• No results found

The negotiation position amid member states of the EU

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "The negotiation position amid member states of the EU"

Copied!
5
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

Loading

Figure

Figure 1. Sociomap – contour (social position and status)
Figure 2. Sociomap – grid (the closest relationships)

References

Related documents

on the basis of this analysis, it is obvious that the trade liberalisation occurring at present is much more beneficial for the new member states (EU-12) than for the old EU

We fi nd that the three new EU member states with the largest economies and most developed fi nancial markets, the Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland, exhibit stronger

(EU) member states’ stock markets using the negative (positive) coexceedance variable that counts the number of large negative (large positive) returns on a given day across

Our main fi ndings are as follows: (1) Financial markets in the new EU Member States (plus Cyprus, Malta and Slovenia) are signi fi cantly less integrated than those in the

We argue that a harmonized VAT rate will generate substantial costs for EU member states to meet national budget requirements and that the revenue sharing mechanisms will

Excise taxes (together with value added tax) in the original fifteen Member States (EU‑15) and 12 candidate countries (later the new EU Member States, called the EU‑12) are

Though it is certainly unfair to depict smaller EU states as mere puppets of the larger Member States, the European Union does coordinate positions in advance in

In several of the EU-10+2 Member States ( Hungary, Poland, Romania, Slovak Republic) , constitutional changes and/or reforms, from Communist ruling to EU