• No results found

Burger King India Ltd.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Burger King India Ltd."

Copied!
5
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Ashika Stock

Broking Limited

IPO Note:

Burger King India Ltd.

Issue Snapshot

Company Name Burger King India Ltd.

Issue Opens

December 02, 2020 to December 04, 2020

Price Band

Rs. 59 to Rs. 60

Bid Lot

250 Equity Shares and in multiples thereof.

The Offer

Public issue of 135,000,000 Equity shares of Face value

Rs. 10 each, (Comprising of fresh issue of 75,000,000

Equity Shares* (Rs. 450 cr.) and Offer for Sale of

60,000,000 Equity Shares (Rs. 360 cr.*) by Selling

Shareholder

“QSR

Asia Pte. Ltd.

”)

.

Issue Size

Rs. 804

810 Crore

IPO Process

100% Book Building

Face Value

Rs. 10.00

Exchanges

NSE & BSE

BRLM

Kotak Mahindra Capital Company Limited, CLSA India

Private Limited, Edelweiss Financial Services Limited

and JM Financial Limited

Registrar

Link Intime India Private Limited

Industry: Food services

Reco: Subscribe Date: December 02, 2020

Issue Break up

Issue Size

Allocation Equity Shares*

QIB

30%

40,500,000

Anchor Investor

45%

60,750,000

HNI

15%

20,250,000

RII

10%

13,500,000

Total Public

100% 135,000,000

Company Highlights

Burger King India Limited (BKIL) is one of the fastest growing international QSR chains in India during the first 5

years of its operations based on number of restaurants (Source: Technopak).

As the national master franchisee of the BURGER KING® brand in India, they have exclusive rights to develop,

establish, operate and franchise Burger King branded restaurants in India. Their master franchisee arrangement

provides them with the ability to use Burger

King’s

globally recognised brand name to grow its business in India,

while leveraging the technical, marketing and operational expertise associated with the global Burger King brand.

Its master franchisee arrangement provides flexibility to tailor their menu to Indian tastes and preferences, as

well as its promotions and pricing. Their customer proposition focuses on value leadership, offering their

customers variety through innovative new food offerings at different day parts, catering to the local Indian palate,

offering a wide range of vegetarian meal options, and its taste advantage and flame grilling expertise.

This has driven footfalls and same-store sales in its restaurants and enabled them to become one of the fastest

growing Quick service restaurant (QSR) brands to reach 200 restaurants among international QSR brands in India

during the first 5 years of its operations.

Since opening its first restaurant in November 2014, BKIL has used its well defined restaurant roll out and

development process with the aim of growing quickly, consistently and efficiently into a pan-India QSR chain and

capitalising on the growing market opportunity in India for QSR restaurants.

As of September 30, 2020, BKIL had 261 restaurants, including 8 Sub-Franchised Burger King Restaurants, across

17 states and union territories and 57 cities across India.

Equity Share Pre-Issue (Nos. Cr.)

30.7

Fresh Share (Nos. Cr.)

7.5

OFS Share (Nos. Cr.)

6.0

Equity Share Post Issue (Nos. Cr.)

38.2

Market Cap (Rs. Cr.)

2,289.9

Dilution

35.4%

Fresh

19.7%

OFS

15.7%

* Based on Higher Price Band @ Rs. 60

Objects of the Offer

Offer for Sale

The Company will not receive any proceeds of the Offer for Sale by the Selling Shareholder. (QSR Asia Pte. Ltd.)

Fresh Issue

Repayment or prepayment of outstanding borrowings of the Company obtained for setting up of new

Company-owned Burger King Restaurants (Rs. 165.0 cr.);

Capital expenditure incurred for setting up of new Company-owned Burger King Restaurants. (Rs. 177.0 cr.); and

(2)

Ashika Stock

Broking Limited

A key focus of its business is promoting and maintaining operational quality, a people-centric culture and

effective technology systems that enable them to optimise the performance of their restaurant enhance

the customer experience they offer and contribute to their growth.

Their right to use the Burger King brand exclusively on a national basis also provides them with substantial

advantages with respect to operational efficiencies and the speed with which they are able to roll out their

national advertising campaigns, manage the supply chain and tailor their menu architecture, promotions

and pricing to its

customers’

tastes and preferences.

The revenue from sale of food and beverages grew from Rs. 375.2 crore in FY18 to Rs. 835.32 crore in

FY20. However, the COVID-19 crisis has had a significant impact on its results of operations at the end of

FY20 and in H1FY21, resulting in a decrease of its revenue from sale of food and beverages to Rs. 134.69

crore in H1FY21, compared to Rs. 419.37 crore in H1FY20.

Same-store sales grew at 29.21% in FY19 and 6.11% in 9MFY20, the same-store sales decreased by

0.30% in FY20 and by 56.9% in H1FY21 primarily due to the impact of the COVID-19 crisis.

