• No results found

1 9 6 3

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "1 9 6 3"

Copied!
146
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

REPORT TO T H E CONGRESS F R O M T H E PRESIDENT O F THE UNITED STATES

UNITED STATES AERONAUTICS AND

SPACE ACTIVITIES

1 9 6 3

(2)

NOTE TO READERS: ALL PRINTED PAGES ARE INCLUDED,

UNNUMBERED BLANK PAGES DURING SCANNING AND QUALITY CONTROL CHECK HAVE BEEN DELETED

(3)

REPORT TO T H E CONGRESS FROM THE P R E S I D E N T O F THE UNITED STATES

UNITED STATES AERONAUTICS AND

SPACE ACTIVITIES 1 9 6 3

(4)

T H E W H i T E H O U S E

W A S H I N G T O N

J a n u a r y 27, 1964

TO THE CONGRESS O F THE UNITED STATES:

In accordance with Section 206 (b) of the National Aeronautics and Space Act of 1958, as amended, I t r a n s m i t herewith a r e p o r t f o r the calendar y e a r 1963, on this nation's aeronautics and space activities.

The y e a r 1963 was a p e r i o d of constructive development of our increasing s p a c e competence.

evaluation of the national space p r o g r a m -- a n evaluation which r e s u l t e d i n broad acceptance of the policy of our attaining and maintaining space l e a d e r ship, with due r e g a r d f o r our national

s e c u r i t y

.

It was a l s o a p e r i o d of searching

Our space p r o g r a m , i n both its civilian and m i l i t a r y a s p e c t s , is peaceful i n purpose and p r a c t i c e . M o r e o v e r , it combines such objective with a policy of international cooperation based upon a mutuality of participation and benefits as well as the wide dis-

semination of knowledge.

Space p r o g r e s s is e s s e n t i a l if this nation is to l e a d i n technology and i n the furthering of world peace. Such p r o g r e s s r e q u i r e s the u s e of substantial r e s o u r c e s , which m u s t be employed efficiently and effectively i n o r d e r that we obtain the maximum benefits with a minimum of waste.

In s u m m a r y f o r m , the accompanying r e p o r t depicts the contribu- tions of the various d e p a r t m e n t s and a g e n c i e s of the Government to the national space p r o g r a m during 1963.

(5)

T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S

Chapter I Chapter 11 Chapter 111 Chapter I V Chapter V Chapter V I Chapter VII Chapter VI11 Chapter IX Chapter X Chapter XI Chapter XI1 Chapter XI11 Appendix A-1 Appendix A-2 Appendix A-3 Appendix B Appendix C Appendix D Appendix E-1

Appendix E-2 Appendix E - 3 Index

U. S. Aeronautics and Space Activities --

1963 Summary ... 1

National Aeronautics and Space C o u n c i l . . 5

Administration ... 9

Department of D ef e ns e ... 39

Atomic Energy Commission ... 61

Department of State ... 67

National Science Foundation . . . 73

Department of C o m m e r c e ... 77

Space Science B o a r d . . ... 89

Smithsonian Astrophysical O b s e r v a t o r y . . 95 F e d e r a l Aviation Agency ... 101

F e d e r a l Communications Commission ... 109

United States Information Agency. . . . 115

National Aeronautics and Space U. S. Launching Record ( C h a r t ) ... 1 2 0 U. S. Launching Record (Table) ... 121

Successful U.S. Launches - 1963 ... 122

U . S . Space Launch V e h i c l e s . . ... 138

Selected P r o g r a m s f o r Cooperation i n Outer Space ( C h a r t ) . ... 140

SNAP Radioisotope E l e c t r i c P o w e r Units f o r Space ... 141

H i s t o r i c a l Summary and F Y 1965 Budget Recommendations (New Obligational H i s t o r i c a l Summary and F Y 1965 Budget Recommendations (Expenditures). ... 143

Space Activities Budget ... 144

... 145

Authority) ... 142

E X E C U T I V E O F F I C E OF T H E P R E S I D E N T

N A T I O N A L A E R O N A U T I C S AND SPACE COUNCIL

W A . * I * O T O *

(6)

Chapter I

U.S. Aeronautics and Space Activities 1963

S U M M A R Y

Nineteen s i x t y - t h r e e was a significant y e a r f o r the United States i n its arduous effort to achieve b r o a d s p a c e competence f o r peaceful purposes, i,ncluding both civilian and m i l i t a r y projects.

The p a s t s i x y e a r s have been productive ones i n overcoming competitive disadvan- tages, which derived directly f r o m a relatively l a t e s t a r t and f r o m initial lack of enthusiasm f o r s p a c e achievements. In this p r o c e s s , t h e r e have been numerous positive accomplishments, not the l e a s t of which has been the m a r s h a l l i n g of valued r e s o u r c e s into a viable national effort. L e a d e r s h i p among spacefaring nations is now a d i s c e r n i b l e goal. Our chief competitor h a s i n the m e a n t i m e not stood still, and i n f a c t continues to lead i n s o m e r e s p e c t s . Through their g r e a t e r ability to rocket heavier payloads into space, the U. S. S. R. could, f o r example, s c o r e new

" f i r s t s " i n maneuvering, rendezvousing, and s p a c e docking. However, o u r en- couraging p r o g r e s s i n the development of l a r g e r o c k e t s and i n sophisticated s p a c e - c r a f t gives s t r o n g indication that the United States will cut any "lag-time'' a p p r e - ciably as it proceeds toward new space s u c c e s s e s .

While many achievements a r e r e c o r d e d f o r the y e a r 1963, the r e c o r d f o r m s no b a s i s f o r complacency. If the goal of being f i r s t i n s p a c e is to be achieved and maintained, t h e r e can be no slackening of effort and no dampening of enthusiasm f o r s p a c e achievements.

The United States a d h e r e s f i r m l y to i t s policy of " s p a c e f o r peaceful purposes'' as e x p r e s s e d i n the b a s i c legislation and as espoused by this country's leadership.

