• No results found

2015 Home Health Medicare Payment & Regulatory Updates Part 2

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "2015 Home Health Medicare Payment & Regulatory Updates Part 2"

Copied!
21
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Karen Vance, OTR Managing Consultant BKD, LLP

kvance@bkd.com

Tuesday, February 17, 2015 | 2 – 3 p.m. Central time

2015 Home Health Medicare Payment &

Regulatory Updates – Part 2

To Receive CPE Credit

• Participate in entire webinar

• Answer polls when they are provided • If you are viewing this webinar in a group

o Complete group attendance form with

 Title & date of live webinar  Your company name

 Your printed name, signature & email address

o All group attendance sheets must be submitted to training@bkd.com

within 24 hours of live webinar

o Answer polls when they are provided

• If all eligibility requirements are met, each participant will be emailed their CPE certificates within 15 business days of live webinar

(2)

Objectives

• Articulate rationale for therapy reassessments

• Define 2015 regulatory changes for therapy reassessment timing

• Describe changes needed in home health agency operations for monitoring reassessments

• Elucidate potential changes beyond 2015 & impact on therapy utilization

• Explain changes in therapy practice needed for home health success

3 // experience access 3

RATIONALE FOR REASSESSMENT

(3)

Rationale for Therapy Reassessment Requirement

5

Rationale for Therapy Reassessment Requirement

• “Effective January 1, 2011, therapy reassessments must be

performed on or ``close to'' the 13th and 19th therapy visits and at least once every 30 days (75 FR 70372). A qualified therapist, … must functionally reassess the patient using a method which would include objective measurement.” • “We anticipated that policy regarding therapy coverage and

therapy reassessments would address payment

vulnerabilities that have led to high use and sometimes overuse of therapy services. We also discussed our expectation that this policy change would ensure more qualified therapist involvement for beneficiaries receiving high amounts of therapy.” (CMS-1611-F)

(4)

Episode % – 14 & 20 Therapy Visits

Table 35 Calendar year Episodes with at least 1 covered therapy visit Episodes with at least 14 covered therapy visits Episodes with at least 20 covered therapy visits

2010

54.1

17.2

6.0

2011

54.2

16.0

5.4

2012

55.2

15.6

5.2

2013

56.3

16.3

5.3

7

Visit % Provided by Therapy Assistants

Table 36

Calendar year % PT visits provided by a PTA % OT visits provided by an OTA

2011

23.8

14.4

2012

28.5

15.4

2013

29.2

15.4

(5)

RATIONALE FOR REASSESSMENT

2015 Rule

Federal Register Volume 79, Number 215

(November 6, 2014)

• “We note that in our CY 2012 HH PPS final rule (76 FR 68526), we recalibrated and reduced the HH PPS case-mix weights for episodes reaching 14 and 20 therapy visits, thereby diminishing the payment incentive for episodes at those therapy thresholds.

• Recent analysis of claims data from CY 2010 through CY 2013 does not show significant change in the percentage of cases reaching the 14 therapy visit and 20 therapy visit thresholds between CY 2010 and CY 2011.

• Moreover, payment increases at the 14 therapy visit and 20 therapy visit thresholds have been somewhat mitigated since the recalibration of the case-mix weights in CY 2012.”

(6)

Federal Register Volume 79, Number 215

(November 6, 2014) • Effective for episodes beginning on or after January 1, 2015

• At least every 30 days a qualified therapist (instead of an assistant) must provide the needed therapy service and functionally reassess the patient.

• Where more than one discipline of therapy is being provided, a qualified therapist from each of the

disciplines must provide the needed therapy service and functionally reassess the patient at least every 30 days.

(Emphasis added)

11

RATIONALE FOR REASSESSMENT

(7)

Monitoring Reassessment Visits

• “The reassessment will not have to be done on exactly the 30th day. For example, the reassessment could be done on the 21st day or the 28th day as clinically appropriate and deemed necessary by the therapist.”

