• No results found

Operational Core Network

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Operational Core Network"

Copied!
8
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Application Brochure

Operational

Core Network

Using Carrier-Grade Ethernet

Typical users: Transmission & Distribution Power Utilities

Service Assured Networking for Power Utilities

For more than 30 years, RAD has worked closely with its worldwide energy utility customers to provide field-proven communications solutions that address the automation, Teleprotection and operational core network needs of their transmission and distribution (T&D) grids.

Service Assured Networking: RAD offers secure, reliable, scalable, managed, and performance guaranteed solutions for automation, protection, security, and ICT networking

that support multiple deployment scenarios over SDH/ SONET and carrier-grade Ethernet networks. A vast array of capabilities include service provisioning, traffic management, timing synchronization, TDM pseudowire, ongoing performance monitoring, fault management, and various resiliency mechanisms.

(2)

Which Networking

Technology Is the Best?

With the shift from SONET/SDH to packet in equipment

interfaces and substation services, RAD is again at the forefront of assisting power utilities to rapidly adapt to the changing landscape of requirements. Today, RAD is

applying its carrier-grade expertise in the field of Service Assured Networking and Carrier Ethernet to provide the most affordable, reliable and – most importantly – secure alternative to traditional SDH/SONET networks.

Why Carrier Ethernet Can Replace SDH/SONET

Service Requirements

Carrier

Ethernet

SONET

SDH/

Carrier Ethernet Attributes

Multiservice + + Pseudowire, traffic management, OAM,

deployed worldwide

Synchronization and Timing + + (-) SyncE, 1588V2, IEC C37.238, SDH only frequency

Critical Services + + 5-10 times lower latency than SDH/SONET

Resiliency + + Sub 50ms: G.8032, G.8031, LAG, PWE redundancy,

HSR, hardware redundancy

Deterministic Paths + + E-line, E-LAN tunnel

Traffic Management + + Hierarchical scheduling, end-to-end CIR for TDM

OAM + + Y.1731, IEEE 802.1ag

End-to-End Management + + End-to-end NMS and service management

(3)

Carrier Ethernet Compared with MPLS and MPLS-TP

Which packet switched network technology is the best fit for power utilities communications networks? RAD has selected Carrier Ethernet as the most suitable technology to replace the trusted SDH/SONET network. The reasons why are outlined in the table below:

Carrier Ethernet

IP/MPLS

MPLS-TP

Simplicity Simple – Similar in architecture to SDH/SONET

Complex – Requires an IP overlay and architecture

Complex – Requires an IP overlay and architecture

Resiliency High Resiliency – Mesh and Ring

High Resiliency – Mesh and Ring High Resiliency – Mesh and Ring

Security Secure – Resistant to control plane attacks and has robust support for source authentication

Low Security – Many vulnerabilities exist. See RFC 5920 for complete list

Low Security – Vulnerable to data plane attack, snooping and scouting

Cost Inexpensive Higher cost per bit Higher cost per bit

Circuit Set-up Static – Requires NMS support for provisioning network services

Dynamic – Able to self-configure services on the fly

Static – Requires NMS support for provisioning network services

Field-proven High – Many networks deployed and commonly supported by many vendors

High – Many networks deployed and commonly supported by many vendors

Unknown – Vendors only starting to support and deploy

(4)

Operational Core Network Using

Carrier-Grade Ethernet

ETX-5

Megaplex-4

RADview

Ethernet Service Aggregation Platform Hybrid Cross-Generation Multiservice Multiplexer Carrier-Class Network Management System RTU PBX Substation Teleprotection Carrier-Grade Ethernet RTU PBX Substation Teleprotection ETX-5 ETX-5 ETX-5 Megaplex-4 Megaplex-4 RADview

Simplified architecture and management

Increased security

Lower latency

Assured QoS using Carrier Ethernet tools

Ongoing performance monitoring

TDM support using Pseudowire

Carrier-grade Ethernet is ideal for replacing SDH/SONET for operational applications,

offering various advantages:

