• No results found

Anti-periodic boundary value problems involving nonlinear fractional q-difference equations

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Anti-periodic boundary value problems involving nonlinear fractional q-difference equations"

Copied!
8
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Anti-periodic boundary value problems involving nonlinear

fractional

q-difference equations

Wengui Yang

Ministry of Public Education, Sanmenxia Polytechnic, Sanmenxia 472200, China.

Abstract

In this paper, we consider a class of anti-periodic boundary value problems involving nonlinear fractional

q-difference equations. Some existence and uniqueness results are obtained by applying some standard fixed point theorems. As applications, some examples are presented to illustrate the main results.

Keywords: Fractionalq-difference equations, anti-periodic boundary conditions, existence and uniqueness, fixed point theorem.

2010 MSC:34B18, 39A13. 2012 MJM. All rights reserved.c

1

Introduction

Anti-periodic boundary value problems occur in the mathematical modeling of a variety of physical pro-cesses and have recently received considerable attention. For examples and details of anti-periodic boundary conditions, see [2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 10] and the references therein.

The q-difference calculus or quantum calculus is an old subject that was initially developed by Jackson [17, 18], basic definitions and properties ofq-difference calculus can be found in the book mentioned in [19].

The fractional q-difference calculus had its origin in the works by Al-Salam [8] and Agarwal [1]. More recently, maybe due to the explosion in research within the fractional differential calculus setting, new develop-ments in this theory of fractionalq-difference calculus were made, for example,q-analogues of the integral and differential fractional operators properties such as theq-Laplace transform,q-Taylor’s formula, Mittage-Leffler function [9, 22, 23], just to mention some.

Recently, boundary value problems of nonlinear fractionalq-difference equations have aroused considerable attention. Many people pay attention to the existence and multiplicity of solutions or positive solutions for boundary value problems of nonlinear fractionalq-difference equations by means of some fixed point theorems, such as the Krasnosel’skii fixed-point theorem, the Leggett-Williams fixed-point theorem, and the Schauder fixed-point theorem, For examples, see [11, 12, 20, 21, 26, 27, 28] and the references therein. Graef and Kong [16] investigated the uniqueness, existence, and nonexistence of positive solutions for the boundary value problem with fractionalq-derivatives in terms of different ranges ofλ. Ahmad et al. [6] studied the following nonlinear fractional q-difference equation with nonlocal boundary conditions by applying some well-known tools of fixed point theory such as Banach contraction principle, Krasnoselskiis fixed point theorem, and the Leray-Schauder nonlinear alternative. Zhao et al. [29] considered some existence results of positive solutions to nonlocalq-integral boundary value problem of nonlinear fractionalq-derivatives equation using the generalized Banach contraction principle, the monotone iterative method, and Krasnoselskii’s fixed point theorem.

El-Shahed and Hassan [13] studied the existence of positive solutions of the q-difference boundary value problem

−(D2

qu)(t) =a(t)f(u(t)), 0≤t≤1,

αu(0)−βDqu(0) = 0, γu(1)−δDqu(1) = 0.

(2)

Ferreira [14] and [15] considered the existence of positive solutions to nonlinearq-difference boundary value problems

−(Dα

qu)(t) =−f(t, u(t)), 0≤t≤1, 1< α≤2

u(0) =u(1) = 0,

and

(Dαqu)(t) =−f(t, u(t)), 0≤t≤1, 2< α≤3,

u(0) = (Dqu)(0) = 0, (Dqu)(1) =β ≥0,

respectively. By applying a fixed point theorem in cones, sufficient conditions for the existence of nontrivial solutions were enunciated.

In this paper, we investigate the existence and uniqueness results for anti-periodic boundary value problems involving nonlinear fractionalq-difference equations given by

(cDα

qu)(t) =f(t, u(t)), t∈[0,1], 1< α≤2,

u(0) =−u(1), (Du)(0) =−(Du)(1), (1.1)

wherecDα

q denotes the Caputo fractionalq-derivative of orderα, andf : [0,1]×R→Ris a given continuous function. Our results are based on some standard fixed point theorems.

