• No results found

college_school_overall_excel_report_fall 2008

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "college_school_overall_excel_report_fall 2008"

Copied!
9
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

# % # % # % # % # %

Strongly Agree 3724 76.2% 1116 76.5% 1729 78.2% 363 66.4% 6932 76.2%

Somewhat Agree 807 16.5% 251 17.2% 348 15.7% 111 20.3% 1517 16.7%

Neutral 251 5.1% 53 3.6% 79 3.6% 42 7.7% 425 4.7%

Somewhat Disagree 60 1.2% 22 1.5% 32 1.4% 14 2.6% 128 1.4%

Strongly Disagree 45 0.9% 17 1.2% 22 1.0% 17 3.1% 101 1.1%

Omits/Multi-Marked*

Mean

Strongly Agree 3321 70.4% 1026 72.9% 1598 73.3% 352 66.8% 6297 71.3%

Somewhat Agree 841 17.8% 261 18.5% 392 18.0% 103 19.5% 1597 18.1%

Neutral 384 8.1% 63 4.5% 108 5.0% 31 5.9% 586 6.6%

Somewhat Disagree 98 2.1% 37 2.6% 51 2.3% 19 3.6% 205 2.3%

Strongly Disagree 72 1.5% 21 1.5% 32 1.5% 22 4.2% 147 1.7%

Omits/Multi-Marked*

Mean

Strongly Agree 3456 73.3% 1039 74.1% 1640 75.2% 355 67.6% 6490 73.5%

Somewhat Agree 776 16.5% 239 17.0% 352 16.1% 106 20.2% 1473 16.7%

Neutral 353 7.5% 78 5.6% 119 5.5% 32 6.1% 582 6.6%

Somewhat Disagree 85 1.8% 21 1.5% 45 2.1% 22 4.2% 173 2.0%

Strongly Disagree 47 1.0% 25 1.8% 26 1.2% 10 1.9% 108 1.2%

Omits/Multi-Marked*

Mean

COE Nursing

College School Overall Comparison

1.56

Overall

120 30 16 7 173

1. The faculty made the class aware of the objectives at the onset of the course

A&S COB

1.59

1.35

291 81 45 27 444

1.34 1.34 1.31

1.53

2. The faculty's grading criteria were clearly defined

3. The faculty's course evaluation methods (i.e. grading, tests) were specified in the syllabus

1.45

290 87 44 29 450

1.46 1.41 1.41

1.41

(2)

Strongly Agree 3563 75.8% 1052 74.8% 1694 77.8% 373 70.4% 6682 75.8%

Somewhat Agree 769 16.4% 236 16.8% 302 13.9% 105 19.8% 1412 16.0%

Neutral 253 5.4% 73 5.2% 122 5.6% 30 5.7% 478 5.4%

Somewhat Disagree 68 1.4% 22 1.6% 35 1.6% 15 2.8% 140 1.6%

Strongly Disagree 50 1.1% 23 1.6% 25 1.1% 7 1.3% 105 1.2%

Omits/Multi-Marked*

Mean

Strongly Agree 3439 73.0% 1010 71.8% 1642 75.4% 364 68.7% 6455 73.2%

Somewhat Agree 807 17.1% 266 18.9% 353 16.2% 105 19.8% 1531 17.4%

Neutral 336 7.1% 84 6.0% 130 6.0% 38 7.2% 588 6.7%

Somewhat Disagree 78 1.7% 22 1.6% 32 1.5% 13 2.5% 145 1.6%

Strongly Disagree 50 1.1% 24 1.7% 20 0.9% 10 1.9% 104 1.2%

Omits/Multi-Marked*

Mean

Strongly Agree 3305 70.2% 969 68.7% 1583 72.6% 346 65.3% 6203 70.3%

Somewhat Agree 766 16.3% 267 18.9% 357 16.4% 102 19.2% 1492 16.9%

Neutral 479 10.2% 110 7.8% 164 7.5% 43 8.1% 796 9.0%

Somewhat Disagree 86 1.8% 33 2.3% 50 2.3% 20 3.8% 189 2.1%

Strongly Disagree 72 1.5% 31 2.2% 27 1.2% 19 3.6% 149 1.7%

Omits/Multi-Marked*

Mean

24 459

1.36 1.38 1.34 1.45 1.36

304 83 48

297 83 49 24 453

45 24 447

1.41 1.42 1.36 1.49

1.48

1.48 1.50

4. The faculty's course objectives were stated clearly in the course syllabus

5. The faculty's course syllabus defined academic and/or clinical expectations of the student for successful course completion

