New Developments Summary
ASU enhances credit quality disclosures
Financing receivables and allowance for credit losses
Summary
The FASB recently issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2010-20, Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses, to enhance the disclosures required for financing receivables (for example, loans, trade accounts receivable, notes receivable, and receivables relating to a lessor’s leveraged, direct financing, and sales-type leases) and allowances for credit losses under FASB Accounting Standards Codification™ 310, Receivables. The amended
disclosures are designed to provide more information to financial statement users about the credit quality of a creditor’s financing receivables and the adequacy of its allowance for credit losses. Most of the existing disclosures in ASC 310-10-50 have been amended to require information on a more disaggregated basis.
In addition, the amended guidance in ASU 2010-20 requires disclosure of the following: • Information about the credit quality of financing receivables
• Aging of past due receivables
• The nature and extent of troubled debt restructurings and their effect on the allowance for credit losses
• Significant purchases and sales of financing receivables
Public entities must begin applying most of the new disclosure requirements for periods ending on or after December 15, 2010, while nonpublic entities are not required to comply until periods ending on or after December 15, 2011.
Contents
A. Introduction ... 2 B. Scope ... 2 C. Level of disaggregation ... 3 D. Disclosures ... 3A. Introduction
The FASB has issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2010-20, Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses, to enhance the disclosure requirements in FASB Accounting Standards Codification™ (ASC or Codification) 310, Receivables. The amended disclosures are designed to provide more information to financial statement users about the credit quality of a creditor’s financing receivables and the adequacy of its allowance for credit losses.
Specifically, the amendments require all creditors, including public and nonpublic entities, to disclose information that enables financial statement users to understand the following about a creditor’s portfolio of financing receivables (for example, loans, trade accounts receivable, notes receivable, and receivables relating to a lessor’s leveraged, direct financing, and sales-type leases) and its allowance for losses: • The nature of the credit risk inherent in the receivables
• How the entity analyzes and assesses credit risk to estimate the allowance for credit losses • The changes and reasons for those changes in both the receivables and the allowance for credit
losses
The amended guidance is intended to enhance the consistency and comparability of credit quality and allowance for credit loss disclosures for financing receivables by requiring entities to disclose a greater level of disaggregated information as well as credit quality indicators and information about past due receivables and modifications of financing receivables. These amended disclosure requirements are intended to help users assess an entity’s credit risk exposures and its allowance for credit losses. The guidance in ASU 2010-20 addresses only the disclosure requirements associated with the credit quality of financing receivables and the allowance for credit losses. It does not amend the recognition and measurement requirements for financing receivables. The Board separately issued a proposed ASU, Accounting for Financial Instruments and Revisions to the Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, which addresses measurement and recognition for all financial instruments, including financing receivables.
B. Scope
The guidance in the ASU adds “financing receivable” to the ASC Master Glossary, which it defines as a recorded asset representing a contractual right to receive money either on demand or on fixed or determinable dates. Financing receivables include, but are not limited to, loans, trade accounts
receivable, notes receivable, and receivables related to a lessor’s leveraged, direct financing, and sales-type leases.
Examples of assets that do not qualify as financing receivables include
• Not-for-profit entities’ unconditional promises to give that must be recognized as assets • Beneficial interests in securitized financial assets that either are acquired or recognized by a
transferor as a result of transfer that meets the requirements for sale accounting under ASC 860, Transfers and Servicing
• Debt securities accounted for under ASC 320, Investments – Debt and Equity Securities
exclude certain instruments from the scope of the amended guidance because of their nature as well as cost versus benefit considerations.
C. Level of disaggregation
Entities must disaggregate the required disclosures under the amended guidance by portfolio segment or by class. The amended guidance includes definitions for these two levels of disaggregation:
• Portfolio segment: the level at which an entity develops and documents a systematic methodology for determining its allowance for credit losses (for example, by type of financing receivable, such as mortgage loans and auto loans; by industry; and by risk rates)
Portfolio segment
The definition of a portfolio segment is consistent with the following existing SEC and other regulatory guidance related to the allowance for credit losses:
• SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin 102, Selected Loan Loss Allowance Methodology and Documentation Issues
• 2001 Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC) Interagency Policy Statement on Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses (ALLL) Methodologies and Documentation for Banks and Savings Institutions
• 2002 National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) Interpretive Ruling and Policy Statement (IRPS) on Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses (ALLL) Methodologies and Documentation for Credit Unions
• 2006 FFIEC Interagency Policy Statement on the Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses
• Class of financing receivable: a group of financing receivables, further disaggregated from the
portfolio segment level, that allows the financial statement user to understand the risks inherent in the entity’s financing receivables. A class is determined on the basis of all of the following characteristics of financing receivables:
− Initial measurement attribute, such as amortized cost for originated loans and fair value for loans acquired in a business combination
− Risk characteristics
− Entity’s method for monitoring and assessing credit risk
An entity’s management must use judgment in determining the appropriate portfolio segments and classes of financing receivables, keeping in mind the disclosure objectives in the amended guidance.
