• No results found

CS 451 Software Engineering Winter 2009

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "CS 451 Software Engineering Winter 2009"

Copied!
47
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

CS 451

Software Engineering

Winter 2009

Yuanfang Cai

Room 104, University Crossings 215.895.0298

(2)
(3)

Testing

Testing only reveals the presence of defects

Does not identify nature and location of defects

Identifying & removing the defect => role of

debugging and rework

Preparing test cases, performing testing, defects

identification & removal all consume effort

Overall testing becomes very expensive :

(4)

Levels of Testing

The code contains requirement defects, design

defects, and coding defects

Nature of defects is different for different injection

stages

One type of testing will be unable to detect the

different types of defects

Different levels of testing are used to uncover

these defects

(5)

User needs Acceptance testing

Requirement

specification System testing

Design Integration testing

(6)

Unit Testing

Different modules tested separately

Focus: defects injected during coding

Essentially a code verification technique, covered

in previous chapter

UT is closely associated with coding

Frequently the programmer does UT; coding

(7)

Integration Testing

Focuses on interaction of modules in a

subsystem

Unit tested modules combined to form

subsystems

Test cases to “exercise” the interaction of

modules in different ways

(8)

System Testing

Entire software system is tested

Focus: does the software implement the

requirements?

Validation exercise for the system with

respect to the requirements

Generally the final testing stage before the

software is delivered

May be done by independent people

Defects removed by developers

(9)

Acceptance Testing

Focus: Does the software satisfy user needs?

Generally done by end users/customer in

customer environment, with real data

Only after successful AT software is deployed

Any defects found,are removed by developers

Acceptance test plan is based on the acceptance

test criteria in the SRS

(10)

Other forms of testing

Performance testing

 tools needed to “measure” performance

Stress testing

 load the system to peak, load generation tools needed

Regression testing

 test that previous functionality works alright

 important when changes are made

 Previous test records are needed for comparisons

 Prioritization of testcases needed when complete test suite cannot be executed for a change

Smoke testing

 Nightly build

(11)

Defect logging and tracking

A large software may have thousands of defects,

found by many different people

Often person who fixes (usually the coder) is

different from who finds

Due to large scope, reporting and fixing of

defects cannot be done informally

Defects found are usually logged in a defect

tracking system and then tracked to closure

Defect logging and tracking is one of the best

(12)

Defect logging…

A defect in a software project has a life cycle of

its own, like

 Found by someone, sometime and logged along with info about it (submitted)

 Job of fixing is assigned; person debugs and then fixes (fixed)

 The manager or the submitter verifies that the defect is indeed fixed (closed)

(13)

Validation and Verification

Validation

: a different set of activities that

ensures that the software that has been built

is traceable to customer requirements.

 Are we building the right product?

Verification

: the set of activities the ensures

that software correctly implements a specific

function.

(14)

15

Organizing Testing

(15)

Organizing Testing

(16)

17

Software Testing Strategies

How do you know when you are done testing?

 There is no definitive answer to this question.

Many possible answers:

 You are never done testing.

 You are done testing when you run out of money or time.

 Depends upon the certainty of failure you desire.

(17)

Strategic Issues

Specify product requirements in a quantifiable

manner long before testing commences

State testing objectives explicitly.

 test coverage, mean time to failure, cost to find and fix defects, remaining defect density or frequency of occurrence

Understand the users of the software and

develop a profile for each user category.

(18)
(19)

Testing Strategies

 Unit Testing – focuses verification effort on the smallest unit of software design. (The component or module)

 Considerations:

 The module interface is tested to ensure that information properly flows into and out of the program unit under test.  All independent paths through the control structure are

exercised to ensure that all statements in a module have been executed at least once.

 Boundary conditions are tested to ensure that the module operates properly.

(20)

21

Testing Strategies

Unit Testing

Procedure

 Unit testing is normally considered as an adjunct to the coding step.

 Design of tests can be done before

coding begins (Agile

(21)

Testing Strategies

 Unit Testing Procedure

 Since each component is not a stand alone program, a bit of work must be done to perform the test.

 Create a driver, usually a main program, that accepts test case data and passes it to the component to be tested. It also may print relevant results.

 Stubs replace modules that may not be coded and are

subordinate to the component to be tested. A stub may do minimum data manipulation , provides verification of entry, and returns control to the module undergoing testing.

(22)

Junit Example

Java Code to Test

public class Math {

static public int add(int a, int b) { return a + b;

} }

(23)

Junit example

JUNIT test case

import junit.framework.*;

public class TestMath extends TestCase { public void testAdd() {

int num1 = 3; int num2 = 2; int total = 5; int sum = 0;

sum = Math.add(num1, num2); assertEquals(sum, total);

(24)
(25)

Integration Testing

 Why is unit testing not enough?  Data can be lost across an interface.

 One module can have an inadvertent effect on another.

 Global data structures can present problems

 Individually acceptable imprecision may become magnified.

 Integration testing is a systematic technique for constructing the software architecture while at the same time conducting tests to uncover errors

associated with interfacing.

 The objective is to take unit tested components and build a program structure that has been dictated by

(26)

Integration Testing

 There is a tendency to attempt non-incremental

integration – construct the whole program via a “big-bang” approach.

