• No results found

Fostering Further Collaboration between PMDA and Applicants with Efficient Project Management in Drug Development

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Fostering Further Collaboration between PMDA and Applicants with Efficient Project Management in Drug Development"

Copied!
20
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Kazuishi Sekino

Review Director

Office of New Drug I

Pharmaceuticals & Medical Devices Agency

Fostering Further Collaboration

between PMDA and Applicants with

Efficient “Project Management” in

Drug Development

(2)

Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed in the following

PowerPoint slides are those of the individual presenter and

should not be attributed to DIA, its directors, officers,

employees, volunteers, members, chapters, councils,

Communities or affiliates, or any organization with which

the presenter is employed or affiliated.

These PowerPoint slides are the intellectual property of the

individual presenter and are protected under the copyright

laws of the United States of America and other countries.

Used by permission. All rights reserved. DIA and the DIA

logo are registered trademarks or trademarks of Drug

Information Association Inc. All other trademarks are the

property of their respective owners.

(3)

2. The Elements of Project and Priority

3. Progress Management of Approval Review Process

4. Progress Management of Scientific Advice process

Outline of Presentation

(4)

Review Time for New Drugs (median)

The PMDA’s Second Mid-term Plan

<https://www.pmda.go.jp/files/000206389.pdf>

(Total review time = Regulatory review time + Applicant’s time)

(Numbers of

approved products)

(Months)

FY2014

The PMDA’s Third

Mid-term Plan

(5)

EU

US

Japan

Canada

Switzerland

Australia

Regulatory Affairs Professional Society

2015/1/14

Six regulatory Authorities’ Approval Time of New Drugs in

2004-2013

(6)

FY2014

FY2015

FY2016

FY2017

FY2018

Target

percentile

60%

60%

70%

70%

80%

The PMDA’s Third Mid-term Plan

FY2014 to FY2018

The plan for prompt realization of “zero” review lag for new drugs

Review Time for New Drugs (

Priority Review

)

Total review time

(Regulatory review time + Applicant’s time)

9 months

6 months + 3 months

Review Time for New Drugs (

Standard Review

)

Total review time

(Regulatory review time + Applicant’s time)

12 months

9 months + 3 months

<http://www.pmda.go.jp/guide/jyohokokai/kohyo/file/1-7keikaku3.pdf>

(7)

Outline of Presentation

2. The Elements of Project and Priority

3. Project Management for Process of Approval Review

4. Project Management for Process of Scientific Advice

1. Current Situation of Approval Review

(8)

The Three Elements of Project and Priority

Project

「プロジェクトマネジメント 理論編(第

2

版)」総合法令出版 一部改変

Time

(start and end

time, the

necessary time)

Scope,

Quality

(different each

time)

Resource

(reviewers)

Time

Resource

Quality

Scope,

Top Priority

(Mandatory Goal)

Second Priority

(Goal to Strive)

(9)

Outline of Presentation

2. The Elements of Project and Priority

3. Project Management for Process of Approval Review

4. Project Management for Process of Scientific Advice

1. Current Situation of Approval Review

(10)

Flow of Review for New Drugs (in the past)

PMDA’s

Evaluation

PMDA’s

Opinion

PAFSC

Approval

by MHLW

NDA

Filling

Pre-Submission

Meeting

PMDA

MHLW

List of

Questions

to Applicant

PMDA’s

Evaluation

External

Expert

Discussion

Submission

Initial

Meeting

Assessment

Report

Standard

Review

1.9-2.5

months months0.2-0.7 4.7-8.3 months 1.2-1.9 months 0.7-1.9 months

Standard Review: Total 12 months

Priority Review: Total 9 months

<Administrative Notice of MHLW, March 30, 2012>

MHLW:Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare

NDA:New Drug Application

PMDA:Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency

(11)
(12)

Flow of Review for New Drugs (at present)

