organic papers
o678
Garcia-Sanchezet al. C14H10Cl4 doi:10.1107/S1600536805004472 Acta Cryst.(2005). E61, o678–o680
Acta Crystallographica Section E Structure Reports Online
ISSN 1600-5368
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloro-1,2-diphenylethane
Adriana Garcia-Sanchez,a Itzia I. Padilla-Martı´nez,a Francisco J. Martı´nez-Martı´nez,b Herbert Ho¨pflcand
Efre´n V. Garcı´a-Ba´eza*
aUnidad Profesional Interdisciplinaria de
Biotecnologı´a, Instituto Polite´cnico Nacional, Avenida Acueducto s/n, Barrio La Laguna Ticoma´n, Me´xico, DF 07340, Mexico, b
Departamento de Quı´mica, Universidad Auto´noma de Colima, Mexico, andcCentro de Investigacio´nes Quı´micas, Universidad Auto´noma del Estado de Morelos, Cuernava Morelos, Mexico
Correspondence e-mail: vgarcia@acei.upibi.ipn.mx
Key indicators
Single-crystal X-ray study
T= 100 K
Mean(C–C) = 0.02 A˚
Rfactor = 0.026
wRfactor = 0.067
Data-to-parameter ratio = 17.8
For details of how these key indicators were automatically derived from the article, see http://journals.iucr.org/e.
#2005 International Union of Crystallography Printed in Great Britain – all rights reserved
The title compound, C14H10Cl4, possesses Ci symmetry and crystallizes with one half-molecule in the asymmetric unit. The two phenyl rings are antiperiplanar and inclined to one another by 180by symmetry. The central C—C bond distance
and the Cl—C—Cl bond angle [1.5887 (18) A˚ and 106.02 (7),
respectively] are significantly different from ideal sp3values. In the crystal, a supramolecular structure is achieved by soft parallel-displaced–stacking and C—H intermolecular interactions.
Comment
Halogenated hydrocarbons are known for their toxic effects, and some of these compounds are suspected of having human carcinogenic activity (Corniaet al., 1993). The title compound, (I), and its derivatives constitute an important class of halo-genated hydrocarbons whose internal rotation processes and conformational preferences have been studied by NMR and X-ray methods (Antolini et al., 1995). In this context the crystal structure of (I) is reported here.
The molecular conformation and dimensions of (I), illu-strated in Fig. 1, are very similar to those reported for several
p-substituted diaryl derivatives of 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane (Antoliniet al., 1994). Selected interatomic distances and bond and torsion angles are listed in Table 1.
The asymmetric unit of (I) contains one half-molecule, with the other half generated by a center of inversion, which lies at the midpoint of the C1—C1ibond [symmetry code: (i)x+ 1,
y,z+ 1]. Thereby, perfect staggering around the C1—C1i bond is a consequence, with the aromatic rings in an anti-periplanar position [C2—C1—C1i—C2i = 180]. The same molecular conformation and symmetry requirements (1) were observed in other 4,4-(1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane-1,2-di-yl)dichlorobenzenes (Hovmo¨ller et al., 1978; Antolini et al, 1994). Good agreement of the corresponding values of bond
distances and angles with compound (I) is found. Never-theless, some of these geometric parameters are significantly different from those reported for many DDT-type derivatives of known structures and from mean values retrieved from the Cambridge Structural Database (Version of April 2004; Allen, 2002).
The C1—C1idistance of 1.5887 (18) A˚ is significantly longer than the mean value of 1.513 A˚ for a C—C single bond (Allen
et al., 1987). Such bond lengthening is accompanied by a substantial decrease of the bond angle [Cl1—C1—Cl2 = 106.02 (7)] in comparison with the idealsp3
angle of 109.5 A˚ . In contrast, the Cl1—C1 and Cl2—C1 bond distances, of 1.7969 (13) and 1.7882 (14) A˚ , respectively, are similar to the value of 1.792 A˚ found in DDT-type derivatives.
The supramolecular structure of (I), shown in Fig. 2, is achieved by parallel displaced -stacking interactions [symmetry code:x,y, 1z] between the aromatic rings, with interplanar and intercentroid distances of 3.374 and 3.8916 (10) A˚ , respectively (Singh & Thornton, 1990). T-shaped (Umezawa et al., 1998) C4—H4 Phiii [symmetry code: (iii) x, 1
2y,
1
2+z] intermolecular interactions of
2.8267 A˚ [C4 Ph = 3.6971 (16) A˚ and C4—H4 Ph = 152.74] also contribute to the crystal packing.
Experimental
,,-Trichlorotoluene (1.02 ml, 7.15 mmol) and triethylamine (3.8 ml, 27.24 mmol) were heated at 393 K in a sealed ampoule for 24 h. The resulting mixture was dissolved in CHCl3 (50 ml) and
extracted with three portions of distilled water (20 ml). After drying with Na2SO4and concentrating, the organic phase was
chromato-graphed on silica gel to obtain 0.914 g (80% yield) of (I) as a white solid. Crystals suitable for X-ray analysis were obtained by crystal-lization from a chloroform solution.1H NMR (CDCl
3):7.44 (br, 2H,
Hp), 7.35 (t, 2H, Hm), 7.21 (br, 2H, Ho); 13
C NMR (CDCl3):136.4
(Ci), 131.0 (Cp), 130.0 (Cm), 126.87 (Co), 96.8 (CCl2).
