John Kooti, Dean and the School of Business faculty Georgia Southwestern State University 1/1/2008
Georgia Southwestern State University
School of Business Administration
Deferral Report
to
AACSB International
Initial Accreditation
Deferral Report
School of Business Administration
800 GSW State University Drive
Americus, GA 31709
December 9, 2008
Georgia Southwestern State University
School of Business Administration
Executive Summary
Georgia Southwestern State University is a senior unit of the University System of Georgia. The University was founded in 1906 as the Third District Agricultural and Mechanical School. In 1964, the College became a senior unit of the University System, conferring its first baccalaureate degrees in June of 1968. In July 1996, the Board of Regents authorized state university status, and the institution became Georgia
Southwestern State University.
Georgia Southwestern State University is accredited by the Commission on Colleges of the Southern
Association of Colleges and Schools to award the following degrees: Bachelor of Arts, Bachelor of Business Administration, Bachelor of Fine Arts, Bachelor of Science, Bachelor of Science in Education, Bachelor of Science in Nursing, Master of Business Administration, Master of Education, and Master of Science. The School of Business Administration is one of five academic units at Georgia Southwestern State University reporting to the Vice President for Academic Affairs. As a unit of the University System of Georgia (USG), Georgia Southwestern State University receives annual funding for USG through
appropriation by the State of Georgia. Funds are then allocated to the School of Business Administration through the University’s budget process. The Dean of the School of Business Administration is responsible for all administrative activities of the School.
The continuing budget provides support for the faculty and staff salaries, supplies, equipment, travel,
communications, and other operational and developmental needs of the academic and related programs of the School. The University commits funds to support faculty intellectual contribution activities. The University also provides funds for students’ activities including the Students in Free Enterprise (SIFE), and Study Abroad programs. The School of Business budget doubled from fiscal year 2003 to 2008 and the number of faculty increased from 11 to 19.
In spite of the budget situation, the School of Business Administration faculty continue to present papers at academic conferences, attend AACSB Assessment Seminars and Conferences, and participate in other academic and professional development.
The university’s current enrollment is 2,700 students, of which the School of Business enrollment is 600 including 46 students in the MBA program.
The mission of the School of Business Administration is to provide its diverse student population quality undergraduate and graduate-level educational programs that produce graduates with the knowledge and skills to help them excel in their business careers, further academic studies, and fulfill their personal potential. The School strives to enhance students’ academic experience through relevant faculty teaching activities, community service, applied scholarly endeavors relevant to the southwest Georgia region, and professional activities. This commitment includes abiding by the following standards:
Honesty and integrity in interactions and undertakings Respect for the rights, differences, and dignity of others Accountability for personal behavior
Since the last fiscal year, the School of Business has made significant strides in the areas identified by the visiting committee, including:
• Faculty publications and conferences – 14 Faculty participated in academic presentations and peer-reviewed publications within the last year. The professionally qualified faculty who hold senior-level positions have been continuously active in their profession and have maintained their qualifications. • Assessment – We have documented and refined our assurance of learning to have a systematic
process for planning, implementation, evaluation and recommendation for improvement (closing the loop).
INTRODUCTION
The faculty, staff, and administration of the School of Business Administration at Georgia Southwestern State University are pleased to provide its AACSB International Initial Accreditation Deferral Report. The report describes successful resolution of the issues detailed in the team visit report, these were:
1. Academically Qualified/Professionally Qualified as well as Participating/Supporting faculty standards for undergraduate and graduate faculty needs to be more clearly defined and systematically implemented. (Standards 9 &10)
2. Expectations for graduate faculty classification should be definitive. (Standards 9 & 10)
3. Instruments and processes for Assurance of Learning should be coordinated and reviewed by the Assessment Committee. (Standards 16 & 18)
4. Although faculty discussions indicated that direct measures of Assurance of Learning were present, process should be established to report and collect those data. (Standards 16 & 18)
5. Measures of graduate program objectives are not currently at a mature stage. Direct and indirect assessments should be clarified and implemented during the next year. (Standard 18)
RESPONSE TO CONCERNS
1. Academically Qualified/Professionally Qualified as well as Participating/Supporting
faculty standards for undergraduate and graduate faculty needs to be more clearly
defined and systematically implemented. (Standards 9 & 10)
Response:
The School of Business Administration faculty reviewed and approved a clear definition of Academically Qualified and Professionally Qualified faculty in April 2008. The guideline clearly defines requirements for academically and professionally qualified faculty.
