• No results found

Chapter 16

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Chapter 16"

Copied!
6
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

CHAPTER 16

Answers to Multiple Choice –Theoretical

1.

a

6.

c

2.

b

7.

c

3.

d

8.

a

4.

a

9.

a

5.

a

10.

C

Solutions to Multiple Choice – Computational

1. b

Materials and In Process Inventory (MIP), June 1 P 10,000

Materials received 205,000

Materials and In Process Inventory (MIP), June 30 ( 12,500)

Materials used to be backflushed to finished goods P202,500

2. a

Raw materials purchased P880,000

Raw materials used (850,000)

Balance of MIP, end P 30,000

3. c

MIP inventory, beginning P 38,700 Raw materials purchased 680,000 MIP inventory, ending ( 41,900)

Materials to be backflushed to finished goods P676,800 Conversion costs to be backflushed to finished goods P 5,300

4. c

Raw materials purchased P550,000 Materials used: (21,000 x P25) (525,000) MIP inventory, ending P 25,000

Raw materials used P525,000

Conversion costs (21,000 x P20) 420,000

Finished goods 945,000

Cost of goods sold (20,000 x P45) (900,000)

Finished goods inventory, ending P 45,000

5. a

Raw materials purchased P5,300,000 Materials standard cost: (192,000 x P26) ( 4,992,000) MIP Inventory, ending P 308,000

(2)

6. d

Materials in April 1 MIP inventory balance: (31,000 – P1,400) P 29,600 Materials received during April 367,000 Materials in April 30 MIP, per physical count (P33,000–P1,800) ( 31,200)

Amount to be backflushed P 365,400

7. c

Materials in May 1 MIP balance: (P12,300 – P1,300) P 11,000 Materials received during May 246,000 Materials in May 31 MIP balance: (P12,100 – P2,100) ( 10,000)

Amount to be backflused P 247,000

8. c

Applied conversion costs P1,300,000 Actual conversion costs incurred:

Direct labor P200,000

Factory overhead 995,000 1,195,000

Overapplied conversion costs P 105,000

9. c

Materials used P 300,000

Applied conversion costs 1,300,000

Cost of goods sold P1,600,000

10. a

Materials backflushed from Finished Goods to Cost of Goods Sold:

Materials in June 1, MIP balance (P29,250 – P3,000) P 26,250 Materials received 562,500 Materials in June 30, MIP balance (P32,000 – P4,500) ( 27,500) Materials backflused to Finished Goods from MIP 561,250 Materials in June 1, Finished Goods (P30,000 – P10,000) 20,000 Materials in June 30, Finished Goods (P26,250 – P8,750) ( 17,500) Materials backflused to Cost of Goods sold P 563,750 Adjustment of conversion cost to Cost of Goods Sold:

In MIP: (from P3,000 to P4,500) P1,500

In FG: (from 10,000 to P8,750) 1,250 ( 2,750)

Cost of Goods Sold, June 30 P 561,000

11. a

Materials in MIP, June 30 P 12,500 Materials in MIP, June 1 (10,000)

Materials used 202,500

(3)

Solutions to Problems

Problem 16-1

(a) Materials and in Process inventory (MIP) 440,000

Accounts payable 440,000

To record materials purchased.

(b) Conversion costs 211,000

Various accounts 211,000

To record conversion costs incurred

(c) Finished goods inventory 625,000

Materials and in Process inventory (MIP) 425,000 Applied conversion costs 200,000 To record cost of finished goods.

(d) Cost of goods sold 595,000

Finished goods inventory 595,000 To record cost of goods sold.

Problem 16-2

(a) Materials and in Process inventory (MIP) 2,754,000

Accounts payable 2,754,000

To record materials purchased.

(b) Conversion costs 723,600

Various accounts 723,000

To record actual conversion costs incurred.

(c) Finished goods inventory (26,800 x P130) 3,484,000

MIP inventory (26,800 x P102) 2,733,600 Applied conversion costs (26,800 x P28) 750,400 To record cost of finished goods

(d) Cost of goods sold (26,500 x P130) 3,432,000

(4)

Problem 16-3

(a) Conversion costs 723,600

Various accounts 723,600

To record actual conversion costs incurred.

(b) Finished goods inventory 4,234,400

Accounts payable 3,484,000

Applied conversion costs 750,400 To record cost of finished goods.

(c) Cost of goods sold 3,432,000

Finished goods 3,432,000

To record cost of finished goods.

(d) Applied conversion costs 750,400

Conversion costs 723,600

Cost of goods sold 26,800 To record disposition of under/over applied

conversion costs.

Problem 16-4

(a) Materials and In Process Inventory 550,000

Accounts payable 550,000

To record materials purchased.

(b) Conversion costs 440,000

Various accounts 440,000

To record actual conversion costs incurred.

(c) Finished goods inventory (21,000 x P45) 945,000

MIP inventory (21,000 x P25) 525,000 Applied conversion costs (21,000 x P20) 420,000 To record cost of finished goods.

(d) Cost of goods sold (20,000 x P45) 900,000

Finished goods inventory 900,000 To record cost of goods sold.

(5)

Problem 16-5

(a) Materials inventory 550,000

Accounts payable 550,000

To record materials purchased.

(b) Conversion costs 440,000

Various accounts 440,000

To record actual conversion costs incurred.

(c) Cost of goods sold 900,000

Materials inventory 500,000

Applied conversion costs 400,000 (d) Applied conversion costs 400,000

Cost of goods sold 40,000

Conversion costs 440,000

To closed under or over-applied conversion costs.

Problem 16-6

(a) No entry for materials purchased

(b) Conversion costs 440,000

Various accounts 440,000

(c) Finished goods inventory 945,000

Accounts payable 525,000

Applied conversion costs 420,000 To record cost of finished goods.

(d) Cost of goods sold 900,000

Finished goods inventory 900,000 To record cost of goods sold.

(e) Applied conversion costs 420,000 Cost of goods sold 20,000

Conversion costs 440,000

(6)

Problem 16-7

(1) (a) Equivalent Production: [5,000 + (40 x 50%) = 5,000 P250,525 ÷ 5,020 = P49.905 per unit (b) P250,000 ÷ 5,000 = P50 per unit (c) Units started : (5,000 + 40 - 35) = 5,005 P250,000 ÷ 5,005 = P49.950 per unit (2) 40 x .50 x P49.905 = P990 40 x .50 x P50 = P1,000 40 x .50 x P49.950 = P999

(3) Considering that the results of Requirement (2) were within two pesos of each other, then method (b) would be recommended because of its simplicity.

References

Related documents

The process owner makes change happen through process councils, which are networks of process managers (shown in Figure 6) who represent that process in different business

Do you think that the primary supplier expected the introduction of LSPA to influence the staffing structure within the laboratory.. If

With this configuration, the Cooling in the Unit Controller will be activated based on the values coming from the Math 1 function, which is a weighted average of all cooling

A 12 week randomised placebo- controlled trial in 61 children with neurofibromatosis type 1 showed no effect of simvastatin on cognitive function and MRI abnormalities, with

 After-dinner speeches are best thought of as a kind of speech to entertain, and they usually have a lighter tone than. informative or

Home About Contributors Podcasts Current Themes Thinkers on Europe Book Reviews  Supported by the LSE’s European Institute Recent Paris attacks: Why France must avoid viewing

 Observations show a discrepancy between the mass of the universe required for critical density and the apparent mass density. This is known as the missing mass problem. It is

However at the microeconomics level development of accounting methodology for the most important environmental re- source – land, ensuring reporting the impact of