7S
815
TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s 7S 9X 0 TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s7S9X0
Environmental Performance of Buildings
TU/e Dept. of the Built Environment
7S
815
TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s 7S 9X 0•
Do you know how much m
3
gas the dwelling
you live in uses for heating?
–
Is it performing well?
•
Do you enjoy the IEQ?
–
IEQ: Indoor Environmental Quality
–
Thermal comfort, Indoor air quality, Acoustical
comfort, Visual comfort
7S
815
TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s 7S 9X 0 3Who?
Lecturers
•
Prof. Jan Hensen
•
Dr. Ignacio Torrens Galdiz
•
Dr. Marcel Loomans
•
Rajesh Kotireddy
•
Isabella Gaetani
Unit
Building Physics and Services
Department of the Built Environment
7S
815
TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s 7S 9X 0Who?
Students
7S
815
TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s 7S 9X 0 5What?
Building performance - a definition
High Performance Building:
“…, the term "high performance building" means a
building that integrates and optimizes all major
high-performance building attributes, including
energy efficiency, durability, life-cycle
performance, and occupant productivity...”
NICB. Energy Policy Act of 2005 (Public Law 109-058) Section 914. Building Standardshttps://www.nibs.org PAGE 5
Quality indoor environment
7S
815
TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s 7S 9X 0Why?
Built Environment
•
… consumes ~30-40% world primary energy use
•
… is where we spend ~90% of our time (i.e. indoors)
•
… combines a complex system of requirements
7S
815
TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s 7S 9X 0Requirements…
Source: revolutietheorie.be PAGE 77S
815
TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s 7S 9X 0Built Environment
Source: survival-homestead.com Source: dilbercik.seesaa.net Source: wealddown.co.uk Source: brickfields.org.uk Source: trendsnow.netShelter
PAGE 87S
815
TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s 7S 9X 0Comfort
Comfort
Zeiler et al. TVVL Magazine 2010)
7S
815
TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s 7S 9X 0Comfort
Energy use
[Chen . 2009. Working toward the very low energy consumption bulding of the future. Lbnl
7S
815
TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s 7S 9X 0Comfort & Energy
Performance
What to assess?
How to assess?
[from: presentation Monica Melhado 2008, TU/e]
7S
815
TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s 7S 9X 0Conflicting requirements…
…optimization
Comfort & Energy
Yearly energy use
Co
m
fo
rt c
om
pla
in
ts
Theoretical optimum
Pareto front
Required:
- Performance indicators
- Performance assessment methods
PAGE 12
7S
815
TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s 7S 9X 0Performance Based Building
Performance approach
•
work with the
end result
in mind, not the means.
•
Performance is about what a building has
to do
, not how it is built.
•
A building needs to be
assessed
on its performance in an
objective
manner.
Design
Construction
Use
Demolition
Alternative: prescriptive approach…
7S
815
TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s 7S 9X 07S815 Jan Hensen / Marcel Loomans 14
Performance based building
Prescriptive versus performance
“Turn left at the next traffic lights, then take the fourth street
to the right, go right ahead at the first roundabout, turn to the
right at the second rondabout and keep the left lane, then
turn ……..”
7S
815
TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s 7S 9X 07S815 Jan Hensen / Marcel Loomans 15
Performance based building
Prescriptive versus performance
“To the airport!”
7S
815
TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s 7S 9X 0Performance Based Building
A (simple) example
Have meetings with max. 25 attendants in different settings
(theatre/round table)
Performance requirements
Air quality near persons:
high
(e.g. CO
2
<1000 ppm)
Thermal comfort:
high
(e.g. -0.2 < PMV < 0.2)
Speech intelligibility:
high
(e.g reverberation time: 0.8 – 1.0 sec;
back ground noise (external sources):
max.35 dB(A))
Illuminance:
high
(e.g. table illuminance level: min.500 lux)
Yearly energy use:
low (e.g. <100 kWh/m
2
.a)
Peak cooling load:
medium (e.g. <60 W/m
2
)
7S
815
TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s 7S 9X 0Compare and agree
Performance Based Building
Predicted / measure performance
Compare & agree
Performance requirements
Evaluation techniques
[from: key note presentation on PeBBu, Dik Spekkink, CIB Conference, Helsinki, 2005]
Performance indicators
Client
wishes
Design
solution
PAGE 177S
815
TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s 7S 9X 0Problem
•
Performance indicators
•
Evaluation techniques
Potential
•
Innovation !!!
Performance Based Building
7S
815
TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s 7S 9X 0Performance indicator (PI)
Performance indicator
Property of
a product, building part of building that represents the performance
of it
in relation to the performance
requirement
set.