Exhibit I shows the definitions of Academic and Professional qualification for all participating and supporting faculty teaching in the School of Business Administration.
Tables 9-1, 10-1, and 10-2 summarize how Standards 9 and 10 are met.
Supporting documentation for these standards are found in the AQ/PQ Guideline and Faculty Vitae (Exhibit II).
EXHIBIT I
SCHOOL OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
Academically Qualified and Professionally Qualified Faculty
I.
Academically Qualified Faculty
A faculty member teaching in the School of Business Administration will be considered academically qualified (AQ) provided s/he meets the following conditions:
1) Must have an earned doctorate degree in their teaching field or related field. 2) Must have published a minimum of:
3 refereed articles (at least two must be a journal article, the other may be a refereed conference proceeding article) in the most recent 5-year period.
Exceptions:
(i) Faculty with a master’s degree in taxation or a combination of graduate degrees in law and accounting will be considered as having a terminal degree to teach taxation.
(ii) Faculty members who are ABD will be considered AQ if they are completing their first year of service in the School of Business Administration.
(iii) Faculty members who have received a terminal degree in the discipline in which they teach within the last 5 years will be considered AQ.
II.
Professionally Qualified Faculty
A faculty member in the School of Business Administration will be considered professionally qualified (PQ) provided s/he meets the following conditions:
1) Must have an earned master’s degree or doctorate degree in their teaching field.
2) Must have and maintain relevant business experience in their field of teaching as demonstrated by the following:
a) Is currently holding a senior level full-time, part-time or consulting position with responsibilities related to the field in which s/he is teaching, or
b) Has held a full-time senior level position with responsibilities related to the field in which s/he is teaching within the last 5 years, or
2. Expectations for graduate faculty classification should be definitive. (Standards 9 & 10)
Response:
The Scholarship Committee has reviewed and increased expectations for all academically qualified faculty. Exhibit I shows the new guidelines for academically and professionally qualified graduate faculty. The guideline is definitive, with a higher level of expectation than before, and systematically implemented.
Standard 9. The school maintains a faculty to provide stability and ongoing quality improvement for the
instructional programs offered. The deployment of faculty resources reflects the mission and programs. Students in all programs, majors, areas of emphasis, and location have the opportunity to receive instruction from appropriately qualified faculty.
Table 9-1 shows that Georgia Southwestern State University’s participating faculty size is adequate in relation to AACSB accreditation standards and the mission of the School of Business Administration. The table below shows the adequacy of participating faculty in the School of Business Administration.
Table 9-1 Georgia Southwestern State University
SUMMARY OF FACULTY SUFFICIENCY IN DISCIPLINE AND SCHOOL (USING STUDENT CREDIT HOURS)
2007-2008 Academic Year
Name Participating
or Supportive (P or S)
Amount of teaching if P Amount of teaching if S
Ratio
Accounting Fall Spring Total Fall Spring Total
Bishop, Carol P 207 366 573 Dorestani, Alireza P 111 210 321 - Howell, Curtis P 183 69 252 - Jourdan, Jessica P 458 360 828 TOTAL ACCOUNTING 969 1,005 1,974 - - - 100.00 % Name Participating or Supportive (P or S)
Amount of teaching if P Amount of teaching if S
Ratio
Economics Fall Spring Total Fall Spring Total
Szmedra, Philip P 324 312 636 - Kooti, John P 66 72 138 - TOTAL ECONOMICS 390 384 774 100.00 % Name Participating or Supportive (P or S)
Amount of teaching if P Amount of teaching if S
Ratio
Finance Fall Spring Total Fall Spring Total
Valentine, Randall P 358 303 661 -
Name Participating or Supportive
(P or S)
Amount of teaching if P Amount of teaching if S
Ratio
Management Fall Spring Total Fall Spring Total
Cheokas, Gaynor P 150 126 276 - - - Fathi, Michael P 441 387 828 - Grimes, Mark S - 138 126 264 Heshizer, Brian P 471 261 732 Jourdan, Zack P 255 408 663 Ledman, Robert P 294 225 519 Murie, Shaun P - 24 24 NeSmith, Bill S - 171 138 309 Perry, Shannon P 285 426 711 - Stone, Eric S - 117 168 285 Wilson, Liz P 225 144 369 TOTAL MANAGEMENT 2,121 2,001 4,122 426 432 858 82.77% Name Participating or Supportive (P or S)
Amount of teaching if P Amount of teaching if S
Ratio
Marketing Fall Spring Total Fall Spring Total
Maldonado, Cecilia P 375 363 738 Stovall, John P 156 447 603 Valentine, Dawn P 468 405 873 TOTAL MARKETING 999 1,215 2,214 - - - 100.00 % OVERALL TOTAL 4,837 4,908 9,745 426 432 858 91.91 %
Standard 10. The faculty has, and maintains, intellectual qualifications and current expertise to accomplish
the mission, and to assure that this occurs, the school has a clearly defined process to evaluate individual faculty member’s contributions to the school’s mission.
