• No results found

Objectives of this session

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Objectives of this session"

Copied!
39
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Systems thinking for

health systems strengthening Taghreed Adam, MD, PhD

Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, WHO

Course in Health systems and policy Master Programme in Public Health

Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, 2 December, 2011

(2)

z

Good understanding of:

– Main characteristics of complex systems

– Health systems actors and their role/power

– What is systems thinking and what are its basic skills

– Why systems thinking is very important for health systems

z

Initiation in:

– How to think about the intended and unintended effects of health policies using a systems thinking approach

(3)

Health systems

z Key social goal…

z Improve health by

z average level of population health

z health inequities

“All organizations, people and action whose

primary intent is to promote, restore or

maintain health”

WHO, 2007
(4)
(5)

Why renewed interest in health systems?

z

Still enormous disease preventable deaths, particularly

in LMICs

z

MDGs deadline approaching but not much progress

made

z

Despite massive increase in funding, systems are not

delivering fast enough

z

Problems with scaling up essential life saving

interventions

(6)
(7)

Health systems are complex!

E.g. Architecture of drug supply sub-system in Kenya

(8)

Foundations

(9)

System building blocks and values

(10)

Underlying health systems framework

INPUTS & PROCESSES

Governance, leadership, regulatory issues Finances Human resources Infrastructure Procurement logistics & supplies Information

INPUTS & PROCESSES

Governance, leadership, regulatory issues Finances Human resources Infrastructure Procurement logistics & supplies Information OUTPUTS Strengthened system Improved servicesefficiencyaccessavailabilityaffordabilityacceptabilityqualitysafety OUTPUTS Strengthened system Improved servicesefficiencyaccessavailabilityaffordabilityacceptabilityqualitysafety OUTCOMES Increased coverageutilizationresponsiveness OUTCOMES Increased coverageutilizationresponsiveness IMPACTS Improvedsurvivalnutritionequity Reducedmorbidityimpoverishment due to health expenditures IMPACTS Improvedsurvivalnutritionequity Reducedmorbidityimpoverishment due to health expenditures

OTHER DETERMINANTS OF HEALTH

(Economic, Social, Political, Environmental)

OTHER DETERMINANTS OF HEALTH

(Economic, Social, Political, Environmental)

(11)

Health Systems: More than the building blocks

How do we work them together for a more

high performance system?

(12)

So what is

(13)

Four revolutions

z “There are four revolutions currently underway that will transform health and health systems. These are:

z Life sciences

z Information and communication technology

z Social justice and equity; and

z

Systems thinking to transcend complexity”

(14)

Systems thinking

z Systems thinking gives deeper insights into:

z how a system works,

– why it has problems,

– how it can be improved

(15)

Characteristics of all complex systems

And ….

• nest sub-systems within them • but are part of larger systems

(16)

Example

(17)

System thinking skills

Loop thinking Linear thinking

concentrating on causality and how behaviour is generated

concentrating on factors that influence or correlate

View causality as an on-going process with feedback influencing causes

view causality running in one direction

Operational thinking Factors thinking

knowledge from understanding contexts of relationships

knowledge from understanding details

Forest-thinking Tree-by-tree thinking

responsibility for behaviour from internal actors and rules

behaviour as externally driven

Systems as cause Systems as effect

focus on patterns of behaviour focus on events

Dynamic thinking Static thinking

Systems thinking approach

Usual approach

(18)

The role and power of

systems stakeholders

(19)

How stakeholder perspectives can vary

A health system is ….

(20)

Case study

z

Why there was low enrolment of the voluntary

community health insurance scheme in Tanzania?

– Supposed to cover the rural population (80% of total population)

– After 10 years, only 10% enrolled were 70% were expected to do so

z Source: Kamuzora and Gilson. Factors influencing

implementation of the Community Health Fund in Tanzania. Health Policy and Planning 2007;22:95–102

(21)

What was the policy?

z

Payment and benefits:

z Members pay fixed annual fee per household but no co-payment when using services

z Households unable to pay the fee are, in principle, entitled to an exemption.

z Households not joining the CHF pay user fees when attending health facilities.

z

Districts should:

z manage the fund (monitoring, mobilizing and administering funds, setting exemption policy and targets).

z ensure quality of care and facility supervision.

z Sub-district mobilize communities to join, award exemptions and develop community health plans for submission to district.

