Fat Emulsion
Tolerance
in Very
Low Birth
Weight
Neonates:
Effect
on Diffusion
of
Oxygen
in the Lungs
and on Blood
pH
Yves W. Brans, MD, Elizabeth B. Dutton, BSN, Donna S. Andrew, MS,
Elizabeth M. Menchaca, BA, and Donna L. West, BSN
From the Perinatal Research Laboratory, Departments of Pediatrics and of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio
ABSTRACT. Forty-one very low birth weight neonates
(820 to 1,510 g and 27 to 34 weeks of gestation) requiring
total parenteral nutrition were randomly assigned to one
of three regimens of administration of fat emulsion for a
period of eight days. Groups I and II received the
emul-sion at a constant rate for, respectively, 24 and 16 hours,
beginning with a daily dosage of 1 g/kg and increasing
daily by 1 g/kg to a maximum of4 g/kg. Group III received
the emulsion at a constant rate or 4 g/kg for 24 hours.
Blood pH and alveolar-arteriolar gradient of oxygen
dif-fusion in the lungs were measured at regular intervals.
The various regimens and rates of fat infusion appeared
to have no deleterious effect on blood pH and
alveolar-arteriolar oxygen diffusion gradient. Infusion rates as
used in the study for appropriate for gestational age very
low birth weight neonates appear to be safe, although
caution is always warranted when dealing with tiny
neo-nates whose pulmonary reserve is minimal. In view of
data from other studies, it is suggested to infuse fat at a
constant rate for 24 hours to avoid overloading the
clear-ance mechanisms of fat particles from plasma. Pediatrics
1986;78:79-84, fat emuLsion, prematurity, oxygen diffusion gradient, blood pH.
substrate, infusion of fat emulsions may give rise
to considerable increases in plasma concentrations
of the various lipid fractions.4#{176} Coupled with the fact that those tiny neonates who most need fat
emulsions to ensure adequate caloric intakes
sel-dom have normal pulmonary function, serious
com-plications could potentially occur. Indeed, a syn-drome of pulmonary fat overload has been de-scribed.7 The frequency and severity of this
syn-drome
have
not yet been
properly
defined
and
nei-ther have the clinical situations in which it occurs, its pathophysiology, and whether in fact it is related to excessive intake of fat emulsion or to the under-lying disease. This study was designed to compare
the effects of three commonly used regimens for
infusion of fat emulsions. We report the effect of
fat emulsions on oxygen diffusion in the lungs and on blood pH homeostasis. Changes in plasma lipid patterns will be the object of a separate communi-cation.
Healthy adults who receive a fat emulsion par-enterally respond with a slight decrease in Pao2. This decrease in oxygen-diffusing capacity through the alveolar-arteriolar membrane in the lung par-allels the increase in plasma concentrations of
tn-glycenides.13 In healthy individuals, this side effect
is probably of little clinical importance. In view of
the limited metabolic tolerance of very low birth
weight neonates to any type of exogenous metabolic
Received for publication Sept 3, 1985; accepted Nov 11, 1985.
Reprint requests to (Y.W.B.) Department of Pediatrics, The
University of Texas Health Science Center, 7703 Floyd Curl Dr,
San Antonio, TX 78284.
PEDIATRICS (ISSN 0031 4005). Copyright © 1986 by the
American Academy of Pediatrics.
METHODS
Tolerance to parenterally administered fat
emul-sions was studied in neonates weighing 1,500 g or
less at birth. Informed parental consent was
ob-tamed
in all cases.
Birth
weights
were
recorded
to
the nearest
10 g. Gestational
ages were
determined
from the mother’s menstrual history, checked in
most cases by sonographic determination of the
biparietal diameter, and confirmed by physical ex-amination of the neonate.12 All neonates were
nor-mally grown, ie, their birth weights were between
the tenth and the 90th percentiles for gestational maturity, sex, and race. Separate birth weight-ges-tational age curves were used for white Latin-Amen-ican (C. E. Gibbs, unpublished data), white
less
than
750 g at birth or with estimated gesta-tional ages of less than 27 weeks were excludedfrom the study.
