• No results found

Milwaukee Public Schools Retiree Healthcare and Life Insurance Programs

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Milwaukee Public Schools Retiree Healthcare and Life Insurance Programs"

Copied!
17
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Milwaukee Public Schools Retiree Healthcare and 

Life Insurance Programs

GASB Statement No. 45 Actuarial Valuation as of July 1, 2015 December 15, 2016

Alex Rivera, F.S.A.

(ATTACHMENT 1) REPORT AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON THE ACTUARIAL VALUATION OF THE DISTRICT'S OBLIGATION FOR OTHER POST-EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS (OPEB) AS OF

JULY 1, 2015

(2)

Agenda – GASB 45 Valuation

 Background

 Medicare Advantage Design Impact

 Definitions

 Key Valuation Results

 Projections

 Next Steps and Challenges

 Disclosures

(3)

Background

 MPS provides retiree healthcare and life insurance  benefits, which requires:

Recognizing an accrual liability on the District’s balance  sheet

Disclosing unfunded actuarial liabilities off the District’s  balance sheet

 New OPEB accounting standards require 

recognizing the unfunded liability on the District’s  balance sheet:

GASB Statement No. 75, plan sponsor accounting, effective  for the fiscal year end June 30, 2018

GASB Statement No. 74, plan accounting, effective for the 

plan year end June 30, 2017

(4)

Background

Key changes made in 2011

Changed vendor which improved network discounts

Increased member’s co‐pays, deductibles, coinsurance  percentage and out‐of‐pocket limits

Increased retirement eligibility to age 60 with 20 years of service

Eliminated District paid implicit subsidy and reduced District  paid explicit subsidy

Implicit subsidy is difference between average cost of retiree only pool  and active only pool

The explicit subsidy only reduces at Medicare eligibility for members  retiring on or after July 1, 2013

The implicit subsidy was only eliminated for self pay retirees. All other  retirees pay the blended rates.

The plan was closed to new hires and rehires as of July 1, 2013

Certain retirees were grandfathered

Key changes in 2014 include adoption of a Medicare 

Advantage program, effective in January of 2015

(5)

Medicare Advantage Design Impact

Medicare Advantage

The district adopted Medicare Advantage (MA) programs effective in  2015

The MA programs replaced the EPO and PPO programs for Medicare  eligible retirees

The MA programs are financed on a fully insured basis

Based on 2015 data, the MA average costs were about 35% lower than  the EPO and PPO average costs for Medicare eligible members

GASB Statement No. 45 Estimated Savings 

Based on the July 1, 2013 valuation, MA design was estimated to reduce  the actuarial accrued liability by approximately 18% or $250 million

Favorable experience resulted in MA premiums increasing at a rate  lower than expected in our previous valuation (about 8% gain on  premium increase) 

Because of the uncertainty of the MA programs, especially with respect  to the federal prescription drug subsidies, our valuation assumes the  MA savings will wear‐away over an 8 to 10 year period.

(6)

Unfunded Actuarial  Liability

Balance Sheet  Liability

Actuarial liability is the value of  retiree healthcare and life 

insurance benefits that the  District owes to current and  future retirees for benefit  service earned to date.

The difference between the  actuarial liability and assets, if  any,  is disclosed off the balance  sheet.

The balance sheet liability is  the cumulative difference  between the actuarially 

determined cost  applicable to  the fiscal year (Annual OPEB  Cost or Expense) and the actual  pay‐as‐you‐go contributions. 

The Annual OPEB Cost 

represents the annual amount  needed to finance:  the existing  unfunded actuarial liability  over a fixed period, such as 30  years, plus the value of benefits  earned during the year.

There are two ways to evaluate the District’s TOTAL retiree benefit obligation:

Definitions

(7)

Key Valuation Results

Valuation Date July 1, 2015

Before Medicare Advantage Program

After Medicare Advantage Program

Actuarial Liability $1,403.0 $1,153.0 $997.5

Normal Cost for FY $8.1 $6.2 $4.5

GASB No. 45 FY Expense $93.5 $76.2 $62.3

(% of Payroll) 21.7% 17.7% 16.5%

FY Employer Contribution $67.3 $57.1 $53.1

(% of Payroll) 15.6% 13.2% 14.1%

Payroll $431.2 $431.2 $376.4

Number of Active Members 8,600 8,600 7,184

Number of Retirees and Surviving Spouses 7,222 7,222 6,978

Discount Rate 4.55% 4.55% 4.55%

Ultimate Trend 4.50% 4.50% 4.50%

Retiree Healthcare and Life Insurance Programs GASB 45 Valuation Results

$ in Millions

July 1, 2013

(8)

Key Valuation Results

($ in Millions)

Actuarial Liability as of July 1, 2013 $ 1,153.0 Expected Liability as of July 1, 2015 $ 1,154.0 Increase/(Decrease) Due To:

Healthcare Experience and Assumption Changesa $ (159.5) Changes in Demographic Assumptions $ -

Demographic Experience $ 3.0

Actuarial Liability as of July 1, 2015 $ 997.5

Actuarial Liability Gain/Loss

aFavorable experience including actual claims and premiums lower than projected in our previous valuation

(9)

