• No results found

Relationship with International Situation Description by Table. Extraction of the four patterns of behavior Two Patterns of Behavior.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Relationship with International Situation Description by Table. Extraction of the four patterns of behavior Two Patterns of Behavior."

Copied!
96
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)
(2)
(3)

Table of Contents

Gases and Liquids. Classification of behavior and society.

Applications to life and humans.

Video and Image Description.

Basic Pattern Examples

■ (molecular physics, chemistry) Gaseous molecular

motion/liquid molecular motion. Physical Motion Patterns.

(Sensory, perceptual psychology) Moisture sense (dry (dry)/wet (wet) individuals)

■ (Biology) Spermatic/egg-like behavioral patterns.

■ (Sex Differences Psychology. Sociology of Gender

Differences.) Masculine Personality / Feminine Personality.

Masculine Behavioral Styles/Feminine Behavioral Styles.

(Masculine/Feminine Personality. Paternalistic Personality/Maternal Personality.)

■ (Geography, History) Migratory life/settled life.

Nomadic/farming people. Their mode of behavior.

□ Differences in the behavioral patterns of Westerners and Orientals and Russians.

□ Differences in the national character of Americans and Japanese

■ (the main ideology of social science) the difference between individualism and liberalism and collectivism and anti-

liberalism.

■ (the main ideology of social science) The difference between progressive and backward.

Differences in ideology and values between individuals

■ Differences in the position and behavior of the authority figures.

Correlation between different regions

(4)

Relationship with International Situation Description by Table.

Extraction of the four patterns of behavior

Two Patterns of Behavior. Correspondence with Survey Results

Gaseous Behavior/Liquid Behavior. A summary table of their nature.

Related information about my books.

References.

All the books I’ve written. A list of them.

The contents of my books. The process of automated translation of them.

(5)

Gases and Liquids. Classification of behavior and society.

Applications to life and humans.

Iwao Otsuka (NOTE)

An automated translation site used by the author. It can be found at www.DeepL.com/Translator

Video and Image Description.

Basic Pattern

Some of the same two patterns are commonly found in various areas and levels.

Some of the same two patterns are found in

many realms and worlds. The fundamental and important behavior and movement patterns of particles and individuals in them.

Here are the two patterns Video No. 1

(6)

Video No. 2

The basic and important patterns are as follows.

The following (1) is the following (2).

(7)

(1) A general individual or particle.

(2) A movement that satisfies the following two conditions: A general individual or particle.

Then, the following (1-1) shall be (2-1) (1-1) Individuals and particles.

(2-1) to move in characteristic patterns that are distinctly different from each other.

The conditions are as follows.

(1) Fast speed/slow speed.

(2) No mutual attraction between the two parties / mutual attraction between the two parties

When the speed is fast and the attraction between each other does not work. That is pattern #1.

When the speed is slow and the gravitational force between the two is working. That is pattern #2.

These two patterns represent the characteristics, principles and claims of life, human beings and society. They have traditionally been discussed repeatedly in the fields of politics, society, history, etc.

These two patterns are particularly powerful in realizing

clarification of the differences in ethnicity and national identity.

We will name these two patterns of society as follows.

(1) Gaseous Behavior.

(2) Liquid behavior

(1) An ideology that attempts to move in the mode of action of gaseous behavior. The author names it as Gasism.

(2) An ideology that seeks to move in the mode of action of liquid behavior. The author names it as Liquidism.

Video (1) Gaseous behavior (gasism).

(8)

Video (2) Liquid Behavior (Liquidism)

The arrows represent the action of the forces between individuals and

(9)

particles as follows.

Video (1) Gaseous behavior (gasism)

Video (2) Liquid Behavior (Liquidism)

(10)

From this, we can see the following.

(1) In gaseous behavior, there is not much force between individuals and particles, and they are highly independent.

(2) In the liquid behavior, the interaction of forces between individuals and particles is large.

(1) A society in which each individual and particle takes gaseous action.

It is a gaseous society.

(2) A society in which each individual and particle behaves like a liquid.

It is a liquid society.

Examples

The following motions and modes of action are examples of gaseous and liquid behaviors.

■ (molecular physics, chemistry) Gaseous molecular

motion/liquid molecular motion. Physical Motion Patterns.

Video (1) Gas molecular motion.

(11)

Video (2) Liquid molecular motion

This is due to the following (1) differences between (2)

(12)

(1-1) Fast molecular motion speed (gas molecules)/slow molecular motion speed (liquid molecules).

(1-2) No intermolecular force (gas molecules) / Yes intermolecular force (liquid molecules)

(2-1) Gas behavior = gas molecular motion (2-2) Liquid behavior = liquid molecular motion

(Sensory, perceptual psychology) Moisture sense (dry (dry)/wet (wet) individuals)

Video (1) Dry individuals

Video (2) Wet individuals

(13)

This gives the following sensations to life and humans.

(1) Gaseous behavior = dry, dry sensation.

(2) Liquid behavior = wet, moist sensation

The cause of this is the analogy with the physical gas molecular motion/liquid molecular motion above.

(1) Gases provide a dry, dry sensation to life or human skin.

(2) A liquid provides a moist, wet sensation to life or human skin.

The same gas, air, gives different sensations to life or human beings as follows.

(1) When the number of water molecules present as a gas in the air is reduced. The humidity decreases. It gives a dry sensation to the human skin.

(2) If the number of water molecules present as a gas in the air increases.

The humidity increases. It gives a wet sensation to human skin.

The number of water molecules that can exist as a gas in the air. There is a limit to that. As humidity increases, water is less likely to vaporize. The drop in temperature triggers a change in the water molecules from being a gas to a liquid.

Here’s what happens when dry (dry) and wet (wet) populations interact

(14)

with each other.

Video Interaction (light blue individual is a dry individual. Pink

individuals are wet and wet individuals. (Arrows indicate the direction of force).

When a wet individual with liquid behavior comes in contact with a dry individual with gaseous behavior, it shows an inward, closed orientation.

This is because the arrow indicating the direction in which the force is directed swings inward.

This pattern is directly reflected in the different dry and wet personalities of life and humans.

(1) Gaseous behavior = dry, dry personality patterns of behavior in people.

(2) Liquid behavior = wet, wet personality behaviors of a person

Humidity differences in life and human character. It should be

represented by computer simulations. It can be represented by gaseous and liquid behavior.

■ (Biology) Spermatic/egg-like behavioral patterns.

(15)

Video (1) Spermatogenic

Video (2) Egg-like

(16)

In the above video, the display is as follows.

(1) Gaseous behavior. Spermatic character. Spermatic behavioral patterns.

Origins of masculinity.

(2) Liquid behavior. Ovular character. Ovular behavioral pattern. The origin of the female sex.

These differences relate to the fundamentals of sexual reproduction of life.

From this it is possible to derive the following.

■ (Sex Differences Psychology. Sociology of Gender

Differences.) Masculine Personality / Feminine Personality.