PMDA’s

Evaluation

Opinion

PMDA’s

PAFSC

Approval

by MHLW

NDA

Filling

Pre-Submission

Meeting

PMDA

MHLW

List of

Questions

to Applicant

PMDA’s

Evaluation

External

Expert

Discussion

Submission

Initial

Meeting

Assessment

Report

Standard

Review

Priority

Review

2.4 months months0.6 1.9 months months0.3

5.7 months 1.5 months 0.9 months

4.4 months 1.3 months 0.8 months

Standard Review: 12 months

Priority Review: 9 months

<Administrative Notice of MHLW, January 30, 2015>

MHLW:Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare

NDA:New Drug Application

PMDA:Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency

(13)

Outline of Presentation

2. The Elements of Project and Priority

3. Project Management for Process of Approval Review

4. Project Management for Process of Scientific Advice

(14)

Flow of Scientific Advice for New Drug Development

PMDA’s

Evaluation

Minutes

Scheduling

Pre-Submission

Meeting

List of

Questions

to Applicant

PMDA’s

Evaluation

Intention

to Apply

1 week (2-5 weeks) 1 week

2 months (8-11 weeks)

Preparing

Document

Submission of

Document

List of Questions

Response to

PMDA’s

Opinion

to Applicant

Face to

Face

Meeting

Response to

PMDA’s Opinion

1 week 1 month (1 week) (1 week)

5 weeks

Applicant’s

Action

(15)

Number of Scientific Advice for New Drugs

(Review Category 1; Gastrointestinal Drugs etc.)

<https://www.pmda.go.jp/0017.html>

(16)

Example of the GANNT chart (I)

Global Phase III trial

Japa

n

US

& EU

Phase II trial

Phase I

trial

Phase II trial

Phase I

trial

2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q

Scientific Advice

Applicant’s

Decision Making

FDA, EMA

PMDA

Top-Line Results

Delay of

enrollment of

Japanese patients?

Reflection of

PMDA’s opinion

to protocol?

PMDA

FDA, EMA

Best

timing?

Hypothetical situation

EMA:European Medicines Agency

FDA:US Food and Drug Administrationl

(17)

Example of the GANNT chart (II)

Global Phase III trial

Japa

n

US

& EU

Phase I

trial

Phase IIa trial

Phase I

trial

2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q

FDA, EMA

PMDA

Global Phase II

trial

Reflection of

PMDA’s opinion

to protocol?

Best

timing?

FDA, EMA, PMDA

Best road

map?

Hypothetical situation

Scientific Advice

Applicant’s

Decision Making

Top-Line Results

EMA:European Medicines Agency

FDA:US Food and Drug Administrationl

(18)

Items for the Project Management

Examples of items for the project

management

The target product profile

The strategic development plan (and current

status)

The GANNT chart (development history and

project scheduling, including discussion to

regulatory agencies)

etc.

Project

Time

(starting and

ending time, the

required time)

Scope,

Quality

(different each

time)

Resource

(reviewers)

Effective utilization of pre-submission meeting

(sharing the information between applicant

and PMDA)

PMDA:Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency 「プロジェクトマネジメント 理論編(第2版)」総合法令出版 一部改変

(19)

Welfare of patients!

Thank you for your attention.

(20)

References

Related documents

policies, conscious and deliberate, carried out by governments of different types, although with a common objective: to change the Spanish productive and economic system and

LINK • • Help people addre Help people address basic needs and ss basic needs and access

• Individuals or start-up companies that have been approved financial support from Enterprise Ireland (including Feasibility Grants, New Frontiers Stipend, CORD

Analysis of the major texts and tutorial papers on software design patterns has produced a set of eight major assertions, listed in Table 2, that are commonly made by the

– Clinical data including those of Japanese subjects, which was amassed according to the CDISC standards, and are under regulatory review or going to be filed to PMDA (more than 1

It is acknowledged that due to sampling, the integral rainfall parameters of the gamma distribution are biased and the di ff erences between the analytical value and sampled