Internat. J. Math. & Math. Sci. VOL. 21 NO. (1998) 159-164
159
L
SPACES
FAIL A
CERTAIN APPROXIMATIVE PROPERTY
AREF KAMAL
Department
ofMathematics andComputer
SciencesU
A.E UniversityP.O Box
17551AI-Ain,
UNITED
AKAB EMIRATES
(Received May
4,1994)
ABSTRACT.
In
this paper the author studies some cases of Banach space that does not have theproperty
P1.
He showsthat ifX
glor.L
(ft)
forsomenon-purelyatomicmeasure#,thenX
doesnot have thepropertyP1.
He
also shows thatifX
Coo
orC’(Q)
forsome infinite compact HausdorffspaceQ,
thenX"
doesnothave thepropertyP.
KEY
WORDS AND
PHRASES: Property
P,
classicalBanachspacesel,
L (ft)
e,
compactwidth 1991AMS SUBJECT
CLASSIFICATION CODES:
41A65.1.
INTRODUCTION
The Banach space
X
is saidtohavethepropertyP,
ifforeach E>
0 and eachr>
0, there is 6>
0, suchthatfor eachzandtinX,
thereisz EB(z,
satisfyingthatfor each 0with0<
0<
6B(x,
r+
)
B(y,
r+
O)
C_B(z,
r+
O)
where
B(x, r)
istheopen ball ofradiusrandcenteredatz,andB(x, r)
is itsclouserzThe property
P1
plays
animportant roleinapproximation theory, andmanyauthorsusedit This property appearsinapproximation bycompact operators, simultaneous approximationand other areas(see
for exampleRoversi[I], Lau
[2],
Mach[3]
andKamal[4]).
Math[3]
showed thatifX isuniformlyconvexthenithas the property
P1
[3],
andthat ifXU(Q),
orX
B(Q)
thenX
hasthe propertyP1
[4].
Mach[4,
page259]
askedifthespace
L1 (kt)
has the propertyP1
In
thispaper
the author studies somecasesofnormedlinearspaceX,
forwhichX
doesnothave the propertyP1
In
section2, it isshown that ifX
71
thenX
doesnot have theproperty P1, and in section 3, it is shownthatif t is anon-purelyatomicmeasure,thenL
(#)
doesnothave the propertyP1
Thesetworesultsgiveanegative answerforthe questionof Math
[4] In
section3,it willbe shownalsothat if
X
(goo)’,
orX
(C’(Q))*,
whereQ
is an infinitecompactHausdorff
space,thenX
doesnothave the property
P1
In
thispaper
e
is the Banachspace
ofall realsequences
z{z,}
satisfying thatE
togetherwiththenorm
Ilxll-r
Im,
Also istheBanachspaceof all realn-tuplesx(x,x2,
...,zn)
together
withthenormIlmll
Im,
I.
t=l
2.
I1
DOES
NOT RAVE TRE PROPERTY
Theproof of the fact that
g
doesnothavethe propertyP
dependsonthe behaviorof thepropertyP
ing
In Lemma
2.3,itwillbe shown thatif>
0isfixed, and6n
corresponds
to forX
e
inLemma
21, then6,
0whenn oo,sousing the factthatg’
is anorm-one-complemented subspaceLEMMA
2.1. If theBanaehspaceX
has thepropertyP1
then foreache>
0,there is5>
0such thatforeach y EX,
there is z EB(0,
e)
such that if 0<
0<
5thenB(0,1+6+0)
NB(y,I+O)
C_B(z,
1PROOF.
Letr 1and lete>
0 be givenBy
the definition of the propertyP1
there is 6>
0 such that for eachxand y inX,
there is zB(x, e)
satisfyingthefollowing;foreach 8’such that 0<
0’<
6’B(x,
+
6’)
FlB(y,
1+
8’)
C_B(z,
1+
Let
x 0and61/2
6’,
thenfor all0satisfying0<
<
6;B(0,1
+6+)CB(y,
1+0)
C_B(0,1-t-6’)B(y,
1+0)
C_B(z,
1+0).
LEMMA
2.2. Letn_>
3 be apositive integer,let 6>
0begivenand let(zl
z)
beann-tuple of real numbersIf z, :>
6,
and for each_<
n-1Z
+...
