• No results found

Bio-compartmentalization of microRNAs in exosomes during gestational diabetes mellitus

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Bio-compartmentalization of microRNAs in exosomes during gestational diabetes mellitus"

Copied!
26
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Accepted Manuscript

Bio-compartmentalization of microRNAs in exosomes during gestational diabetes mellitus

Juvita Delancy Iljas, Dominic Guanzon, Omar Elfeky, Gregory E. Rice, Carlos Salomon

PII: S0143-4004(16)30648-8 DOI: 10.1016/j.placenta.2016.12.002 Reference: YPLAC 3515

To appear in: Placenta

Received Date: 7 November 2016 Revised Date: 27 November 2016 Accepted Date: 2 December 2016

Please cite this article as: Iljas JD, Guanzon D, Elfeky O, Rice GE, Salomon C,

Bio-compartmentalization of microRNAs in exosomes during gestational diabetes mellitus, Placenta (2017), doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2016.12.002.

This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

(2)

M

AN

US

CR

IP

T

AC

CE

PT

ED

Bio-compartmentalization of microRNAs in exosomes during gestational diabetes mellitus

1

2

3

1

Juvita Delancy Iljas, 1Dominic Guanzon, 1Omar Elfeky, 1,2Gregory E. Rice, 1,2Carlos

4

Salomon

5

6 1

Exosome Biology Laboratory, Centre for Clinical Diagnostics, University of Queensland

7

Centre for Clinical Research, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, The University of

8

Queensland, Brisbane QLD 4029, Australia. 2 Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of

9

Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, USA.

10

*Correspondence: Dr Carlos Salomon PhD, DMedSc, MSc, BSc

Head of the Exosome Biology Laboratory | Centre for Clinical

Diagnostics | UQ Centre for Clinical Research | The University of

Queensland | Building 71/918 | Royal Brisbane Hospital | Herston

QLD 4029 | Faculty of Health Sciences | University of Queensland

Phone: +61 7 33465500 | Fax: +61 7 3346 5509 |

Email:[email protected] | Web: www.uqccr.uq.edu.au/

.

(3)

M

AN

US

CR

IP

T

AC

CE

PT

ED

Abstract 12 13

Analysis of the human genome revealed that only 1.2% encoded for proteins, which raised

14

questions regarding the biological significance of the remaining genome. We now know that

15

approximately 80% of the genome serves at least one biochemical function within the cell. A

16

portion of this 80% consists of a family of non-coding regulatory RNAs, one important

17

member being microRNAs (miRNAs). miRNAs can be detected in tissues and biofluids,

18

where miRNAs in the latter can be bound to proteins or encapsulated within lipid vesicles

19

such as exosomes. Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a complication of pregnancy,

20

which has harmful health impacts on both the fetus as well as the mother. The incidence of

21

GDM worldwide varies, but reached 18% in the HAPO cohort using the new International

22

Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) criteria. Not only has GDM

23

been associated with increased risks of further complications during pregnancy, but also pose

24

long-term risks for both the mother and the baby. Thus, understanding the pathophysiology of

25

GDM is important from a public health perspective. Literature has demonstrated that GDM is

26

associated with elevated levels of circulating exosomes in maternal circulation. However,

27

there is a paucity of data defining the expression, role, and diagnostic utility of miRNAs

28

in GDM. This review briefly summarizes recent advances in the function and quantification

29

of intracellular and extracellular miRNAs in GDM.

30

31

32

(4)

M

AN

US

CR

IP

T

AC

CE

PT

ED

Introduction 34 35

During normal pregnancy, glucose intolerance gradually increases during the second and third

36

trimesters of pregnancy to ensure adequate nutrient supply for the fetus [1]. A pregnant

37

mother with acquired or chronic insulin resistance is not able to compensate for the increased

38

circulating glucose concentrations due to β-cell dysfunction. The resulting maternal

39

hyperglycaemia increases the risk of disease for both the mother and her offspring. Therefore,

40

any degree of abnormal glucose metabolism diagnosed during pregnancy is termed

41

gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).

42

GDM accounts for 90% of hyperglycaemic complications of pregnancy, affects 3-8%

43

of all pregnancies and has a recurrence rate of 35-80% [1]. GDM can lead to morbidity and

44

mortality in both the mother and the infant, which includes pre-eclampsia, subsequent

45

development of diabetes mellitus type 2 (DM2) in the mother, fetal macrosomia, congenital

46

malformation, perinatal mortality and obesity [2].

47

Due to the comorbidities and risks associated with GDM pregnancies, it has become

48

apparent that screening in the first trimester or early-second trimester of pregnancy is critical

49

in metabolic disorders such as GDM [3]. Early diagnosis is essential in reducing GDM

50

associated complications for both the mother and the fetus, by implementing treatments which

51

normalize blood glucose levels. However, the current two-step approach screening method

52

based on plasma glucose measurement identify women at a later stage of GDM (24-28 weeks

53

of gestation) [4]. This means that treatment cannot start until 32 weeks of gestation, which

54

already presents a high risk of fetal morbidity and mortality. Consequently, many researchers

55

are investigating potential biomarkers present in the blood to accurately diagnose GDM

56

earlier than 24-28 weeks (e.g. 16-19 weeks of gestation) [5]. microRNAs (miRNAs) show

(5)

M

AN

US

CR

IP

T

AC

CE

PT

ED

great potential as early-trimester biomarkers for GDM, as they are highly stable in body fluids

58

and are accessible from maternal fluids throughout gestation [6].

59

Dysregulation of miRNA expression has been associated with metabolic disorders in

60

insulin secreted as well as insulin-targeted tissues and cells [7]. Furthermore, miRNAs have

61

been associated with GDM and its resulting health complications [8, 9]. Research in miRNA

62

profiling will provide valuable information in identifying unique and sensitive biomarkers in

63

body fluids to utilize as diagnostics or therapeutics in GDM. This can prevent adverse

64

pregnancy outcomes and reduce healthcare costs associated with GDM. This review aims to

65

provide an overview of recent advances in extracellular and intracellular miRNAs involved in

66

GDM pathogenesis.

67

68

miRNA biogenesis and function

69

70

Biogenesis:

71

miRNAs are small non-coding RNA fragments approximately 22 nucleotides in length [10].