The
neonates were managed in accordance withthe usual practices for our nursery. Total parenteral nutrition was started on the third postnatal day
unless otherwise indicated. The solution provided 2.5 g/kg of crystalline amino acids, a maximum of 15 g/kg of dextrose (adjusted in cases of dextrose
intolerance), and 100 to 130 mL/kg of water each
day. Fat emulsion (Intralipid 10% or 20%, Kabi-Vitrum, Berkeley, CA) was infused according to one of three randomly allocated regimens. Neonates in
group
I received
the
fat emulsion
at constant
rate
for 24 hours, beginning with a daily dosage of 1 g/
kg and increasing by 1 g/kg on each successive day
up to a daily
maximum
of
4 g/kg. Neonates in groupII received
the
fat emulsion
at a constant
rate
for
16
hours followed by eight hours without infusionof fats; daily dosage was the same as in group I.
Neonates in group
III received
the
fat emulsion
at
a constant
rate
for 24 hours
with
daily
dosage
of
4g/kg from the beginning of the infusion. All fluids
were
administered
through
a catheter
placed
in the
umbilical artery or through a peripheral vein. The study was discontinued if a neonate’s plasma
ap-peared
frankly
creamy.
The study
period
lasted
eight
days. Arterial
blood
samples were obtained immediately before
begin-fling the lipid infusion or when changing the dosage
and
every
12 hours thereafter. Blood Pao2, Paco2,and
pH
were
determined
with
an AVL
blood
gas
analyzer. The alveolar-arteriolar gradient of oxygen
diffusion (A -
aDo2)
in the lungs was calculatedfrom
the formula:
A-aDo2
(PB -PH2O)
Fi02
-
PAco2
Fi02 +1 -
Fi02\
R
)PaO2where PB = atmospheric pressure; PH2O = partial
pressure of water in inspired gas; Fi02 = proportion
of oxygen in inspired gas; PAco2 = partial pressure
of carbon dioxide in alveoli, assumed to equal the
partial pressure of carbon dioxide in arterial blood
(Paco2);
R
= respiratory quotient = 0.8;and
Pa02
= partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood.
In groups
I and
III,
because
two
values
were
obtained each day while the infants received the same rate of lipid infusion, the average of the two
values was used. Each variable was analyzed by
means of one-way analysis of variance to detect
differences between the three groups at a given time
during the study. When main effect differences
were
detected
(F test, P < .05), Duncan’s multiplerange test was applied to locate differences between
means for various groups. A significance level of P
< .05 was chosen to define statistical significance.
Within each group, the mean value for each day of
study was compared with the preinfusion value by means of Student’s paired t test. Because eight
comparisons within a set of data were made, P <
.05/8
or
P < .006 was needed to indicate statisticallysignificant differences. In addition, for group II, the
values obtained on each day of study while fat
emulsion was infused were compared with the
preinfusion values for that day by means of
Stu-dent’s paired t test; a level of P < .006 was needed to indicate statistical significance.
RESULTS
Forty-one neonates were studied and are de-scribed in the Table. Birth weights ranged from 820
to
1,510 g, gestational ages ranged from 27 to 34weeks, and postnatal ages ranged from one to nine
days. There were no statistically significant
differ-ences between the three groups in mean birth
weights, mean gestational ages, and mean postnatal
ages. Ten neonates
did
not complete the eight-daystudy. In group I, one baby died of hyaline
mem-brane disease. In group II, one baby died of hyaline membrane disease, in two necrotizing enterocolitis developed and surgical treatment was required, one
became
severely
hyperlipemic,
one
was
removed
from the study at the request of the parents, and in
one
baby
the
lipid
infusion
was
interrupted
by
mistake.
In group
III, two babies
became
severely
hyperlipemic and one baby was removed from the
study when enteral feedings were started by
mis-take.
Data
from
these
neonates
until
the
time
of
discontinuation of the study were included in the
statistical analysis. Toward the end of the study
period,
data
were missed
when
blood
samples
could
not be obtained
in a timely
manner
or when
there
was no clinical justification to obtain samples of arterial blood.
Mean
A-aDo2
values
are
depicted
in Fig
1 foreach of the study groups. Preinfusion A-aDo2
val-ues ranged from 8 to 504 mm Hg and their distni-bution was similar in the three groups, with 60% of
neonates in group I, 57% of neonates in group II, and 58% of neonates in group III having preinfusion A-aDo2 values of 100 mm Hg or less. In groups I
and II, all but two neonates
had A-aDo2
values
that
decreased or stabilized during the period of the
study as would be expected from their improving or stable respiratory status. Two neonates in each
group
had
increasing
A-aDo2
values:
one
due
to
worsening of hyaline membrane disease and one to
t
TABLE. Characteristics of the 41 Neonates Studied
Characteristic Group I Group II Group III
No.ofneonates 15 14 12
Sex (M/F) 11/4 8/6 5/7
Race (Latin-American/Anglo- 13/1/1 9/3/2 9/3/0
American/Black)
Birth wt (g)* 1,190 ± 190
(820-1,480)
1,160 ± 217
(820-1,500)
1,190 ± 214
(840-1,510)
Gestational age (wk)* 29 ± 1.7
(27-34)
29 ± 1.4
(27-31)
29 ± 1.4
(28-31)
Postnatal age (d)* 4 ± 1.8
(1-9)
3 ± 1.4 (2-7)
3 ± 0.9 (2-5)
* Mean ± SD (range).
