• No results found

God of Gita is Shiva and not Krishna

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "God of Gita is Shiva and not Krishna"

Copied!
44
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

WHEN, WHERE, WHO AND HOW GITA WAS SERMONIZED AND TO WHOM? WHEN, WHERE, WHO AND HOW GITA WAS SERMONIZED AND TO WHOM?

Actually God of gita is actually not the number one divine physical personality Actually God of gita is actually not the number one divine physical personality (= human deity) Sri Krishna. It is the incorporeal, most beloved Supreme God fat (= human deity) Sri Krishna. It is the incorporeal, most beloved Supreme God fat her of all souls who is also known as Shiv. Efforts are put to explain this. Eve her of all souls who is also known as Shiv. Efforts are put to explain this. Eve n the following are explained.

n the following are explained. a)Lowkik

a)Lowkik sanscrit sanscrit gita gita does does not not have have enough truthenough truth

b)Teachings of (God through) BKWSU resembles closest to even lowkik gita. b)Teachings of (God through) BKWSU resembles closest to even lowkik gita. c)and hence the True/real gita is the teachings of (God through) BKWSU. c)and hence the True/real gita is the teachings of (God through) BKWSU. Some initial questions

Some initial questions

1)It is said that gita was sermonized at the end of Dwapur Yug/Age by Sri Krishn 1)It is said that gita was sermonized at the end of Dwapur Yug/Age by Sri Krishn a. If so- why after Gita episode the worst Kaliyug came? Dharma/religiousness in a. If so- why after Gita episode the worst Kaliyug came? Dharma/religiousness in Kaliyug is lesser than in Dwapur Yug. If Sri Krishna did establishment of dharm Kaliyug is lesser than in Dwapur Yug. If Sri Krishna did establishment of dharm a, how can Kaliyug come next to Dwapur Yug? The best Satyug should have come, is a, how can Kaliyug come next to Dwapur Yug? The best Satyug should have come, is

it not? it not?

Some say- “It is law of time. According to kalachakra (Time cycle), Kaliyug should Some say- “It is law of time. According to kalachakra (Time cycle), Kaliyug should come after Dwapur yug”. If so, then what is the significance of incarnation of Go come after Dwapur yug”. If so, then what is the significance of incarnation of Go d? Is his(God’s!) effort/incarnation waste?

d? Is his(God’s!) effort/incarnation waste?

Some say- Sri Krishna came to reduce burden(population) on earth. If so- then wh Some say- Sri Krishna came to reduce burden(population) on earth. If so- then wh at is need of preaching gita? God could have created natural calamities to reduc at is need of preaching gita? God could have created natural calamities to reduc e population. Or it would be enough if people fought with each other. Is there n e population. Or it would be enough if people fought with each other. Is there n eed of God to make people fight with each other? Or is the God’s work is to make p eed of God to make people fight with each other? Or is the God’s work is to make p eople fight with each other? It defames God, is it not?

eople fight with each other? It defames God, is it not?

There is no need to come and teach religious matter to create a war. People figh There is no need to come and teach religious matter to create a war. People figh t among themselves. God need not preach dharma to make people fight. In fact, re t among themselves. God need not preach dharma to make people fight. In fact, re ligious matters are to be taught to follow non violence.

ligious matters are to be taught to follow non violence.

Another thing- If Sri Krishna’s purpose was to reduce population, why did he crea Another thing- If Sri Krishna’s purpose was to reduce population, why did he crea te millions of children from his 16108 queens/wives? [In Bhaagavat it is written te millions of children from his 16108 queens/wives? [In Bhaagavat it is written

crores of braahmins were appointed for education of Sri Krishna’s children create crores of braahmins were appointed for education of Sri Krishna’s children create d by his 16108 wives]

d by his 16108 wives]

2)It is written in gita- sarvadharman parityajya maamekum sharanam vraja, ahum t 2)It is written in gita- sarvadharman parityajya maamekum sharanam vraja, ahum t waa sarva paapebhyO, mokshayishyaami maa shuchaha – (18-66) = Sacrifice all the re waa sarva paapebhyO, mokshayishyaami maa shuchaha – (18-66) = Sacrifice all the re ligions and surrender to me. I will liberate you from all your sins.

ligions and surrender to me. I will liberate you from all your sins.

Now- what all are the religions to be sacrificed? What all are the religions tha Now- what all are the religions to be sacrificed? What all are the religions tha t did exist in Dwapur Yug? If all the religions are to be sacrificed, what is th t did exist in Dwapur Yug? If all the religions are to be sacrificed, what is th e meaning of establishing dharma/religion? (Because it clearly said in gita- I h e meaning of establishing dharma/religion? (Because it clearly said in gita- I h ave come to establish religion).

ave come to establish religion).

What are dharma, swadharma, saddharma, paradharma, adharma? What are dharma, swadharma, saddharma, paradharma, adharma?

3) It is written in gita- “Sacrifice all the religions and surrender to me. I will 3) It is written in gita- “Sacrifice all the religions and surrender to me. I will

liberate you from all your sins”- (18-66). liberate you from all your sins”- (18-66).

Now- What all are the sins committed by Arjun? From this it implies that gita kn Now- What all are the sins committed by Arjun? From this it implies that gita kn owledge is for those who commit sins. Was Arjun the highest sinner? Also- was gi owledge is for those who commit sins. Was Arjun the highest sinner? Also- was gi ta preached/needed for just one person? Was he alone sinner in the world?

ta preached/needed for just one person? Was he alone sinner in the world?

Ok- let us agree that “god spoke just to one person, but it is applicable to all”. I Ok- let us agree that “god spoke just to one person, but it is applicable to all”. I n that case, what is the procedure to become free from sins? When did Arjun prac n that case, what is the procedure to become free from sins? When did Arjun prac tice yoga to purify himself? Will physical war (violence) increase sins or reduc tice yoga to purify himself? Will physical war (violence) increase sins or reduc e? Does it mean to surrender to God one should do physical war? If so- then what e? Does it mean to surrender to God one should do physical war? If so- then what about others who also attended war, but did not listen to Gita? Can we say- eve about others who also attended war, but did not listen to Gita? Can we say- eve

(2)

n they also surrendered to God? n they also surrendered to God?

Were those sins due to just of that one birth of Arjun or is it the total accumu Were those sins due to just of that one birth of Arjun or is it the total accumu lated sins

lated sins including his including his previous births? previous births? In which In which birth did birth did he commit he commit most sinmost sin s?

s? Should we Should we consider all consider all (or at (or at least higher percentage) least higher percentage) of his of his actions till actions till hh e listened to gita were wrong/sin?Why in Mahabharat these things are not mention e listened to gita were wrong/sin?Why in Mahabharat these things are not mention ed or discussed?

ed or discussed?

Gita says Arjun was highest sinner in the following shloka. Do Gita people belie Gita says Arjun was highest sinner in the following shloka. Do Gita people belie ve so? Can they explain this? So- does not this imply that the life of Arjun til ve so? Can they explain this? So- does not this imply that the life of Arjun til l listening of Gita was bad and waste?

l listening of Gita was bad and waste?

Api chedasi paapebhyaha, sarvebhyaha paapakruttamaha, sarvam jnaanaplavenaivavru Api chedasi paapebhyaha, sarvebhyaha paapakruttamaha, sarvam jnaanaplavenaivavru jinam santharishyasi – (4-36)

jinam santharishyasi – (4-36)

= Even though you are more sinner than all the sinners, with the help of boat of = Even though you are more sinner than all the sinners, with the help of boat of

knowledge you will cross the whole ocean of sin successfully. knowledge you will cross the whole ocean of sin successfully.

4)It is said- AHIMSHAA PARAMODHARMA (= NON VIOLENCE IS THE HIGHEST RELIGION). Th 4)It is said- AHIMSHAA PARAMODHARMA (= NON VIOLENCE IS THE HIGHEST RELIGION). Th en how can god of gita whose duty is to establish dharma can teach/direct to do en how can god of gita whose duty is to establish dharma can teach/direct to do physical war on others? Because for a yogi, peaceful atmosphere and mind is nece physical war on others? Because for a yogi, peaceful atmosphere and mind is nece ssary. Can establishment of dharma be achieved by physical war? If for a kshatri ssary. Can establishment of dharma be achieved by physical war? If for a kshatri y physical war is his duty, is knowledge of gita applicable to kshatriya categor y physical war is his duty, is knowledge of gita applicable to kshatriya categor y only? In that case, authority of gita should have been more in the hands of ka y only? In that case, authority of gita should have been more in the hands of ka shatriyaas than braahmins, is it not?

shatriyaas than braahmins, is it not?