2

Preliminaries

For theconvenience of the reader, we present some necessary definitions and lemmas of fractionalq-calculus theory to facilitate analysis of problem (1.1). These details can be found in the recent literature; see [19] and references therein. Letq∈(0,1) and define

[a]q =

qa1

q−1 , a∈R. Theq-analogue of the power (a−b)n withn∈N0is

(a−b)(0)= 1, (a−b)(n)= n−1

Y

k=0

(a−bqk), n∈N, a, b∈R.

More generally, ifα∈R, then

(a−b)(α)=aα

Y

n=0

a−bqn a−bqα+n. Note that, ifb= 0 thena(α)=aα. Theq-gamma function is defined by

Γq(x) =(1−q)

(x−1)

(1−q)x−1 , x∈R\ {0,−1,−2, . . .},

and satisfies Γq(x+ 1) = [x]qΓq(x).

Theq-derivative of a functionf is here defined by

(Dqf)(x) =

f(x)−f(qx)

(1−q)x , (Dqf)(0) = limx→0(Dqf)(x),

andq-derivatives of higher order by

(D0qf)(x) =f(x) and (Dnqf)(x) =Dq(Dqn−1f)(x), n∈N. Theq-integral of a functionf defined in the interval [0, b] is given by

(Iqf)(x) =

Z x

0

f(t)dqt=x(1−q)

X

n=0

(3)

Ifa∈[0, b] andf is defined in the interval [0, b], its integral fromato bis defined by

Z b

a

f(t)dqt=

Z b

0

f(t)dqt−

Z a

0

f(t)dqt.

Similarly as done for derivatives, an operator In

q can be defined, namely,

(Iq0f)(x) =f(x) and (Iqnf)(x) =Iq(Iqn−1f)(x), n∈N. The fundamental theorem of calculus applies to these operators Iq andDq, i.e.,

(DqIqf)(x) =f(x), and iff is continuous atx= 0, then

(IqDqf)(x) =f(x)−f(0).

Basic properties of the two operators can be found in the book [19]. We now point out three formulas that will be used later (iDq denotes the derivative with respect to variablei)

[a(t−s)](α)=aα(t−s)(α), tDq(t−s)(α)= [α]q(t−s)(α−1),

xDq

Z x

0

f(x, t)dqt

(x) =

Z x

0

xDqf(x, t)dqt+f(qx, x). We note that if α >0 anda≤b≤t, then (t−a)(α)(tb)(α) [14].

Definition 2.1 ([24]). Letα≥0 andf be function defined on [0,1]. The fractionalq-integral of the Riemann-Liouville type isI0

qf(x) =f(x) and (Iqαf)(x) = 1

Γq(α)

Z x

0

(x−qt)(α−1)f(t)dqt, α >0, x∈[0,1].

Definition 2.2 ([24]). The fractionalq-derivative of the Riemann-Liouville type of orderα≥0 is defined by

D0

qf(x) =f(x) and

(Dqαf)(x) = (DqmIqm−αf)(x), α >0,

where mis the smallest integer greater than or equal toα.

Definition 2.3 ([24]). The fractionalq-derivative of the Caputo type of orderα≥0 is defined by (cDqαf)(x) = (Iqm−αDqmf)(x), α >0,

where mis the smallest integer greater than or equal toα.

Lemma 2.1 ([14]). Let α, β≥0 andf be a function defined on[0,1]. Then the next formulas hold:

(1) (Iβ

qIqαf)(x) =Iqα+βf(x), (2) (Dα

qIqαf)(x) =f(x).

Lemma 2.2 ([14]). Let α >0 andα∈R+\N. Then the following equality holds:

(IqαcDαqf)(x) =f(x)− m−1

X

k=0

xk

Γq(k+ 1)

(Dkqf)(0),

where mis the smallest integer greater than or equal to α.

Lemma 2.3. For anyy∈C[0,1], the unique solution of the linear fractional boundary value problem

(cDα

qu)(t) =y(t), t∈[0,1], 1< α≤2,

u(0) =−u(1), (Du)(0) =−(Du)(1), (2.2)

is given by

u(t) =

Z 1

0

(4)

where

G(t, s) =

    

   

2(t−s)(α−1)(1s)(α−1)

2Γq(α) +

(1−2t)(1−s)(α−2)

4Γq(α−1) , 0≤s≤t≤1, −(1−s)

(α−1)

2Γq(α) +

(1−2t)(1−s)(α−2)

4Γq(α−1) , 0≤t≤s≤1.

