• No results found

INVESTOR PRESENTATION. June, 2016

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "INVESTOR PRESENTATION. June, 2016"

Copied!
30
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

INVESTOR PRESENTATION

(2)

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Information

Certain information contained in this presentation constitutes forward-looking statements. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, are forward looking statements including statements with respect to the closing of the underwritten private placement and the Company’s intentions for its Hermosa Project in Arizona, USA including, without limitation, future drilling and other work on the Taylor Deposit, and the statements under Outlook later in this document. Forward-looking statements are often, but not always, identified by the use of words such as may, will, seek, anticipate, believe, plan, estimate, budget, schedule, forecast, project, expect, intend, or similar expressions.

The forward-looking statements are based on a number of assumptions which, while considered reasonable by Arizona Mining, are subject to risks and uncertainties. In addition to the assumptions herein, these assumptions include the assumptions described in Arizona Mining's management's discussion and analysis for the year ended December 31, 2015 ("MD&A"). Arizona Mining cautions readers that forward-looking statements involve and are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those expressed in or implied by such forward-looking statements and forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future results, performance or achievement. These risks, uncertainties and factors include general business, economic, competitive, political, regulatory and social uncertainties; actual results of exploration activities and economic evaluations; fluctuations in currency exchange rates; changes in project parameters; changes in costs, including labour, infrastructure, operating and production costs; future prices of zinc, lead, silver and other minerals; variations of mineral grade or recovery rates; operating or technical difficulties in connection with exploration, development or mining activities, including the failure of plant, equipment or processes to operate as anticipated; delays in completion of exploration, development or construction activities; changes in government legislation and regulation; the ability to maintain and renew existing licenses and permits or obtain required licenses and permits in a timely manner; the ability to obtain financing on acceptable terms in a timely manner; contests over title to properties; employee relations and shortages of skilled personnel and contractors; the speculative nature of, and the risks involved in, the exploration, development and mining business; and the factors discussed in the section entitled "Risks and Uncertainties" in the MD&A.

Although Arizona Mining has attempted to identify important risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual performance, achievements, actions, events, results or conditions to differ materially from those expressed in or implied by the forward-looking information, there may be other risks, uncertainties and other factors that cause performance, achievements, actions, events, results or conditions to differ from those anticipated, estimated or intended. Unless otherwise indicated, forward-looking statements contained herein are as of the date hereof and Arizona Mining disclaims any obligation to update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or results or otherwise, except as required by applicable law.

About Reserves and Resources

This presentation uses the terms measured, indicated and inferred resources as a relative measure of the level of confidence in the resource estimate. Readers are cautioned that: (a) mineral resources are not economic mineral reserves; (b) the economic viability of resources that are not mineral reserves

Cautionary Statement

(3)

Owns 100% of Hermosa Project

Taylor Deposit discovered in 2015–a significant zinc,

lead, and silver sulfide resource

Well respected, high caliber management team

including Richard Warke, Jim Gowans and Don Taylor

Cash balance at June 1, 2016 of ~C$28 million

(1)

Large, under-explored land package

(1) Includes net proceeds expected on closing of underwritten private placement.

(4)

Company holds 100% interest in:

450 acres Patented Mining Claims

16,600+ acres Unpatented Mining Claims

Current resource centered on the

patented mining claims

State of Arizona has long mining history

Close to required infrastructure

(1)

Hermosa Project

(5)

(1)

(6)

Highlighted Drill Intersections

Taylor Deposit

HDS-331:

41.5 feet (12.6 meters) at 29.41% Pb/Zn, 6.37 oz Ag, 0.89% Cu

HDS-332:

43.5 feet (13.3 meters)at 34.12% Pb/Zn, 5.63 oz Ag, 0.07% Cu

HDS-334:

425 feet (129.5 meters) at 7.47% Pb/Zn, 1.49 oz Ag, 0.14% Cu

HDS-338:

(7)

Long Section

(8)

Cross Section

(9)

Mineralization

Taylor Deposit

Location relationship of

sulfide mineralization

(CRD) to manto oxide

(MRZc and MRZs)

(10)

Inferred Resource

Taylor Deposit

39.4 Million Tonnes @ 11.04% ZnEq

Zn Eq% Cutoff

Zn Eq% Grade

Tonnes (Mt)

Pb%

Zn%

Cu%

Ag g/t

3

8.01

72.3

3.21

3.23

0.10

50.78

4

8.98

59.5

3.63

3.63

0.11

55.78

5

9.98

48.7

4.04

4.03

0.12

61.25

6

11.04

39.4

4.48

4.48

0.14

66.91

8

12.89

27.2

5.24

5.26

0.16

76.35

12

16.80

12.1

6.88

6.84

0.21

97.90

15

19.70

6.6

8.26

7.80

0.27

113.75

20

24.57

2.2

10.37

9.86

0.34

133.64

Results are based on a ZnEq grade calculated with the following metal prices: $0.85/lb for lead and zinc; $2.25/lb for copper; $15/oz for silver. Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability. There is no certainty that all or any part of mineral resources will be converted to mineral reserves.

