High-Yield Bond Study
Call Protection ... 5
Debt ... 10
Restricted Payments/Investments ... 51
Liens ... 94
Affiliate Transactions ... 101
Asset Sales ... 118
Merger Covenant... 129
Registration Rights ... 137
Covenant Suspension/ Fall Away ... 147
Collateral ... 164
Andrew Bettwy
Partner, Global Capital Markets and Finance
212.969.3180
[email protected]
Andrew Fung, CFA
Global Capital Markets Manager
212.969.5031
[email protected]
Maximillian P. Kirchner
Senior Counsel, Global Capital Markets
44.20.7539.0621
[email protected]
Roberto Bruno
Partner, Global Capital Markets
44.20.7539.0639
[email protected]
Justin Breen
Partner, Global Capital Markets and Finance
212.969.3055
[email protected]
Philippa M. Bond
Partner, Global Capital Markets
310.284.5607
[email protected]
Los Angeles
Frank J. Lopez
Co-Head, Global Capital Markets
212.969.3492
High-Yield Issuance in 2013
•
Issuances of high-yield bonds hit new highs in
2013. Driven by investors’ demand for yield and
appetite for risk, deal count and deal value rose
to 808 and $376 billion, respectively, from 769
and $365 billion in 2012.
•
Issuers took advantage of low interest rates, as
nearly half of deal value (43%) was used for
refinancing.
•
The U.S. dominated geographical activity, accounting
for nearly 80% of both deal count and deal value. EMEA was a distant second at 12% of deal
count and 5% of deal value.
•
The most active industries were manufacturing and communications, which combined for 34% of
deal count and 40% of deal value. In terms of ratings, BB rated deals led the way with 34% of deal
count and 45% of deal value.
543 $253 769 $365 808 $376 0 300 600 900
Deal count Deal value (billions)
HIGH-YIELD ISSUANCE 2011-2013
Methodology
General
• Reviewed 939 high-yield deals closed globally from 2011 – 2013
• Data broken down by geography, deal size, industry, rating and whether sponsor-backed
• Outliers that were three or more standard deviations away from the mean for any given data set were excluded from our calculations • In circumstances where less than 1% of reviewed transactions contained a specific term, such term was excluded from our calculations • Deals in the sample population with only a pledge of stock are considered to be secured deals for purposes of this study
• Deals reviewed also include high-yield rated bonds with investment grade or hybrid covenant packages. These deals have been excluded for purposes of covenant analysis. Allocation
• In our geographic analysis, Canada is included in the U.S. data, Australia is included in the Asia data, and issuers operating in the Caribbean are included in the Latin America data.
• In our industry breakdown, deals by issuers in the sample population are categorized as follows: - issuers in the real estate industry are included in our Hospitality/Gaming category - issuers in the power and mining industries are included in our Industrials category - service providers to the oil & gas industry are included in our Oil & Gas category Financial Metrics
• EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization) and total assets calculations were based on of the applicable issuer’s trailing four quarter (or LTM, if applicable) data disclosed in the relevant marketing materials
• References in this study to EBITDA include "Adjusted EBITDA" when the relevant marketing materials contained such presentations and “Pro Forma EBITDA/Adjusted EBITDA” when such metrics were presented
Ratings
• All ratings categories are based on credit ratings by Standard & Poor’s • Calculations based solely on rating exclude deals that were not rated
• The rating categories do not distinguish “+” or “–” signs within a ratings category Definitions
Categories of Analysis
•
Geography:
-
U.S./Canada
-
Europe, Middle-East and Africa (EMEA)
-
Asia
-
Latin America
•
Size of Deal:
-
Small: 0 - $200 million
-
Medium: $201 - $499 million
-
Large: $500 million+
•
Industry:
-
Consumer
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Hospitality/Gaming
-
Industrials
-
Oil & Gas
-
Technology, Media and Telecommunications (TMT)
•
Ratings
-
BB
% of Deals with 103% Redemption
•
103% Redemption
: Ability to call 10% of bonds per year at 103% during non-call period
Global
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25%8%
92%
Global 2013
% of Deals with 103% Redemption
Geographies
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25%US EMEA Asia Latin America
Deal Size
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25%Small Medium Large
---% of Deals with 103---% Redemption
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25%Consumer Financial Services Healthcare Hospitality/Gaming Industrials Oil & Gas TMT
---Industry
---% of Deals with 103---% Redemption
Ratings
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25%Sponsor
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% BB B CCC---Ratio Debt
Global
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 201379%
15%
6%
Global 2013
50% 75% 100%
Geographic Breakdown
US
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013FCCR
Leverage
Both
EMEA
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Asia
Latin America
50% 75% 100%
Deal Size Breakdown
Small
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Medium
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Large
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Industry Breakdown
Consumer
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Hospitality / Gaming
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Industrials
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Oil & Gas
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013
TMT
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Financial Services
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Healthcare
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Ratings Breakdown
BB
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013B
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013CCC
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Ratio Debt
Sponsor
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 201384%
11%
5%
Sponsor 2013
% of Deals with FCCR of 2.0x vs. FCCR of Greater than 2.0x
Global
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 201378%
22%
Global 2013
50% 75% 100%
% of Deals with FCCR of 2.0x vs. FCCR of Greater than 2.0x
US
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013FCCR of 2.0x
FCCR of > 2.0x
EMEA
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Asia
Latin America
50% 75% 100%
% of Deals with FCCR of 2.0x vs. FCCR of Greater than 2.0x
Small
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Medium
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Large
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013% of Deals with FCCR of 2.0x vs. FCCR of Greater than 2.0x
