• No results found

Overall Achievement (Grade 3) Percent at Levels 3 and 4. Overall Achievement (Grade 6) Percent at Levels 3 and 4

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Overall Achievement (Grade 3) Percent at Levels 3 and 4. Overall Achievement (Grade 6) Percent at Levels 3 and 4"

Copied!
14
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Of the students said they speak only or mostly in a language other than English at home

Demographics (Grade 3)

School(s) with Grade 3 classes Class(es) with Grade 3 students Grade 3 students

In English as a Second Language Program (ESL) Exempted in all three subjects

Boys Girls

Of the students said they speak as often in English as in another language at home 1 0% 47% 3 6% 0% 66 53% 15% 6%

Grade 3 and Grade 6 Assessments of Reading, Writing and Mathematics, 2001-2002

School Results

Board:

Toronto Catholic District School Board (067059)

School:

St Fidelis S (789917)

Gender not specified Receiving Special Education Support

11%

Of the students said they speak only or mostly in a language other than English at home

Demographics (Grade 6)

School(s) with Grade 6 classes Class(es) with Grade 6 students Grade 6 students

In English as a Second Language Program (ESL) Exempted in all three subjects

Boys Girls

Of the students said they speak as often in English as in another language at home 1 12% 60% 3 6% 0% 50 40% 16% 4%

Gender not specified Receiving Special Education Support

18%

33

Overall Achievement (Grade 3)

Percent at Levels 3 and 4

Number of Students

Method 2

Method 1

Writing

Reading

Mathematics

50%

57%

55%

58%

50%

53%

36

33

24

Overall Achievement (Grade 6)

Percent at Levels 3 and 4

Number of Students

Method 2

Method 1

Writing

Reading

Mathematics

48%

51%

54%

57%

60%

64%

27

30

(2)

Explanation of Terms and Categories

Receiving Special

This designation is for students whose Student Information Form (SIF) indicated that they were formally identified by an

Identification,

Education Support:

Placement and Review Committee (IPRC), as well as those students who though not formally identified, received special

education support as noted on their Individual Education Plan (IEP).

Exempt:

This designation is for students who were formally exempted from participation in one or more component of the assessment.

No data:

This refers to non-exempt students from whom EQAO did not receive completed assessment booklets.

NEIS:

(Not Enough Information to Score) This designation is for student work that is deemed to be insufficient to be assigned a level of

achievement in a given category or strand within a subject, on the multiple-choice component or for overall achievement. This is

the case if large sections of work are missing due to absence or other reasons.

NE1:

(Not Enough Evidence for Level 1) This is the reporting designation for students who have provided enough information to score

but have not demonstrated enough evidence of knowledge and understanding to be assigned Level 1.

Levels 1-4:

EQAO's four-level marking scale is aligned with the four-level scale used on the Ontario Student Report Card, and sets Level 3 as

the provincial standard.

Explanation of Methods

Method 1:

All data are reported. Method 1 expresses the number of students achieving at each level, as a percentage of all students in the

grade, including students who were exempted and those whose work on the assessment did not produce enough information to

score. EQAO uses Method 1 for reporting because publicly funded schools are accountable for the achievement and progress of

all students. Schools and boards are required to use this method to ensure consistency of reporting across the province.

Method 2:

An alternative way of presenting the data. Method 2 expresses the distribution of student results as a percentage of those

students who actually took part in the assessment and produced work that could be scored. Students who were exempt, or for

whom there is no performance data, are excluded. Method 2 highlights the results achieved by students who have scorable work.

Notes

- Gender differences may not be precise, since gender was not specified on some Student Information Forms (SIF).

- Percentages may not sum to 100 due to rounding.

- In reading and writing, the overall level of achievement is calculated using students' scores in the categories and in the multiple-choice component. In

mathematics, the overall level of achievement is calculated using students' scores in categories and strands and in the multiple-choice component.

- Overall scores are adjusted for year-to-year differences in assessments.

