Vol. 86, pp. 7113-7117, September 1989 Immunology
Primarily chronic progressive and relapsing/remitting multiple
sclerosis: Two immunogenetically distinct disease entities
(HLA class IIgenes/HLA-DR/HLA-DQ/restrictionfragment length polymorphism analysis)
OLLE
OLERUP*tf,
JAN HILLERT*§,
STENFREDRIKSON§, TOMAS OLSSON§, SLAVENKA
KAM-HANSEN§,
ERNA
MOLLERt, BJORN CARLSSON*t,
ANDJOHAN WALLIN*t
*Center for Biotechnology,tDepartmentof ClinicalImmunology,and§DepartmentofNeurology, Karolinska Institute at Huddinge Hospital, S-141 86
Huddinge,Sweden
Communicated byBarujBenacerraf,June8, 1989
ABSTRACT HLA class IIgene polymorphism was inves-tigated in 100 patients with clinically definite multiple sclerosis (MS) by restriction fragmentlength polymorphism analysis of TaqI-digested DNA using DRB, DQA, and DQB cDNA probes.
Twenty-sixpatients had primarily chronic progressive MS and 74 had relapsing/remitting MS. The latter group included patients with a secondaryprogressiveevolution of symptoms. Both clinical forms of MS were found to be associated with the DRw15,DQw6 haplotpe. In addition, primarily chronic pro-gressive MS was positivelyassociated withtheDQBlrestriction fragmentpattern seeninDR4,DQw8, DR7,DQw9, and DRw8, DQw4haplotypes,as well as
negatively
associated with the Taq IDQBIallelic pattern corresponding to the serological speci-ficity DQw7. Relapsing/remitting MS was positively associ-ated with the DQBI allelic pattern observed in theDRw17,DQw2 haplotype. These three DQB1 alleles are in strong negative linkage disequilibria with DRw15. The two susceptibility markersof each clinical form of MS act additively in determining the genetic susceptibility, as therelative risks for individualscarrying both markers roughly equal thesumof respective risks. Different alleles of theDQB1locusdefinedby restriction fragment lengthpolymorphisms contribute to
sus-ceptibilityand resistance toprimarily chronic progressive MS
as well as to
susceptibility
torelapsing/remitting
MS. The observed immunogenetic heterogeneity between the different clinical forms of MS favors the hypothesis that primarily chronicprogressive MS andrelapsing/remittingMS are two distinctdiseaseentities.Withthefinding ofastrongassociation betweenankylosing spondylitisand the HLAclassIantigenB27(1, 2),anew era
in the search forgeneticmarkers in humandiseasesbegan, and various HLA antigens have been demonstrated to be associated withsusceptibilityto alarge number of different diseases (for review,seeref. 3). Despite intense effortsthe mechanismsinvolved in theassociations betweenHLA
an-tigensanddiseases havenotbeenunraveled.
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is achronic inflammatory demy-elinating disease ofthecentralnervoussystemoften causing neurological deficits.Theetiologyaswellasmany aspectsof
the pathogenesis remain unclear. However, most current hypotheses postulate that the disease is caused by a T-cell-mediated autoimmune destruction ofthe myelinsheath
triggered byanenvironmentalinfluence, whichmaybeviral,
in thegenetically predisposed individual.
MostpatientswithMShaveadisease coursecharacterized by relapses andremissions, termed
relapsing/remitting
MS(R/R
MS).Manyofthesepatients will, however, eventually enter aphasewithsecondaryprogressive evolution ofsymp-toms (4). Approximately, 15-40%o of the patients with MS have aprimarily chronic progressive diseaseform(PCP MS)
(4, 5);i.e.,thediseasehas acontinuous progressive evolution
from onset. It has beenproposedthat PCP MS and R/R MS may be separate disease entities (6) since they differ with respect to epidemiology (6), age at onset (4, 5, 7), initial symptoms (4, 6),prognosis withregard to degreeofdisability (4, 7) andtomortality(8), and response to immunosuppres-sion(9). Effortstodifferentiate between PCP MSand R/R
MS by serological HLA class II typing have yieldeddivergent andinconclusiveresults(10-12).
Theextremely polymorphicHLAclassIIgenesbelongto theimmunoglobulingenesuperfamily andarelocatedonthe
short arm of chromosome 6 with three major subregions encoding expressed molecules-DR, DQ, and DP. HLA
class IIantigens aretransmembraneousglycoproteins com-posed ofa heavy achain anda light
A
chain. Mostof the polymorphism is found within discrete diversity regions ofthemembrane-distal domain, encoded by thesecond exon,
especially of the 3 chains (for review, see ref. 13). HLA
antigens serve as markers for self during the ontogenetic development ofthe T-cellrepertoire.HLAclassIImolecules formacomplexwithimmunogenicdeterminants, whichcan be recognized by the T-cell receptor. Thus, the antigen-specificT-cell responseis restrictedbythemajor
histocom-patibility
complex.Restrictionfragment lengthpolymorphism (RFLP) analy-sis ofHLA-DR and -DQ genes has been developed intoa
powerful
toolfor genomic tissue typing (14-17). The poly-morphism detected byRFLPanalysis correlateswell with thephenotypic polymorphism recognized by serologyand mixed
lymphocyte culture (ref. 16; for review, seeref. 18).