[but today braahmins read/preach it more than anybody else!]. Also- is war fiel [but today braahmins read/preach it more than anybody else!]. Also- is war fiel d right place to give education? If yes, then it clearly implies that it is only d right place to give education? If yes, then it clearly implies that it is only for kshatriyaas. Other varnas need not study gita knowledge, is it not? Also ks for kshatriyaas. Other varnas need not study gita knowledge, is it not? Also ks hatrya varna/sect should have been given the highest place.

hatrya varna/sect should have been given the highest place.

But there is saying - “BRAAHMANO DEVATAYA NAAMAH”= SALUTES TO BRAAHMINS WHO BECOME D But there is saying - “BRAAHMANO DEVATAYA NAAMAH”= SALUTES TO BRAAHMINS WHO BECOME D EITIES OR SALUTES TO BRAAHMINS AND DEITIES. But in the varnas, kshatriya is give EITIES OR SALUTES TO BRAAHMINS AND DEITIES. But in the varnas, kshatriya is give n next place to braahmins and deities. Why?

n next place to braahmins and deities. Why?

5)It is said- Arjun got attachment with his relatives at war field. And that was 5)It is said- Arjun got attachment with his relatives at war field. And that was the main concern. Now- just think- How many such incidents had occurred BEFORE the main concern. Now- just think- How many such incidents had occurred BEFORE in history?

in history?

It is shown no such incident (attachment with relatives and relatives as enemie It is shown no such incident (attachment with relatives and relatives as enemie s) had occurred before. If no such incident had occurred before, then what is th s) had occurred before. If no such incident had occurred before, then what is th e significance/use of previous incarnations? If nature of climax is different in e significance/use of previous incarnations? If nature of climax is different in different times/ages and God plays his role according to that situation, then i different times/ages and God plays his role according to that situation, then i t implies gita is useless after Mahabharat war. Its praise should end after Dwap t implies gita is useless after Mahabharat war. Its praise should end after Dwap ur Age, is it not?

ur Age, is it not?

If it is useful till the end of Kaliyug, it (can) also imply that it was If it is useful till the end of Kaliyug, it (can) also imply that it was necessary even in other ages. Then why gita was preached only in 8th incarnatio necessary even in other ages. Then why gita was preached only in 8th incarnatio n? Also- people say Vedas are great scriptures and existed from anaadi (the very n? Also- people say Vedas are great scriptures and existed from anaadi (the very beginning itself). In that case, why world got degraded? Some say Vedas are mor beginning itself). In that case, why world got degraded? Some say Vedas are mor e important than Gita. In that case, why Vedas could not protect India/Bharat an e important than Gita. In that case, why Vedas could not protect India/Bharat an d/or dharma and there came necessity of Gita?

d/or dharma and there came necessity of Gita?

Also when it is said- SARVASHAASTYRAMAYI SHIRIMANI GITA= GITA IS PARENT/SUPERIOR Also when it is said- SARVASHAASTYRAMAYI SHIRIMANI GITA= GITA IS PARENT/SUPERIOR TO ALL OTHER SCRIPTURES, and RELIGION IS MIGHT, -why could not India protect it TO ALL OTHER SCRIPTURES, and RELIGION IS MIGHT, -why could not India protect it self from attack of other religions? How can it be said- Vedas are greater than self from attack of other religions? How can it be said- Vedas are greater than gita?

gita?

6)Does knowledge of gita say to fight against one’s own brothers? Or does it say t 6)Does knowledge of gita say to fight against one’s own brothers? Or does it say t he maximum possibility of fight will be always with one’s own brothers!? That he maximum possibility of fight will be always with one’s own brothers!? That is-if somebody becomes my enemy, the highest probability is that- they would be my if somebody becomes my enemy, the highest probability is that- they would be my own brothers only? Or is knowledge of gita applicable to only such a few cases w own brothers only? Or is knowledge of gita applicable to only such a few cases w

(3)

here one gets attachment with his cheating brothers? here one gets attachment with his cheating brothers?

There is no any incident mentioned in scriptures about Kouravas troubling or tor There is no any incident mentioned in scriptures about Kouravas troubling or tor turing the citizens of the country. The kouravas had enmity or hatredness just o turing the citizens of the country. The kouravas had enmity or hatredness just o ver their brothers, pandavas. Then how can that situation be called as climax (d ver their brothers, pandavas. Then how can that situation be called as climax (d harmaglaani)? If kouravas did injustice just to pandavas, is it correct to destr harmaglaani)? If kouravas did injustice just to pandavas, is it correct to destr oy all the people?

oy all the people?

In case, if all the people of the country were irreligious, is it correct just t In case, if all the people of the country were irreligious, is it correct just t o kill just male category? Were all the women religious? In the war, fight was s o kill just male category? Were all the women religious? In the war, fight was s hown just among the male category. Can we say- Gita is scripture just for males hown just among the male category. Can we say- Gita is scripture just for males only?

only?

7)God is incorporeal (bodyless). Sri Krishna is corporeal (physical personality) 7)God is incorporeal (bodyless). Sri Krishna is corporeal (physical personality) . Then how can Sri Krishna be God? God is neither male nor female. But Sri Krish . Then how can Sri Krishna be God? God is neither male nor female. But Sri Krish na is male. In gita, it is written BHAGAVAANUVAACH. BHAGAVAANUVAACH means versio na is male. In gita, it is written BHAGAVAANUVAACH. BHAGAVAANUVAACH means versio ns/words of BHAGAVAAN(GOD). When Sri Krishna has no real eligibility to be calle ns/words of BHAGAVAAN(GOD). When Sri Krishna has no real eligibility to be calle d as Bhagavaan, how can he be God of gita?

d as Bhagavaan, how can he be God of gita?

8)If Sri Krishna , Sri Rama, etc all are avatars God, then even words of Sri Ram 8)If Sri Krishna , Sri Rama, etc all are avatars God, then even words of Sri Ram a should have been as famous as BHAGAVAANUVAACH. There should have been another a should have been as famous as BHAGAVAANUVAACH. There should have been another scripture which consists of Bhagavaanuvaach (versions/words) of Ram. But why wor scripture which consists of Bhagavaanuvaach (versions/words) of Ram. But why wor ds of Ram are not called as Bhagavaanuvaach? Why not even words of Sri Krishna d ds of Ram are not called as Bhagavaanuvaach? Why not even words of Sri Krishna d uring other incidents are not as famous as Bhagavaanuvaach? [The third avatar is uring other incidents are not as famous as Bhagavaanuvaach? [The third avatar is

shown as pig’s. So- can even the cry of that pig be called as Bhagavaanuvaach? – ju shown as pig’s. So- can even the cry of that pig be called as Bhagavaanuvaach? – ju st a joke].

st a joke].

9)Just see- In India, the oldest temples are Shiv temples. Glory of Shiv temples 9)Just see- In India, the oldest temples are Shiv temples. Glory of Shiv temples is much more than other temples. Even in count, the number of Shiv temples is h is much more than other temples. Even in count, the number of Shiv temples is h ighest. Shiv temples can be seen even in hills as well as village/town/cities. P ighest. Shiv temples can be seen even in hills as well as village/town/cities. P eople take

eople take very high very high risk and risk and effort in effort in visiting visiting Shiv temples Shiv temples (Eg- Amarnath) (Eg- Amarnath) thth an other temples.

an other temples.

All these imply Shiv is higher than Sri Krishna or any other deity. Even in Maha All these imply Shiv is higher than Sri Krishna or any other deity. Even in Maha bharat, it is said- Sri Krishna did tapasya of Shiv and obtained the highest wea bharat, it is said- Sri Krishna did tapasya of Shiv and obtained the highest wea pon SUDARSHAN CHAKRA from him. There is no mention of god Shiv worshipping anyon pon SUDARSHAN CHAKRA from him. There is no mention of god Shiv worshipping anyon e. When Shiv is definitely greater than Sri Krishna, his scripture(biography) sh e. When Shiv is definitely greater than Sri Krishna, his scripture(biography) sh ould be greater than that of Sri Krishna, is it not? Since gita is the highest s ould be greater than that of Sri Krishna, is it not? Since gita is the highest s cripture (sarvashaastramayi shiromani = mother of all the scriptures), Shiv only cripture (sarvashaastramayi shiromani = mother of all the scriptures), Shiv only

can be its sermonizer, is it not? can be its sermonizer, is it not?

10) It is written in gita- “Sacrifice all the religions and surrender to me. I wil 10) It is written in gita- “Sacrifice all the religions and surrender to me. I wil l liberate you from all your sins”- (18-66).

l liberate you from all your sins”- (18-66).

