• No results found

X-Ray Free Electron Lasers

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "X-Ray Free Electron Lasers"

Copied!
55
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Lecture 1. Introduction.

Acceleration of charged particles

X-Ray Free Electron Lasers

Igor Zagorodnov

Deutsches Elektronen Synchrotron

TU Darmstadt, Fachbereich 18

20. April 2015

(2)

General information

Lecture: X-Ray Free Electron Lasers

Place: S2|17, room 114, Schloßgartenstraße 8, 64289 Darmstadt

Time: Monday, 11:40-13:20 (lecture), 13:30-15:10 (exercises)

1.

(07.04.14)

Introduction. Acceleration of charged particles

2.

(14.04.14)

Synchrotron radiation

3.

(05.05.14)

Low-gain FELs

4.

(12.05.14)

High-gain FELs

5.

(19.05.14)

Self-amplified spontaneous emission.

FLASH and the European XFEL in Hamburg

6.

(02.06.14)

Numerical modeling of FELs

7.

(23.06.14)

New FEL schemes and challenges

8.

(30.06.14)

Exam

(3)

General information

Lecture: X-Ray Free Electron Lasers

Literature

K. Wille, Physik der Teilchenbeschleuniger und

Synchrotron-strahlungsquellen, Teubner Verlag, 1996.

P. Schmüser, M. Dohlus, J. Rossbach, Ultraviolet and Soft X-Ray

Free-Electron Lasers, Springer, 2008.

E. L. Saldin, E. A. Schneidmiller, M. V. Yurkov, The Physics of Free

Electron Lasers, Springer, 1999.

Lecturer:

PD Dr. Igor Zagorodnov

Deutsches Elektronen Synchrotron (MPY)

Notkestraße. 85, 22607 Hamburg, Germany

phone: +49-40-8998-1802

(4)

Contents

Motivation. Free electron laser

Particle acceleration

Betatron. Weak focusing

Circular and linear accelerators

Strong focusing

RF Resonators

Bunch compressors

(5)

Motivation

Laser – a special light

monochromatic

(small bandwidth)

parallel

(tightly collimated)

coherent

(special phase relations)

The laser light allows to make

accurate interference images

(6)

gas

mirrors

energy pump

light

accelerator

undulator

bunch

Motivation

non quantized electron energy

the electron bunch is the energy

source und the lasing medium

Quantum Laser

Free electron laser (FEL)

Free electron laser

laser light

John Madey, Appl. Phys. 42,

1906 (1971)

„Light Amplification by

Stimulated Emission of

Radiation“

(7)

Motivation

no mirrors

under 100 nm

no long-term excited states for the population

inversion

(8)

Motivation

Why FEL?

(9)

Motivation

FEL as a source of X-rays

peak brilliance

[ph/(s mrad

2

mm

2

0.1% BW)]

Photon flux is the number of

photons per second within a

spectral bandwidth of 0.1%

photons

s 0.1 BW

Φ =

Brilliance

2

' '

4

xy

x y

B

π

Φ

=

Σ Σ

,

,

xy

σ σ

x e

y e

Σ =

' '

,

,

x y

σ

θ

ph

σ

θ

ph

Σ

=

(10)

Motivation

brilliant

extremely short pulses (~ fs)

ultra short wavelengths (atom

details resolution)

coherent

(holography at atom

level)

(11)

Motivation

H.Chapman et al,

Nature Physics,

2,839 (2006)

Experiment with FEL light

FEL puls

32 nm

(12)

Motivation

reconstructed

image

example structure

in 20 nm membran

1

µ

m

Experiment with FEL light

diffraction

image

H.Chapman et al,

Nature Physics,

2,839 (2006)

(13)

Motivation

data from FLASH

„High-Gain“ FEL

W. Ackermann et al, Nature Photonics

1, 336 (2007)

rad

~

el

P

N

P

rad

~

N

el

2

[

µ

J]

E

[ ]

z m

λ

[nm]

Exponential growth

(14)

Motivation

FLASH („

F

ree Electron

LAS

er in

H

amburg)

(15)

Motivation

FLASH („

F

ree Electron

LAS

er in

H

amburg)

(16)

Particle acceleration

short gain length

2

1

~

λ

γ

short radiation wavelength

2

( ) ~

g

z

L

E z

e

5 4

2

5 6

1 2

~

1

g

L

O

I

I

γ

ε σ

ε

+

Requirements on the beam

high beam energy

high peak current

low emittance

low energy energy spread

[

µ

J]

E

[ ]

(17)