Masculine Behavioral Styles/Feminine Behavioral Styles.

(Masculine/Feminine Personality. Paternalistic Personality/Maternal Personality.)

Video (1) Masculine.

Video (2) Feminine

(17)

In the above video, the display is as follows.

(1) Gaseous Behavior. Masculine Personality. Masculine behavioral patterns. Male dominated society. Its values and social norms.

(2) Liquid behavior. Feminine character. Feminine behavioral patterns.

Female-dominated society. Its values and social norms.

The reason why it can be expressed in this way is that the difference in the degree of risk, risk-aversion is a fundamental difference in the behavioral patterns of men and women.

(1) Discarded and risk-taking individuals = men.

(2) Self-preserving, risk-averse individuals = women.

The following is about it.

(1) Gaseous behavior. Taking risks. To proceed more and more diffusely into the unknown and dark regions. Masculine.

(2) Liquid behavior. Avoiding risk. The same narrow, limited, known safe area that is already illuminated. Gathering together in a concentrated manner inside it and remaining motionless. Feminine.

Now notice the arrows of each individual in the video. These arrows indicate the action of the forces on that individual.

(1) Gaseous behavior = masculine behavioral style.

(18)

Because each individual acts independently and freely, there is no constant force working between each individual, and each individual is usually relaxed.

(2) Liquid behavior = feminine behavioral style.

Each individual looks out for each other and tries very hard not to be driven out of the safety zone. As a result, each individual is in a constant state of tension with each other, never able to relax.

The gender differences in behavioral patterns between men and women can be represented in computer simulations in terms of gaseous and liquid behaviors.

(1) Paternity is an aspect of male parenthood that produces gaseous

behavioral patterns and determines the behavioral patterns of children in a gaseous way.

(2) Motherhood is the aspect of female parenthood that produces a liquid mode of behavior and determines the child’s mode of behavior in a liquid way.

■ (Geography, History) Migratory life/settled life.

Nomadic/farming people. Their mode of behavior.

Videos (1) Mobile dwellers. (2) Nomads.

(19)

Movie (2) Sedentary people. Agrarian.

In the above video, the indications are as follows.

(1) Gaseous behavior = mobile dwellers. Nomadic people. Their mode of behavior.

(2) Liquid behavior = sedentary dwellers. Agrarian. Their mode of behavior.

The reasons for this expression are based on the differences in lifestyle between the two.

Dry/wet differences in the climate of the place of residence.

(1) Arid climate. Dry climates. Nomads.

(2) Humid climates. Wet climates. Agrarian.

An arid climate is suitable for the realization of the growth of grasses eaten by livestock for mobile and nomadic life.

Humid and hot climates are suitable for the realization of the growth of cultivated plants for a sedentary, agricultural lifestyle.

This difference in environment in terms of humidity. This makes the difference between gaseous behavior (migration and nomadism) and liquid behavior (settlement and farming).

(1) Nomadic is a mode of production that relies on migratory animals.

(20)

(2) Farming is a mode of production that relies on plants that do not migrate.

(1) Nomadism is migration. (Animals move in search of grass.) (2) Farming is settlement. (Plants are rooted in one place and do not move.)

(1) In gaseous behavior, individuals move at high speeds.

(2) In liquid behavior, individuals move very little and are sedentary.

This difference applies to the following behaviors.

(1) Gaseous behavior (nomadic) (2) Liquid behavior (farming)

(1) Nomadic grazing is low-density, coarse grazing over a large area.

(2) Farming is intensive with high density and density over a small area.

(1) In gaseous behavior, each individual is distributed in low density over a large area.

(2) In liquid behavior, each individual is distributed in high density over a small area.

This difference applies to the following behaviors.

(1) gaseous behavior (nomadic), and (2) Liquid behavior (farming)

Differences in the behavioral patterns of nomads and agrarians.

Differences in the behavioral patterns of mobile and sedentary people.

These can be expressed in computer simulations in terms of gaseous and liquid behaviors.

The following is an example of the interaction between nomadic and agrarian peoples. This can be seen as a simulation of the historical

conflict between, for example, the Han Chinese and the northern nomadic peoples. This can be seen as a simulation of historical conflicts between, for example, Russian agrarian tribes and Mongolian nomadic tribes.

Video (If the agrarian tribes are heavy and strong, they will not be moved when the nomads attack them)

(21)

Video (If the peasants are lightly vulnerable, they can easily be dispersed when the nomads attack them)

With this application, the following differences can be expressed

(22)

□ Differences in the behavioral patterns of Westerners and Orientals and Russians.

Western Europe is a pastoralist and depends on both nomadic and wheat farming for its livelihood. The climate is dry, but not as dry as the deserts.

Western Europe is not as wet as the monsoons of East Asia.

Western Europe is moderately dry and wet.

Western Europe is a ranch-type climate area according to Tetsuro Watsuji’s classification.

Western Europe is not as nomadic and migratory as Arab, Jewish, Turkish and Mongolian climates.

Western Europe is not as agrarian and sedentary as East Asia (the East) and Russia.

Western Europe is an intermediate type between nomadic and agrarian.

That is a characteristic of Western Europe (Westerners).

Western Europe (Westerners) are in between the following.

(1) Gaseous behavior (purely nomadic. Purely mobile people.)

(2) Liquid behavior (purely agrarian; purely sedentary dwellers. Pure sedentary dwellers.)

When comparing the West with the East and Russia. It will consist of the following.

(1) The West is relatively closer to gaseous behavior.

(2) The East and Russia are relatively close to liquid behavior.

The difference in behavioral patterns between Westerners and Orientals and Russians. When it is expressed in a computer simulation.

It can be expressed in terms of the difference between gaseous and liquid behavior.

Video (1) Relatively gaseous behavior = Western (Western) people’s behavioral patterns.

(23)

Video (2) Relatively Liquid Behavior = Behavioral Styles of Orientals (East Asia) and Russians

This subset can represent the following.

(24)

□ Differences in the national character of Americans and Japanese Video (1) Relatively gaseous behavior = American behavioral patterns

Video (2) Relatively Liquid Behavior = Japanese Behavioral Pattern

(25)

Americans are mainly pastoralists of Western European origin.

The Japanese are rice farmers.

The behavioral patterns of pastoralists are relatively close to gaseous behavior.

The behavioral pattern of rice farmers is close to liquid behavior.

From this, the following expressions can be made.

(1) Americans can be expressed in terms of gaseous behavior.

(2) Japanese people can express their behavior in liquid form.

The difference in behavioral patterns between Americans and Japanese.

This is a case of expressing it by computer simulation. It can be expressed in terms of gaseous behavior and liquid behavior.

China, Korea, Japan, or Russia are all agrarian rice farmers or field farmers. If we express this in terms of behavioral patterns, they all have liquid behavior in common.