Addi-tional biologically relevant polymorphism is identified by
RFLPanalysiscompared toconventional serological tissue typing (ref. 16; for review, see ref. 18). Due to the strong
linkage disequilibrium between DR and DQ subregions, DR-DQ haplotypescanbeassigned by merelyinvestigating
theindividual withoutfamilydata(16-18).
Inapreliminary studywehavefound(19)thatPCP MSwas
associated with a specific heterozygous Taq I HLA-DQB restrictionfragmentpattern. Toidentifyimmunogenetic
het-erogenetiesbetween the twoclinicalformsofMS,PCP MS and
R/R
MS,
RFLPanalysis ofHLA-DRand-DQgeneswas performedinalargenumberofclinicallywellcharacterized MS patients.Abbreviations: RR, relativerisk; MS, multiple sclerosis;PCPMS, primarilychronicprogressive MS;R/RMS, relapsing/remittingMS,
including patientswithasecondary progressive phase; RFLP,
re-strictionfragment length polymorphism; Pcorr58,etc., Pcorrected byafactor of58,etc.;EF, etiologic fraction.
tTowhomreprintrequestsshouldbe addressed.
7113
Thepublicationcostsof thisarticleweredefrayed in part by page charge payment.Thisarticlemustthereforebeherebymarked"advertisement"
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Patients. One hundred unrelated Swedish patients with clinically definite MS (20) were studied. Twenty-sixpatients had PCPMS-i.e., graduallyprogressive neurological symp-tomsfrom the onset of diseasewithout remissions.
Seventy-four patients had R/R MS. This latter group includedpatients who experienced secondaryprogressiveevolution of symp-tomsafter initialrelapses and remissions. Clinical and
cere-brospinal fluid data of thepatientsaregiveninTable 1. Controls. One hundred healthy unrelated Swedes,
HLA-DR and -DQ typed by Taq I RFLP analysis,were used as
controls.
Probes. The following almost full-length cDNA probes
were used: DRB, a790-base-pair(bp) HindIII-Sac Ifragment
of clone
pII-,3-3
(23); DQA,a584-bpRsaI-Stu Ifragmentof clone pII-a-5 (24); DQB, a627-bpAva I-Ava Ifragment ofclone
pll-,8-1
(25). Purified insertswere labeled byrandom hexanucleotidepriming (Pharmacia)to a specific activity of1-2 x 109
cpm/hg.
RFLPAnalysis of HLA-DRB,-DQA, and -DQB Genes. DNA was extractedfrom peripheral blood leukocytes byphenol/ chloroform extraction ofproteinaseK-treated nuclei in mi-croscale. Samplesof
8,ug
of DNAweredigestedwith 2units of Taq I pergg
of DNA (Boehringer Mannheim) in 20-/Areaction mixtures for4 hr at 650C. Totalreaction mixtures were loaded on 0.7%agarose gels (20 x 20 cm). Gels were electrophoresed for 20 hrat40 Vin 0.5 x TBEbuffer (89mM
Trisborate/89mMboricacid/2mMEDTA, pH8.0). Dena-tured DNAfragmentswere transferredbycapillary blotting
with 20x SSC (3 M NaCl/0.3M sodiumcitrate, pH 7.0) to
nylon membranes (Pall) and cross-linkedby UV-irradiation for 3.5 min. After prehybridization for 2 hr at 420C
[50%
(vol/vol)formamide/10%(wt/vol)
dextransulfate/lOx
Den-hardt's solution/50 mM Tris-HCl, pH7.5/1
MNaCl/1%
SDS/0.1% sodiumpyrophosphate/denatured
sheared salmon sperm DNA(150,ug/ml)],
a32P-labeled cDNAprobewasadded(15-20 x106cpm permembrane). (1xDenhardt's solution = 0.02%
polyvinylpyrrolidone/0.02%
Ficoll/0.02%
bovineserumalbumin.)Filterswerehybridizedfor 12-18 hr
at 42°C. Two 5-min washes at room temperature in 2x
SSC/0.5%SDSwerefollowedbytwo30-minhigh-stringency
washes at 60°C in 0.lx SSC/0.1% SDS. Membranes were autoradiographed (X-Omat AR5, Kodak) with intensifying screens for 2-5 days at -70°C, and RFLP patterns were analyzed (16-18).
