• No results found

Enterprise Shared Services

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Enterprise Shared Services"

Copied!
19
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Enterprise Shared Services

Timothy Rehac

Partner, IT Strategy & Architecture

EMC Consulting

Jim Silvia

Regional Manager

Laserfiche

Dave Kirk

Manager, Enterprise Initiatives

Management of Strategic Technologies Division Department of Information Services

(2)

Agenda

Welcome / Introduction

Establishing Enterprise Shared Services

Enterprise Content Management Shared Service

(3)

Agenda

Welcome / Introduction

Establishing Enterprise Shared Services

Enterprise Shared Services Concepts

How to deploy Shared Services

Case Studies / Lessons Learned

Enterprise Content Management Shared Service

(4)

Centralized / Decentralized Pendulum

Centralized

• Scale

• Efficiency

• Specialization

• Standardization

De-Centralized

• Customer Intimacy

• Alignment

• Flexibility

• Innovation

We have swung back and forth between Centralized and De-Centralized over the

past 40+ years, just swinging back to Centralized is not the answer.

(5)

Service Orientation

A Service is…

“A means of delivering

value

to

customers

by facilitating

outcomes

that customers want to achieve without the direct

ownership of specific

costs

and

risks

.” – ITIL V3

Services have a readily identifiable consumer and provider and

(6)

The Cloud Imperative

Sources: Amazon, EMC CIG, VMware analysis

Utilization

0.0 ¢ 4.0 ¢ 8.0 ¢ 12.0 ¢ 16.0 ¢ 20.0 ¢ 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% 55% 60% 65% 70% 75% 80% Cost / VM hr (2GB inst) Average Enterprise Amazon EC2 Reserved Pricing The Cloud Imperative

(7)

The enterprise challenge is to coordinate service

strategy across three core constituencies

Health Services (human & digital)

Licenses / Permits / Records (human & digital)

Education (human & digital)

Employment (human & digital)

Public Safety (human & digital)

Consulting & Solutions (human)

Licensing Applications (digital)

Unemployment Applications (digital)

Collaboration (digital)

Content Management (digital)

Management (human + automation)

Compute (digital)

Store (digital)

Network (digital)

Desktop (digital)

Clo

ud

Im

pe

tra

tiv

e

Press

ur

e

GOVERNMENT

(8)

The Enterprise needs to govern overall service strategy

Architecture

Design,

Development,

Quality Assure

and Deploy

Infrastructure Services

Security

Service Management

Infrastructure as a Service

Application Services

Software as a Service

Data as a Service Content as a Service Platform as a Service

Health ExpenseTravel &

Search BPM

Licensing CRM Collaboration ECM

Business Services

Business Process

as a Service

Knowledge Health Facilities Travel Licensing Call Center

Finance HR

Government Services

Consumers

Mobile as a Service Desktop as a Service Architecture as a Service Design as a Service Development as a Service Quality Assurance as a Service Deployment as a Service Security as a Service Identity as a Service Authorization as a Service Authentication as a Service Confidentiality as a Service Integrity as a Service Audit as a Service

(9)

Shared Services: Core Building Blocks

 Focus on Efficiency, Lean  Centralization of common

functions

 Service Level Agreements  Transparently charge for

actual Service consumed

 Repeatable, process driven

delivery based on Best Practices / Frameworks

 Separate Demand & Supply

Management

 Focus on Agile, Innovation,

Alignment with Business

 Decentralize Advisory,

Relationship Management & roles requiring intimate business knowledge

 Manage the service as a

business, not a fixed cost

 Offer services customers

value, at the level they prefer

 Provide incentives for

breakthrough methods, improve efficiency, invest in new services

 Competition / benchmarking

ensures Market Competitive pricing

Professional Services

Organization Model

By combining the value provided by three supporting concepts, this model delivers on the

promise of technology at the lowest cost possible.

Service Oriented Organization

Run

As a Business

Shared

(10)

Why Ultimately Shared Services?

Savings of

40 % to 50 %

from IT Shared Services

Savings of

56 % to 63 %

from Integrated

Business Services

(11)

Environment

Organization

Processes

Services

Offerings

Infrastructure

Service Maturity Model

Maturity Level

Level 1

Initial Level 2Supply Focused Level 3 Service Focused Level 4 Demand Focused Level 5 Market Focused Desire to move to Shared Service Strategy, desire to move to Shared Service Communicated Value proposition understood by most Business supports model, model aligns with Business Business & Technology Management Converged Unknown Beginning to segregate Demand/Supply Organization Service Centers Operational Demand & Service Management functions operational Professional Services Org. Model Initial, performed, inconsistently followed Managed, measured against baseline Defined, consistently followed, measured against IT organizations Quantitatively managed, benchmark against leading IT organizations Optimizing, benchmarked against "World Class" Organizations Undefined, Ad hoc Defined -Catalog of "What we do" Refined -Catalog of "Services" Client Centric descriptions of service packages -> Capabilities Complete catalog of Capabilities of IT

& its Partners

Unknown, Incomplete, Required

Required

support in Supports

(12)

Potential Savings Opportunities

Maturity Level

Level 1

Initial Level 2Supply Focused Level 3 Service Focused Level 4 Demand Focused Level 5 Market Focused None Consolidation Standardization, Consolidation, Re-use, Quality Improvement Process Efficiencies, Demand Management, Re-use Process & Sourcing Optimization, Re-use, Innovation None 0 to 10 % 5 to 15 % 5 to 15 % 5 to 10 %

Minimal Intermediate Substantial Intermediate Minimal

1 to 3 Months 6 to 12 Months 9 to 18 Months 6 to 12 Months 6 to 12 Months

Savings

From

Incremental

Savings

Opportunity

Incremental

Investment

Required

Timeframe

(Without

Acceleration)

Total savings of 15 % to 50 % are possible. Without acceleration, realization of full savings

opportunity may be delayed up to 5 years.