The gender relations of the more nomadic Western (Western European and American) peoples (assuming monogamy) that operate on gaseous behavior. It can be represented, for example, as follows

Video A mobile couple. A nomadic couple. The way they stick together and move independently and unassisted by their surroundings.

(26)

The gender relations of the more agrarian Eastern (Chinese, Japanese) and Russian peoples (assuming monogamy) that operate on liquid behavior. It can be expressed, for example, as follows

Video A married couple of sedentary people. An agrarian couple.

Husbands are attracted to and attached to their wives’ group.

(27)

Above, national character has its common parent movement patterns (gaseous and liquid behavior). Differences in national character can be seen as concrete examples of.

■ (the main ideology of social science) the difference between individualism and liberalism and collectivism and anti-

liberalism.

Video (1) Gaseous behavior = individualist and liberal modes of action

(28)

Video (2) Liquid Behavior = Collectivist and Anti-Liberal Behavioral Styles

(1) A mode of behavior in which there is individual freedom and independence. That is gaseous behavior.

(29)

(2) A mode of action without individual freedom and independence. That is liquid behavior.

(1) Individuals’ opinions are respected. That is gaseous behavior.

(2) A mode of behavior in which the group is prioritized over the individual and the individual is subordinate to the group. That is liquid behavior.

(1) The private sphere of the individual is preserved. The private sphere of the individual is secured.

(2) It is a mode of behavior in which the private sphere of the individual cannot be secured. That is liquid behavior.

The difference between individualist/liberal and collectivist/anti-liberal modes of behavior. When they are represented by computer simulations.

It can be represented by the difference between gaseous behavior and liquid behavior.

■ (the main ideology of social science) The difference between progressive and backward.

Video (1) Gaseous Behavior = Advanced Behavioral Pattern

(30)

Video (2) Liquid Behavior = Backward Behaviour

(1) Actively moving and diving into new and unknown areas of risk.

Therefore, be able to gain new knowledge ahead of time. Individuals who

(31)

are capable of achieving this. That is the individual with gaseous behavior.

(2) To take no risks and to stay in the area of known light that they have been in forever (indicating a precedent or tradition that is considered safe). Therefore, to become a follower in terms of knowledge. That is the individual with liquid-like behavior.

(1) Risk-taking behavior. = Advanced (gaseous behavior).

(2) Risk-free behavior. Safety-taking behavior. = Backward (liquid behavior)

Differences in ideology and values between individuals

Individuals with different ideologies and values from each other. On how they behave. It can be seen that there is a big difference between gaseous and liquid behavior. When individuals with the same ideology and values are represented with the same color. It would be displayed as follows.

Video (1) Gaseous behavior. Different ideologies and values. Individuals with those values clashing with each other on an individual basis. Non- harmonic behavior.

Video (2) Liquid behavior. Same ideologies, values. Closed, exclusive

(32)

cohesion between individuals who hold them. Harmonious behavior.

(1) Gaseous behavior. There, we find the following

Individuals with different ideologies and values among themselves. Their mixing with each other while moving around at high speed. Clashes and collisions on an individual basis. There, the following content is ensured Diversity of ideologies and values. Nonconformity.

(2) Liquid behavior. There you will find the following content.

Individuals of the same ideology and values among themselves. Their closed, exclusive affiliation, cohesion and grouping. Their slow and less mobile settlement. Groups of different values do not mix with each other and are subversive negotiations. There, the following content is ensured Homogeneity, synchronicity and unity within the group. ■ The

harmonization of the group.

■ Differences in the position and behavior of the authority figures.

Strong and powerful individuals under gaseous action.

They move as individuals with power.

They are heavy in mass.

They have a high speed of movement and acceleration.

(33)

They move at high speeds.

They use their overwhelming power to unilaterally kick the particles around them at breakneck speed and with great power.

They propel their way forward.

Fig. Powers in gaseous action (large blue individual in the center).

The strong and powerful under liquid action.

They are settled and located at the center, the center, within the group.

They are heavy in mass.

They are stuck in the ground, indigenized and immobile, adhering to the earth.

A liquid molecular collective.

There, the following (1) is considered to be the content of (2) below, and (3) below.

(1) Each particle

(2) To be close to the central, inner-city location of authority.

(3) To be viewed as a promotion or advancement within one’s own group.

The above (1) is followed by the following (4) actions.

(4-1) Proliferate disciplines to the central authority.

(4-2) Engaging in intense jealous foot-dragging with other particles who are trying to get closer to the central authority. To perform it repeatedly.

Fig. Powers that be in liquid behavior (big red individual in the center).

(34)

Liquid society. In it, individuals, particles, are distributed from the periphery to the center. It is accompanied by a power dynamic.

The further you go from the center, the darker the particle is. The more powerful the individual, the stronger the particle.

It starts out as a white, unpigmented rookie. The individual particle is gradually promoted towards its inner periphery. The more the individual particle is promoted, the darker the color it becomes.

Fig. Liquid power gradient and color shading

Correlation between different regions

For the above, we can also take correlations between the same patterns between the different regions, as shown in the following table.

(35)

Table_1

It describes, for example, the following linkages, correspondences Gaseous behavior-liquid behavior: agrarian-nomadic: sedentary life - mobile life: female - male: maternal - paternal

From the above it is possible to derive the following correspondences Western-Eastern, Russian: (Western Europe - East Asia, Russia): (US - Japan): masculine (male dominance) - feminine (female dominance):

gaseous behavior - liquid behavior

Western Europe-Japan: paternal-maternal: gaseous behavior-liquid behavior

An example of an answer to the above correspondence and application that can be derived from the correlation is the following.

The character of nomadic people is dry.

The character of agrarian people is wet.

Women are weak in the West.

Women are strong in the East and in Russia.

Men are weak in the East and Russia.

Men are strong in the West.

Women are fundamentally collectivist and anti-liberal.

Men are fundamentally individualist and liberal.

Japanese society is fundamentally collectivist and anti-liberal. It is the same as China, Korea and Russia, which are also agrarian societies.

Rice farming and agrarian societies are collectivist and anti-liberal.

Japanese society, Chinese society, Korean society and Russian society are feminine. It is a feminine society. It is a female-dominated society.

Migrant. They are nomads. They are advanced.

Sedentary. Agrarian. They are backward.

(36)

Men are progressive.

Women are backward.

America and Western Europe are advanced.

China, Korea, Japan and Russia are backward.

Relationship with International Situation

Both liquid and gaseous societies have risen and fallen repeatedly within the world’s human society. The repetition of this cycle will continue in the future.

Not long ago, there was a period of time when

(1) the following (1) is subjected to the following (3) acts by (2) (1) Liquid societies, such as China and Japan.

(2) Gaseous societies, such as those of Western countries.

(3) Greatly oppressed, attacked, eroded, and dominated unilaterally.