Nomenclature. Toavoid local Taq I RFLPnomenclature,
theassociated DRand DQ serological specificities (16, 18) are given whenever possible, using the nomenclature
sug-gested byTheNomenclature Committee onLeucocyte
An-tigens1987 (26). Allelic Taq I DRB, DQA, andDQBRFLP patterns frequently referred to in the text are described in
Table 1. Clinical andcerebrospinalfluid data of MSpatients
PCPMS R/RMS
Male/femaleratio 9:17 22:52
Ageatonset, years 40(20-56) 33(13-55) Duration ofdisease,years 8 (2-22) 9 (1-33) CSF
IgGindex -0.7* 23/26 54/73
Oligoclonal IgGbandst 24/26 68/73
Mononuclearpleocytosist 8/26 35/73
Twenty-six PCP MS patients and 74 R/R MS patients were
studied. Forage at onset andduration ofdisease,dataare meanand range(inparentheses).Cerebrospinalfluid(CSF)datawereavailable on99patientsand areexpressedas no.patients/no. totalpatients. *ReflectsIgG synthesiswithin the centralnervous system(21). tDemonstrated by agarose isoelectric focusing and avidin-biotin
peroxidaseimmunolabeling (22). t:5-x 106 cells per liter.
Table 2. TaqI DRBandDQBRFLPpatternspositivelyand
negativelyassociated with the different clinical forms ofMS areillustrated inFig. 1.
Statistics. Datawere
analyzed by
thex2test orby
Fisher'sexacttest, when thecriteria of thex2test were notfulfilled. When
looking
for other HLA class IIassociationsthan the well-established DR2 association, genefrequencies
of pa-tients and controls werecompared
after subtraction of T-DRB II,T-DQB II(DRwl5,DQw6)-positive
haplotypes.
Pvalues of non-DR2 associationswerecorrected(byafactor of
29, Pcorr29)
for thetotalnumberofTaqIHLA-DRB(n
= 16), -DQA (n=5),and-DQB(n=8) allelicpatternsidentifiedinCaucasiansor werecorrected
(by
afactor of19,
Pcorr19)
for the number ofTaqIDRB,DQA,andDQB
haplotypes (n
= 19) found in the healthy controls. P values were also corrected(byafactor of2,Pcorr2)for
dividing
thepatients
intotwogroups.Relative risks(RRs)andetiologic
fractions (EF)werecalculatedbymethodsdescribedinrefs. 27 and 28.RESULTS
AllMSPatients VersusHealthyControls.
Sixty
percentofpatients
(n = 100)compared
to 30% of controls had the T-DRB II pattern, whichcorresponds
to theserological
DR2-split
DRw15[P<0.00005; RR,3.5; EF,
0.43]
(Table 2;
Fig.
1, lane 1).Sixty-nine
percentofpatients
compared
to50% of controlswere T-DQB
II-positive,
which isassociatedwiththe
serological DQwl-split DQw6
(P<0.005;
RR,
2.2;
EF, 0.38)(Table
2;Fig.
1, lane 2). The T-DQB IIpattern(DQw6)
is seen inDRwl5,DQw6,Dw2
andDRw13,DQw6,
Dw18 haplotypes as well as in some very rare
haplotypes.
The
primary
RFLP-defined associationin all MSpatients
waswiththe T-DRB II pattern
(DRw1S)
and notwithT-DQB
II(DQw6)
(P<0.001).
PCP MS PatientsVersusHealthyControls. Theassociation
of PCP MS
(n
=26)
withT-DRBII(DRw15)
wasweaker than the association found in all MSpatients,
54% ofpatients
compared
to 30% ofcontrols(Pcorr2
<0.05; RR,
2.7;
EF,
0.34)
(Fig. 1,
lane1).
Nosignificant
association withT-DQB
II
(DQw6)
wasobserved(Fig.
1,lane 2).Sixty-five
percentof PCP MSpatients
compared
to38%of controls had theT-DQBIVpattern(Pcorr58
<0.05; RR,
3.1;
EF, 0.44)
(Table
2;Fig.
1, lane4). T-DQBIVinCaucasiansis found in
DR4,DQw8, DR7,DQw9,
andDRw8,DQw4
hap-lotypes (Table 2). Most of T-DQB
IV-positive
patients
be-longed
to theDR4,DQw8
haplotype-42%
of all PCP MSpatients compared
to 24% of controls(Pcorr38
<0.05; RR,
2.3; EF, 0.24). Noneof the 26
patients
compared
to29% ofcontrols were T-DQB
V-positive,
which is associated withDQw7
(Pcorr58 <0.05;
RR,0.06)
(Table 2;
Fig. 1,
lane5).
