Information Security Office
SAMPLE Risk Assessment and Compliance Report
Restricted Information (RI).Submitted to: SAMPLE CISO CIO CTO
Submitted: SAMPLE DATE
Prepared by: SAMPLE
Appendices attached:
Appendix B: Appendix B – Tenable Server Vulnerability Report.pdf Appendix C: Appendix C – Acunetix Web App Vulnerability Report.pdf Appendix D: Appendix D - Safeguard Implementation Plan Table.xlsx
This sample UCF Risk Assessment and Compliance Report is the sole property of the University of Central Florida. No portion of this document can be used, copied, or reproduced without the University’s consent.
Copyright © 2010 The University of Central Florida
Risk Assessment Compliance Report – Restricted Information (RI). Page 2
Table of Contents
SAMPLE Risk Assessment and Compliance Report ...1
Executive Summary ...4
Introduction ...4
Purpose ...4
Scope ...4
Risk Assessment Approach ...4
Assessment Kickoff and Information Gathering ...4
Overview ...4
Risk Assessment Information Gathering ...4
System Characterization ...4
Overview ...4
System Description ...4
Functional Description ...4
System Environment ...4
System Users ...5
System Dependencies ...5
Information Sensitivity ...5
Protection Requirement Findings ...5
Vulnerability Assessment Results ...5
Overview ...5
Description of the Server Vulnerability Results ...5
Server Name/IP: Server1 / 10.10.10.10 ...6
Server Name/IP: Server2 / 10.10.10.20 ...6
Description of the Compliance Results Data ...7
Server Name/IP: Server1 / 10.10.10.10 ...7
Description of the Web Application Code Alerts / Vulnerabilities ...8
Risk Analysis, Results, and Safeguard Recommendations...9
Overview ...9
Identified Threat Vectors ...9
Risk Results Legend ...9
Risk Assessment Compliance Report – Restricted Information (RI). Page 3
Determining the Weighted Cumulative Risk Scores ...9
Safeguard Recommendations ...9
Risk Assessment Results and Safeguard Recommendations...9
Risk Results: ... 10
Safeguard Implementation Plan/ Results Documentation... 10
Appendix A: Definitions ... 10
Appendix B: Full report of Server Vulnerabilities and Compliance Checks ... 10
Appendix C: Full report of Web Application Code Alerts / Vulnerabilities ... 10
Risk Assessment Compliance Report – Restricted Information (RI). Page 4
Executive Summary
Introduction
Purpose
Scope
Risk Assessment Approach
The ISO conducts risk assessments using an approach outlined in the NIST SP 800-30 guidelines, Risk Management Guide for Information Technology Systems. The assessment recommends appropriate security safeguards
permitting colleges and/or departments and DSCs to make knowledgeable decisions for security related initiatives. The methodology addresses the following types of controls:
Management Controls Operational Controls Technical Controls
Assessment Kickoff and Information Gathering
Overview
This step initiates the risk assessment. The ISO solicits and collects information based on questionnaires, meetings, and other information gathering means.
Risk Assessment Information Gathering
System Characterization
Overview
The intent of this step is to define the boundaries of the IT system.
System Description
This section lists the operation dates and staff involved.
Functional Description
The functional description lists the purpose of the system, the software it runs, dependencies, interfaces, server names, etc.
System Environment
The System Environment section describes physical locations, hardware requirements, network requirements, databases, storage, etc.
Risk Assessment Compliance Report – Restricted Information (RI). Page 5
System Users
System Users lists the primary users of the system.
System Dependencies
This section explains the infrastructure the systems rely on to function.
Information Sensitivity
Finally, the last section under System Characterization lists and assigns sensitivity values to the types of data stored on the system so that proper protection requirements can aid in factoring impact scores.
System Information Types
Information Type Confidentiality Low/Moderate/ High
Integrity
Low/Moderate/ High
Availability
Low/Moderate/ High
Overall Rating
Protection Requirement Findings Confidentiality:
Integrity: Availability:
Vulnerability Assessment Results
Overview
The report bases vulnerability results on several different types of network scanning techniques capable of searching for network and code level vulnerabilities. The tools feature high-speed discovery of configuration auditing, asset profiling, sensitive data, and vulnerability analysis of a college and/or department’s security posture. The descriptions below further detail each section of the results.
Description of the Server Vulnerability Results
The scan assesses each server for vulnerabilities based on NIST and vendor best practices as well as Tenable plugins. The scanned vulnerability results provide a Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) score to aid in prioritizing the remediation steps and in most cases a link to patches, settings, and other remediation
information. The report compiles the compliance checks and vulnerability results into a separate table for each server.