(2.3)

Proof. We may apply Lemma 2.1 and Lemma 2.2; we see that

u(t) = 1 Γq(α)

Z t

0

(t−qs)(α−1)y(s)dqs+c1+c2t. (2.4)

Differentiating both sides of (2.4), we obtain

(Dqu)(t) = 1 Γq(α−1)

Z t

0

(t−qs)(α−2)y(s)dqs+c2.

Applying the boundary conditions for the problem (2.2), we find that

c1=

1 2Γ(α)

Z 1

0

(1−s)(α−1)y(s)dqs− 1 4Γ(α−1)

Z 1

0

(1−s)(α−2)y(s)dqs,

c2=

1 2Γq(α−1)

Z 1

0

(1−s)(α−2)y(s)dqs.

Thus, the unique solution of (2.2) is

u(t) =

Z t

0

(t−qs)(α−1)

Γq(α) y(s)dqs− 1 2

Z 1

0

(1−qs)(α−1)

Γq(α) y(s)dqs− 1−2t

4

Z 1

0

(1−qs)(α−2) Γq(α−1) y(s)dqs =

Z 1

0

G(t, qs)y(s)dqs,

whereG(t, s) is given by (2.3). This completes the proof.

3

Main results

In this section, we establish some sufficient conditions for the existence and uniqueness of solutions for boundary value problem (1.1).

LetC=C([0,1],R) denote the Banach space of all continuous functions from [0,1]→Rendowed with the

norm defined bykuk= sup{|u(t)|, t∈[0,1]}.

Now we state some known fixed point theorems which are needed to prove the existence of solutions for (1.1).

Theorem 3.1 ([25]). Let X be a Banach space. Assume thatT :X →X is a completely continuous operator and the setV ={u∈X|u=µT u,0< µ <1} is bounded. ThenT has a fixed point inX.

Theorem 3.2 ([25]). Let X be a Banach space. Assume that Ωis an open bounded subset of X with θ∈Ω

and letT : Ω→X be a completely continuous operator such that

kT uk ≤ kuk, ∀u∈∂Ω.

ThenT has a fixed point inΩ.

We define, in relation to (1.1), an operatorT :CCas follows

(T u)(t) =

Z t

0

(t−qs)(α−1)

Γq(α) f(s, u(s))dqs− 1 2

Z 1

0

(1−qs)(α−1)

Γq(α) f(s, u(s))dqs −1−2t

4

Z 1

0

(1−qs)(α−2)

(5)

Theorem 3.3. Assume that there exists a positive constantM such that|f(t, u)| ≤M fort∈[0,1]andu∈C.

Then the problem (1.1) has at least one solution.

Proof. We show, as a first step, that the operator T is completely continuous. Clearly, continuity of the operatorT follows from the continuity off. Let Ω∈Cbe bounded. Then,u∈Ω together with the assumption

|f(t, u)| ≤M, we get

|(T u)(t)| ≤

Z t

0

(t−qs)(α−1)

Γq(α)

|f(s, u(s))|dqs+ 1 2

Z 1

0

(1−qs)(α−1)

Γq(α)

|f(s, u(s))|dqs

+|1−2t| 4

Z 1

0

(1−qs)(α−2)

Γq(α−1)

|f(s, u(s))|dqs

≤ M

Z t

0

(t−qs)(α−1) Γq(α) dqs+

1 2

Z 1

0

(1−qs)(α−1) Γq(α) dqs+

|1−2t| 4

Z 1

0

(1−qs)(α−2) Γq(α−1) dqs

≤ M(3Γq(α) + Γq(α+ 1)) 2Γq(α)Γq(α+ 1) =M2, which implies thatk(T u)(t)k ≤M2. Furthermore,

|Dq(T u)(t)| ≤

Z t

0

(t−qs)(α−2)

Γq(α−1)

|f(s, u(s))|dqs+ 1 2

Z 1

0

(1−qs)(α−2)

Γq(α−1)

|f(s, u(s))|dqs

≤ M

Z t

0

(t−qs)(α−2)

Γq(α−1)

dqs+ 1 2

Z 1

0

(1−qs)(α−2)

Γq(α−1)

dqs

≤ 3M

2Γq(α) =M3, Hence, for t1, t2∈[0,1],t1< t2, we have

|(T u)(t2)−(T u)(t1)| ≤

Z t2

t1

|Dq(T u)(s)|dqs≤M3(t2−t1).