72

In the initial stage of miRNA biogenesis, intergenic regions and introns where miRNAs

73

reside, are transcribed by RNA polymerase II and III [11, 12]. This produces a long transcript

74

called primary miRNA (pri-miRNA) that is greater than 70 nucleotides in length [13]. Within

75

the nucleus, this pri-miRNA folds into a structure containing a stem-loop with single stranded

76

5’ and 3’ RNA ends. The proteins Drosha and its cofactor DGRC8 bind and cleave the

pri-77

miRNA at the stem-loop base, discarding the single stranded RNA ends [14, 15].

78

Subsequently, this stem loop structure (termed a pre-miRNA) is exported into the cytoplasm

79

by exportin 5 [16].

80

Within the cytoplasm, the pre-miRNA is further processed by protein Dicer, cleaving

81

the terminal loop [17]. The remaining double stranded RNA is loaded into a multi-protein

(6)

M

AN

US

CR

IP

T

AC

CE

PT

ED

complex called RNA induced silencing complex (RISC). At the heart of RISC are the

83

argonaute proteins, that unwind the double stranded RNA [18]. During this process one RNA

84

strand is removed (passenger strand), while the other RNA strand (guide strand) remains

85

within the RISC [19]. This completes the biogenesis pathway for miRNAs, as this guide

86

strand is now the mature miRNA. This miRNA-RISC complex now has the capacity to

87

epigenetically regulate gene expression.

88

89

Function:

90

The miRNA-RISC regulates gene expression by binding to the 3’ end of the messenger RNA

91

(mRNA) and regulates its translation. Although not fully understood, this miRNA-RISC is

92

hypothesized to regulate translation by two processes [20]: (1) miRNA-RISC obstructs the

93

binding of ribosomes to the mRNA [21] and (2) deadenylation and decapping of the mRNA

94

rendering the mRNA unstable, promoting its decay [22]. Ultimately, these two approaches

95

suppress translation resulting in a decrease of protein output. In rare situations, there are some

96

miRNAs that enhance translation. An example of this is miRNA miR-10a that promotes the

97

translation of ribosomal mRNA [23]. Orom et al. (2008) speculated that this miRNA

98

competes with a negative regulator that suppresses translation of ribosomal mRNA.

99

The ability of miRNAs to recognize and bind to mRNA is primarily determined by its

100

seed region, located at nucleotide positions 2 to 7 from the 5’ end of the miRNA strand [24].

101

It has been predicted that a single miRNA can regulate more than 200 different mRNA

102

species [25]. Furthermore, it has been hypothesized that greater than 60% of genes are

103

regulated by miRNAs. Consequently, miRNAs are critically involved in regulating many

104

biological processes [26]. This makes miRNAs attractive as biomarkers or therapeutic targets,

105

as dysregulation of miRNA expression has been linked to several diseases such as cancer and

106

diabetes mellitus (DM) [27].

(7)

M

AN

US

CR

IP

T

AC

CE

PT

ED

108 Quantifying miRNAs 109 110

There are limitations regarding miRNA detection due to inefficient RNA isolation, serum or

111

plasma contamination by haemolysis, variable reverse transcription (RT) and polymerase

112

chain reaction (PCR) efficiencies, inconsistent reference genes and the existence of different

113

qPCR platforms [28]. It is still a challenge to collect and quantify extracellular miRNAs. This

114

is due to the low concentration present in body fluids, the difficulty distinguishing between

115

mature and immature miRNA and the presence of miRNA isoforms.

116

Currently, the most sensitive, reproducible and gold standard method to quantify

117

miRNAs is quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) [29]. qRT-PCR involves RT of miRNA

118

into cDNA, before amplification and detection with specific probes. Advances have been

119

made in detecting low amounts of miRNA in the range of approximately 7 fM [30], which is

120

superior to other qRT-PCR based technologies. Subsequently, high-throughput qRT-PCR

121

platforms were developed to allow rapid miRNA profiling of a large number of samples [31].

122

The most commonly used qRT-PCR miRNA expression profiling method is TaqMan

low-123

density array (TLDA), which is both cost-effective and high-throughput. This TLDA

124

technology has been utilized to profile miRNAs within serum isolated from GDM patients

125

(Table 1) [32].

126

Microarrays are a technology based on the hybridization of cDNA to DNA probes

127

[28]. The approach is limited by low sensitivity, high RNA input requirement (100 ng to 1µg),

128

and suffers from background and cross-hybridization when compared to qRT-PCR.

129

Therefore, microarrays are not ideal for miRNA profiling, since they cannot detect highly

130

expressed miRNAs (due to signal over saturation) or distinguish between mature and

(8)

M

AN

US

CR

IP

T

AC

CE

PT

ED

immature miRNAs. Nevertheless, microarrays have been used as a discovery tool to identify

132

miRNAs that are differentially expressed between GDM and normal controls [33, 34].

133

Next generation sequencing technology (NGS) has the advantage over other

134

technologies, as it can identify novel miRNAs and other small RNA species [35]. NGS is

135

more laborious than qRT-PCR and microarrays and requires a larger amount of RNA input

136

(500 ng to 5 µg). It is possible to barcode multiple samples and sequence them simultaneously

137

thereby reducing the costs and time. miRNA databases and bioinformatics tools are available

138

that provide information on miRNA sequences, miRNA-mRNA target interactions, and the

139

involvement of miRNAs in biological as well as pathological processes. NGS was utilized to

140

identify differentially expressed miRNAs in GDM compared to normal pregnancies (Table 1)

141

[36].

142

In summary, qRT-PCR is ideal for low input RNA, NGS technologies for

143

identification of novel miRNAs, and microarrays (low sensitivity) along with NGS (high

144

sensitivity) is utilised to screen for differentially expressed miRNAs in a large set of samples.

145

Several researchers have compared these three technologies for miRNA quantification and

146

concluded that each technology has its own strengths and weaknesses [37]. Deciding on

147

which technology to use for miRNA quantification and profiling depends on the experimental

148

design and its goals.

149

150

Extracellular and intracellular miRNAs during normal and GDM pregnancies

151

152

Extracellular miRNAs present in body fluids can be located within extracellular vesicles

153

(EVs) (exosomes, microvesicles and apoptotic bodies [38]), bound to protein complexes (such

154

as argonaute2 complexes [39]) or within high-density lipoproteins (HDL) [40]. These

155

structures protect extracellular miRNAs from degradation, rendering them very stable in

(9)

M

AN

US

CR

IP

T

AC

CE

PT

ED

biological fluids. Therefore, miRNAs are exciting candidates for biomarkers [41, 42]. Recent

157

studies have produced promising results on the potential of extracellular miRNAs in blood

158

(termed circulating miRNAs) as biomarkers that may be useful in the diagnosis of GDM (see

159

Figure 1) [43].