Har

v

est

Som

(13)

IT 2.0: SOO - Savings Opportunities

Maturity Level

Level 1

Initial Level 2Supply Focused Level 3 Service Focused Level 4 Demand Focused Level 5 Market Focused None Consolidation Standardization, Consolidation, Re-use, Quality Improvement Process Efficiencies, Demand Management, Re-use Process & Sourcing Optimization, Re-use, Innovation None 0 to 10 % 5 to 15 % 5 to 15 % 5 to 10 %

Savings

From

Incremental

Savings

Opportunity

Supply Focused Required Enablers: • Consolidation / Rationalization of organizational structures • Commitment to achieve savings Service Focused Required Enablers: • Supply Focused + • Strategic Sourcing • Enterprise Architecture (Standardized)

• Process Focus (Performed) • Metrics Focus (Operational) • Service Definition

• Service Level Management • Funding Model (Incentives for Re-use)

Demand Focused Required Enablers:

• Service Focused +

• Service Level Management (multiple service levels) • Funding Model (Consumptive pricing & tiered pricing)

• Demand Management • Metrics Focus (Financial) • Process Focus (Managed) • Enterprise Architecture (Optimized Core) Market Focused Required Enablers: • Demand Focused + • Sourcing Optimization • Metrics Focus (Benchmarking)

• Process Focus (Quantitative) • Funding Model (Incentives for Innovation)

• Enterprise Architecture (Modular)

(14)

> Our client, a global Pharmaceutical Company, was faced with a significant need to reduce costs across their IT organization. At the same time, the client needed to shift IT spending from non-discretionary to more value add

activities

> Prior to this abrupt event, the internal services

organizations had been charged with delivering to the business needs, but had not focused on doing so as cost efficiently as possible

> IT delivered to business needs, but in a siloed, redundant, locally optimized way

> EMC Consulting assisted the client in developing a new IT Operating Model that split Demand and Supply and created Enterprise Shared Services

> EMC Consulting assisted the client in the transformation activities associated with implementing the new

Operating Model

> The client adopted EMC Consulting’s Capability Maturity

Model and Methodology for creating Shared Service Centers enabling a significant acceleration of their schedule

> EMC Consulting supported the growth of the Shared Service Centers with additional delivery and

management capacity

> The Company continues to mature IT along EMC Consulting’s Maturity Model and is focusing on achieving Level 4 - Demand Focused

> The Company has promoted to the CIO to also lead the other major internal service functions and is currently pursuing a Global Shared Services model for these functions

> The Company has reduced IT expense by over

$ 100 Million over 3 years by adopting Shared Services across their IT organization

> The IT group continues to meet its commitments to the business and has improved it’s on-time / on-budget performance

> The Company was able to significantly shift their spend from lights-on activities to enabling business innovation

> The Company is now focused on optimizing solutions at the Enterprise level

Business Challenge

EMC Consulting Solution

Results

(15)
(16)

Shared Services:

Adoption Challenges

Why is the transformation so hard?

Multi-year Transformation

Not an organization model change / Need short and long term goals

Command and Control to Influence

Establishing Trust

Changes to perception of power

I have 300 people reporting to me

I control $ 100 Million in spend

“Worship the Hero” / Firefighter

A lot of people have become successful by being the one person who could “get

things done” – now it takes a team to “get things done”

Most current incentives are incenting the wrong behaviors

Need Entrepreneurs – not operationally focused IT Managers / Executives

Any change brings risk – those managing “Mission Critical” processes can

become particularly risk averse

(17)

Lessons Learned

Transformative change is difficult, success requires vision, sponsorship and a

multi-year strategic plan

Progress will be incremental and across a wide spectrum, a method to measure and

report overall transformation progress is imperative

Measuring and reporting progress of individual Service Centers can be a great

motivational tool and can dramatically impact pace of change

Without a clear vision of the ultimate goal, there is a risk of declaring victory too

early and not fully realizing potential benefits

A common framework for Services / Service Level Agreements is required to

ultimately realize the benefits of Business / Technology composite services

A common service request / engagement / demand management approach is

important across Business & IT Services – ultimately the business wants to buy

“business services” – IT Services are predominately enablers

There is a tendency to want to Verticalize Service stacks – this may achieve short

term efficiencies – but these will be more than offset by loss of flexibility /

(18)

Agenda

Welcome / Introduction

Establishing Enterprise Shared Services

Enterprise Content Management Shared Service

(19)

Agenda

Welcome / Introduction

Establishing Enterprise Shared Services

Enterprise Content Management Shared Service

References

Related documents