Sri Krishna belongs to a particular religion (Yaadav kul). So how can he say –sacr Sri Krishna belongs to a particular religion (Yaadav kul). So how can he say –sacr ifice all the religions? Is it ever said yaadav kul is greatest among all the re ifice all the religions? Is it ever said yaadav kul is greatest among all the re ligions or varnas? It is said- “braahmano devataya naamah”. Braahmins and deities ar ligions or varnas? It is said- “braahmano devataya naamah”. Braahmins and deities ar e considered to be highest among the different varnas/sects.

e considered to be highest among the different varnas/sects.

No person from Sri Krishna’s religion (Yaadavas) is famous or worshipped (except v No person from Sri Krishna’s religion (Yaadavas) is famous or worshipped (except v ery few like Balaram (that too to some extent, not much)who is considered to be ery few like Balaram (that too to some extent, not much)who is considered to be his blood relative (own brother). If Sri Krishna’s religion is the best, yaadavaas his blood relative (own brother). If Sri Krishna’s religion is the best, yaadavaas

should have been the best, is it not? But in fact, yaadavaas are shown as highl should have been the best, is it not? But in fact, yaadavaas are shown as highl y egoist, low character people in scriptures. Then what is the religion of Sri K y egoist, low character people in scriptures. Then what is the religion of Sri K rishna?

rishna?

If you say- Sri Krishna is above religion matters, then what about his body? He If you say- Sri Krishna is above religion matters, then what about his body? He has his own body. He has parents! He got body from them. So definitely he is bou has his own body. He has parents! He got body from them. So definitely he is bou nd by the religion of his parents, is it not?

nd by the religion of his parents, is it not?

Still even if we take it for granted that Sri Krishna is above all the religions Still even if we take it for granted that Sri Krishna is above all the religions , he got body just to discharge his duties, then it implies one should not remem , he got body just to discharge his duties, then it implies one should not remem

(4)

ber or worship physical body of Sri Krishna during meditation (yoga= dhyaana), i ber or worship physical body of Sri Krishna during meditation (yoga= dhyaana), i s it not? But people remember physical body of Sri Krishna during meditation. s it not? But people remember physical body of Sri Krishna during meditation. It is clearly mentioned in gita to sacrifice body consciousness. If we remember It is clearly mentioned in gita to sacrifice body consciousness. If we remember a bodily personality, can we become free from body conscious?

a bodily personality, can we become free from body conscious?

In gita, it is said- “REMEMBER ME(GOD) ALWAYS IN EVERY ACTION”. Sri Krishna is shown In gita, it is said- “REMEMBER ME(GOD) ALWAYS IN EVERY ACTION”. Sri Krishna is shown

as died just from an arrow of hunter. So body of Sri Krishna really perished. S as died just from an arrow of hunter. So body of Sri Krishna really perished. S o how can God’s real form be that of Sri Krishna? GOD IS CALLED AS TRUTH/ETERNAL. o how can God’s real form be that of Sri Krishna? GOD IS CALLED AS TRUTH/ETERNAL. So his form can never change, is it not? When the body is perishable, why to rem So his form can never change, is it not? When the body is perishable, why to rem ember perishable things?

ember perishable things?

Many people say- God has no name and form. Then what is the importance of name a Many people say- God has no name and form. Then what is the importance of name a nd form of Sri Krishna? Why do they direct to chant name of Sri Krishna and wors nd form of Sri Krishna? Why do they direct to chant name of Sri Krishna and wors hip his physical personality/form?

hip his physical personality/form?

11)Was Sri Krishna bound by laws of karma?:- Some say- yes, he was; because he w 11)Was Sri Krishna bound by laws of karma?:- Some say- yes, he was; because he w as in human form. It was shown that he died by a hunter’s arrow. Now- did he exper as in human form. It was shown that he died by a hunter’s arrow. Now- did he exper ience pain while dying? Most probably devotees of Krishna will not believe so. T ience pain while dying? Most probably devotees of Krishna will not believe so. T hen how can they say he was bound by laws of karma? Also- it was shown that he d hen how can they say he was bound by laws of karma? Also- it was shown that he d id many miracles. So, it looks as if he was bound by laws of karma.

id many miracles. So, it looks as if he was bound by laws of karma.

If he was not bound by law of karma, what teachings do we get from his biography If he was not bound by law of karma, what teachings do we get from his biography ? [killing many irreligious people and doing miracles]. So what is our duty? Sho ? [killing many irreligious people and doing miracles]. So what is our duty? Sho uld we also begin to kill such people and try to do miracles? Can we achieve to uld we also begin to kill such people and try to do miracles? Can we achieve to do miracles? I think all will agree that we human beings will not be able to do do miracles? I think all will agree that we human beings will not be able to do such miracles- let he or she be 100% devotee of Sri Krishna.

such miracles- let he or she be 100% devotee of Sri Krishna.

So it implies that Sri Krishna or God himself comes to kill bad people and rescu So it implies that Sri Krishna or God himself comes to kill bad people and rescu e good people, then it implies that there is no need to teach anything for the g e good people, then it implies that there is no need to teach anything for the g ood people, is it not? In that case, what is the need of preaching gita? If foll ood people, is it not? In that case, what is the need of preaching gita? If foll owing gita teachings uplifts us automatically, then what is the need of killing owing gita teachings uplifts us automatically, then what is the need of killing so many people? If it does not uplift us and there is still need of God and war so many people? If it does not uplift us and there is still need of God and war to kill such people, then what is the use of gita?

to kill such people, then what is the use of gita?

Can following teachings of Gita we will be able to get such weapons and to do mi Can following teachings of Gita we will be able to get such weapons and to do mi racles?

racles?

We study biography of great people either to follow them or implement their rese We study biography of great people either to follow them or implement their rese arch activities (what they gave to society). For example we study biography of M arch activities (what they gave to society). For example we study biography of M ahatma Gandhi to adopt at least some of the values he had in his life. We study ahatma Gandhi to adopt at least some of the values he had in his life. We study biography of Isaac Newton to bring his inventions to practical so that it can ma biography of Isaac Newton to bring his inventions to practical so that it can ma ke life better.

ke life better.

Now- see the biographies of personalities of heroes in the scriptures. Sri Krish Now- see the biographies of personalities of heroes in the scriptures. Sri Krish na did miracles. There were brahmaastras, varunaastras, paashupataastras, etc. J na did miracles. There were brahmaastras, varunaastras, paashupataastras, etc. J ust by chanting some mantra a grass would become some great astra! Bhim (= one o ust by chanting some mantra a grass would become some great astra! Bhim (= one o f the pandavas) had power of 1000 elephants, etc, etc.

f the pandavas) had power of 1000 elephants, etc, etc.

Now- by studying such stories are we going to get such powers? What is the teach Now- by studying such stories are we going to get such powers? What is the teach ing they give us? Are their teachings and actions (miracles and extra ordinary p ing they give us? Are their teachings and actions (miracles and extra ordinary p ower) similar to one another? It is said- one’s words should be according to his a ower) similar to one another? It is said- one’s words should be according to his a ctions. But there is no coincidence in their teachings and actions. Then what be ctions. But there is no coincidence in their teachings and actions. Then what be nefit we will get from them? [Of course we can enjoy it like a movie or novels] nefit we will get from them? [Of course we can enjoy it like a movie or novels] 12)Is Gita scripture of just Hindu religion? If yes, why not the word Hindu men 12)Is Gita scripture of just Hindu religion? If yes, why not the word Hindu men tioned in gita?

tioned in gita?

If gita is applicable to all the religions, in which category other religions (E If gita is applicable to all the religions, in which category other religions (E g:- Muslim, Christian, etc) should be placed among different varnas (braahmin, k g:- Muslim, Christian, etc) should be placed among different varnas (braahmin, k

(5)

shatriy, vaishy, shudr)? Also how can the other religions be convinced that gita shatriy, vaishy, shudr)? Also how can the other religions be convinced that gita is applicable even to them? Because all the religions believe GOD IS INCORPOREA is applicable even to them? Because all the religions believe GOD IS INCORPOREA L/BODYLESS. They do not believe corporeal Sri Krishna as God.

L/BODYLESS. They do not believe corporeal Sri Krishna as God.

Some say Hindu is not a religion, but it is way of living. But even then why the Some say Hindu is not a religion, but it is way of living. But even then why the re is no

re is no name of Hindu name of Hindu is gita? is gita? So- does it mean So- does it mean gita has no gita has no value for Hinduismvalue for Hinduism ?

?