160

The literature showed extensive studies of miRNAs in DM1 and DM2, but studies into

161

their role in GDM is lacking. There have only been 6 studies investigating miRNAs in GDM,

162

only 2 of which specifically investigate extracellular miRNAs within the blood (see Table 1)

163

[32, 36]. A study by Zhao et al. (2011) reported that miR-132, miR-29a and miR-222 are

164

decreased in serum of women with GDM [32]. A second study by Zhu et al. (2015) reported

165

that hsa-miR-16-5p, hsa-miR-17-5p, hsa-miR-19a-3p, hsa-miR-19b-3p and hsa-miR-20a-5p

166

are increased in the plasma of women with GDM [36]. There is no apparent correlation

167

between these two studies with respect to the miRNAs detected.

168

Four other studies investigated intracellular miRNAs in GDM (see Table 1) [33, 34,

169

44, 45]. Interestingly, the studies by Zhao et al. (2011) and Shi et al. (2014) share one miRNA

170

in common, which is miR-222 [32, 33]. However, the expression of miR-222 is not consistent

171

between the two studies. Zhao et al. (2011) reported that miR-222 is supressed in GDM,

172

while Shi et al. (2014) demonstrated that miR-222 was upregulated in GDM. One potential

173

reason for this inconsistency is that different tissue types were analysed, namely serum and

174

omental adipose tissue [32, 33].

175

Clearly, there is a lack of data regarding the expression of miRNAs in pregnancies

176

complicated by GDM. However, parallels can be drawn between GDM and DM. Collares et

177

al. (2013) investigated the differences and similarities between DM1, DM2 and GDM in 178

peripheral blood mononuclear cells [46]. These investigators found 9 miRNAs: hsa-miR-126,

179

1307, 142-3p, 142-5p, 144, 199a-5p,

hsa-miR-180

27a, hsa-miR-29b and hsa-miR-342-3p that were shared in DM1, DM2 and GDM.

(10)

M

AN

US

CR

IP

T

AC

CE

PT

ED

Interestingly, miR-27a and miR-29b (a miRNA sharing sequence composition to

hsa-182

miR-29a) was also detected in GDM as observed by Li et al. (2015) and Zhao et al. (2011)

183

[32, 34]. Furthermore, Collares et al. (2013) reported that miR-222 is specific to DM2. This

184

miRNA has also been identified in GDM studies [32, 33], contradicting this observation by

185

Collares et al. (2013) [46]. Nevertheless, miR-222 seems to be closely linked to DM2 and

186

GDM pathology.

187

In addition, research detecting an increase of this miRNA within plasma of patients

188

with DM2 further supports the previous studies investigating miR-222 [47, 48]. However, a

189

study investigating miR-222 in plasma microparticles concluded that there was no difference

190

between DM2 and normal controls [49]. A majority of studies have found miR-222

191

differentially expressed in plasma between normal and GDM/DM2 patients [32, 46-48].

192

Consequently, this suggests that miR-222 is not located within microparticles, but within

193

other lipid vesicle subtypes or bound to protein complexes within blood. This miRNA

miR-194

222 has been heavily investigated in cancer and has been demonstrated to regulate Kip1, a

195

protein required for cell cycle entry and growth factor stimulation [50].

196

With regards to GDM, miR-222 has been shown to directly target the 3’ untranslated

197

region of ERα, a protein involved in regulating GLUT4 expression [33, 51]. Shi et al. (2011)

198

further demonstrated that silencing of miR-222 caused an increase of ERα and GLUT4

199

expression. Finally, insulin stimulation in miR-222 silenced cells caused an increase in

200

GLUT4 translocation from the cytoplasm to the plasma membrane, suggesting enhanced

201

glucose uptake [33]. This is very interesting as it means that cells with accumulated miR-222

202

would be less receptive to insulin stimulation. Perhaps this increase in intracellular miR-222

203

can be detected in blood, as demonstrated in the previous studies in DM [46-48]. However,

204

Zhao et al. (2011) found that miR-222 is decreased in serum of patients with GDM [32].

205

Further investigations are needed to understand the role of miR-222 in GDM.

(11)

M

AN

US

CR

IP

T

AC

CE

PT

ED

A study performing a meta-analysis on the current literature for miRNAs and DM has

207

identified a range of circulating and tissue specific miRNAs [52]. Interestingly, miR-29a,

208

miR-19b, miR-132, miR-16 and miR-20b were differentially expressed in DM, corroborating

209

with studies in GDM (see Table 1) [32, 52]. Another study identifies 29, 19a,

miR-210

33a being involved in the insulin signalling pathway [53]. These miRNAs are also

211

differentially expressed in GDM, thus are attractive therapeutic targets [34, 36, 45]. Finally,

212

miR-103 and miR-107 have been closely connected to insulin sensitivity [54]. This previous

213

study led to the development of a GalNac-conjugated anti-miR, targeting 103 and

miR-214

107 (called RG-125) by the company Regulus™. RG-125 is currently undergoing phase 1

215

study in humans for the treatment of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis in patients with DM2. This

216

study shows the potential for miRNAs to be used as therapeutics for metabolic disorders, such

217

as GDM.

218

219

What are exosomes?

220

221

Exosomes are a member of the EVs and originate from the endosomal compartment by the

222

fusion of multivesicular bodies with the plasma membrane [55]. Exosomes are bi-layered

223

lipid vesicles between 40 to 120 nm in diameter, are secreted by multiple cell types, and are

224

key players in many biological functions. Furthermore, exosomes contain both RNA

225

(primarily miRNA) and protein. These secreted exosomes are involved in cell-to-cell

226

communication by delivering their cargo into recipient cells. Furthermore, these secreted

227

exosomes can be isolated from conditioned medium and body fluids (e.g. plasma, saliva,

228

urine). Exosome isolation involves several steps including ultracentrifugation, ultrafiltration

229

and separation by density gradient [56]. Centrifugation coupled with ultrafiltration can further

230

enrich for exosomes by separating vesicles based on their size. Specifically, larger vesicles

(12)

M

AN

US

CR

IP

T

AC

CE

PT

ED

such as apoptotic bodies and microvesicles can be separated from smaller vesicles such as

232

exosomes using a 0.22µm filter [57]. Additionally, exosomes can be further purified by

233

density using sucrose and iodixanol gradients. Another exosome isolation method mentioned

234

in the literature is immunoisolation using magnetic beads coated with specific antibodies

235

against exosomal proteins [58]. However, capturing exosomes with a specific exosomal

236

antibody can be limiting when an exosome does not possess the certain marker. Furthermore,

237

a microfluidic device has also been used for separation of exosomes from serum using

micro-238

channels [59]. Different exosome isolation techniques were also applied to obtain exosomes

239

in GDM patients (Table 2).