Particle acceleration

2

2

2

x

x

x

xx

ε

=

ε

n x

,

=

γε

x

- the normalized emittance is

conserved during acceleration

Emittance

x

z

p

dx

x

dz

p

′ =

=

- trajectory slope

(18)

Particle acceleration

Methods of particle acceleration

The energy of relativistic particle

2 4

2 2

0

E

=

m c

+

p c

with the relativistic momentum

0

p

=

γ

m v

(

)

0.5

2

1

γ

= −

β

/

v c

β

=

can be changed in EM field

2

2

1

1

L

E

d

q

d

qU

∆ =

=

= −

r

r

r

r

F

r

E

r

(

)

L

=

q

× +

F

v B E

-19

-19

1eV=1.602 10

×

C 1V=1.602 10

×

×

J

Cockroft-Walton

generator(1930)

(19)

Particle acceleration

Daresbury, ~20MeV

Acceleration in electrostatic field

Van de Graff

accelerator

The energy capability of this sort of devices is limited

by voltage breakdown, and for higher energies one is

(20)

Particle acceleration

No pure acceleration is obtained.

The electric field exists outside the plates. This field

decelerates the particle.

Time dependent electromagnetic field!

Maxwell‘s equations (1865)

The particles are sent repeatedly through the electrostatic

field.

Acceleration to higher energy?

t

∇× = +

H

J

D

t

∇× = −

E

B

ρ

∇ =

D

0

∇ =

B

Faraday‘s law

Coulomb‘s law

absence of free magnetic poles

generelized Ampere‘s law

(21)

Particle acceleration

Betatron

RF resonators

Acceleration to higher energy?

Faraday‘s law

d

d

t

= −

E r

∫∫

B s

B

E

R

(22)

Betatron

main coils

corrector coils

yoke

vacuum chamber

beam

The magnetic field is changed in a way, that the particle circle orbit

remains constant.

The accelerating electric field appears according to the Faraday’s

law from the changing of the magnetic field.

(23)

B

E

R

Betatron

ϕ

R

d

= −

d

E r

∫∫

B s

ɺ

0

0

E

ϕ

=

E

0

0

z

B

=

B

2

2

π

RE

ϕ

= −

π

R B

ɺ

av

2

1

av

z

B

B ds

R

π

=

∫∫

ɺ

ɺ

p

ɺ

ϕ

=

qE

ϕ

2

fug

mv

F

R

ϕ

=

.

L

z

F

=

qv B

ϕ

z

p

ɺ

ϕ

= −

qRB

av

B

=

ɺ

Constant orbit condition

2

av

R

p

ɺ

ϕ

= −

q

B

ɺ

Centrifugal force

Is equal to the Lorentz force

From Faraday’s law

From Newton’s law

=

p

ɺ

F

x

y

(24)

Betatron. Weak focusing

Betatron oscillations near the reference orbit

z

z

B

R

n

B

r

= −

- field index

0

< <

n

1

- orbit stability condition

Transverse oscillations are called betatron oscillations for all

accelerators.

(25)

Betatron. Weak focusing

2

2

0

(

)

1

1

fug

mv

mv

r

r

F

R

r

F

R

r

R

R

R

ϕ

ϕ

+ ∆ =

=

+ ∆

0

fug

( )

L

( )

z

F

=

F

R

= −

F R

= −

qv B

ϕ

0

(

)

(

)

[

( )

z

]

(1

)

L

z

z

B

r

F R

r

qv B R

r

qv B R

r

F

n

r

R

ϕ

ϕ

+ ∆ =

+ ∆ ≈

+

∆ = −

0

(

)

(

1)

rad

L

fug

r

F

R

r

F

F

F

n

R

+ ∆ =

+

=

<

The radial force is pointed to the design orbit if

Radial stability

ϕ

R

+ ∆

r

z

B

R

n

= −

(26)

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

field index

t[mks]

-1

0

1

-1

-0.5

0

0.5

1

orbit

x[m]

y

[m

]

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.9

1

1.1

1.2

relative radius

t[mks]

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

1

1.05

1.1

1.15

1.2

relative moment

Betatron. Weak focusing

(27)

Betatron. Weak focusing

0

r

z

z

B

B

z

r

=

=

0

(

)

(

)

r

z

z

r

B

B

z

F

z

qv B

z

qv

z

qv

z

F n

z

r

R

ϕ

ϕ

ϕ

∆ = −

∆ ≈ −

∆ = −

∆ = −

0

n

>

0

(

)

(

1)

rad

r

F

R

r

F

n

R

+ ∆ =

0

(

)

z

z

F

z

F n

R

∆ = −

n

>

0

1

n

<

The vertical force is pointed to the design orbit if

The orbit is stable in all directions if

< <

Vertical stability

(

)

L

=

q

× +

F

v B E

t

µ

∇× =

+

B

J

D

(28)
(29)

Circular and linear accelerators

Circular accelerators: many runs

through small number of cavities.