F u r t h e r m o r e , as a c o r o l l a r y to that policy, we a r e cooperating with s o m e 60 nations i n various a s p e c t s of the s p a c e program. Such cooperation, i n intent and in proposals, extends to the Soviet Union on a mutually beneficial and peace-creating basis.

Although many specific accomplishments will be d e s c r i b e d i n m o r e detail throughout this r e p o r t , s p e c i a l notice should be given to the improved cooperation between agencies with s p a c e responsibilities, to the reorganization of NASA's management, and to the coordinated decision f o r the Defense Department to develop and u s e a manned orbiting laboratory.

The United States has made outstanding p r o g r e s s i n improving the reliability of its rockets. F o r example, during the y e a r , NASA had 14 launch s u c c e s s e s out of 15 attempts, including the s u c c e s s f u l launching of 10 e a r t h s a t e l l i t e s out of the 10 t r i e s made.

both i n the number of s u c c e s s e s and i n the reliability of i t s launch vehicles.

The launching r e c o r d of the Defense Department h a s a l s o been i m p r e s s i v e ,

The peaceful applications of s p a c e competence w e r e f u r t h e r e d , during the y e a r , i n the continuing improvements t o the weather, communications, and navigational s a t e l l i t e s y s t e m s .

In o r d e r to maintain this countryls lead i n the field of c o m m e r c i a l aviation,

(7)

decision was m a d e to proceed toward the development of a supersonic t r a n s p o r t f o r c o m m e r c i a l us e.

Of p a r t i c u l a r note during 1963 w e r e the following events and accomplishments.

. . . A U. S. a s t r o n a u t was orbited 22 t i m e s f o r a period of 34 hours, 20 minutes, and was a c c u r a t e l y landed within four m i l e s of a predicted point while under manual control. This MERCURY shot (MA-9) completed the f i r s t U. S. manned s p a c e flight p r o g r a m with a perfect r e c o r d .

. . . The s u c c e s s f u l launch of CENTAUR, the f i r s t known s u c c e s s f u l flight of a high energy r o c k e t fueled by liquid hyrdrogen was accomplished.

. . . The f i r s t synchronous s a t e l l i t e s , SYNCOM I & I1,were orbited. SYNCOM I1 was a l s o the f i r s t t r u l y maneuverable station-keeping satellite, the f i r s t space link f r o m North A m e r i c a t o Africa, the f i r s t 24-hour a day space communications link.

It was a l s o the f i r s t s a t e l l i t e to employ a s a t e l l i t e s h i p - t o - s h o r e link, and conducted the longest (7, 700 m i l e s f r o m California to Nigeria) s p a c e communication link.

. . . Twin s a t e l l i t e s capable of detecting nuclear explosions i n the atmosphere o r in outer s p a c e by radiation m e a s u r e m e n t s w e r e launched.

dual injection of the two s a t e l l i t e s into different 60, 000 m i l e o r b i t s .

The operation included

. . . A navigation s a t e l l i t e was stabilized i n a low (500 m i l e ) e a r t h orbit by passive means using only the e a r t h ' s gravity field and a damping mechanism.

. . . The X-15 r e s e a r c h r o c k e t - a i r c r a f t s e t new r e c o r d s i n flight on the fringes of space.

. . . The decision was made to r e v i s e and enlarge the Department of Defense s p a c e - flight p r o g r a m .

t o r y (MOL) p r o g r a m ; extension of the NASA-developed GEMINI s p a c e c r a f t to

defense m i s s i o n s ; cancellation of the X-20 p r o g r a m ; and expansion of P r o j e c t ASSET t o a c c e l e r a t e lifting body technology development.

Redirection included establishment of a Manned Orbiting Labora-

. . . The P r e s i d e n t o r d e r e d the development of a supersonic transport. F o r t y five tentative o r d e r s had been placed by the w o r l d ' s a i r l i n e s f o r the proposed a i r c r a f t . T h r e e a i r f r a m e and t h r e e engine companies a r e completing design proposals to be submitted this January.

. . . TELSTAR I1 joined RELAY i n o r b i t t o provide two operational low o r b i t com- munications s a t e l l i t e s , both furnishing television, phone, voice and teletype com- munication demonstrations.

. . . The f i r s t two s p a c e c r a f t powered entirely by nuclear units w e r e orbited this y e a r .

isotope t h e r m o - e l e c t r i c generator.

The power is supplied by the SNAP-9A 25-watt plutonium-fueled radio-

Two weather s a t e l l i t e s , TIROS VI1 and TIROS VI11 w e r e successfully launched, and weather s a t e l l i t e s launched to date have supplied over 300, 0 0 0 useful pictures.

TIROS VI11 contained a n automatic picture t r a n s m i s s i o n (APT) s y s t e m to provide daily weather p i c t u r e s to relatively inexpensive ground stations throught the world.

(8)

. . .

I n cooperation with other m e m b e r nations, the United States participated i n the drafting and acceptance of a United Nations resolution calling upon all nations t o r e - f r a i n f r o m stationing weapons of mass d e s t r u c t i o n i n outer space.

.

.

.An a g r e e m e n t t o ban nuclear testing i n outer s p a c e , the a t m o s p h e r e and under- w a t e r was drafted by the United States, the United Kingdom, and the Soviet Union, and ratified by o v e r 100 nations.

. . .

The United States played a leading p a r t in developing a Declaration of Legal P r i n c i p l e s to guide s t a t e s i n the exploration and u s e of outer space, which was unanimously adopted by the United Nations G e n e r a l Assembly.

.

. .

The United States e n t e r e d into a cooperative a g r e e m e n t with the Soviet Union en- visaging a n exchange of data f r o m coordinated launches of weather s a t e l l i t e s , joint experiments in s p a c e communications with passive United States s a t e l l i t e s , and a n exchange of data f r o m s a t e l l i t e s equipped with m a g n e t o m e t e r s .

.

. .