(3)

1 Percentages may not sum to 100 due to rounding. 2 Not Enough Information to Score

3 Not Enough Evidence for Level 1

Board:

Toronto Catholic District School Board (067059)

School:

St Fidelis S (789917)

Grade 3 and Grade 6 Assessments of Reading, Writing and Mathematics, 2001-2002

School Results

Overall Level of Achievement in Writing Grade 3 No Data Exempt NE1 3 NEIS 2 Level 2 Level 1 Level 4 Level 3 Method 1 Percent 1 Number Method 2 4 0 5 0 0 21 33 3 6% 0% 8% 0% 0% 32% 50% 5% N/A N/A 8% 0% 0% 34% 53% 5%

Overall Level of Achievement in Mathematics Grade 3 No Data Exempt NE1 3 NEIS 2 Level 2 Level 1 Level 4 Level 3 Method 1 Percent 1 Number Method 2 4 0 5 1 2 21 30 3 6% 0% 8% 2% 3% 32% 45% 5% N/A N/A 8% 2% 3% 34% 48% 5% Overall Level of Achievement in Reading

Grade 3 No Data Exempt NE1 3 NEIS 2 Level 2 Level 1 Level 4 Level 3 Method 1 Percent 1 Number Method 2 8 0 4 0 7 14 30 3 12% 0% 6% 0% 11% 21% 45% 5% N/A N/A 7% 0% 12% 24% 52% 5%

Overall Level of Achievement in Writing Grade 6 No Data Exempt NE1 3 NEIS 2 Level 2 Level 1 Level 4 Level 3 Method 1 Percent 1 Number Method 2 3 0 1 0 4 15 23 4 6% 0% 2% 0% 8% 30% 46% 8% N/A N/A 2% 0% 9% 32% 49% 9% Overall Level of Achievement in Reading

Grade 6 No Data Exempt NE1 3 NEIS 2 Level 2 Level 1 Level 4 Level 3 Method 1 Percent 1 Number Method 2 3 0 4 0 0 19 16 8 6% 0% 8% 0% 0% 38% 32% 16% N/A N/A 9% 0% 0% 40% 34% 17%

Overall Level of Achievement in Mathematics Grade 6 No Data Exempt NE1 3 NEIS 2 Level 2 Level 1 Level 4 Level 3 Method 1 Percent 1 Number Method 2 3 0 2 0 2 13 17 13 6% 0% 4% 0% 4% 26% 34% 26% N/A N/A 4% 0% 4% 28% 36% 28%

(4)

Grade 3 Results: Detailed Overall Achievement

1 Not Enough Information to Score 2 Not Enough Evidence for Level 1

Reading Overall , Method 1

No Data Exempt NE1 2 NEIS 1 Level 2 Level 1 Level 4 Level 3 Board Results n=7 063 School Results n=66 7% <1% 6% <1% 11% 28% 42% 6% 12% 0% 6% 0% 11% 21% 45% 5%

Reading Overall , Method 2

NE1 2 NEIS 1 Level 2 Level 1 Level 4 Level 3 Board Results n=6 567 School Results n=58 6% <1% 12% 30% 46% 6% 7% 0% 12% 24% 52% 5%

Writing Overall , Method 1

No Data Exempt NE1 2 NEIS 1 Level 2 Level 1 Level 4 Level 3 Board Results n=7 063 School Results n=66 6% <1% 3% <1% 2% 30% 48% 10% 6% 0% 8% 0% 0% 32% 50% 5%

Writing Overall , Method 2

NE1 2 NEIS 1 Level 2 Level 1 Level 4 Level 3 Board Results n=6 591 School Results n=62 3% <1% 2% 32% 52% 10% 8% 0% 0% 34% 53% 5%

Mathematics Overall , Method 1

No Data Exempt NE1 2 NEIS 1 Level 2 Level 1 Level 4 Level 3 Board Results n=7 186 School Results n=66 6% <1% 5% <1% 6% 27% 46% 10% 6% 0% 8% 2% 3% 32% 45% 5%

Mathematics Overall , Method 2

NE1 2 NEIS 1 Level 2 Level 1 Level 4 Level 3 Board Results n=6 757 School Results n=62 5% <1% 7% 29% 48% 10% 8% 2% 3% 34% 48% 5%

(5)