240

It is important to note that EVs are a heterogeneous group. Its nomenclature is

241

constantly being redefined by the scientific community [60]. A strict separation between the

242

different vesicle types by size or biogenesis has not been established. There is still no

243

agreement on markers (e.g. CD63, Hsp70, CD9 for exosomes) that can distinguish the

244

different type of vesicles by its origin once they leave the cell. Furthermore, Thery et al.

245

(2006) has investigated various exosome isolation techniques and concluded that each

246

isolation technique lead to different yields and purities of the sample [58]. Therefore, these

247

differences in methodologies can result in inconsistencies within downstream protein and

248

RNA analyses. Consequently, in the growing interest of EVs as a diagnostic tool,

249

standardization in EV isolation and analysis methodologies are required.

250

251

Exosomal miRNAs during GDM pregnancies

252

253

Dysregulation of miRNA expression has been linked with metabolic disorders, such as DM2

254

and dyslipidaemia [61]. Consequently, the miRNA population within exosomes can be

255

profiled and used as biomarkers for diseases such as GDM [62]. Consistent with this proposal,

(13)

M

AN

US

CR

IP

T

AC

CE

PT

ED

trophoblast/cytotrophoblast derived exosomes have been used to define fetal-maternal

257

interaction [63, 64] as well as placental dysfunction [65], which is important in GDM

258

pathogenesis.

259

Research into GDM and exosomes is still formative, with only 6 studies specifically

260

focused on exosomes and GDM pathogenesis (see Table 2). Sarker et al. (2014), Salomon et

261

al. (2016) and Nardi et al. (2016) observed an increase in exosome concentration in the 262

maternal plasma of first trimester pregnant women. Furthermore, exosome concentrations

263

correlated with gestational age [66-69], while the release of trophoblast-derived exosomes

264

decreased dramatically in the third trimester [67]. Rice et al. (2015) established a link

265

between increased exosome concentration and GDM by defining the effects of glucose

266

concentration on exosome release and bioactivity [70]. They reported that high glucose

267

concentrations increased the release of exosomes from first-trimester trophoblast cells and the

268

capacity of exosomes to induce the release of cytokine mediators from target cells.

269

A subsequent study by Salomon et al. (2016), reported the differential release of

pro-270

inflammatory cytokines (GM-CSF, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IFN-y and TNF-α) from endothelial cells

271

when treated with placental exosomes derived from women with GDM [68]. These data

272

warrant further investigation to elucidate the intracellular mechanisms by which glucose

273

regulates exosome biogenesis, packaging and bioactivity, and how this contributes to the

274

aetiology and progression of GDM.

275

Further research is necessary to identify miRNAs specific for GDM in placental or

276

maternal derived exosomes in blood. It is known that the chromosome 19 miRNA cluster

277

(C19MC) is exclusively expressed in the placenta [64]. Recently, Almohammadi et al. (2016)

278

identified that the abundance of miR-518a-5p, miR-518b, miR-518c, miR-518e, miR-520c-3p

279

and miR-525-5p (members of the C19MC region) in placental exosomes isolated from

280

women with GDM is increased when compared to women with normal pregnancies [71].

(14)

M

AN

US

CR

IP

T

AC

CE

PT

ED

Furthermore, Donker et al. (2012) also investigated the expression C19MC region under

282

placental hypoxia, which is implicated in fetal growth restriction [64]. Donker et al. (2012)

283

found that the C19MC miRNA region is not differentially expressed in placenta hypoxia

284

compared to control, but did observe a downregulation of miR-520c-3p. Furthermore, this

285

miRNA was found to be elevated within maternal plasma of GDM patients. These

286

aforementioned results suggests a role of miR-520c-3p in placental oxygen supply [71].

287

However, the role of the entire C19MC region in GDM pathogenesis remains to be

288 elucidated. 289 290 Conclusion 291 292

The early diagnosis of GDM during the first trimester of pregnancy is critical in preventing

293

complications for both the mother and the fetus. Current diagnostic methods fail to identify

294

GDM early, which leads to the urgent need of research and development for new diagnostic

295

tools. The measurement of extracellular miRNAs encapsulated in exosomes within blood

296

holds great promise as a reliable and accurate diagnostic tool for GDM. Using methods such

297

as qRT-PCR and NGS, these extracellular miRNAs have been demonstrated to be

298

differentially expressed in women with GDM. Currently, research into exosomal miRNAs in

299

GDM has not been sufficient. In addition, there is no apparent correlation between studies

300

investigating extracellular miRNAs and GDM. Therefore, additional research is required to

301

understand the role of exosomes and extracellular miRNA in GDM, how these contribute to

302

the aetiology of GDM, and the potential for using exosomes and extracellular miRNAs as

303

interventions for GDM.

304

(15)

M

AN

US

CR

IP

T

AC

CE

PT

ED

Acknowledgements 306 307

This review was generated as part of the Queensland Perinatal Consortium Inaugural

308

Conference held on July 15th 2016 in Brisbane, Queensland Australia. The conference was

309

supported by an Intra-Faculty Collaborative Workshop grant from the Faculty of Medicine

310

and Biomedical Sciences, The University of Queensland. CS holds a Lions Medical Research

311

Foundation Fellowship.

