• No results found

Analysis of statistics 2015

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Analysis of statistics 2015"

Copied!
60
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Analysis of statistics 2015

(2)

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2015

Table of Contents

Overview of the Court’s statistics in 2015 ... 4

A. Number of new applications ... 4

B. Applications disposed of judicially and pending applications ... 4

C. Processing of applications ... 4

1. Pre-allocation ... 4

2. Inadmissibility or strike out decisions ... 4

3. Communicated applications ... 5

4. Judgments ... 5

5. Requests for interim measures (Rule 39 of the Rules of Court) ... 5

D. Priority policy ... 5

General information ... 6

Number of applications allocated to a judicial formation ... 7

Processing of applications ... 9

Country-specific information ... 14

Albania ... 14

Andorra ... 15

Armenia ... 16

Austria ... 17

Azerbaijan ... 18

Belgium ... 19

Bosnia and Herzegovina... 20

Bulgaria ... 21

Croatia ... 22

Cyprus ... 23

Czech Republic ... 24

Denmark ... 25

Estonia ... 26

Finland ... 27

France ... 28

Georgia ... 29

Germany ... 30

Greece ... 31

Hungary ... 32

Iceland ... 33

Ireland ... 34

Italy ... 35

Latvia ... 36

Liechtenstein ... 37

Lithuania ... 38

(3)

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2015

Republic of Moldova ... 41

Monaco ... 42

Montenegro ... 43

Netherlands ... 44

Norway ... 45

Poland ... 46

Portugal ... 47

Romania ... 48

Russian Federation ... 49

San Marino ... 50

Serbia ... 51

Slovakia ... 52

Slovenia ... 53

Spain ... 54

Sweden ... 55

Switzerland ... 56

“The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia” ... 57

Turkey ... 58

Ukraine ... 59

United Kingdom ... 60

(4)

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2015

Overview of the Court’s statistics in 2015

The Court’s statistics for 2015 disclose like last year a lower number of incoming cases allocated to a judicial formation. This is partly the result of a new approach to Rule 47 of the Rules of Court, which determines what applicants are required to do for their application to be allocated for judicial decision. However, there is also an indication of a falling off in demand with a lower number of cases coming into the system and in particular a lower number of applications allocated to the Single Judge. This has helped the Court to reduce the stock of pending cases since the number of applications disposed of exceeds the volume of incoming cases.

The backlog of inadmissible cases has been eliminated which explains the decrease in the number of applications decided by the Single judge. As the Court focuses on other categories of cases, productivity will tend to remain more stable, with fluctuations depending on when large groups of cases are processed and adjudicated. This change of focus is reflected in the increase in the number of applications in those other categories (I to V) which were communicated or decided by judgment or decision. 9,999 more such applications were processed in 2015 than in 2014.

A. Number of new applications

In 2015 40,650 applications were allocated to a judicial formation, an overall decrease of 28%

compared with 2014 (56,200). 27,050 of these were identified as Single-Judge cases likely to be declared inadmissible (a decrease of 40% in relation to 2014). 13,600 were identified as probable Chamber or Committee cases (a decrease of 19%). It is the second year in a row that the number of allocated cases has decreased (- 15% in 2014).

B. Applications disposed of judicially and pending applications

45,576 applications were disposed of judicially, a decrease of 47% in relation to 2014 (86,068). The number of cases disposed of exceeded those allocated by more than 4,900 (i.e. a monthly surplus of around 400). As a result, the stock of allocated applications pending before the Court decreased over the year, by 7% from 69,900 to 64,850.

C. Processing of applications

1. Pre-allocation

As at 31 December 2015 the number of applications pending at this pre-judicial stage stood at 10,000, a decrease of 48% in relation to the same date the previous year (19,050). The number of applications disposed of administratively in 2015 was 32,400, an increase of 29%. 45% of these files were disposed of under Rule 47.

2. Inadmissibility or strike out decisions

In 2015 43,135 applications were declared inadmissible or struck out of the list of cases by a Single Judge, a Committee or a Chamber, a 48% decrease compared with 2014 (83,680).

The Single-Judge formation decided 36,314 cases in 2015, a decrease of 54% compared with 2014 (78,664).