These days, liquid societies like China and Russia have become very powerful. They encircle gaseous societies, like those of Western

countries, one after another, making them hermetically sealed. The liquid society, in doing so, silences the movement of the gaseous society. The liquid society thus dominates the gaseous society as if it were a

subcontractor of its own society.

There is a new shift in the international situation in that direction.

Description by Table.

Extraction of the four patterns of behavior

In the above explanation, we have focused on two patterns.

To extract the two dimensions of velocity and mutual attraction from the particle’s behavioral pattern. Thereby, the following four types are to be extracted. It is possible to

(37)

Table_2.

They are as follows.

(1) Fast “gas molecule pattern = gas-like behavior” speed. They are free to move freely on an individual basis without the attraction between them.

(2) “Typhoon - Cyclone. Fireballs. A pattern of them. (3) “Fast speed. (2)

“Typhoon to cyclone” means that the gravitational attraction between the two parties is not present and the group moves in a group.

(3) “Scattering pattern. (3) “Scattering pattern”: slow speed.

(4) The speed of the “pattern of liquid molecules = liquid behavior” is slow. (3) The attraction between the two parties is activated and they move in groups.

This book first takes out and compares the more basic of these, (1) gas molecules and (4) liquid molecules, in order to contrast

Two Patterns of Behavior. Correspondence with Survey Results

Two patterns of gaseous and liquid behavior. They describe a wide range of behaviors, behavioral orientations, and principles at the same time, including the following

The author conducted a survey on the Internet around February 2006. As a result, the author clarified them.

I would like to request the following from the readers.

Take a cursory look at the following table to get a full picture of its contents.

Table_3

Details such as survey results analysis data. Getting to know it. Readers should refer to the resource section for this purpose.

(38)

This will enable us to achieve the following

The following trends should be derived, visually, from these behavioral patterns.

(Gaseous behavior/liquid behavior)

Mutual separation orientation / Mutual integration orientation Independent, self-reliant/interdependent orientation

Individualism/collectivism

Discrete / Concentration Oriented

Liberalism / Mutual Regulation Oriented

Readers are referred to the table below for more information on them.

Gaseous/liquid behavior. A summary table of their nature.

It is the following section

Gaseous Behavior/Liquid Behavior. A summary table of their nature.

Table_4

(39)

Table_1

Comparison Gaseous behavior (gasism)

Liquid behavior (liquidism) temperament dry (esp. as opposed to

dry) wet (i.e. dry)

lifestyle Migration, nomadism and cattle grazing

Settlement, farming (rice farming, …)

sex difference male dominance female dominance parental love

affair paternalistic maternal Regional

differences (big picture)

Western countries Orient

Regional differences (details)

Western Europe, North America and the Middle East

East Asia (Japan, China, South Korea) social system liberalism anti-liberalism

individualism collectivism

innovation advanced backward-looking Return to the top page.

Table_2

Comparison It’s fast. It’s slow.

Interdependent forces of attraction. Moving together as a group.

Typhoon - Cyclone patterns.

Comet - Fireball Pattern

Patterns of liquid molecular motion

= liquid behavior The inability of mutual

attraction to work.

Scattering.

Patterns of gas molecular motion

scattered village pattern

(40)

= gaseous behavior Return to the top page.

Table_3

Comparison

Gaseous behavior (gasism)

Liquid Behavior (Liquidism) molecular motion

gas molecular motion

pattern

liquid molecular motion pattern

humidity

dry (esp. as opposed to dry)

wet (i.e. dry) Lightness vs. darkness

Coldness vs. warmth

international comparison American Japanese style sex difference masculine feminine Fatherhood vs.

Motherhood paternalistic maternal Nomadic vs. Agricultural nomadic agrarian Urban vs. Rural urban rural Flirtation. To not flirt. Flirting.

Not being cute.

Risk vs. self- preservation.

To confront danger.

Self-preservation, safety, oriented to be protected.

Exploration. Preferring to explore.

Not liking exploration.

Originality vs. imitation. original imitative Conflict vs. harmony A preference

for conflict.

A preference for harmony.

(41)

Comparison

Gaseous behavior (gasism)

Liquid Behavior (Liquidism) Freedom vs. regulation. Preferringfreedom.

Preferring regulation.

Breaking vs. keeping rules.

Breaking the

rules. Observing the rules.

Privacy. There is

privacy. There is no privacy.

Independence vs.

dependence.

Being

independent. Being dependent.

Responsibility. Taking

responsibility.

Avoiding responsibility.

Openness vs. closure and

exclusion. open Closed and

exclusive Active vs. Passive active passive

mobility Mobility. Lack of mobility.

Autonomy. Autonomy. Lack of autonomy.

Competency-based (emphasis on individual competence).

Competency-

based. Not being ableist.

Tolerance of inequality vs. lateralism.

Tolerating inequality.

Preferring to be side by side.

Individuality. individualistic Not to be unique.

Return to the top page.

Table_4

Liquid behavior. Gaseous behavior.

Liquid Gas

Molecular motion type.

liquid molecular motion gas molecular motion Particles, general

movement of individuals.

(42)

Liquid behavior. Gaseous behavior.

Kinetic energy, activity and speed

Low kinetic energy. Not exercising.

Inactivity and inactivity.

High kinetic energy. Being athletic.

Active, being active.

Must be slow.

Being slow.

To be high speed.

Fast.

To stop, pause, stagnate.

To be settled, established. Not to move.

To be active.

Moving.

Small scale of movement.

Repeated micro- oscillations.

Large scale of movement.

Weakness of

movement. The movement is strong.

Attractive force, intermolecular force Attraction works.

Attraction. No attraction.

(Intermolecular forces

at work.) (No intermolecular forces acting.) Constant volume. To expand. To expand.

To stick together.

To approach.

To leave with ease.

To disengage.

To be continuous.

To connect.

To adhere.

To sever (a relationship).

To adhere.

To adhere. To peel off.

To adhere to.

To be attached to. To break up.

(43)

Liquid behavior. Gaseous behavior.

To come together.

Density.

To disperse.

Low density.

To unite or merge.

To be one. To be cohesive.

To be disjointed.

Being independent of each other.

To be separate.

Being the same. To be different.

To be on a different path.

Spaces, gaps, and

vacancies are small. Large spaces, gaps, and vacancies.

Man, creature’s character, behavior.

(Individual and individual levels to social, organizational and corporate levels)

Action speed

slow speed high speed

static dynamic

Passive Active

passive Active and dynamic Energy.

Inefficient, high cost. Efficient and low cost Reception and reception

oriented transmission-oriented Introduction, import-

oriented

Foreign conduction and missionary work, export-oriented

To dissolve, digest,

absorb, or take in. To produce, exhibit, output.

To take in or include (the other party)

(44)

Liquid behavior. Gaseous behavior.

To be passive, waiting for instructions, relying on others, relying on external pressure, being carried along.

Not taking action on your own.

Independent and spontaneous (To move on your own initiative.)

Subordinate. proactive postponed

(Decisions, decisions being avoided.)