+
z,_1 z,+
z,+1+...
+
z _<
6,then
[z[ >_
(2n
3)6.
,=1
PROOF. For
each 1,2 ,n, lety,z
+
+
z,-1 z,+
z,++
+
z,,,then=1 =1
=
(n-2)
-
..
,=I ,=I
Therefore
I.,I
_> lu,l _> (
2)6
H-(n
1)6
(2n
3)6.
LEMMA
2.3.Let
n>_
3 be a positive integerand let 6>
0 be a given real number such that(2n
5)6 <_
1 Then the elementx,(6,
6 6,(n
2)6)
ing
satisfiesthefollowingconditions(1)
V0 suchthat0>
0B(O,
1+
6+
O)
0B(x.,
1+
O) :fi
.
(2)
Ifz6g
and for each 0with 0<
0<
6;B(O,
1/5/O)
n
B(x,,
1-t-O)
C_B(z,
1-t-O),
thenllzll
_> (2,
3)5
’=lifi=
PROOF.
Let{e,},=
be thestandardbasis ing’,
that ise,
(x,
x,
...,x),
where x and x 0 if:/:
j and letn-1
(n
2)Seth
(5,
,
5(r- 2)5) e
e
X 5
ez
=1
Then
Ilxll
(n
1)5
+
(n
2)5
(2n
3)5 <_
1+
25<_
2+
5,
therefore for each 0 such that 0<0<6B(O,I
+6+
O)
F’IB(x,,,
I+0)
=/=
.
Assume
that z(zl,
z2,z)
Eg
is such thatforeach 0 with 0<
0<
5Lx
SPACESFAIL A CERTAIN APPROXIMATIVE PROPERTY 161It
willbe shownthat(1)
z
_>
6,
and(2)
foreach_<
Z
+...
+
Z_I Z+
Z,+I+...
+
Zn 6.Ifthese aretruethenby Lemma 2.2,
Ilzll
Il
(2n
3)6
=1
(1) Assume
thatZ+
+
z
<
6.Let
,-2
1
+
6 1(2n
5)
,=1 2
=(6,
.,6,1+6
1-(2n-5))
’
2Then
1+6
Ilull-
(-
2)6+---
+
1(2n- 5)6
=1+6.
On
theotherhandI1
11
1+
6 6+
+
(n
2)6
2 2
--1.
Thus,
foreach0 such that 0<
0<
6,
y E
B(0,1+6 +O) f3B(x,,l+O).
But
SOforany0<
(6-- =lkZ)
y"
B(z,
1+0).
(2) Assume
thatforacertainio
_<
n 12;1+.’.
+
go-1go
+
Zo++...
+
Zn>
6.Let
(1+6),
(__)
(
1+6
(1+6))
Y
2
%
en
0,0,...,0,----,0,...,0,
2 Ee.
Then
io-th
term162 AKAIVIAL
IlY-Zll=(n-2)+
--
+
+(n-2)
1 1
(2n- 5)a
(- )
+
+
2 =1.
Thus, foreach8 such that0
<
8<
,
y6B(0,
1+
+
8)
B(x,,
1+
).
But
e
l(y
+-..
+
y,o-
,o
+
,o+
+
+
y,)
(=
+
+
=,o-
=,0+
=,o++
+
]-
1(z
+...
+
z,o_ %+
Z,o++...
+
z,)l
I
+
[
+
(z
+
+
=,o-
=,0+
=,o.
+
+
>1.
Thus,
forsome8>
0, yB(z,
1+
8).
TEOM
2.4.l
doesnothave theprop
P
PROOF.
It llbesho thatforeach>
0, thereisxe
6gl,such thatif z6g
dfor l8 th0<<gitistmethatB(0,1+g+)B(x,l+)B(z,l+),
thenlz[[ >
.
Let
{e,},
be the stdd basis ing,
md let>
0b given If>
1thenforeach 8>
0B(o,
+ +
)
n
B(=,
1+)
g
B(o,
+
+
)
n
B(=, +).
Thusone cante
Xl tobexSo
thoutlossof genrgity one may assumethatLet n 3be apositiveimeger satisng
(2n- 5)
1 d(2n- 3) >
,
md let x, be as inLena
2.3 Definen--1
=
,
(
=)e.