• Reassessment clock is not measured by episode but by patient's full course of treatment, starting with therapist's first assessment/visit & continuing until patient is discharged from home health

• Each therapy discipline has its own separate clock, beginning with first therapy service (of that discipline) & clock resets with each therapist's visit/assessment/measurement/ documentation (of that discipline)

13

Federal Register Volume 79, Number 215

(November 6, 2014)

• Therapy reassessments are to be performed

o Using a method that would include objective

measurement

o In accordance with accepted professional standards of

clinical practice

o Which enables comparison of successive measurements

to determine effectiveness of therapy goals

(8)

Therapy Reassessment Documentation

15

• Does not require a full

blown evaluation to

the extent of initial

evaluation

• Does require an

‘intervention review’,

demonstrating

effectiveness of

intervention

• Does not have to be

on a particular form

• Does have to be

recognizable as a

reassessment

• Clarification added to documentation later must be

a “legal late entry”

Therapy Reassessment Elements

• Functional

o Goals & interventions must satisfy, “so what?” assuring

appropriateness to patient

• Objective

o Terms or measures used to mean same thing, by any

therapist, any time they are used

• Measurable

(9)

Objective Measures

• OASIS functional items or other commercially

available therapy outcomes instruments OR

• Tests & measurements validated in professional

literature OR

• Accepted standards of clinical practice appropriate

for condition/function being measured

17

Standards of Clinical Practice

• Include guidelines or frameworks that guide clinical

reasoning through assessment, goal setting, plans of

care & discharge planning

• Include ethical standards

• Include guidelines for supervision

• Require practice within regulatory & payment policy

of employment setting

• Assure practice & measures are appropriate for

(10)

Objective vs. Standardized Measures

• If a tool is standardized but not for home health, it is

not appropriate to be used as a standardized tool

• If a standardized tool is adapted to fit home health,

then it is no longer standardized

• There may be accepted standards of clinical practice

that may be appropriate for home health, but not

objective & not measurable

• Define measures you are currently using to make

them objective & measurable

19

Therapy Reassessment = Intervention Review

• Re-evaluate plan

• Modify plan

(11)

Clinical Reasoning OVER Rules

• Be careful to not be so concerned about measuring progress that is standardized or measurable that you find yourself documenting progress not salient to patient’s goals

• Be careful about following “rules of thumb” & prescribed documentation that you don’t catch what is important about patient’s performance

• Consider variables of performance that can be measured incrementally

• Level of assistance & increments of strength or ROM do not always describe a patient’s function

21

Documentation Standards

“The service of a physical therapist, speech-language

pathologist or occupational therapist is a skilled

therapy service if inherent complexity of the service is

such that it can be performed safely and/or effectively

only by or under the general supervision of a skilled

therapist. To be covered, the skilled services must also

be reasonable and necessary to the treatment of a

patient's illness or injury or to the restoration or

maintenance of function affected by the patient's

illness or injury.“

(Emphasis added)

(12)

RATIONALE FOR REASSESSMENT

Beyond 2015

Volume- to Value-Based Health Care

• Quality data, from patient’s perspective, is often not

meaningful & is incomplete, with little information available to compare expected functional outcomes among providers • But main culprit for current system’s ills is fee-for-service

payment system, which rewards volume over value & does nothing to promote coordination of care among providers • First step in correcting system is a transition from

(13)

Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPac)

“The Secretary should revise the home health

case-mix system to rely on patient

characteristics to set payment for therapy and

nontherapy services and should no longer use

the number of therapy visits as a payment

factor.”

25

Value-Based Health Care

Healthcare Financial Management Association (HFMA). (2011). Value in health care: current state and future directions. Retrieved from www.hfma.org

(14)

Volume-Based Practices

• 13

th

& 19

th

therapy reassessments

• Documentation justifying visits to payor

• Documenting progress & need

• Using same visit frequency & duration

• Defending volume of services to justify associated

payment

27

Value-Based Practices

• Selecting services based on contribution that service

will make toward desirable & sustainable outcomes

• Justification, not to the payor, but to the agency, that

services are worth providing

• Value-based practices require different skills &

knowledge (competencies) than volume-based

practices

(15)

RATIONALE FOR REASSESSMENT

Therapy Skill Set

Most Common Primary Home Health Diagnosis,

Medicare Beneficiaries

(2010)

Diagnosis ICD-9-CM Code

% total served with this HH 1o diagnosis Diabetes 250 10.3 Essential hypertension 401 9.3 Heart failure 428 7.4 Chronic ulcer of skin 707 4.3 Osteoarthrosis related dx 715 3.7 Cardiac dysrhythmias 427 2.6 Total 37.6

(16)

Management of Chronic Conditions

• “As much as 90% of the management of a chronic

condition must be performed, not by health care providers, but by the person who has the condition.”