Consequently,
none of theDR4-positive haplotypes
in PCP MScompared
to31%ofDR4-positive haplotypes
incontrolshad the T-DQB V
(DQw7)
pattern(P
<0.00001).
The combined occurrence of T-DRB II
(DRwl5)
andT-DQBIV
(DQw8, DQw9,
andDQw4)
wasobserved in31%of
patients
with PCP MScompared
to 6% ofcontrols(P
<0.001; RR,
7.0).
Eighty-eight
percent ofpatients
exhibitedone or both
susceptibility
markerscompared
to 62% of controls(P
<0.05; EF, 0.70).
R/R
MS Patients VersusHealthyControls.Thestrength
of theassociationwith T-DRB II(DRwlS)
inR/R
MS(n
=74)
wasof thesame
magnitude
astheassociation found in all MSpatients-62%
ofpatients compared
to 30% of controls(Pcorr2
<0.00005;
RR,3.8; EF,
0.46)
(Fig.
1,
lane1).
Furthermore,
68% ofR/R
MSpatients
wereT-DQB
II(DQw6)-positive compared
to50%of controls(Pcorr2
<0.05;
RR,
2.2; EF, 0.37)
(Fig. 1,
lane2).
InR/R
MS,
asforall MSpatients,
theprimary
RFLP-definedassociationwaswith theT-DRB II
(DRwlS)
allelic pattern and not withT-DQB
II(DQw6)
pattern (P< 0.0005).Table 2. AllelicTaq I DRB, DQA,and DQB RFLP patterns referred to in the text and the associated serological specificities
Taq Irestrictionfragments, kb Assoc. ser. spec.*
DRB DQA DQB DRB DQA DQB DR DQ II H II 12, 2.0, 1.7, 1.4 6.5 2.5, 2.3, 1.8 DRw15 DQw6 IV IV III 11, 8.0, 4.1, 1.2 4.5 2.4, 1.5 DRw17 DQw2 VIII IV III 12, 8.0, 4.1, 1.2 4.5 2.4, 1.5 DRw17 DQw2 XII V IV 14, 5.7, 5.1, 2.7, 2.6 5.7 2.2, 2.0, 1.7 DR4 DQw8 XIII V IV 14, 5.7, 4.0, 2.7, 2.6 5.7 2.2, 2.0, 1.7 DR7 DQw9 V II IV 10,1.2 6.5 2.2, 2.0,1.7 DRw8 DQw4 - - V 2.1,1.4 DQw7
ForDRB, DQA, and DQB, local Taq Inomenclature is in Roman numerals (16). kb, Kilobases; assoc. ser. spec., associatedserological specificities.
*Data arefrom refs. 16 and 18 andO.O., unpublished data.
Thirty-two percent of R/R MS patients had the T-DQB III pattern,which isseenintheDRw17,DQw2haplotype, com-pared to15%of controls(Pcorr58<0.005; RR, 2.7;EF, 0.20)
go co 0 co cc CY Or a CY a az a a a l L ~ L P 12 2.3 2.0 1.4~ lane All MS n=100 PCP MS n=26 R/R MS n=74 Controls n- 100 2.4m 2.2 ,2.1> 2.0 1.5> 1.4> t 2 3 60%* 69% 54%* 73% 62% * 68%* 30% 50% 4 5 25% 37% 4% 65% 32%** 27% 15% 38% 14% 0%* 19% 29%
FIG. 1. TaqIDRBandDQB allelic restrictionfragmentpatterns
positivelyandnegativelyassociatedwith allMS,PCPMS, and R/R MS. Lanes: 1, Taq I-digested DNA hybridized withaDRBcDNA
probe; 2-5, Taq I-digested DNA hybridized with aDQB cDNA
probe,asindicated. To the left of eachlane, the restrictionfragments
characteristic fortheallelic patternare indicatedinkilobases. All
statisticalcomparisonsweremade withthehealthy controls.
Signif-icantdifferencesafter correctionformultiple comparisonsare
indi-cated:*,P< 0.05;**,P< 0.01;***,P<0.001.
(Table2; Fig. 1, lane 3). No negative (i.e., protective) HLA class II associationwasfound in this group of patients.
The combined occurrence of T-DRB II (DRw15) and T-DQB III(DRw17,DQw2) was found in19%of patients with
R/RMScompared to4%of controls (P<0.005; RR, 5.6).
Seventy-sevenpercentof patients had one or both
suscep-tibilitymarkers compared to 41%of controls (P< 0.00001;
EF,0.61).
PCP MS VersusR/RMS. PCP MS as well asR/RMSwere associated with T-DRB II (DRw15).