D. Disclosures
Accounting policies for loans and trade receivables
Disclosure Applicability
The entity’s policy for charging off uncollectible trade accounts receivable that both (1) have a contractual maturity of one year or less and (2) arose from the sale of goods or services
Loans and trade receivables, except for credit card receivables
Nonaccrual and past due financing receivables
Disclosure Applicability
In the summary of significant accounting policies, information on policies for • Placing financing receivables on
nonaccrual status, if applicable • Recording payments received on
nonaccrual financing receivables, if applicable
• Resuming accrual of interest
• Determining past due or delinquency status
All financing receivables shall be disclosed by class except for the following, which are subject to these disclosure requirements but are not required to be disaggregated by class: • Receivables measured at fair value with
changes in fair value reported in earnings • Receivables measured at the lower of cost
or fair value
• Trade accounts receivable, other than credit card receivables, that both − Have a contractual maturity of one
year or less
− Arose from the sale of goods or services
The recorded investment in financing receivables on nonaccrual status The recorded investment in financing
receivables past due 90 days or more and still accruing
An analysis of the ages of the recorded
investment in financing receivables past due at the end of the reporting period, as determined under the entity’s accounting policy
All financing receivables shall be disclosed by class except for the following, which are not subject to this disclosure requirement: • Receivables measured at fair value with
changes in fair value reported in earnings • Receivables measured at the lower of cost
or fair value
Nonaccrual and past due financing receivables
Disclosure Applicability
year or less
− Arose from the sale of goods or services
Allowance for credit losses related to financing receivables
Disclosure by portfolio segment Applicability
A description of the entity’s accounting policies and methodology used to estimate the
allowance for credit losses, including
• A description of the factors that influenced management’s judgment, including − Historical losses
− Existing economic conditions
• A discussion of risk characteristics relevant to each portfolio segment
• Identification of changes to the accounting policies or methodology from the prior period and the rationale for the change
Financing receivables, except for
• Receivables measured at fair value with changes in fair value reported in earnings • Receivables measured at the lower of cost
or fair value
• Trade accounts receivable, other than credit card receivables, that both − Have a contractual maturity of one
year or less
− Arose from the sale of goods or services
• A lessor’s net investments in leveraged leases
A description of the entity’s policy for charging off uncollectible financing receivables
A reconciliation showing the activity in the allowance for credit losses for each period, including
• The beginning and ending balance • The current period provision
• Direct write-downs charged against the allowance
• Recoveries of amounts previously charged-off
Allowance for credit losses related to financing receivables
Disclosure by portfolio segment Applicability
The amount of significant purchases of financing receivables in each reporting period The amount of significant sales of financing receivables or reclassifications of financing receivables to the held-for-sale category in each reporting period
The balance in the allowance for credit losses and the related recorded investment in financing receivables at the end of each period, disaggregated based on impairment method (including amounts collectively
evaluated for impairment, amounts individually evaluated for impairment, and amounts related to loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality)
Impaired loans that are individually evaluated for impairment
Disclosure by class of financing receivable Applicability
The accounting for impaired loans All loans that meet the definition of an impaired loan in ASC 310-10-35-16 through 35-17 and are individually evaluated for impairment The amount of impaired loans
The recorded investment in impaired loans as of the date of each statement of financial position, as well as the following information: • The amount of recorded investment for
which there is a related allowance for credit losses determined under
ASC 310-10-35, and the amount of that allowance
Impaired loans that are individually evaluated for impairment
Disclosure by class of financing receivable Applicability
The total unpaid principal balance on impaired loans
The entity’s policy for recognizing interest income on impaired loans, and how it records cash receipts
For each period an entity presents results of operations, the following information: • The average recorded investment in
impaired loans
• The related amount of interest income recognized while the loans were impaired • The amount of interest income recognized
on a cash basis while the loans were impaired, if practicable
The entity’s policy for determining which loans to assess for impairment under ASC 310-10-35
The factors the entity considered in determining that the loan is impaired
Credit quality information