Consumer
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Hospitality / Gaming
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Industrials
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Oil & Gas
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013
TMT
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Financial Services
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Healthcare
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013% of Deals with FCCR of 2.0x vs. FCCR of Greater than 2.0x
BB
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013B
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013CCC
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013% of Deals with FCCR of 2.0x vs. FCCR of Greater than 2.0x
Sponsor
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 201381%
19%
Sponsor 2013
Global Analysis
% of EBITDA
% of Assets
0% 50% 100% 150% 200% 250% 300% 350% 400% 450% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50%Geographic Breakdown
% of EBITDA
% of Assets
0% 50% 100% 150% 200% 250% 300% 350% 400% 450%US EMEA Asia Latin America
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50%
Deal Size Breakdown
% of EBITDA
% of Assets
0% 50% 100% 150% 200% 250% 300% 350% 400% 450%Small Medium Large
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50%
Industry Breakdown
% of EBITDA
% of Assets
0% 50% 100% 150% 200% 250% 300% 350% 400% 450% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50%Ratings Breakdown
% of EBITDA
% of Assets
0% 50% 100% 150% 200% 250% 300% 350% 400% 450% BB B CCC 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% BB B CCCSponsor Breakdown
% of EBITDA
% of Assets
0% 50% 100% 150% 200% 250% 300% 350% 400% 450% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50%% of Deals with JV Debt Basket
Global
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%13%
87%
Global 2013
% of Deals with JV Debt Basket
Geographies
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%US EMEA Asia Latin America
Deal Size
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%Small Medium Large
---% of Deals with JV Debt Basket
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%Consumer Financial Services Healthcare Hospitality/Gaming Industrials Oil & Gas TMT
Industry
---% of Deals with JV Debt Basket
Ratings
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%Sponsor
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% BB B CCCGlobal Analysis
% of EBITDA
% of Assets
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 0% 1% 2% 3% 4%Geographic Breakdown
% of EBITDA
% of Assets
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35%US EMEA Asia Latin America
0% 1% 2% 3% 4%
US EMEA Asia Latin America
---Deal Size Breakdown
% of EBITDA
% of Assets
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35%Small Medium Large
0% 1% 2% 3% 4%
Industry Breakdown
% of EBITDA
% of Assets
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 0% 1% 2% 3% 4% ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- --------Ratings Breakdown
% of EBITDA
% of Assets
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% BB B CCC 0% 1% 2% 3% 4% BB B CCCSponsor Breakdown
% of EBITDA
% of Assets
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% Sponsor 0% 1% 2% 3% 4% SponsorGlobal Analysis
% of EBITDA
% of Assets
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8%Geographic Breakdown
% of EBITDA
% of Assets
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35%US EMEA Asia Latin America
0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8%
Deal Size Breakdown
% of EBITDA
% of Assets
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35%Small Medium Large
0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8%
Industry Breakdown
% of EBITDA
% of Assets
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8%Ratings Breakdown
% of EBITDA
% of Assets
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% BB B CCC 0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% BB B CCCSponsor Breakdown
% of EBITDA
% of Assets
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8%Global Analysis
% of EBITDA
% of Assets
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% 0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5%Geographic Breakdown
% of EBITDA
% of Assets
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50%US EMEA Asia Latin America
0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5%
Deal Size Breakdown
% of EBITDA
% of Assets
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50%Small Medium Large
0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5%
Industry Breakdown
% of EBITDA
% of Assets
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% 0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5%Ratings Breakdown
% of EBITDA
% of Assets
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% BB B CCC 0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% BB B CCCSponsor Breakdown
% of EBITDA
% of Assets
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% 0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5%% of Deals with Net Income-Based vs. Cash Flow-Based Build-Up
Global
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 201385%
15%
Global 2013
50% 75% 100%
% of Deals with Net Income-Based vs. Cash Flow-Based Build-Up
US
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Net Income-Based
Cash Flow-Based
EMEA
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Asia
Latin America
50% 75% 100%
% of Deals with Net Income-Based vs. Cash Flow-Based Build-Up
Small
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Medium
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Large
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013% of Deals with Net Income-Based vs. Cash Flow-Based Build-Up
Consumer
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Hospitality / Gaming
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Industrials
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Oil & Gas
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013
TMT
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Financial Services
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Healthcare
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013% of Deals with Net Income-Based vs. Cash Flow-Based Build-Up
BB
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013B
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013CCC
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013% of Deals with Net Income-Based vs. Cash Flow-Based Build-Up
Sponsor
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 201393%
7%
Sponsor 2013
% of Deals with Basket
Global
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%44%
56%
Global 2013
% of Deals with Basket
Geographies