Grade 3 Results: Detailed Reading Achievement in Categories, Method 2

Grade 3 Results: Detailed Writing Achievement in Categories, Method 2

Grade 3 Results: Detailed Mathematics Achievement in Categories, Method 2

Grade 3 Results: Detailed Mathematics Achievement in Strands, Method 2

Board Results n=6 467 School Results n=57 9.7 /20 9.1 /20 Communication Board Results n=6 429 School Results n=56 8.8 /20 9.0 /20 Organization of Ideas Board Results n=6 494 School Results n=56 10.9 /20 11.2 /20 Application of Conventions Board Results n=6 439 School Results n=57 9.4 /20 9.6 /20 Reasoning Average score Board Results n=6 554 School Results n=63 5.2 /8 5.1 /8 Organization of Ideas Board Results n=6 554 School Results n=63 5.3 /8 5.0 /8 Communication Board Results n=6 553 School Results n=63 5.1 /8 4.7 /8 Reasoning Average score Board Results n=6 556 School Results n=63 5.4 /8 5.5 /8 Application of Conventions Board Results n=6 666 School Results n=59 10.3 /20 9.5 /20 Understanding of Concepts Board Results n=6 720 School Results n=62 11.2 /20 10.8 /20 Application of Mathematical Procedures Board Results n=6 640 School Results n=59 9.3 /20 8.0 /20 Problem Solving Average score Board Results n=6 704 School Results n=61 9.0 /20 7.8 /20 Communication of Required Knowledge Board Results n=6 674 School Results n=62 12.0 /24 11.6 /24 Measurement Board Results n=6 648 School Results n=59 13.2 /24 11.7 /24 Number Sense and Numeration

Average score Board Results n=6 691 School Results n=60 14.2 /24 13.9 /24 Geometry and Spatial Sense

Board Results n=6 709 School Results n=62 13.4 /24 13.7 /24 Patterning and Algebra

Board Results n=6 709 School Results n=62 13.4 /24 13.7 /24 Data Management and Probability

(6)

Grade 6 Results: Detailed Overall Achievement

1 Not Enough Information to Score 2 Not Enough Evidence for Level 1

Reading Overall , Method 1

No Data Exempt NE1 2 NEIS 1 Level 2 Level 1 Level 4 Level 3 Board Results n=7 046 School Results n=50 5% <1% 6% <1% 8% 26% 45% 10% 6% 0% 8% 0% 0% 38% 32% 16%

Reading Overall , Method 2

NE1 2 NEIS 1 Level 2 Level 1 Level 4 Level 3 Board Results n=6 688 School Results n=47 6% <1% 8% 28% 47% 11% 9% 0% 0% 40% 34% 17%

Writing Overall , Method 1

No Data Exempt NE1 2 NEIS 1 Level 2 Level 1 Level 4 Level 3 Board Results n=7 046 School Results n=50 5% <1% 3% <1% 6% 31% 43% 11% 6% 0% 2% 0% 8% 30% 46% 8%

Writing Overall , Method 2

NE1 2 NEIS 1 Level 2 Level 1 Level 4 Level 3 Board Results n=6 696 School Results n=47 4% <1% 7% 33% 45% 12% 2% 0% 9% 32% 49% 9%

Mathematics Overall , Method 1

No Data Exempt NE1 2 NEIS 1 Level 2 Level 1 Level 4 Level 3 Board Results n=7 046 School Results n=50 5% <1% 6% <1% 11% 27% 38% 14% 6% 0% 4% 0% 4% 26% 34% 26%

Mathematics Overall , Method 2

NE1 2 NEIS 1 Level 2 Level 1 Level 4 Level 3 Board Results n=6 705 School Results n=47 6% <1% 11% 28% 40% 15% 4% 0% 4% 28% 36% 28%

(7)

