• No results found

Case 1:13-cv RBJ Document 12 Filed 03/18/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Case 1:13-cv RBJ Document 12 Filed 03/18/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO"

Copied!
5
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-00563-RBJ-BNB

W. L. (BILL) ARMSTRONG;

JEFFREY S. MAY;

WILLIAM L. (WIL) ARMSTRONG III;

JOHN A. MAY;

DOROTHY A. SHANAHAN; and

CHERRY CREEK MORTGAGE CO., INC.,

a Colorado corporation,

Plaintiffs,

v.

KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, in her official capacity as

Secretary of the United States Department of Health

and Human Services; SETH D. HARRIS, in his official capacity

as Acting Secretary of the United States Department of Labor;

JACOB J. LEW, in his official capacity as Secretary of the

United States Department of the Treasury; the UNITED

STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN

SERVICES; the UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR;

and the UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY,

Defendants.

MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

and CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE RE: CONSULTATION ON MOTION

ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED

PLAINTIFFS W. L. (BILL) ARMSTRONG, JEFFREY S. MAY, WILLIAM L. (WIL)

ARMSTRONG III, JOHN A. MAY, DOROTHY A. SHANAHAN, and CHERRY CREEK

MORTGAGE CO., INC., a Colorado corporation, by and through their attorneys Michael J.

Norton and the undersigned attorneys of Alliance Defending Freedom and Natalie L. Decker of

the Law Office of Natalie L. Decker, LLC, hereby move the Court to enter a preliminary

injunction in favor of the Plaintiffs and, in support hereof, state as follows:

(2)

2

1.

As is evident from Plaintiffs’ Verified Complaint, Plaintiffs W. L. (Bill) Armstrong, Jeffrey

S. May, William L. (Wil) Armstrong III, John A, May, and Dorothy A. Shanahan, are all of

the voting shareholders of Plaintiff Cherry Creek Mortgage Co., a Colorado corporation

which operates, pursuant to the Internal Revenue Code, as an S-corporation.

2.

Each of the individual Plaintiffs is a believing and practicing Evangelical Christian. Contrary

to their sincerely held religious beliefs in opposition to abortion, the employee health plan

benefits they provide to employees of the company they own and manage, i.e., Plaintiff

Cherry Creek Mortgage Co., Inc., is required, pursuant to the Patient Protection and

Affordable Care Act, Pub. L. No. 111-148 (Mar. 23, 2010) (the “ACA”), to include coverage,

under pain of penalty, of abortion-inducing drugs, abortion-inducing intrauterine devices, and

related patient education and counseling (the “HHS Mandate”).

3.

Plaintiffs request a preliminary injunction against the Defendants and their HHS Mandate as

it violates Plaintiffs sincerely held religious beliefs and is thus a violation of the Religious

Freedom Restoration Act and the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

4.

In the event the Court is not inclined to grant the motion as requested, Plaintiffs request that

Court set the matter for oral argument on a date and at a time convenient to the Court and

opposing counsel.

5.

Certificate of Compliance. Pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1A, Attorney Michael J. Norton,

one of the attorneys for the Plaintiffs, certifies that he has, before the filing of this Motion for

Preliminary Injunction, consulted and conferred with attorneys for the Defendants, to wit:

Michelle R. Bennett, Trial Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division, Federal

Programs Branch, Washington, D.C. (202-305-8902). Ms. Bennett advised that the

(3)

3

Defendants do not believe oral argument is necessary, but do not oppose oral argument if the

Court believes it would be helpful to the Court.

6.

In support of this motion, Plaintiffs submit an accompanying brief.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs respectfully plead as aforesaid and, in the event the Court does not

grant the motion for preliminary injunction as filed, request that oral argument be scheduled on

their motion on a date and at a time convenient to the Court and counsel.

Respectfully submitted this 15

th

day of March, 2013.

Attorneys for Plaintiffs:

s/ Michael J. Norton

Michael J. Norton

ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM

7951 E. Maplewood Avenue, Suite 100

Greenwood Village, CO 80111

(O) 720-689-2410

(F) 303-694-0703

mjnorton@alliancedefendingfreedom.org

Steven H. Aden

Matthew S. Bowman

ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM

801 G Street, NW, Suite 509

Washington, DC 20001

Tel.: 202-393-8690

Fax: 202-347-3622

saden@alliancedefendingfreedom.org

mbowman@alliancedefendingfreedom.org

(4)

4

David A. Cortman

ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM

1000 Hurricane Shoals Road NE

Suite D-1100

Lawrenceville, GA 30043

Tel.: 770-339-0774

Fax.: 770-339-6744

dcortman@alliancedefendingfreedom.org

and

Natalie L. Decker

The Law Office of Natalie L. Decker, LLC

26 W. Dry Creek Cr., Suite 600

Littleton, CO 80120

(O) 303-730-3009

(F) 303-484-5631

(5)

5

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I

, Michael J. Norton, hereby certify that on the 15

th

day of March, 2013, I caused the

foregoing motion to be electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system

which will send notification of such filing to all attorneys of record, to wit:

saden@alliancedefendingfreedom.org

mbowman@alliancedefendingfreedom.org

dcortman@alliancedefendingfreedom.org

natalie@denverlawsolutions.com

Michelle.Bennett@usdoj.gov

s/ Michael J. Norton

Michael J. Norton

References

Related documents

Once the initial seeder has created a torrent and uploaded it onto one or more torrent sites, then other peers begin to download and upload the computer file to which the

In the absence of the injunction sought herein, Defendants will continue to deny appropriate auxiliary aids and services necessary to ensure effective communication, including

All individual Defendants to this claim, at all times relevant hereto, were acting under the color of state law in their capacity as security personnel and officials of D-2 and their

awarding HugeDomains its damages caused by APA’ knowing and material misrepresentation that the <austinpain.com> domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark

Subject to the prior agreement of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Colorado, which approval has been obtained, see Exhibit A attached hereto, Plaintiffs and the

Defendant Apple is further responsible for the indirect infringement of the ‘809 Patent by providing products to customers, (a) inducing infringement by instructing its respective

WHEREAS, on September 11, 2012, Plaintiffs moved to amend their Complaint to challenge thirty-one additional projects approved by the BLM using EAs that also relied upon the

Who will help, air national guard age waiver, and much do i am hired for enlistment based upon graduation or reserve.?. waivers but the guard waiver completed and