(,
, ,
(.
=),
o,
o,
...) e
e,.
z=l
Then
[lxel[
[lx,
2+
,
thusB(O,I+6+8)B(xe, I+8)#
for 0<8<6.Let
P,
gl be themappingdefinedby P,
({
x,},
x,},
By
the constructionofx
itsimageunder
P,
is the elmentx, Assumethatforsomez6gB(O,I++8)B(x,I+8)B(z,I+8)
0<’8
<
,
thening
s(o,
+
+
)
s(=.,
z +
)
s(P.(z),
z +
)
o
<
<
,
Thus
by
Lena2.3[lP,(z)l[
(2n- 3)
>
.
Therefore1
I1=11
IIP,(=)ll
>
.
3.
OR SPACES T DO NOT
E PROPER
P
The
subspacc
Y
ofX
is cled ano-one-complememed subspacc
ofX
if there is a lineprojection
P"
X
Y
tisngthat[P[[
1. IfA
is asubset ofX,
md x6X
thend(=, A)
i{ll=
11;
e
A},
L1SPACES FAILACERTAINAPPROXIMATIVE PROPERTY 163
The compact widthof
A
inX
is definedbya(A,
X)
inf{ 6(A, K); K
is acompact subset ofX}.
The compact width is said to be attained if there is a compact subset
K
ofX
satisfying thata(A,X)
5(A,K)
In
this section it will be shown that ifX
(C(Q))*,
whereQ
is an infinitecompact Hausdorffspace,
X
(o0)’,
orX
L1
(#)
where # isnon-purely atomic measure,thenX
does not have the propertyP1.
Theproof of the following propositionis
elementary
PROPOSITION
3.1. LetX
be aBanachspace
thathasthe propertyP1,
and letY
be a closedsubspace of
X
IfY
is anorm-one-complementedsubspace
ofX,
thenY
hasthe propertyP1
COROLLARY
3.2. If#isnon-purely
atomicmeasure thenL1
(#)
doesnothave the propertyP1
PROOF.By
Feder[5,
Theorem2],
LI[0,1]
has a subsetA
for which the compact widtha(A,
LI[O,
1])
isnotattained,thusbyKamal[6,
Theorem4.3]
L[0,1]
doesnothave the propertyP,
but byLacy [7,
sec8],
L[0,1]
is a norm-one-complemented subspace ofLx(),
therefore by Proposition3 1,L1
(#)
doesnothavethepropertyP.
NOTE 3.3. Theorem 2.4 togetherwithCorollary 3.2giveanegativeanswertothe question of Mach
[4, page 259].
COROLLARY
3.4. fixo
orX
C(Q)
forsomecompactinfiniteHausdorffspaceQ
ThenX"
doesnothave the propertyP1
PROOF.
IfX
eo
thene
is anorm-one-complemented subspaceofX’,
and ifX
C(Q)
thenbyKamal
[8,
Lemma3.2],
el
is anorm-one-complemented subspaceofX’,
inbothcasesone concludesby Proposition3.1that
X"
doesnot havethe propertyP.
REFERENCES
[I]
P,OVERSI, M.,
Best approximation ofbounded functions by continuous functions,J. Approx.
Theory41
(1984),
135-148[2]
LAU,
K.,
Approximation bycontinuousvectorvaluedfunctions,StudiaMath.68(1980),
291-298[3]
MACH, J., Best
simultaneous approximation of boundedfunctions withvalues incertain Banachspaces,Math.
Ann.
240(1979),
I57-164.[4]
MACH,
J., On
the existence of best simultaneousapproximation, J.
Approx.
Theory25(1979),
258-265.[5]
FERDER, M.,
On
certainsubset
ofLI[0,1]
and non-existence of best approximation in somespacesofoperators,
J.
Approx.
Theory 29(1980),
170-177.[6]
KAMAL,
A.,
On
certain diametersof boundedsets,J. Port.
Math. 51(1994),
321-333[7]
LACY,
H.E.,
TheIsometrtc
Theoryof
Classical BanachSpaces,
Springer-Verlag, 1974[8]
KAMAL,
A.,
On proximinality andsetsofoperatorsIII,
Approximation byfiniterank operators on