Grade 6 Results: Detailed Reading Achievement in Categories, Method 2

Grade 6 Results: Detailed Writing Achievement in Categories, Method 2

Grade 6 Results: Detailed Mathematics Achievement in Categories, Method 2

Grade 6 Results: Detailed Mathematics Achievement in Strands, Method 2

Board Results n=6 567 School Results n=46 10.6 /20 10.8 /20 Communication Board Results n=6 628 School Results n=47 10.7 /20 11.5 /20 Organization of Ideas Board Results n=6 553 School Results n=46 10.2 /20 11.7 /20 Application of Conventions Board Results n=6 541 School Results n=46 11.0 /20 11.2 /20 Reasoning Average score Board Results n=6 601 School Results n=47 5.0 /8 4.8 /8 Organization of Ideas Board Results n=6 606 School Results n=47 5.1 /8 4.8 /8 Communication Board Results n=6 599 School Results n=47 4.9 /8 4.7 /8 Reasoning Average score Board Results n=6 607 School Results n=47 5.3 /8 5.1 /8 Application of Conventions Board Results n=6 618 School Results n=47 11.4 /20 12.1 /20 Understanding of Concepts Board Results n=6 595 School Results n=46 11.6 /20 13.3 /20 Application of Mathematical Procedures Board Results n=6 632 School Results n=47 9.9 /20 12.2 /20 Communication of Required Knowledge Board Results n=6 613 School Results n=46 10.1 /20 10.8 /20 Problem Solving Average score Board Results n=6 608 School Results n=46 13.0 /24 14.7 /24 Measurement Board Results n=6 627 School Results n=47 13.9 /24 14.6 /24 Geometry and Spatial Sense Board Results n=6 643 School Results n=47 13.9 /24 15.1 /24 Number Sense and Numeration

Average score Board Results n=6 591 School Results n=46 13.6 /24 14.1 /24 Patterning and Algebra

Board Results n=6 591 School Results n=46 13.6 /24 14.1 /24 Data Management and Probability

(8)

Grade 3 Achievement Results by Contextual Factors

1 Not Enough Information to Score 2 Not Enough Evidence for Level 1

Results by Gender

*

* Results for gender are based upon students for whom gender data were available.

Reading Overall, Method 1

No Data Exempt NE12 NEIS1 Level 2 Level 1 Level 4 Level 3 5% <1% 5% <1% 10% 28% 45% 7%

Reading Overall, Method 2

NE12 NEIS1 Level 2 Level 1 Level 4 Level 3

Board Results School Results

5% <1% 10% 29% 47% 7% 8% <1% 6% <1% 12% 28% 40% 4% 10% 0% 3% 0% 6% 26% 48% 6% 14% 0% 9% 0% 14% 17% 43% 3% 7% <1% 13% 31% 44% 5% 4% 0% 7% 29% 54% 7% 10% 0% 17% 20% 50% 3% Board Results School Results

Girls

n=3 455 n=3 584 Boys n=31 Girls Boys n=35 n=3 265 Girls n=3 282 Boys n=28 Girls Boys n=30

Writing Overall, Method 1

No Data Exempt NE12 NEIS1 Level 2 Level 1 Level 4 Level 3 5% <1% 2% <1% 2% 26% 52% 13%

Writing Overall, Method 2

NE12 NEIS1 Level 2 Level 1 Level 4 Level 3

Board Results School Results

2% <1% 2% 28% 55% 14% 8% <1% 3% <1% 3% 34% 45% 7% 3% 0% 10% 0% 0% 23% 58% 6% 9% 0% 6% 0% 0% 40% 43% 3% 4% <1% 3% 37% 49% 7% 10% 0% 0% 23% 60% 7% 6% 0% 0% 44% 47% 3% Board Results School Results

Girls

n=3 455 n=3 584 Boys n=31 Girls Boys n=35 n=3 273 Girls n=3 298 Boys n=30 Girls Boys n=32

Mathematics Overall, Method 1

No Data Exempt NE12 NEIS1 Level 2 Level 1 Level 4 Level 3 5% <1% 4% <1% 6% 28% 47% 9%

Mathematics Overall, Method 2

NE12 NEIS1 Level 2 Level 1 Level 4 Level 3

Board Results School Results

5% <1% 7% 30% 49% 10% 7% <1% 5% <1% 6% 27% 45% 10% 3% 0% 3% 3% 6% 42% 35% 6% 9% 0% 11% 0% 0% 23% 54% 3% 5% <1% 6% 29% 48% 11% 3% 3% 7% 43% 37% 7% 12% 0% 0% 25% 59% 3% Board Results School Results

Girls

(9)

Grade 3 Achievement Results by Contextual Factors, cont'd

Results by Results by English as a Second Language/English Literacy Development

Reading Overall, Method 1

No Data Exempt NE12 NEIS1 Level 2 Level 1 Level 4 Level 3 47% 2% 3% 1% 13% 15% 18% 1%

