade barriers (e.g.)
Canada Europe Free Trade Agreement
Trans-Pacific Partnership
Participation of large multinationals will
increase completion further.
Bigger, Longer & Tougher
New Federal Government to fund ambitious
infrastructure program; provinces following suit.
New Models of Project Delivery & Procurement
P3’s, AFP’s
Bundling
Building Information Modeling (BIM)
Integrated Project Delivery (IPD)
Mega-Projects becoming the norm
…and Faster
Demand for instantaneous information and
immediate satisfaction.
Pressure for quicker, more expedient resolution
to construction and other business problems.
Options to Protect Against
Construction Risk:
Surety Bonds
Performance Bonds
Labour & Material Payment Bonds
Liquid Security
Irrevocable Letters of Credit
Cash/Negotiable instruments on Deposit
II – Surety Bonds
Surety is not Insurance
INSURANCE
Losses anticipated 2 party agreement;
Insured & Insurer
Premiums actuarially determined
No recourse against insured in the event of loss
SURETY
No losses anticipated 3 party agreement;
Principal, Surety & Obligee
Premiums only a service charge
Surety Bonds: 3 Essential Services
Prequalification:
Assurance that the bonded contractor is qualified for the job for which they are contracted.
Ongoing monitoring (and hidden services): Sureties monitor bonded contractors
continuously and can provide assistance if
needed ($, technical support, accounting, etc.) Security:
Standard Construction Bonds
Prequalification
Prequalification Letter
Bid Bond
Consent of Surety
Security
Performance Bond
III – Surety
New Surety Products – The Business Case
Surety bonds have been around forever – but they are being asked to respond to new procurement methods and changing needs of owners
The surety industry has a well earned reputation as conservative and cautious
Underwriting new and different risks requires new knowledge and data – which is often lacking
Remember the unique surety value proposition: it
always strive to provide true performance security; i.e. providing owners with a completed project in the event of default.
The case for new products – cont’d…
Traditionally, a surety bond will not provide:
Cash-on-demand. There must be a default.
Dispute resolution (that’s covered in the contract)
A “magic lamp” – defaults must be investigated before being remedied
However, there are new realities for owners and contractors (e.g.)
Owners want more control in default situations (schedules, replacement contractors)
Lenders need assurance that big projects won’t be held up due to a default of a key trade or supplier
As a result of these pressures, the surety industry has been innovating at an unprecedented pace in recent years, (e.g.)
SAC’s Enhanced Process Performance Bond SAC’s Multi-Year Renewable Bonds:
Performance
Labour & Material Payment P3 bonds
The new ‘Headstart Bond’
A Caution:
Larger players and alternative procurement methods don’t change one myth: “We don’t need a bond; our contractor is huge.”
“Recent history has shown that construction firms are not too big to fail even though they may have annual revenues
ranging from hundreds of millions to several billions of dollars.”
“There are bonding safeguards to protect project owners and others when a contractor fails.”
Excerpt from “Why Contractors Fail” by Hugh Rice and Arthur Heimbach, FMI Corporation*, 2007
*
Largest provider of management consulting and investment banking forIV – New & Improved…
SAC Performance Bond 2012
SAC consultations with Owners & Contractors; More “certainty” in the claims process.
More responsiveness to a claim
More frequent and effective communication between sureties and owners.
New “enhanced” performance bond provides
construction buyers with more timely &responsive claim service.
SAC Performance Bond 2012
Pre-Demand Conference to allow surety and owner to prevent problems from turning into a default.
Timelines for Surety’s Response:
5 days to acknowledge a statement of default & request information
21 days (from receipt of information) for surety to respond to owner with their response.
Emergency Remedial Work: Allows Owner to address urgent issues (e.g. safety) under the bond.
Post-Demand Conference: Mechanism to minimize or eliminate work stoppages while surety investigates.
Renewable Multi-Year Bonds
First designed for service contracts; e.g. road
maintenance, snow removal – but with longer term contracts becoming more common renewable bonds are now common
Initial Term is open – 2-3 years seems to be the
norm. Renewal Terms are typically 1-2 year periods
The bond ‘automatically renews’ each year
Failure to renew the Bond is not a ‘default’ under the Contract or the Bond
Surety Bonds & P3 Projects
Comprehensive and adequate performance security against construction default on largeP3 projects.
Bonding capacity for big P3s – now accepted by I.O. Broad and flexible protection packages which include:
Professional surety prequalification
Specialty P3 bonds designed by member sureties: Provide liquid / cash on demand protection.
Built-in “fast-track” dispute resolution
Early Response; surety involved pre-default.
Protection for trades & suppliers via the payment bond. Renewable Multi-year bonds provide protection during
Enhanced Payment Bond:
Prompt payment of undisputed amounts Timelines for response to claims
Option to extend protection to the second tier subcontractors and suppliers.
Protection for Liquidated Damages:
Current Bond Language unclear as to treatment of LD’s; jurisprudence inconsistent.
Rider to add coverage for LD’s up to 10% of contract amount.
Owner required to notify surety when LD’s arise.
Code of Best Practices
Sets out standards of professionalism for a
surety’s response to a performance bond claim.
Provides Obligees with a guide to what it can
expect when claiming under a performance
bond.
Incorporates principles of Enhanced Bond:
Prompt Resolution
Pre-default meeting.
Headstart Performance Bond
TM
Created to protect GCs from sub default (competitive alternative to SDI)
Flexibility: Obligee given two mitigation options:
Traditional Option: Surety investigates and implements solution (as in standard bond); or,
Headtstart Option: Obligee implements its own solution
upon surety’s acceptance of Obligee’s completion proposal.
Responsiveness:
First dollar protection(no deductible or co-payment).
e-procurement &e-bonding
Consult Consult Consult: Industry buy-in and engagement is critical; early in the process
Don’t Reinvent the Wheel: are you a software
developer?
Insist on Verifiability:
a true ebond; responsive vendor Scanned pdf???
Take the Time to get it right:
Not difficult just different; Lead time to allow industry to adjust; Mock Tenders, Phase-in Periods
SAC can Assist:
Vendor evaluations
Prompt Payment
Slow payment/non-payment; leading cause of
insolvency and financial distress in construction
industry.
Prompt Payment legislation in U.K. and U.S.;
none in Canada.
Ontario leading the way
Attorney General initiates review of Lien Act; prompt payment to be incorporated
Report to be submitted by March 2016
Where can I access:
SAC’s bond forms; and
Information on current and
developing trends in
Surety?
SURETY ONLINE LEARNING CENTRE
The Surety Online Learning Centre accessible from
SAC website; www.suretycanada.com.
Five learning modules that introduce the basics of surety
bonds and the suretyship process Learn at your own pace.
Ideal for review or for colleagues who can’t attend a “live”