The gross margin grew from Rs. 232.21 crore in FY18 to Rs. 536.80 crore in FY20 and decreased to Rs.

85.95 crore in H1FY21 compared to Rs. 269.94 crore in H1FY20.

View

Burger King India Limited (BKIL) is one of the fastest growing international Quick Service Restaurants (QSR)

chains in India with 261 stores as on September20 (first store was opened in November 2014).

Its franchisee agreement facilitates flexibility to tailor its menu according to Indian taste and preferences

along with promotions and pricing, while its customer preposition such as variety, wide range of

vegetarian offerings, taste advantage, and flame grilling experience attract customers to drive footfall in

the stores.

BKIL has 5% market share in

India’s

Rs. 348 billion QSR market.

The

company’s

average ticket value stands at Rs. 500-550.

As of September 30, 2020, BKIL had 261 restaurants, including 8 Sub-Franchised Burger King Restaurants,

across 17 states and union territories and 57 cities across India. The company aims to have 370 stores by

the end of December 2022 (700 stores by December 2026).

BKIL plans to continue to build its restaurant network using a cluster approach and penetration strategy

with the objective to provide greater convenience and accessibility for customers across relevant

geographies. BKIL owns around 97% of the total outlets in India. Management is confident of achieving

the target of opening 700 outlets PAN India by extended timeframe up to December 2026 despite current

slowdown witnessed following a pandemic.

Covid-19 had significant impact on H1FY21 performance of BKIL with same-store-sales growth down by

59%, as a large number of stores was non-operational during the period (revenue down by ~68% and the

company registered an operating loss of Rs. 3.9crore).

According to RHP, H2FY21 is expected to be better than H1 as most cities have removed restrictions.

In terms of the valuations, on the higher price band, BKIL demands EV/EBITDA multiple of 22.3x based on

post issue fully diluted equity.

Strong franchisee model, exclusive national franchise rights in India, negative working capital, strong

customer proposition, market share gains from standalone players, vertically managed and scalable supply

chain coupled with well-defined restaurant roll out, strong store expansion plans and experience and

passionate team are some of the key strengths of the company, which will help in improving growth

prospects and post good operational performance in the coming years.

(3)

Ashika Stock

Broking Limited

Heads

Domino’s

McDonald KFC

Subway

Burger

King

Pizza

Hut

Chilli’s

BBQ

Nation

The Great

Kebab Factory

Format

QSR

QSR

QSR

QSR

QSR

CDR

CDR

CDR

FDR

Business Model

Master

Franchisee

Master

Franchisee

Multiple

Franchisee

Micro

Franchisee

Joint

Venture

Multiple

Franchisee

Regional

Franchisee

Own

Franchisee

Own

Franchisee

Outlet Count

1,354

311

454

541

261

431

21

147

23

APC (

)

200 -225

225 -250

200 -225

175 -200 200 -225

400 -450

600 -700

775 -800

1250 -1500

Average Ticket

Value (

)

500 -550

550 -600

500 -550

250 -300 500 -550

1450 -1550 2750 -3000 3500 -3750 6000 -6500

COGS

22-23%

34-36%

34-36%

32-34%

35-36%

25-26%

29-30%

34-35%

31-32%

Gross Margins

77 -78%

64-66%

64-66%

66-68%

64-65%

74-75%

70-71%

65-66%

68-69%

Advertisement

4-5%

5-6%

6-7%

4-5%

~5%

4-5%

3-4%

NA

5-6%

Royalty

3-4%

4-5%

7-8%

7-8%

4-5%

7-8%

5-6%

NA

6-7%

Store EBITDA

21-23%

13-15%

14-16%

20-22%

12-14%

17-19%

20-21%

20-21%

16-18%

Capex for Initial

Build & Opening

150-200L

350-400L

300-350L

40-50L

200-250L

200-250L

300-350L

250-300L

400-500L

Avg. Store Size

(Sq.ft.)

1400 -1600 2600 - 3200 2500 -3000 750 - 1000 1300 -1400 2600 -3200 3700 -4300 4800 -5400 4500 -5000