Thefrequency ofT-DQB IV(DQw8, DQw9, andDQw4), positively associated with PCPMS, is reduced in R/RMS
compared toPCP MS (P <0.001)(Table 3). Likewise, the occurrenceofT-DQB III(DRw17,DQw2) positively
associ-atedwithR/R MS is reduced inPCPMS comparedtoR/R MS (P< 0.005)(Table 3).
DISCUSSION
The familial occurrenceofMS with a tendencyofincreasing prevalence withincreasingdegreeof kinship (forreview,see
ref.29) suggests thatgeneticfactorsmaybeof importancein theetiology ofMS. In aCanadianpopulation-basedstudyof MS in twins(30),asignificantly higherconcordancerate was found in monozygotic twins compared to dizygotic twins, indicatingamajor genetic etiologiccomponent.
Theinheritance ofMSmight bepolygenic, with lociof the HLAclass IIregion contributingamajorpartofthegenetic predisposition. Linkage tothe HLAregion issupported by
many (e.g., refs. 29, 31), but not all (32, 33), studies of haplotype sharinginaffected sibling pairs. In formal
segre-gationandlinkage analysis(34), anexcellent fit wasobtained foramodelwithadominantMS determinanttightlylinkedto
the DR2 haplotype and a second unlinked determinant.
However, asonly limiteddata areavailableonthe concor-dancerateofMS inHLA-identicalsiblings,theinfluenceof non-HLA-linkedgenes isdifficulttoascertain.
The penetrance of MSin individuals carrying the associ-ated Taq I HLA-DRB and -DQB patterns islow. Thisdoesnot necessarily implythat thedisease ispolygenicorprecipitated by an environmental influence. The T-cell-receptor
a/,8
heterodimersareformedby random geneticrearrangements.
During maturationthe T cells are submittedtopositiveand
negative thymic selection controlled by theHLA antigens. Thus,the T-cellrepertoire ofanindividual isinfluencedby
stablegenetic markers,the HLA genes,andarandomgenetic
process. Thelikelihood for formation ofspecificT-cellclones
that might contribute to disease will, therefore, be
HLA-dependent. The penetrance ofdisease will depend on the
stochastic event offorming T-cellclonalrepertoires witha capacityto cause disease.
InthepresentstudyanEFof0.70is found for thepresence
ofthe RFLP-definedalleles T-DRBII(DRw15), T-DQB IV
-i MIN ',I; ."AL, AM 0 0
Table 3. Frequencies of Taq I HLA-DQB allelicrestrictionfragmentpatternscontributingto susceptibility and resistance toPCP MS compared toR/RMS
P
Frequency,t PCP MS PCP MS R/R MS
Pattern PCP MS R/RMS Controls* vs. R/RMS vs.controlst vs.controlst
T-DQB IV(DQw8,DQw9,DQw4)t 65 27 38 <0.001 <0.05 NS
T-DQB V(DQw7)§ 0 19 29 <0.01 <0.05 NS
T-DQB I1(DRw17,DQw2)1 4 32 15 <0.005 NS <0.005
NS, notsignificant. nvalues are asfollows: for PCP MS, 26; forR/RMS, 74; for controls, 100. *FrequenciesoftheMS-associatedDQB patternsin the healthy controls are given for
comparison.
tpcorrected by a factor of 58.WPositivelyassociatedwith PCP MS.
§Negatively associated withPCP MS. Positivelyassociated withR/RMS.
(DQw8, DQw9, DQw4), or bothin PCP MS, and an EF of 0.61 is found in R/R MS for the occurrence of T-DRB HI (DRw15), T-DQB III (DRw17,DQw2), or both. Thesefigures
are in good agreement with the concept that most ofthe
genetic susceptibilitytoMS isconferred bygenesintheHLA class II region.
In population studies ofMS, associations were first
ob-served with the HLAclassIantigensA3 and B7. However,
subsequentlystrongerassociations werefoundwith the class II specificities Dw2 and DR2. In most population studies of Caucasian MSpatients consistently strongassociationswith the Dw2 and DR2specificitieshavebeenobtained (ref.35;for
review, see ref. 36). A Dw2 association has also been
observed in American black MS patients. A weak DR3 association has been observed in a few studies (37). In
Arabian (38) as well as in Sardinian (39) MS patients an
association with the DR4antigen has been found. Aweak
association with the DQwl antigen (DR2 associated) was
foundinScottish MS patients (11),but this finding has not been confirmed (12, 40). An association with the DPw4
specificity has been reported inSwedish MS patients (41). However, in aNorwegian study (42), where a DPw4 asso-ciation was also observed, this was interpreted to be
sec-ondaryto aprimaryDR2association. Itis worthnotingthat inpopulation studies ofDPantigen frequencies in
Norwe-gians (43), the Dutch (44), and Danes (45), weak linkage disequilibriumbetween the DR2 and DPw4specificitieshas beenobserved.