This implies thatT is equicontinuous on [0,1]. Thus, by the Arzela-Ascoli theorem, the operatorT :C→Cis

completely continuous.

Next, we consider the set V = {u∈ X|u=µT u,0 < µ < 1}, and show that the set V is bounded. Let

u∈V; then u=µT u, 0< µ <1. For anyt∈[0,1], we have

|u(t)|=µ|(T u)(t)| ≤ |(T u)(t)|=M2.

Thus, kuk ≤ M2 for any t ∈ [0,1]. So, the set V is bounded. Thus, by the conclusion of Theorem 3.1,

the operator T has at least one fixed point, which implies that (1.1) has at least one solution. The proof is complete.

Theorem 3.4. Letlimu→0f(t, u)/u= 0. Then the problem (1.1) has at least one solution.

Proof. Since limu→0f(t, u)/u = 0, there therefore exists a constant r > 0 such that|f(t, u)| ≤δ|u| for 0 <

|u|< r, where δ >0 is such thatM2δ <1.

Define Ω ={u∈ C|kuk < r} and take u ∈ Csuch that kuk = r, that is, u∈ ∂Ω. As before, it can be

shown thatT is completely continuous and|(T u)(t)| ≤M2δkuk, which, in view ofM2δ <1, yieldskT uk ≤ kuk,

u∈∂Ω. Therefore, by Theorem 3.2, the operatorT has at least one fixed point, which in turn implies that the problem (1.1) has at least one solution.

Theorem 3.5. Assume thatf : [0,1]×R→Ris a jointly continuous function satisfying

|f(t, u)−f(t, v)| ≤L|u−v|, ∀t∈[0,1], u, v∈R

with

L≤ Γq(α)Γq(α+ 1) 3Γq(α) + Γq(α+ 1).

(6)

Proof. Defining supt[0,1]|f(t,0)|=K <∞and selecting

r≥ K(3Γq(α) + Γq(α+ 1)) Γq(α)Γq(α+ 1) ,

we show thatT Br⊂Br, whereBr={u∈C:kuk ≤r}. Foru∈Br, we have

|(T u)(t)|

Z t

0

(t−qs)(α−1)

Γq(α) |f(s, u(s))|dqs+ 1 2

Z 1

0

(1−qs)(α−1)

Γq(α) |f(s, u(s))|dqs +|1−2t|

4

Z 1

0

(1−qs)(α−2)

Γq(α−1) |f(s, u(s))|dqs ≤

Z t

0

(t−qs)(α−1)

Γq(α) (|f(s, u(s))−f(s,0)|+|f(s,0)|)dqs+ 1 2

Z 1

0

(1−qs)(α−1)

Γq(α) (|f(s, u(s)) −f(s,0)|+|f(s,0)|)dqs+

|1−2t| 4

Z 1

0

(1−qs)(α−2)

Γq(α−1) (|f(s, u(s))−f(s,0)|+|f(s,0)|)dqs ≤ (Lr+K)

Z t

0

(t−qs)(α−1)

Γq(α) dqs+ 1 2

Z 1

0

(1−qs)(α−1)

Γq(α) dqs+

|1−2t| 4

Z 1

0

(1−qs)(α−2)

Γq(α−1) dqs

≤ (Lr+K)3Γq(α) + Γq(α+ 1) 2Γq(α)Γq(α+ 1)

≤r.

Taking the maximum over the interval [0,1], we getk(T u)(t)k ≤r. Now, foru, v ∈Cand for eacht∈[0,1],

we obtain

k(T u)(t)−(T v)(t)k

Z t

0

(t−qs)(α−1)

Γq(α) |f(s, u(s))−f(s, v(s))|dqs+ 1 2

Z 1

0

(1−qs)(α−1)

Γq(α) |f(s, u(s))−f(s, v(s))|dqs +|1−2t|

4

Z 1

0

(1−qs)(α−2)

Γq(α−1) |f(s, u(s))−f(s, v(s))|dqs ≤ Lku−vk

Z t

0

(t−qs)(α−1)

Γq(α)

dqs+ 1 2

Z 1

0

(1−qs)(α−1)

Γq(α)

dqs+

|1−2t| 4

Z 1

0

(1−qs)(α−2)

Γq(α−1)

dqs

≤ L(3Γq(α) + Γq(α+ 1)) 2Γq(α)Γq(α+ 1)

ku−vk= ΛL,αku−vk,

where

ΛL,α=

L(3Γq(α) + Γq(α+ 1)) 2Γq(α)Γq(α+ 1) ,

which depends only on the parameters involved in the problem. As ΛL,α <1, T is therefore a contraction. Thus, the conclusion of the theorem follows by the contraction mapping principle (the Banach fixed point theorem).