(16)

M

AN

US

CR

IP

T

AC

CE

PT

ED

References 313 314

[1] B.E. Metzger, T.A. Buchanan, D.R. Coustan, A. de Leiva, D.B. Dunger, D.R. Hadden, M. 315

Hod, J.L. Kitzmiller, S.L. Kjos, J.N. Oats, D.J. Pettitt, D.A. Sacks, C. Zoupas, Summary and 316

recommendations of the Fifth International Workshop-Conference on Gestational 317

Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetes Care 30 Suppl 2 (2007) S251-60. 318

[2] A. Ornoy, E.A. Reece, G. Pavlinkova, C. Kappen, R.K. Miller, Effect of maternal diabetes 319

on the embryo, fetus, and children: congenital anomalies, genetic and epigenetic changes 320

and developmental outcomes, Birth Defects Res. C. Embryo Today 105(1) (2015) 53-72. 321

[3] A. Sweeting, F. Park, J. Hyett, The first trimester: prediction and prevention of the 322

great obstetrical syndromes, Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 29(2) (2015) 183-323

93. 324

[4] P.R. Rani, J. Begum, Screening and Diagnosis of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus, Where 325

Do We Stand, J Clin Diagn Res 10(4) (2016) Qe01-4. 326

[5] S. O'Neill, M. Bohl, S. Gregersen, K. Hermansen, L. O'Driscoll, Blood-Based Biomarkers 327

for Metabolic Syndrome, Trends Endocrinol Metab 27(6) (2016) 363-74. 328

[6] A. Turchinovich, L. Weiz, B. Burwinkel, Extracellular miRNAs: the mystery of their 329

origin and function, Trends Biochem. Sci. 37(11) (2012) 460-5. 330

[7] C. Guay, E. Roggli, V. Nesca, C. Jacovetti, R. Regazzi, Diabetes mellitus, a microRNA-331

related disease?, Translational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine 332

157(4) (2011) 253-64. 333

[8] G. Rahimi, N. Jafari, M. Khodabakhsh, Z. Shirzad, H.P. Dogaheh, Upregulation of 334

microRNA processing enzymes Drosha and Dicer in gestational diabetes mellitus, 335

Gynecological endocrinology : the official journal of the International Society of 336

Gynecological Endocrinology 31(2) (2015) 156-9. 337

[9] M.D. Mitchell, H.N. Peiris, M. Kobayashi, Y.Q. Koh, G. Duncombe, S.E. Illanes, G.E. Rice, 338

C. Salomon, Placental exosomes in normal and complicated pregnancy, Am J Obstet 339

Gynecol 213(4 Suppl) (2015) S173-81. 340

[10] M. Ha, V.N. Kim, Regulation of microRNA biogenesis, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 15(8) 341

(2014) 509-24. 342

[11] G.M. Borchert, W. Lanier, B.L. Davidson, RNA polymerase III transcribes human 343

microRNAs, Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 13(12) (2006) 1097-101. 344

[12] X. Cai, C.H. Hagedorn, B.R. Cullen, Human microRNAs are processed from capped, 345

polyadenylated transcripts that can also function as mRNAs, RNA 10(12) (2004) 1957-346

66. 347

[13] Y. Lee, K. Jeon, J.T. Lee, S. Kim, V.N. Kim, MicroRNA maturation: stepwise processing 348

and subcellular localization, EMBO J. 21(17) (2002) 4663-70. 349

[14] Y. Lee, C. Ahn, J. Han, H. Choi, J. Kim, J. Yim, J. Lee, P. Provost, O. Radmark, S. Kim, 350

V.N. Kim, The nuclear RNase III Drosha initiates microRNA processing, Nature 351

425(6956) (2003) 415-9. 352

[15] M. Landthaler, A. Yalcin, T. Tuschl, The human DiGeorge syndrome critical region 353

gene 8 and Its D. melanogaster homolog are required for miRNA biogenesis, Curr. Biol. 354

14(23) (2004) 2162-7. 355

[16] M.T. Bohnsack, K. Czaplinski, D. Gorlich, Exportin 5 is a RanGTP-dependent dsRNA-356

binding protein that mediates nuclear export of pre-miRNAs, RNA 10(2) (2004) 185-91. 357

(17)

M

AN

US

CR

IP

T

AC

CE

PT

ED

[17] Y.S. Lee, K. Nakahara, J.W. Pham, K. Kim, Z. He, E.J. Sontheimer, R.W. Carthew, 358

Distinct roles for Drosophila Dicer-1 and Dicer-2 in the siRNA/miRNA silencing 359

pathways, Cell 117(1) (2004) 69-81. 360

[18] A.J. Pratt, I.J. MacRae, The RNA-induced silencing complex: a versatile gene-361

silencing machine, J. Biol. Chem. 284(27) (2009) 17897-901. 362

[19] T. Kawamata, H. Seitz, Y. Tomari, Structural determinants of miRNAs for RISC 363

loading and slicer-independent unwinding, Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 16(9) (2009) 953-60. 364

[20] A. Wilczynska, M. Bushell, The complexity of miRNA-mediated repression, Cell 365

Death Differ. 22(1) (2015) 22-33. 366

[21] G. Mathonnet, M.R. Fabian, Y.V. Svitkin, A. Parsyan, L. Huck, T. Murata, S. Biffo, W.C. 367

Merrick, E. Darzynkiewicz, R.S. Pillai, W. Filipowicz, T.F. Duchaine, N. Sonenberg, 368

MicroRNA inhibition of translation initiation in vitro by targeting the cap-binding 369

complex eIF4F, Science 317(5845) (2007) 1764-7. 370

[22] A. Eulalio, E. Huntzinger, T. Nishihara, J. Rehwinkel, M. Fauser, E. Izaurralde, 371

Deadenylation is a widespread effect of miRNA regulation, RNA 15(1) (2009) 21-32. 372

[23] U.A. Orom, F.C. Nielsen, A.H. Lund, MicroRNA-10a binds the 5'UTR of ribosomal 373

protein mRNAs and enhances their translation, Mol. Cell 30(4) (2008) 460-71. 374

[24] R.C. Friedman, K.K. Farh, C.B. Burge, D.P. Bartel, Most mammalian mRNAs are 375

conserved targets of microRNAs, Genome Res. 19(1) (2009) 92-105. 376

[25] D. Baek, J. Villen, C. Shin, F.D. Camargo, S.P. Gygi, D.P. Bartel, The impact of 377

microRNAs on protein output, Nature 455(7209) (2008) 64-71. 378

[26] K.V. Morris, J.S. Mattick, The rise of regulatory RNA, Nat. Rev. Genet. 15(6) (2014) 379

423-37. 380

[27] C. Guay, R. Regazzi, Circulating microRNAs as novel biomarkers for diabetes 381

mellitus, Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 9(9) (2013) 513-21. 382

[28] A. Hrustincova, H. Votavova, M. Dostalova Merkerova, Circulating MicroRNAs: 383

Methodological Aspects in Detection of These Biomarkers, Folia biologica 61(6) (2015) 384