6. The faculty's required readings supported meeting the course objectives

1.43 1.61

1.40

(3)

Strongly Agree 3548 75.1% 1048 75.2% 1689 77.7% 351 66.5% 6636 75.2%

Somewhat Agree 721 15.3% 196 14.1% 310 14.3% 90 17.0% 1317 14.9%

Neutral 288 6.1% 110 7.9% 120 5.5% 58 11.0% 576 6.5%

Somewhat Disagree 94 2.0% 20 1.4% 31 1.4% 19 3.6% 164 1.9%

Strongly Disagree 73 1.5% 20 1.4% 24 1.1% 10 1.9% 127 1.4%

Omits/Multi-Marked*

Mean

Strongly Agree 3502 74.4% 969 69.4% 1608 73.8% 345 65.1% 6424 72.9%

Somewhat Agree 740 15.7% 235 16.8% 342 15.7% 92 17.4% 1409 16.0%

Neutral 283 6.0% 133 9.5% 140 6.4% 52 9.8% 608 6.9%

Somewhat Disagree 98 2.1% 40 2.9% 55 2.5% 26 4.9% 219 2.5%

Strongly Disagree 81 1.7% 19 1.4% 35 1.6% 15 2.8% 150 1.7%

Omits/Multi-Marked*

Mean

Strongly Agree 3301 70.0% 919 65.8% 1535 70.7% 318 59.7% 6073 68.9%

Somewhat Agree 820 17.4% 257 18.4% 376 17.3% 91 17.1% 1544 17.5%

Neutral 367 7.8% 135 9.7% 151 7.0% 52 9.8% 705 8.0%

Somewhat Disagree 133 2.8% 53 3.8% 62 2.9% 35 6.6% 283 3.2%

Strongly Disagree 93 2.0% 32 2.3% 47 2.2% 37 6.9% 209 2.4%

Omits/Multi-Marked*

Mean

26 456

1.40 1.40 1.34 1.57 1.39

283 95 52

303 93 46 24 466

8. The faculty kept lectures and discussions focused on relevant content

1.41 1.50 1.43 1.63

1.48 1.84

1.44

293 93 55 21 462

9. The faculty's presentations were well organized

1.53

1.49 1.58

(4)

