NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P : : : : : : : : :

Appellant’s claim that the trial court imposed an excessive sentence, coupled with his claim the trial court failed to consider mitigating circumstances and

at 13 (emphasis in original). Jacobs maintains that the trial court abused its discretion by not accepting wholesale Dr. This amounts to a challenge to the weight of

As such, Eden’s assertion that the trial court erred when it sentenced him consecutively resulting in a lengthy aggregate sentence fails to raise a substantial

assumptions that the parked car was the pursued vehicle, that Appellant was the man seen running from the parked car, and that Appellant had been driving the parked

[Sidhu] maintains that the evidence at his trial was not sufficient to establish with respect to either Abbey Krepps, Terry Stoner, or Jeremy Kensinger

at 15 (some capitalization omitted). In sum, in his last two issues on appeal, Appellant avers that the trial court erred by ordering restitution on the acquitted charge of

1 The trial court’s March 19, 2010 judgment of sentence imposed 9 to 18 months of incarceration followed by 18 months of probation... re-sentenced her to 3 to 12 months

‘immediately,’ or within the time specified in a bilateral agreement between the United States and a foreign national’s country, regardless of whether the