(5)

Hybrid Solution with

Traffic Duplication

Traffic Duplication is a unique technology developed by RAD as part of its Service Assured Networking solution, to allow networks with mission critical applications to enhance reliability and performance. It can be used to minimize delay on critical utility applications (such as Teleprotection) by capitalizing on Carrier Ethernet’s reduced latency at higher speeds. Mission-critical traffic can be transported over a new Carrier Ethernet network that’s running in parallel to the existing SDH/SONET, preparing for full service migration later on. RAD’s Traffic

Duplication yields proven gains on network resiliency by employing a redundant transport method. In addition, it does so with a minimal investment by using any existing PSN network. Finally, because of the physics of the packet network technology, this feature can be leveraged to actually provide shorter network delay and improve critical application performance such as Teleprotection. These technological and cost reduction benefits are available only with RAD’s Service Assured Networking solution. Central Site Megaplex-4 SDH/SONET Carrier-Grade Ethernet RTU LAN Substation Teleprotection Megaplex-4 RADview ETX-5 ETX-5 ETX-5 Analog Data Center SCADA Server

(6)

Automatic installation

Auto-inventory discovery

One-touch service validation

Service Turn-Up

(CoS)

Hierarchical scheduling, shaping

Congestion avoidance mechanism

Management

Synchronous Ethernet

Built-in GPS

IEEE 1588v2 TC & slave for frequency & phase

Distributed IEEE 1588v2 Grandmaster

Hybrid Sync-E & 1588 ToD

Timing

Rapid deployment/upgrade of network functionality

Relocate functionality to CPE for more effective performance, reduced expenses

Combine layer 2/3 demarcation with standard virtual machine (VM) platform

Distributed NFV

Scalable long-term KPI collection engine

One-way delay measurements

PM dashboard (SLA policies, correlation, violation alerts)

End-customer PM portal & SLA reports

PM as a Service

Ongoing Performance

Monitoring

Automated fault detection & isolation

Fast detection (3.3 ms) of LOC

EVC alarm propagation (AIS & RDI)

HW-based fault management, OAM (CC, LB, LT)

Wire-speed loopback testing (L2/L3)

Fault Management

Link aggregation group (LAG) using IEEE 802.3-2005 LACP (link aggregation control protocol)

Ethernet Ring Protection Switching (G.8032 ERPS)

EVC protection (G.8031) IEC 61850-3 and IEEE 1613 compliant

Resiliency

802.1X, MACsec SNMPv3 SCADA Firewall IPSec

Security

CESoPSN SAToP CESoETH (MEF-8) UDP/IP encapsulation PDH and SDH/SONET

TDM

Service Assured Networking

comprises the following attributes:

• Advanced H-QoS

• Compliance with environmental standards

• Ethernet & legacy services

• Low latency

• Performance monitoring

• Reliability & protection

• Same service look & feel over any access

• Security for SCADA applications

• Service visibility, end-to-end

• Synchronization over packet

• Traffic Duplication

Service Management System

Point-and-click provisioning

network partitioning

GUI: Network clouds, links, nodes,

end-to-end services, status indication

Multi-platform Java for Windows, UNIX Northbound TMF MTOSI interface to NMS/OSS

Ethernet Performance Monitoring Portal

Collects, stores and presents KPIs from RAD devices Actual performance metrics based on ITU-T Y.1731:

Frame delay (latency)

Frame delay variation (jitter) Packet delivery ratioAvailability

Threshold policy management

Performance dashboard with aggregated

and drill-down views

Instant and scheduled report generation Immediate detection of service degradation

Service

Lifecycle

Toolkit

Service Assured Networking

Throughout the Service Lifecycle

(7)

Automatic installation

Auto-inventory discovery

One-touch service validation

Service Turn-Up

(CoS)