Reading Overall, Method 2

NE12 NEIS1 Level 2 Level 1 Level 4 Level 3

Board Results School Results

6% 2% 25% 29% 36% 2% 5% <1% 6% <1% 11% 28% 43% 6% 12% 0% 6% 0% 11% 21% 45% 5% 6% <1% 11% 30% 46% 6% 7% 0% 12% 24% 52% 5% Board Results School Results

In ESL/ELD

n=249 All Other Students In ESL/ELD n=0 n=6 814

All Other Students n=66

In ESL/ELD

n=127 All Other Students In ESL/ELD n=0 n=6 440

All Other Students n=58

Writing Overall, Method 1

No Data Exempt NE12 NEIS1 Level 2 Level 1 Level 4 Level 3 43% 2% 2% 0% 6% 26% 19% 2%

Writing Overall, Method 2

NE12 NEIS1 Level 2 Level 1 Level 4 Level 3

Board Results School Results

4% 0% 12% 47% 34% 3% 5% <1% 3% <1% 2% 30% 50% 10% 6% 0% 8% 0% 0% 32% 50% 5% 3% <1% 2% 32% 52% 11% 8% 0% 0% 34% 53% 5% Board Results School Results

In ESL/ELD

n=249 All Other Students In ESL/ELD n=0 n=6 814

All Other Students n=66

In ESL/ELD

n=137 All Other Students In ESL/ELD n=0 n=6 454

All Other Students n=62

Mathematics Overall, Method 1

No Data Exempt NE12 NEIS1 Level 2 Level 1 Level 4 Level 3 37% 2% 5% 1% 8% 18% 24% 5%

Mathematics Overall, Method 2

NE12 NEIS1 Level 2 Level 1 Level 4 Level 3

Board Results School Results

8% 2% 13% 29% 40% 8% 5% <1% 5% <1% 6% 28% 46% 10% 6% 0% 8% 2% 3% 32% 45% 5% 5% <1% 6% 29% 49% 10% 8% 2% 3% 34% 48% 5% Board Results School Results

In ESL/ELD

n=249 All Other Students In ESL/ELD n=0 n=6 937

All Other Students n=66

In ESL/ELD

n=152 All Other Students In ESL/ELD n=0 n=6 605

All Other Students n=62

(10)

Grade 3 Achievement Results by Contextual Factors, cont'd

1 Not Enough Information to Score 2 Not Enough Evidence for Level 1

Results for Students with Special Needs (excluding Gifted and Enriched)

Reading Overall, Method 1

No Data Exempt NE12 NEIS1 Level 2 Level 1 Level 4 Level 3 35% 1% 9% 1% 20% 23% 10% 1%

Reading Overall, Method 2

NE12 NEIS1 Level 2 Level 1 Level 4 Level 3

Board Results School Results

14% 2% 31% 36% 15% 1% 2% <1% 5% <1% 10% 29% 48% 6% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2% 0% 7% 0% 12% 24% 51% 5% 5% <1% 10% 29% 49% 7% 7% 0% 12% 24% 52% 5% Board Results School Results

Special Needs n=954 Special Needs n=7 All Other Students n=6 109 All Other Students n=59 Special Needs n=614 Special Needs n=0 All Other Students n=5 953 All Other Students n=58

Writing Overall, Method 1

No Data Exempt NE12 NEIS1 Level 2 Level 1 Level 4 Level 3 33% 1% 7% 1% 8% 38% 12% 1%

Writing Overall, Method 2

NE12 NEIS1 Level 2 Level 1 Level 4 Level 3

Board Results School Results

10% 1% 12% 58% 18% 1% 2% <1% 2% 0% 1% 29% 54% 11% 43% 0% 57% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2% 0% 2% 0% 0% 36% 56% 5% 2% 0% 1% 30% 56% 11% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2% 0% 0% 36% 57% 5% Board Results School Results

Special Needs n=954 Special Needs n=7 All Other Students n=6 109 All Other Students n=59 Special Needs n=631 Special Needs n=4 All Other Students n=5 960 All Other Students n=58