4
0
400-rJrJ
I
rJrJll1
I
1111
300-200
l00
fl= 15151412 II 7 5 5 4 1313139 7 7 3 4 3 12121010107653
Fig 1. Mean (±2 SE) alveolar-arteriolar gradient (mm Hg) of oxygen diffusion in lungs
before infusion of lipids and during infusion of lipids on each of eight days of study.
Corresponding rate of lipid infusion (mg/kg/24 h) is shown at top. Symbols denote
statistically significant differences at a given time between groups I and II (t)-and groups
II and III (1:) (analysis of variance and Duncan’s multiple range test, P < .05).
the data presented in Fig 1, mean A-aDo2 would
progressively decrease with duration of lipid infu-sion in all three groups. In group III, A-aDo2 values
decreased or stabilized in all neonates. Within each
group, A-aDo2 values during infusion of lipids were
not statistically different from preinfusion values,
ie, the mean differences between gradients on a given day or on a given rate of lipid infusion and
preinfusion gradients were not statistically
differ-ent from zero. On a given day during the study,
mean
A-aDo2
values
were
similar
in
all
study
groups, except on the very last day when the
A-aDo2 result
was significantly
higher
in group
II (168
± 74.4 mm
Hg) than
in either
group
I
(37 ± 7.4 mmHg)
or group
III
(41 ± 8.2 mmHg)
(P < .05).In
group II, the mean differences between infusion
and
preinfusion
A-aDo2
values
during
each
day of
the study were not statistically different from zero
(Fig 2). Of the two neonates who died during the study, only one had an autopsy performed, and there was no sign of fat accumulation in the lungs.
Mean blood pH values before infusion of lipids
and
during
each
day of lipid
infusion
are depicted
in Fig 3. The values ranged from 7.08 to 7.55 during
the
study.
Although
blood
pH
remained
within
normal limits during most of the study, values less
than 7.20 occurred transiently in six of 15 group I neonates, seven of 14 group II neonates, and five of 12 group III neonates. The occurrence of such low
pH
values
appeared
to be related
to a neonate’s
respiratory and perfusion status and not to changes
300
-200
10
0-
7.50-7.40’
7.30-7.20
7.50-pH was affected
neither
by duration
of lipid
infu-sion nor by the regimen of lipid infusion. In group
II,
the
mean
differences
between
infusion
and
preinfusion pH values during each day of the study
were
not statistically
significant
from
zero
(Fig
4).DISCUSSION
Since Sundstrom et a!’ reported a small and not
statistically significant decrease in
A-aDo2
values
in healthy adults who received 0.15 g/min of fat emulsion during a 20-minute period, there have been other reports. Investigations in sheep and rabbits have suggested that accumulation of tn-glycenides in the lungs was not the primary
of-]
,nHHHHH
400-fender, but that fat emulsions (or one or several of
their components) may trigger
prostaglandin-me-diated alterations of vascular tone leading to a state
of pulmonary hypertension and decreased oxygen-ation.14’6 This prostaglandin response may be
blocked by indomethacin15”7 and may be
poten-tiated by preexisting lung damage.’6 This would, of course, be of key importance in the case of very low birth weight neonates who seldom escape some
degree of pulmonary injury. Alternatively, it has
been
proposed
that
particles
of fat emulsions
may
saturate the reticuloendothelial system, by which
they are removed from circulation, may compro-mise further function of macrophages, and may thereby produce a barrier to oxygen diffusion in the lungs.16 Although the effect of higher rates of lipid
infusions are not known, infusions of as much as
4
0
r-iflflflflflfl
Fig 2. Group II only. Mean (±2 SE) alveolar-arteriolar
gradient (mm Hg) of oxygen diffusion in lungs before and
during infusion of lipids on each of eight days of study.
Corresponding rate of lipid infusion (g/kg/24 h) is shown
at top.
]
rJrJI]
Fig 4. Group II only. Mean (±2 SE) blood pH before
and during infusion of lipids on each of eight days of
study. Corresponding rate of lipid infusion (mg/kg/24 h)
is shown at top.
