• No results found

Scopus - Print Document

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Scopus - Print Document"

Copied!
5
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Documents

Iamratanakul, S.a , Patanakul, P.b , Milosevic, D.c

Project portfolio selection: From past to present

(2008) Proceedings of the 4th IEEE International Conference on Management of Innovation and Technology, ICMIT, art. no. 4654378, pp. 287-292. Cited 1 time.

a School of Management, Asian Institute of Technology, Pathumthani, Thailand

b Howe School of Technology Management, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ, United States

c Department of Engineering and Technology Management, Portland State University, Portland, OR, United States

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to summarize the past and present literature on project portfolio selection. In particular, it highlights six groups of project portfolio selection methods. Based on the literature review, the content of this paper could be used as a basis for future study in this topic. ©2008 IEEE.

Author Keywords

Portfolio selection; Project portfolio management; Project selection

Index Keywords

Administrative data processing, Financial data processing, Investments; Literature reviews, Portfolio selection, Project portfolio management, Project portfolios, Project selection; Innovation

References

Liberatore, M.J., Pollack-Johnson, B.

Factors influencing the usage and selection of project management software

(2003) IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 50, pp. 164-174. Greiner, M.A., Fowler, J.W., Shunk, D.L., Carlyle, W.M., McNutt, R.T.

A hybrid approach using the analytic hierarchy process and integer programming to screen weapon systems projects

(2003) IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 50, pp. 192-203. Shang, J.S., Tjader, Y., Ding, Y.

A unified framework for multi-criteria evaluation of transportation projects

(2004) IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 51, pp. 300-313. Baker, N., Freeland, J.

Recent advances in R&D benefit measurement and project selection methods

(2)

Baker, N.R., Pound, W.H.

R&D project selection: Where we stand

(1964) IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 11. Wang, K., Wang, C.K., Hu, C.

Analytical hierarchy process with fuzzy scoring in evaluating multidisciplinary R&D projects in china

(2005) IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 52, pp. 119-129. Santiago, L.P., Bifano, T.G.

Management of R&D projects under uncertainty: A multidimensional approach to managerial flexibility

(2005) IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 52, pp. 269-280. Gupta, S.K., Mandakovic, T.

Contemporary approaches to R&D project selection: A literature search

(1992) Management of R&D and Engineering, pp. 67-87. D. F. Kocaoglu, Ed. Amsterdam: North Holland

Souder, W.E., Mandakovic, T.

R&D project selection models

(1986) Research Management, 29, pp. 36-42. Martino, J.P.

Project selection

(2003) Project management toolbox: Tools and techniques for the practicing project manager, pp. 53-64.

D. Milosevic, Ed. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons Jin, X.Y., Porter, A.L., Rossini, F.A., Anderson, E.D.

R&D project selection and evaluation: A microcomputer-based approach

(1987) R&D Management, 17, pp. 277-288. Liberatore, M.J.

An extension of the analytic hierarchy process for industrial R&D project selection and resource allocation

(1987) IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 34, pp. 12-18. Khorramshahgol, R., Azani, H., Gousty, Y.

An integrated approach to project evaluation and selection

(1988) IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 35, pp. 265-270. Suh, C.-K., Suh, E.-H., Back, K.-C.

Prioritizing telecommunications technologies for long-range R&D planning to the year 2006

(1994) IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 41, pp. 264-275. Lockett, G., Hetherington, B., Yallup, P.

Modeling a research portfolio using AHP: A group decision process

(1984) R&D Management, 16, pp. 151-160. Asher, D.T.

A linear programming model for the allocation of R and D efforts

(1962) IRE Transactions on Engineering Management, 94, pp. 154-157. Blanning, R.W.

Variable-base budgeting for R&D

(3)

Paolini, A., Glaser, M.A.

Project selection methods that pick winners

(1977) Research Management, 20, pp. 26-29. Winkofsky, E.P., Baker, N.R., Sweeney, D.J.

A decision process model of R&D resource allocation in hierarchical organizations

(1981) Management Science, 27, pp. 268-283. Jackson, B.

Decision methods for selecting a portfolio of R&D projects

(1983) Research Management, 26, pp. 21-26. Charnes, A., Stedry, A.C.

A chance-constrained model for real-time control in research and development management

(1966) Management Science, 12, pp. 353-362. Weber, R., Werners, B., Zimmermann, H.-J.