The number of applications struck out by a Chamber or a Committee, in a decision or a judgment, following a friendly settlement or a unilateral declaration, increased by 111% in 2015 (4,628 compared to 2,198 in 2014). Friendly settlements (1,658) decreased by 2% (1,696 in 2014) and unilateral declarations were multiplied by almost six (2,970 compared to 502 in 2014).

(5)

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2015

3. Communicated applications

Where an application is not on its face inadmissible, it is communicated to the respondent Government. In 2015 15,965 applications were communicated (an increase of 102% compared to 2014 when 7,895 applications were communicated).

4. Judgments

Judgments were delivered in respect of 2,441 applications (compared with 2,388 in 2014 – an increase of 2%). A significant proportion of these applications were joined with the result that the number of judgments actually delivered was 823, a decrease of 8%. 177 judgments (in respect of 1,589 applications) were adopted by a three-judge Committee formation. These judgments accounted for 65% of the applications decided by a judgment (59% in 2014).

5. Requests for interim measures (Rule 39 of the Rules of Court)

The total number of decisions on interim measures (1,458) decreased by 25% compared with 2014 (1,939). The Court granted requests for interim measures in 161 cases (a decrease of 25% compared with 216 in 2014) and dismissed them in 630 cases (19% less than the 782 in 2014). The remainder fell outside the scope of Rule 39 of the Rules of Court. 39% of the requests granted are linked to the conflict in Ukraine.

D. Priority policy

1

The essence of this policy is to concentrate more resources on the most important cases, namely the cases falling within the top three categories (“priority applications”). At 31 December 2015 there were 11,490 applications in these categories.

The number of priority applications dealt with at different stages of the procedure in 2015 increased by 10% compared to 2014. 37% more priority applications were communicated to the respondent Governments in comparison with 2014. The number of priority applications declared inadmissible or struck out of the list of cases by a Chamber or Committee decreased by 35%. The number of priority applications struck out following a friendly settlement or a unilateral declaration decreased from 326 in 2014 to 302 in 2015. The number of priority applications giving rise to a judgment increased by 11% in 2015.

(6)

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2015

General information

Table 1 General statistical information

40650 56200 -28%

2015 2014 +/-

15965 7895 102%

2015 2014 +/-

45576 86068 -47%

2441 2388 2%

43135 83680 -48%

31/12/2015 1/1/2015 +/-

64850 69900 -7%

27200 29650 -8%

34500 32050 8%

3150 8200 -62%

31/12/2015 1/1/2015 +/-

10000 19050 -48%

2015 2014 +/-

32400 25100 29%

- by judgment delivered

1. Applications allocated to a judicial formation

2015 2014 +/-

[round figures (50)]

Applications allocated

2. Interim procedural events

Applications communicated to respondent Government

3. Applications decided By decision or judgment

5. Pre-judicial applications[round figures (50)]

Applications at a pre-judicial stage

Applications disposed of administratively - by decision (inadmissible or struck out)

4. Pending applications[round figures (50)]

Applications pending before a judicial formation

- Chamber and Grand Chamber - Committee

- Single-Judge formation

(7)

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2015

Number of applications allocated to a judicial formation

2

Chart 1 Applications allocated to a judicial formation per year

Chart 2 Applications pending before a judicial formation

0 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000 70000

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 1050013800

28200 27200 32500

35300 39200

41500 49600

57000 61100

64200 64900 65800

56200

40600

1590019800 29400

38500 50000

56800 66500

79400 97300

119300 139650

151600

128100

99900

69900

64850

0 20000 40000 60000 80000 100000 120000 140000 160000

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

(8)

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2015

Chart 3 High case-count States (more than 1,500 applications pending before a judicial formation)

Chart 4 The Court’s total caseload by stage of proceedings and judicial formation

3

Ukraine 13850 21,4%

Russia 9200 14,2%

Turkey 8450 13,0%

Italy 7550 11,6%

Hungary 4600 7,1%

Romania 3550 5,5%

Georgia 2150 3,3%

Poland 1700 2,6%

Slovenia 1650 2,5%

Azerbaijan 1500 2,3%

remaining 37 States 10650 16,4%

Total number of pending applications: 64,850

Single Judge or Committee (cat. VI - VII)

3147 4,9%

Chamber or Committee - awaiting first examination

(cat. I - V) 36107 55,7%

Communicated 22013 34,0%

Pending Government action

3013 4,6%

Admissible 554 0,9%

Total applications 64,850

(9)

