HAL Id: jpa-00248287
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00248287
Submitted on 1 Jan 1996
HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of
sci-entific research documents, whether they are
pub-lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.
Monte Carlo Simulation of Vesicle Self-Organisation
Américo Bernardes
To cite this version:
Américo Bernardes. Monte Carlo Simulation of Vesicle Self-Organisation. Journal de Physique II,
EDP Sciences, 1996, 6 (2), pp.169-174. �10.1051/jp2:1996174�. �jpa-00248287�
Short Communication
Monte
Carlo
Simulation
of
Vesicle
Self-Organisation
Am6rico T, Bernardes
(*)
Institute for Theoretical
Physics,
Cologne
University,
50923Cologne,
Germany
(Received
22 November 1995,accepted
27November1995)
PACS.05.50.+q
Latticetheory
andstatistics;
Ising problems
PACS.82.70.-y
Disperse
systemsPACS.87.15.Da
Physical
chemistry
of solutions ofbiomolecules;
condensed statesAbst+act. Vesicles, which are
droplets
of a fluidencapsulated
ina membrane, represent
the basic structure of almost all life forms. The
amphiphilic
membrane that separates differentdomains acts as a tunable
filter,
selectively
allowing
the passage of chemical substances. Theformation of these aggregates is
subject
ofincreasing
interest, bothexperimental
andtheoret-ically,
due to the fact thatthey
can be usedas
drug
carrier or even as artificial cells. In thispaper, we report the first successful computer simulation of vesicle spontaneous formation
ob-tained by
performing
extensive Monte Carlo calculations in amicroscopic
lattice model basedon two-tailed
arnphiphilic
chains surroundedby
solvent molecules. Thedynamical
process ofaggregation
is also shown and some features of this process are discussed.Amphiphilic
molecules are constituted of twoparts
withopposite
properties:
ahydrophilic
water
loving
"head" and ahydrophobic
hydrocarbon
"tail",
theordinary
detergent
being
oneof the most known
example
of thistype
of molecule. Anothertype
ofamphiphilic
molecules(phospholipids)
constitute the basiccompound
of the cell membrane. In aqueous solutionsthey
canaggregate
in several different ways, which willdepend
on the concentrationand/or
type of
surfactant,
temperature,
pressure etc.[1,2].
Hydrophobic
effectsproduce
aggregates
with the
polar
head outwards in contact with the water moleculeshiding
thehydrocarbon
chains inside. At low temperatures,
amphiphiles
tend to form continuousaggregates
and themembranes are one of the structures most
usually
formed.However,
with thebilayer
struc-ture one can not avoid the contact between the
hydrocarbon
tail and water at theedges
of the membrane. Therefore the membranemight
lower its energyby bending
to form closedstructures,
called vesicles orliposomes.
Thus,
vesiclesseparate
differentportions
of the so-lution and thisproperty
hasimportant
applications
[3],
such as indrugs
delivery
systems
or even theproduction
of artificial cells(like
artificialerythrocytes)
[4].
However,
whereasvesi-cles are
widespread
and formspontaneously
in nature, their artificialproduction
requires
theinput
of considerable mechanical energy andthey
areusually
metastable [5].Recently,
someexperimental
methods weredeveloped
to achieve spontaneousproduction,
such as mixtures ofdifferent types of
amphiphiles
[5,6].
Computer
simulations on lattice models have been usedto
study
theaggregation
ofamphiphiles
and/or
related features: critical micelleconcentration,
transition
temperatures,
stability
ofaggregates
etc.[7-15]
andimportant
results have been(*)
Permanent address: Departamento de Fisica, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto,Campus
doMorro do
Cruzeiro,
34500-000 OuroPreto/MG,
Brazil170 JOURNAL DE
PHYSIQUE
II N°2~
amphiphflic
mol. blifial coring. O d O O Optafion~
O~O
O O o kkkol
Do o o bucklblgFig.
I. Schematic representation(at
top)
of a twc-tailedamphiphile
(here
withlength
ta= 12
and tail
length
=4)
used in this simulation: black circle =head,
white =tail,
and crossed-circle= liaison.
Following
towards the bottom is a two-dimensional representation of a sequence of thepossible
movements(reptation,
kink andbuckling).
Grey
circles represent water molecules(only
thosemolecules influenced
by
the movements areshown).
obtained.
