• No results found

How To Treat Eye Sight Problems With Eye Care

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "How To Treat Eye Sight Problems With Eye Care"

Copied!
32
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)
(2)

Dealing With

Dealing With

The Refractive Surprise

The Refractive Surprise

Richard S. Hoffman, MD

Richard S. Hoffman, MD

Clinical Associate Professor of Ophthalmology Clinical Associate Professor of Ophthalmology

Casey Eye Institute Casey Eye Institute

Oregon Health and Science University Oregon Health and Science University

(3)

No Financial Interest

No Financial Interest

(4)

Why The Surprise?

Why The Surprise?

•• Correct patient / Correct lensCorrect patient / Correct lens •• Long or short eyeLong or short eye

•• Proper IOL formula Proper IOL formula –– Holladay 2Holladay 2 •• Proper IOL formula Proper IOL formula –– Holladay 2Holladay 2 •• Data inserted correctlyData inserted correctly

(5)

Is It Easily Reversible?

Is It Easily Reversible?

•• Lens properly insertedLens properly inserted

– Crystalens upside-down yields myopic shift

•• Capsular blockCapsular block

– Reversed easily with YAG – Reversed easily with YAG

•• Lens exchangeLens exchange

– Can’t guarantee second lens will be right unless you know why the first lens was wrong

– ? For small errors

(6)

Best Treatment for Enhancement

Best Treatment for Enhancement

Piggyback versus Corneal Refractive Surgery Piggyback versus Corneal Refractive Surgery

•• PiggybackPiggyback

– Straightforward

– Somewhat accurate

– Relatively expensive compared to LASIK

Staar AQ5010

– Relatively expensive compared to LASIK

•• Corneal Refractive SurgeryCorneal Refractive Surgery

– Straightforward

– Generally accepted as benign procedure – Treats astigmatism at the same time

(7)

Piggyback IOL Calculations

Piggyback IOL Calculations

Piggyback IOL Calculations

Piggyback IOL Calculations

(8)

Piggyback IOL Calculations

Piggyback IOL Calculations

Easily calculated utilizing Easily calculated utilizing the Holladay IOL Consultant the Holladay IOL Consultant

(R Formula) (R Formula)

(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)

Piggyback IOL Calculations

Piggyback IOL Calculations

No Holladay IOL Consultant No Holladay IOL Consultant

(13)

Piggyback IOL

Piggyback IOL

Gills Nomogram Gills Nomogram

••

Underpowered Pseudophake (Hyperope)

Underpowered Pseudophake (Hyperope)

1. Short Eye (<21mm): Power = (1.5 x SE) + 1 1. Short Eye (<21mm): Power = (1.5 x SE) + 1 2. Average Eye (22

2. Average Eye (22--26mm): Power = (1.4 x SE) + 1 26mm): Power = (1.4 x SE) + 1 3. Long Eye (>27mm): Power = (1.3 x SE) + 1

3. Long Eye (>27mm): Power = (1.3 x SE) + 1 3. Long Eye (>27mm): Power = (1.3 x SE) + 1 3. Long Eye (>27mm): Power = (1.3 x SE) + 1

••

Overpowered Pseudophake (Myope)

Overpowered Pseudophake (Myope)

1. Short Eye (<21mm):

1. Short Eye (<21mm): Power = (1.5 x SE) Power = (1.5 x SE) -- 1 1 2. Average Eye (22

2. Average Eye (22--26mm): Power = (1.4 x SE) 26mm): Power = (1.4 x SE) -- 1 1 3. Long Eye (>27mm): Power = (1.3 x SE)

(14)

Piggyback IOL

Piggyback IOL

Nichamin Nomogram Nichamin Nomogram

Sulcus IOL : AQ5010V Sulcus IOL : AQ5010V

•• Minus power = 1:1 (Minus power = 1:1 (--2D SE = 2D SE = --2D IOL)2D IOL)

(15)

Piggyback IOL

Piggyback IOL

Brown’s Refractive Reasoning Brown’s Refractive Reasoning

0.50 D IOL power = 0.37 D at the spectacle plane 0.50 D IOL power = 0.37 D at the spectacle plane

(16)

Piggyback IOL Choices

Piggyback IOL Choices

Piggyback IOL Choices

Piggyback IOL Choices

(17)

AMO Sensar

AMO Sensar

•• AcrylicAcrylic

•• 6.0 mm optic6.0 mm optic

•• 13.0 mm overall length13.0 mm overall length •• 13.0 mm overall length13.0 mm overall length •• OptiEdge (rounded front)OptiEdge (rounded front)

– ↓ Pigment dispersion

(18)

Staar AQ 2010 and AQ5010

Staar AQ 2010 and AQ5010

Thin Optic Edges Thin Optic Edges

•• SiliconeSilicone

•• 6.3 mm optic 6.3 mm optic ( larger optic = ( larger optic = ↓ iris capture )↓ iris capture )