To decide or decide.

Waiting. nimble

To be self-assertive and unassuming.

To catch (a projectile), cushion, buffer, absorb and soften an impact.

To launch, rush, or impact.

To be done something. To do something.

To be invaded or

violated. To invade or commit.

To be a victim.

To be a victim (of paranoia).

To be the perpetrator.

◆ Stop. Move

Stalled, stagnant Liquid, volatile, flow-oriented Immovable, entrenched

(settled), indigenous oriented

Movement, Diffusion Oriented (Rootless Weed)

Attachment to Land Indifference to the land

Weight Lightweight

To descend, to sink. To ascend, to fly.

(45)

Liquid behavior. Gaseous behavior.

Pointing to the earth (downward).

(Earth Mother Goddess worship)

Pointing upward in the sky

We believe in God, our Heavenly Father.

To be poised, seated

(liver, etc.), unmoved. To blow away.

To crush or press (with

weight). To shoot (through space).

To save or protect. Destruction, attack Conservative,

conservative, compliant and sympathetic

(Observe the rules.)

Subversive, offensive, anti-social.

Defensive and defensive

(Protecting and receiving)

Aggressive and challenging (Offensive)

Status quo, conservative, maintaining order

Transformative, reformative,

(destruction of the status quo order and) the establishment of a new order

demeritocracy (Focusing on the negative aspects of things.)

Additive Principle.

(Focus on the positive aspects of things.)

Negatives.

(Negative)

positive (Positively) pessimistic proactive Do not tolerate failure

or error. Tolerating failure and error.

◆ Micro. Macro

Microscopic. Macro.

Local, local things. Big picture, global.

(46)

Liquid behavior. Gaseous behavior.

(Small and compact.) (Wide things.) Subtle, small-minded. Bold.

Small, incremental.

(Minor improvements.) drastic

Weight Lightweight

A heavy, heavy-handed Lightweight, not having things.

Accumulative, stock- oriented.

Preservation.

Emphasis on erudition- oriented,

knowledgeable Emphasis on

memorization skills Being able to do anything.

Be a generalist. To be an all-rounders.

Specialize in (what you’re good at) Being a specialist To choose the right thing to do.

Direction of Action

Getting closer. Leaving.

To close the distance. Increasing the distance.

Constant volume. Volume expansion Do not spread. Do not

expand.

Maintain the current size of the area present.

Minimize the surface area. Surface tension should act.

to diffuse.

to expand. To expand.

To be pieced together.

To unite. To disperse.

(47)

Liquid behavior. Gaseous behavior.

To evangelize. To spread. To popularize.

To be local. To be limited.

Be narrow.

It must be global. (Big spread around the world.) No limitations.

Be wide. (Widely spread around the world.)

Localized. Local. Be universal. (Spread around the world.)

(Stop) expansion. (To expand.)

(To colonize an area.) To make it one’s own.

◆ Collective. Independent collectivism

(Preferring group and collective action.)

Individualism

(Individual, preferring to act alone.) Crowding, cohesion

(high density), concentration.

Dispersion, Diffusion (low density), Discrete

Crammed, crammed Spare, spacious.

Narrow distribution. Wide distribution.

Centralization-oriented (distinction and

discrimination between central and local

governments).

Decentralization-oriented.

Unipolar. multipolar Mainstream, majority

(major) oriented Respect for Minorities authoritarianism anti-authority

Entering and interacting in different fields.

Affiliation and

solidarity Free communal

(48)

Liquid behavior. Gaseous behavior.

Emphasis on Belonging and Belonging

(Emphasis on rootedness, no

affiliation, avoidance of freelance.)

Emphasis on free, disregard for affiliation

(Migratory birds, rootless plants)

Emphasis on touch Emphasis on solidarity,

connections and links cutting Relationship and

connection (nexus, faction) orientation (view of the nature of the relationship)

non-relationship oriented (The means and tools of relationship)

To be united. To be broken up.

Other, human and

manned orientation. uninhabited Communication,

Conversation, Dialogue Oriented

Discontinuity in communication, conversation and dialogue

Net, web-oriented atomic orientation Emphasis on physical

appearance

Limitations Freedom Regulation, Restriction,

Control and Controlism (A preference for

restriction and constraint.)

Liberalism.

(To prefer freedom.)

To check, to drag one’s feet.

To stop within a predetermined frame.

To go beyond or violate a predetermined boundary.

(49)

Liquid behavior. Gaseous behavior.

Non-competitive escalatory.

(Simultaneous subscribers rise

simultaneously in sync.)

Competitive

(No skipping, passing, or dropping out allowed.)

meritocratic

(Emphasizing an individual’s ability in personnel or other matters.

Showing off an individual’s abilities.)

Sharing achievements.

(Individual

accomplishments should be everyone’s, too.)

Results-oriented

(Emphasis on the individual who delivers results. (Flaunting

individual achievements.) Synchronization, side-

by-side, and equality orientation.

(Uniform, evenly oriented.)

Acceptance of Disparity

market fundamentalism Money and profit supremacy (Cut down on objects that do not produce a profit.)

the law of the jungle

(Devaluing the weak who cannot stand on their own.)

Same quality Heterogeneous

Common and identical. Being non-common. Being different.

Uniformity. Respect for Diversity (Psychological)

proximity and

assimilation of position

(Psychological) positional isolation homogeneous Heterogeneous and disparate.

(50)

Liquid behavior. Gaseous behavior.

Enforcement of homogenization (To drag the

conspicuous, the outlier, the stake out.)

To tolerate the presence of the outliers.

(To be immersive; to not stand out in a strange way.

Individualistic.

Ordinary, ordinary Strange, special.

Buried in the

surroundings Prominence.

Established self.

Matching, together.

A love of uniforms.

(To bring your

opponent down to the same level as you. To catch up with your opponent.)

Subordination and

dependence. Independence and control subordinate independent

dependent independent Unique struggle for supremacy

Leaving it to others, waiting for instructions (from others)

self-directed Being obedient. Being

obedient.

Insubordination. Disobedient.

Challenging.

To be threatened. To threaten (others).

(51)

Liquid behavior. Gaseous behavior.

To play the hand down.

To be humble. To be condescending.

Pretending to be

incompetent or helpless to reassure an opponent.

To play favorites.

To make an appeal.

To be exploited or deprived (of

possessions).

To exploit or deprive (of possessions).

Vulture.

To be attacked. To be attacked. To receive.

(Masochism.)

Attacking. Blaming. Attacking.

(Sadism.) To be raped. To be raped.

Self-preservation,

safety. Escorts

Self-preserving and regressive

Protecting yourself is a priority.

Shielded, escort-like

(Prioritize being a shield and protective barrier outside of someone else. (Putting the

protection of others before your own life.)

The abandonment of one’s own life.

To be protected and helped by someone else. To be protected.

Being in a convoy system. (To be protected by each other.)