The E x t r a o r d i n a r y Administrative Radio Conference convened a t Geneva, Switzerland, in October 1963 t o allocate bands of frequencies f o r r e s e a r c h and d e - velopment i n the field of s p a c e communication and radio astronomy.

was concluded i n November with a good m e a s u r e of acceptance of the U. S. proposals.

. . .

New a s t r o n a u t s w e r e selected, and began training f o r the eventual l u n a r landing mis s ion.

An a g r e e m e n t

.

. .

Suborbital test flights w e r e conducted of the ASSET winged r e e n t r y vehicle and the L I T T L E JOE II APOLLO boilerplate v e r s i o n of the vehicle t o be u s e d f o r the manned lunar mission.

. .

. T h e scientific satellite EXPLORER XVII was placed into o r b i t and is furnishing significant information on a t m o s p h e r i c s t r u c t u r e s ,

. . .

LOFT1 2A conducted a dual frequency study of the propagation of v e r y low- frequency radio waves i n and through the ionosphere.

. . .

The 120-inch solid rocket to b e u s e d with the TITAN I11 was successfully tested.

.

.

. EXPLORE8 XVIII, the Interplanetary Monitoring P r o b e (IMP) afforded s c i e n t i s t s with the first comprehensive study of radiation h a z a r d s i n c i s l u n a r s p a c e t o a

distance of 150, 000 miles from the e a r t h .

. . .

A n a r r o w belt of tiny e l e c t r i c dipoles (WEST FORD) was established around the e a r t h , which had the communications ability and the decay c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s which had been planned.

. .

. The HITCHHIKER scientific s a t e l l i t e was launched into o r b i t f r o m another s a t e l - l i t e which had a l r e a d y been i n o r b i t s e v e r a l days.

. .

. T h e planets M a r s and Venus w e r e successfully contacted by r a d a r .

.

.

. Another in the s e r i e s of the l a r g e SATURN b o o s t e r s was successfully tested, to provide 1,500, 000 pounds of t h r u s t , the l a r g e s t first s t a g e yet tested.

. . .

T h e United States placed about 60 s a t e l l i t e payloads into orbit.

(9)

Chapter I1

National Aeronautics and Space Council

Nineteen Hundred and Sixty-Three w a s a y e a r of a c c e l e r a t e d effort and a c c e l e r a t e d learning a s the national space p r o g r a m of the United States reached higher levels of competence and performance. The y e a r ' s p r o g r a m included a 34-hour manned o r - bital flight, the launching of the world's first successful synchronous satellite, the world's first all-nuclear powered satellite, the f i r s t high energy hydrogen rocket stage, the first s a t e l l i t e stabilized by the e a r t h ' s gravity field, the orbiting of a belt of reflective communications dipoles, the orbiting of nuclear' t e s t detection space- c r a f t , and the achievement of c r i t i c a l milestones in the development of l a r g e - t h r u s t rocket engines.

During this y e a r , the United States w a s successful i n placing about 60 satellite pay- loads into e a r t h orbit, r a i s i n g the Nation's total f r o m the beginning of the space age to approximately 180. The Soviets put about one-third as many payloads into e a r t h o r b i t during 1963, although they w e r e sufficiently heavier than o u r s to keep t h e i r lead in total weight orbited. The o v e r - a l l country-to-country o r b i t a l payload r a t i o numerically is m o r e than 3 t o 1 in favor of the United States. In the light of avail- able information, it a l s o appeared that the r a t i o of s u c c e s s e s to f a i l u r e s was approx- imately comparable f o r both countries a s the launching vehicles of each showed a trend toward improved reliability.

By the end of 1963, the United States had under development m o r e powerful rockets than any the Soviet Union had i n operation.

U. S. S. R. in putting space competences t o d i r e c t u s e i n improving m a n ' s living on e a r t h by weather, communications, and navigation satellites. Although the U. S. S. R.

m u s t be credited with potential ability to do so, it h a s not developed comparable p r o - g r a m s for the benefit of mankind.

t h e i r lead in l a r g e operational rockets, near-rendezvous experiments, and the life s c i e n c e s a s p e c t s of space.

spent m o r e t i m e flying outside the atmosphere, and t h e i r interplanetary effort was significantly g r e a t e r .

they have a n orderly, step-by-step p r o g r a m which has i m p r e s s e d the world with t h e i r accomplishments.

This country remained well ahead of the

A t the s a m e time, however, the Soviets maintained They launched m o r e weight into space, t h e i r a s t r o n a u t s Their accumulation of data and experience made plain that

The National Aeronautics and Space Council h a s been guided by the p r e m i s e that the United States w i l l become the world's leading spacefaring nation and that it w i l l dedicate its space competence t o improving and maintaining the peace. To this end, our national s p a c e p r o g r a m has been designed t o i n c r e a s e our knowledge of the space environment and the fundamental f a c t s of nature; to m a s t e r the technology of manned and unmanned space flight; t o explore the s o l a r s y s t e m ; to i n c r e a s e our national

security; and t o utilize the r e s u l t s of space technology and discovery to achieve a broad range of economic and s o c i a l benefits. Our goals include i n c r e a s e d interna- tional cooperation i n the u s e of outer space for peaceful purposes, the development of the r e g i m e of l a w f o r outer space f o r peaceful purposes, the development of the r e g i m e of law f o r outer space, and t h e o r d e r l y and open conduct of space-related activities.

(10)

M o r e c r i t i c a l and detailed examination of the s p a c e p r o g r a m c h a r a c t e r i z e d the C o n g r e s s ' s approach t o budgetary r e q u e s t s f o r F Y 1964, p a r t i c u l a r l y regarding the funds f o r NASA. Although the n e t r e s u l t was l e s s than the amount of appropriations needed, it is significant and encouraging that the Congress favored a substantial i n c r e a s e over the preceding y e a r and hence supported a broad-based a c c e l e r a t e d program.

In discharging its responsibilities, the Council d i r e c t l y and through its staff engaged i n a wide r a n g e of policy and coordinating activities. Among such activities were:

a.

b.

C.

d.

e.

f.

g-

h.

i.

j.

k.