(11)

Initial Bench-Scale Flotation Results:

Lead Recoveries:

92.9% recovery of lead

76% recovery of silver

Zinc Recoveries:

85.5% recovery of zinc

15% recovery of silver

Excellent Concentrate Grades Indicated:

75% for lead in concentrate

56% for zinc in concentrate

No Deleterious Elements in the Concentrates

Scoping Level Metallurgical Results

(12)

Expansion Potential

(13)

Expansion Potential

(14)

Expansion Potential

Taylor Deposit

Planned 28 hole 125,000 foot drill program

Test potential of Taylor Deposit

5 drill rigs, increasing to 8

Results from first two holes:

HDS-338 Intervals: 101.5 feet (30.9 meters) at 18% Zn/Pb, 6.13 oz

Ag, 0.19% Cu, including 61.5 feet (18.7 meters)at 29% Zn/Pb, 9.32

oz Ag, 0.28% Cu

HDS-339 Intervals: 108 feet (32.9 meters) at 31% Zn/Pb, 5.51 oz Ag,

0.15% Cu, including 57 feet (17.4 meters) at 45% Zn/Pb, 8.82 oz Ag,

0.17% Cu

(15)

Zinc Fundamentals-$1.55/lb by 2018

Taylor Deposit

Zinc inventories at lowest since 2009

Mine production down – Century, Lisheen,

and other closures

Spot treatment charges at lowest levels for

years

Price forecast to increase due to structural

imbalance - $1.55/lb by 2018

(16)

Deliverables

Taylor Deposit

Compete planned 2016 drill program Q3-16

Update inferred resource Q4-16

PEA Q2-17

(17)

Reasons to Own AZ

Large, high grade Zn/Pb/Ag resource and growing

Simple processing, high recoveries, no deleterious

elements, high grade concentrates

Only 20% of potential mineralized area tested by

drilling

Proven management team

Mining friendly jurisdiction

Large land package with additional exploration

(18)

Toronto Stock Exchange Trading Symbol

AZ

Issued and Outstanding

219.2 million

Issued Options and warrants

44.1 million

Fully Diluted

263.2 million

Share Price as of May 31, 2016

C$1.60

Market Capitalization

C$351 million

Average Volume (20 days)

319,000

52 Week High/Low

C$1.79/$0.22

Management/Insider Ownership

~44%

(19)

Richard W. Warke

Executive Chairman

Founder of the Company (Chairman and CEO). He was also the founder and Chairman of Ventana Gold Corp which was sold for C$1.533 billion and Augusta Resource Corporation which was sold for C$666 million. Richard is currently the President, CEO and Director of Catalyst Copper. He has more than 25 years of experience in corporate finance and marketing in the global resource industry, and has been involved in raising over $1 billion dollars in equity for resource companies. Although his endeavours have primarily involved mineral resource operations, he has also been involved with oil and gas, forestry, technology and manufacturing operations.

James Gowans

President and CEO

Mr. Gowans was formerly Co-President of Barrick Gold Corporation from July 2014 to August 2015 and Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer from January to July 2014. Recent prior roles include Managing Director of Debswana Diamond Company (Pty) Ltd., President and Chief Executive Officer of De Beers Canada Inc., Chief Operating Officer and Senior Vice President of International Nickel Indonesia tbk PT and Executive Vice President at Placer Dome Inc. Mr. Gowans has more than 30 years of experience in mineral exploration, mine feasibility studies, opening new mines, commissioning mine expansions and in the development of best practices in mine safety, mine operations and economic performance improvement. Mr. Gowans is a Professional Engineer and received a bachelor of applied science degree in mineral engineering from the University of British Columbia and attended the Banff School of Advanced Management.

Donald R. Taylor

COO

30 years of successful mineral exploration experience on more than five continents in base and precious metals, taking projects from exploration to mine development; was previously at Doe Run Resources and BHP Minerals; has Bachelor of Science degree in Geology from Southeast Missouri State University and a MSc from University of Missouri at Rolla; Licensed Professional Geologist in several states and QP as defined by NI 43-101.