4

Some examples

Example 4.1. Consider the anti-periodic fractionalq-difference boundary value problem

 

(cDqαu)(t) =e

−cos2u(t)[5 + cos 2t+ 4 ln(5 + 2 sin2u(t))]

2 + sin2u(t) , t∈[0,1], 1< α≤2,

u(0) =−u(1), (Du)(0) =−(Du)(1).

(4.1)

(7)

Example 4.2. Consider the anti-periodic fractionalq-difference boundary value problem

(

(cDα

qu)(t) = (16 +u3(t))

1

2 + 2(t2+ 1)(tanu(t)−u(t))−4, t∈[0,1], 1< α≤2,

u(0) =−u(1), (Du)(0) =−(Du)(1). (4.2)

It can easily be verified that all the assumptions of Theorem 3.4 holds. Consequently, the conclusion of Theorem 3.4 implies that the problem (4.2) has at least one solution.

Example 4.3. Consider the anti-periodic fractionalq-difference boundary value problem

 

(cDαqu)(t) = e

−πt|u(t)|

(5 +e−πt)(1 +|u(t)|), t∈[0,1],

u(0) =−u(1), (Du)(0) =−(Du)(1),

(4.3)

where α= 1.5 andq= 0.5. Let

f(t, u) = e

−πt|u| (5 +e−πt)(1 +|u|). Clearly,L= 1/5 as|f(t, u)−f(t, v)| ≤1/5|u−v|. Further,

L(3Γq(α) + Γq(α+ 1)) Γq(α)Γq(α+ 1)

=3Γ0.5(1.5) + Γ0.5(2.5) 5Γ0.5(1.5)Γ0.5(2.5)

≈0.721135<1.

Thus, all the assumptions of Theorem 3.5 are satisfied. Therefore, the conclusion of Theorem 3.5 implies that the problem (4.3) has a unique solution.

References

[1] R.P. Agarwal, Certain fractional q-integrals andq-derivatives, Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc., 66 (1969), 365-370.

[2] B. Ahmad, Existence of solutions for fractional differential equations of orderq∈(2,3] with anti-periodic boundary conditions,J. Appl. Math. Comput.,34 (2010), 385-391.

[3] B. Ahmad, J.J. Nieto, Existence of solutions for anti-periodic boundary value problems involving fractional differential equations via Leray-Schauder degree theory,Topol. Methods Nonlinear Anal., 35 (2010), 295-304.

[4] B. Ahmad, J.J. Nieto, Anti-periodic fractional boundary value problems,Comput. Math. Appl.,62 (2011), 1150-1156.

[5] B. Ahmad, V. Otero-Espinar, Existence of solutions for fractional differential inclusions with anti-periodic boundary conditions,Bound. Value Probl.,2009 (2009), Art. ID 625347, 11 pages.

[6] B. Ahmad, S. Ntouyas, and I. Purnaras, Existence results for nonlocal boundary value problems of non-linear fractional q-difference equations,Adv. Difference Equ.,2012 (2012) 140, 26 pages.

[7] A. Alsaedi, Existence of solutions for integrodifferential equations of fractional order with antiperiodic boundary conditions,Int. J. Differ. Equ.,2009 (2009), Art. ID 417606, 9 pages.

[8] W.A. Al-Salam, Some fractionalq-integrals andq-derivatives,Proc. Edinb. Math. Soc.,15 (2) (1966-1967), 135-140.

[9] F.M. Atici, P.W. Eloe, Fractionalq-calculus on a time scale,J. Nonlinear Math. Phys.,14 (2007), 333-344. [10] Y. Chen, J.J. Nieto, D. O’Regan, Anti-periodic solutions for evolution equations associated with maximal

monotone mappings, Appl. Math. Lett.,24 (2011), 302-307.