1.

formulated and recommended t o the P r e s i d e n t that the United States initiate a supersonic t r a n s p o r t prototype development p r o g r a m at the e a r l i e s t possible date, with t h e objective of obtaining a safe, econom- ically sound, and s u p e r i o r aircraft.

supervised the p r e p a r a t i o n and conducted the editing of the P r e s i d e n t ' s Annual Report t o the Congress on aeronautics and s p a c e activities for

1963.

testified on space and a e r o n a u t i c a l activities before committees of the Congress.

i n c r e a s e d the public understanding of the national s p a c e p r o g r a m through speeches, a r t i c l e s , public appearances, and interviews.

participated in the analysis and development of the F Y 1965 budgets f o r space.

coordinated efforts leading t o the launch of a n orbiting dipole belt and the r e l e a s e of information t o t h e world scientific community i n a c c o r d a n c e with the P r e s i d e n t ' s policy on P r o j e c t W E S T FORD.

participated i n continuing review of the m a j o r policy and planning i s s u e s confronting the Communications Satellite Corporation.

coordinated p r o c e d u r e s f o r the placing of n u c l e a r auxiliary power devices i n s p a c e c r a f t and m a d e positive recommendations t o the P r e s i d e n t regard.- i n g such launches.

initiated coordination on s p a c e p r o j e c t s , such a s s p a c e stations f o r m i l i t a r y and non-military missions.

participated in the development of United States positions with r e s p e c t t o b i l a t e r a l a r r a n g e m e n t s with the Soviet Union in the field of weather, com- munications, and geomagnetic satellites.

visited s p a c e installations, examined facilities, and discus s e d space developments and p r o b l e m s with mana g e r ial and t e chnica 1 s p e c i a l i s t s

.

engaged i n numerous interagency, as well as Government-industry, meetings and briefings on new developments in s p a c e technology and s p a c e benefits.

(11)

m.

n.

0.

participated in analyses leading to the decision to initiate a Manned Orbiting Laboratory (MOL) project.

developed i n t e r n a l analyses on nuclear rocket propulsion, nuclear auxiliary power, reliability of space launching vehicles, lunar and e a r t h o r b i t a l rendezvous, range instrumentation ships, post-lunar missions, high velocity space probes, and space station p r o g r a m decisions, and

maintained a c u r r e n t r e c o r d of United States and Soviet space

launches, developed comparisons between U. S. and U. S.S. R. space activities, and reviewed space accomplishments and potential of other nations

.

The Space Council held f o r m a l meetings on such subjects as: formulation of s u p e r - sonic t r a n s p o r t p r o g r a m recommendations; review of policy i s s u e s relating to the national space program; and coordination of Defense-NASA'space projects, such a s GEMINI and space stations.

The United States space p r o g r a m i s designed to maintain our position of leadership in the F r e e World.

and p r e s s i n g for ever-widening participation and distribution of space benefits, the United States has led the world effort It is i n the national i n t e r e s t --

economically, technologically, scientifically, militarily, and internationally -- to

c a r r y this p r o g r a m forward i n an a c c e l e r a t i n g fashion so that the United States w i l l obtain f o r mankind every one of i t s many benefits a s soon and as efficiently a s possible.

Cooperating with other nations i n many a r e a s of space technolbgy, this a r e a .

(12)

Chapter 111

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

INTRODUCTION

During 1963, 'the National Aeronautics and Space Administration made significant ad- vances i n all of its p r o g r a m s i n the continuing effort to a s s u r e preeminence in space f o r the United States.

The MERCURY manned s p a c e flight p r o j e c t culminated in the 22-orbit flight of Astronaut L. Gordon Cooper, Jr., May 15-16.

cluded the orbiting of SYNCOM and TELSTAR communications s a t e l l i t e s , the TIROS VII and VIII meteorological s a t e l l i t e , and t h e EXPLORER XVII, XVIII, and XIX geo- physical satellites.

CENTAUR rocket into orbit. The first s t a g e of the powerful SATURN I launch vehicle was successfully t e s t e d f o r the fourth time. P r o g r e s s a l s o continued i n all other as- pects of the drive to complete a manned lunar-landing-and-return m i s s i o n during this decade.

Other important achievements in-

And on November 27 NASA launched the hydrogen-fueled

MANNED SPACE FLIGHT

In 1963, NASA concluded P r o j e c t MERCURY and substantially advanced the work on P r o j e c t GEMINI and P r o j e c t APOLLO; the Agency a l s o took concurrent s t e p s to pro- vide the e s s e n t i a l manned space flight support.

P r o j e c t MERCURY

The outstanding event of the United States s p a c e p r o g r a m in 1963 was the s u c c e s s f u l flight of Astronaut L. Gordon Cooper, Jr. It began on the morning of May 15, 1963;

34 h o u r s and 20 minutes l a t e r , a f t e r completing 22 o r b i t s , Astronaut Cooper's space- c r a f t Faith 7 r e e n t e r e d the a t m o s p h e r e and splashed down i n the P a c i f i c Ocean. The p r i m a r y m i s s i o n of the flight w a s to evaluate the effects of weightlessness and ex- tended o r b i t a l flight on man.

The launch phase w a s n o r m a l ; the s p a c e c r a f t w a s i n s e r t e d into a n e a r - p e r f e c t orbit.

Its s y s t e m s p e r f o r m e d well until the 18th o r b i t , when the automatic control s y s t e m failed. F o r the r e s t of the flight, r e t r o f i r e , and r e e n t r y , Astronaut Cooper manually controlled the s p a c e c r a f t , landing it within four m i l e s of the predicted point.

astronaut p e r f o r m e d his t a s k s i n an outstanding manner and provided f u r t h e r evidence of the e s s e n t i a l r o l e of m a n i n s p a c e exploration.

The

The effectiveness of NASA's flight operations planning was u n d e r s c o r e d during this mission. Ground c o n t r o l l e r s quickly diagnosed the problem encountered in the auto- m a t i c control s y s t e m of the s p a c e c r a f t during the 19th o r b i t and subsequently r e l a y e d new instructions, enabling the a s t r o n a u t to make a manually controlled r e t r o f i r e and reentry.

operational techniques.