13)In gita, it is said- “Paritraanaaya saadhunam (4: 08) = I come to protect saadh 13)In gita, it is said- “Paritraanaaya saadhunam (4: 08) = I come to protect saadh us”. Now who are Sadhus? Meaning of sadhu is ONE WHO DOES SAADHNAA (EFFORT). Then us”. Now who are Sadhus? Meaning of sadhu is ONE WHO DOES SAADHNAA (EFFORT). Then how can today’s saadhu/saints who put effort to reach/realize God help us? Does no how can today’s saadhu/saints who put effort to reach/realize God help us? Does no t that imply these saadhus are also ignorant, weak and sinners?

t that imply these saadhus are also ignorant, weak and sinners?

Some people believe Sadhu means one who is pure and honest. In that case, why do Some people believe Sadhu means one who is pure and honest. In that case, why do they need protection of god? Why should god of gita say- I come to protect Sadh they need protection of god? Why should god of gita say- I come to protect Sadh us. [BECAUSE GOD’S PROTECTION IS NECESSARY ONLY FOR IMPURE/WEAK PEOPLE, IS IT NOT? us. [BECAUSE GOD’S PROTECTION IS NECESSARY ONLY FOR IMPURE/WEAK PEOPLE, IS IT NOT?

DOCTOR IS NECESSARY FOR PATIENTS AND NOT FOR HEALTHY PEOPLE]. God is most neede DOCTOR IS NECESSARY FOR PATIENTS AND NOT FOR HEALTHY PEOPLE]. God is most neede d for impure people, is it not?

d for impure people, is it not?

There have been countless number of Sadhus/saints in India. (There were many goo There have been countless number of Sadhus/saints in India. (There were many goo d saints also). Still why India lost its independence? How come other religion/c d saints also). Still why India lost its independence? How come other religion/c ountries got capacity to loot India’s health and wealth? That too they looted even ountries got capacity to loot India’s health and wealth? That too they looted even

from temples! from temples!

Many Sadhus who read, preach and teach gita say sadhus are already protected. So Many Sadhus who read, preach and teach gita say sadhus are already protected. So - how come the above word in gita? Also- if they are protected, then why do they - how come the above word in gita? Also- if they are protected, then why do they

do saadhnaa(effort)? do saadhnaa(effort)?

14) Scriptures say, “Now it is just beginning of Kaliyug. The life of Kaliyug is 4 14) Scriptures say, “Now it is just beginning of Kaliyug. The life of Kaliyug is 4 ,32,000 years. Just about 5000 years of Kaliyug is crossed/passed”. That is, accor ,32,000 years. Just about 5000 years of Kaliyug is crossed/passed”. That is, accor ding to them Sri Vishnu incarnated as Sri Krishna 5000 yrs before from present a ding to them Sri Vishnu incarnated as Sri Krishna 5000 yrs before from present a nd preached gita. It was eight avatar according to them. It is also said that th nd preached gita. It was eight avatar according to them. It is also said that th e ninth avatar was that of Buddha. It is well known from the history that Buddha’s e ninth avatar was that of Buddha. It is well known from the history that Buddha’s

time was around 2250 yrs before. So did dharma established by Sri Krishna got d time was around 2250 yrs before. So did dharma established by Sri Krishna got d egraded just in 2750 (5000 – 2250) years and God had to incarnate as Buddha? Ok, l egraded just in 2750 (5000 – 2250) years and God had to incarnate as Buddha? Ok, l et us agree.

et us agree.

Even then- according to them Kaliyug will exist for 427,000 years (=432000 – 5000) Even then- according to them Kaliyug will exist for 427,000 years (=432000 – 5000)

from today/present. Scriptures believe God will incarnate as KALKI at the end o from today/present. Scriptures believe God will incarnate as KALKI at the end o f Kaliyug. Now the question here is- did dharma created by eighth avatar Sri Kri f Kaliyug. Now the question here is- did dharma created by eighth avatar Sri Kri shna got degraded in just 2750 years and that created by Buddha will sustain for shna got degraded in just 2750 years and that created by Buddha will sustain for

427000 years? 427000 years?

Ok, let us agree even this. Ok, let us agree even this.

In that case, is avtar of Buddha more powerful than Sri Krishna! If yes, do/will In that case, is avtar of Buddha more powerful than Sri Krishna! If yes, do/will gita followers suggest worshiping/praising Buddha more than Sri Krishna? Not on gita followers suggest worshiping/praising Buddha more than Sri Krishna? Not on ly that- If Buddha was ninth avatar according to Hinduism, then how come Buddhis ly that- If Buddha was ninth avatar according to Hinduism, then how come Buddhis m got named as separate religion and has separate scripture? Hindus worship Rama m got named as separate religion and has separate scripture? Hindus worship Rama , Krishna, etc. But why not even Buddha? If Buddha was ninth avatar according to , Krishna, etc. But why not even Buddha? If Buddha was ninth avatar according to

Hinduism, then from the period of Buddha, did gita lost its value? Hinduism, then from the period of Buddha, did gita lost its value?

15)It is written in Mahabharat that Sri Krishna married Jambavati = daughter of 15)It is written in Mahabharat that Sri Krishna married Jambavati = daughter of Jambavant. Jambavant is shown in Silver Age during period of Sri Rama. Sri Krish Jambavant. Jambavant is shown in Silver Age during period of Sri Rama. Sri Krish na is shown at the end of Dwapur Age. Now the question arises- what is the life na is shown at the end of Dwapur Age. Now the question arises- what is the life span of Jambavant’s daughter? Can she live for one full age (from end of Silver Ag span of Jambavant’s daughter? Can she live for one full age (from end of Silver Ag e to end of Dwapur Age)? Did she remain virgin for the whole age and then marrie e to end of Dwapur Age)? Did she remain virgin for the whole age and then marrie d to Sri Krishna at the end of Dwapur age?

d to Sri Krishna at the end of Dwapur age?

Ok, let us agree so. Even then was she young lady while marrying? If yes, then w Ok, let us agree so. Even then was she young lady while marrying? If yes, then w hat is the period of her marriage life? Because Sri Krishna was shown as died or hat is the period of her marriage life? Because Sri Krishna was shown as died or

(6)

departed from the world soon. How did Jambavati die? What about history of othe departed from the world soon. How did Jambavati die? What about history of othe r queens of Sri Krishna? Did they die before him? Or did they get title widows? r queens of Sri Krishna? Did they die before him? Or did they get title widows?

Is this not ridiculous? Is this not ridiculous?

16)When it is said- “sambhavaami yuge2 = I come in every age”. there should be just 16)When it is said- “sambhavaami yuge2 = I come in every age”. there should be just four avtaars(incarnations)- one for each age, is it not? How come ten incarnatio four avtaars(incarnations)- one for each age, is it not? How come ten incarnatio ns?

ns?

17)It is said Vyyaas Bhagavaan. But in Mahabharat, it is shown that Vyas failed 17)It is said Vyyaas Bhagavaan. But in Mahabharat, it is shown that Vyas failed in an incident but his son succeeded and his son is given higher place than Vyaa in an incident but his son succeeded and his son is given higher place than Vyaa s. Then how can he be called as Bhagavaan?

s. Then how can he be called as Bhagavaan?

18)Some say- “The 16108 ladies were those who had been under bondage of Narakaasur 18)Some say- “The 16108 ladies were those who had been under bondage of Narakaasur

(a demon). He was killed and then they got released. But no one was ready to ma (a demon). He was killed and then they got released. But no one was ready to ma rry them. So Krishna married them”. But in Ramayan, it is shown that Sri Ram sent rry them. So Krishna married them”. But in Ramayan, it is shown that Sri Ram sent his wife Sita to forest (that too- after passing in the fire test (agni pareeksh his wife Sita to forest (that too- after passing in the fire test (agni pareeksh a)] just by a comment/criticism of a dobhi. They say Ram did so to respect kul m a)] just by a comment/criticism of a dobhi. They say Ram did so to respect kul m aryaadaa of the citizens and respect the society.

aryaadaa of the citizens and respect the society.

Just see- So how can Krishna accept even those ladies who were not really belong Just see- So how can Krishna accept even those ladies who were not really belong ing to him, but Ram rejecting his own innocent wife that too after passing the t ing to him, but Ram rejecting his own innocent wife that too after passing the t est?

est?

So- whom, should we follow- Krishna or Ram? Can such a Ram be called as Maryaada So- whom, should we follow- Krishna or Ram? Can such a Ram be called as Maryaada a purushottam? Because while marrying the husband takes oath that he will take c a purushottam? Because while marrying the husband takes oath that he will take c are of his wife in righteous way/dharma. Now was Ram’s acts towards his wife were are of his wife in righteous way/dharma. Now was Ram’s acts towards his wife were according to dharma?

according to dharma?

Ok- let us agree that Ram’s action was as according to dharma. Then do we need suc Ok- let us agree that Ram’s action was as according to dharma. Then do we need suc h a ram rajy? It is also shown in Ramayan that Ram fought with his own children. h a ram rajy? It is also shown in Ramayan that Ram fought with his own children.