The indicator should be a
quantitative, qualitative or descriptive
parameter that
can be assessed in a relative straightforward manner.
Example:
Thermal comfort
PPD
e.g. <10%
T
air
, T
mrt
, v, RH (M, I
clo
)
(PI)
(target value)
(parameters)
…
…
7S
815
TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s 7S 9X 0Some examples
Energy related
:
Heating energy demand; Cooling energy demand; Primary energy use
Load related
:
Maximum heating load, Maximum cooling load
Thermal comfort related:
PMV, Operative temperature, Overheating hours
Performance indicators
7S
815
TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s 7S 9X 0BREEAM
(Building Research Establishment
Environmental Assessment Method - UK, also in NL)
LEED
(Leadership in Energy and Environmental
Design – US, used in many other countries)
CASBEE
(Comprehensive Assessment System for
Building Environmental Efficiency - Japan)
…
EPBD
(Energy Performance of Buildings Directive – EU)
Building Performance “Methods”
7S
815
TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s 7S 9X 0Problem
•
Performance indicators
•
Evaluation techniques
Potential
•
Innovation !!!
Performance Based Building
7S
815
TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s 7S 9X 0How to determine in-use ‘building comfort’?
(questionnaires)
7S
815
TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s 7S 9X 0How to determine Energy use? What is good?
PAGE 24
7S
815
TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s 7S 9X 0Objective performance assessment
•
(Expert)
•
Measurement
•
Simulation
Design
Construction
In-use
7S
815
TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s 7S 9X 0 4/23/2015Experiments (lab study)
Schellen, L. Loomans, M., Wit, M., Olesen B.W. & Marken Lichtenbelt, W. van. 2012. The influence of local effects on thermal sensation under non-uniform environmental conditions - gender differences in thermophysiology, thermal comfort and productivity during convective and radiant cooling. Physiology & Behavior, 107(2), 252-261.
Boerstra et al. 2015. Comfort and performance impact of personal control over thermal environment in summer: results from a laboratory study.
7S
815
TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s 7S 9X 0Kemenade et al. 2014. Building comfort performance assessment using a monitoring tool. Proc. Indoor Air 2104
Mors, S. ter, Hensen, J.L.M., Loomans, M.G.L.C. & Boerstra, A. 2011. "Adaptive thermal comfort in primary school classrooms: Creating and validating PMV-based comfort charts". Building and Environment, Volume 46, Issue 12, December 2011, Pages 2454-2461
Boerstra, A.C., Loomans, M.G.L.C. & Hensen, J.L.M. (2013). Personal control over temperature in winter in Dutch office buildings. HVAC&R Research, 19(8), 1033-1050 Te Kulve et al. 2014. Indoor Air in Long Term Care Facilities and Spread of Infectious Diseases. Proc. Indoor Air 2014
Monitored
data
Measurements
Measurements buildings in-use
- offices
- dwellings
- schools
- hospitals
- long-term
care facilities…
• T
• RH
• CO
2
Building sensors
(BS)
• T
• CO
2
PAGE 277S
815
TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s 7S 9X 0Kemenade et al. 2014. Building comfort performance assessment using a monitoring tool. Proc. Indoor Air 2104
Mors, S. ter, Hensen, J.L.M., Loomans, M.G.L.C. & Boerstra, A. 2011. "Adaptive thermal comfort in primary school classrooms: Creating and validating PMV-based comfort charts". Building and Environment, Volume 46, Issue 12, December 2011, Pages 2454-2461
Boerstra, A.C., Loomans, M.G.L.C. & Hensen, J.L.M. (2013). Personal control over temperature in winter in Dutch office buildings. HVAC&R Research, 19(8), 1033-1050. Te Kulve et al. 2014. Indoor Air in Long Term Care Facilities and Spread of Infectious Diseases. Proc. Indoor Air 2014
Results on question thermal sensation: Neutral to warm
Measurements building in-use
7S
815
TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo rm Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s TU /e – B ui ldi ng P er fo Env iro nm ent al P er fo rm anc e o f B ui ldi ng s 7S 9X 0 4/23/2015Simulation
- Whole building simulation (energy, comfort)
- Computational Fluid Dynamics (local comfort)
- Raytracing techniques (visual comfort)
Schellen, L. Loomans, M., Kingma, B., Wit, M. de., Frijns, A. & Marken Lichtenbelt, W. van. 2013. The use of a thermophysiological model in the built environment to predict thermal sensation: Coupling with the indoor environment and thermal sensation. Building and Environment, Volume 59, January 2013, Pages 10–22 PAGE 29