Crystal data
C14H10Cl4 Mr= 320.02 Monoclinic,P21=c a= 8.5925 (10) A˚
b= 10.6129 (13) A˚
c= 7.7558 (9) A˚ = 114.315 (2)
V= 644.52 (13) A˚3
Z= 2
Dx= 1.649 Mg m
3
MoKradiation Cell parameters from 600
reflections = 20–25
= 0.89 mm1 T= 100 (2) K Block, colorless 0.520.490.42 mm
Data collection
Bruker SMART area-detector diffractometer
’and!scans
6982 measured reflections 1461 independent reflections 1451 reflections withI> 2(I)
Rint= 0.021
max= 27.6 h=10!10
k=13!13
l=10!10
Refinement
Refinement onF2 R[F2> 2(F2)] = 0.026 wR(F2) = 0.067 S= 1.12 1461 reflections 82 parameters
H-atom parameters constrained
w= 1/[2(F
o2) + (0.0354P)2
+ 0.3344P]
whereP= (Fo2+ 2Fc2)/3
(/)max= 0.001 max= 0.41 e A˚
3 min=0.23 e A˚ 3
Table 1
Selected geometric parameters (A˚ ,).
Cl1—C1 1.7969 (13)
Cl2—C1 1.7882 (14)
C1—C2 1.523 (2)
C1—C1i
1.5887 (18)
Cl1—C1—Cl2 106.02 (7)
Cl1—C1—C2 110.43 (9)
Cl1—C1—C1i
107.00 (9)
Cl2—C1—C2 110.37 (9)
Cl2—C1—C1i 107.69 (9)
Symmetry code: (i)xþ1;y;zþ1.
All the H atoms could be located in difference Fourier maps, and were refined as riding atoms, with C—H = 0.95 A˚ and Uiso(H) =
1.2Ueq(C).
Data collection:SMART(Bruker, 2000); cell refinement:SMART; data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 2000); program(s) used to solve
organic papers
Acta Cryst.(2005). E61, o678–o680 Garcia-Sanchezet al. C
[image:2.610.96.224.72.314.2]14H10Cl4
o679
Figure 2
The crystal packing of compound (I). Parallel displaced–stacking and C4—H4 iii
intermolecular interactions are shown as dotted lines. [Symmetry codes: (ii)x,y, 1z; (iii)x,1
2y, 1 2+z.]
Figure 1
The molecular structure of compound (I), showing displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 30% probability level [Symmetry code: (a)
[image:2.610.316.564.72.190.2]structure: SHELXS97(Sheldrick, 1997); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics:
SHELXTL (Bruker, 2000); software used to prepare material for publication:SHELXL97andWinGX2003(Farrugia, 1999).
This work was supported by CGPI–IPN (Coordinacio´n General de Posgrado e Investigacio´n del Instituto Polite´cnico Nacional).
References
Allen, F. H. (2002).Acta Cryst.B58, 380–388.
Allen, F. A., Kennard, O. J., Watson, D. G., Brammer, L., Orpen, G. & Taylor, R. (1987).J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans.2, pp. S1–19.
Antolini, L., Folli, U., Iarossi, D., Mucci, A., Sbardellati, S. & Taddei, F. (1995).
J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans.2, pp. 1007–1015.
Antolini, L., Folli, U., Mucci, A., Sbardellati, S. & Taddei, F. (1994).J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans.2, pp. 1107–1114.
Bruker (2000).SMART,SAINTandSHELXTL. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Winsconsin, USA.
Cornia, A., Folli, U., Sbardellati, S. & Taddei, F. (1993).J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans.2, pp. 1847–1853.
Farrugia, L. J. (1999).J. Appl. Cryst.32, 837–838.
Hovmo¨ller, S., Smith, G. & Kennard, C. H. L. (1978). Acta Cryst.B34, 3016–3021.
Sheldrick, G. M. (1997). SHELXS97 and SHELXL97. University of Go¨ttingen, Germany.
Singh, J. & Thornton, J. M. (1990).J. Mol. Biol.211, 595–615.