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%US EMEA Asia Latin America
Deal Size
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%Small Medium Large
---% of Deals with Basket
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%Consumer Financial Services Healthcare Hospitality/Gaming Industrials Oil & Gas TMT
Industry
---% of Deals with Basket
Ratings
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%Sponsor
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% BB B CCC% of Deals with Basket
Global
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%42%
58%
Global 2013
% of Deals with Basket
Geographies
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%US EMEA Asia Latin America
Deal Size
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%Small Medium Large
---% of Deals with Basket
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%Consumer Financial Services Healthcare Hospitality/Gaming Industrials Oil & Gas TMT
Industry
---% of Deals with Basket
Ratings
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%Sponsor
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% BB B CCC% of Deals with Basket
Global
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%37%
63%
Global 2013
% of Deals with Basket
Geographies
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%US EMEA Asia Latin America
Deal Size
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%Small Medium Large
---% of Deals with Basket
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%Consumer Financial Services Healthcare Hospitality/Gaming Industrials Oil & Gas TMT
Industry
---% of Deals with Basket
Ratings
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%Sponsor
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% BB B CCC% of Deals with Basket
Global
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%92%
8%
Global 2013
% of Deals with Basket
Geographies
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%US EMEA Asia Latin America
Deal Size
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%% of Deals with Basket
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%Consumer Financial Services Healthcare Hospitality/Gaming Industrials Oil & Gas TMT
% of Deals with Basket
Ratings
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%Sponsor
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% BB B CCC% of Deals with Basket
Global
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%54%
46%
Global 2013
% of Deals with Basket
Geographies
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%US EMEA Asia Latin America
Deal Size
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%% of Deals with Basket
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%Consumer Financial Services Healthcare Hospitality/Gaming Industrials Oil & Gas TMT
% of Deals with Basket
Ratings
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%Sponsor
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% BB B CCCGlobal Analysis
% of EBITDA
% of Assets
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5%Geographic Breakdown
% of EBITDA
% of Assets
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45%US EMEA Asia Latin America
0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5%
US EMEA Asia Latin America
---Deal Size Breakdown
% of EBITDA
% of Assets
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45%Small Medium Large
0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5%
Industry Breakdown
% of EBITDA
% of Assets
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5%----Ratings Breakdown
% of EBITDA
% of Assets
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% BB B CCC 0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% BB B CCCSponsor Breakdown
% of EBITDA
% of Assets
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5%% of EBITDA
Global
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35%Geographies
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35%% of EBITDA
Deal Size
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35%Small Medium Large
Industries
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35%% of EBITDA
Ratings
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% BB B CCCSponsor
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35%Global Analysis
% of EBITDA
% of Assets
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5%Geographic Breakdown
% of EBITDA
% of Assets
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45%US EMEA Asia Latin America
0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5%
Deal Size Breakdown
% of EBITDA
% of Assets
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45%Small Medium Large
0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5%
Industry Breakdown
% of EBITDA
% of Assets
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5%Ratings Breakdown
% of EBITDA
% of Assets
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% BB B CCC 0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% BB B CCCSponsor Breakdown
% of EBITDA
% of Assets
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5%% of Deals with Grower
Global
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%44%
56%
Global 2013
% of Deals with Grower
Geographies
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%US EMEA Asia Latin America
Deal Size
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%Small Medium Large
---% of Deals with Grower
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%Consumer Financial Services Healthcare Hospitality/Gaming Industrials Oil & Gas TMT
% of Deals with Grower
Ratings
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%Sponsor
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% BB B CCC% of Total Assets
Global
0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 10%Geographies
0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 10%% of Total Assets
Deal Size
0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 10%Small Medium Large
Industries
0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 10%% of Total Assets
Ratings
0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 10% BB B CCCSponsor
0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 10%% of Deals with Fairness Opinion Requirements
Global
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%56%
44%
Global 2013
% of Deals with Fairness Opinion Requirements
Geographies
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%US EMEA Asia Latin America
Deal Size
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%% of Deals with Fairness Opinion Requirements
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%Consumer Financial Services Healthcare Hospitality/Gaming Industrials Oil & Gas TMT
% of Deals with Fairness Opinion Requirements
Ratings
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%Sponsor