In our MS patients, the well-known DR2 association is
confirmed(for review, seeref. 36). Inaddition, the associ-ationisfound tobe withthe RFLP pattern (T-DRB
If)
thatcorrespondstothe serological DR2-split DRw15. The three
cellularly defined specificities associated with DR2 (Dw2,
Dw12, and Dw2l) can readily be distinguished by Taq I RFLPanalysis andDRB, DQA, and DQB linkage analysis (18, 46). AllT-DRB II(DRw15)-positive patientsin our study have the Taq I RFLP patternscorrespondingtoDw2,which is in accordancewithprevious findings(35).
An association with T-DQB II, corresponding to the DQwl-split DQw6, is also observed. Based on RFLP data
this association is statistically secondary to the T-DRB II (DRw15)association (P < 0.001). However, as theprotein
sequencesof thepolymorphic amino-terminaldomain of the DRBI (for review, see ref. 13) and the DQB1 (47) gene
productsmost likely are uniquein the DRwl5,DQw6,Dw2 haplotype, it is notpossible by Taq I RFLP analysis or by
serologicalDRandDQ typingtodetermine thebiologically primary association.
Asit has beensuggestedthatPCPMS and
R/R
MSmaybedistinct diseases(6), it is ofgreatinterestto notethefinding ofpositive and negative associations with different
RFLP-definedDQBI alleles in thetwoclinical forms ofMS. InPCPMS anassociationwith T-DQBIVisfound. This RFLP pattern is seen in DR4,DQw8, DR7,DQw9, and
DRw8,DQw4 haplotypes. Theamino acid sequences ofthe
DQB chain probably differ between these three haplotypes (47). However, asignificantproportionof T-DQBIV-positive PCP MS patients exhibitTaq I DRB,DQA,andDQB RFLP patternscorrespondingtotheDR4,DQw8 haplotype (Pcorr38 <0.05). The five Dw types (Dw4, DwlO,Dw13, Dw14, and Dw15)associatedwith the serologicalspecificityDR4 cannot be separated by RFLP analysis. The distribution ofthese
cellularlydefinedspecificities is not known inPCPMS.If the
distributiondoes not markedlydiffer betweenDR4-positive
PCP MS patients and controls, it would be tempting to
assume that the observed DR4,DQw8 association might primarilybewiththe DQBI locus. However, thiswouldhave tobeconfirmed by specific sequencing.
A negative (i.e., protective) association is observed with T-DQBV(DQw7) in PCPMS.ThisTaqIDQBJallelicpattern is mainly seen in the DR4,DQw7, DRwll,DQw7, DRw12,DQw7, and DRw8,DQw7 haplotypes. The amino acid sequences ofthe first domain of the DQB chains are identical in all these haplotypes (47). However, the amino acidsequencesoftheDQA(47) and DRB(for review,seeref.
13) chains differ. Thus, one might speculate whether the protective effectmaybe conferred by theDQBJgene
prod-uct.
InR/R MSapositive associationisfoundwith T-DQB III
(DRw17,DQw2). Itisof interestto note thatnoassociation
is found with the Taq I DQB pattern seenintheDR7,DQw2 haplotype. Althoughthe RFLP patternsofthesetwo
haplo-types are different, the sequences of the membrane-distal domain oftheDQB chainsare identical(47). However,the
amino acidsequencesofthefirst domainoftheDQA chains differ (47) between the two DQw2 haplotypes, which may
explain why an association is only found with the DQB
pattern of the DRw17,DQw2 haplotype and not with the
DR7,DQw2 haplotype. No association isobservedwith the Taq I DQA RFLP pattern ofthe DRw17,DQw2 haplotype.
This DQA pattern is also found in DRwll,DQw7 and
DRw12,DQw7 haplotypes. The sequences ofthe polymor-phic domain oftheDQA chainsinthehaplotypesexhibiting
this Taq I DQA pattern areidentical(47). Furthermore, the
two RFLP patterns (T-DRB IV and T-DRB VIII; Table 2)
associated with DRw17 have identical sequences of the
secondexonof the DRBI locus (48).They differonlyin the DRB3 locus, which encodes the DRw52 specificities (49). Thus,RFLPdata obtained in the presentstudysupported by
available sequence information confirms that
R/R
MS isassociated with the specific DQA-DQB heterodimer ofthe
DRw17,DQw2 haplotype, whereneitherthesequenceofthe
DQAortheDQB chain isunique. However, it isnotpossible toexcludethat the
biologically
primary associationmight
bewith the
DRBJ
locusofDRw17,DQw2 haplotype.In the present study the well-established
DRwl5,Dw2
association in MS is confirmed. Furthermore, differentcon-tributetosusceptibility and resistancetoPCP MSaswellas to susceptibility to R/R MS. Due to the strong linkage
disequilibrium between DR and DQ subregions, it is, as
previously mentioned, not possible by RFLP analysis to
exactly determine which DR loci, DQ loci,orboth thatconfer susceptibilitytothedifferentclinical forms of MS. This issue
hastobeaddressedbysequencing of the polymorphicsecond
exon of DRBI and DQBJ genes in haplotypes positively associated with MS. Theprotective association observed in PCPMS might primarily be with the DQBJ locus.