Mathematics Overall, Method 1

No Data Exempt NE12 NEIS1 Level 2 Level 1 Level 4 Level 3 31% 1% 5% 1% 13% 30% 17% 2%

Mathematics Overall, Method 2

NE12 NEIS1 Level 2 Level 1 Level 4 Level 3

Board Results School Results

8% 2% 19% 44% 24% 3% 2% <1% 5% <1% 5% 27% 50% 11% 43% 0% 0% 0% 0% 57% 0% 0% 2% 0% 8% 2% 3% 29% 51% 5% 5% <1% 5% 28% 51% 11% 0% 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 9% 2% 3% 29% 52% 5% Board Results School Results

Special Needs n=957 Special Needs n=7 All Other Students n=6 229 All Other Students n=59 Special Needs n=657 Special Needs n=4 All Other Students n=6 100 All Other Students n=58

(11)

Grade 3 Achievement Results by Contextual Factors, cont'd

Results for Students in French Immersion

3 Includes French Immersion students who wrote the reading and writing components in English (Options A and B). Does not include French

Reading3 Overall, Method 1

No Data Exempt NE12 NEIS1 Level 2 Level 1 Level 4 Level 3

Reading3 Overall, Method 2

NE12 NEIS1 Level 2 Level 1 Level 4 Level 3

Board Results School Results

7% <1% 6% <1% 11% 28% 42% 6% 12% 0% 6% 0% 11% 21% 45% 5% 6% <1% 12% 30% 46% 6% 7% 0% 12% 24% 52% 5% Board Results School Results

French Immersion n=0 French Immersion n=0 All Other Students n=7 063 All Other Students n=66 French Immersion n=0 French Immersion n=0 All Other Students n=6 567 All Other Students n=58

Writing3 Overall, Method 1

No Data Exempt NE12 NEIS1 Level 2 Level 1 Level 4 Level 3

Writing3 Overall, Method 2

NE12 NEIS1 Level 2 Level 1 Level 4 Level 3

Board Results School Results

6% <1% 3% <1% 2% 30% 48% 10% 6% 0% 8% 0% 0% 32% 50% 5% 3% <1% 2% 32% 52% 10% 8% 0% 0% 34% 53% 5% Board Results School Results

French Immersion n=0 French Immersion n=0 All Other Students n=7 063 All Other Students n=66 French Immersion n=0 French Immersion n=0 All Other Students n=6 591 All Other Students n=62

Mathematics4 Overall, Method 1

No Data Exempt NE12 NEIS1 Level 2 Level 1 Level 4 Level 3 0% 1% 8% 0% 2% 15% 63% 11%

Mathematics4 Overall, Method 2

NE12 NEIS1 Level 2 Level 1 Level 4 Level 3

Board Results School Results

8% 0% 2% 16% 64% 11% 6% <1% 5% <1% 6% 28% 45% 10% 6% 0% 8% 2% 3% 32% 45% 5% 5% <1% 7% 29% 48% 10% 8% 2% 3% 34% 48% 5% Board Results School Results

French Immersion n=123 French Immersion n=0 All Other Students n=7 063 All Other Students n=66 French Immersion n=122 French Immersion n=0 All Other Students n=6 635 All Other Students n=62

(12)

Grade 6 Achievement Results by Contextual Factors

1 Not Enough Information to Score 2 Not Enough Evidence for Level 1

Results by Gender

*

* Results for gender are based upon students for whom gender data were available.

Reading Overall, Method 1

No Data Exempt NE12 NEIS1 Level 2 Level 1 Level 4 Level 3 4% <1% 4% <1% 6% 24% 49% 14%

Reading Overall, Method 2

NE12 NEIS1 Level 2 Level 1 Level 4 Level 3

Board Results School Results

4% <1% 6% 24% 51% 14% 6% <1% 7% 1% 10% 29% 41% 7% 7% 0% 7% 0% 0% 27% 40% 20% 5% 0% 10% 0% 0% 55% 20% 10% 8% 1% 10% 31% 43% 7% 7% 0% 0% 29% 43% 21% 11% 0% 0% 58% 21% 11% Board Results School Results

Girls

n=3 529 n=3 485 Boys n=30 Girls Boys n=20 n=3 392 Girls n=3 271 Boys n=28 Girls Boys n=19