Strongly Agree 3231 68.5% 919 64.9% 1543 70.9% 329 62.0% 6022 68.2%

Somewhat Agree 833 17.7% 263 18.6% 397 18.3% 98 18.5% 1591 18.0%

Neutral 385 8.2% 138 9.8% 142 6.5% 46 8.7% 711 8.0%

Somewhat Disagree 172 3.6% 61 4.3% 58 2.7% 24 4.5% 315 3.6%

Strongly Disagree 94 2.0% 34 2.4% 35 1.6% 34 6.4% 197 2.2%

Omits/Multi-Marked*

Mean

Strongly Agree 3087 65.5% 771 55.0% 1509 69.6% 337 63.3% 5704 64.7%

Somewhat Agree 815 17.3% 273 19.5% 377 17.4% 107 20.1% 1572 17.8%

Neutral 538 11.4% 234 16.7% 199 9.2% 61 11.5% 1032 11.7%

Somewhat Disagree 159 3.4% 70 5.0% 58 2.7% 19 3.6% 306 3.5%

Strongly Disagree 113 2.4% 53 3.8% 25 1.2% 8 1.5% 199 2.3%

Omits/Multi-Marked*

Mean

Strongly Agree 3332 71.0% 958 68.3% 1581 72.9% 334 62.7% 6205 70.5%

Somewhat Agree 822 17.5% 258 18.4% 369 17.0% 111 20.8% 1560 17.7%

Neutral 345 7.4% 120 8.6% 157 7.2% 45 8.4% 667 7.6%

Somewhat Disagree 112 2.4% 43 3.1% 43 2.0% 26 4.9% 224 2.5%

Strongly Disagree 82 1.7% 23 1.6% 19 0.9% 17 3.2% 141 1.6%

Omits/Multi-Marked*

Mean

10. The faculty clearly aided students in achieving learning objectives for the course

23 440

1.53 1.61 1.46 1.75 1.54

292 74 51

295 88 58 22 463

11. The faculty encouraged student-to-student engagement opportunities

1.60 1.83 1.48 1.60

1.41 1.65

1.61

314 87 57 21 479

12. The faculty provided opportunities for students to interact with him/her

1.47

(5)

Strongly Agree 2898 61.6% 796 57.1% 1347 62.1% 298 55.8% 5339 60.6%

Somewhat Agree 887 18.8% 285 20.4% 447 20.6% 99 18.5% 1718 19.5%

Neutral 508 10.8% 172 12.3% 232 10.7% 56 10.5% 968 11.0%

Somewhat Disagree 241 5.1% 85 6.1% 96 4.4% 43 8.1% 465 5.3%

Strongly Disagree 172 3.7% 56 4.0% 48 2.2% 38 7.1% 314 3.6%

Omits/Multi-Marked*

Mean

Strongly Agree 3035 64.6% 804 57.7% 1455 67.1% 308 58.3% 5602 63.8%

Somewhat Agree 852 18.1% 274 19.7% 393 18.1% 102 19.3% 1621 18.4%

Neutral 413 8.8% 162 11.6% 190 8.8% 42 8.0% 807 9.2%

Somewhat Disagree 251 5.3% 90 6.5% 72 3.3% 39 7.4% 452 5.1%

Strongly Disagree 148 3.1% 63 4.5% 57 2.6% 37 7.0% 305 3.5%

Omits/Multi-Marked*

Mean

Strongly Agree 3415 72.5% 949 67.9% 1610 74.3% 343 64.8% 6317 71.7%

Somewhat Agree 738 15.7% 239 17.1% 355 16.4% 105 19.8% 1437 16.3%

Neutral 338 7.2% 133 9.5% 144 6.6% 38 7.2% 653 7.4%

Somewhat Disagree 135 2.9% 41 2.9% 38 1.8% 27 5.1% 241 2.7%

Strongly Disagree 87 1.8% 35 2.5% 19 0.9% 16 3.0% 157 1.8%

Omits/Multi-Marked*

Mean

13. The faculty recognized when students did not understand new material

20 472

1.70 1.79 1.64 1.92 1.72

301 95 56

308 96 59 26 489

14. The faculty adequately explained confusing and/or complex material

1.64 1.80 1.56 1.85

1.38 1.62

1.66

294 92 60 25 471

15. The faculty encouraged students to ask questions

1.46

(6)