Tables 10-1 and 10-2 illustrate that Georgia Southwestern State University’s School of Business faculty meet the minimum standard for academically qualified and professionally qualified by discipline.
TABLE 10-1: SUMMARY OF FACULTY QUALIFICATION, INTELLECTUAL CONTRIBUTIONS AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES
(RE: Standards 2 & 10) 2007 – 2008 Academic Year
Number of Contributions during the last five years Learning & Pedagogical Scholarship5 Discipline- Based Scholarship5 Contributions to Practice5 Name Highest Earned Degree & Year Date of First Appoint ment to School Percent of Time Dedicated to the School’s Mission A ca d em ic a lly Q u a lif ie d P rof es si on al ly Q u a lif ie d O the r
PRJ OIC PRJ OIC PRJ OIC Normal Professional Responsibilities6
Accounting
Bishop, Carol MACC 1982
2007 100 PQ UG
CPA License # 7279 Assessment Committee Co-chair Dorestani, Alireza PhD/ABD
2002 2007 100 AQ 2 1 2 2 4 3 UG/GR Howell, Curtis PhD 1996 2001 100 AQ 3 4 UG/GR CPA License #32967 Jourdan, Jessica MTAX
2003
TABLE 10-1: SUMMARY OF FACULTY QUALIFICATION, INTELLECTUAL CONTRIBUTIONS AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES
(RE: Standards 2 & 10) 2007 – 2008 Academic Year
Number of Contributions during the last five years Learning & Pedagogical Scholarship5 Discipline- Based Scholarship5 Contributions to Practice5 Name Highest Earned Degree & Year Date of First Appoint ment to School Percent of Time Dedicated to the School’s Mission A ca d em ic a lly Q u a lif ie d P rof es si on al ly Q u a lif ie d O the r
PRJ OIC PRJ OIC PRJ OIC Normal Professional Responsibilities6 Economics Kooti, John PhD 1980 1998 100 AQ 2 1 6 8 UG/GR ADM Szmedra, Philip PhD 1986 2001 100 AQ 1 3 14 UG/GR
TABLE 10-1: SUMMARY OF FACULTY QUALIFICATION, INTELLECTUAL CONTRIBUTIONS AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES
(RE: Standards 2 & 10) 2007 – 2008 Academic Year
Number of Contributions during the last five years Learning & Pedagogical Scholarship5 Discipline- Based Scholarship5 Contributions to Practice5 Name Highest Earned Degree & Year Date of First Appoint ment to School Percent of Time Dedicated to the School’s Mission A ca d em ic a lly Q u a lif ie d P rof es si on al ly Q u a lif ie d O the r
PRJ OIC PRJ OIC PRJ OIC Normal Professional Responsibilities6 Finance Valentine, Randall PhD 2006 2005 100 AQ 3 3 4 4 12 14 UG/GR
TABLE 10-1: SUMMARY OF FACULTY QUALIFICATION, INTELLECTUAL CONTRIBUTIONS AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES
(RE: Standards 2 & 10) 2007 – 2008 Academic Year
Number of Contributions during the last five years Learning & Pedagogical Scholarship5 Discipline- Based Scholarship5 Contributions to Practice5 Name Highest Earned Degree & Year Date of First Appoint ment to School Percent of Time Dedicated to the School’s Mission A ca d em ic a lly Q u a lif ie d P rof es si on al ly Q u a lif ie d O the r 4
PRJ OIC PRJ OIC PRJ OIC Normal Professional Responsibilities6
Management/HR Management
Cheokas, Gaynor MSA 1994
2006 100 PQ UG
Director of Center for Business and
Economic Development Fathi, Michael DBA
1985
1999 100 AQ 1 1 15 UG
ADM Grimes, Mark DBA
2004
1999 30 PQ Vice President, Sumter