It is of great interest to note that the differences in frequencies of the DQB RFLPpatternspositively associated with PCP MS and R/R MS are more pronounced when
comparingthe twoforms ofMS with each other than when comparing PCPandR/RMSpatients with controls(Table 3). The observed immunogenetic heterogeneity gives strong support tothehypothesis that PCP MS and R/R MSare two distinctdisease entities. This maywellprove tobe ofgreat importancewhen studying the etiology andpathogenesis of
MS andalsowhenthe effectof differenttherapeutic regimes
areevaluated.
Thisstudywassupported by grants from the Karolinska Institute; the SwedishMedical Research Council (Project 00793); 'Forenade Liv' MutualGroupLife InsuranceCompany, Sweden;theMedical Research Council of the Swedish Life Insurance Companies; the Multiple Sclerosis Foundation, Sweden; the Swedish Society for Medical Research;theSwedish SocietyofMedicine, and the Lars HiertaMemorial Foundation.
1. Schlosstein, L., Terasaki, P.T., Bluestone, R. & Pearson, G. M.(1973) N. Engl. J. Med.288,704-706.
2. Brewerton, D. A.,Caffrey,M., Hart, F. D., James, D. C. O., Nicholls,A. &Sturrock,R. D. (1973) Lancet i, 904-907. 3. Tiwari, J. L. & Terasaki, P.I. (1985) in HLA and Disease
Associations(Springer, NewYork), pp. 28-48.
4. Confavreux, C., Aimard, G. & Devic, M. (1980) Brain 103, 281-300.
5. Leibowitz, U. & Alter, M. (1970) Acta Neurol. Scand. 46, 53-70.
6. Larsen,J.P.,Kvaale,G., Riise,T.,Nyland,H. &Aarli, J. A. (1985)ActaNeurol. Scand.72, 145-150.
7. Vegans, E., Theys, P., Delmotte, P. & Carton, H. (1983) J. Neurol. 229, 155-165.
8. Poser, S.,Poser, W., Schlaf, G., Firnhaber, W., Lauer, K., Wolter, M.& Evers,P. (1986)ActaNeurol. Scand. 74, 387-392.
9. Aimard, G., Confavreux,C. &Devic,M.(1980) inProgress in Multiple Sclerosis Research,ed. Bauer,H.(Springer, Berlin), pp. 376-380.
10. Madigand, M., Oger,J. J.-F.,Fauchet,R., Sabouraud,0. & Genetet,B.(1982)J. Neurol. Sci. 53, 519-529.
11. Francis, D.A., Batchelor, J. R., McDonald, W.I., Hing, S.N.,Dodi,I.A., Fielder,H.L., Herm,J. E.C. &Downie, A. W.(1987)Brain 110,181-196.
12. Lambalgen,R. V.,Sanders,E. A. C. M. &D'Amaro,J. (1986) J.Neurol. Sci. 76, 13-21.
13. Kappes, D.& Strominger,J. L.(1988) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 57,991-1028.
14. Wake,C. T., Long,E. 0.&Mach,B.(1982) Nature (London) 300,372-374.
15. Cohen, D., Le Gall, I., Marcadet,A., Font, M.-P., Lalouel, J.-M. & Dausset, J. (1984) Proc. NatI.Acad. Sci. USA 81, 7870-7874.
16. Carlsson, B., Wallin, J., Bohme,J.&Moller,E.(1987) Hum. Immunol.20,95-113.
17. Bidwell,J. L.,Bidwell,E. A.,Laundy,G. J.,Klouda,P. T.&
Bradley,B. A. (1987) Mol. Immunol. 24,513-522. 18. Bidwell,J. L. (1988)Immunol. Today9, 18-23.
19. Olerup, O., Fredrikson, S., Olsson, T. & Kam-Hansen, S. (1987) Lancetii,327.
20. Schumacher, G., Beebe, B., Kibler, R., Kurland, L.,Kurtzke, J. F., McDowell, F., Nagler, B., Sibley, W. A.,Tourtellotte, W. W. & Willmon, T. L. (1965) Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 122, 552-568.