Paul J. Ireland

Chief Financial Officer

Extensive financial experience in mining and forestry; Chartered Accountant; also CFO of Catalyst Copper. Other recent CFO roles with Ventana Gold Corp prior to its acquisition in 2011, Diavik Diamond Mines Inc. and Western Forest Products Inc.

Gregory F. Lucero

Vice President, Community and Government Affairs

More than 20 years of management experience in both the public and private sector, as well as an extensive background in the executive government working for local, state, and federal elected officials; holds a Bachelor of Arts degree in Political Science from the University of Arizona.

Purni Parikh

Vice President, Corporate Secretary

More than 22 years experience in business administration including more than 17 years experience with public companies in the areas of communications, investor relations and legal administration; also Corporate Secretary for Plata Latina Minerals and Catalyst Copper, as well as Augusta Resource Corporation prior to its recent acquisition.

Johnny Pappas

Director, Environmental and Permitting

Mr. Pappas has a distinguished career in the field of environmental management and permitting. Mr. Pappas recently held the position of Director of Environmental Affairs for Romarco Minerals Inc. where he was instrumental in directing the federal and state permitting of the Haile Gold Mine; the first gold mine permitted east of the Mississippi in the last 20 years. He was previously the Environmental Manager of the Climax Mine and was Permit Coordinator for Barrick’s Cortez Gold Mines. In

(20)

Richard W. Warke

Executive Chairman

Founder of the Company (Chairman and CEO). He was also the founder and Chairman of Ventana Gold Corp which was sold for C$1.533 billion and Augusta Resource Corporation which was sold for over C$666 million. Richard is currently President, CEO and Director of Catalyst Copper. He has more than 25 years of experience in corporate finance and marketing in the global resource industry, and has been involved in raising over $1 billion dollars in equity for resource companies. Although his endeavours have primarily involved mineral resource operations, he has also been involved with oil and gas, forestry, technology and manufacturing operations.

James Gowans

Director

Mr. Gowans was formerly Co-President of Barrick Gold Corporation from July 2014 to August 2015 and Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer from January to July 2014. Recent prior roles include Managing Director of Debswana Diamond Company (Pty) Ltd., President and Chief Executive Officer of De Beers Canada Inc., Chief Operating Officer and Senior Vice President of International Nickel Indonesia tbk PT and Executive Vice President at Placer Dome Inc. Mr. Gowans has more than 30 years of experience in mineral exploration, mine feasibility studies, opening new mines, commissioning mine expansions and in the development of best practices in mine safety, mine operations and economic performance improvement. Mr. Gowans is a Professional Engineer and received a bachelor of applied science degree in mineral engineering from the University of British Columbia and attended the Banff School of Advanced Management.

Poonam Puri

Director

Poonam Puri, Professor of Law and formerly Associate Dean at Osgoode Hall Law School and affiliated scholar to Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg LLP, is one of Canada’s most respected scholars and commentators on issues of corporate governance, corporate law, securities law and financial regulation. Professor Puri is a member of the Board of Directors of the Greater Toronto Airports Authority and also sits on the Board of Directors of Toronto’s Women’s College Hospital. Professor Puri has a Bachelor of Laws (LLB) degree from the University of Toronto, a Master of Laws (LLM) degree from Harvard Law School and is a member of the Institute of Corporate Directors.

Don Taylor

Director

30 years of successful mineral exploration experience on more than five continents in base and precious metals, taking projects from exploration to mine development; was previously at Doe Run Resources and BHP Minerals; has Bachelor of Science degree in Geology from Southeast Missouri State University and a MSc from University of Missouri at Rolla; Licensed Professional Geologist in several states and QP as defined by NI 43-101.

Donald R. Siemens

Director

Independent financial advisor specializing in corporate finance, cross-border transactions and mergers and acquisitions; previously, Partner-in-Charge of Thorne Ernst & Whinney's (now KPMG) Vancouver office Financial Advisory Services group; over 30 years of experience as a Chartered Accountant; currently Director and Audit Committee Chair for Hansa Resources Limited,

(21)

Taylor Deposit Resource and Drill Results

Scott Wilson, President of Metal Mining Consultants, is an independent qualified person as defined by National Instrument 43-101 has approved and verified the information in relation to the Taylor Deposit resource estimates. Mr. Wilson is a Certified Professional Geologist and member of the American Institute of Professional Geologists (CPG #10965) and a Registered Member (#4025107) of the Society of Mining, Metallurgy and Exploration, Inc., a professional association and designation recognized by the Canadian regulatory authorities.