However,
up to nowonly
thespontaneous
formation of micelles has beenobtained,
although
thestability
of membranes has been discussed[13],
butstarting
the simulations withpre-formed
membranes. In this paper,by performing
extensive Monte Carlo simulations withan
improved
version of aLarson-type
model,
we show the spontaneous formation of vesiclesfrom the
aggregation
of two-tailedamphiphiles
randomly
distributed in a cubic lattice. Withextensive observation of this process, we are able to show
dynamical
aspects of the vesicleformation.
In the
present
model for the surfactantsolution,
as in earlier works[13,14j,
anamphiphilic
molecule isrepresented
by
t~
connectedparticles
and a water moleculeby
asingle
particle
on a cubic lattice of L x L x
Lz
sites. Periodicboundary
conditions wereadopted
in the x and y directions and the movement was not allowedthrough
the first and lastplanes
atz direction. Each site may be
occupied
only
once, thereforesatisfying
the excluded volumecondition. The two-tail
amphiphiles
are constituted of a "water-like" head with two sites(defined
in the middle of thepolymer
chain,
namely
in thepositions
[t~/2j
and[ta/2
+lj),
two liaison sites
(that
play
a noninteractionrole)
and two tails with(la
4)/2
sites each.Therefore a water
particle
isrepresented by
anIsing
spin
+I and theamphiphilic
moleculefor
la
= 12by
astring
of connected sites with values:-1,
-1,
-1,
-1,
0, +1,
+1, 0,
-1,
-1,
-lj
-I. In order to simulate thehydrophobic
effect we assume water-water and tail-tail attractions and water-tailrepulsions
through
thefollowing
relations between interactionenergies:
Eww
A)
B)
°.O@040: oa***OO*Oo o@ ~ ee o*o OOOOOO. C) Fig. 533 esiclesA
hows entire vesicle; in part B the vesiclehasbeen
ectioned at the
middle the left
portion
and
its
inner sidej and in part C only the middle layeris
shown (here
the membrane
different domains can be better observed). Black circles represent the head particles, mall
dark
grey
the liaison particles and light grey the tail particlesj the inner water is represented
in part B by
172 JOURNAL DE
PHYSIQUE
II N°2 600 w)
400~
~/
fl
1'
(
200 E~e+00 le+07 2e+07 3e+07 4e+07 MC steps
Fig. 3. Dynamics of the
aggregation
process,showing
the behaviour of thelargest
cluster(the
parameters are the same as that described in
Fig.
2).
In thebeginning
of the simulation micelles are formed and isolatedamphiphiles
aggregate in those clusters(linear
growth
of thelargest
cluster).
These clusters become closer each other and from the contact of the clusters a large one is formed
(the
jumps
on the cluster size observed in thefigure).
This is done
by
changing
an initialconfiguration
by
the movement of a chosenamphiphilic
molecule. The move is
accepted
withprobability exp[ (Eaid
En~w)/kBT
and a MC stepcorresponds
to oneattempted
to move of allamphiphile
molecules.The results we are
going
to show were obtained with onesample,
starting
withamphiphilic
moleculesuniformly
distributed in the cubic lattice. Several simulationsusing
other initialconfigurations
have been done in order to confirm these results. We haveperformed
simulationsat
temperature
t=
2.2,
therefore below the condensation temperature for thistype
of moleculeA)
B)
Fig.
4.Snapshots
of the dynamical process obtained at different times. Part A shows six aggregatesbasically
micelles at S-Sx10~
MC steps. Parts B and C show the fusion of two aggregates(obtained
at tililes 1.12 x lo~ and 1.13 x
10~,
respectively).
Thelargest
cluster has a membrane-like structurewhereas the other is a small vesicle. The latter moves in a amoeba-like way. Parts D and E show
different views of the membrane
bending,
obtained at 1.7 x 10~ MC steps. The symbols have the samemeaning
as that inFigure
2.Again,
note that boxes areprovided
asguides,
I-e-,they
do not represente
c)
D)
E)
Fig.
4.(Contm~ed)
[14j,
in which theamphiphiles
tend toaggregate
in onebig
cluster.Figure
2 shows the finalconfiguration
for a simulation with 533amphiphiles
(representing
a fraction of 0.08 of the total latticevolume)
obtained after 4 x10~
MC steps. In a firstinspection
part
A we observe that the heads and liaison sites aremostly
in the external surfaceenclosing
the tails.However,
when one looks at the inside of this
aggregate
part
B one can observe an internal surfacebasically
formedby
heads and liaisonsites,
encapsulating
a volume of water that has filled this internalportion.