The s u c c e s s f u l t e r m i n a t i o n of t h i s flight confirmed the soundness of the

This flight a l s o enabled NASA t o conduct such scientific and engineering experiments

(13)

as medical studies, radiation m e a s u r e m e n t s , photographic and visibility studies, and experiments in TV communications.

In the a r e a of s p a c e medicine, the P r o j e c t MERCURY flights w e r e completed with no prolonged ill effects upon the a s t r o n a u t s ; also, t h e r e w e r e no significant deficiencies in the life support s y s t e m o r p e r s o n a l protective equipment developed f o r this project.

P a r t i c u l a r l y noteworthy is the f a c t that the MERCURY life-support system, originally designed f o r s h o r t duration m i s s i o n s , was modified during the c o u r s e of the project to support man f o r m o r e than 34 hours. Improvements in equipment and techniques w e r e c h a r a c t e r i s t i c of e a c h succeeding flight.

In P r o j e c t MERCURY, the United States learned:

a.

b.

C.

d.

e.

f.

how t o design, build, and t e s t the n e c e s s a r y spacecraft.

how to adapt launch vehicles, never intended f o r manned flight, so that they a r e sufficiently safe and r e l i a b l e f o r manned flight.

how t o o p e r a t e a worldwide network of radio and r a d a r t o keep t r a c k of the s p a c e c r a f t and r e m a i n i n communication with the pilot.

how t o r e c o v e r s p a c e c r a f t f r o m the ocean in a v e r y s h o r t period of time.

how t o s e l e c t and t r a i n a s t r o n a u t s .

how t o develop and o p e r a t e life-support s y s t e m s , p r e s s u r e suits, and biomedical instrumentation s y s t e m s .

P e r h a p s m o s t important of all, the United States has l e a r n e d that m a n c a n contribute m a t e r i a l l y t o the exploration of space. He c a n make scientific observations i n space and p e r f o r m and a s s e s s scientific experiments. A s a n engineer and t e s t pilot, he can function as a p r i m a r y s y s t e m of the s p a c e c r a f t , and he c a n cope with the unexpected in a s p a c e mission. T h e s e demonstrations of m a n ' s ability t o judge, t o reason, and t o cope with the unexpected enable the United States to proceed with confidence that m a n can a s s u m e the r o l e of e x p l o r e r in s p a c e j u s t as he has been a n e x p l o r e r on earth.

The objectives of P r o j e c t MERCURY, as laid out i n 1958, w e r e t o take the first s t e p in the manned exploration of space, to d e t e r m i n e m a n ' s capabilities i n space, and to develop the foundation f o r the technology of manned s p a c e flight.

completion of the Cooper m i s s i o n , t h e s e objectives have been m o r e than met.

With successful

P r o i e c t GEMINI

P r o j e c t GEMINI is the second m a j o r s t e p being taken by the United States in manned s p a c e s y s t e m s development and manned s p a c e exploration.

MERCURY, GEMINI will provide a two-man s p a c e c r a f t ; the objectives of the project a r e t o i n c r e a s e operational proficiency and to gain m o r e knowledge of the technology of manned s p a c e flight. Specific a r e a s within t h e s e objectives include long duration flight, rendezvous and docking, post docking m a n e u v e r s , controlled r e e n t r y , e x t r a - vehicular activity, and ground and flight c r e w training.

Closely following

(14)

Production design of the GEMINI s p a c e c r a f t s t r u c t u r e was completed i n F e b r u a r y ; i n October, GEMINI Spacecraft No. 1 was delivered to Cape Canaveral (now Cape Kennedy). Spacecraft No. 1 together with the f i r s t GEMINI Launch Vehicle, a l s o d e - livered in October, will be used in the f i r s t unmanned developmental flight scheduled during the first half of 1964.

To t e s t the final design of the s p a c e c r a f t and various s u b s y s t e m s , 10 non-flight space- c r a f t w e r e i n the p r o c e s s of being fabricated. These will be used to evaluate the various individual subsystems of the spacecraft such as the life support s y s t e m , the ejection s e a t s , and the parachute recovery s y s t e m ; they will a l s o be used to t e s t s t r u c t u r a l design and astronaut training.

Typical s t r u c t u r a l t e s t s include p r e s s u r i z a t i o n , flotation, and landing impact. Seven successful parachute d r o p s w e r e conducted during the s u m m e r months to qualify the r e c o v e r y system. Two of t h e s e w e r e dropped i n the w a t e r to d e t e r m i n e impact loads.

Effort was devoted to the development of the p a r a g l i d e r r e c o v e r y s y s t e m f o r a s e r i e s of air drops.

d e t e r m i n e landing c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s .

More than 100 ground tow t e s t s w e r e m a d e with a half-scale model to

Electronic s y s t e m s t e s t s w e r e conducted to d e t e r m i n e the intercompatibility of the s p a c e c r a f t electronics and guidance s y s t e m s .

which make up the flyable s p a c e c r a f t f o r m i s s i o n No. 2 was underway by the end of the y e a r .

A complete t e s t of all the subsystems

The GEMINI Launch Vehicle (GLV) is a modified TITAN 11 being procured by NASA

through the A i r F o r c e Space Systems Division.

to be procured.

checkout of all s u b s y s t e m s , qualification testing of components, and c o r r e c t i o n of c e r t a i n deficiencies noted by t h e vehicle acceptance t e a m .

A total of 15 s u c h launch vehicles a r e The first of t h e s e was delivered to Cape Kennedy i n October following

C r i t i c a l components of the GLV, s u c h as the malfunction detection s y s t e m , w e r e flight t e s t e d on A i r F o r c e TITAN 11 ICBM's to gain flight reliability data.

the planned six such t e s t s w e r e flown before the end of t h e y e a r .

first GEMINI flight, flight data f r o m many standard A i r F o r c e TITAN I P S w e r e being obtained.