The results of Arizona Mining’s drilling results have been reviewed, verified and compiled by Donald Taylor, MSc., PG, President and Chief Operating Officer for Arizona Mining, a qualified person as defined by National Instrument 43-101 (NI 43-101). Mr. Taylor has more than 25 years of mineral exploration and mining experience, and is a Registered Professional Geologist through the SME (registered member #4029597). Mr. Taylor is also a Licensed Professional Geologist in several US states.

Central Deposit Prefeasibility Study, Reserves and Resources

Joshua Snider, PE, an independent Qualified Person under the standards set forth by NI 43-101, was responsible for preparing the information in relation to the pre-feasibility. Mr. Snider is a Civil Engineer with M3 and has over 15 years of experience in the engineering and mining industry.

Metallurgical test results included in the pre-feasibility study have been reviewed, verified, and interpreted by Christopher Easton, BSc., Chemical Engineering, a Qualified Person under the standards set forth by NI 43-101. Mr. Easton is the president of Easton Process Consulting Inc. has 24 years of mineral processing and metallurgical engineering experience, and is a Qualified Professional Member in Metallurgy of MMSA.

Scott Wilson, President of Metal Mining Consultants, is an independent qualified person as defined by National Instrument 43-101 was responsible for preparing the information in relation to the Hermosa Central mineral reserve and mineral resource estimates, including the Hermosa North West mineral resource. Mr. Wilson is a Certified Professional Geologist and member of the American Institute of Professional Geologists (CPG #10965) and a Registered Member (#4025107) of the Society of Mining, Metallurgy and Exploration, Inc., a professional association and designation recognized by the Canadian regulatory authorities.

Timothy George, PE, an independent Qualified Person under the standards set forth by NI 43-101, reviewed and was responsible for preparing the information for the Hermosa reserve determination and mine plan in the pre-feasibility study. Mr. George is a Mining Engineer with Metal Mining Consultants.

Process design criteria and cost estimates for the EMM facility in relation to the pre-feasibility study have been reviewed by Terry McNulty, D Sc, PE., a Qualified Person under the standards set forth by NI 43-101. Dr. McNulty is President of T. P. McNulty and Associates, Inc., has over 50 years of experience in

Qualified Persons

(22)

ZINC MARKET DATA

TAYLOR DEPOSIT DRILL DATA

CENTRAL DEPOSIT INFORMATION

(23)

Appendix

(24)

Appendix

Zinc Spot Treatment Charge

China CIF spot TC’s expected in $125-$135/t range

(25)

Appendix

Zinc Forecast to be in a Deficit for Next Three Years

Zinc price expected to break out on projected deficit – Scotiabank’s Patricia Mohr

forecasts $1.55 for 2018

Source: Scotiabank April 12, 2016

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016E

2017E

2018E

2019E

2020E

Gross total mine production

12,105

12,552

12,722

12,835

12,956

13,302

13,271

13,837

14,251

14,922

15,279

Less disruption allowance

(398)

(415)

(428)

(448)

(458)

Net mine production

12,105

12,552

12,722

12,835

12,956

13,302

12,873

13,422

13,823

14,474

14,821

Growth

3.7%

1.4%

0.9%

0.9%

2.7%

-3.2%

4.3%

3.0%

4.7%

2.4%

Concentrate surplus/(deficit)

(395)

(196)

623

339

56

(110)

-

-

-

-

-Refined zinc production

12,715

12,968

12,454

12,935

13,281

13,903

13,431

13,909

14,329

14,981

15,365

2.0%

-4.0%

3.9%

2.7%

4.7%

-3.4%

3.6%

3.0%

4.6%

2.6%

Consumption

11,693

12,551

12,827

13,295

13,887

13,989

14,077

14,281

14,538

14,815

15,099

7.3%

2.2%

3.6%

4.5%

0.7%

0.6%

1.4%

1.8%

1.9%

1.9%

(26)

Appendix

(27)

Appendix

Taylor Deposit – 2016 Drill Program Results to May 6, 2016

DH_ID

From (feet) To (feet) Interval (in feet) From (meters) To (meters) Interval (meters) Ag opt