How can such a rajy(kingdom) be praise worthy? How can such a rajy(kingdom) be praise worthy?

Some say- The Sita sent to forest was not real Sita. It was just an illusion. TH Some say- The Sita sent to forest was not real Sita. It was just an illusion. TH EN WHAT IS TEACHING OF RAMAYAN FOR A COMMON MAN? Should he send his wife to fore EN WHAT IS TEACHING OF RAMAYAN FOR A COMMON MAN? Should he send his wife to fore st if someone criticizes his wife? If yes, then how can that Sita be just illusi st if someone criticizes his wife? If yes, then how can that Sita be just illusi on? If not, then what teaching the incident of sending Sita to forest teach us? on? If not, then what teaching the incident of sending Sita to forest teach us? 19)It is said in scriptures that - the ashareeravani spoke- THE EIGHTH CHILD OF 19)It is said in scriptures that - the ashareeravani spoke- THE EIGHTH CHILD OF DEVAKI WILL KILL KANSA (Devaki’s elder brother). Hearing this Kansa imprisoned her DEVAKI WILL KILL KANSA (Devaki’s elder brother). Hearing this Kansa imprisoned her

with her husband. Now the question is- why did he put them together? He could h with her husband. Now the question is- why did he put them together? He could h ave imprisoned separately, is it not?

ave imprisoned separately, is it not?

Then no child will take birth. Ok- let us agree that he was a fool. Now- when De Then no child will take birth. Ok- let us agree that he was a fool. Now- when De vaki was seeing her every child being killed one after the other by Kansa, how c vaki was seeing her every child being killed one after the other by Kansa, how c an she think of bearing next child? Devaki and her husband continued to do sex i an she think of bearing next child? Devaki and her husband continued to do sex i n prison!? Just think- A satwik person if put in jail, he is not likely to do su n prison!? Just think- A satwik person if put in jail, he is not likely to do su ch actions(sex). But the couple continued till the eighth delivery! Ok- let us b ch actions(sex). But the couple continued till the eighth delivery! Ok- let us b elieve that everything was God’s Maya.

elieve that everything was God’s Maya.

Now- Is this part of ancient culture of India? What spiritual power a person wil Now- Is this part of ancient culture of India? What spiritual power a person wil l get by reading/following such ugly stories? So- do all these stories say- ever l get by reading/following such ugly stories? So- do all these stories say- ever ything is God’s Maya and there is no need to put spiritual effort for progress? ything is God’s Maya and there is no need to put spiritual effort for progress? ---

--- ---If we think If we think

sensibly-1)GOD CANNOT INCARNATE IN EVERY YUG/AGE. HIS INCARNATION PERIOD CAN BE ONLY AT T 1)GOD CANNOT INCARNATE IN EVERY YUG/AGE. HIS INCARNATION PERIOD CAN BE ONLY AT T HE

(7)

e purpose

e purpose of incarnation of incarnation of god of god is to is to establish dharma. Hence establish dharma. Hence after his after his incarnaincarna tion, we should go back to the previous yug/age. Actually we should go back to t tion, we should go back to the previous yug/age. Actually we should go back to t he first age, Satyug. Because dharma is best in Satyug and worst in Kaliyug. he first age, Satyug. Because dharma is best in Satyug and worst in Kaliyug. Also note that God cannot incarnate till the end of Kaliyug. Because dharma does Also note that God cannot incarnate till the end of Kaliyug. Because dharma does

not become fully before the end of Kaliyug. not become fully before the end of Kaliyug.

So how can he come (=how is it logical for God to incarnate)? Usually a house is So how can he come (=how is it logical for God to incarnate)? Usually a house is not destroyed in its middle of the age. The whole of its life span is utilized not destroyed in its middle of the age. The whole of its life span is utilized before it is destroyed {forget today’s exceptions where man is ready to do anythin before it is destroyed {forget today’s exceptions where man is ready to do anythin g with greed. Today is time of climax and anything can happen). Similarly God wi g with greed. Today is time of climax and anything can happen). Similarly God wi ll have to wait till the near end of Kaliyug is reached.

ll have to wait till the near end of Kaliyug is reached.

[It is said in scriptures-- Religion/dharma has four(100%) legs in the beginning [It is said in scriptures-- Religion/dharma has four(100%) legs in the beginning of SatYug (Golden Age) and three legs(75%) in the beginning of Silver Age. In t of SatYug (Golden Age) and three legs(75%) in the beginning of Silver Age. In t he beginning of Copper Age, it reduces to two(50%) and in the beginning of Iron he beginning of Copper Age, it reduces to two(50%) and in the beginning of Iron Age, it reduces to one(25%). At the end of Iron Age, it hardly exists. That is t Age, it reduces to one(25%). At the end of Iron Age, it hardly exists. That is t he time when all the religions become irreligious].

he time when all the religions become irreligious]. Supporting

Supporting

points:-a)God is called as Purifier. Hence after his incarnation, pure (golden) age shou a)God is called as Purifier. Hence after his incarnation, pure (golden) age shou ld get established.

ld get established.

b)God is called sarv ka sadgati-daata (Benefactor of all). So God will have to c b)God is called sarv ka sadgati-daata (Benefactor of all). So God will have to c ome when the population is maximum. That is- when all the souls are present in C ome when the population is maximum. That is- when all the souls are present in C orporeal world. It would be during the end of Kaliyug only. Because before incar orporeal world. It would be during the end of Kaliyug only. Because before incar nation of God no one can go back. Because to get sadgati(= true status or good s nation of God no one can go back. Because to get sadgati(= true status or good s tatus), God’s company is needed).

tatus), God’s company is needed).

Also sarv(all) should be in durgati(degraded state) when God descends. Today we Also sarv(all) should be in durgati(degraded state) when God descends. Today we can see it. Even the human Gurus have degraded and are caught by ego and also by can see it. Even the human Gurus have degraded and are caught by ego and also by

worldly laws of Kaliyugi politicians. worldly laws of Kaliyugi politicians.

Just see- a Kingdom becomes weak when the King is weak. So religion also become Just see- a Kingdom becomes weak when the King is weak. So religion also become s irreligious when its heads become weak or irreligious, is it not?

s irreligious when its heads become weak or irreligious, is it not?

Today we can see the religious heads (the so called Jagadgurus, Mullas, Popes, Today we can see the religious heads (the so called Jagadgurus, Mullas, Popes, priests) are weak and adharmis. So God comes when sarv (= all, even these human priests) are weak and adharmis. So God comes when sarv (= all, even these human gurus) are in durgati (degraded state).

gurus) are in durgati (degraded state).

c) Significance of “sarvadharmaan parityajya maamekum sharanam vraja, ahum twaa sa c) Significance of “sarvadharmaan parityajya maamekum sharanam vraja, ahum twaa sa rva paapebhyO, mokshayishyaami maa shuchaha – (18-66) = Sacrifice all the religion rva paapebhyO, mokshayishyaami maa shuchaha – (18-66) = Sacrifice all the religion s and surrender to me. I will liberate you from all your sins”.

s and surrender to me. I will liberate you from all your sins”.

In scriptures there is no mention about what all were the different religions du In scriptures there is no mention about what all were the different religions du ring the end of Dwapur Age. Hence it implies that the gita written is not applic ring the end of Dwapur Age. Hence it implies that the gita written is not applic able for that time. That is- it implies gita is incorrect. But it can/may imply able for that time. That is- it implies gita is incorrect. But it can/may imply that some event had occurred long before (say - in previous kalpa= time cycle) a that some event had occurred long before (say - in previous kalpa= time cycle) a nd gita is an attempt to recollect that event. Since there is obviously long gap nd gita is an attempt to recollect that event. Since there is obviously long gap (-explained shortly) between the event (establishment of dharma = incarnation o (-explained shortly) between the event (establishment of dharma = incarnation o f God) and writing of its scripture, there could be error.

f God) and writing of its scripture, there could be error.

Note that- if there is more than one religion at a time, it implies that Note that- if there is more than one religion at a time, it implies that all those religions are weak. For example- a lady needs just one husband. If sh all those religions are weak. For example- a lady needs just one husband. If sh e has two, it implies that both are weak or degraded. So- if there is more than e has two, it implies that both are weak or degraded. So- if there is more than one religion it implies all those religions are irreligious.

one religion it implies all those religions are irreligious.

