• No results found

Usage-based Insurance for Commercial Lines

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Usage-based Insurance for Commercial Lines"

Copied!
17
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Usage-based Insurance for Commercial Lines

What can we learn from personal lines?

Mohamad Hindawi, PhD, FCAS

March 31, 2014
(2)

Significant value available from the right UBI program

1

2

3

Improves risk

measurement and

pricing

Provides

knowledge to

empower new risk

Informs claims

Provides

information that

may correlate

with other

non-auto risks

UBI

Non-Auto

Lines

Pricing

Claim

Risk Control

Product

Supports the

“right” products

and services

(3)

1997

Proliferation of UBI in personal insurance

2004 – 2006

GMAC Low-mileage discount

Progressive Tripsense

2007 – 2009

National General OnStar

PAYG

Progressive MyRate

American Family Teen Safe

Safeco Teensurance  Travelers Intellidrive  MileMeter MileMeter 2.0

2010

Allstate DriveWise  CSAA uDrive  Safeco Rewind

State Farm OnStar

2011

Auto Club OnBoard

Progressive Snapshot

State Farm Drive Safe

and Save

Nationwide SmartRide

The Hartford TrueLane

2012

Esurance DriveSense

State Farm Forc Sync

 CSE SAVE

Farmers/Elephant DriveIQ

21st Century DriveIQ

AA Drivesafe

DTRIC Akamai Rater

MetroMile MetroMile  Mapfre DriveAdvisor

2013 – 2014

MetLife My Journey  Esurance DriveSafe  American Family MySafetyValet
(4)

Limited UBI products in commercial insurance

2010

Travelers

2013

Cincinnati Financials

2011

The Hartford Fleet Ahead

Zurich Fleet Intelligence

2009

Liberty Mutual OnBoard

(5)

The commercial auto market

Sales fleets

Public entities

Micro-fleets

Owner Operators

Commercial fleets

Trucking fleets

Pricing

Risk control/Efficiency

Convenience

Rental

fleets

Customer

(6)

Current ecosystem

Insurers

TSPs

Devices

Fleet

Management

Analytics

Others

Customers

Personal /

commercial

Telematics

service providers

Device and

gateway providers

Fleet management

companies

Analytics providers

Data aggregators

Smartphone apps

Logistics

(7)

Current ecosystem: National Accounts

Insurers

TSPs

Devices

Fleet

Management

Analytics

Others

National

Accounts

Personal /

commercial

Telematics

service providers

Device and

gateway providers

Fleet management

companies

Analytics providers

Data aggregators

Smartphone apps

Logistics

(8)

Current ecosystem: Middle Market

Insurers

TSPs

Devices

Fleet

Management

Analytics

Others

Middle Market

Personal /

commercial

Telematics

service providers

Device and

gateway providers

Fleet management

companies

Analytics providers

Data aggregators

Smartphone apps

Logistics

(9)

Current ecosystem: Small Accounts

Insurers

TSPs

Devices

Fleet

Management

Analytics

Others

Small Accounts

Personal /

commercial

Telematics

service providers

Device and

gateway providers

Fleet management

companies

Analytics providers

Data aggregators

Smartphone apps

Logistics

(10)

Contrasting personal and commercial auto

Personal

Auto

Commercial

Auto

Core business

X

Inexpensive telematics products

X

Controls technology deployment

X

Self selection works

X

(11)

Current models in commercial lines

Inputs

 One or more TSPs offered through risk control  Customer pays directly to TSP

 Certain data shared with the insurer and used by underwriting and/or

risk control

How does it work?

 There are 300+ TSPS - no provider has meaningful market share  Large number of telematics devices are already installed in larger

fleets by a wide variety of telematics service providers

 Competes with Fleet Management companies (in their territory)

Challenges?

 Cincinnati Financials  The Hartford

 Zurich

Who uses it?

Panel

of

(12)

Current models in commercial lines

Inputs

 Build comprehensive product with multiple components including:

o Insurance

o Fleet management o Driver management

How does it work?

 Complexity

 Not part of insurer’s core business  Adoption rate

Challenges?

 Liberty Mutual

Who uses it?

Com

prehensi

ve

Prod

(13)

Current models in commercial lines

Inputs

 Contract with multiple TSPs to receive data on existing customers  Normalize data received for multiple sources to use in underwriting

and/or risk control

How does it work?

 Need to integrate with multiple TSPs

 Data/analytics from existing systems is not comparable between

different TSPs or even between products from the same TSP

 Not practical except for the largest companies

Challenges?

 None (at least publicly)

Who uses it?

Leve

ra

ging

Exis

ting

Data

(14)

Primary model used in personal lines

Inputs

 Primarily focused on measurement of risk with subsequent pricing

adjustments

 Insurers fully fund programs to collect data  Use self-selection to fund early UBI programs  Control consumer’s first experience with telematics

How does it work?

 Managing operation efficiently

 Integrating with existing product strategy

Challenges?

 Everyone

Who uses it?

Self

Sele

ct

ion

Mod

el

(15)

Insurers can

leverage similar

solution for

personal and

small commercial

lines

Discounts have

larger impact on

small insured than

medium and

larger insureds

Applicable to small

commercial

accounts:

More than 65% of

the total industry

premium

Why should CL consider the PL model?

Small

Accounts

1

2

(16)

Test, learn, and

adapt

Don’t overspend

on initial

infrastructure

Don’t wait for the

Clearly define

your business

model

Simplify your

offering

Final thoughts

1

2

3

4

5

Success

(17)

Contact details

Mohamad Hindawi, PhD, FCAS

Towers Watson

(860) 264-7257

References

Related documents

CENTRAL: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials; CINAHL: Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature; CRD: National Institute for Health Research and Centre

The Morris Business Professionals of America Facebook page is only one of many forms of social networking the chapter uses to notify the students, but it is the most effective way

The method is obtained by extending a modified version of the short-time objective intelligibility (STOI) measure with a modified equalization-cancellation (EC) stage. We evaluate

In the following, we describe the construction of a semantic similarity dataset (imagesim-353 ) and the combination of a pre-trained deep learning neural net- work used together

The boscalid-based product inhibited conidium and aflatoxin production in maize seeds by all three toxigenic strains, but did not affect in vitro mycelium growth. The succinate

Purpose: To validate and compare the deformable image registration and parotid contour propagation process for head and neck magnetic resonance imaging in patients treated

Supports adults with diverse needs including learning disabilities, autistic spectrum conditions, acquired brain injury, physical disabilities, sensory impairments, mental health

From the middle to upper stratosphere, reanalysis ozone profiles are within ±20 % of observations from the SPARC Data Initiative, although the comparisons are not truly inde-