21. Link, H. & Tibbling, G. (1977) Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Invest. 37, 397-401.
22. Olsson, T., Kostulas, V. & Link, H. (1984) Clin. Chem. 30, 1246-1248.
23. Gustafsson, K., Wiman, K., Emmoth, E., Larhammar, D., Bohme, J., Hyldig-Nielsen, J. J., Ronne, H., Peterson, P. A.& Rask, L. (1984) EMBO J. 3, 1655-1661.
24. Schenning, L., Larhammar, D., Bill, P., Wiman, K., Jonsson, A.-K., Rask, L. & Peterson, P. A. (1984)EMBOJ. 3,447-452. 25. Larhammar, D., Schenning, L., Gustafsson, K., Wiman, K., Claesson, L., Rask, L. & Peterson, P. A. (1982) Proc. NatI. Acad. Sci. USA 79, 3687-3691.
26. WHO-HLA Nomenclature Committee (1988) Vox. Sang. 55, 119-126.
27. Woolf, B. (1955) Ann. Hum. Genet. 19, 251-253.
28. Bengtsson, B. 0. & Thomson, G. (1981) Tissue Antigens 17, 356-363.
29. Suarez, B., O'Rourke, D. & Van Eerdewegh, P. (1982) Am. J. Med. Genet. 12, 309-326.
30. Ebers, G. C., Bulman, D. E., Sadovnick, A. D., Paty, D. W., Warren, S., Hader, W., Murray, T. J., Seland, T. P., Duquette, P., Grey, T., Nelson, R., Nicolle, M. & Brunet, D. (1986) N. Engl. J. Med. 315, 1638-1642.
31. Stewart, G. J., McLeod, J. G., Basten, A. & Bashir, H. V. (1981) Hum. Immunol. 3, 13-29.
32. Ebers, G. C., Paty, D. W., Stiller, C. R., Nelson, R. F., Se-land, T. P. &Larsen, B. (1982) Lancet i, 88-90.
33. Govaerts, A., Gony, J., Martin-Mondiere, C., Poirier, J. C., Schmid, M., Schuller, E., Degos, J. D. & Dausset, J. (1985) Tissue Antigens 25, 187-190.
34. Ho, H.-Z.,Tiwari, J. L., Haile, R. W., Tersaki, P. I. & Mor-ton, N. E. (1982)Immunogenetics 15, 509-517.
35. Jersild, C., Fog, T., Hansen, G. S., Thomsen, M., Svejgaard, A. & Dupont, B. (1973)LancetH,1221-1225.
36. Tiwari, J. L. & Terasaki, P. I. (1985) in HLA and Disease Associations (Springer, New York), pp. 152-167.
37. de Moerloose, P., Jeannet,M., Martins-da-Silva, B., Werner-Favre, C., Rohr, J. & Gauthier, G. (1979) Tissue Antigens 13, 357-360.
38. Kurdi, A., Ayesh, I., Abdallat, A., Maayta, U., McDonald, W.I.,Compston, D. A. S. & Batchelor, J. R. (1977) Lancet i, 1123-1125.
39. Marrosu, M. G., Muntoni, F., Murru, M. R., Spinicci, G., Pischedda, M. P., Goddi, F., Cossu, P. & Pirastu, M. (1988) Neurology 38, 1749-1753.
40. Swingler, R. J., Kirk, P. F., Darke, C. & Compston, D. A. S. (1987) J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 50, 1153-1155. 41. 0dum, N.,Hyldig-Nielsen, J. J., Morling, N.,
Sandberg-Woll-heim, M., Platz, P. & Svejgaard, A. (1988) Tissue Antigens 31, 235-237.
42. Moen, T., Stien, R.,Bratlie,A. &Bondevik, E. (1984) Tissue Antigens 24, 126-127.
43. Moen, T., Bratlie,A., Kiss, E., Bruserud,0. & Thorsby, E. (1983) Tissue Antigens 22, 298-309.
44. Termijtelen,A., Naipal-vanden Berge,S.,Suwandi-Thung, L. & van Rood, J. J. (1985) Tissue Antigens 26, 234-242. 45. 0dum, N.,Hartzman,R.,Jakobsen, B.K.,Morling,N.,Platz,
P., Robbins,F.-M., Ryder, L. P. & Svejgaard, A. (1986) Tissue Antigens28, 105-118.
46. Lee, B.S.M., Bell, J. I., Rust, N. A. & McDevitt, H. O. (1987) Immunogenetics 26, 85-91.
47. Horn,G. T., Bugawan, T. L., Long, C. M. &Erlich, H. A. (1988) Proc.Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85, 6012-6016.
48. Todd, J. A., Bell, J. I. & McDevitt, H.0. (1987) Nature (London) 329, 599-604.
49. Tiercy, J.-M., Gorski, J., Jeannet, M. & Mach, B. (1988) Proc. Natl.Acad. Sci. USA 85, 198-202.