Also note that when there is true religion, there cannot be scripture. Because a Also note that when there is true religion, there cannot be scripture. Because a healthy/religious person will not have medicine/scripture at home. One who has healthy/religious person will not have medicine/scripture at home. One who has fear or experienced at least some ill health only will keep medicine. It is said fear or experienced at least some ill health only will keep medicine. It is said

(8)

– one realizes unhealthiness (irreligiousness) only after losing 50% of health. S – one realizes unhealthiness (irreligiousness) only after losing 50% of health. S o it is clear that scriptures can come only after Dwapur Yug when dharma degrade o it is clear that scriptures can come only after Dwapur Yug when dharma degrade s to below 50%.

s to below 50%.

So- Now- if we assume that time is cyclic and has four ages, in the first half o So- Now- if we assume that time is cyclic and has four ages, in the first half o f the cycle, religion is religious (= religion is above 50%), there can be only f the cycle, religion is religious (= religion is above 50%), there can be only one religion and it should not have scripture. That should be in Satyug (Golden one religion and it should not have scripture. That should be in Satyug (Golden Age) and Treta Yug (Silver Age). After Copper Age, the/this religion decreases t Age) and Treta Yug (Silver Age). After Copper Age, the/this religion decreases t o below 50%, that is it becomes weak. Then only other religions can take birth. o below 50%, that is it becomes weak. Then only other religions can take birth. Else when the first religion is good and powerful, no one could be attracted/con Else when the first religion is good and powerful, no one could be attracted/con verted into other religions. If the first husband is powerful, wife won’t get devi verted into other religions. If the first husband is powerful, wife won’t get devi ated.

ated.

So this implies that God will create just one religion and other religions will So this implies that God will create just one religion and other religions will be created by human beings. Also God will not rule the world, because in that ca be created by human beings. Also God will not rule the world, because in that ca se, the world can never get degraded. So- God will descend at the end of kaliyug se, the world can never get degraded. So- God will descend at the end of kaliyug and establish saddharma = true religion and return back and keep quite. This wi and establish saddharma = true religion and return back and keep quite. This wi ll put an end to kaliyug and transform it into Satyug and then that true religio ll put an end to kaliyug and transform it into Satyug and then that true religio n will begin from satyug. In this way the time cycle is sustained.

n will begin from satyug. In this way the time cycle is sustained.

Since from Satyug God is absent in the physical world, the true/best/first relig Since from Satyug God is absent in the physical world, the true/best/first relig ion starts degrading. Now- when time reaches/enters into Dwapur Age, other relig ion starts degrading. Now- when time reaches/enters into Dwapur Age, other relig ions come one by one. Since they already had disease in the beginning itself (th ions come one by one. Since they already had disease in the beginning itself (th ere was violence from the very beginning of some religions and they were never d ere was violence from the very beginning of some religions and they were never d ivine), They needed scripture immediately for their existence/maintenance. So fo ivine), They needed scripture immediately for their existence/maintenance. So fo llowers of those religions created/wrote books of their religion. Since they had llowers of those religions created/wrote books of their religion. Since they had written their scriptures very soon after the period of their religious fathers, written their scriptures very soon after the period of their religious fathers, they had enough data with them and hence errors in their scriptures are less. they had enough data with them and hence errors in their scriptures are less. Also since by Copper Age, even the first religion also had got degraded, they al Also since by Copper Age, even the first religion also had got degraded, they al so write scripture of their religion. But two ages had already passed and they h so write scripture of their religion. But two ages had already passed and they h ad no enough correct data to write. So there would be maximum confusion. SO- IT ad no enough correct data to write. So there would be maximum confusion. SO- IT IMPLIES THAT THE SCRIPTURE OF THE FIRST/BEST RELIGION WOULD BE PREPARED MUCH LAT IMPLIES THAT THE SCRIPTURE OF THE FIRST/BEST RELIGION WOULD BE PREPARED MUCH LAT ER AFTER ITS ESTABLISHMENT AND HENCE WOULD CONTAIN MAXIMUM NUMBER OF ERRORS. ER AFTER ITS ESTABLISHMENT AND HENCE WOULD CONTAIN MAXIMUM NUMBER OF ERRORS. So-there is long gap between the establishment of the religion (saddharma = sanata there is long gap between the establishment of the religion (saddharma = sanata n religion = Adi sanatan devi devtaa dharm) and the scripture.

n religion = Adi sanatan devi devtaa dharm) and the scripture.

Since any scripture is imperfect (since all get formed only after Copper Age), n Since any scripture is imperfect (since all get formed only after Copper Age), n o real guidance is obtained and all go descending and time of climax reaches by o real guidance is obtained and all go descending and time of climax reaches by the end of kaliyug. Then God descends and gives true knowledge. But God is bodyl the end of kaliyug. Then God descends and gives true knowledge. But God is bodyl ess and hence needs a body to give knowledge. So- he needs to enter a person’s bod ess and hence needs a body to give knowledge. So- he needs to enter a person’s bod y to speak/give knowledge through mouth of the person. Since God does work for n y to speak/give knowledge through mouth of the person. Since God does work for n ew Time Cycle/ kalpa this work of transformation is also called as creation. Hen ew Time Cycle/ kalpa this work of transformation is also called as creation. Hen ce the name of the person in whom God enters is called as BRAHMA. God’s entrance i ce the name of the person in whom God enters is called as BRAHMA. God’s entrance i n a human body is called as divine birth of God and celebrated as Shivratri with n a human body is called as divine birth of God and celebrated as Shivratri with

most simplicity. most simplicity.

[ A proof of Shiv entering a person’s body and using mouth:- During Shivratri, in [ A proof of Shiv entering a person’s body and using mouth:- During Shivratri, in some Shiv temples, a human face is put as a cover on the Shiv ling. Like as if t some Shiv temples, a human face is put as a cover on the Shiv ling. Like as if t he ling wears the face. This implies that Shiv enters a person and uses just his he ling wears the face. This implies that Shiv enters a person and uses just his

mouth (to give knowledge).] mouth (to give knowledge).]

[A note:- If scriptures are enough to get sadgati, then God will lose his import [A note:- If scriptures are enough to get sadgati, then God will lose his import ance! Hence it is clear that just scriptures cannot bring sadgati. (Also, it is ance! Hence it is clear that just scriptures cannot bring sadgati. (Also, it is evident that- even though there are numerous religions and scriptures, the relig evident that- even though there are numerous religions and scriptures, the relig ious power in society goes on degrading). And when God needs to descend, then in ious power in society goes on degrading). And when God needs to descend, then in front of God, the scriptures will have no value. So it is waste to find God jus front of God, the scriptures will have no value. So it is waste to find God jus t from scriptures].

(9)

Those who have listened to Godly knowledge at the end of kaliyug only will get t Those who have listened to Godly knowledge at the end of kaliyug only will get t ransformed into deities (will attain a state of dharma more than 50%) and get en ransformed into deities (will attain a state of dharma more than 50%) and get en trance to heaven.

trance to heaven.

Shiv is also known as mahaakaal = the greatest death. God is bodyless. When he c Shiv is also known as mahaakaal = the greatest death. God is bodyless. When he c omes to this world and completes his role, natural calamaties and civil and atom omes to this world and completes his role, natural calamaties and civil and atom ic war will take place and all the souls get death (liberation from impure bodie ic war will take place and all the souls get death (liberation from impure bodie s). Please note that Krishna is never called as mahaakaal. There is temple Mahak s). Please note that Krishna is never called as mahaakaal. There is temple Mahak aaleshwar in Ujjain which is one of the 12 jyotirlingams of Shiv temples.

aaleshwar in Ujjain which is one of the 12 jyotirlingams of Shiv temples.

In Mahabharat, huge destruction and mass death is shown. But Krishna is never ca In Mahabharat, huge destruction and mass death is shown. But Krishna is never ca lled as mahaakaal. Why? This also implies that Shiv is more near to the post of lled as mahaakaal. Why? This also implies that Shiv is more near to the post of God of gita than Krishna.

God of gita than Krishna.

All the religions know date of establishment of their religions and their respe All the religions know date of establishment of their religions and their respe ctive religious fathers. But Hindus do not know their religion. They are even co ctive religious fathers. But Hindus do not know their religion. They are even co nfused about word Hindu. Some say Hinduism is not a religion, it is a way of liv nfused about word Hindu. Some say Hinduism is not a religion, it is a way of liv ing, etc. This also implies that the present gita of sanscrit is false or cannot ing, etc. This also implies that the present gita of sanscrit is false or cannot

give enough truth. give enough truth.

Today there are many religions. Also all these religions have become ir Today there are many religions. Also all these religions have become ir religious. They fight in the name of God. They do not have any power in them. Al religious. They fight in the name of God. They do not have any power in them. Al l the religions have expectation from others. They even beg from politicians for l the religions have expectation from others. They even beg from politicians for their existence. That is- there is no power in religion today. They also fight their existence. That is- there is no power in religion today. They also fight or do violence on one another.

or do violence on one another.