Writing Overall, Method 1

No Data Exempt NE12 NEIS1 Level 2 Level 1 Level 4 Level 3 4% <1% 2% <1% 4% 28% 47% 15%

Writing Overall, Method 2

NE12 NEIS1 Level 2 Level 1 Level 4 Level 3

Board Results School Results

2% <1% 4% 29% 49% 16% 6% <1% 4% <1% 9% 35% 38% 7% 7% 0% 3% 0% 3% 20% 57% 10% 5% 0% 0% 0% 15% 45% 30% 5% 5% <1% 10% 38% 41% 7% 4% 0% 4% 21% 61% 11% 0% 0% 16% 47% 32% 5% Board Results School Results

Girls

n=3 529 n=3 485 Boys n=30 Girls Boys n=20 n=3 397 Girls n=3 274 Boys n=28 Girls Boys n=19

Mathematics Overall, Method 1

No Data Exempt NE12 NEIS1 Level 2 Level 1 Level 4 Level 3 4% <1% 5% <1% 10% 28% 39% 15%

Mathematics Overall, Method 2

NE12 NEIS1 Level 2 Level 1 Level 4 Level 3

Board Results School Results

5% <1% 10% 29% 40% 15% 6% <1% 6% <1% 11% 25% 37% 14% 7% 0% 0% 0% 3% 23% 37% 30% 5% 0% 10% 0% 5% 30% 30% 20% 7% <1% 12% 27% 39% 15% 0% 0% 4% 25% 39% 32% 11% 0% 5% 32% 32% 21% Board Results School Results

Girls

(13)

Grade 6 Achievement Results by Contextual Factors, cont'd

Results by Results by English as a Second Language/English Literacy Development

Reading Overall, Method 1

No Data Exempt NE12 NEIS1 Level 2 Level 1 Level 4 Level 3 27% 1% 10% 2% 19% 25% 13% 2%

Reading Overall, Method 2

NE12 NEIS1 Level 2 Level 1 Level 4 Level 3

Board Results School Results

14% 3% 26% 35% 18% 3% 4% <1% 5% <1% 7% 26% 46% 11% 33% 0% 17% 0% 0% 50% 0% 0% 2% 0% 7% 0% 0% 36% 36% 18% 6% <1% 7% 27% 48% 11% 25% 0% 0% 75% 0% 0% 7% 0% 0% 37% 37% 19% Board Results School Results

In ESL/ELD

n=353 All Other Students In ESL/ELD n=6 n=6 693

All Other Students n=44

In ESL/ELD

n=254 All Other Students In ESL/ELD n=4 n=6 434

All Other Students n=43

Writing Overall, Method 1

No Data Exempt NE12 NEIS1 Level 2 Level 1 Level 4 Level 3 26% 1% 5% <1% 20% 33% 13% 1%

Writing Overall, Method 2

NE12 NEIS1 Level 2 Level 1 Level 4 Level 3

Board Results School Results

7% <1% 28% 46% 18% 1% 4% <1% 3% <1% 6% 31% 44% 12% 33% 0% 0% 0% 50% 17% 0% 0% 2% 0% 2% 0% 2% 32% 52% 9% 3% <1% 6% 33% 46% 12% 0% 0% 75% 25% 0% 0% 2% 0% 2% 33% 53% 9% Board Results School Results

In ESL/ELD

n=353 All Other Students In ESL/ELD n=6 n=6 693

All Other Students n=44

In ESL/ELD

n=257 All Other Students In ESL/ELD n=4 n=6 439

All Other Students n=43

Mathematics Overall, Method 1

No Data Exempt NE12 NEIS1 Level 2 Level 1 Level 4 Level 3 24% 1% 8% 1% 22% 23% 16% 4%

Mathematics Overall, Method 2

NE12 NEIS1 Level 2 Level 1 Level 4 Level 3

Board Results School Results

11% 2% 29% 31% 22% 6% 4% <1% 5% <1% 10% 27% 39% 15% 33% 0% 17% 0% 17% 33% 0% 0% 2% 0% 2% 0% 2% 25% 39% 30% 6% <1% 10% 28% 41% 15% 25% 0% 25% 50% 0% 0% 2% 0% 2% 26% 40% 30% Board Results School Results