(30)

Strong focusing

BESSY II, Berlin

PETRA III, Hamburg

S. Kahn, Free-electron

lasers. (a tutorial review)

Journal of Modern Optics

(31)

Strong focusing

multipolar expansion

equations of motion

transfer matrix (quadrupole)

(32)
(33)

RF Resonators

Maxwell equations in vacuum

0

∇ =

E

0

µ

∇× = −

E

H

ɺ

0

ε

∇× =

H

E

ɺ

From

∇×∇× = ∇∇ − ∇

2

F

F

F

follows wave equations

2

2

1

0

c

∇ −

E

E

ɺɺ

=

We separate the periodical time dependance und use the

representation (traveling wave)

0

∇ =

H

2

2

1

0

c

H

H

ɺɺ

=

(

)

( , )

t

( )

e

i

ω

t k z

z

=

E r

E r

x

 

=

 

r

x

y

 

 

=

 

r

Waveguides

(34)

RF Resonators

2

( )

k

c

( )

0

E r

+

E r

=

H r

( )

+

k

c

2

H r

( )

=

0

2

2

2

c

z

k

=

k

k

k

=

ω

/

c

For the space field distribution in transverse plane we obtain

The smallest wave number (cut frequency) k

c

Wave propagation in the waveguide is possible only if k>k

c

.

If k<k

c

then the solution exponentially decays along z.

k

2

2

z

c

k

=

k

+

k

2

2

1

c

ph

z

z

z

k

ck

v

c

c

k

k

k

ω

=

=

=

+

>

Phase velocity is larger than the

light velocity

Waveguides

c

(35)

RF Resonators

Unlike free space plane wave the waves in waveguides

have longitudinal components

(

)

0

sin

sin

,

0.

z

i

t k z

z

z

m x

m y

E

E

e

a

b

H

ω

π

π

=

=

(

)

0

(

) cos(

)

,

0.

z

i

t k z

z

m

c

z

E

E J

k r

m

e

H

ω

ϕ

=

=

TM waves

( ) 0

cos

cos

,

0.

z i t k z z

m x

m y

H

H

e

a

b

E

ω

π

π

=

=

(

)

0

(

) cos(

)

,

0.

z

i

t k z

z

m

c

H

H J

k r

m

e

E

ω

ϕ

=

=

TE waves

2 2 2

,

1, 2,...;

1, 2,...

c

m

n

k

m

n

a

b

π

π

=

+

=

=

,

0,1, 2,...;

1, 2,...

mn c

x

k

m

n

a

=

=

=

J

m

(

x

mn

)

=

0

′ ′ =

Waveguides

(36)

RF Resonators

(37)

RF Resonators

The cylindrical waveguide were an ideal accelerator structure, if it were

possible to use E

z

component of TM wave. However the velocity of the

particle is always smaller than the wave phase velocity v

ph

.

waveguide with irises

(traveling waves)

RF resonators

(standing waves)

(38)

RF Resonators

Through tuning of phase velocity according to the particle velocity it is

possible to obtain, that the bunches synchronously with TM wave fly

and obtain the maximal acceleration.

Waveguide with irises (traveling wave)

z

k

k

waveguide

with irises

cylindrical

waveguide

ph

v

<

c

ph

v

=

c

2L

π

L

(39)

RF Resonators

Acceleration with standing and traveling waves

mode

(40)

RF Resonators

We separate only the periodic time dependence

and take the represantation (standing wave)

( , )

t

=

( )

e

i t

ω

E r

E r

( , )

t

=

( )

e

i t

ω

H r

H r

2

( )

k

( )

0

E r

+

E r

=

2

( )

k

( )

0

H r

+

H r

=

For the space field distribution we obtain

mode

(41)

RF Resonators

0

( )

0

z

E

=

E r

0

( )

0

H

ϕ

=

H r

2

2

2

E

z

E

z

k E

z

0

r r

r

+

+

=

( )

0

0

z

E

=

E J

kr

2.405

.

k

R

=

( )

0

1

E

H

J kr

c

ϕ

=

TM

010

-Welle

Pillbox

(42)

RF Resonators

The electron beam energy is

converted in RF energy.