T h r e e of Also, p r i o r to the

The t a r g e t vehicle f o r t h e GEMINI rendezvous and docking m i s s i o n s c o n s i s t s of the ATLAS standard launch vehicle and a modified AGENA D.

fied to give it maneuverability i n o r b i t and to provide f o r actual docking with the spacecraft.

The AGENA is being modi-

During the y e a r , work on the t a r g e t vehicle c e n t e r e d on development and t e s t of the AGENA propulsion s y s t e m .

altitude conditions; the r e s u l t s w e r e satisfactory. Design and development of other a s p e c t s of the AGENA a r e proceeding according to schedule, with the f i r s t delivery planned f o r e a r l y 1965.

The s y s t e m was repeatedly f i r e d under simulated orbital

Operational concepts and p r o c e d u r e s w e r e being developed f o r P r o j e c t s GEMINI and APOLLO, using the experience gained f r o m P r o j e c t MERCURY. A new ground con- t r o l s i t e , the Integrated Mission Control Center (IMCC), was under development a t the Manned Spacecraft Center i p Houston. This Center will maintain operational

(15)

control o v e r the manned flights now planned f o r both GEMINI and APOLLO.

ground c r e w s underwent intensified training f o r the e a r l y GEMINI flights.

The

P r o j e c t APOLLO

NASA continued p r o g r e s s with the development of the P r o j e c t APOLLO s p a c e c r a f t , t h e launch vehicles and propulsion s y s t e m s , and t h e associated m i s s i o n planning.

Systems Engineering 0 - During 1963, continued p r o g r e s s was m a d e in the overall en- gineering of the s y s t e m f o r manned lunar flight. Additional detailed specifications of the hardware w e r e completed. The computation of the detailed flight path was begun.

Special attention was paid to natural environmental problems, including the e a r t h ' s radiation belts, s o l a r f l a r e s , meteoroids, and the s u r f a c e of the moon. The value of a lunar o r b i t e r was established, and m i s s i o n assignments f o r the APOLLO flight t e s t s w e r e established.

Spacecraft -- During the p a s t y e a r , NASA completed selection of the APOLLO space- c r a f t industrial team, the first t e s t s p a c e c r a f t w e r e delivered, and the f i r s t develop- mental flights w e r e made.

T h r e e boilerplate APOLLO Spacecraft Command and S e r v i c e Modules w e r e con- s t r u c t e d and delivered by October 1963.

Year 1963, with six of the boilerplates f o r unmanned flight testing and t h r e e f o r various ground tests.

A total of nine w e r e delivered i n Calendar

(A boilerplate s p a c e c r a f t has the s a m e shape, but is heavier s t r u c t u r a l l y than the s p a c e c r a f t that will make the mission.

ticated i t e m s of equipment, containing elaborate instrumentation and actual space- c r a f t s y s t e m s and components. )

Some boilerplate s p a c e c r a f t a r e highly sophis-

T h r e e of the flight t e s t s of t h e s e boilerplates a r e t o d e m o n s t r a t e the m i s s i o n a b o r t emergency escape systems.

m i c r o m e t e o r i t e density i n n e a r e a r t h space, and one is to obtain information on con- ditions of vibration, t e m p e r a t u r e , p r e s s u r e , and noise at launch.

Of the other t h r e e flight t e s t s , two a r e to m e a s u r e the

Manufacturing was a l s o begun on t h r e e prototype s p a c e c r a f t ( s i m i l a r to those planned f o r the l u n a r mission). Two of t h e s e s p a c e c r a f t a r e to be used f o r ground t e s t s to check out the s p a c e c r a f t s t r u c t u r e and s y s t e m s under simulated m i s s i o n and space conditions.

the s p a c e c r a f t s y s t e m s , including the heat shield.

The third is to be a production a i r - f r a m e f o r unmanned flight testing of

Nearly half the ground t e s t s of boilerplate s p a c e c r a f t w e r e completed. Basic design approaches w e r e confirmed i n w a t e r r e c o v e r y and handling operations, land and w a t e r impact t e s t s , parachute r e c o v e r y t e s t s , and dynamics t e s t s conducted in com- bination with a prototype SATURN launch vehicle.

At the White Sands M i s s i l e Range (WSMR), N. Mex., a LITTLE J O E I1 launch vehicle facility was completed and made operational i n July. In August, a LITTLE J O E 11 launch vehicle with a dummy s p a c e c r a f t payload was flight tested a t White Sands to qualify the launch vehicle for forthcoming APOLLO s p a c e c r a f t emergency escape s y s t e m t e s t s . I n a flight at W S M R i n November, the launch e s c a p e s y s t e m of the APOLLO was tested i n a launch pad a b o r t situation.

lated a m i s s i o n a b o r t resulting f r o m a launch vehicle f a i l u r e on the pad.

This flight successfully simu-

(16)

In January, NASA signed a contract f o r the Lunar Excursion Module (LEM).

Lunar Excursion Module is used t o t r a n s p o r t two a s t r o n a u t s f r o m the mother space- c r a f t i n lunar o r b i t to the lunar s u r f a c e and back again to the mother spacecraft.

During 1963, m o r e than a dozen subcontracts w e r e l e t to f o r m the Lunar Excursion Module industry team.

The

A p r e l i m i n a r y configuration of the LEM was "frozen" in the middle of the y e a r , and the first of a s e r i e s of mockups was reviewed in September. P l a n s w e r e drawn and construction s t a r t e d to p e r m i t the f i r s t t e s t f i r i n g of the LEM rocket engines at White Sands, N. Mex., in mid-1964. The descent engine of the LEM will r e p r e s e n t a tech- nological advance in that it m u s t be capable of a t h r u s t level variation ranging f r o m one-tenth to maximum thrust.

t h e s e will provide the b a s i s f o r selecting the final descent engine design.

Two p a r a l l e l development efforts w e r e underway;

Small bi-propellant control engines which a r e capable of thousands of starts w e r e i n the advanced s t a g e s of development f o r the reaction control s y s t e m s of the APOLLO Spacecraft Command and S e r v i c e Modules.

the attitude of the s p a c e c r a f t i n s p a c e and during r e e n t r y .