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2015

Chart 5 The Court’s total caseload by priority category

Processing of applications

Chart 6 Major procedural steps in processing of applications

Cat. I 827 1,3%

Cat. II 318 0,5%

Cat. III 10345 16,0%

Cat. IV 19604 30,2%

Cat. V 30508 47,1%

Cat. VI-VII 3232 5,0%

Total applications 64,850

0 20000 40000 60000 80000 100000 120000

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Applications

judgment delivered 757 934 889 736 816 1208 1719 1734 1880 2393 2607 1511 1678 3661 2388 2441 Applications

communicated 1463 1573 1686 1717 2447 2956 3232 3456 4416 6203 6674 5360 5236 7931 7895 15965

(10)

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2015

Chart 7 Number of judgments since 2000

Chart 8 Applications in categories I, II and III processed from 2012 to 2015

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 695

888 844

703 718 1105

15601503 1543 1625 1499

1157 1093

916 891 823

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500

2012 2013 2014 2015

1563

1303

1742

2392

921

771

1051

680

546 517 623 691

communicated decision judgment

(11)

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2015

Table 2 Applications allocated per Contracting State and population

State

2012 2013 2014 2015 1.1.2012 1.1.2013 1.1.2014 1.1.2015 2012 2013 2014 2015

Albania 111 106 82 147 3195 2899 2896 2893 0,35 0,37 0,28 0,51

Andorra 6 2 5 6 85 76 76 76 0,71 0,26 0,66 0,79

Armenia 238 196 156 122 3274 3027 3017 3017 0,73 0,65 0,52 0,40

Austria 377 437 315 263 8443 8452 8507 8585 0,45 0,52 0,37 0,31

Azerbaijan 342 324 402 268 9235 9356 9477 9593 0,37 0,35 0,42 0,28

Belgium 268 270 159 202 11041 11162 11204 11258 0,24 0,24 0,14 0,18

Bosnia and

Herzegovina 430 870 667 908 3829 3829 3831 3825 1,12 2,27 1,74 2,37

Bulgaria 1274 1209 928 1031 7327 7285 7246 7202 1,74 1,66 1,28 1,43

Croatia 1905 1840 1096 812 4398 4262 4247 4225 4,33 4,32 2,58 1,92

Cyprus 78 144 55 32 862 866 858 847 0,90 1,66 0,64 0,38

Czech Republic 547 481 370 340 10505 10516 10512 10538 0,52 0,46 0,35 0,32

Denmark 103 84 66 45 5581 5603 5617 5660 0,18 0,15 0,12 0,08

Estonia 301 237 187 190 1340 1320 1316 1313 2,25 1,80 1,42 1,45

Finland 314 315 185 177 5401 5427 5451 5472 0,58 0,58 0,34 0,32

France 1344 1536 1142 1088 65398 65579 65835 66352 0,21 0,23 0,17 0,16

Georgia 367 157 102 80 4498 4498 4490 4490 0,82 0,35 0,23 0,18

Germany 1492 1525 1026 789 81844 80524 80767 81174 0,18 0,19 0,13 0,10

Greece 722 728 585 457 11291 11063 10927 10812 0,64 0,66 0,54 0,42

Hungary 735 991 2403 4235 9958 9909 9877 9849 0,74 1,00 2,43 4,30

Iceland 10 9 28 10 320 322 326 329 0,31 0,28 0,86 0,30

Ireland 55 62 33 18 4583 4591 4605 4626 0,12 0,14 0,07 0,04

Italy 3246 3180 5490 1935 60821 59685 60783 60796 0,53 0,53 0,90 0,32

Latvia 286 322 298 246 2042 2024 2001 1986 1,40 1,59 1,49 1,24

Liechtenstein 16 7 12 13 36 37 37 37 4,44 1,89 3,24 3,51

Lithuania 373 428 387 377 3008 2972 2943 2921 1,24 1,44 1,31 1,29

Luxemburg 31 38 23 22 525 537 550 563 0,59 0,71 0,42 0,39

Malta 26 50 39 24 416 421 425 429 0,63 1,19 0,92 0,56