Klzstron

Strahl

P

=

η

UI

klystron efficiency (45-65%)

η

Klystron

(43)

RF Resonators

The exact resonance frequency could be tuned. The resonator

is exited through an inductive chain. The waveguide from

(44)

RF Resonators

the concept of

wake fields

is used to describe the integrated

kick (caused by a source particle, seen by an observer

particle)

self field of cavity

(driven by bunches)

short range wakes describe interaction of particles in same

bunch long range wakes describe multi bunch interactions

important for FELs:

longitudinal single bunch wakes

change

the energy chirp and

interfere with bunch compression

(45)
(46)

Bunch compressors

0

s

δ

(

2

3

)

1

0

0

56

566

5666

s

= + ∆ = −

s

s

s

R

δ

+

T

δ

+

U

δ

(47)

Bunch compressors

M. Dohlus et al.,Electron Bunch Length

Compression, ICFA Beam Dynamics

Newsletter, No. 38 (2005) p.15

(48)

Phase space linearization

In accelerator modules the energy of the electrons is

increased from 5 MeV (gun) to 1200 MeV (undulator).

1,1

1,1

cos(

1,1

)

E

eV

ks

ϕ

=

+

FLASH

1,3

1,3

cos(3

1,3

)

E

eV

ks

ϕ

=

+

2

2

1

2

cos(

)

E

eV

ks

ϕ

=

+

3

3

cos(

2

3

)

E

eV

ks

ϕ

∆ =

+

(49)

Phase space linearization

In compressors the peak current I is increased from 1.5-50 A

(gun) to 2500 A (undulator).

(

2

3

)

56

566

5666

i

s

R

δ

T

δ

U

δ

∆ = −

+

+

FLASH

(50)

Phase space linearization

rollover compression vs. linearized compression

~ 1.5 kA

~2.5 kA

Q=1 nC

Q=0.5 nC

(51)

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2

Phase space linearization

Gun

1 ,1

M

M

1 ,n

M

2

M

3 1

B C

B C

2

Longitudinal dynamics(exercise 3)

(

1,1

)

1,3

(

1,3

1,1

)

1,3

2 2

1,3

3

1,3

1,3

1,1

1,3

1,3

cos( )

cos(3

)

cos

3

sin

0.5

9

cos(

)

(

)

V

V

ks

V

ks

V

V

V

ks

V

V

k s

O s

ϕ

ϕ

ϕ

ϕ

=

+

+

+

+

+

1,3

1,3

1,1

3

1,1

1,3

1

9

(

)

V

V

V

V

V

O s

ϕ

=

π

=

+

1,1

( )

max

V s

V

(52)

Phase space linearization

Gun

1 ,1

M

M

1 ,n

M

2

M

3 1

B C

B C

2

Longitudinal dynamics(exercise 3)

(53)

Phase space linearization

Gun

1 ,1

M

M

1 ,n

M

2

M

3 1

B C

B C

2

Zagorodnov I., Dohlus M.,

A Semi-Analytical

Modelling of Multistage

Bunch Compression with

Collective Effects, Phys.

Rev. ST Accel. Beams,

14, 014403 (2011)

(54)

Outlook

FLASH („

F

ree Electron

LAS

er in

H

amburg)

(55)

Outlook

FLASH („

F

ree Electron

LAS

er in

H

amburg)

undulator

References

Related documents

These results are analogous to those obtained when ex- cess quantities of L-thyroxine are added to serum (3), but the molar concentration of L-triiodo- thyronine required to produce

Our gene expression pro fi ling indi- cates that HopAM1 induces an ETI response in the Bur-0 ac- cession, which supports rapid HopAM1-induced cell death; Figure 4 HopAM1 induces

To summarize the results of this study, although the isolated lo- cal recurrence rate was higher in the patients who underwent BCS than in those who underwent a total mastectomy,

(b) Quasiparticle (QP) and excitonic energy gaps of polyyne against the reciprocal of the number n of primitive cells in the supercell as obtained us- ing different methods. The

For each Alaskan port city, we construct a variety of measures used to estimate halibut and sablefish revenue flows through processors, vessel owners and fish landings.. Table

Int ,I DH BioI J6 143 150 (1992) 143 Control of microtubule nucleating activity in the cytoplasm of maturing mouse oocytes ANNE VAN CAUWENBERGE" and HENRI ALEXANDRE',' ILaboratory

Numerous states have expanded public financing for low income adults, including parents, either through reforms in direct public coverage (e.g., Medicaid or SCHIP waiver

S. «Heat Engineering», Dnipropetrovsk National University of Railway Transport named after Academician V. «Heat Engineering», Dnipropetrovsk National University of Railway