Regional Hospital Heshizer, Brian PhD 1978 2002 100 AQ 2 3 2 2 1 UG/GR Jourdan, Zack PhD 2008 2006 100 AQ 2 4 UG Ledman, Robert PhD 1994 2005 100 AQ 6 1 1 UG/GR
Murie, Shaun MBA 2004 2007 20 PQ 1 UG Director NeSmith, Bill JD 1997 2003 40 PQ UG Law Partner Perry, Shannon MBA
1993
2006 50 PQ UG
CEO Stone, Eric JD/MBA
2005/2002 2003 20 PQ UG Plant Manager Wilson, Liz PhD 1985 1990 70 PQ 1 6 UG ADM
TABLE 10-1: SUMMARY OF FACULTY QUALIFICATION, INTELLECTUAL CONTRIBUTIONS AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES
(RE: Standards 2 & 10) 2007 – 2008 Academic Year
Number of Contributions during the last five years Learning & Pedagogical Scholarship5 Discipline- Based Scholarship5 Contributions to Practice5 Name Highest Earned Degree & Year Date of First Appoint ment to School Percent of Time Dedicated to the School’s Mission A ca d em ic a lly Q u a lif ie d P rof es si on al ly Q u a lif ie d O the r
PRJ OIC PRJ OIC PRJ OIC Normal Professional Responsibilities6 Marketing Maldonado, Cecilia PhD 2007 2007 100 AQ 4 9 UG/GR Stovall, John PhD 2004 2005 100 AQ 1 4 UG Valentine, Dawn PhD 1998 2005 100 AQ 17 9 UG/GR
Table 10-2: Calculations Relative to Deployment of Qualified Faculty (RE: Standard 10) Name Qualification (Academic-AQ, Professional-PQ, Other-O) (From Table 10.1) AQ Faculty- % of Time Devoted to Mission (From Table 10.1) PQ Faculty- % of Time Devoted to Mission (From Table 10.1) Other2 Faculty - % of Time Devoted to Mission (From Table 10.1) Qualification Ratios Per STD 10 Accounting Bishop, Carol PQ 100 Dorestani, Alireza AQ 100 Howell, Curtis AQ 100 Jourdan, Jessica PQ 100 TOTAL ACCOUNTING 200 200 0 Meets requirement for (AQ=50 %) 50.00 % 50.00 % 0.00 % Meets requirement for (AQ+PQ=100%) AQ Ratio: AQ/(AQ+PQ+O) 50.00 %
AQ and PQ Ratio: (AQ+PQ)/(AQ+PQ+O) 100.00 %
Name Qualification (Academic-AQ, Professional-PQ, Other-O) (From Table 10.1) AQ Faculty- % of Time Devoted to Mission (From Table 10.1) PQ Faculty- % of Time Devoted to Mission (From Table 10.1) Other2 Faculty - % of Time Devoted to Mission (From Table 10.1) Qualification Ratios Per STD 10 Economics
Szmedra, Philip AQ 100 0 0 Meets
requirement for AQ (AQ=100 %) Kooti, John AQ 100 0 0 TOTAL ECONOMICS 200 0 0 AQ/(AQ+PQ+O) 100 % 100 % Meets requirement for (AQ+PQ=100 %) (AQ+PQ)/(AQ+PQ+O) 100 % 0 % 0 % 100 % Name Qualification (Academic-AQ, Professional-PQ, Other-O) (From Table 10.1) AQ Faculty- % of Time Devoted to Mission (From Table 10.1) PQ Faculty- % of Time Devoted to Mission (From Table 10.1) Other2 Faculty - % of Time Devoted to Mission (From Table 10.1) Qualification Ratios Per STD 10 Finance Valentine, Randall AQ 100 0 0 Meets requirement for AQ (AQ=100 %) AQ/(AQ+PQ+O) 100 % 0 % 0 % 100 % Meets requirement for (AQ+PQ=100 %) (AQ+PQ)/(AQ+PQ+O) 100 % 0 % 0 % 100 %
Table 10-2: Calculations Relative to Deployment of Qualified Faculty (RE: Standard 10) Name Qualification (Academic-AQ, Professional-PQ, Other-O) (From Table 10.1) AQ Faculty- % of Time Devoted to Mission (From Table 10.1) PQ Faculty- % of Time Devoted to Mission (From Table 10.1) Other2 Faculty - % of Time Devoted to Mission (From Table 10.1) Qualification Ratios Per STD 10 Management/ HR Cheokas, Gaynor PQ 100 0 Meets requirement for AQ (AQ=54.79%) Fathi, Michael AQ 100 0 Grimes, Mark PQ 30 0 Heshizer, Brian AQ 100 0 Jourdan, Zack