Significance of the shloka 18-66= “sacrifice all the religions and surrender to me”. Significance of the shloka 18-66= “sacrifice all the religions and surrender to me”.

Since it is wise to sacrifice ego all these religions (Hindu, Islam, Bud Since it is wise to sacrifice ego all these religions (Hindu, Islam, Bud dhism, Christianity, etc)- because all are weak and irreligious. So this clearly dhism, Christianity, etc)- because all are weak and irreligious. So this clearly implies god of gita- the real God descends/incarnates during the end of Kaliyug implies god of gita- the real God descends/incarnates during the end of Kaliyug (because that is the only period when there are more number of religions) and d (because that is the only period when there are more number of religions) and d irects to sacrifice all these religions and surrender to him. This clearly impli irects to sacrifice all these religions and surrender to him. This clearly impli es no religion or scripture created by human beings can help human beings.

es no religion or scripture created by human beings can help human beings.

d)Significance of “dharmasamsthaapanaarthaaya,… = I come to establish dharma”:- God co d)Significance of “dharmasamsthaapanaarthaaya,… = I come to establish dharma”:- God co mes to

mes to establish SANAATAN establish SANAATAN religion. The word religion. The word sanaatan is sanaatan is very famous very famous in Hinduisin Hinduis m. But Hindus cannot explain its meaning. On one hand they say sanaatan is the o m. But Hindus cannot explain its meaning. On one hand they say sanaatan is the o ne which is oldest but they say- Sanaatan Hindu religion.

ne which is oldest but they say- Sanaatan Hindu religion.

Indians say- SANTAN HINDU RELIGION. But the word HINDU is given by Persians and Indians say- SANTAN HINDU RELIGION. But the word HINDU is given by Persians and hence not ancient. So how can the saying SANAATAN HINDU RELIGION is correct? hence not ancient. So how can the saying SANAATAN HINDU RELIGION is correct?

{BKs’explanation:- The full name is AADI SANAATAN DEVI DEVTAA DHARM, also called a {BKs’explanation:- The full name is AADI SANAATAN DEVI DEVTAA DHARM, also called a s DEITY religion. Sanaatan = santaan = children.

s DEITY religion. Sanaatan = santaan = children.

All are children of God, but those who realize him are his first(= aadi) childre All are children of God, but those who realize him are his first(= aadi) childre n. So

n. So ASDDDharm means ASDDDharm means religion of religion of the first children the first children of God. of God. The other The other religionreligion s are religions of next children of God, because they realize God later -after t s are religions of next children of God, because they realize God later -after t oo late board = at the time of destruction].

oo late board = at the time of destruction].

e)Even in this world, the work of VIPs is special. Their efficiency will be high e)Even in this world, the work of VIPs is special. Their efficiency will be high . Even a visit of the President to a village can develop/help it a lot. But if w . Even a visit of the President to a village can develop/help it a lot. But if w e believe God(the highest VIP) comes during every age but the world goes on degr e believe God(the highest VIP) comes during every age but the world goes on degr ading, it is not only foolishness but also insulting our most beloved god father ading, it is not only foolishness but also insulting our most beloved god father .

.

--- ---

---2)CAN GOD HAVE DIFFERENT NAMES? 2)CAN GOD HAVE DIFFERENT NAMES?

Indian scriptures say god takes different forms during different incarnations. S Indian scriptures say god takes different forms during different incarnations. S

(10)

ometimes they say God has no name and forms. They say chant god’s name (naam kaa s ometimes they say God has no name and forms. They say chant god’s name (naam kaa s maran) and remember him (dhyaana). All these statements violate one another. Let maran) and remember him (dhyaana). All these statements violate one another. Let

us try to find truth. us try to find truth.

Let us discuss about RICE. In English, it is called rice. In hindi, CHAAVAL, in Let us discuss about RICE. In English, it is called rice. In hindi, CHAAVAL, in Kannada language, it is called as AKKI . Why does its name change? BECAUSE IT HA Kannada language, it is called as AKKI . Why does its name change? BECAUSE IT HA S NO AUTHORITY OVER ITSELF. SOME OTHER PEOPLE USE/OWN IT. It becomes property of S NO AUTHORITY OVER ITSELF. SOME OTHER PEOPLE USE/OWN IT. It becomes property of other people. Hence those people name it according to their wish. So each one c other people. Hence those people name it according to their wish. So each one c alls it by his choice. Sometimes different religion people may call it by differ alls it by his choice. Sometimes different religion people may call it by differ ent names.

ent names.

Parents keep name of their children, because the child is owned by them. But whe Parents keep name of their children, because the child is owned by them. But whe n the child grows up, it can change its name according to its wish. See the diff n the child grows up, it can change its name according to its wish. See the diff erence!

erence!

Note that name of a person does not change as language changes. It remains same Note that name of a person does not change as language changes. It remains same even in different religions. A person whose name is John will have same name in even in different religions. A person whose name is John will have same name in any language, country or religion (= irrespective of in which country he moves t any language, country or religion (= irrespective of in which country he moves t o or in which language he speaks). Because his authority is more than that of th o or in which language he speaks). Because his authority is more than that of th e language.

e language.

But when a person changes his religion, his name changes! Because he bowed/surre But when a person changes his religion, his name changes! Because he bowed/surre ndered himself to the other religion. He respected the other religion more than ndered himself to the other religion. He respected the other religion more than himself. He gave up his authority. Hence his name changes.

himself. He gave up his authority. Hence his name changes.

So it is clear that the name of the highest authority cannot be changed by lower So it is clear that the name of the highest authority cannot be changed by lower authorities. GOD IS THE HIGHEST AUTHORITY. HENCE NO HUMAN BEING CAN NAME GOD. A authorities. GOD IS THE HIGHEST AUTHORITY. HENCE NO HUMAN BEING CAN NAME GOD. A LSO SINCE THERE IS NO CHANGE IN GOD (LIKE GETTING CONVERTED INTO OTHER RELIGIONS LSO SINCE THERE IS NO CHANGE IN GOD (LIKE GETTING CONVERTED INTO OTHER RELIGIONS , ETC), HIS NAME SHOULD ALSO REMAIN CONSTANT. HENCE GOD SHOULD HAVE ONE PERMANEN , ETC), HIS NAME SHOULD ALSO REMAIN CONSTANT. HENCE GOD SHOULD HAVE ONE PERMANEN T ETERNAL NAME WHICH CAN NEVER CHANGE. THAT NAME IS SHIV.

T ETERNAL NAME WHICH CAN NEVER CHANGE. THAT NAME IS SHIV.

Even though no one has right to name God and God can have only one name, today w Even though no one has right to name God and God can have only one name, today w e can see different people/religions call God by different names. THIS CLEARLY I e can see different people/religions call God by different names. THIS CLEARLY I MPLIES NO RELIGION (OR ALL BUT EXCEPT ONE) KNOWS GOD’S REAL NAME!

MPLIES NO RELIGION (OR ALL BUT EXCEPT ONE) KNOWS GOD’S REAL NAME! SUPPORTING POINTS FOR THE NAME

SUPPORTING POINTS FOR THE NAME

SHIV:-a)The word SADAA_SHIV (= always Shiv) is famous. Sadaa (= always= constant= eter a)The word SADAA_SHIV (= always Shiv) is famous. Sadaa (= always= constant= eter nal) is not joined with any name other than Shiv. It is never said SADAA_KRISHN nal) is not joined with any name other than Shiv. It is never said SADAA_KRISHN or SADAA_RAM. Hence it is clear that Shiv always remains as Shiv.

or SADAA_RAM. Hence it is clear that Shiv always remains as Shiv.

He does not change at all. Hence he is truth. This also implies Sri Krishna and He does not change at all. Hence he is truth. This also implies Sri Krishna and Sri Ram do not have eternal existence in the same name and form. That is- since Sri Ram do not have eternal existence in the same name and form. That is- since they come in birth and deaths, their name and forms change. But Shiv is above bi they come in birth and deaths, their name and forms change. But Shiv is above bi rth and deaths.

rth and deaths.

b)The word Shivohum (= I am Shiv) is famous. There is no any other word that say b)The word Shivohum (= I am Shiv) is famous. There is no any other word that say s Krishnohum (= I am Krishna), Ramohum(I am Ram). So this implies Shiv had come s Krishnohum (= I am Krishna), Ramohum(I am Ram). So this implies Shiv had come to this world and has spoke, “I AM SHIV”.

to this world and has spoke, “I AM SHIV”.