(22)

What happened?

z Interviews with district managers indicated a negative attitude towards exemption; arguments:

– exemptions are difficult to implement

– since the number of households qualifying for exemption was large

– exemption would erode the CHF’s financial base

– exemptions are untenable

z They all blamed the central government for not addressing the financial sustainability of the CHF

z They ignored guidelines from the central government requiring them to develop exemption criteria; arguments:

– it was the responsibility of the village

– did not have clear exemption criteria

(23)

What happened? (2)

z District managers discouraged exemption proposals coming from the communities; requests were either refused or given no

feedback.

z They considered the policy as an additional separate activity from their routine work—like a project imposed on them

z They did not ensure supervision or availability of drugs and medicines

z They did not inform people about the exemption policy or the value of joining community health funds

(24)

What have we learnt?

z Top down versus bottom up policy making—most problems with this policy stem from the way it was designed and implemented

z Resistance to new policies--As fund was seen as an imposed programme, managers gave it little support, leading to low

enrolment in the schemes.

z Role of systems actors--Apparently powerless implementers have a high margin of discretion in their personal interactions with clients, allowing them to re-interpret and reshape policies in unexpected ways.

z Ownership is important--As policy implementers are likely to react negatively to new policies formulated without their involvement, use of participatory approaches is necessary to create ownership and engage them in the implementation process

(25)
(26)

How to think of the anticipated and

unanticipated effects of health policies

(27)

All interventions have system-wide effects

(28)

Contemporary

system-level

interventions

(29)

Pay for performance—traditional approach

(30)

Pay for performance-systems thinking

(31)

Brainstorming: how did we do it?

(32)

How to think of systems-wide effects of

new policies

z

Be systematic

z

Consider all building blocks

z

Consider all important actors

z

From the perspective of each actor and each building

block brainstorm on the possible reaction of the system

or its actors to the new policy

z

Also consider the consequences of the new policy on

all building blocks

(33)
(34)

The report

z Available in hard copy in English, French and Spanish

z Available in pdf downloads at:

z http://www.who.int/alliance-hpsr/en/

(35)

What questions does the report

address?

9

What is systems thinking?

9

How can we apply it?

9

How can it help us

understand and exploit

synergies for system?

strengthening?

9

What is systems thinking?

9

How can we apply it?

9

How can it help us

understand and exploit

synergies for system?

strengthening?

(36)

Take home messages

z

Policy making needs to take into account the

complexity of systems and the important role,

incentives and power of its stakeholders;

z

Several contemporary health systems policies

(particularly in LMICs) need to be reconceptualised

using a systems thinking lens ~ simpler ways of

thinking don’t work

z

Systems thinking is a way of thinking, there are tools

that can help in this process but the most first step is

start thinking in a systems respecting way

(37)

Selected Systems Thinking tools

z

Tools for brainstorming and analyzing

policies

Causal Loop Diagram

To explore non-linear interrelationships

Systems Dynamics

To explore consequences of non-linear relationships

Social Network Analysis

To map nature of relations between actors

Concept mapping

To brainstorm and map the most important effects and

consequences of a policies

Outcome Mapping

(38)

Further reading

z de Savigny D and Adam T. Chapter 2 in: Systems thinking for Health systems strengthening. WHO, 2009.

z Shiell A, Hawe P, Gold L. Complex interventions or complex systems? Implications for health economic evaluation. BMJ. 2008 Jun 7;336(7656):1281-3.

z Leischow SJ, Best A, Trochim WM, Clark PI, Gallagher RS,

Marcus SE and Matthews E. Systems thinking to improve the public's health. Am J Prev Med. 2008 Aug;35(2 Suppl):S196-203.

z Paina L and Peters DH. Understanding pathways for scaling uphealth services through the lens of complex adaptive

systems. Health Policy and Planning 2011;1–9

z Sterman JD. Learning from Evidence in a Complex World. American Journal of Public Health | March 2006, Vol 96, No. 3.

(39)

Systems thinking video:

References

Related documents

Procurando comprender el porqué de la elección de la carrera docente —el «querer ser» docente— encontramos una vía de abordaje entre los estudios sobre la cuestión de

Public health personnel are available to help assess the risk of a source person which may include contacting the source to collect information about health status and

Despite the allure of social media platforms and the mantra of content marketing being the only thing working these days, the truth is that none of these methods can hold a candle to

This marketing audit evaluates the current business strategies practised in the Dutch Lady marketing process and its business environment in Malaysia with specific

This review presents 92 studies that provide empirical evidence of the impact of outreach interventions on a broad range of outcomes, including aspirations towards, awareness of, and

In the present study, 16.2% (16/138) of Gram-negative uropathogens showed the occurrence of carbapenemase encoding genes, which is almost four times higher than other data reported

By pull- ing back the veil on a formerly hidden world, exploitation films like Maniac not only give the viewer a picture of the woman Hollywood denies, but a purportedly “real” look

Since the study is comparative and we know Sweden is in the forefront, when looking at gender equality compared with Estonia (Hausman et al. 2014), it is interesting to compare