203-18. 385

[29] T.D. Schmittgen, E.J. Lee, J. Jiang, A. Sarkar, L. Yang, T.S. Elton, C. Chen, Real-time 386

PCR quantification of precursor and mature microRNA, Methods 44(1) (2008) 31-8. 387

[30] W. Lv, J. Zhao, B. Situ, B. Li, W. Ma, J. Liu, Z. Wu, W. Wang, X. Yan, L. Zheng, A target-388

triggered dual amplification strategy for sensitive detection of microRNA, Biosens. 389

Bioelectron. 83 (2016) 250-5. 390

[31] D.A. Baldwin, A.D. Horan, P.J. Hesketh, S. Mehta, Combined RT-qPCR of mRNA and 391

microRNA Targets within One Fluidigm Integrated Fluidic Circuit, J. Biomol. Tech. 392

(2016). 393

[32] C. Zhao, J. Dong, T. Jiang, Z. Shi, B. Yu, Y. Zhu, D. Chen, J. Xu, R. Huo, J. Dai, Y. Xia, S. 394

Pan, Z. Hu, J. Sha, Early second-trimester serum miRNA profiling predicts gestational 395

diabetes mellitus, PloS one 6(8) (2011) e23925. 396

[33] Z. Shi, C. Zhao, X. Guo, H. Ding, Y. Cui, R. Shen, J. Liu, Differential expression of 397

microRNAs in omental adipose tissue from gestational diabetes mellitus subjects reveals 398

miR-222 as a regulator of ERalpha expression in estrogen-induced insulin resistance, 399

Endocrinology 155(5) (2014) 1982-90. 400

[34] J. Li, L. Song, L. Zhou, J. Wu, C. Sheng, H. Chen, Y. Liu, S. Gao, W. Huang, A MicroRNA 401

Signature in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Associated with Risk of Macrosomia, Cellular 402

physiology and biochemistry : international journal of experimental cellular physiology, 403

biochemistry, and pharmacology 37(1) (2015) 243-52. 404

[35] B.G. Dedeoglu, High-throughput approaches for microRNA expression analysis, 405

Methods Mol. Biol. 1107 (2014) 91-103. 406

(18)

M

AN

US

CR

IP

T

AC

CE

PT

ED

[36] Y. Zhu, F. Tian, H. Li, Y. Zhou, J. Lu, Q. Ge, Profiling maternal plasma microRNA 407

expression in early pregnancy to predict gestational diabetes mellitus, International 408

journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation 409

of Gynaecology and Obstetrics 130(1) (2015) 49-53. 410

[37] A. Git, H. Dvinge, M. Salmon-Divon, M. Osborne, C. Kutter, J. Hadfield, P. Bertone, C. 411

Caldas, Systematic comparison of microarray profiling, real-time PCR, and next-412

generation sequencing technologies for measuring differential microRNA expression, 413

RNA 16(5) (2010) 991-1006. 414

[38] E.L.A. S, I. Mager, X.O. Breakefield, M.J. Wood, Extracellular vesicles: biology and 415

emerging therapeutic opportunities, Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 12(5) (2013) 347-57. 416

[39] J.D. Arroyo, J.R. Chevillet, E.M. Kroh, I.K. Ruf, C.C. Pritchard, D.F. Gibson, P.S. Mitchell, 417

C.F. Bennett, E.L. Pogosova-Agadjanyan, D.L. Stirewalt, J.F. Tait, M. Tewari, Argonaute2 418

complexes carry a population of circulating microRNAs independent of vesicles in 419

human plasma, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 108(12) (2011) 5003-8. 420

[40] K.C. Vickers, B.T. Palmisano, B.M. Shoucri, R.D. Shamburek, A.T. Remaley, 421

MicroRNAs are transported in plasma and delivered to recipient cells by high-density 422

lipoproteins, Nat. Cell Biol. 13(4) (2011) 423-33. 423

[41] H. Ishikawa, H. Yamada, N. Taromaru, K. Kondo, A. Nagura, M. Yamazaki, Y. Ando, E. 424

Munetsuna, K. Suzuki, K. Ohashi, R. Teradaira, Stability of serum high-density 425

lipoprotein-microRNAs for preanalytical conditions, Ann. Clin. Biochem. (2016). 426

[42] Q. Ge, Y. Zhou, J. Lu, Y. Bai, X. Xie, Z. Lu, miRNA in plasma exosome is stable under 427

different storage conditions, Molecules 19(2) (2014) 1568-75. 428

[43] N. Pillar, L. Yoffe, M. Hod, N. Shomron, The possible involvement of microRNAs in 429

preeclampsia and gestational diabetes mellitus, Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 430

29(2) (2015) 176-82. 431

[44] I. Floris, B. Descamps, A. Vardeu, T. Mitic, A.M. Posadino, S. Shantikumar, G. Sala-432

Newby, G. Capobianco, G. Mangialardi, L. Howard, S. Dessole, R. Urrutia, G. Pintus, C. 433

Emanueli, Gestational diabetes mellitus impairs fetal endothelial cell functions through a 434

mechanism involving microRNA-101 and histone methyltransferase enhancer of zester 435

homolog-2, Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology 35(3) (2015) 664-74. 436

[45] C. Zhao, T. Zhang, Z. Shi, H. Ding, X. Ling, MicroRNA-518d regulates PPARalpha 437

protein expression in the placentas of females with gestational diabetes mellitus, 438

Molecular medicine reports 9(6) (2014) 2085-90. 439

[46] C.V. Collares, A.F. Evangelista, D.J. Xavier, D.M. Rassi, T. Arns, M.C. Foss-Freitas, M.C. 440

Foss, D. Puthier, E.T. Sakamoto-Hojo, G.A. Passos, E.A. Donadi, Identifying common and 441

specific microRNAs expressed in peripheral blood mononuclear cell of type 1, type 2, 442

and gestational diabetes mellitus patients, BMC research notes 6 (2013) 491. 443

[47] F.J. Ortega, J.M. Mercader, V. Catalan, J.M. Moreno-Navarrete, N. Pueyo, M. Sabater, J. 444

Gomez-Ambrosi, R. Anglada, J.A. Fernandez-Formoso, W. Ricart, G. Fruhbeck, J.M. 445

Fernandez-Real, Targeting the circulating microRNA signature of obesity, Clin. Chem. 446