These engines a r e used f o r controlling

The 22,000-pound t h r u s t s e r v i c e module propulsion s y s t e m engine, a l s o with mul- tiple start capability, underwent altitude testing at the Arnold Engineering Develop- m e n t Center (AEDC) f a c i l i t i e s at Tullahoma, Tenn.

attaining t h e highly r e l i a b l e s p a c e c r a f t engine n e c e s s a r y to a s s u r e flight safety and m i s s i o n s u c c e s s .

e a r t h once the s p a c e c r a f t l e a v e s the n e a r - e a r t h environment.

This p r o g r a m is d i r e c t e d toward This engine is the p r i m e means of returning the a s t r o n a u t s to

Construction was initiated on the APOLLO Propulsion Development T e s t F a c i l i t i e s at White Sands M i s s i l e Range, N. Mex. Also included at this s i t e a r e the Control Center, the Propellant Storage and T r a n s f e r System, a P r e p a r a t i o n Building and the P r o j e c t Control A r e a .

At the Manned Spacecraft Center i n Houston, Tex., c o n t r a c t s w e r e awarded f o r con- s t r u c t i o n of two m a j o r t e s t facilities.

Testing Laboratory; the other is the Flight Acceleration Facility.

l a b o r a t o r y and administrative f a c i l i t i e s w e r e n e a r completion.

One of the buildings is the Environmental Thirteen other

Launch Vehicles and Propulsion -- The development of m o r e powerful engines and launch vehicles r e q u i r e d f o r the APOLLO p r o j e c t p r o g r e s s e d significantly in 1963.

T h e SATURN I, the SATURN I-B, and the &TURN V a r e the launch vehicles under development.

The configuration of the SATURN I c o n s i s t s of two stages: (1) the S-I booster stage, powered by eight H-1 engines (liquid oxygen and k e r o s e n e ) developing 1 . 5 million pounds of t h r u s t ; and (2) the S-IV second stage, propelled by s i x RL-10 A-3 engines (liquid oxygen-liquid hydrogen), generating 90,000 pounds of t h r u s t . The SATURN I is slated f o r u s e in e a r t h o r b i t a l t e s t s of two of the t h r e e modules of the APOLLO spacecraft.

The fourth unmanned developmental flight of the SATURN I w a s successfully com- pleted in March.

flights, consisting of a live first s t a g e and dummy upper stages.

The flight configuration was similar t o the first t h r e e successful

Uprating of the H-1 engine f r o m 165,000 to 188,000 pounds of t h r u s t was nearing

(17)

successful completion and f u r t h e r uprating of the engine to 2 0 0 , 0 0 0 pounds of t h r u s t f o r SATURN I-B flights was approved.

veloped: (1) a s t a i n l e s s s t e l l t h r u s t chamber of i n c r e a s e d durability and ( 2 ) a new i n - j e c t o r capable of damping out a r t i f i c i a l l y induced combustion instability.

Two improvements to the engine w e r e de-

The first S-IV flight s t a g e was s u c c e s s f u l l y s t a t i c f i r e d f o r its full m i s s i o n duration i n August and was delivered to Cape Kennedy f o r f i n a l pre-flight checkout in Septem- ber.

In November, fabrication of hardware began on the SATURN I-B, a n improved v e r s i o n of the SATURN 1.

vous operations of the complete APOLLO s p a c e c r a f t , including the Command Module, the S e r v i c e Module, and the Lunar Excursion Module. This launch vehicle will com- p r i s e a first s t a g e (S-IB) which will be a modified v e r s i o n of the SATURN I f i r s t s t a g e , and a second s t a g e (S-IVB) propelled by one J - 2 engine generating 200,000 pounds of t h r u s t .

of the SATURN V vehicle.

1965.

The I-B will be used f o r manned e a r t h orbital flights and rendez-

The S-IVB second s t a g e is essentially the s a m e as the t h i r d stage Flight testing of the SATURN I-B vehicle is scheduled f o r

The J - 2 engine, which a l s o powers the S-I1 second s t a g e of SATURN V, underwent s u c c e s s f u l t e s t s and the first production engine f o r u s e i n ground testing of s t a g e s was delivered.

The SATURN V, the m o s t powerful launch vehicle now under development, will p r o - vide the launch power r e q u i r e d t o land two m e n on the moon. The vehicle will stand 281 f e e t high (without payload) and will weigh approximately s i x million pounds.

will have the capability t o place 240,000 pounds (the equivalent of 80 MERCURY cap- s u l e s ) into e a r t h o r b i t , and 90,000 pounds into a t r a n s l u n a r t r a j e c t o r y .

It

The vehicle has t h r e e stages. The first o r booster s t a g e (S-1C) will have five F - 1 engines (liquid oxygen and k e r o s e n e ) producing a total of 7.5 million pounds of thrust.

Work was begun on the f a b r i c a t i o n and a s s e m b l y of the first ground t e s t stage--the A l l Systems stage--at the M a r s h a l l Space Flight Center. In addition, a full s c a l e

mock-up of the t h r u s t s t r u c t u r e a s s e m b l y , m e a s u r i n g approximately 20 f e e t in height, and 33 f e e t i n d i a m e t e r , was built t h e r e .

In the F-1 p r o g r a m , substantial p r o g r e s s was made i n developing an injector which will produce stable combustion.

nozzle extension, improved turbopumps, vehicle interconnects, and a heat exchanger f o r heating vehicle tank p r e s s u r i z i n g gases.

a l s o demonstrated.

l a r g e l y the r e s u l t of the work of a NASA-Industry-University r e s e a r c h t a s k f o r c e which was formed f o r the purpose.

Continued p r o g r e s s was made in developing the Gimballing capability of the engine was The p r o g r e s s i n solving the combustion instability problem was

At the c l o s e of the y e a r , t h r e e new F - 1 production t e s t stands a t Edwards Air F o r c e B a s e w e r e nearing completion and the first production engine f o r ground testing by the M a r s h a l l Space Flight Center and vehicle m a n u f a c t u r e r s was completed.

