• No results found

Business Ethics 2015.pptx

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Business Ethics 2015.pptx"

Copied!
17
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

C r a i g Va t t i a t

Ore go n C i t y Hi g h S ch o o l

Ad a p te d f ro m We s t ’s Bu s i ne s s L a w a nd L a w f o r B us i n e s s a n d Pe r s o n a l Us e , 19 e

(2)
(3)

Ethics – a collection of standards of conduct

and moral judgment forming the basis for a

reasoned, impartial decision as to what is right or wrong.

OR

How moral principles are applied to daily life.

It pursues the question of what people ought to

do when faced with choices.

What is fair?

What is just?

What is the right thing to do in this situation?

Ethics are refl ected in laws. They refl ect

society’s customs and values.

Ex: murder is unethical and against the law

(4)

Ethics involves impartiality – the

standards must apply to everyone.

Ex: racial profiling is not impartial

Ethics involves making decisions based on

reason, not emotion.

Ex: You don’t want to report a friend that

committed a crime, but it is ethical to do so.

There can be ethical gray area, where it is

not always clear what is the right thing to

do (confl icting interests).

Ex: New product that benefits many but

might have undesirable side effects for a

small percentage of users

(5)
(6)

Business ethics – focuses on right and wrong

behavior in business and applying moral principles in

workplace decisions.

Business law encourages ethical business decisions.

Honor contractual commitments

Don’t engage in fraud, deceit

Sometimes business decisions are legal but

unethical.

Ex: Selling a dangerous toy, banned in the US, to other

countries where there are weaker consumer protections.

The law cannot make ethical decisions for us

(7)

Decision making in business is complicated

by the goal of profi t maximization.

Tension between pursuit of profi ts and

welfare of those aff ected by this pursuit.

Business decisions often have wider eff ects

than personal decisions.

Example: Paying low wages to employees to

help the “bottom line.” (criticism of

Wal-Mart)

Those aff ected by a company’s actions are

called stakeholders.

(8)

As a business person or employee in any

environment, you must be prepared to justify

your decisions to others (law enforcement,

employers, the public, fellow employees, etc.)

Amongst alternatives, why was your decision

the right one?

Not enough to say, “It seemed like the right

decision to make” or “I tried my best.”

(9)

Employees- safety, compensation, equal treatment, privacy, freedom

from harassment, whistleblowing.

Ex: Enron executives encouraging employees to buy stock in Enron, all the while knowing they were in a financial crisis

Customers - marketing techniques, product safety, consumer protection

Ex: Joe Camel used as a mascot to market to youth, GM failing to correct a problem with the ignition in its cars

Owners – managers’ duties to shareholders.

Ex: Tyco executive throwing company funded party for his wife

Competitors - fair competition and collusion

Ex: price fi xing

Society - pollution, natural resources

Ex: BP and Deep Horizon oil well explosion in the gulf coast due to poor safety

Globally - exploitation of developing countries and workers, bribery of

foreign offi cials, confl icting values\cultural diff erences.

Ex: Nestle pushing baby formula in Africa and discouraging mothers from using breast milk

(10)

multiple perspective s on how to make

(11)

Means: (deontology, from Greek deon meaning

duty)

Seeks to put the decision-maker of the shoes of those to be

affected by their decisions and to ask if you would be satisfied by the action.

Embodied by the Golden Rule.

Actions must be judged by their motives and means as well

as their results.

German philosopher Immanuel Kant stated that individuals

should evaluate their actions in light of the consequences that would follow if everyone in society acted in the same way (cheating on a test).

It is rule-based; there are can’t be exceptions, it needs to

be universal.

(12)

Ends: The Greatest Good (utilitarianism)

Moral actions are those that produce the greatest net

pleasure compared with net pain.

 Theory developed by Jeremy Bentham, advanced by Stuart Mill

It is outcome oriented. Here, the ends justify the means. A decision is right when among the people it aff ects, it

produces the greatest amount of good for the greatest number.

1) who will be aff ected

2) an assessment of the negative and positive eff ects of the various alternatives

3) a choice that produces the maximum utility (greatest good).

Q: What “good” is being sought? Monetary? Justice?

(13)

ETHICAL

RESPONSIBILITIES OF

(14)

Is maximizing profi t the only responsibility of business? Our

economic system is based on the pursuit of self-interest.

Competition helps to keep companies in check but it needs

help. We still need "regulation" whether by the business itself or by the government. Ideally in business, the

shareholders keep the management accountable for their

actions. But the reality is that shareholders are far removed from decision-making. Many big companies are controlled by few people.

This has changed as a result of new rules from the US SEC

and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Both require more outside directors and additional safeguards to keep

companies in check.

(15)

Social responsibility

 is

an ethical framework

which suggests that an

entity, be it an

organization or

individual, has an

obligation to act for the

benefi t of society at

large.

(16)

Social Contract - Because society allows for the

creation of corporations and gives them special

rights, corporations owe a responsibility to our

society.

Less gov't regulation - If companies managed

themselves responsibly, government would have less

reason to get involved.

 

Long-Run Profi ts - Corporate involvement in social

causes creates goodwill, which simply makes good

business sense.

(17)

Profi tability - Companies exist to make a profi t and any other

concern distracts them from achieving this goal.

Unfairness- Money spent on social issues is money taken

away from the employees and owners who rightfully have a priority.

 

Expertise - Companies are experts in producing and selling

their product but not necessarily managing socially useful activities.

 

Accountability- Consumers can vote with their dollars

regarding concerns of theirs. Companies may wield too much power in supporting social causes it sees important. Could also provide money for groups "with strings attached."

References

Related documents