Republic of Moldova 934 1354 1101 1011 3560 3559 3559 3555 2,62 3,80 3,09 2,84

Monaco 5 10 4 9 36 36 36 36 1,39 2,78 1,11 2,50

Montenegro 180 289 158 129 618 623 622 622 2,91 4,64 2,54 2,07

Netherlands 675 778 674 496 16730 16780 16829 16901 0,40 0,46 0,40 0,29

Norway 101 148 141 73 4986 5051 5108 5166 0,20 0,29 0,28 0,14

Poland 4071 3968 2747 2182 38538 38533 38018 38006 1,06 1,03 0,72 0,57

Portugal 217 267 252 233 10542 10487 10427 10375 0,21 0,25 0,24 0,22

Romania 6768 5413 4425 4606 21356 20020 19947 19861 3,17 2,70 2,22 2,32 Russia 10746 12328 8913 6009 143056 143507 143667 146267 0,75 0,86 0,62 0,41

San Marino 1 4 5 4 32 34 34 33 0,31 1,18 1,47 1,21

Serbia 4894 5058 2786 1236 7241 7182 7147 7112 6,76 7,04 3,90 1,74

Slovak Republic 531 464 324 353 5404 5411 5416 5421 0,98 0,86 0,60 0,65

Slovenia 422 496 352 212 2055 2059 2061 2063 2,05 2,41 1,71 1,03

Spain 694 781 642 553 46196 46728 46512 46440 0,15 0,17 0,14 0,12

Sweden 546 362 272 213 9483 9556 9645 9747 0,58 0,38 0,28 0,22

Switzerland 326 442 304 318 7955 8039 8140 8237 0,41 0,55 0,37 0,39

"The former Yugoslav

Republic of Macedonia" 350 535 382 362 2060 2062 2066 2069 1,70 2,59 1,85 1,75

Turkey 8986 3505 1584 2208 74724 75627 76668 77696 1,20 0,46 0,21 0,28

Ukraine 7791 13132 14181 6010 45453 45373 45246 45246 1,71 2,89 3,13 1,33 United Kingdom 1702 908 720 575 62990 63905 64351 64767 0,27 0,14 0,11 0,09

Total 0,79 0,80 0,68

Applications allocated to a judicial formation

Population (1000)

Allocated/population (10000)

(12)

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2015

Table 3 The Court’s total caseload by stage of proceedings and judicial formation

State

Single Judge or Committee (cat. VI - VII)

Chamber or Committee - awaiting first examination

(cat. I - V)

Communicated

Pending Government

action

Admissible TOTAL

Albania 8 171 228 1 408

Andorra 1 2 1 4

Armenia 54 825 92 7 978

Austria 36 37 61 1 135

Azerbaijan 7 1228 279 8 1522

Belgium 15 282 43 8 348

Bosnia and Herzegovina 73 291 52 420 4 840

Bulgaria 80 531 168 15 794

Croatia 38 244 214 10 506

Cyprus 8 32 17 2 59

Czech Republic 29 58 56 9 152

Denmark 2 17 10 1 30

Estonia 28 30 12 1 71

Finland 6 1 6 1 14

France 85 135 157 11 388

Georgia 16 1991 147 2154

Germany 71 93 42 6 212

Greece 18 666 178 30 892

Hungary 94 3981 471 71 4617

Iceland 13 6 19

Ireland 3 2 5

Italy 202 5614 1697 20 34 7567

Latvia 28 63 63 5 159

Liechtenstein 2 1 2 1 6

Lithuania 80 199 68 16 363

Luxembourg 1 1 5 7

Malta 2 24 21 7 54

Republic of Moldova 69 803 339 1 11 1223

Monaco 1 2 3

Montenegro 39 53 76 3 171

Netherlands 50 171 46 6 273

Norway 12 43 6 1 62

Poland 261 585 821 14 1681

Portugal 4 210 103 9 326

Romania 311 1128 1884 165 48 3536

Russia 732 4742 3121 547 65 9207

San Marino 5 1 6

Serbia 114 363 209 451 5 1142

Slovakia 35 110 34 9 188

Slovenia 30 172 38 1409 5 1654

Spain 23 8 53 3 87

Sweden 16 7 14 6 43

Switzerland 20 61 42 7 130

"The former Yugoslav

Republic of Macedonia" 12 173 67 12 264

Turkey 199 6656 1526 65 8446

Ukraine 208 4160 9439 25 13832

United Kingdom 26 125 95 10 256

ALL STATES 3147 36107 22013 3013 554 64834

(13)