1
1II’
7.40
-7.30
-7.20
- = IS IS 4 2 II 7 5 6 5 13 13 13 9 7 7 3 4 3 12 12 $0 10 10 7 6 5 5Fig 3. Mean (±2 SE) blood pH before infusion on lipids and during infusion of lipids on
each of eight days of study. Corresponding rate of lipid infusion (mg/kg/24 h) is shown at
0.08 g/kg/h appear to
be compatible
with
normal
macrophage function.18
Several neonates and infants were described at
autopsy as having fat embolisms in the capillaries
of the lungs and lipid-laden macrophages.8 Dahms
and Ha1pin described three infants who had ar-tenial lipid lesions characterized by a wide foamy layer of intima partially occluding the limina of small muscular arteries in the lungs as well as by infiltration of the intima, the media, and the adven-titia by lipids. All three of these infants were very ill for weeks prior to their deaths: one had repeated episodes of septicemia, and the other two suffered from severe congenital heart disease. Other inves-tigators have reported that, under certain
circum-stances, infusion of fat emulsions resulted in
con-current decreases in Pao2 values and increases in plasma concentrations oftniglycerides.7”#{176} It is
stnik-ing that most cases of pulmonary side effects were
associated with high rates of lipid infusion, all in excess of 0.14 g/kg/h and as high as 0.70 g/kg/h. With the exception of the three infants described
by Dahms and Halpin, whose degree of illness has already been noted, only one baby of 38 received fat emulsions at a rate less than 0.17 g/kg/h and only three were exposed to a rate less than 0.25 g/ kg/h before hypoxia was noted or death occurred.
In fact,
it has been stated that fat emulsion admin-istered at rates of 0.20 g/kg/h had no effect on oxygenation of neonates weighing less than 1,500 g.1#{176}The data from our study support this conten-tion. Lipids were infused at rates as great as 0.17 g/kg/h in groups I and III and 0.25 g/kg/h in groupII without
demonstrating
any deleterious
effects
on
A-aDo2
values.
Although the rates of lipid infusion used in this
study appeared to be safe, some warnings are in
order. Very immature neonates (mostly less than
27 weeks of gestation but sometimes more mature by dates but not metabolically) may have difficul-ties clearing lipid particles from plasma and storing the particles in the reticuloendothelial system; im-paired diffusion of oxygen could conceivably occur. Small-for-dates neonates clear lipid particles less effectively and, because this group of neonates was not addressed in our study, no recommendation as to “safe” infusion rates may be made. No data on lipid tolerance of neonates with chronic lung
dis-eases, such as bronchopulmonary dysplasia, are
available. Clinically, they appear to tolerate
infu-sion rates of 4 g/kg/d without obvious problems, but caution should be observed in view of the ani-mal experience mentioned earlier in this discussion. Certainly, on the basis of our knowledge at this time, no neonate should be deprived of the caloric benefit of fat emulsions administered at a
reason-able and cautious rate.
Fat emulsions have anecdotally been blamed for producing metabolic acidosis, although supporting evidence has been conspicuously lacking. Our data suggest that pH was affected neither by the dura-tion oflipid infusion nor by the regimen of infusion.
Low
pH
values
that
were
occasionally
observed
were readily explained on the basis of the neonate’s respiratory and perfusion status. Infusion of lipids neither worsened the pH status nor delayed
recov-ery.
SPECULATION AND RELEVANCE
These data suggest that infusion of fat emulsions in appropriate for gestational age, very low birth weight neonates, at a maximal hourly rate of 0.17 or 0.25 g/kg, appears to have no deleterious effect on either diffusion of oxygen in the lungs or blood
pH.
In view
of the data
in the literature,
use of an
infusion rate of 0.17 g/kg/h (therefore infusing fat emulsion at a constant rate for the full 24-hour period) may decrease the risk of untoward side effects.
SUMMARY
Very low birth weight neonates were randomly allocated to one of three regimens of administration of fat emulsions to compare continuous v intermit-tent administration and stepwise increase of dosage V constant dosage. The effect of these various reg-imens on acid-base status and on oxygen-diffusing capacity in the lungs was particularly scrutinized. The data suggest that continuous administration of fat emulsions at a constant rate for 24 hours may be safer than intermittent infusions. Beginning at
a daily
dosage
of 4 g/kg
rather
than
increasing
the
dosage stepwise does not appear to have adverse effects on pulmonary function in appropriate for gestational age neonates. Data on other aspects of tolerance of fat emulsion must be examined before recommending this method of infusion as a safe procedure.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This work was supported, in part, by grant HD 15967
from the National Institute of Child Health and Human
Development, Bethesda, MD, and by KabiVitrum,
Berke-ley, CA.