Key Valuation Results

$ in Millions

Fiscal Year End June 30, 2014 June 30, 2015 June 30, 2016

Balance Sheet Liability (boy) $ 539.2 $ 530.6 $ 507.0 Annual OPEB Costs 93.5 75.3 62.3 Employer Contribution (98.9)(102.1) (53.1) Balance Sheet Liability (eoy) $ 530.6 $ 507.0 $ 516.2

Balance Sheet Liability

(10)

Projections 

Observations

Actuarial liabilities projected to increase from $997.5 million in 2015 to 

$1,324.9 million in 2024

Expense projected to increase from $62.4 million in FYE 2016 to $82.8  million in FYE 2025

Expected Employer contributions, with 20% margin, projected to  increase from $60.6 million in FYE 2016 to $75.0 million in FYE 2025

Actual Employer contributions (including prefunding amount) for FYE  2016 were $53.1 million

Balance sheet liability projected to increase from $516.2 million at FYE  2016 to $566.2 million at FYE 2025

Projected liabilities and costs have decreased when compared to the  last valuation at July 1, 2013

Balance sheet liability under new accounting rules will be based on  the unfunded actuarial liability using a blended discount rate, 

which could be lower, to determine actuarial liabilities

(11)

Projections

997.5

1071.2

1324.9

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024

($ in Millions)

Valuation Year

Milwaukee Public Schools

Projected GASB Statement No. 45 Actuarial Liability as of 7/1/2015 at  4.55%

(12)

Projections

62.4

67.5

82.8

0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024

($ in Millions)

Valuation Year

Milwaukee Public Schools

Projected GASB Statement No. 45 Annual OPEB Cost as of FYE 6/30/16

(13)

Projections

53.1

64.6

75.0

0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024

($ in Millions)

Valuation Year

Milwaukee Public Schools

Projected GASB Statement No. 45 Expected Employer Contributions as  of FYE 6/30/2016

(14)

Projections

516.2 524.1

566.2

0 100 200 300 400 500 600

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024

($ in Millions)

Valuation Year

Milwaukee Public Schools

Projected GASB Statement No. 45 Balance Sheet Liability as of  7/1/2015 at 4.55%

(15)

Next Steps and Challenges

Despite the plan design changes made, we recommend  monitoring and evaluating the future growth in the OPEB  actuarial liability and balance sheet liability

Challenges and cost drivers faced by MPS may include:

The rate of medical inflation – greater than the        consumer price index

Longevity – retirees living longer

Utilization – members using more healthcare services

Growth of retiree population – the ratio of actives to retirees is  approaching 1:1

Medicare – potential for increased cost shifting to the MPS  retiree health plan

New accounting standards including how to support the 

blended discount rate

(16)

Disclosures

Circular 230 Notice:  Pursuant to regulations issued by the IRS, to the extent  this presentation concerns tax matters, it is not intended or written to be  used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding tax‐related  penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) marketing or 

recommending to another party any tax‐related matter addressed within. 

Each taxpayer should seek advice based on the individual’s circumstances  from an independent tax advisor.

This presentation shall not be construed to provide tax advice, legal advice  or investment advice. 

The actuaries submitting this presentation (Alex Rivera and Lance Weiss)  are Members of the American Academy of Actuaries and meet the 

Qualification Standards of the American Academy of Actuaries to render  the actuarial opinion contained herein.

The primary purpose of the actuarial valuation is to measure the financial  position of Milwaukee Public Schools Retiree Healthcare and Life Insurance  Programs.

(17)

Disclosures

The valuation results summarized in this report involve actuarial 

calculations that require assumptions about future events.  The major  actuarial assumptions used in this analysis were provided by and are the  responsibility of Milwaukee Public Schools.  We are unable to judge the  reasonableness of some of these assumptions without performing a 

substantial amount of additional work beyond the scope of the assignment.

Future actuarial measurements may differ significantly from the current  measurements presented in this report due to such factors as the following: 

plan experience differing from that anticipated by the economic or  demographic assumptions; changes in economic or demographic  assumptions; and changes in plan provisions or applicable law.  

This is one of multiple documents comprising the actuarial report for the  MPS actuarial valuation.  Additional information regarding actuarial  assumptions and methods, and important additional disclosures are  provided in the full actuarial valuation report as of July 1, 2015.

If you need additional information to make an informed decision about the  contents of this presentation, or if anything appears to be missing or 

References

Related documents

in other words, the actuarial value (using that definition) represents the portion of the total cost of covered benefits that are paid by a health insurance plan.. The Senate

After you defeat her, continue south to pick up the item ball containing the Escape Rope, and return just north of the Lass to t ake the path continuing East.. Here, battle the

Experiments and investigations to assess the influence of AWJM process parameters on surface roughness and kerf taper ratio of aramid fibre reinforced plastics AFRP composite is

Más allá de esa perspectiva innovadora en el contenido determinante de la integración latinoamericana, podemos incluir otro aspecto que la diferencia de los modelos anteriores:

If you transferred from the University/Medical Center to the Health System after July 1, 2002, refer to the Retirement Planning Guide for additional eligibility

• Funding indicators, including actuarial value of assets (AVA), market value of assets (MVA), actuarial accrued liability (AAL), unfunded actuarial accrued liability (UAAL), GASB

If Milwaukee Public Schools continues to fund retire healthcare benefits predominantly on a pay-as- you-go basis, including contributing 105 percent of actual retiree

Try again in a strong foundation donation request, flyers and in their request approval to fulfill all requests in for the near future that all the areas.. Together to the donation