AQ 100 0 Ledman, Robert AQ 100 0 Murie, Shaun PQ 20 0 NeSmith, Bill PQ 40 0 Perry, Shannon PQ 50 0 Stone, Eric PQ 20 0 Wilson, Liz PQ 70 0 TOTAL MANAGEMENT/HR 400 330 0 Meets requirement for (AQ + PQ)=100% 54.79 % 45.21 % 0.00 % AQ/(AQ+PQ+O) 54.79 % (AQ+PQ)/(AQ+PQ+O) 100 % Name Qualification (Academic-AQ, Professional-PQ, Other-O) (From Table 10.1) AQ Faculty- % of Time Devoted to Mission (From Table 10.1) PQ Faculty- % of Time Devoted to Mission (From Table 10.1) Other2 Faculty - % of Time Devoted to Mission (From Table 10.1) Qualification Ratios Per STD 10 Marketing
Maldonado, Cecilia AQ 100 0 0 Meets
requirement for AQ=100 %) Stovall, John AQ 100 0 0 Valentine, Dawn AQ 100 0 0 TOTAL MARKETING 300 0 0 Meets requirement for (AQ + PQ)=100% AQ/(AQ+PQ+O) 100.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % 100 % (AQ+PQ)/(AQ+PQ+O) 100 % Name Qualification (Academic-AQ, Professional-PQ, Other-O) (From Table 10.1) AQ Faculty- % of Time Devoted to Mission (From Table 10.1) PQ Faculty- % of Time Devoted to Mission (From Table 10.1) Other2 Faculty - % of Time Devoted to Mission (From Table 10.1) Qualification Ratios Per STD 10
GRAND TOTAL FOR
SCHOOL 1,200 530 0.00 % Meets require ment for AQ = 69.36 % Meets require ment for (AQ + PQ= 100%) RATIO 69.36 % 30.64 % 0.00 % AQ Ratio: AQ/(AQ+PQ+O) 69.36 % AQ and PQ Ratio: (AQ+PQ)/(AQ+PQ+O) 100 %
3. Instruments and processes for Assurance of Learning should be coordinated and
reviewed by the Assessment Committee. (Standards 16 & 18)
Response:
The School of Business Assessment Committee (Dr. Cecilia Maldonado, Chair, and Carol Bishop, Co-chair) has:
a) Reviewed the School of Business Assurance of Learning Manual, learning plan, learning goals, and instruments. As a result, the committee decided to provide a separate Assurance of Learning Manual for the undergraduate program and the graduate program. (Please see the Assurance of Learning Manual for Undergraduate and the Assurance of Learning Manual for Graduate. b) Systematically implemented the plan in conjunction with the faculty. Please see the Report of
the Assessment Committee 2007-2008.
c) Continued implementation of the plan during the current academic year. Please see the Preliminary Report of the Assessment Committee 2008-2009.
4. Although faculty discussions indicated that direct measures of Assurance of Learning
were present, process should be established to report and collect those data. (Standards
16 & 18)
Response:
The Assessment Committee has developed and faculty approved the process of collecting AOL data using direct measures. The Committee in collaboration with faculty has collected, analyzed, and reported AOL data to the School of Business faculty. Please see the Report of the Assessment Committee 2007-2008 and the Preliminary Report of the Assessment Committee 2008-2009.
5. Measures of graduate program objectives are not currently at a mature stage. Direct
and indirect assessments should be clarified and implemented during the next year.
(Standard 18)
Response:
The Assurance of Learning Manual for Graduate and the Report of the Assessment Committee 2007-2008 and the Preliminary Report of the Assessment Committee 2007-2008-2009 show that the MBA program Assurance of Learning is at a mature stage.