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2015

Table 4 Unilateral declarations and friendly settlements from 2013 to 2015

State

2013 2014 2015 2013 2014 2015

Albania 1 14

Andorra Armenia

Austria 0 1 8 2

Azerbaijan 3 11 6 11 23 19

Belgium 0 3 1 1

Bosnia and Herzegovina 3 1 176 0 5

Bulgaria 4 3 5 19 9 4

Croatia 3 3 9 31 36 36

Cyprus

Czech Republic 20 1 12 1 5

Denmark 1

Estonia 1 1

Finland 1 0 1 3 1

France 2 9 3 2 4 1

Georgia 3 14 14 11 15 12

Germany 2 3 2 3 2

Greece 0 24 55 54 128

Hungary 3 1 73 31 61

Iceland

Ireland 1 3 0

Italy 44 27 1853 4 9 9

Latvia 0 2 1 4

Liechtenstein

Lithuania 1 1

Luxembourg

Malta 2

Republic of Moldova 21 6 4 8 9 1

Monaco

Montenegro 0 19 10 1

Netherlands 1 1 1 2 4 2

Norway

Poland 41 26 33 93 83 113

Portugal 5 6 7 4 39 31

Romania 38 64 116 29 51 168

Russia 102 161 194 39 78 43

San Marino

Serbia 9 52 9 679 1016 291

Slovakia 4 3 4 23 9 20

Slovenia 1 1 1 1

Spain 1 1

Sweden 2

Switzerland

The former Yugoslav Republic

of Macedonia' 48 38 5 55 69 19

Turkey 27 2 18 86 84 139

Unilateral declaration Friendly settlement

(14)

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2015

Country-specific information Albania

Chart 9 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body

Graph 10 Major procedural steps in processing applications

Single Judge or Committee (cat. VI - VII)

8 2%

Chamber or Committee - awaiting first examination

(cat. I - V) 171 42%

Communicated 228 56%

Admissible 1 0%

Total applications 408

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160

2013 2014 2015

106

82

147

48

129

79 70

38

99

9

21 22

Applications allocated to a judicial formation

Applications declared inadmissible or struck out

Applications communicated to the Government

Applications in which judgments delivered

(15)

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2015

Andorra

Chart 11 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body

Graph 12 Major procedural steps in processing applications

Chamber or Committee - awaiting first examination

(cat. I - V) 1 25%

Communicated 2 50%

Admissible 1 25%

Total applications 4

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

2013 2014 2015

2

5 6 6

2

6

0

1 1

0 0 0

Applications allocated to a judicial formation

Applications declared inadmissible or struck out

Applications communicated to the Government

Applications in which judgments delivered

(16)

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2015

Armenia

Chart 13 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body

Graph 14 Major procedural steps in processing applications

Single Judge or Committee (cat. VI - VII)

54 6%

Chamber or Committee - awaiting first examination

(cat. I - V) 825 84%

Communicated 92 9%

Admissible 7 0,7%

Total applications 978

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200

2013 2014 2015

196

156

122 195

56

178

19 16 25

2 4 9

Applications allocated to a judicial formation

Applications declared inadmissible or struck out

Applications communicated to the Government

Applications in which judgments delivered

(17)

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2015

Austria

Chart 15 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body

Graph 16 Major procedural steps in processing applications

Single Judge or Committee (cat. VI - VII)

36 27%

Chamber or Committee - awaiting first examination

(cat. I - V) 37 27%

Communicated 61 45%

Admissible 1 1%

Total applications 135

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700

2013 2014 2015

437

315

263 611

387

241

27 18 33

22 7 7

Applications allocated to a judicial formation

Applications declared inadmissible or struck out

Applications communicated to the Government

Applications in which judgments delivered

(18)

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2015

Azerbaijan

Chart 17 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body

Graph 18 Major procedural steps in processing applications

Single Judge or Committee (cat. VI - VII)