The second o r S-11 stage is equipped with f i v e J - 2 engines (liquid oxygen-liquid hydro- gen); t h e s e will yield a total of one million pounds of t h r u s t .

powerful stage under development using liquid oxygen and liquid hydrogen as propel- lants. The t o t a l thrust of this s t a g e is 11 t i m e s g r e a t e r than that of the S-IV, which is the second s t a g e of the SATURN I.

The S-I1 is the m o s t

(18)

The s-II i s being a s s e m b l e d at S e a l Beach, Calif.

t u r e d at Downey, Calif., and Tulsa, Okla. F a b r i c a t i o n of h a r d w a r e f o r the battleship and the s t r u c t u r a l t e s t s t a g e s was initiated during 1963.

Components a r e being manufac-

The t h i r d s t a g e of the SATURN V vehicle is a n S-IVB s t a g e powered by a single 200,000 pound t h r u s t 5-2 engine.

e a r t h o r b i t and, a f t e r a p r e d e t e r m i n e d c o a s t period, it will be re-ignited t o provide the propulsion t o place the s p a c e c r a f t on i t s l u n a r journey.

p r o g r e s s with the S-IVB stage over the p a s t y e a r .

the final phase of completion; the ground t e s t s t a g e s , f o r e r u n n e r s of t h e flight stage, w e r e being fabricated; and the t e s t f a c i l i t i e s w e r e p r o g r e s s i n g on schedule.

This s t a g e will c a r r y the APOLLO s p a c e c r a f t t o NASA m a d e significant The initial design effort was i n

The I n s t r u m e n t Unit i s the u p p e r m o s t p a r t of the SATURN V vehicle.

c y l i n d r i c a l section 260 inches in d i a m e t e r .

and n e r v e c e n t e r f o r the vehicle and d e t e r m i n e s the optimum t r a j e c t o r y t o achieve the d e s i r e d flight m i s s i o n r e q u i r e m e n t s through i t s guidance and control s y s t e m s sup- ported by its m e a s u r i n g , telemetering, and r a d i o frequency s y s t e m s .

It is a 3-foot The Instrument Unit s e r v e s as the b r a i n

In the p a s t y e a r , m o s t of t h e prelirninary design was completed f o r the components of the I n s t r u m e n t Unit, and t h e c o n t r a c t o r was selected f o r the a s s e m b l y and checkout of the Instrument Unit.

f o r m and f o r the guidance computer and a s s o c i a t e d d a t a adapter.

Also c o n t r a c t s w e r e awarded f o r the stabilized guidance plat-

In 1963, a p r o g r a m was instituted to a s s u r e the compatibility of m i s s i o n r e q u i r e - m e n t s and vehicle capabilities, using p e r f o r m a n c e and weight as a n index.

tion, high-speed computational capabilities w e r e developed f o r studies t o investigate vehicle s y s t e m s and designs which c r i t i c a l l y affect the weight-performance relation- ships.

In addi-

Basic design concepts of the computer-controlled checkout s y s t e m s f o r the APOLLO s p a c e c r a f t and SATURN launch vehicles w e r e approved, and stringent reliability and quality r e q u i r e m e n t s w e r e established.

NASA continued constructing the f a c i l i t i e s n e c e s s a r y f o r t h e f a b r i c a t i o n and testing of m o r e powerful launch vehicles. The M a r s h a l l Space Flight C e n t e r ' s S-I s t a t i c t e s t stand was completed, and construction undertaken of SATURN V s t a t i c t e s t f a c i l i t i e s f o r the engines and vehicles. The Michoud P l a n t at New Orleans, La. , which p r o - vides 1.8 million s q u a r e f e e t of s p a c e f o r the manufacture and a s s e m b l y of the SATURN I and SATURN V vehicles, a s s u m e d operational capability.

The construction of a l a r g e v e r t i c a l a s s e m b l y and hydrostatic test s t r u c t u r e f o r the SATURN V f i r s t s t a g e was c a r r i e d through t o completion, and e r e c t i o n of a new en- gineering building was initiated.

A t the M i s s i s s i p p i T e s t Facility, s i t e f o r ground testing of l a r g e launch vehicle s t a g e s , the acquisition of 13, 000 a c r e s f o r the construction a r e a was completed, and e a s e m e n t s on about 128,000 a c r e s of land ( n e c e s s a r y buffer zone) w e r e approximately 40 p e r c e n t complete.

construction c o n t r a c t s w e r e awarded f o r support s t r u c t u r e s , t e s t s t a n d s , waterways and utilities. Approximately $70 million of construction c o n t r a c t s had been awarded by the end of the y e a r .

F a c i l i t i e s valued a t $150 million w e r e placed under design;

Other facilities f o r manufacutre, a s s e m b l y , and t e s t of the SATURN engine and the

References

Related documents

factors of firm and corporate governance characteristics associated with audit quality or bank-.. appointed auditors using of propensity-score matching

We would like to share our 2014 Plateau Pediatrics Patient Satisfaction Survey results with you1.

Jack out the rotor assembly with the thrust bearing until the indicator on the clearance setting bracket is at the required pressure tip clearance.. Move the assembly 0.001" at

Looking at the developments in 2013, the mobile revenue generated per device remained constant, but shows an interesting turn in early 2014: While all devices are increasing

Please select an occupational family, group, and sub-group for your first job after graduation from Auburn University.. Architecture and Engineering Occupations

Hierarchical multiple regression analyses were conducted with each of the remaining predictors (child abuse, parental neglect for each parent, and parental warmth for each parent) in

After prolonged debate, Senate confirmed nominations of the 14 incorporators of Communications Satellite Corp. Bisplinghoff, Director of NASA Office of Advanced

We compared hypothalamic volumes in PD patients with matched controls and determined whether volume loss corre- lated with reduced melatonin output in the PD group.. Methods: A total