Hierarchical scheduling, shaping

Congestion avoidance mechanism

Management

Synchronous Ethernet

Built-in GPS

IEEE 1588v2 TC & slave for frequency & phase

Distributed IEEE 1588v2 Grandmaster

Hybrid Sync-E & 1588 ToD

Timing

Rapid deployment/upgrade of network functionality

Relocate functionality to CPE for more effective performance, reduced expenses

Combine layer 2/3 demarcation with standard virtual machine (VM) platform

Distributed NFV

Scalable long-term KPI collection engine

One-way delay measurements

PM dashboard (SLA policies, correlation, violation alerts)

End-customer PM portal & SLA reports

PM as a Service

Ongoing Performance

Monitoring

Automated fault detection & isolation

Fast detection (3.3 ms) of LOC

EVC alarm propagation (AIS & RDI)

HW-based fault management, OAM (CC, LB, LT)

Wire-speed loopback testing (L2/L3)

Fault Management

Link aggregation group (LAG) using IEEE 802.3-2005 LACP (link aggregation control protocol)

Ethernet Ring Protection Switching (G.8032 ERPS)

EVC protection (G.8031) IEC 61850-3 and IEEE 1613 compliant

Resiliency

802.1X, MACsec SNMPv3 SCADA Firewall IPSec

Security

CESoPSN SAToP CESoETH (MEF-8) UDP/IP encapsulation PDH and SDH/SONET

TDM

Service Assured Networking

comprises the following attributes:

• Advanced H-QoS

• Compliance with environmental standards

• Ethernet & legacy services

• Low latency

• Performance monitoring

• Reliability & protection

• Same service look & feel over any access

• Security for SCADA applications

• Service visibility, end-to-end

• Synchronization over packet

• Traffic Duplication

Service Management System

Point-and-click provisioning

network partitioning

GUI: Network clouds, links, nodes,

end-to-end services, status indication

Multi-platform Java for Windows, UNIX Northbound TMF MTOSI interface to NMS/OSS

Ethernet Performance Monitoring Portal

Collects, stores and presents KPIs from RAD devices Actual performance metrics based on ITU-T Y.1731:

Frame delay (latency)

Frame delay variation (jitter) Packet delivery ratioAvailability

Threshold policy management

Performance dashboard with aggregated

and drill-down views

Instant and scheduled report generation Immediate detection of service degradation

Service

Lifecycle

Toolkit

Service Assured Networking

Throughout the Service Lifecycle

(8)

Specifications are subject to change without prior notification. The RAD name, logo and logotype, are registered trademarks of RAD Data Communications Ltd. RAD product names are trademarks of RAD Data Communications Ltd. ©2013 RAD Data Communications. All rights reserved. Catalog number 802618, Version 11/13

www.rad.com

Additional RAD Service Assured

Networking Solutions for Power Utilities

Distribution Automation & Smart Metering

Backhaul Teleprotection Connectivity for Differential and Distance Relays Substation Communications

References

Related documents

Other key requirements are that the solution must be able to deal with all the different data sources that a user will need to aggregate and report against in their daily

The outcome which this project aimed at was “to boost the capacity of railway transport.” The locomotives manufactured and rehabilitated by these two projects constitute one-third

Slightly less than half (44%) of providers, mainly from NGOs and urban public health FP clinics, as well as pharmacists mentioned occasional stock outs, while 35 percent of

between the health care provider and any other health professional contributing to the patient’s care, and assisting in protecting the legal interest of the patient and the

While previous comparisons between the DOAS and the WRD found that daytime concentrations measured by the WRD were higher than the DOAS compared to nighttime measurements, these

This longitudinal study uses different measurement methods to examine airborne nicotine levels in hospitality venues and the level of personal exposure of non-smoking

CONTENTS Preface 7 Introduction 9 Faculty Listing 11 Department Summary 13 Project Summaries 15 Algebraic Multigrid for Large-Scale Simulations on Unstructured Grids: Phase II 24

- Suppliers provide APIs to transfer information about tariff rates as well as the status of consumers’ switches to comparison sites.. - Forcing suppliers to provide comparison