This feature can be better seen in part C that represents the middlelayer
of thisfigure.
Themajor
length
of thisaggregate
is oriented in the y zdirection,
butin other simulations we have obtained different
orientations,
that means thatqualitatively
thefinal results have not been influenced
by
the restriction of the movement in the z direction. Thedynamical
process of vesicle formation issubject
ofgreat
interest and somepossible
ways have been described in the literature[3,17j.
Examples
are: membranebending forming
a closedsurface,
fusion of micelles withre-arrangement
of theamphiphilic
molecules and fusion174 JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE II N°2
of vesicles.
Figure
3 shows thedynamical
behaviour of thelargest
cluster obtained in oursimulation. First the
amphiphiles
aggregate
in smallclusters,
basically
micelle-likeaggregates,
and the isolatedamphiphiles
tend toaggregate
in these micelles. Afterwards a new process takesplace,
when theseaggregates
fuse inlarger
ones,producing
thejumps
that one observesin the
plot.
Ifinitially
theseaggregates
aremicelles,
the last ones present a morecomplex
aggregation
form,
dealing
with theproblem
ofavoiding
the contact between the tails andwater molecules. Membrane-like and
pre-vesicles
aggregates
can be found. Somepictures
ofthis process described above can be seen in
Figure
4,
which showssnapshots
of thesystem
obtained at different moments.
Firstly
theamphiphilic
moleculesaggregate
in micelles(part
A,
but even here we may see a membrane-like structure the verticalaggregate
attop-left
corner).
Parts B and C show the moment of fusion of thelargest
aggregate
(a
membrane-likestructure)
with apre-vesicle,
this becomes closer to thelarger
one(B)
andthey
touch eachother
(C), forming
the new cluster. Parts D and E show different views of the sameaggregate.
Here,
thebending
of the membrane can be seen. Note that the micelle at the bottom ofparts
B up to E becomes smaller due to the fact that it lost
amphiphiles,
which havemigrated
to thelargest
cluster. From these results someinteresting
questions
arise: the behaviour ofsingle-tail
amphiphiles,
thestability
ofmembranes,
the role of the tailbending
rigidity
etc.Acknowledgments
I would like to thank D.
Chowdhury,
D.Staufler,
T-B-Liverpool,
C. Shida and V. B.Henriques
for many
stimulating
discussions andsuggestions.
This ~vork ispartially
supported
by
theBrazilian
Agency
Conselho Nacional para o Desenvolvimento Cientifico eTecno16gico
CNPq.
References
[1j Tanford
C.,
TheHydrophobic
Eflect: Formation of Micelles andBiological
Membranes(J.
Wiley,
NewYork,
1980).
[2j
Gompper
G. and SchickM.,
Self-Assembling
amphiphilic
systems
(Academic
Press,
Lon-don,
1994)j
Gompper
G. and GoosJ.,
in "Annual Revie~vs ofComputational
Physics
II",
D. Stauffer Ed.(World
Scientific,
Singapore, 1995).
[3]
Lipowsky R.,
Nature 349(1991)
475.[4] Gaber
B-P-,
Schnur J-M- andChapman
D.,
Biotechnological
Applications
ofLipid
Mi-crostructures
(Plenum
Press,
NewYork,
1988).
[5] Kaler
E-W-,
KamalakaraMurthy
A.,
Rodriguez
B-E- and ZasadzinskiJ-A-N-,
Science 245(1989)
1371.[6] Kaler
E-W-,
Herrington
K-L- and KamalakaraMurthy
A.,
J. Chem.Phys.
96(1992)
6698. [7] LarsonR-G-,
Scriven L-E- and DavisH-T-,
J. Chem.Phys.
83(1985)
2411.[8]
Chowdhury
D. and StaufferD.,
J. Chem.Phys.
95(1991)
7764. [9] LarsonR-G-,
J. Chem.Phys.
96(1992)
6904.[10] Bernardes
A-T-, Henriques
V-B- and BischP-M-,
J. Chem.Phys.
101(1994)
645.[11] Jan N. and Stauffer
D.,
J.Phys.
I France 4(1994)
345.[12] Stauffer D. and Woermann
D.,
J.Phys.
II France 5(1995)
1.[13]