Self-defense, self-help.

safety-oriented

(Safety and security are our top priority.

Avoiding danger.)

Danger Orientation

To tolerate danger. Actively confronting danger.

Avoiding failure. To tolerate failure.

Orientated to safety and

no mistakes. Oriented to take risks.

(52)

Liquid behavior. Gaseous behavior.

convoy-like

(Be safe. Do not be attacked by outside forces.

Confronting the outside world.

◆ Anti-privacy. Respect for privacy Anti-privacy (lack of

personal space)

privacy assurance

Personal space reserved.

Preferring a large room.

(Preferring to be in a room with everyone.)

Preferring to be in a private room.

(Preferring to be alone in separate rooms.)

Monitoring.

Concerned about other people’s eyes. (Feels like you’re being watched.) Feeling embarrassed.

Being sensitive to gaze.

Not being concerned about the eyes of others.

Being sensitive to the reputation and

reputation of others.

Trying to be seen well by others. Caring about one’s looks, makeup, and clothing Being vain.

Trying to get others to like you Flattery.

Trying to be admired by others. To be admired by others.

To follow one’s own path (one’s own unique path that one believes should be followed) without regard to others. (the unique path you think you should take) without regard to others.

Unity and integration Separation Unity and Integration

Oriented separation-oriented

(53)

Liquid behavior. Gaseous behavior.

Inclusion, inclusion and embrace.

To be in the “bag.

External release, to push off.

Acceptance, receptive. rounding down

To agree. To agree. To disagree. To refute. To disagree.

To sympathize.

To adore or follow.

To try to be liked, to flatter.

To be nurtured, to be in the pocket, to be

nostalgic.

To spoil.

To sulk.

(Rebellion rooted in the unacceptable.)

Forgive, forgive. Unforgiving and unforgiving.

Subjective. objective Cooperative and

sympathetic

unique

(To go my way alone.) To fit in.

To fit in.

Adhesion.

Trends, trend-oriented (Be sensitive to and follow the trends around you.)

(54)

Liquid behavior. Gaseous behavior.

Responsibility is

distributed and diffused.

Responsibility can be avoided.

Blame shifting is possible.

(Hard to identify whose fault it is, since it’s everyone’s action.

Blame is taken.

Not avoidable.

Cannot shift responsibility.

(Since it is a single act, it is difficult to pinpoint and identify whose fault it is.

Joint and several

liability. personal responsibility Unclearness of purpose,

goals, and direction of travel.

Clarity of purpose, goal, and direction of travel.

Otherness. Autonomy transitive autonomous To infect or transmit.

Harmony, unity. Disputes, differences harmony orientation conflict orientation reconciliation oriented litigation-oriented peace oriented war-minded

Harmonious and

Cooperative Orientation

Dissonance, Dissonance and Noise Orientation

matching orientation difference orientation

unanimous Majority rule, acceptance of fellowship

all-in-one orientation Coordinative and considerate

(Attentive.)

Dogmatic and direct.

(Do not be attentive.) Prior consultation,

decision-oriented (collusion, rooting)

Real-time (on-the-spot) decision orientation

(55)

Liquid behavior. Gaseous behavior.

Follow a pre-prepared

script. Act opportunistically.

vague Clarity

fuzzy orientation clarity-seeking A preference for

indirect expression. A preference for direct expression.

◆ Emotional. Cool-headedness Emotional, emotional,

moving. Unemotional and emotionless.

Irrational and

undivided. Rational, logical, divisive.

Cold-hearted, brutal, not thinking of people as people.

Each individual’s

territory is small. Each individual’s territory is wide.

Vision, field of view is

narrow. Visibility, field of view is wide.

Close-knit, cramming principle.

Acceptance of gaps, openings, and margins

Closed Open

closed open

(No gaps. No light

coming through. (Light shines through. There is a gap for light to enter.

Distinguish between inside and outside.

(Surface tension exists.)

Do not distinguish between inside and outside.

Denial of inner ring entry

(No visitors or strangers allowed.)

There is no concept of an inner circle.

(56)

Liquid behavior. Gaseous behavior.

External covert and secretive.

(facing inward)

Externally-exposure, revealing, expressing

(facing outward) Limited to intra-

company (internal), local, localized orientation

Global and universal oriented

Inescapable.

(Once you are within, once you belong, you cannot get out or leave.

If you escape, you will be treated as a traitor.

◆ Imitation. Creativity Preferring to be

imitative, imitating or

copying. Originality, sticking to the original.

Second best orientation.

(Just use the experience of first place and it should be easy.)

First, first, and lead oriented.

(Something I struggle with since it’s my first time.)

To be a guinea pig, a test subject.

Use the precedent already set, follow the precedent.

Set your own precedent, create a way for the next generation to advance.

Adhering to established theories

Violate established norms Violate established norms Overturn.

Breakthroughs.

Action speed x action direction

Low speed x

approaching. High speed x away.

Existing. Unknown.

(57)

Liquid behavior. Gaseous behavior.

Staying in existing, known areas

Entering uncharted and unknown territory

(Exploratory) Orienting the Light

Region

(An area that is already lit. The area where you can see what’s there.

The area where

someone is. Orienting to those areas.

Orienting the area of darkness.

(An area that is too dark to see. An area where you don’t know what is waiting for you. Orienting yourself to those areas.

Emphasis on precedent and tradition.

Emphasis on senior- junior relationships (A person with existing experience must be at the top of the list.

(Familiarity with existing correct knowledge.)

Expert and scholarly oriented.

(New land) development and research (discovery, invention) orientation

presumptuousness (Only do what you know in advance.)

Real-time (on the spot) turn out orientation

(To be identified in each case.)

◆ Backwardness. Advanced backward-looking advanced Pre-modern and

Transcendental Modern Other

Others

feminine masculine

maternal paternalistic

(58)

Liquid behavior. Gaseous behavior.

maternal rights system Patriarchy and patriarchy consanguineous unrelated

Love, sexual union Non-love, non-sexual agrarian

(Living on plant cultivation.)

Nomadic/pastoralist.

Living in animal husbandry.

(Japanese, Chinese, Korean, Southeast Asian, Russian.)

(Western, Nordic, North American, Arab, Mongolian.)

vegetative (Do not move.)

Animalistic (Moving.)

Rural. urban

oriental Western

wet (i.e. dry)

(Inscrutable, tearful, humane.)

Dry

(Divided, tasteless, uninteresting.) Properties of matter

(color, pitch, etc.)

Wet (damp, wet.) Dry (dry.) To be close to or

attached to. Separated.

Heavy, low, downward, downward

precipitation, earth- oriented.

Light, high, ascending, upward floating, sky-oriented

Dense, high density Thin, pale, low density, light consecutive Separate, cut, break, interrupt.

analog digital

Slow, slow Fast, fast Dehumidification of the

air in winter. (Dehumidifying the air in summer.