Umezawa, Y., Tsuboyama, S., Honda, K., Uzawa, J. & Nishio, M. (1998).Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn,71, 1207–1213.
organic papers
o680
Garcia-Sanchezet al. Csupporting information
sup-1
Acta Cryst. (2005). E61, o678–o680
supporting information
Acta Cryst. (2005). E61, o678–o680 [https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536805004472]
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloro-1,2-diphenylethane
Adriana Garcia-Sanchez, Itzia I. Padilla-Mart
í
nez, Francisco J. Mart
í
nez-Mart
í
nez, Herbert
H
ö
pfl and Efr
é
n V. Garc
í
a-B
á
ez
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloro-1,2-diphenylethane
Crystal data
C14H10Cl4
Mr = 320.02 Monoclinic, P21/c
Hall symbol: -P 2ybc a = 8.5925 (10) Å b = 10.6129 (13) Å c = 7.7558 (9) Å β = 114.315 (2)° V = 644.52 (13) Å3
Z = 2
F(000) = 324 Dx = 1.649 Mg m−3
Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å Cell parameters from 600 reflections θ = 20–25°
µ = 0.89 mm−1
T = 100 K Block, colorless 0.52 × 0.49 × 0.42 mm
Data collection
Bruker SMART area-detector diffractometer
Graphite monochromator φ and ω scans
6982 measured reflections 1461 independent reflections
1451 reflections with I > 2σ(I) Rint = 0.021
θmax = 27.6°, θmin = 2.6°
h = −10→10 k = −13→13 l = −10→10
Refinement
Refinement on F2
Least-squares matrix: full R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.026
wR(F2) = 0.067
S = 1.12 1461 reflections 82 parameters 0 restraints
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
H-atom parameters constrained w = 1/[σ2(F
o2) + (0.0354P)2 + 0.3344P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
Δρmax = 0.41 e Å−3
Δρmin = −0.23 e Å−3
Special details
Geometry. Bond distances, angles etc. have been calculated using the rounded fractional coordinates. All e.s.d.'s are estimated from the variances of the (full) variance-covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account in the estimation of distances, angles and torsion angles
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2,
conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used
only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2
supporting information
sup-2
Acta Cryst. (2005). E61, o678–o680
Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)
x y z Uiso*/Ueq
Cl1 0.46504 (4) 0.00002 (3) 0.20693 (4) 0.0158 (1) Cl2 0.57707 (4) 0.19318 (3) 0.48969 (4) 0.0160 (1) C1 0.45328 (16) 0.05183 (12) 0.42181 (17) 0.0128 (3) C2 0.26869 (16) 0.07810 (12) 0.38812 (18) 0.0140 (3) C3 0.22964 (18) 0.17374 (13) 0.48755 (19) 0.0167 (3) C4 0.06136 (18) 0.19511 (13) 0.4596 (2) 0.0191 (4) C5 −0.06910 (17) 0.12216 (14) 0.3324 (2) 0.0194 (4) C6 −0.03112 (17) 0.02648 (14) 0.2344 (2) 0.0179 (4) C7 0.13693 (18) 0.00440 (12) 0.2613 (2) 0.0160 (4)
H3 0.31844 0.22437 0.57459 0.0201*
H4 0.03568 0.26006 0.52813 0.0229*
H5 −0.18417 0.13766 0.31249 0.0233*
H6 −0.12033 −0.02432 0.14832 0.0215*
H7 0.16197 −0.06108 0.19317 0.0192*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)
U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