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% BB B CCCGlobal Analysis
% of EBITDA
% of Assets
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 0% 1% 2% 3% 4%Geographic Breakdown
% of EBITDA
% of Assets
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%US EMEA Asia Latin America
0% 1% 2% 3% 4%
Deal Size Breakdown
% of EBITDA
% of Assets
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%Small Medium Large
0% 1% 2% 3% 4%
Industry Breakdown
% of EBITDA
% of Assets
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 0% 1% 2% 3% 4%Ratings Breakdown
% of EBITDA
% of Assets
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% BB B CCC 0% 1% 2% 3% 4% BB B CCCSponsor Breakdown
% of EBITDA
% of Assets
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 0% 1% 2% 3% 4%Global Analysis
% of EBITDA
% of Assets
0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 0% 1% 2% 3% 4%Geographic Breakdown
% of EBITDA
% of Assets
0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12%US EMEA Asia Latin America
0% 1% 2% 3% 4%
Deal Size Breakdown
% of EBITDA
% of Assets
0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12%Small Medium Large
0% 1% 2% 3% 4%
Industry Breakdown
% of EBITDA
% of Assets
0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 0% 1% 2% 3% 4%Ratings Breakdown
% of EBITDA
% of Assets
0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% BB B CCC 0% 1% 2% 3% 4% BB B CCCSponsor Breakdown
% of EBITDA
% of Assets
0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 0% 1% 2% 3% 4%Reinvestment Period*
Global
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 20131%
87%
12%
Global 2013
50% 75% 100%
Geographic Breakdown
US
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013< 360 Days
360 – 365 Days
> 360 Days
EMEA
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Asia
Latin America
50% 75% 100%
Deal Size Breakdown
Small
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Medium
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Large
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Industry Breakdown
Consumer
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Hospitality / Gaming
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Industrials
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Oil & Gas
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013
TMT
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Financial Services
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Healthcare
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Ratings Breakdown
BB
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013B
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013CCC
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Reinvestment Period
Sponsor
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 20133%
70%
27%
Sponsor 2013
% of Deals with Carveout
Global
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%62%
38%
Global 2013
% of Deals with Carveout
Geographies
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%US EMEA Asia Latin America
Deal Size
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%% of Deals with Carveout
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%Consumer Financial Services Healthcare Hospitality/Gaming Industrials Oil & Gas TMT
% of Deals with Carveout
Ratings
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%Sponsor
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% BB B CCCRatio Debt Condition
•
Condition to merger requiring that: (1) applicable pro forma ratio debt capacity test is met, (2) the applicable ratio
is no worse on a pro forma basis or (3) pro forma improvement of the applicable ratio
25%
57%
18%
Global 2013
Global
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 201350% 75% 100%
Geographic Breakdown
US
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%2011 2012 2013
Must Meet Ratio Test
Ratio No Worse
Ratio Must Improve
EMEA
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Asia
Latin America
50% 75% 100%
Deal Size Breakdown
Small
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Medium
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Large
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Industry Breakdown
Consumer
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Hospitality / Gaming
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Industrials
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Oil & Gas
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013
TMT
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Financial Services
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Healthcare
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Ratings Breakdown
BB
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013B
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013CCC
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Ratio Debt Condition
Sponsor
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 201314%
69%
17%
Sponsor 2013
Registration Rights
Global
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 201356%
8%
36%
Global 2013
50% 75% 100%
Geographic Breakdown
US
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Private-for-Life
Registered
Registration Rights
EMEA
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Asia
Latin America
50% 75% 100%
Global Deal Size Breakdown
Small
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Medium
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Large
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013U.S. Deal Size Breakdown
Small
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Medium
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Large
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Global Industry Breakdown
Consumer
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Hospitality / Gaming
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Industrials
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Oil & Gas
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013
TMT
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Financial Services
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Healthcare
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013U.S. Industry Breakdown
Consumer
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Hospitality / Gaming
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Industrials
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Oil & Gas
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013
TMT
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Financial Services
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Healthcare
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Global Ratings Breakdown
BB
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013B
