• No results found

Example 001. Sample Organization Chart. President. Engineering Mgr: Eng. Tech

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Example 001. Sample Organization Chart. President. Engineering Mgr: Eng. Tech"

Copied!
12
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Example 001

<Company Name>

Sample Organization Chart

Note: Include management duties and authority details

President Responsibilities: Business Financials, Hiring, Scheduling Must authorize and sign: Quotes, Purchase Order Reviews,

Management Responsibilities: Quality System Compliance, Audits, Production Stop Authorization, Representative: Must authorize and sign: Release of document changes, final product shipments, etc. Engineering Mgr: Responsibilities: Review Engineering Requirements

Must authorize and sign: Changes to specifications, drawings, etc. Purchasing Mgr: Responsibilities:

Must authorize and sign: Information Tech: Responsibilities:

Must authorize and sign

Date:

Authorized Signature

Controlled Doc 001, Rev: _____ Release Date: ________ Page 1 of 1

President

Management Representative

IT

Engineering

Eng. Tech

Purchasing

Receiving

(2)

Purchase Order Review Form (Project Planning)

Note: Revisions or Changes to Purchase Order , Drawings, etc., require additional Review Forms to

be filled out.

Purchase Order #: Quote #: APP Part #

PO Rev Level #: Supplier Part #:

PO Receipt Date: Delivery Date: Commit Date:

Drawing #: Revision

Level:

Supplier Flowdown Reviewed?

Specification #: Rev: On File? Y N Reviewed by:

Specification Exception: Approved by:

Specification #: Rev: On File? Y N Reviewed by:

Specification Exception: Approved by:

Specification #: Rev: Reviewed by:

Specification Exception: Approved by:

Material Requirements -Alloy

-Heat Treat Required -Hardness

-Surface Treatment Required Outsourcing

Requirements

Subcontractor Name: Operation Performed: Lead Time to Delivery Design Review Date:

Expected Ship Date: Actual Ship Date:

(List where the requirements are defined in the PO Package.) Inspection Requirements Dimensional, per:

Visual, per: Material, per Packing Method Required:

Project Overview:

(3)
(4)

Controlled Documents Master List

Document name:

Release Date:

Current Revision:

001 - Organization Chart

002 - Purchase Order Review form

003 - Controlled Documents Master List

004 - Project File Checklist

005 - Calibration Log

006 - Corrective Action Request

007 - Corrective Action Log

008 - Nonconforming Material Tag

009 - Final Acceptance Form

010

Alcoa Howmet-Owned Inventory List

(5)

Example 004

<Company Name>

Project File Checklist

Note: Project File must contain the following (at a minimum)

Check if

included

Quote

Purchase Order

PO Review Form

Design Review & Approval

Approval by both APP & Supplier (can be by e-mail,

etc.)

Drawings, and all changes and revisions

Rework, if applicable

Rejection Notice/Rework Request, etc.)

Final Acceptance

File Notes:

(6)

Final Acceptance Form

Purchase Order #:

Revision:

I hereby acknowledge that the following design is in compliance with all of the

requirements per this revision, purchase order, references file and/or

referenced documents.

Date:

Authorized Signature – Supplier

Job

Number:

Comments:

Date:

Authorized Signature –Alcoa Howmet

Comments:

(7)

Example 006

<Company Name>

Alcoa Power and Propulsion - Owned Inventory List

Equipment ID:

Tooling/Gage/Equipment Description:

Date

Received

Status

Date

Returned

(8)

Calibration Log

Gage ID: Description: Current Location / Owner: Cal Date: Due Date: Status:

'Sample' C-001 6" Dial Caliper (Starrett) Tool Box / Joe A. 08/31/09 02/31/10 Active 'Sample' C-002 8" Vernier Caliper (Mitutoyo) Storage Shelf / Company 08/31/09 No Cal Out for Repair 'Sample' M-001 0-1" Micrometer (B & S) Tool Box / Company 08/31/09 02/31/10 Active

(9)

Example 008

<Company Name>

Nonconforming Product Tag

Note: Suspect APP product must be tagged immediately.

REVIEW REQUIRED

PART #:

Description of Nonconformity:

Review by:

Date:

(10)

Corrective Action Request

Assigned Corrective Action Number:

Date Issued:

Issued

By:

Response Due:

(30 days from issue date)

Supplier/Name:

Purchase Order #:

Address:

Purchase Order Line Item #

City/State/Zip:

Problem/Nature of Discrepancy:

Containment (Immediate Action

Taken):

Date Implemented:

(What action was immediately performed to contain the problem in the short term until the root cause and corrective

actions are put in place?)

Root Cause (see below):

Date of Root Cause

Analysis:

Root Cause Analysis

What is the basic cause of the nonconformance?

Root causes usually result from: Design; Planning; Procedures/Work Instructions; Supervision; Training; Tools and

Equipment; Work Environment.

Corrective Action

Taken:

Target/Implementation Date:

What permanent action(s) will be put into place to correct the root cause?

Preventive Action Taken:

Target Date:

What actions have been taken to prevent this nonconformance from recurring? Have you reviewed other product or

process that may have similar or like nonconformances?

Planned Verification

Activities:

Target Date:

Conduct a timely follow-up review to ensure that the actions taken, and the controls that have been put in place, are

effectively working.

(11)
(12)

Corrective Action Tracking Log

Corrective

Action No.

Issued To

Company

Date

Issued

Date

Due

Date

Closed

Description of Nonconformance

References

Related documents

David (1999) was amazed at the change in roles she experienced when she switched from her role as a reading specialist to that of a literacy coach. For the past 15 years, I have

This paper examines the application of Visual Basic Computer Programming Language to Simulate Numerical Iterations, the merit of Visual Basic as a Programming Language and

A regression analysis was conducted with membership self-esteem as the dependent variable and private collective self-esteem as the independent variable a p value of .003

Furthermore, while symbolic execution systems often avoid reasoning precisely about symbolic memory accesses (e.g., access- ing a symbolic offset in an array), C OMMUTER ’s test

The purpose of the Community Support and Assistance (CSA) Budget Control Level (formerly Transitional Living and Support) is to provide resources and services to Seattle's

All stationary perfect equilibria of the intertemporal game approach (as slight stochastic perturbations as in Nash (1953) tend to zero) the same division of surplus as the static

Roosevelt Down in Maine. Nothing daunted, Roosevelt got a ladder and climbed into the house, presently emerging with the fowl squalling and stuggling in his

•Modify AM Plans, 10 year Opex and Capex plans, lifecycle model of asset class •Develop Corporate and Customer LOS &amp; Risk Management. Framework with preferred