Risk Assessment Compliance Report – Restricted Information (RI). Page 6 Server Name/IP: Server1 / 10.10.10.10
10.10.10.10
Scan Time
Start time : Wed Sep 08 09:42:07 2010 End time : Wed Sep 08 10:00:26 2010 Number of vulnerabilities
Open ports : 1
High : 2
Medium : 2
Low : 0
Remote host information Operating System :
NetBIOS name : Server1 DNS name :
Server Name/IP: Server2 / 10.10.10.20
10.10.10.20
Scan Time
Start time : Wed Sep 08 10:12:46 2010 End time : Wed Sep 08 10:23:30 2010 Number of vulnerabilities
Open ports : 2
High : 1
Medium : 0
Low : 0
Remote host information Operating System :
NetBIOS name : Server2 DNS name :
Risk Assessment Compliance Report – Restricted Information (RI). Page 7
Description of the Compliance Results Data
The scan assesses each server individually for compliance checks based on NIST and vendor best practices as well as tenable plugins. The scan returns policy settings and remote server settings for the systems administrator to compare and resolve. The results provide a compliance chart that indicates the percentage a particular server is in compliance.
Server Name/IP: Server1 / 10.10.10.10
10.10.10.10
Scan Time
Start time : Wed Sep 08 09:42:07 2010 End time : Wed Sep 08 10:00:26 2010 Number of vulnerabilities
Open ports : 1
High : 48
Medium : 19
Passed : 87
Remote host information
Operating System : NetBIOS name : Server1 DNS name :
31%
12% 57%
System Compliance
High : Medium : Passed :
Risk Assessment Compliance Report – Restricted Information (RI). Page 8
Description of the Web Application Code Alerts / Vulnerabilities
The scan assesses the website for vulnerabilities based on OWASP best practices, the Google Hacking Database, and other best practices from vendors. The scanned vulnerability results provide three ratings (High, Medium, and Low) to aid in prioritizing the remediation steps and in most cases a link to patches, settings, and other remediation information.
Scan details for https://SampleInsecureLogin.aspx
Scan information
Starttime 9/7/2010 9:39:00 AM Finish time 9/7/2010 10:34:53 AM Scan time 55 minutes, 53 seconds Profile Default
Server information
Responsive True Server banner
Server OS
Server technologies ASP.NET
Threat level
Acunetix Threat Level 3
One or more high-severity type vulnerabilities have been discovered by the scanner. A malicious user can exploit these vulnerabilities and compromise the backend database and/or deface a website.
Alerts distribution
Total alerts found 70
High 1
Medium 3
Low 2
Informational 64
Executive summary
Alert group Severity Alert count
SSL 2.0 deprecated protocol High 1
ASP.NET application trace enabled Medium 1
TLS1/SSLv3 Renegotiation Vulnerability Medium 1
Login page password-guessing attack Low 1
Possible sensitive directories Low 1
Risk Assessment Compliance Report – Restricted Information (RI). Page 9
Risk Analysis, Results, and Safeguard Recommendations
Overview
Risk analysis is the process of establishing a method to rate the severity, impact, and likelihood of an exploitable risk.
Identified Threat Vectors
The NIST risk-scoring model pairs the risks with appropriate threats. Each threat receives a risk score based on its likelihood and impact ratings
Risk Results Legend
OverviewThe risk results legend briefly explains how to interpret the risk results: (likelihood, impact, weighted cumulative risk scores, and safeguards).
Determining the Weighted Cumulative Risk Scores
The risk formula calculates each threat vector’s individual score, weights each score, and combines the scores resulting in an assigned risk value and overall risk severity rating. Possible risk scores range from 1 to 101.08. Risk Score Range Table
Risk Scores Risk Score Range
Note 1-4.99
Low 5-24.99
Moderate 25-69.99
High 70-101.08
Safeguard Recommendations
Risk Assessment Results and Safeguard Recommendations
The top line of each risk contains the risk number, the location and/or question number where the risk was identified, and the risk description. Following the top line is a list of threat vectors capable of exploiting the risk, their likelihood and impact scores, and the overall risk rating. Included at the bottom of each risk is a list of recommended safeguards to mitigate or reduce risk.
Risk Assessment Compliance Report –
Restricted Information (RI).
Page 10
Risk Results:Risk #1: Question D8 The system does not have a "hot" standby site to prevent downtime.
Threat Vectors Likelihood Impact Risk
Acts of nature Low Moderate Low
Hazardous conditions Low Low Note
Dependency failures Low Moderate Low
Errors and omissions Moderate Moderate Moderate
Physical intrusion and/or theft Low High Low
Overall Risk Severity (Low, Moderate, High) Moderate
Overall Risk Score (1~101.08) 25
Recommended Safeguard(s):
S1 Arrange a "Hot Site" recovery location where servers have the installed programs needed to bring the application online quickly.
S2 Develop, document, test, and practice a restore and recovery plan.
Safeguard Implementation Plan/ Results Documentation
Appendix A: Definitions
Appendix B: Full report of Server Vulnerabilities and Compliance Checks
See attached file: Appendix B – Tenable Server Vulnerability Report.pdf
Appendix C: Full report of Web Application Code Alerts / Vulnerabilities
See attached file: Appendix C – Acunetix Web App Vulnerability Report.pdf