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013CCC
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013U.S. Ratings Breakdown
BB
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013B
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013CCC
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Global Sponsor Breakdown
Sponsor
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 201372%
4%
24%
Sponsor 2013
U.S. Sponsor Breakdown
Sponsor
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 201365%
6%
29%
Sponsor 2013
% of Deals with Suspension vs. Fall Away vs. Neither
64%
13%
23%
% of Deals with Suspension vs. Fall Away vs. Neither
Geographies 2013
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%US EMEA Asia Latin America
Deal Size 2013
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%% of Deals with Suspension vs. Fall Away vs. Neither
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%Consumer Financial Services Healthcare Hospitality/Gaming Industrials Oil & Gas TMT
% of Deals with Suspension vs. Fall Away vs. Neither
Ratings 2013
Sponsor 2013
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% BB B CCC74%
5%
20%
% of Deals with Suspension / Fall Away
Global
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%77%
23%
Global 2013
% of Deals with Suspension / Fall Away
Geographies
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%US EMEA Asia Latin America
Deal Size
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%% of Deals with Suspension / Fall Away
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%Consumer Financial Services Healthcare Hospitality/Gaming Industrials Oil & Gas TMT
% of Deals with Suspension / Fall Away
Ratings
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%Sponsor
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% BB B CCC% of Deals Requiring Investment Grade Ratings from Both Agencies
Global
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%94%
6%
Global 2013
% of Deals Requiring Investment Grade Ratings from Both Agencies
Geographies
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%US EMEA Asia Latin America
Deal Size
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%% of Deals Requiring Investment Grade Ratings from Both Agencies
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%Consumer Financial Services Healthcare Hospitality/Gaming Industrials Oil & Gas TMT
% of Deals Requiring Investment Grade Ratings from Both Agencies
Ratings
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%Sponsor
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% BB B CCC% of Deals with Change of Control Suspended
Global
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25%8%
92%
Global 2013
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25%
US EMEA Asia Latin America
---% of Deals with Change of Control Suspended
Geographies
Deal Size
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25%
Small Medium Large
---0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25%
Consumer Financial Services Healthcare Hospitality/Gaming Industrials Oil & Gas TMT
---% of Deals with Change of Control Suspended
Industry
---% of Deals with Change of Control Suspended
Ratings
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25%Sponsor
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% BB B CCCPriority of Collateral Package
Global
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 201354%
25%
21%
Global 2013
50% 75% 100%
Geographic Breakdown
US
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013First Lien
Second Lien
Split Lien
EMEA
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Asia
Latin America
50% 75% 100%
Deal Size Breakdown
Small
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Medium
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Large
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Industry Breakdown
Consumer
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Hospitality / Gaming
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Industrials
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Oil & Gas
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013
TMT
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Financial Services
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Healthcare
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Ratings Breakdown
BB
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013B
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013CCC
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Priority of Collateral Package
Sponsor
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 201360%
19%
21%
Sponsor 2013
Substantially All Collateral
Global
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 20133%
49%
14%
24%
10%
Global 2013
50% 75% 100%
Substantially All Collateral
Geographic Breakdown
US
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Majority
66.67%
75%
80%
90 - 95%
100%
EMEA
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Asia
Latin America
50% 75% 100%
Substantially All Collateral
Deal Size Breakdown
Small
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Medium
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Large
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Substantially All Collateral
Industry Breakdown
Consumer
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Hospitality / Gaming
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Industrials
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Oil & Gas
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013
TMT
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Financial Services
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Healthcare
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Substantially All Collateral
Ratings Breakdown
BB
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013B
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013CCC
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 2013Substantially All Collateral
Sponsor
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2011 2012 20135%
48%
10%
32%
5%
Sponsor 2013
% of Deals with Greater than 25% of Holders Required to
Accelerate
Global
0% 10% 20% 30%90%
10%
Global 2013
% of Deals with Greater than 25% of Holders Required to
Accelerate
Geographies
0% 10% 20% 30%US EMEA Asia Latin America
Deal Size
0% 10% 20% 30%
Small Medium Large
---% of Deals with Greater than 25---% of Holders Required to
Accelerate
0% 10% 20% 30%Consumer Financial Services Healthcare Hospitality/Gaming Industrials Oil & Gas TMT
Industry
---% of Deals with Greater than 25---% of Holders Required to
Accelerate
Ratings
0% 10% 20% 30%Sponsor
0% 10% 20% 30% BB B CCC---% of Total Assets
Global
0% 1% 2% 3% 4%Geographies
0% 1% 2% 3% 4%% of Total Assets
Deal Size
0% 1% 2% 3% 4%Small Medium Large