For what cause it may be? All the souls might have forgotten real God. Hence Shi For what cause it may be? All the souls might have forgotten real God. Hence Shi v might have to say- “Hey My dear children, I am Shiv, I am Shiv”. Like parents teac v might have to say- “Hey My dear children, I am Shiv, I am Shiv”. Like parents teac h their small children, I am your father, mother, etc, even god needs to say, “I a h their small children, I am your father, mother, etc, even god needs to say, “I a m your Godfather”, because we people forget God totally and become irreligious due m your Godfather”, because we people forget God totally and become irreligious due

to body consciouness. to body consciouness.

The word Shivohum also implies that- Shiv does not take births like Sri Krishna The word Shivohum also implies that- Shiv does not take births like Sri Krishna

and Sri Ram. In fact, there is no need to say “I am Sri Krishna, I am Sri Ram” for S and Sri Ram. In fact, there is no need to say “I am Sri Krishna, I am Sri Ram” for S ri Krishna and Sri Ram. Because they had taken birth from their parents. They ca ri Krishna and Sri Ram. Because they had taken birth from their parents. They ca nnot speak until the age of one or two years. By that time, their parents will c nnot speak until the age of one or two years. By that time, their parents will c

(11)

all their names, you are Sri Krishna, you are Sri Ram, etc. all their names, you are Sri Krishna, you are Sri Ram, etc.

By the time they grew up, many would already know their names. Hence it would be By the time they grew up, many would already know their names. Hence it would be foolishness if Sri Krishna or Sri Ram begins speaking I am Sri Krishna, I am Sr foolishness if Sri Krishna or Sri Ram begins speaking I am Sri Krishna, I am Sr i Ram all of a sudden (when they get matured).

i Ram all of a sudden (when they get matured).

But Shiv does not enter mother’s womb. He enters a person’s body. Hence he needs to But Shiv does not enter mother’s womb. He enters a person’s body. Hence he needs to say- I am Shiv (Shivohum). Moreover Ram, and Krishna are visible personalities, say- I am Shiv (Shivohum). Moreover Ram, and Krishna are visible personalities, but Shiv is invisible(bodyless). So there is need to remind more. Also it is nec but Shiv is invisible(bodyless). So there is need to remind more. Also it is nec essary to remember just one Shiv.

essary to remember just one Shiv.

c)Shiv Jayanti (birth = incarnation of Shiv) of is also known as Shiv_raatri. Th c)Shiv Jayanti (birth = incarnation of Shiv) of is also known as Shiv_raatri. Th e word raatri (night) is not connected to any other person than Shiv . This impl e word raatri (night) is not connected to any other person than Shiv . This impl ies Shiv came in the deep night of ignorance.

ies Shiv came in the deep night of ignorance.

[Even though birth of Krishna is shown in night, it is celebrated during day] [Even though birth of Krishna is shown in night, it is celebrated during day] d)Glory of Shiv temples is the highest and hence Shiv is the highest. No temple d)Glory of Shiv temples is the highest and hence Shiv is the highest. No temple of Sri Krishna or Sri Ram can be equal to even 10% of that of Shiv (Eg:- Somnath of Sri Krishna or Sri Ram can be equal to even 10% of that of Shiv (Eg:- Somnath ).

).

e)The word

e)The word RUDR YAJN, RUDR YAJN, JNAAN YAJN JNAAN YAJN is famous. There is famous. There is no is no name KRISHN name KRISHN YAJN. ThisYAJN. This also implies that Rudr (another name of Shiv) is one who can give jnaan (knowled also implies that Rudr (another name of Shiv) is one who can give jnaan (knowled ge). Hence the highest knowledge which is gita can be given by just Shiva only. ge). Hence the highest knowledge which is gita can be given by just Shiva only. How can then Sri Krishna be god of gita? The word jnaaehswar, yogeshwar are famo How can then Sri Krishna be god of gita? The word jnaaehswar, yogeshwar are famo us. There is no name jnaanaKrishna, yogakrishna, etc.

us. There is no name jnaanaKrishna, yogakrishna, etc.

f)Shiv is called as trinetri (the one who has third eye). No other deity has thi f)Shiv is called as trinetri (the one who has third eye). No other deity has thi s title. The third eye is significance of eye of knowledge or wisdom. So authori s title. The third eye is significance of eye of knowledge or wisdom. So authori ty over knowledge can be with Shiva. How can that be with Sri Krishna? Gita is t ty over knowledge can be with Shiva. How can that be with Sri Krishna? Gita is t he highest knowledge so Shiv only can give it.

he highest knowledge so Shiv only can give it.

g)In scriptures it is also said- UPA_NAYAN. Another name for Upanayan is BRAHMOP g)In scriptures it is also said- UPA_NAYAN. Another name for Upanayan is BRAHMOP ADESH. Upanayan is a ritual done for male child in braahmin caste (usually betwe ADESH. Upanayan is a ritual done for male child in braahmin caste (usually betwe en 5 to 12 yrs of age). It is also said that till Upanayan, THERE IS NO DIFFEREN en 5 to 12 yrs of age). It is also said that till Upanayan, THERE IS NO DIFFEREN CE BETWEEN A BRAAHMIN CHILD AND SHUDRA CHILD. It is after Upanayan only even the CE BETWEEN A BRAAHMIN CHILD AND SHUDRA CHILD. It is after Upanayan only even the braahmin child gets eligibility to be called as braahmin. It is believed that i braahmin child gets eligibility to be called as braahmin. It is believed that i t is during upanayan the child receives highest knowledge and that is called as t is during upanayan the child receives highest knowledge and that is called as Brahmopadesh.

Brahmopadesh.

In fact, Upa = extra, nayan= eye. Upanayan means extra eye means third eye of kn In fact, Upa = extra, nayan= eye. Upanayan means extra eye means third eye of kn owledge. Now Shiva only is called as trinetri. So without him, how can Upanayan owledge. Now Shiva only is called as trinetri. So without him, how can Upanayan will be complete?

will be complete?

Upanayan is also called as Brahmopadesh. So it implies that the third eye is giv Upanayan is also called as Brahmopadesh. So it implies that the third eye is giv en through Brahma. So it clearly implies that Shiva only can give third eye(know en through Brahma. So it clearly implies that Shiva only can give third eye(know ledge) and he needs Brahma to give it. This implies that Shiva is bodyless and h ledge) and he needs Brahma to give it. This implies that Shiva is bodyless and h ence needs a corporeal body of Brahma to give/speak knowledge. It also clearly i ence needs a corporeal body of Brahma to give/speak knowledge. It also clearly i mplies that till the third eye is received from Shiva through Brahma nobody can mplies that till the third eye is received from Shiva through Brahma nobody can be eligible for the title braahmin.

be eligible for the title braahmin.

Also it is said braahmins are created through mouth of Brahma. So- it implies th Also it is said braahmins are created through mouth of Brahma. So- it implies th at those who listen to godly knowledge from Shiv through mouth of Brahma are rea at those who listen to godly knowledge from Shiv through mouth of Brahma are rea l braahmins. So, real Gita is spoken by Shiv through Brahma.

l braahmins. So, real Gita is spoken by Shiv through Brahma.

Also during upanayan, the Brahmin child takes oath that he will maintain purity Also during upanayan, the Brahmin child takes oath that he will maintain purity in his thoughts, speech and actions. Even the gita directs the same. So do not t in his thoughts, speech and actions. Even the gita directs the same. So do not t hese clearly imply that Shiva incarnates through Brahma and gives knowledge whic hese clearly imply that Shiva incarnates through Brahma and gives knowledge whic

References

Related documents

Announced new indian passport rules india acquires a right place where you must complete part b manually with a visa and save the country or the travel?. But recommended that the

Integration Centric Enterprise Application Integration Business Process Integration Business Process Management Human Centric Document imaging Business Process Management

Agreement to (1) review and make recommendations for the CPD’s policies, practices, and training regarding investigatory stops and protective pat downs; (2) audit Investiga- tory

As an important stakeholder, the University of Strasbourg must take concrete measures in research, teaching and innovation as well as in its own running and campus life. The

prikupi opisne značajke svih poruka iz trening skupa pri čemu će klasifikator znati koja poruka je prava, a koja neželjena iz trening skupa.. Kada se klasifikatoru da novi

Ultimate creator and human body is that god became human form again at the idea, for the isle of eternity.. August 9 2020 by Paul Barnes Leave a Comment Madison Christian Church Core

Consider and take possible action on Amendment to Investment Policy Statement re Statement of Objectives for Western Asset Management Intermediate Credit Fixed Income

Aus seiner Feder stammen auch El Gran Teatre del Liceu de Barcelona (1837-1930) sowie das Buch Los Maestros Cantores de Nuremberg [Die Meistersinger von Nürnberg], das