Planning models for research and development

(1990) European Journal of Operational Research, 48, pp. 175-188. Werners, B.

Interactive multiple objective programming subject to flexible constraints

(1987) European Journal of Operational Research, 31, pp. 342-349. Martino, J.P.

(1995) Research and Development: Project Selection, New York: John Wiley & Sons

Grossman, G.M., Shapiro, C.

Dynamic R&D competition

(1987) The Economic Journal, 97, pp. 372-387. Stahl, M.J., Harrell, A.M.

Identifying operative goals by modeling project selection decisions in research and development

(1983) IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 30, pp. 223-228. Cooper, R.G.

An empirically derived new product project selection model

(1981) IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 28, pp. 54-61. Schwartz, S.L., Vertinsky, I.

Multi-attribute investment decisions: A study of R&D project selection

(1977) Management Science, 24, pp. 285-301. Mathieu, R.G., Gibson, J.E.

A methodology for large-scale R&D planning based on cluster analysis

(1993) IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 40, pp. 283-292. Hall, D.L., Nauda, A.

An interactive approach for selection IR&D projects

(1990) IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 37, pp. 126-133. Liberatore, M.J., Stylianou, A.C.

The development manager's advisory system: A knowledge-based DSS tool for project assessment

(4)

About Scopus What is Scopus Content coverage What do users think Latest

Tutorials

Contact and Support Contact and support Live Chat

About Elsevier About Elsevier About SciVerse About SciVal

Terms and Conditions Privacy Policy

Pearson, A.W., Stratford, M.J.W., Wadee, A., Wilkinson, A.

Decision support systems in R&D project management

(1996) Handbook of technology management, G. H. Gaynor, Ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Schmidt, R.L., Freeland, J.R.

Recent progress in modeling R&D project-selection processes

(1992) IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 39, pp. 189-201. Vepsalainen, A.P.J., Lauro, G.

Analysis of R&D portfolio strategies for contract competitions

(1988) IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 35, pp. 181-186. Milling, P.M.

Modeling innovation processes for decision support and management simulation

(1996) System Dynamics Review, 12, pp. 211-234. Fox, E.G., Baker, N.R.

Project selection decision making linked to a dynamic environment

(1985) Management Science, 31, pp. 1272-1285. Mandakovic, T., Souder, W.E.

An interactive decomposable heuristic for project selection

(1985) Management Science, 31, pp. 1257-1271. Luehrman, T.A.

Investment Opportunities as Real Options: Getting Started on the Numbers

(1998) Harvard Business Review, 76, pp. 51-61.

Correspondence Address

Iamratanakul S.; School of Management, Asian Institute of Technology, Pathumthani, Thailand

Conference name: 4th IEEE International Conference on Management of Innovation and Technology, ICMIT

Conference date: 21 September 2008 through 24 September 2008

Conference location: Bangkok

Conference code: 74299

ISBN: 9781424423309

DOI: 10.1109/ICMIT.2008.4654378

Language of Original Document: English

Abbreviated Source Title: Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Manage. Innov. Technol., ICMIT

Document Type: Conference Paper

(5)

Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. SciVerse ® is a registered trademark of Elsevier Properties S.A., used under license. Scopus ® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.

References

Related documents

We report on seven years of attitudinal data using the Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Survey from University Modeling Instruction (UMI) sections of introductory physics

26 GERMANY, FRANCE, RUSSIA, AND ISLAM of the Turkish Empire, the valis, mullahs, and ulemas,.. the black and the white eunuchs, the odalisques

Embellishing tones are just as common in today’s popular and jazz styles as in concert music of the past. The passing tone remains the most common, while retardations and escape

1 Department of Basic Medical Sciences (BMS), Faculty of Medicine (FOM), International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM), Indera Mahkota Campus, 25200 Kuantan, Malaysia..

256 Table 6.10: Evaluation metrics for Autocorrelogram descriptor using sequential search, competing indexing methods and LUV indexing applied on Cartoon-11K Dataset.. 266

Melting point / freezing point: No data available Initial boiling point and boiling range: No data available Solid/gas flammability: No data available Upper/lower flammability

At this time we are waiting for the documentation from the manufacturers indicating a complete history and a definitive plan of action from DTE to remedy the condition of the

Platelet rich hemoderivatives (PRHds) have been explored for periodontal tissue engineering as sources of cytokines and structural proteins involved in the modulation of the