Cl1 0.0167 (2) 0.0189 (2) 0.0124 (2) 0.0015 (1) 0.0066 (1) −0.0004 (1) Cl2 0.0154 (2) 0.0118 (2) 0.0200 (2) −0.0018 (1) 0.0066 (1) 0.0000 (1) C1 0.0147 (6) 0.0119 (6) 0.0117 (6) −0.0010 (5) 0.0053 (5) −0.0012 (4) C2 0.0133 (6) 0.0141 (6) 0.0139 (6) 0.0016 (5) 0.0049 (5) 0.0028 (5) C3 0.0173 (6) 0.0153 (6) 0.0168 (6) 0.0017 (5) 0.0064 (5) 0.0006 (5) C4 0.0201 (7) 0.0191 (7) 0.0203 (7) 0.0058 (5) 0.0105 (5) 0.0031 (5) C5 0.0151 (6) 0.0239 (7) 0.0202 (7) 0.0049 (5) 0.0083 (5) 0.0086 (5) C6 0.0139 (7) 0.0221 (7) 0.0149 (6) −0.0012 (5) 0.0031 (5) 0.0039 (5) C7 0.0167 (7) 0.0161 (6) 0.0139 (6) 0.0005 (5) 0.0051 (5) 0.0005 (4)
Geometric parameters (Å, º)
Cl1—C1 1.7969 (13) C5—C6 1.385 (2)
Cl2—C1 1.7882 (14) C6—C7 1.391 (2)
C1—C2 1.523 (2) C3—H3 0.95
C1—C1i 1.5887 (18) C4—H4 0.95
C2—C3 1.397 (2) C5—H5 0.95
C2—C7 1.394 (2) C6—H6 0.95
C3—C4 1.390 (2) C7—H7 0.95
C4—C5 1.385 (2)
Cl1···Cl1ii 3.5003 (6) C6···C4viii 3.426 (2)
Cl1···Cl2i 3.2516 (6) C6···C5viii 3.484 (2)
Cl1···Cl2iii 3.5506 (6) C6···C7vi 3.583 (2)
Cl1···C3i 3.2831 (15) C7···C6vi 3.583 (2)
Cl2···C7i 3.2027 (15) C7···Cl2i 3.2027 (15)
supporting information
sup-3
Acta Cryst. (2005). E61, o678–o680
Cl2···Cl1i 3.2516 (6) C6···H7vi 3.0538
Cl1···H5v 3.1396 C7···H4ix 2.9967
Cl1···H7 2.6428 H3···Cl2 2.5859
Cl1···H3i 3.0672 H3···Cl1i 3.0672
Cl1···H6vi 3.1161 H4···C6x 2.9626
Cl2···H3 2.5859 H4···C7x 2.9967
Cl2···H5v 2.9609 H5···Cl1xi 3.1396
Cl2···H7i 2.9157 H5···Cl2xi 2.9609
Cl2···H5vii 3.0773 H5···Cl2xii 3.0773
C3···Cl1i 3.2831 (15) H6···Cl1vi 3.1161
C4···C6viii 3.426 (2) H7···Cl1 2.6428
C5···C5viii 3.514 (2) H7···Cl2i 2.9157
C5···C6viii 3.484 (2) H7···C6vi 3.0538
Cl1—C1—Cl2 106.02 (7) C5—C6—C7 120.37 (14)
Cl1—C1—C2 110.43 (9) C2—C7—C6 120.16 (13)
Cl1—C1—C1i 107.00 (9) C2—C3—H3 119.88
Cl2—C1—C2 110.37 (9) C4—C3—H3 119.88
Cl2—C1—C1i 107.69 (9) C3—C4—H4 119.83
C1i—C1—C2 114.89 (11) C5—C4—H4 119.84
C1—C2—C3 120.54 (12) C4—C5—H5 120.12
C1—C2—C7 120.27 (12) C6—C5—H5 120.14
C3—C2—C7 119.16 (14) C5—C6—H6 119.82
C2—C3—C4 120.24 (13) C7—C6—H6 119.81
C3—C4—C5 120.32 (13) C2—C7—H7 119.92
C4—C5—C6 119.74 (15) C6—C7—H7 119.92
Cl1—C1—C2—C3 −146.78 (11) C2—C1—C1i—Cl1i −57.02 (12)
Cl1—C1—C2—C7 35.06 (15) C2—C1—C1i—Cl2i 56.59 (12)
Cl2—C1—C2—C3 −29.87 (15) C2—C1—C1i—C2i 180.00 (11)
Cl2—C1—C2—C7 151.96 (11) C1—C2—C3—C4 −178.38 (12) C1i—C1—C2—C3 92.10 (15) C7—C2—C3—C4 −0.2 (2)
C1i—C1—C2—C7 −86.07 (15) C1—C2—C7—C6 178.34 (12)
Cl1—C1—C1i—Cl1i −180.00 (8) C3—C2—C7—C6 0.1 (2)
Cl1—C1—C1i—Cl2i −66.40 (10) C2—C3—C4—C5 −0.3 (2)
Cl1—C1—C1i—C2i 57.02 (12) C3—C4—C5—C6 0.8 (2)
Cl2—C1—C1i—Cl1i 66.40 (10) C4—C5—C6—C7 −0.8 (2)
Cl2—C1—C1i—Cl2i 179.98 (10) C5—C6—C7—C2 0.4 (2)
Cl2—C1—C1i—C2i −56.59 (12)
Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1, −y, −z+1; (ii) −x+1, −y, −z; (iii) −x+1, y−1/2, −z+1/2; (iv) −x+1, y+1/2, −z+1/2; (v) x+1, y, z; (vi) −x, −y, −z; (vii) x+1, −y+1/2, z+1/2; (viii) −x, −y, −z+1; (ix) x, −y+1/2, z−1/2; (x) x, −y+1/2, z+1/2; (xi) x−1, y, z; (xii) x−1, −y+1/2, z−1/2.
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º)
D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
C3—H3···Cl2 0.95 2.59 2.9856 (17) 106