Average sales /

Day

0.75-0.80L 1.2-1.3L

1.2-1.3L

0.30-0.35L 1.1-1.2L

0.7-0.8L

1.4-1.5L

1.5-1.6L

1.9-2.1L

Brands

Outlet

Total

Count

Mega Metros

Mini Metros

Tier I

Tier II & Others

Outlet

count

% to total

outlet count

Outlet

count

% to total

outlet count

Outlet

count

% to total

outlet count

Outlet

count

% to total

outlet count

Domino’s

1,354

339

25%

433

32%

271

20%

311

23%

Subway

541

135

37%

173

43%

108

12%

124

8%

McDonald’s

481

120

36%

154

35%

96

17%

111

12%

KFC

454

114

19%

145

37%

91

21%

104

23%

Wow! Momo

317

79

29%

101

59%

63

6%

73

6%

Burger King

261

65

41%

84

26%

52

11%

60

23%

Jumbo King

131

33

83%

42

11%

26

6%

30

-La Pino’z

134

34

27%

43

21%

27

33%

31

19%

Haldiram

80

20

79%

26

9%

16

7%

18

5%

Bikanervala

82

21

61%

26

9%

16

14%

19

16%

Smokin Joe’s

50

13

58%

16

20%

10

4%

12

18%

Taco Bell

57

14

32%

18

54%

11

12%

13

2%

Street food by Punjab Grill

41

10

47%

13

34%

8

12%

9

7%

The key QSR brands outlet presence as of September 30, 2020

The business model of the key brands in India

The geographical penetration of chain QSR brands as of September 30, 2020

Brands

Outlet

Total

Count

North (%)

South (%)

East (%)

West (%)

Outlet

count

% to total

outlet count

Outlet

count

% to total

outlet count

Outlet

count

% to total

outlet count

Outlet

count

% to total

outlet count

Domino’s

1,354

447

33%

379

28%

162

12%

366

27%

Subway

541

206

38%

146

27%

38

7%

151

28%

McDonald’s

481

154

32%

135

28%

10

2%

183

38%

KFC

454

132

29%

182

40%

77

17%

64

14%

(4)

Ashika Stock

Broking Limited

(In Rs. Cr)

FY18

FY19

FY20

H1FY20

H1FY21

Cash flow from Operations Activities

30.5

86.5

112.7

73.8

9.6

Cash flow from Investing Activities

12.8

(114.0)

(230.4)

(71.4)

(27.8)

Cash flow from Financing Activities

(48.4)

36.1

105.9

(5.9)

23.3

Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

(5.2)

8.7

(11.8)

(3.5)

5.1

Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year

12.4

7.2

15.9

15.9

4.1

Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year

7.2

15.9

4.1

12.3

9.2

Source: RHP

Comparison with listed industry peers

Financial Statement

Cash Flow Statement

(In Rs. Cr)

FY18

FY19

FY20

H1FY20

H1FY21

Share Capital

265.0

265.0

277.7

266.6

290.9

Net Worth

287.1

249.6

275.4

237.4

218.9

Long Term Borrowings

0.0

0.0

178.8

38.5

176.0

Other Long Term Liabilities

356.3

456.8

586.1

507.0

582.1

Short-term borrowings

0.0

100.0

19.7

100.0

19.8

Other Current Liabilities

86.9

114.0

137.7

142.3

180.4

Fixed Assets

602.6

812.8

1084.2

927.8

1047.5

Non Current Assets

18.7

26.1

33.5

46.7

33.2

Current Assets

109.1

81.5

79.9

50.7

96.4

Total Assets

730.4

920.5

1197.7

1025.2

1177.1

Revenue from Operations

378.1

632.7

841.2

422.3

135.2

Revenue Growth (%)

67.3

33.0

(68.0)

EBITDA

8.1

79.0

104.0

57.0

(28.7)

EBITDA Margin (%)

2.1

12.5

12.4

13.5

(21.2)

Net Profit

(82.2)

(38.3)

(76.6)

(17.4)

(118.9)

Net Profit Margin (%)

(21.7)

(6.0)

(9.1)

(4.1)

(88.0)

Earnings Per Share (Rs.)

(3.1)

(1.4)

(2.9)

(0.7)

(4.1)

Return on Networth (%)

(28.6)

(15.3)

(27.8)

Net Asset Value per Share (Rs.)

10.8

9.4

10.3

7.6

Source: RHP, Ashika Research

Co Name

Net Sales

(Rs. Cr.)

OPM

(%)

D/E

(x)

ROCE

(%)

RONW

(%)

P/BV

(x)

EV/EBIDTA

(x)

Market Cap

(Rs. Cr.)

Burger King

841.2

12.4

0.1

14.3

-27.8

3.4

22.3

2289.9

Jubilant FoodWorks

3927.3

24.1

0.0

47.7

23.5

29.3

43.3

32961.9

Westlife Development

1547.8

14.7

0.3

9.1

-1.3

14.0

67.8

6778.6

Growth in

company’s

Restaurants since March 31, 2015

FY15

FY16

FY17

FY18

FY19

FY20

H1FY21

By Region

North

6

21

37

55

86

129

131

West

6

14

29

40

55

68

66

South

0

14

22

34

43

54

55

East

0

0

0

0

3

9

9

Total

12

49

88

129

187

260

261

By operating structure

Company owned

12

48

85

123

181

252

253

Sub-franchised

-

1

3

6

6

8

8

Total

12

49

88

129

187

260

261

(5)

Ashika Stock

Broking Limited

Ashika Stock Broking Limited(“ASBL”)started its journey in the year 1994, and is presently offering a wide bouquet of services to its valued clients including broking services, depository services and distributorship of financial products (Mutual funds, IPO & Bonds). It became a“Research Entity” under SEBI (Research Analyst) Regulations 2014 in the year of 2015 (Reg No. INH000000206).