(8)

[12] M. El-Shahed, F.M. Al-Askar, On the existence and uniqueness of solutions forq-fractional boundary value problem, Int. J. Math. Anal.,5 (2011), 1619-1630.

[13] M. El-Shahed, H.A. Hassan, Positive solutions of q-difference equation, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 138 (2010), 1733-1738.

[14] R.A.C. Ferreira, Nontrivial solutions for fractionalq-difference boundary value problems,Electron. J. Qual. Theory Differ. Equ., 70 (2010), 1-10.

[15] R.A.C. Ferreira, Positive solutions for a class of boundary value problems with fractional q-differences,

Comput. Math. Appl.,61 (2011), 367-373.

[16] J.R. Graef, L. Kong, Positive solutions for a class of higher order boundary value problems with fractional

q-derivatives,Appl. Math. Comput.,218 (2012), 9682-9689.

[17] F.H. Jackson, On qfunctions and a certain difference operator, Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh, 46 (1908), 253-281.

[18] F.H. Jackson, Onq-definite integrals,Quart. J. Pure Appl. Math.,41 (1910), 193-203. [19] V. Kac and P. Cheung, Quantum Calculus, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2002.

[20] S. Liang, J. Zhang, Existence and uniqueness of positive solutions for three-point boundary value problem with fractionalq-differences,J. Appl. Math. Comput.,40 (2012), 277-288.

[21] J. Ma and J. Yang, Existence of solutions for multi-point boundary value problem of fractionalq-difference equation, Electron. J. Qual. Theory Differ. Equ.,92 (2011), 1-10.

[22] P.M. Rajkovi´c, S.D. Marinkovi´c, and M.S. Stankovi´c, On q-analogues of caputo derivative and Mittag-Leffler function,Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal.,10 (2007), 359-373.

[23] P.M. Rajkovi´c, S.D. Marinkovi´c, and M.S. Stankovi´c, Fractional integrals and derivatives inq-calculus,

Appl. Anal. Discrete Math.,1 (2007), 311-323.

[24] M.S. Stankovi´c, P.M. Rajkovi´c, and S.D. Marinkovi´c, Onq-fractional derivatives of Riemann-Liouville and Caputo type, 2009, http://arxiv.org/abs/0909.0387.

[25] D.R. Smart, Fixed Point Theorems, Cambridge University Press, 1980.

[26] W. Yang, Positive solutions for boundary value problems involving nonlinear fractionalq-difference equa-tions,Differ. Equ. Appl., 5 (2013), 205-219.

[27] Y. Zhao, H. Chen, Q. Zhang, Existence results for fractionalq-difference equations with nonlocalq-integral boundary conditions,Adv. Difference Equ.,2013 (2013) 48, 15 pages.

[28] Y. Zhao, H. Chen, Q. Zhang, Existence and multiplicity of positive solutions for nonhomogeneous boundary value problems with fractionalq-derivative,Bound. Value Probl.,2013 (2013) 103, 15 pages.

[29] Y. Zhao, G. Ye, H. Chen, Multiple positive solutions of a singular semipositone integral boundary value problem for fractionalq-derivatives equation,Abstr. Appl. Anal.,2013 (2013), Art. ID 643571, 12 pages.

Received: June 13, 2013;Accepted: July 30, 2013

References

Related documents

The Hadrami role, a house siby (a house male-servant), may not be an actual vocation for the majority o f Hadar Hadramis, but it is contextually performed in

The moisture management capabilities of the insulation samples were explored and equivalent thermal conductivity values were determined from heat flux, temperature

1 Weblogs or just &#34;blogs&#34; are a diary-style form of writing where people write blogs about seeing a recent event, their views on a particular subject, or more typically,

The experiment results by using two palm print databases determine that the proposed method of class specific information with 2D-PCA, alternate 2DPCA, Kernel PCA and

stones were considered causally related to hvpcr- calciuria, whereas iii 14 children no etiologic as- sociations could be found. Cheniical analysis of calculi, which was performed in

For example a much lower count rate was ob- tained with the neutron method for a given water content in the Hanford very fine sandy loam than in the other soils.. This difference

Table 2 illustrates the average score of participants in different aspects of the ability to take medical history, showing that the aspect with the highest point was

It was shown that there is relation between iterated kernel and resolvent kernel as mentioned to some examples of these kernel .,also find the solution of