• No results found

The Process of Communication in Face to Face vs Computerized Conferences; A Controlled Experiment Using Bales Interaction Process Analysis

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "The Process of Communication in Face to Face vs Computerized Conferences; A Controlled Experiment Using Bales Interaction Process Analysis"

Copied!
6
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

Loading

Figure

figure one). The factors were mode of communication (face-to-face vs. camputerlzed conference) and problem type (human relations vs
Table Val~es Eor F i and 12 a-e=4.75
Table Values for F 1 and 12 df=4.75

References

Related documents

Subsequently, using an acute KD whole blood transcriptome data set, eQTL analysis of the common SNVs suggested decreased transcript levels of IL6 and higher ESR at diagnosis

Fillet steak rolled in black pepper, served with a green peppercorn sauce, herbed potato wedges and onion rings Pytt i Panna / swedish hash 105:-. Pytt i panna med rödbetor,

   About  80  people   In  the  village  have  received  vaccinaAons  against   diphtheria,  tetanus

In a more recent study Pickhardt et al (2005) compared the accuracy of linear polyp measurement using 2-D m ultiplanar reform atted (MPR) and 3-D endolummal views

A lignment E xecution I mplementation O ptimization U tilization.. Best Practices Next Practices TIME EFF OR T • Predictable • Inevitable Proactive Reactive

system programming all internal, private or DID CO line calls to your station. Your station does not ring when called. Your station must be assigned with the

For this, OpenFPM provides an encapsulated serialization/de-serialization sub-system that is used by each processor locally in order to serialize the local pieces of a distributed