Disclosure by class of financing receivable Applicability
Information that enables financial statement users to both (1) understand how and to what extent management monitors the quality of its financing receivables and (2) assess the quantitative and qualitative risks arising from the credit quality of its financing receivables. Therefore, entities must disclose quantitative and qualitative information about the credit
Financing receivables, except for
• Receivables measured at fair value with changes in fair value reported in earnings • Receivables measured at the lower of cost
or fair value
Credit quality information
Disclosure by class of financing receivable Applicability
quality of financing receivables, including • A description of the credit quality indicator1 • The recorded investment in financing
receivables by credit quality indicator • The date or range of dates on or during
which the information was updated for each credit quality indicator
credit card receivables, that both − Have a contractual maturity of one
year or less
− Arose from the sale of goods or services
Qualitative information about how internal risk ratings2 relate to the likelihood of loss, if the entity discloses internal risk ratings
Modifications
Disclosure by class of financing receivable Applicability
Qualitative and quantitative information about troubled debt restructurings of financing receivables that occurred during each period, including
• How the entity modified the financing receivables
• The financial effects of the modifications
A creditor’s troubled debt restructurings of financing receivables, except for
• Receivables measured at fair value with changes in fair value reported in earnings • Receivables measured at the lower of cost
or fair value
• Trade accounts receivable, other than credit card receivables, that both − Have a contractual maturity of one
year or less
− Arose from the sale of goods or services
• Loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality accounted for within a pool For each period the entity presents a
statement of income, qualitative and quantitative information about financing receivables modified as troubled debt restructurings within the previous 12 months for which there was a payment default during the period, including the types and amounts of financing receivables that defaulted
1 A statistic about the credit quality of financing receivables, such as an external credit rating (AAA or BBB), consumer credit risk scores, an internal credit risk grade (pass, substandard, or special mention), or the level of payment activity (performing or nonperforming)
Modifications
Disclosure by portfolio segment Applicability
Qualitative information about how troubled debt restructurings are factored into an entity’s determination of the allowance for credit losses
A creditor’s troubled debt restructurings of financing receivables, except for
• Receivables measured at fair value with changes in fair value reported in earnings • Receivables measured at the lower of cost
or fair value
• Trade accounts receivable, other than credit card receivables, that both − Have a contractual maturity of one
year or less
− Arose from the sale of goods or services
• Loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality accounted for within a pool For each period the entity presents a
statement of income, qualitative information about how payment defaults during the period on financing receivables modified as troubled debt restructurings within the previous 12 months are factored into an entity’s
determination of the allowance for credit losses
E. Effective date and transition
Public entities must apply the disclosure requirements applicable to period-end balances beginning with the first interim or annual reporting period ending on or after December 15, 2010 (December 31, 2010 for a calendar year-end public entity). Public entities’ disclosures about activity in the allowance for credit losses by portfolio segment during a reporting period are effective beginning with the first interim or annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2010 (January 1, 2011 for a calendar year-end public entity). Until these disclosure requirements are effective, entities must continue to provide the similar disclosures about activity required under ASC 310-10-50-12.
Nonpublic entities must apply all disclosure requirements in the ASU beginning with the first annual reporting period ending on or after December 15, 2011 (December 31, 2011 for a calendar year-end nonpublic entity).
Comparative disclosures are encouraged, but not required, for reporting periods ending before adoption of the amended disclosure requirements. Comparative disclosures are required for reporting periods ending after initial adoption.
© 2010 Grant Thornton LLP, U.S. member firm of Grant Thornton International Ltd. All rights reserved. This Grant Thornton LLP bulletin provides information and comments on current accounting issues and developments. It is not a comprehensive analysis of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide accounting or other advice or guidance with respect to the matters addressed in the bulletin. All relevant facts and circumstances, including the pertinent authoritative literature, need to be considered to arrive at conclusions that comply with matters addressed in this bulletin.