• No results found

Unjust Enrichment for Copyright Holders?

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Unjust Enrichment for Copyright Holders?"

Copied!
6
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

|Review and Debate Sectin|

Thank You

Kenya

1 year better

We’re 1 Year

Better

The

Obama

Factor

Kenyan ICC

Cases

|| Also Inside ||

Assininity contained within our Laws

(2)

|Review and Debate Sectin|

I speak in the spirit voice of comity, of the American Father of Nation, Abraham Lincoln. We should be irrevocably cut off from our past, and be forced to splice the ragged ends of our lives upon whatever new conditions chance might leave dangling for us. I confess that I had my doubts at first whether the support of our Kenyan Law Students were not too narrowly institutionalized to embrace the proportions of a national peril, an all Kenyan Legal Magazine. Men acting gregariously are always in extremes; as they are one moment capable of higher courage, so they are liable, the next, to baser depression, and it is often a matter of chance whether numbers shall multiply confidence or discouragement. The only faith that wears well and holds its color in all weathers is that which is woven of conviction and set with the sharp mordant of experience For the imposibility of every man is rendered null by birth, I extend this rhetoric to appraise the possibilities am optimistic about on Kenyan Legal. I am particular about success, for I know me and my team are right on our way to it, and even so, mine is beyond success to significance; for Enthusiasm is good material for me as a learning orator, but for progress we need something more durable to working,--must be able to rely on the deliberate reason and consequent firmness of the people, without which, the will to go on will be wanting at the critical moment; am staying put.

Welcome.

REGARDS,

Michael

Michael Opondo O. Managing Editor, KENYAN LEGAL

|Editorial |

“I confess that I had

my doubts at first…

[but] For the

imposibility of every

man is rendered null by

birth, I extend this

rhetoric to appraise the

possibilities am

optimistic about on

(3)

|Review and Debate Sectin|

The Kenyan Legal Team

The Secretariat

Michael O. Opondo

: Managing Editor.

Sheila Mokaya

: Assistant Editor.

Cindy Amuka

: Associate Editor.

Patricia Ngare

: Content Manager.

Dennis Gicheru

: Director Partnerships

Anthony Mwangi

: Co-Director

Partnerships.

Arnold Odiembo

: Director

Communications.

Linda Wangui

: Co-Director

Communications.

The Branch Co-Ordinators

Kenneth Kimathi

: Kenyatta University

(School of Law)

Gabriel Pelu

: J.K.U.A.T (School of Law)

Hamida Abass

: Strathmore University

(School of Law)

Duncan Ombo

: Mt. Kenya University

(School of Law)

Lujain Abass:

Riara University (School

of Law)

Anita Simiyu

: Kabarak University

(School of Law)

Victor Kaula

: Moi University (School

of Law)

Bonventure Otieno

: CUEA (School of

Law)

(4)

|Kenyan Legal Magazine|

To participate in the next issue, please send articles, with your personal details and picture to:

kenyanlegal@gmail.com c.c mail@kenyanlegal.com

Disclaimer:

Whilst every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information in this magazine, the authors, publisher and editor accepts no responsibility for any loss, financial or otherwise by any person using this publication.

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means, including photocopying, recording, or other electronic or mechanical methods, without the prior written permission of the publisher, except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical reviews and certain other noncommercial uses permitted by copyright law. For permission requests,

write to the publisher, addressed “Attention: Permissions Coordinator,” at the address

mail@kenyanlegal.com or kenyanlegal@gmail.com

Copyright protected by Creative Commons ©Kenyan Legal 2014

All Rights Reserved. www.kenyanlegal.com

The Kenyan Legal Secretariat members during the 1

st

Anniversary Celebrations: (Left to Right)

Dennis Gicheru (Partnerships Director), Cindy Amuka (Associate Editor), Linda Wangui (Communications

Co-Director), Michael Opondo (Managing Editor), Patricia Ngare (Content Manager), Arnold Otieno (Communications

Director), and Anthony Mwangi (Partnerships Co-Director).

Absent from picture is Sheilla Mokaya (Assistant Editor)

(5)

|Kenyan Legal Magazine|

Unjust Enrichment for Copyright Holders?