California Healthcare Foundation, 2008

• “Patients with chronic conditions self-manage their illness. This fact is inescapable. Each day, patients decide what they are going to eat, whether they will exercise, and to what extent they will consume prescribed medication.”

Bodenhemer, Lorig, Holman & Grumbach, 2002

31

Don’t Confuse . . .

Knowledge

Behavior

Verbalize Understanding

Implementation

(17)

Outcomes

• What will result of therapy intervention be?

• Will it be sustainable?

o Capable of being sustained

o Resources needed to sustain

• Will it matter?

• A shift in metrics from possible to practical

o Are resources required to achieve result worth the result

achieved?

o Are resources required to sustain result reasonable?

33

Management of Chronic Conditions

• Medications (obtain, administer as directed, refill) • Self monitoring (BP, glucose, skin)

• Other treatments (oxygen, nebulizer, insulin) • Physical activity (exercise, pacing)

• Diet (carbs/glycemic index, sodium, potassium) • Attend & participate in health care encounters

(18)

Outcome Indicators

35

Outcomes Measures State Nat’l How often patients got better at walking or moving around. 63% 63% How often patients got better at getting in and out of bed. 61% 58% How often patients got better at bathing. 72% 68% How often patients had less pain when moving around 66% 68% How often patients breathing improved. 70% 65% How often patients’ wounds improved or healed after an operation. 90% 89% How often patients got better at taking their drugs correctly by mouth. 53% 52%

How often patients receiving home health care needed any urgent, unplanned

care in the hospital emergency room – without being admitted to the hospital 14% 12% How often home health patients had to be admitted to the hospital 14% 16%

Satisfying All Stakeholders

• Effective o Good outcomes • Productive o Cost efficient • Compliant o Good documenting • Effective o Reduce hospitalization • Efficient o Reduced costs • Compliant o With

Agency Payor/Regulators Patient/ Support System • Effective o Feel better o Manage condition o Stay at home

(19)

Questions?

Thank You!

(20)

Continuing Professional Education (CPE) Credits

BKD,LLPis registered with the National Association of State Boards of Accountancy (NASBA) as a sponsor of continuing professional education on the National Registry of CPE Sponsors. State boards of accountancy have final authority on the acceptance of individual courses for CPE credit. Complaints regarding registered sponsors may be submitted to the National Registry of CPE Sponsors through its website: www.learningmarket.org.

The information in BKD webinars is presented by BKD professionals, but applying specific information to your situation requires careful consideration of facts & circumstances. Consult your BKD advisor before acting on any

matters covered in these webinars.

39

CPE Credit

• CPE credit may be awarded upon verification of participant attendance

• For questions, concerns or comments regarding CPE credit, please email the BKD Learning & Development Department

(21)

References

Related documents

There is no reference sign on a function call - only on function definitions..  A IM OF THE E XPERIMENT :  Write a program that will accept an array of integers as input, and output

Thus, Table IV “Impact of Payment Rate and Policy Changes to LTCH PPS Payments for Standard Payment Rate Cases for FY 2016” in the final rule shows the detail impact by

[r]

This study characterized uterine, fecal, bedding, and airborne dust microbiota from postpartum dairy cows and their environment during summer and winter.. The results clarify

At Burlington County College, these programs are generally one year in duration and include courses specifically related to career requirements as well as general education

2.12 Results for the reconstructed Higgs boson mass distribution using leading-order matrix elements for top quark pair production, and the production of W ± and Z 0 bosons

This portion of the test provides for the admissibility of a deferred tax asset to the extent that deductible temporary differences reversing in the succeeding years, determined

The HH PPS adjusts Medicare payment based on whether one of three therapy thresholds (6, 14 or 20 visits) is met. As a result of these multiple thresholds, meeting a threshold