59(5) (2013) 781-92. 447

[48] F.J. Ortega, J.M. Mercader, J.M. Moreno-Navarrete, O. Rovira, E. Guerra, E. Esteve, G. 448

Xifra, C. Martinez, W. Ricart, J. Rieusset, S. Rome, M. Karczewska-Kupczewska, M. 449

Straczkowski, J.M. Fernandez-Real, Profiling of circulating microRNAs reveals common 450

microRNAs linked to type 2 diabetes that change with insulin sensitization, Diabetes 451

Care 37(5) (2014) 1375-83. 452

[49] F. Jansen, H. Wang, D. Przybilla, B.S. Franklin, A. Dolf, P. Pfeifer, T. Schmitz, A. 453

Flender, E. Endl, G. Nickenig, N. Werner, Vascular endothelial microparticles-454

(19)

M

AN

US

CR

IP

T

AC

CE

PT

ED

incorporated microRNAs are altered in patients with diabetes mellitus, Cardiovasc. 455

Diabetol. 15 (2016) 49. 456

[50] J. Matsuzaki, H. Suzuki, Role of MicroRNAs-221/222 in Digestive Systems, J Clin 457

Med 4(8) (2015) 1566-77. 458

[51] P. Garrido, J. Moran, A. Alonso, S. Gonzalez, C. Gonzalez, 17beta-estradiol activates 459

glucose uptake via GLUT4 translocation and PI3K/Akt signaling pathway in MCF-7 cells, 460

Endocrinology 154(6) (2013) 1979-89. 461

[52] H. Zhu, S.W. Leung, Identification of microRNA biomarkers in type 2 diabetes: a 462

meta-analysis of controlled profiling studies, Diabetologia 58(5) (2015) 900-11. 463

[53] C. Chakraborty, C.G. Doss, S. Bandyopadhyay, G. Agoramoorthy, Influence of miRNA 464

in insulin signaling pathway and insulin resistance: micro-molecules with a major role in 465

type-2 diabetes, Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA 5(5) (2014) 697-712. 466

[54] M. Trajkovski, J. Hausser, J. Soutschek, B. Bhat, A. Akin, M. Zavolan, M.H. Heim, M. 467

Stoffel, MicroRNAs 103 and 107 regulate insulin sensitivity, Nature 474(7353) (2011) 468

649-53. 469

[55] B. Bakhshandeh, M.A. Kamaleddin, K. Aalishah, A Comprehensive Review on 470

Exosomes and Microvesicles as Epigenetic Factors, Current stem cell research & therapy 471

(2016). 472

[56] C.Y. Chen, M.C. Hogan, C.J. Ward, Purification of exosome-like vesicles from urine, 473

Methods in enzymology 524 (2013) 225-41. 474

[57] R.J. Lobb, M. Becker, S.W. Wen, C.S. Wong, A.P. Wiegmans, A. Leimgruber, A. Moller, 475

Optimized exosome isolation protocol for cell culture supernatant and human plasma, 476

Journal of extracellular vesicles 4 (2015) 27031. 477

[58] C. Thery, S. Amigorena, G. Raposo, A. Clayton, Isolation and characterization of 478

exosomes from cell culture supernatants and biological fluids, Curr Protoc Cell Biol 479

Chapter 3 (2006) Unit 3 22. 480

[59] P. Zhang, M. He, Y. Zeng, Ultrasensitive microfluidic analysis of circulating exosomes 481

using a nanostructured graphene oxide/polydopamine coating, Lab on a chip 16(16) 482

(2016) 3033-42. 483

[60] K.W. Witwer, E.I. Buzás, L.T. Bemis, A. Bora, C. Lässer, J. Lötvall, E.N. Nolte-‘t Hoen, 484

M.G. Piper, S. Sivaraman, J. Skog, C. Théry, M.H. Wauben, F. Hochberg, Standardization of 485

sample collection, isolation and analysis methods in extracellular vesicle research, 2013 486

(2013). 487

[61] D.S. Karolina, S. Tavintharan, A. Armugam, S. Sepramaniam, S.L. Pek, M.T. Wong, S.C. 488

Lim, C.F. Sum, K. Jeyaseelan, Circulating miRNA profiles in patients with metabolic 489

syndrome, J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 97(12) (2012) E2271-6. 490

[62] M.P. Hunter, N. Ismail, X. Zhang, B.D. Aguda, E.J. Lee, L. Yu, T. Xiao, J. Schafer, M.L. 491

Lee, T.D. Schmittgen, S.P. Nana-Sinkam, D. Jarjoura, C.B. Marsh, Detection of microRNA 492

expression in human peripheral blood microvesicles, PloS one 3(11) (2008) e3694. 493

[63] C. Salomon, M. Kobayashi, K. Ashman, L. Sobrevia, M.D. Mitchell, G.E. Rice, Hypoxia-494

induced changes in the bioactivity of cytotrophoblast-derived exosomes, PLoS ONE 495

8(11) (2013) e79636. 496

[64] R.B. Donker, J.F. Mouillet, T. Chu, C.A. Hubel, D.B. Stolz, A.E. Morelli, Y. Sadovsky, The 497

expression profile of C19MC microRNAs in primary human trophoblast cells and 498

exosomes, Mol. Hum. Reprod. 18(8) (2012) 417-24. 499

[65] C.A. Escudero, K. Herlitz, F. Troncoso, J. Acurio, C. Aguayo, J.M. Roberts, G. Truong, G. 500

Duncombe, G. Rice, C. Salomon, Role of Extracellular Vesicles and microRNAs on 501

Dysfunctional Angiogenesis during Preeclamptic Pregnancies, Front Physiol 7 (2016) 98. 502

(20)

M

AN

US

CR

IP

T

AC

CE

PT

ED

[66] S. Sarker, K. Scholz-Romero, A. Perez, S.E. Illanes, M.D. Mitchell, G.E. Rice, C. 503

Salomon, Placenta-derived exosomes continuously increase in maternal circulation over 504

the first trimester of pregnancy, J. Transl. Med. 12 (2014) 204. 505

[67] C. Salomon, M.J. Torres, M. Kobayashi, K. Scholz-Romero, L. Sobrevia, A. 506

Dobierzewska, S.E. Illanes, M.D. Mitchell, G.E. Rice, A gestational profile of placental 507

exosomes in maternal plasma and their effects on endothelial cell migration, PLoS ONE 508

9(6) (2014) e98667. 509

[68] C. Salomon, K. Scholz-Romero, S. Sarker, E. Sweeney, M. Kobayashi, P. Correa, S. 510