REFERENCES
1. Sundstrom G, Zauner CW, Arborelius M: Decrease in
pul-monary diffusing capacity during lipid infusion in healthy
men. J Appi Physiol 1973;34:816-820
2. Greene HL: Effects of Intralipid on the lung, in Winters
High Risk Infant. New York, John Wiley & Sons, 1975, pp
369-380
3. Greene HL, Hazlett D, Demaree R: Relationship between
Intralipid-induced hyperlipemia and pulmonary function.
Am J Clin Nutr 1976;29:127-135
4. Brans YW: Parenteral nutrition of the very low birth weight
neonate: A critical view. Clin Perinatol 1977;4:367-376 5. Hilliard JL, Shannon DL, Hunter MA, et al: Plasma lipid
levels in preterm neonates receiving parenteral fat emul-sions. Arch Dis Child 1983;58:29-33
6. Brans YW: Erratum: Values for plasma glycerol, FFA, and
triglycerides. J Pedizztr 1984;105:855
7. Sun SC, Ventura C, Verasestakul 5: Effect of
Intralipid-induced lipaemia on the arterial oxygen tension in preterm infants. Resuscitation 1978;6:265-270
8. Barson AJ, Chiswick ML, Doig CM: Fat embolism in infancy
after intravenous fat infusions. Arch Dis Child 1978;53:218-223
9. Levene MI, Wigglesworth JS, Desai R: Pulmonary fat
ac-cumulation after Intralipid infusion in the preterm infant.
Lancet 1980;2:815-818
10. Pereira GR, Fox WW, Stanley CA, et al: Decreased
oxygen-ation and hyperlipemia during intravenous fat infusions in
premature infants. Pediatrics 1980;66:26-30
11. Dahms BB, Halpin TC Jr: Pulmonary arterial lipid deposit
in newborn infants receiving intravenous lipid infusion. J
Pediatr 1980;97:800-805
12. Dubowitz LMS, Dubowitz V, Goldberg C: Clinical
assess-ment of gestational age in the newborn infant. J Pedwtr
1970;77:1-10
13. Freeman MG, Graves WL, Thompson RL: Indigent Negro
and Caucasion birthweight-gestational age tables. Pediatrics
1970;46:9-15
14. Inwood RI, Gora P, Hunt CE: Indomethacin inhibition of Intralipid-induced lung dysfunction. Prostaglandin Med
1981;6:503-514
15. Hageman JR, McCulloch K, Gora P, et al: Intralipid
alter-ations in pulmonary prostaglandin metabolism and gas
ex-change. Grit Care Med 1983;11:794-798
16. Friedman Z, Marks KH, Maisels MJ, et al: Effect of
paren-teral fat emulsion on the pulmonary and reticuloendothelial
systems in the newborn infant. Pediatrics 1978;61:694-698
17. McKeen CR, Brigham KL, Bowers RE, et al: Pulmonary vascular effects of fat emulsion infusion in unanesthetized
sheep: Prevention by indomethacin. J Gun Invest 1978;
61:1291-1297
18. Strunk RC, Murrow BW, Thilo E, et al: Normal macrophage
function in infants receiving Intralipid by low-dose inter-mittent administration. J Pediatr 1985;106:640-645
19. Cashore WJ: Growth and transcutaneous oxygen transport
in very low birthweight infants receiving intravenous fat
emulsion: Clinical conference on pediatric nutrition: The
role of Neopham and Intralipid in TPN. Acta Paediatr
Scand 1982;517(suppl):123-134
VIEWS THAT DESERVE TO BE HEARD
I have
recently
had
occasion
to interview
15 mothers of 17 severely mentallyhandicapped
young
adults
aged
between
19 and 25 years. . . .Three
mothers
thought
all medical
means
should
be used
to keep
such
infants
alive.
. . . 12mothers
took
the
opposite
view.
. . .It is clear
that
most
of these
mothers
do
not look upon
a lifetime
spent
caring
for the severely
mentally
handicapped
as
time
well
spent,
even
though
they
love
their
children,
have
compassion
for
them,
and
want
to do the
best
for them
that
they
can.
Those
who
have
had
twenty
years’
experience
caring
for young
people
classified
as severely
mentally
handicapped
have
views
that
perhaps
deserve
to be heard
more
than
most.
Submitted by Student