By Jack Ogonda, 3rd Year; Kenyatta University,

School of Law he recent announcement by the Music

Copyright Society Association of Kenya, to put into place measures to ensure that copyright holders get their royalties from those using their works

publicly has fueled a robust debate on the matter. This was specifically directed at matatu operators who play music to entertain their customers which is very auspicious because I can imagine how boring travelling in those buses would be (even though the association has been in place since).

Thanks to the Copyright Act that has made it possible for the owners of copyrights to receive royalties for use of their works in different spheres, and redress is also available in instances of infringement. The MCSK, herein

fore referred to as the Music Copyright Association of Kenya, has had a sharp rise in the number of those registering with it to wit the number sky-rocketed in the year 2007 from 400 to 3,593 in 2009.

Essentially, musicians and producers who are copyright owners assign their rights to the MCSK who in turn offer licenses to people who use such works publicly or for commercial gain: radio and television broadcasters, and even businesses playing music for gain. Among the duties of MCSK is to license the use of recorded music on behalf of the thousands of performers and record companies.

Consequently, any person who wishes to use recorded music in the operation of his business - televisions and radio stations, online streaming services, hundreds of thousands of shops, pubs,

and night clubs- must pay for a license from MCSK. The fact that copyright owners receive

royalties through the MCSK’s licensing of radio

and television stations and at the same time receive another extra amount from people playing the same music via the licensed radio and television stations is absurd.

While the Act has been very efficacious in the growth of the music and literary industry, it has also imposed draconian and unnecessary fines on certain classes of people in our society. And this is evident in the twofold manner in which these regulations have, has or will be applying. This is pertinent because there is one aspect of a matatu owner/ business person playing recorded music

T

“In as much as I strongly

support the rights of copyright

holders to earn what is rightfully

theirs, it would be very absurd to

have one pay for recorded music

that that royalty has already been

(6)

|Kenyan Legal Magazine|

and another where he/she plays music from a radio station.

Is it therefore right and justiciable for the MCSK to impose charges on a matatu operator who has only tuned into a local radio station to listen to a morning talk show irrespective of whether it is intended to entice customers or not. This is a manifestation of flagrant exploitation arising from laws that were meant to ensure the betterment of Kenyans; the same is akin to double charges so that there is an element of unjust enrichment for copyright holders.

That using a radio station to entertain one’s

revelers adds value to the business so that you have to pay, is a an argument that I find very preposterous. In as much as I strongly support the rights of copyright holders to earn what is rightfully theirs, it would be very absurd to have one pay for recorded music that that royalty has already been paid. However, this should not be

confused with charges for playing recorded music (not through a broadcasting station) which I do support.

Consider this scenario: I am a matatu operator and I use a local radio station to entertain my passengers, so I tune into a morning talk show and clearly I do not know whether they will talk throughout the show without playing any music, which is impossible. But then do I pay for entertaining my passengers with the interesting discussions in the talk show or for the music played or both.

Is this not very analogous to being charged fifty shillings for a loaf of bread and then when I take it to my family, they are also charged additional ten shillings for eating it.

By Jack Gonda,

3rd Year; Kenyatta University,

References

Related documents

In Figure 7.10 (b) is computed the evolution of the volume fraction of small drops in the spray, V 150, as a function of the salt concentration in the aqueous phase of the

Figure 5 shows the popularity of various biometrics used to develop person identification technologies.. The popularity is determined by these key factors:

16 According to the ISA account, although we can have non-interpretive access to our own sensory and affective states, the self-attribution of propositional

[r]

People of this country are aware that in the case of citizenship of Professor Ghulam Azam, former Ameer of Jamaat-e-Islami, the then Attorney General as the leading counsel on behalf

, Perdue and S Kieselbach 1988 The Impact of Tourism Development on Residents Perceptions of Community Life Bivariate regression analysis Satisfaction Andereck,

proposed that when integrating new methodologies into HRI research, a stepwise process should occur. One emerging methodology, mobile brain imaging, can be used for

ICT usage patterns among SMEs in Albania show a progression from the use of the Internet for communication (primarily e-mail) to use of the Internet for