• No results found

Personalizing Grammatical Error Correction: Adaptation to Proficiency Level and L1

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Personalizing Grammatical Error Correction: Adaptation to Proficiency Level and L1"

Copied!
7
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

Loading

Figure

Figure 1: Corpus Distributions for CEFR Level, L1 and L1-Level.
Table 1: Adaptation to Proficiency Level in F0.5
Table 2: Top: Adaptation to L1 Only. Bottom: Adaptation to Level and L1. Eval metric: F0.5
Table 4: L1-Level breakdown by error type in relative improvements in F0.5 over the “Random” baseline.

References

Related documents

To complement previous N 13 C records of planktic and benthic foraminifera at this location, late Neogene records of CaCO 3 mass accumulation rate (MAR), Ca/Ti, Ba/Ti, Al/Ti, and

Chapter 4: The Effect of Render Style on Perception of Virtual Characters.. describes a series of experiments which use one character rendered in different

However, increasing the frequency to approximately 10 Hz and above, decreased significantly the modulation of the diffracted signal, as expected because of the relatively long

The first part of this section introduces some categorical concepts that will be used later in the paper, while the second part gives an outline of the hidden algebraic approach

In our series of 45 patients, 62.2% of patients were diagnosed as having pulmonary tuberculosis, followed by bacterial infection in 20% cases and Pneumocystis jiroveci

Mummichogs ( Fundulus heteroclitus ) acclimated to hypersaline [2× seawater (2SW), 64 ‰ ] for 30 days developed invasive projections of accessory cells with an increased area of

Because of this dimorphism in life history, we predicted that selection in males would enhance their ability to sustain high levels of aerobic metabolism (compared with females)

The picture that is fast emerging is that time of day is critical in terms of the type of immune response generated by an organism. The type of immune response can be