Strongly Agree 3353 71.5% 917 65.8% 1566 72.3% 344 64.7% 6180 70.4%

Somewhat Agree 775 16.5% 245 17.6% 366 16.9% 88 16.5% 1474 16.8%

Neutral 359 7.7% 152 10.9% 158 7.3% 47 8.8% 716 8.2%

Somewhat Disagree 120 2.6% 46 3.3% 51 2.4% 30 5.6% 247 2.8%

Strongly Disagree 82 1.7% 33 2.4% 26 1.2% 23 4.3% 164 1.9%

Omits/Multi-Marked*

Mean

Strongly Agree 3220 68.5% 918 65.8% 1498 69.0% 325 61.3% 5961 67.8%

Somewhat Agree 810 17.2% 271 19.4% 433 19.9% 99 18.7% 1613 18.3%

Neutral 399 8.5% 119 8.5% 142 6.5% 51 9.6% 711 8.1%

Somewhat Disagree 154 3.3% 48 3.4% 58 2.7% 28 5.3% 288 3.3%

Strongly Disagree 115 2.4% 40 2.9% 40 1.8% 27 5.1% 222 2.5%

Omits/Multi-Marked*

Mean

Strongly Agree 3169 67.4% 924 66.2% 1504 69.3% 328 61.7% 5925 67.3%

Somewhat Agree 874 18.6% 277 19.9% 416 19.2% 123 23.1% 1690 19.2%

Neutral 433 9.2% 125 9.0% 153 7.1% 46 8.6% 757 8.6%

Somewhat Disagree 129 2.7% 33 2.4% 60 2.8% 13 2.4% 235 2.7%

Strongly Disagree 100 2.1% 36 2.6% 37 1.7% 22 4.1% 195 2.2%

Omits/Multi-Marked*

Mean

16. The faculty displayed motivation and energy in teaching the course

22 495

1.47 1.59 1.43 1.68 1.49

318 96 59

309 93 55 24 481

17. The faculty's assignments added to my understanding of the subject

1.54 1.58 1.48 1.74

1.48 1.64

1.54

302 94 56 22 474

18. The faculty's course assignments encouraged my critical thinking ability

1.53

(7)

Strongly Agree 3290 70.3% 930 66.4% 1564 72.2% 330 62.5% 6114 69.7%

Somewhat Agree 845 18.0% 284 20.3% 394 18.2% 113 21.4% 1636 18.6%

Neutral 365 7.8% 127 9.1% 138 6.4% 44 8.3% 674 7.7%

Somewhat Disagree 111 2.4% 36 2.6% 44 2.0% 25 4.7% 216 2.5%

Strongly Disagree 72 1.5% 24 1.7% 25 1.2% 16 3.0% 137 1.6%

Omits/Multi-Marked*

Mean

Strongly Agree 3145 67.3% 869 62.5% 1484 68.7% 324 61.2% 5822 66.5%

Somewhat Agree 857 18.3% 279 20.1% 434 20.1% 101 19.1% 1671 19.1%

Neutral 475 10.2% 172 12.4% 179 8.3% 69 13.0% 895 10.2%

Somewhat Disagree 115 2.5% 41 2.9% 43 2.0% 19 3.6% 218 2.5%

Strongly Disagree 79 1.7% 29 2.1% 20 0.9% 16 3.0% 144 1.6%

Omits/Multi-Marked*

Mean

Strongly Agree 3095 66.2% 904 64.8% 1538 71.0% 347 65.3% 5884 67.1%

Somewhat Agree 802 17.2% 268 19.2% 391 18.0% 105 19.8% 1566 17.9%

Neutral 512 11.0% 130 9.3% 151 7.0% 45 8.5% 838 9.6%

Somewhat Disagree 128 2.7% 50 3.6% 55 2.5% 17 3.2% 250 2.9%

Strongly Disagree 135 2.9% 42 3.0% 32 1.5% 17 3.2% 226 2.6%

Omits/Multi-Marked*

Mean

19. The faculty provided information which allowed students to meet course objectives

26 499

1.47 1.53 1.42 1.64 1.48

324 88 61

336 99 66 25 526

20. The faculty presented diverse points of view relevant to course content

1.53 1.62 1.46 1.68

1.46 1.59

1.54

335 95 59 23 512

21. The faculty used information technology effectively in this course

1.56

(8)