7 0,5%

Chamber or Committee - awaiting first examination

(cat. I - V) 1228 80,7%

Communicated 279 18,3%

Admissible 8 0,5%

Total applications 1 522

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450

2013 2014 2015

324

402

268 284

245

123

115 117 106

13 11

30 Applications allocated to a judicial

formation

Applications declared inadmissible or struck out

Applications communicated to the Government

Applications in which judgments delivered

(19)

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2015

Belgium

Chart 19 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body

Graph 20 Major procedural steps in processing applications

Single Judge or Committee (cat. VI - VII)

15 4%

Chamber or Committee - awaiting first examination

(cat. I - V) 282 81%

Communicated 43 13%

Admissible 8 2%

Total applications 348

0 50 100 150 200 250 300

2013 2014 2015

270

159

202 253

145

198

37 22

26 9

19 19

Applications allocated to a judicial formation

Applications declared inadmissible or struck out

Applications communicated to the Government

Applications in which judgments delivered

(20)

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2015

Bosnia and Herzegovina

Chart 21 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body

Graph 22 Major procedural steps in processing applications

Single Judge or Committee (cat. VI - VII)

73

9% Chamber or Committee -

awaiting first examination (cat. I - V)

291 35%

Communicated 52 6%

Pending Government action

420 50%

Admissible 4 0%

Total applications 840

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200

2013 2014 2015

870

667

908 1019

1185

790

213

4

26 11 52

10 Applications allocated to a judicial

formation

Applications declared inadmissible or struck out

Applications communicated to the Government

Applications in which judgments delivered

(21)

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2015

Bulgaria

Chart 23 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body

Graph 24 Major procedural steps in processing applications

Single Judge or Committee (cat. VI - VII)

80 10%

Chamber or Committee - awaiting first examination

(cat. I - V) 531 67%

Communicated 168 21%

Admissible 15 2%

Total applications 794

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000

2013 2014 2015

1209

928

1031 2552

2381

1176

44 77 102

26 21 37

Applications allocated to a judicial formation

Applications declared inadmissible or struck out

Applications communicated to the Government

Applications in which judgments delivered

(22)

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2015

Croatia

Chart 25 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body

Graph 26 Major procedural steps in processing applications

Single Judge or Committee (cat. VI - VII)

38 8%

Chamber or Committee - awaiting first examination

(cat. I - V) 244 48%

Communicated 214 42%

Admissible 10 2%

Total applications 506

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500

2013 2014 2015

1840

1096

812 2047

1491

832

142 115 144

24 33 25

Applications allocated to a judicial formation

Applications declared inadmissible or struck out

Applications communicated to the Government

Applications in which judgments delivered

(23)

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2015

Cyprus

Chart 27 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body

Graph 28 Major procedural steps in processing applications

Single Judge or Committee (cat. VI - VII)

8 14%

Chamber or Committee - awaiting first examination

(cat. I - V) 32 54%

Communicated 17 29%

Admissible 2 3%

Total applications 59

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180

2013 2014 2015

144

55

32

163 155

24

3 3

1 7

0

20 Applications allocated to a judicial

formation

Applications declared inadmissible or struck out

Applications communicated to the Government

Applications in which judgments delivered

(24)

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2015

Czech Republic

Chart 29 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body

Graph 30 Major procedural steps in processing applications

Single Judge or Committee (cat. VI - VII)

29 19%

Chamber or Committee - awaiting first examination

(cat. I - V) 58 38%

Communicated 56 37%

Admissible 9 6%

Total applications 152

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900

2013 2014 2015

481

370

340 827

735

403

36

12 45

11 13 4

Applications allocated to a judicial formation

Applications declared inadmissible or struck out

Applications communicated to the Government

Applications in which judgments delivered

(25)

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2015

Denmark

Chart 31 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body

Graph 32 Major procedural steps in processing applications

Single Judge or Committee (cat. VI - VII)

2 7%

Chamber or Committee - awaiting first examination

(cat. I - V) 17 57%

Communicated 10 33%

Admissible 1 3%

Total applications 30

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

2013 2014 2015

84

66

45 88

60

48

6 5

0 2 0 0

Applications allocated to a judicial formation

Applications declared inadmissible or struck out

Applications communicated to the Government

Applications in which judgments delivered

(26)

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2015

Estonia

Chart 33 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body

Graph 34 Major procedural steps in processing applications

Single Judge or Committee (cat. VI - VII)