Longo, G. Duncombe, M.D. Mitchell, G.E. Rice, S.E. Illanes, Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Is 511

Associated With Changes in the Concentration and Bioactivity of Placenta-Derived 512

Exosomes in Maternal Circulation Across Gestation, Diabetes 65(3) (2016) 598-609. 513

[69] S. Nardi Fda, T.F. Michelon, J. Neumann, L.F. Manvailer, B. Wagner, P.A. Horn, G. 514

Bicalho Mda, V. Rebmann, High levels of circulating extracellular vesicles with altered 515

expression and function during pregnancy, Immunobiology 221(7) (2016) 753-60. 516

[70] G.E. Rice, K. Scholz-Romero, E. Sweeney, H. Peiris, M. Kobayashi, G. Duncombe, M.D. 517

Mitchell, C. Salomon, The Effect of Glucose on the Release and Bioactivity of Exosomes 518

From First Trimester Trophoblast Cells, J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 100(10) (2015) 519

E1280-8. 520

[71] D. Almohammadi, Joseph Casper, Omar Elfeky, Christine Chang, Katherin Scholz-521

Romero, Sherri Longo, Gregory Duncombe, Gregory Rice, C. Salomon, C19MC miRNA 522

Signatures of Placenta-Derived Exosomes in Women Diagnosed with Gestational 523

Diabetes Mellitus Endocrine Society's 98th Annual Meeting and Expo, Boston, 2016. 524

525

(21)

M

AN

US

CR

IP

T

AC

CE

PT

ED

Table 1: Tabulation of miRNAs in GDM compared to normal controls.

527 Publication Sample miRNA upregulated in GDM miRNA downregulated in GDM Detection technique

[32] Serum 132,

miR-29a, miR-222

Discovery = TaqMan low density array Validation = Real-time PCR [36] Plasma 16-5p, miR-17-5p, hsa-miR-19a-3p, 19b-3p, hsa-miR-20a-5p Discovery = Ion Torrent (Sequencing) Validation = Real-time PCR

[34] Placental tissue miR-508-3p

27a, miR-9, miR-137, 92a, miR-33a, miR-30d, miR-362-5p and miR-502-5p Discovery = Agilent Human miRNA Microarray Validation = Real-time PCR

[45] Placental tissue miR-518d Real-time PCR

[33] Omental

adipose tissue miR-222

Discovery = AFFX miRNA expression chips Validation = Real-time PCR [44] Primary

HUVEC miR-101 Real-time PCR

(22)

M

AN

US

CR

IP

T

AC

CE

PT

ED

Table 2: Exosomes and exosomal miRNAs in GDM pathogenesis

529 Publicati on Sample GDM linked pathogene sis Exosome isolation method Number of exosomes miRNA Detectio n techniq ue [71] Plasma (trophobl ast cells) To be determined Differential and buoyant density centrifugati on 518a-5p, 518b, 518c, 518e, miR-520c-3p and miR-525-5p (GDM patients vs normal pregnancy) qRT-PCR [66, 67, 69] Maternal or fetal plasma exosomes Exosomes might play a role in feto-maternal interaction and placenta developme nt [66, 67] Differential and buoyant density centrifugati on using a sucrose continuous gradient ultrafiltratio n. [69] ExoQuick™ or ultracentrifu gation Total exosome Increased 50-fold during pregnancy (pregnancy vs non-pregnant). Placental exosome number decline during pregnancy - - [68] Maternal periphera l plasma exosomes Bioactive (cytokine release) and promote cell migration. Differential and buoyant density centrifugati on using a sucrose continuous ultrafiltratio - - -

(23)

M

AN

US

CR

IP

T

AC

CE

PT

ED

530 531 [70] First trimester trophobla st cells Extracellul ar milieu regulate the release and bioactivity of exosomes Differential and buoyant density centrifugati on Release of exosomes increased with higher glucose and low oxygen tension. High oxygen tension decreased exosome release - - [64] Primary human trophobla st Placenta hypoxia (fetal growth restriction) Ultracentrif ugation and ultrafiltratio n No effect on other CM19MC miRNAs miR-520c-3p qRT-PCR

(24)

M

AN

US

CR

IP

T

AC

CE

PT

ED

Figure Legend 532 533

Figure 1: Overall summary of extracellular and intracellular miRNAs as biomarkers for

534

GDM. The placenta provides the exchange of nutrients between maternal and fetal blood

535

supply during pregnancy. The mother and fetus release exosomes containing miRNA and

536

proteins, which allows cell-to-cell communication via the delivery of their cargo into recipient

537

cells. In addition, miRNAs can be bound to protein and HDL complexes. Extracellular and

538

intracellular miRNAs can be isolated from plasma or tissue/cells, respectively. After isolation,

539

miRNAs can be quantified by methods including: qRT-PCR, NGS and microarrays. Using

540

these methods, the differential expression of candidate miRNAs between GDM and normal

541

pregnancies can be established and putative biomarkers of GDM (e.g. miR-222 and C19MC

542

miRNA region) identified and validated.

(25)

M

AN

US

CR

IP

T

AC

CE

(26)

M

AN

US

CR

IP

T

AC

CE

PT

ED

Conflict of Interest Statement

References

Related documents

It is predominant for strengthening the family unit by advocating for uncontaminated sexuality, actions and words, therefore, having no sexual affairs before

The mottled seed from the R7r9 plants scored 4.87 compared with 5.01 for the corresponding class borne on rgrg sibs (average values from Table 5 ). The difference is

widely introduced and implemented [2, 5, 6, 11]. Rahman et al. [8] proposed an open multi-tier architecture for high- performance using SOA. The model is a scalable,

The salient findings from this study are that vaccination with live, single-cycle HSV-2 Δ gD-2 affords com- plete protection against a panel of genetically diverse HSV-1 and

We used mice with various levels of TF expression and found that astrocyte TF activity reduced to ~5% of WT levels was still sufficient to maintain hemostasis after hemorrhagic

The digital value is then used to control an adaptive vibrating motor to help relieve muscle fatigue.. The appli- cation (APP) charged with monitoring and controlling unit functions

A. But the theoretical aspect of this method has not fully investigated yet. In this article, in addition to presenting a new approach for solving FIE of the second kind, the theory

The subjects ’ respiratory ability (forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), peak expiratory flow (PEF), and maximum phonation time (MPT)) were measured