•• AQ2010AQ2010 13.5 mm length 13.5 mm length +5 to +9 D (whole D steps) +9.5 to 30 D (half D steps) •• AQ5010AQ5010 14 mm length -4 to + 4 D (whole D steps)

(19)

Raynor Sulcoflex

Raynor Sulcoflex

•• Designed for sulcus placementDesigned for sulcus placement •• Hydrophilic acrylicHydrophilic acrylic

•• AberrationAberration--neutralneutral

6.5 mm aspheric optic 6.5 mm aspheric optic

Not FDA Approved

6.5 mm aspheric optic 6.5 mm aspheric optic •• Posterior concavePosterior concave

surface avoids physical contact between IOLs surface avoids physical contact between IOLs •• Undulating haptics with posterior 10Undulating haptics with posterior 10°° angulationangulation

– Reduced risk of Pigment Dispersion Syndrome – Rotational stability

(20)

Raynor Sulcoflex

Raynor Sulcoflex

Sulcoflex® Multifocal

(21)

How Long Do You Wait?

How Long Do You Wait?

Ideally as long as possible to allow LEC Ideally as long as possible to allow LEC metaplasia

metaplasia and fibrosis to be completedand fibrosis to be completed

– Refractive stability usually achieved by 2 weeks but can be longer

(22)

Piggyback IOL

Piggyback IOL

(23)

Excimer

(24)

How Long Do You Wait?

How Long Do You Wait?

LASIK vs. PRK LASIK vs. PRK

•• PRK can be done anytimePRK can be done anytime

•• LASIK LASIK –– When is the incision stable?When is the incision stable? •• LASIK LASIK –– When is the incision stable?When is the incision stable?

– Nobody knows for sure

– Marked elevation in IOP from microkeratome – Wait at least 6 weeks and probably 3 months – If unacceptable to patient then PRK

(25)

PRK or LASIK

PRK or LASIK

•• Many of these patients have received LRIsMany of these patients have received LRIs •• Small risk of epithelial Small risk of epithelial ingrowthingrowth

•• Small risk of epithelial Small risk of epithelial ingrowthingrowth

•• Tend to be older patients Tend to be older patients –– possible dry eyepossible dry eye •• For most patients For most patients –– PRK rather than LASIKPRK rather than LASIK

(26)

PRK

PRK

•• 20% Ethanol (1cc 100% Ethanol + 4 cc BSS)20% Ethanol (1cc 100% Ethanol + 4 cc BSS) •• 8.0 mm trephine or OZ marker8.0 mm trephine or OZ marker

•• 2020--30 seconds30 seconds

•• Remove easily withRemove easily with •• Remove easily withRemove easily with #64 Beaver blade #64 Beaver blade •• BCL BCL – Antibiotic – Non-steroidal – Steroid

(27)

Wavefront

Wavefront Treatments

Treatments

•• Usually not reliable through a multifocal IOLUsually not reliable through a multifocal IOL •• Do we want to treat multifocal aberrations?Do we want to treat multifocal aberrations? •• Just treat the manifest refractionJust treat the manifest refraction

(28)

Enhancements

Enhancements

•• Prepare patient prePrepare patient pre--opop

– Give percentages for enhancement – Give additional costs – No surprises – Undersell don’t oversell

(29)

Enhancements

Enhancements

(30)

Enhancements

Enhancements

(31)

Enhancements

Enhancements

•• Prepare patient prePrepare patient pre--opop

– Give percentages for enhancement – Give additional costs – No surprises – Undersell don’t oversell

•• Reassure patient postReassure patient post--opop

– Easily enhanced

– Enhancements are relatively safe – Try not to belittle their concerns

– Go the extra mile for the unhappy patient

(32)

Obrigado Obrigado

References

Related documents

Furthermore, I have a large close family who have been unstinting in their love and support, I have no immediate financial need to leave my home of 32 years and I have my work

If the household does not participate in a rosca, the husband and wife jointly decide whether or not to purchase the indivisible good, and thus choose the appropriate household

Before using the nanoLC for sample analysis, switch on the system and equilibrate the analytical column with mobile phase at a flow rate of 50 nl min − 1.. The UV lamp is

At the beginning of each period, prior to the realization of aggregate and individual shocks, we now permit the representative young agent in each market to offer a

To our knowledge, the present study is the first to quan- tify the health disutility related to knee OA using the gen- eric, preference-based SF-6D instrument in relation to

In brain and liver, partially also in heart, of SF's and WF's, under the influence of DNOC, a decrease in the percentage stimulation with increasing

This study examined the relationship between student use of substances and extent of participation in school and/or community sponsored sport or nonsport