Cu%

Pb%

Zn%

HDS-338

724

734

10

220.7

223.7

3.0

1.35

0.02

2.80

3.73

HDS-338

2395.5

2497

101.5

730.1

761.0

30.9

6.13

0.19

11.19

7.54

HDS-338 Including

2395.5

2457

61.5

730.1

748.9

18.7

9.32

0.28

17.31

11.78

HDS-338

2527

2537

10

770.2

773.2

3.0

3.60

0.05

7.09

3.24

HDS-338

3242

3254

12

988.1

991.8

3.7

3.72

0.86

4.18

3.86

HDS-338

3278

3352

74

999.1

1021.6

22.6

3.07

0.34

5.71

5.08

HDS-338

3372

3397

25

1027.7

1035.4

7.6

0.86

0.03

1.05

1.38

HDS-339

949

957

8

289.2

291.7

2.4

2.88

0.11

2.27

6.02

HDS-339

977

986

9

297.8

300.5

2.7

1.55

0.02

2.69

7.19

HDS-339

995

1000

5

303.3

304.8

1.5

2.70

0.12

2.36

4.20

HDS-339

1430

1450

20

435.8

441.9

6.1

1.56

0.09

2.52

1.51

HDS-339

1865

1879

14

568.4

572.7

4.3

2.90

0.37

8.72

13.48

HDS-339

1917

2025

108

584.3

617.2

32.9

5.51

0.15

14.72

16.61

HDS-339 Including

1917

1974

57

584.3

601.6

17.4

8.82

0.17

23.09

22.67

HDS-339

2062

2066

4

628.5

629.7

1.2

3.62

0.39

8.85

11.00

HDS-339

2092

2114.5

22.5

637.6

644.5

6.9

1.64

0.06

5.09

4.85

HDS-339

2144.5

2148

4.5

653.6

654.7

1.4

28.03

1.83

5.89

19.45

HDS-339

2421

2468

47

737.9

752.2

14.3

2.15

0.21

7.19

8.55

HDS-339

2488

2506

18

758.3

763.8

5.5

0.65

0.02

1.79

2.20

HDS-339

2526

2554.5

28.5

769.9

778.6

8.7

1.53

0.05

4.38

5.56

HDS-339

2574

2593.5

19.5

784.5

790.5

5.9

2.14

0.08

6.44

7.91

HDS-339

2612

2676

64

796.1

815.6

19.5

1.72

0.01

5.54

2.77

HDS-339

2691

2704.5

13.5

820.2

824.3

4.1

2.42

0.06

8.26

8.24

(28)

After-tax NPV (5%) of $830 million, after-tax IRR of 21.3%, and payback of 2.8 years

(1)

Average silver production of 12.2 million ounces per year for the first five years and 5.7 million

ounces per year for the life of mine (LOM)

Average EMM production of 110 million pounds per year for the LOM

Average cash costs of $4.35 per ounce silver and $0.74 per pound of Electrolytic Manganese

Metal (EMM) for the first five years and $4.45 per ounce of silver and $0.73 per pound of

EMM for the LOM

(1,2)

Average silver cash costs, considering all other metals as by-products

(1)

, of $(4.37) per ounce

for LOM

Mine life of 18 years

Initial capital expenditures of $834.6 million including $189.3 million for a 55,000 tons per

annum EMM plant

Appendix

Central Deposit

(29)

Central Deposit Reserve and Resource Estimate

(1)(3)

Ore Type Tons

(000s) Ag (opt) Mn % Contained Ag Ounces (000s) Contained Mn lbs (000s)

Total Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves

Total Proven 31,067 2.73 8.58 84,737 4,051,000

Total Probable 28,589 2.11 7.99 60,339 3,182,000

Total Proven & Probable 59,656 2.43 8.31 145,076 7,233,000

Total Measured and Indicated Mineral Resource (Inclusive of Reserves)

(2)

Measured 76,114 1.55 6.60 118,120 4,898,000

Indicated 105,568 1.11 5.03 117,043 5,443,000

Measured & Indicated 181,681 1.29 5.67 235,163 10,341,000

Total Inferred Mineral Resource

(2)

Inferred 45,151 1.00 3.80 45,068 1,238,000

Appendix

(30)

References

Related documents

Compared to nulliparity, pelvic floor dysfunction was significantly associated with cesarean section (OR 2.5), spontaneous vaginal delivery (OR 3.4) and instrumental delivery

16 From the perspective of foreigners, how much they ultimately lose also depends on how much the exchange rate devalues with the increase in inflation and on whether there are

The variation of the swept volume (in cubic metres) of a single nutating disc engine chamber can be expressed as a function of its tip radius (in metres), hub-to-tip radius ratio,

For IPv4 network, compared to open system, the UDP throughput of IPSec encrypted systems was decreased by a maximum of approximately 20 Mbps (decrease rate of 21%) for

This report is one more in a long list of studies that highlight how dental auxiliaries such as dental therapists could be used as part of dental team in the Washington State to

The mean annual average electricity generation potential of the ShoreSWEC at Granger Bay was determined as the product of the available mean annual average wave energy, derived from

CLooG test suite, icc -O0.. 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 challenges/challenge1.cloog cholesky2.cloog chr istian.cloog classen.cloog daegon_lu_osp .cloog dar te .cloog dot2.cloog