ASBL is a wholly owned subsidiary of Ashika Global Securities (P) Ltd., a RBI registered non-deposit taking NBFC Company. ASHIKA GROUP (details enumerated on our websitewww.ashikagroup.com) is an integrated financial service provider inter alia engaged in the business of Investment Banking, Corporate Lending, Commodity Broking, Debt Syndication & Other Advisory Services.

There were no significant and material disciplinary actions against ASBL taken by any regulatory authority during last three years except routine matters.

Disclosure

Research reports are being prepared and distributed by ASBL in the sole capacity of being a Research Analyst under SEBI (Research Analyst) Regulations 2014. The following disclosures and disclaimer are an essential part of any Research Report so being distributed.

1. ASBL or its associates, its Research Analysts (including their relatives) may have financial interest in the subject company(ies). And, the said financial interest is not limited to having an open stock market position in /acting as advisor to /having a loan transaction with the subject company(ies) apart from registration as clients.

2. ASBL or its Research Analysts (including their relatives) do not have any actual / beneficial ownership of 1% or more of securities of the subject company(ies) at the end of the month immediately preceding the date of publication of the source research report or date of the concerned public appearance. However ASBL's associates may have actual / beneficial ownership of 1% or more of securities of the subject company(ies). 3. ASBL or its Research Analysts (including their relatives) do not have any other material conflict of interest at the time of publication of the source

research report or date of the concerned public appearance. However ASBL's associates might have an actual / potential conflict of interest (other than ownership).

4. ASBL or its associates may have received compensation for investment banking, merchant banking, brokerage services and for other products and services from the subject companies during the preceding 12 months. However, ASBL or its associates or its Research analysts (forming part of Research Desk) have not received any compensation or other benefits from the subject companies or third parties in connection with the research report/ research recommendation. Moreover, Research Analysts have not received any compensation from the companies mentioned in the research report/ recommendation in the past twelve months.

5. The subject companies in the research report/ recommendation may be a client of or may have been a client of ASBL during the twelve months preceding the date of concerned public appearance for investment banking/ merchant banking / brokerage services.

6. ASBL or their Research Analysts have not managed or co–managed public offering of securities for the subject company(ies) in the past twelve months. However ASBL's associates may have managed or co–managed public offering of securities for the subject company(ies) in the past twelve months.

7. Research Analysts have not served as an officer, director or employee of the companies mentioned in the report/ recommendation.

8. Neither ASBL nor its Research Analysts have been engaged in market making activity for the companies mentioned in the report / recommendation.

Disclaimer

The research recommendations and information are solely for the personal information of the authorized recipient and does not construe to be an offer document or any investment, legal or taxation advice or solicitation of any action based upon it. This report is not for public distribution or use by any person or entity, where such distribution, publication, availability or use would be contrary to law, regulation or subject to any registration or licensing requirement. We will not treat recipients as customer by virtue of their receiving this report. The report is based upon the information obtained from public sources that we consider reliable, but we do not guarantee its accuracy or completeness. ASBL shall not be in anyways responsible for any loss or damage that may arise to any such person from any inadvertent error in the information contained in this report. The recipients of this report should rely on their own investigations.

TIRTHAN

KAR DAS

Digitally signed by TIRTHANKAR DAS Date: 2020.12.02 11:28:40 +05'30'

References

Related documents

•ASBL or its Research Analysts (including their relatives) do not have any actual / beneficial ownership of 1% or more of securities of the subject company(ies) at the end of the

•ASBL or its Research Analysts (including their relatives) do not have any actual / beneficial ownership of 1% or more of securities of the subject company(ies) at the end of the

One of the key features of Recovery Manager for Active Directory is the ability to quickly recover individual Group Policy objects using a normal backup of a domain controller’s

Rationale and design of the Cyclosporine to ImpRove Clinical oUtcome in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients (the CIRCUS trial)... teaching and research institutions in France

The unexpected and discordant effects of remote ischaemic conditioning on myocardial infarct size and clinical outcomes in the RIC-STEMI trial 15 might have been due to a type

Option 1: Create a backup of an active directory domain controller then restore that backup new computer (VM or Physical Host) on a disconnected or sandboxed network.. This method

You can use LiteSpeed to first generate the entire database schema script, and then restore individual configuration tables out of the backup.. Thus, you can give developers a

It updates and clarifies tier waiver authority application/designation; Lead Command guidance; inherently governmental functions; publication series descriptions based on