In ESL/ELD

n=353 All Other Students In ESL/ELD n=6 n=6 693

All Other Students n=44

In ESL/ELD

n=265 All Other Students In ESL/ELD n=4 n=6 440

All Other Students n=43

(14)

Grade 6 Achievement Results by Contextual Factors, cont'd

1 Not Enough Information to Score 2 Not Enough Evidence for Level 1

Results for Students with Special Needs (excluding Gifted and Enriched)

Reading Overall, Method 1

No Data Exempt NE12 NEIS1 Level 2 Level 1 Level 4 Level 3 20% 1% 11% 2% 21% 32% 13% 1%

Reading Overall, Method 2

NE12 NEIS1 Level 2 Level 1 Level 4 Level 3

Board Results School Results

14% 2% 27% 40% 16% 1% 2% <1% 5% <1% 5% 25% 51% 12% 33% 0% 22% 0% 0% 44% 0% 0% 0% 0% 5% 0% 0% 37% 39% 20% 5% <1% 5% 26% 52% 13% 33% 0% 0% 67% 0% 0% 5% 0% 0% 37% 39% 20% Board Results School Results

Special Needs n=1 197 Special Needs n=9 All Other Students n=5 849 All Other Students n=41 Special Needs n=947 Special Needs n=6 All Other Students n=5 741 All Other Students n=41

Writing Overall, Method 1

No Data Exempt NE12 NEIS1 Level 2 Level 1 Level 4 Level 3 20% 1% 7% <1% 20% 41% 10% 1%

Writing Overall, Method 2

NE12 NEIS1 Level 2 Level 1 Level 4 Level 3

Board Results School Results

9% <1% 25% 51% 13% 1% 2% <1% 3% <1% 3% 29% 49% 13% 33% 0% 0% 0% 33% 33% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2% 0% 2% 29% 56% 10% 3% <1% 4% 30% 50% 14% 0% 0% 50% 50% 0% 0% 2% 0% 2% 29% 56% 10% Board Results School Results

Special Needs n=1 197 Special Needs n=9 All Other Students n=5 849 All Other Students n=41 Special Needs n=952 Special Needs n=6 All Other Students n=5 744 All Other Students n=41

Mathematics Overall, Method 1

No Data Exempt NE12 NEIS1 Level 2 Level 1 Level 4 Level 3 20% <1% 10% 1% 26% 28% 12% 1%

Mathematics Overall, Method 2

NE12 NEIS1 Level 2 Level 1 Level 4 Level 3

Board Results School Results

13% 1% 33% 36% 15% 2% 1% <1% 5% <1% 7% 26% 43% 17% 33% 0% 22% 0% 11% 33% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2% 24% 41% 32% 5% <1% 7% 27% 44% 17% 33% 0% 17% 50% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2% 24% 41% 32% Board Results School Results

Special Needs n=1 197 Special Needs n=9 All Other Students n=5 849 All Other Students n=41 Special Needs n=950 Special Needs n=6 All Other Students n=5 755 All Other Students n=41

References

Related documents

Although total labor earnings increase with the unskilled unions’ bargaining power, we can say nothing when the increase in production is due to stronger skilled unions, since

A full 3D physiological articulatory model was developed to simulate the mechanism of human speech production. In order to control the physiological articulatory model to

What are the driving factors leading companies to request sales tax outsourcing services:. • Complexity of returns at the local level of tax (County

Most algorithms for large item sets are related to the Apri- ori algorithm that will be discussed in Chapter IV-A2. All algorithms and methods are usually based on the same

Further investigation of the position residuals generated from using simulated data derived from an HPOP truth model showed a significant increase in accuracy from both J4 and

18 th Sunday in Ordinary Time Saint Rose of Lima Parish Parroquia Santa Rosa de Lima.. August

Pemikiran Syaikh Nawawi tentang ilmu dan ulama dalam kitab qami’ut tughyan meliputi: (a) pembahasan tentang landasan nas hadis tentang ilmu yang dapat memotivasi

After experiment 3, the supernatants (of landfill leachate) were analysed ammonia and orthophosphate concentration, and they were then added nitrogen removal