Strongly Agree 2989 64.3% 883 63.7% 1577 73.0% 351 66.9% 5800 66.5%

Somewhat Agree 827 17.8% 250 18.0% 368 17.0% 97 18.5% 1542 17.7%

Neutral 585 12.6% 161 11.6% 142 6.6% 52 9.9% 940 10.8%

Somewhat Disagree 129 2.8% 55 4.0% 45 2.1% 17 3.2% 246 2.8%

Strongly Disagree 116 2.5% 37 2.7% 27 1.3% 8 1.5% 188 2.2%

Omits/Multi-Marked*

Mean

Strongly Agree 3049 65.5% 868 62.3% 1489 68.8% 338 64.3% 5744 65.7%

Somewhat Agree 830 17.8% 257 18.4% 399 18.4% 100 19.0% 1586 18.1%

Neutral 507 10.9% 170 12.2% 194 9.0% 54 10.3% 925 10.6%

Somewhat Disagree 167 3.6% 55 3.9% 52 2.4% 17 3.2% 291 3.3%

Strongly Disagree 102 2.2% 44 3.2% 30 1.4% 17 3.2% 193 2.2%

Omits/Multi-Marked*

Mean

Strongly Agree 3196 68.4% 1026 73.2% 1477 68.3% 296 56.3% 5995 68.4%

Somewhat Agree 797 17.1% 237 16.9% 412 19.1% 102 19.4% 1548 17.7%

Neutral 423 9.1% 76 5.4% 147 6.8% 45 8.6% 691 7.9%

Somewhat Disagree 135 2.9% 36 2.6% 62 2.9% 41 7.8% 274 3.1%

Strongly Disagree 120 2.6% 26 1.9% 63 2.9% 42 8.0% 251 2.9%

Omits/Multi-Marked*

Mean

22. The faculty incorporated current research in the course

29 560

1.61 1.64 1.41 1.54 1.56

361 103 67

1.67 1.49 1.62

352 95 62 28 537

23. The faculty encouraged multiple forms of communication from students

1.92

1.58

336 88 65 28 517

24. The faculty's tests and assignments were graded and returned promptly

1.59

1.54

(9)

Strongly Agree 3455 74.3% 1033 74.5% 1666 77.0% 351 66.5% 6505 74.5%

Somewhat Agree 631 13.6% 199 14.3% 310 14.3% 91 17.2% 1231 14.1%

Neutral 330 7.1% 115 8.3% 118 5.5% 51 9.7% 614 7.0%

Somewhat Disagree 113 2.4% 19 1.4% 32 1.5% 25 4.7% 189 2.2%

Strongly Disagree 123 2.6% 21 1.5% 39 1.8% 10 1.9% 193 2.2%

Omits/Multi-Marked*

Mean

Strongly Agree 3277 70.9% 921 66.3% 1551 72.1% 300 60.9% 6049 69.9%

Somewhat Agree 732 15.8% 253 18.2% 329 15.3% 85 17.2% 1399 16.2%

Neutral 367 7.9% 128 9.2% 164 7.6% 47 9.5% 706 8.2%

Somewhat Disagree 126 2.7% 46 3.3% 50 2.3% 33 6.7% 255 2.9%

Strongly Disagree 118 2.6% 42 3.0% 57 2.6% 28 5.7% 245 2.8%

Omits/Multi-Marked*

Mean

Total Number of Responses

The responses are from the Fall 2008 Faculty/Course evaluation paper and on-line surveys.

25. The faculty was fair and unbiased in interactions with students

544

1.46 1.41 1.37 1.58 1.43

355 102 61 26

1.79

387 99 75 61 622

26. The faculty provided feedback on written assignments, tests, and/or projects

1.53

1.50 1.59 1.48

*Omits/Multi-Marked responses are not included in the overall percentage for each question. ** Percentages may not total 100% due to rounding.

References

Related documents

• A daily log of clinical hours will be kept by the student and retained by the course faculty... Expectations

• An approved academic dual credit course may count as a DAP measure when a grade of 3.0 (B) or higher is earned. • Upon successful completion of the course, a student

A student who does not meet the attendance requirements of a class as stated in the course syllabus and does not officially withdraw from that course by the official census date

Withdrawal from the course must be initiated by the student following procedures outlines in the current Eastern Wyoming College catalog.

A student who does not meet the attendance requirements of a class as stated in the course syllabus and does not officially withdraw from that course by the official census date

In an effort to systematically increase student success, in 2007 the campus community worked diligently to review and revise the UTB/TSC policy on Satisfactory Academic Progress,

attributed to several contributing factors. Distinguished, long-standing faculty are ultimately an essential ingredient of a successful academic program. Therefore, an

Your continuation in this course constitutes a valid contract between the instructor and you as a student with the understanding that you have read the syllabus and the