28 39,4%

Chamber or Committee - awaiting first examination

(cat. I - V) 30 42,3%

Communicated 12 16,9%

Admissible 1 1,4%

Total applications 71

0 100 200 300 400 500 600

2013 2014 2015

237

187 190

533

451

181

9 6 9 7 4 5

Applications allocated to a judicial formation

Applications declared inadmissible or struck out

Applications communicated to the Government

Applications in which judgments delivered

(27)

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2015

Finland

Chart 35 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body

Graph 36 Major procedural steps in processing applications

Single Judge or Committee (cat. VI - VII)

6 42,9%

Chamber or Committee - awaiting first examination

(cat. I - V) 1 7,1%

Communicated 6 42,9%

Admissible 1 7,1%

Total applications 14

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350

2013 2014 2015

315

185 177

300

272 256

21

8 6

3 12 7

Applications allocated to a judicial formation

Applications declared inadmissible or struck out

Applications communicated to the Government

Applications in which judgments delivered

(28)

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2015

France

Chart 37 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body

Graph 38 Major procedural steps in processing applications

Single Judge or Committee (cat. VI - VII)

85 22%

Chamber or Committee - awaiting first examination

(cat. I - V) 135 35%

Communicated 157 40%

Admissible 11 3%

Total applications 388

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500

2013 2014 2015

1536

1142 1088

2391

1273

1156

74 89 103

36 24 33

Applications allocated to a judicial formation

Applications declared inadmissible or struck out

Applications communicated to the Government

Applications in which judgments delivered

(29)

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2015

Georgia

Chart 39 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body

Graph 40 Major procedural steps in processing applications

Single Judge or Committee (cat. VI - VII)

16 1%

Chamber or Committee - awaiting first examination

(cat. I - V) 1991

92%

Communicated 147 7%

Total applications 2154

0 100 200 300 400 500 600

2013 2014 2015

157

102 80

579

273

197

38 28 47

2 3 4

Applications allocated to a judicial formation

Applications declared inadmissible or struck out

Applications communicated to the Government

Applications in which judgments delivered

(30)

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2015

Germany

Chart 41 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body

Graph 42 Major procedural steps in processing applications

Single Judge or Committee (cat. VI - VII)

71 33%

Chamber or Committee - awaiting first examination

(cat. I - V) 93 44%

Communicated 42 20%

Admissible 6 3%

Total applications 212

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

2013 2014 2015

1525

1026

789 3033

1182

901

24 25 23

7 13 12

Applications allocated to a judicial formation

Applications declared inadmissible or struck out

Applications communicated to the Government

Applications in which judgments delivered

(31)

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2015

Greece

Chart 43 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body

Graph 44 Major procedural steps in processing applications

Single Judge or Committee (cat. VI - VII)

18 2%

Chamber or Committee - awaiting first examination

(cat. I - V) 666 75%

Communicated 178 20%

Admissible 30 3%

Total applications 892

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800

2013 2014 2015

728

585

472 457

554

670

188

268

118

43

126 94

Applications allocated to a judicial formation

Applications declared inadmissible or struck out

Applications communicated to the Government

Applications in which judgments delivered

References

Related documents

The reports of usability studies and controlled experiments are helpful to understand the potential and limitations of our tools, but we need to consider other evaluation

Advanced Quantitative Reasoning is designed to reinforce, build on, and solidify students’ working knowledge of Algebra 1,2, Geometry 1,2, and Algebra 3,4; develop

The third cluster comprises 32 athletes with high results in beliefs that ability and external factors are causes of success, average results in both performance goals, the

To keep in touch with our efforts in this area, and for many useful resources, please see our new “Public Safety, Homeland Security and Defense” website

Zero Error and Zero Correction in a Screw Gauge: Usually, in a Screw Gauge, the zero of the circular scale, coincides with the base line of the main scale as shown below and we

buried oxide trifluoromethane capacitance equivalent thickness complementary metal oxide semiconductor coplanar waveguide capacitance-voltage direct-current drain induced

As part of some cluster deployments, the MediaCentral Platform Services 2.0 Installation and Configuration Guide provided instructions for replicating the cluster file caches

“Perfect genuineness” is an inadequate translation of a term that denotes a type of perfection, or ethical perfection, that characterizes both the action of Heaven, or Tian (as