(59)

Liquid behavior. Gaseous behavior.

Soft, deforming,

catching. Hard, undeformed, bouncing back.

Curved, crooked. Straight, straight.

logical Organic and biological

(Clothing, foodstuffs, wood…)

Inorganic and physical

(machines, equipment, gears, concrete…)

Return to the top page.

(60)

Related information about my books.

References.

== Sex differences between men and women.

/ A review.

Bakan, D. The duality of human existence . Chicago: Rand- McNally. 1966.

Crandall, V. J., & Robson, S. (1960). Children’s repetition choices in an intellectual achievement situation following success and failure. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1960, 97, 161-168.(間宮1979 p178参照)

Deaux,K.: The Behavior of Women and Men, Monterey, California: Brooks/Cole, 1976

Goldstein, MJ (1959). The relationship between coping and avoiding behavior and response to fear-arousing propaganda.

Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1959, 58, 247- 252.(対処的・回避的行動と恐怖を誘発する宣伝に対する 反応との関係)

影山裕子 : 女性の能力開発, 日本経営出版会, 1968 間宮武 : 性差心理学, 金子書房, 1979

皆本二三江 : 絵が語る男女の性差, 東京書籍, 1986

村中 兼松 (著), 性度心理学―男らしさ・女らしさの心理 (1974年) , 帝国地方行政学会, 1974/1/1

Mitchell,G. : Human Sex Differences - A Primatologist’s Perspective, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, 1981 (鎮目恭 夫訳 : 男と女の性差 サルと人間の比較, 紀伊国屋書店,

(61)

1983)

Newcomb,T.M.,Turner,R.H.,Converse,P.E. : Social Psycholgy:The Study of Human Interaction, New York:

Holt,Rinehart and Winston, 1965 (古畑和孝訳 : 社会心理学 人間の相互作用の研究,岩波書店,1973)

Sarason, I.G., Harmatz, M.G., Sex differences and experimental conditions in serial learning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology., 1965, 1: 521-4.

Schwarz, O, 1949 The psychology of sex / by Oswald Schwarz Penguin, Harmondsworth, Middlesex.

Trudgill,P.:Sociolinguistics: An Introduction, Penguin Books, 1974(土田滋訳 : 言語と社会, 岩波書店, 1975)

Wallach M. A., & Caron A. J. ( 1959). “Attribute criteriality and sex-linked conservatism as determinants of psychological similarity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 59, 43-

50(心理的類似性の決定因としての帰属的規準性と性別

関連の保守性)

Wright,F.: The effects of style and sex of consultants and sex of members in self-study groups, Small Group Behavior, 1976, 7, p433-456

東清和、小倉千加子(編) , ジェンダーの心理学, 早稲田大 学出版部, 2000

宗方比佐子、佐野幸子、金井篤子(編), 女性が学ぶ社会心 理学, 福村出版, 1996

諸井克英、中村雅彦、和田実, 親しさが伝わるコミュニ ケーション, 金子書房, 1999

D.Kimura, Sex And Cognition, MIT

Press,Cambridge,Massachusetts, 1999. (野島久雄、三宅真季 子、鈴木眞理子訳 (2001)女の能力、男の能力-性差に ついて科学者が答える- 新曜社)

E.Margolies,L.VGenevie, The Samson And Delilah

Complex,Dodd,Mead &Company, Inc.,1986(近藤裕訳 サム ソン=デリラ・コンプレックス -夫婦関係の心理学-, 社会思想社,1987)

(62)

/ Each theory.

// Male alone.

E.モンテール (著), 岳野 慶作 (翻訳), 男性の心理―若い女 性のために (心理学叢書) , 中央出版社, 1961/1/1

// Female alone.

扇田 夏実 (著), 負け犬エンジニアのつぶやき~女性SE奮 戦記, 技術評論社, 2004/7/6

// Comparison between men and women.

/// Sex differences in ability

//// 1.1 Sex differences in spatial ability

Collins,D.W. & Kimura,D.(1997) A large sex difference on a two-dimensional mental rotation task. Behavioral

Neuroscience,111,845-849

Eals,M. & Silverman,I.(1994)The hunter-gatherer theory of spatial sex differences: proximate factors mediating the female advantage in recall of object arrays. Ethology &

Sociobiology,15,95-105.

Galea,L.A.M. & Kimura,D.(1993) Sex differences in route learning. Personality & Individual Differences,14,53-65 Linn,M.C.,Petersen,A.C.(1985) Emergence and

Characterization of Sex Differences in Spatial Ability : A Meta-Analysis. Child Development, 56, No.4, 1479-1498.

McBurney,D.H., Gaulin, S.J.C., Devineni,T. & Adams,C.

(1997) Superior spatial memory of women: stronger evidence for the gathering hypothesis. Evolution & Human

Behavior,18,165-174

Vandenberg,S.G. & Kuse,A.R.(1978) Mental rotations, a group test of three-dimensional spatial visualization.

Perceptual & Motor Skills, 47,599-601

Watson,N.V. & Kimura,D.(1991)Nontrivial sex differences in throwing and intercepting: relation to psychometrically- defined spatial functions. Personality & Individual Differences,12,375-385

(63)

//// 1.2 Sex differences in mathematical ability

Bembow,C.P., Stanley,J.C.(1982) Consequences in high school and college of sex differences in mathematical reasoning

ability : A Longtitudinal perspective. Am. Educ. Res. J.

19,598-622.

Engelhard,G.(1990) Gender differences in performance on mathematics items: evidence from USA and Thailand.

Contemporary Educational Psychology,15,13-16

Hyde,J.S.,Fennema,E. & Lamon,S.J.(1990) Gender differences in mathematics performance: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin,107,139-155.

Hyde,J.S.(1996) Half the human experience : The Psychology of woman. 5th ed., Lexington, Mass.: D.C.Heath.

Jensen,A.R.(1988)Sex differences in arithmetic computation and reasoning in prepubertal boys and girls. Behavioral &

Brain Sciences,11,198-199

Low,R. & Over,R.(1993)Gender differences in solution of algebraic word problems containing irrelevant information.

Journal of Educational Psychology,85,331-339.

Stanley,J.C., Keating,D.P., Fox,L.H. (eds.)(1974)

Mathematical talent: Discovery, description, and development.

Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.

//// 1.3 Sex differences in verbal ability

Bleecker,M.L.,Bolla-Wilson,K. & Meyers,D.A.,(1988)Age related sex differences in verbal memory. Journal of Clinical Psychology,44,403-411.

Bromley(1958) Some effects of age on short term learning and remembering. Journal of Gerontology,13,398-406.

Duggan,L.(1950)An experiment on immediate recall in secondary school children. British Journal of

Psychology,40,149-154.

Harshman,R., Hampson,E. & Berenbaum,S.(1983) Individual differences in cognitive abilities and brain organization,Part I:

sex and handedness differences in ability. Canadian Journal of Psychology,37,144-192.