 Thus to combine all components at once and test it as an entire program.

 Top Down Integration is an incremental approach to construction of the software architecture. Modules are integrated by moving downward through the control hierarchy, beginning with the main control module.

(27)

Integration Testing -- Top Down

 Modules subordinate to the main control module are incorporated into the structure in either a depth first or breath first manner.

(28)

Integration Testing -- Top Down

 The integration process is preformed in five steps:

1. The main control module is used as a test driver, and stubs are substituted for all components directly

subordinate to the main control module.

2. Depending on the integration approach selected (i.e. depth or breath first), subordinate stubs are replaced one at a time with actual components.

3. Tests are conducted as each component is integrated.

4. On completion of each set of tests, another stub is replaced with the real component.

5. Regression testing may be conducted to ensure that new errors have not been introduced.

(29)

Bottom Up Integration

 Begins construction and testing with atomic modules. Since all subordinates are always available, there is no need for stubs.

 Bottom up integration follows the following steps:

1. Low-level components are combined into clusters that perform a specific software subfunction.

2. A driver (control program for testing) is written to coordinate test cases input and output.

3. The cluster is tested.

4. Drivers are removed and clusters are combined moving upward in the program structure.

(30)
(31)
(32)

Regression Testing

 Each time a new module is added, the software changes.

 These changes may cause problems with functions that previously worked.

 Therefore, we must re-execute some subset of tests that were already conducted to ensure that changes have not propagated unintended side effects.

 Any time you test, if successful you will find errors. When those errors are corrected, software changes. Therefore,

regression testing must be performed in order to ensure that those changes did not propagate unintended side effects.

 Regression tests may be conducted manually – I do not recommend this.

(33)
(34)

Unit Testing in the OO Context

 With OO the concept of the unit changes.

 Because of the dependence of sub classes, unit testing is a bit more complicated.

 In the OO context, unit testing is basically Class testing.

 Cannot simply test methods in a super class and assume they are still valid in each subclass

 Subclasses may re-define important attributes or subordinate methods

(35)

Integration Testing

in the OO Context

Unlike non OO programming, OO programming

does not have an hierarchical control structure.

Integrating one object at a time is also difficult

because of the direct and indirect interactions

of the components that make up the class.

There are two basic strategies:

 Thread-based

(36)

Test Strategies for OO Software

Thread-based testing integrates the set of

classes required to respond to one input or

event for the system.

Each thread is integrated and tested

individually.

Regression testing is applied to ensure no side

effects occur.

Good for GUIs, other event-driven

(37)

Test Strategies for OO Software

Use-based testing begins the construction of

system by testing those classes that use very

few server classes.

After independent classes are tested, the next

layer of classes, called dependent classes are

tested.

This continues until the entire system is

constructed.

(38)

Test Strategies for OO Software

Drivers can be used to test operations at the

lowest level and for testing groups of classes.

A driver may be used to replace the user

interface.

Stubs may be used where collaboration

between classes is required but one or more of

the collaborating classes is not fully

(39)

Test Strategies for OO Software

Cluster testing is one step in integration testing

of OO software.

Here, a cluster of collaborating classes is

exercised by designing test cases that attempt

to uncover errors in the collaborations.

(40)

Validation Testing

Validation Testing

 Validation testing begins at the culmination of integrations testing.

 Testing focuses on the user-visible actions and user-recognizable output from the system.

Validation can be defined as:

 Validation succeeds when software functions in a manner that can be reasonably expected by the customer.

 Software validation is achieved through a series of tests that demonstrate conformity with software

(41)

Test Strategies for Publicly-used

Software

What to do if your product does not have one

or a few customers?

Most software product builders use a process

called alpha and beta testing to uncover errors

that only the end-user seems able to find.

The alpha test is conducted at the developer’s

site by end-users.

The beta test is conducted at the end-user

(42)

Recovery Testing

Recovery Testing – most computer-based

systems must recover from faults and resume

processing within a prespecified time.

Recovery testing is a system test that forces

the software to fail in a variety of ways and

verifies that recovery is properly preformed.

(43)

Security Testing

 Any computer system that manages sensitive

information or causes actions that can improperly harm or benefit individuals is a target for improper or illegal penetration.

 Lot’s of security issues.

 In your code

 In libraries and frameworks

 In database access

 In OS layers

(44)

Security Testing

 During security testing, the tester plays the role(s) of individual who desires to penetrate the system.

 Penetration testing requires high skill and the ability to think outside the box

 Best to get an independent testing group that specializes in penetration testing

 Usually it’s not the software, but people issues.

 People often give out secure information. No system can truly protect against this 100%.

(45)

Stress Testing

 So far all testing assumed normal program functions and performance.

 Stress tests are designed to confront programs with abnormal quantity, frequency, or volume.

 Multiple interrupts per second

 Increased data rate

 Test max memory

(46)

Performance Testing

 Designed to test the run-time performance of software within the context of an integrated system.

 Should be performed at all steps of the testing process.

 Not until system elements are fully integrated that performance of a system can really be ascertained.

 Often requires hardware and software instrumentation to measure resource utilization.

(47)

Summary

Validation and Verification

Different Types of Testing

 Context

References

Related documents