Hyde,J.S. & Linn,M.C.(1988) Gender differences in verbal ablility:A Meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 104,

(64)

No.1,53-69.

Kimura,D.(1994)Body asymmetry and intellectual pattern.

Personality & Individual Differences,17,53-60.

Kramer,J.H.,Delis,D.C. & Daniel,M.(1988) Sex differences in verbal learning. Journal of Clinical Psychology,44,907-915.

McGuinness,D.,Olson,A. & Chapman,J.(1990)Sex differences in incidental recall for words and pictures. Learning &

Individual Differences,2,263-285.

//// 1.4 Sex differences in motor skills

Denckla,M.B.(1974)Development of motor co-ordination in normal children. Developmental Medicine & Child

Neurology,16,729-741.

Ingram,D.(1975)Motor asymmetries in young children.

Neuropsychologia,13,95-102

Nicholson,K.G. & Kimura.D.(1996) Sex differences for speech and manual skill.Perceptual & Motor Skills,82,3-13.

Kimura,D. & Vanderwolf,C.H. (1970) The relation between hand preference and the performance of individual finger movements by left and right hands. Brain,93,769-774 Lomas,J. & Kimura, D.(1976) Intrahemispheric interaction between speaking and sequential manual activity.

Neuropsychologia,14,23-33.

Watson,N.V. & Kimura,D.(1991)Nontrivial sex differences in throwing and intercepting: relation to psychometrically- defined spatial functions. Personality & Individual Differences,12,375-385

//// 1.5 Sex differences in perceptual abilities

Burg,A.(1966)Visual acuity as measured by dynamic and static tests. Journal of Applied Psychology,50,460-466.

Burg,A.(1968)Lateral visual field as related to age and sex.

Journal of Applied Psychology,52,10-15.

Denckla,M.B. & Rudel,R.(1974) Rapid “automatized”naming of pictured objects,colors,letters and numbers by normal children. Cortex,10,186-202.

Dewar,R.(1967)Sex differences in the magnitude and practice decrement of th Muller-Lyer illusion. Psychonomic

(65)

Science,9,345-346.

DuBois,P.H.(1939)The sex difference on the color naming test.

American Journal of Psychology,52,380-382.

Ghent-Braine,L.(1961)Developmental changes in tactual thresholds on dominant and nondominant sides. Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology,54,670-673.

Ginsburg,N.,Jurenovskis,M. & Jamieson,J.(1982) Sex

differences in critical flicker frequency. Perceptual & Motor Skills,54,1079-1082.

Hall,J.(1984)Nonverbal sex differences. Baltimore:Johns Hopkins.

McGuinness, D.(1972)Hearing: individual differences in perceiving. Perception,1,465-473.

Ligon,E.M.(1932)A genetic study of color naming and word reading. American Journal of Psychology,44,103-122.

Velle,W.(1987)Sex differences in sensory functions.

Perspectives in Biology & Medicine,30,490-522.

Weinstein,S. & Sersen, E.A.(1961)Tactual sensitivity as a function of handedness and laterality. Journal of Comparative

& Physiological Psychology,54,665-669.

Witkin,H.A.(1967)A cognitive style approach to cross-cultural research. International Journal of Psychology,2,233-250.

/// 2. Sex differences in personality

Maccoby, E.E. & Jacklin, C.N.(1974) The Psychology of sex differences. Stanford,CA:Stanford University Press.

/// 3. Sex differences in social behavior

Brehm,J.W.(1966)A theory of psychological reactance.

Academic Press.

Cacioppo,J.T. & Petty,R.E.(1980) Sex differences in

influenceability:Toward specifying the underlying processes.

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,6,651-656 Caldwell,M.A., & Peplau,L.A.(1982) Sex Differences in same-sex friendships. Sex Roles,8,721-732.

Chesler,M.A. & Barbarin,O.A.(1985) Difficulties iof providing help in crisis: Relationships between parents of children with cancer and their friends. Journal of Social

(66)

Issues,40,113-134.

大坊郁夫(1988)異性間の関係崩壊についての認知的研究, 日本社会心理学会第29回発表論文集,64.

Eagly,A.H.(1978) Sex differences in

influenceability.Psychological Bulletin,85,86-116.

Eagly,A.H. & Carli,L.L.(1981) Sex of researchers and sex- typed communications as determinants of sex differences in influenceability:A meta-analysis of social influence studies.

Psychological Bulletin,90,1-20.

Eagly,A.H. & Johnson,B.T.(1990) Gender and leadership style: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin,108,233-256.

Hall,J.A.(1984) Nonverbal sex differences:Communication accuracy and expressive style. Baltimore:John Hopkins University Press.

Hays,R.B.(1984) The development and maintenance of

friendship. Journal of Personal and Social Relationships,1,75- 98.

Horner,M.S.(1968)Sex differences in achievement motivation and performance in competitive and non-competitive situation.

Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. University of Michigan.

Jourard,S.M.(1971) Self-disclosure:An experimental analysis of the transparent self. New York:Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Jourard,S.M & Lasakow,P.(1958) Some factors in self- disclosure. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 56, 91-98.

Latane’,B. & Bidwell,L.D.(1977) Sex and affiliation in college cafeteria.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,3,571- 574

松井豊(1990)青年の恋愛行動の構造,心理学評論,33,355- 370.

Nemeth,C.J. Endicott,J. & Wachtler,J.(1976) From the ’50s to the ’70s:Women in jury deliberations,Sociometry,39,293-304.

Rands,M. & Levinger, G. (1979)Implicit theory of

relationship: An intergenerational study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,37,645-661.

坂田桐子、黒川正流(1993) 地方自治体における職場の リーダーシップ機能の性差の研究-「上司の性別と部下 の性別の組合せ」からの分析,産業・組織心理学研 究,7,15-23.

References

Related documents

In conclusion, Japanese macroeconomic news surprises matter for the intraday JPY/USD exchange rate, as do the direction of news surprises and the state of the Japanese business

In large networks with thousands of retail stations, it is humanly impossible to recommend prices for all grades at each station on a daily basis, honoring all the various rules

All this considered, this work aims at investigating both the heat storage potential during the hydration phase and the mechanical performance of cement pastes produced by adding 1%

The Gellideg Foundation Group in South Wales did a Gender Analysis during the application process for a three-year project addressing social exclusion and poverty in the

Furthermore, the loci affecting naturally occurring variation in olfactory response to benzalde- hyde were not the same in males and females, since the genetic correlation

Within that time frame, however, children can decompose a design task into subsystems, iterate on each subsystem, acquire relevant science concepts along the way, and

Using the frontier methods in a nonstructural approach, Hughes, Lang, Moon, and Pagano (1997) proposed a proxy for Jensen and Meckling’s agency cost: a frontier of the market value

This table reports the following variables: un-weighted risk management and disclosure practices ( RDPI ), weighted risk management and disclosure practices ( W-RDPI ), board