• No results found

3. Soft g ∗ s -closed and Soft g ∗ s -open Mappings

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "3. Soft g ∗ s -closed and Soft g ∗ s -open Mappings"

Copied!
5
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

ISSN: 2347-1557

Available Online: http://ijmaa.in/

Appli

tio ca

•I ns

SS N:

47 23

55 -1

7

Interna s

International Journal of Mathematics And its Applications

Soft g s -closed Mappings in Soft Topological Spaces

Research Article

M.Suraiya Begum1∗ and M.Sheik John1

1 Department of Mathematics, NGM College, Pollachi, Tamilnadu, India.

Abstract: Soft set theory was first proposed by Molodtsov [7] in 1999 as a general mathematical tool for dealing with not clearly defined objects. Modern topology depends strongly on the ideas of soft set theory.This prompted us to define soft gs-closed and soft gs-open mappings on soft topological spaces.

MSC: 54A40, 06D72.

Keywords: Soft Topological Spaces, Soft Closed, Soft Generalized Closed, Soft gs-closed set, Soft gs-closed mapping.

c

JS Publication.

1. Introduction

The soft set theory is a rapidly processing field of mathematics. Molodtsov [7] shown several applications of this theory in solving many practical problems in economics, engineering, social science, medical science, and so on. In 2010 Muhammad shabir, Munazza Naz [8] used soft sets to define a topology namely Soft topology. Soft generalized closed set was introduced by K.Kannan [4] in 2012. The investigation of generalized closed sets has led to several new and interesting concepts like new covering properties and new separation axioms. Some of these separation axioms have been found to be useful in computer science and digital topology. In this paper we defined soft g*s - closed mapping, soft g*s - open mapping and a detailed study of some of its properties in soft topological spaces.

2. Preliminaries

Throughout this paper, ( ˜X, τ, E) or ˜X denotes the soft topological spaces ( STS in short). For a subset AE of ˜X, the closure, the interior and the complement of AE are denoted by cl(AE), int(AE) and AcE respectively. We recall some basic definitions that are used in the sequel.

Definition 2.1 ([6]). Let ˜X be an initial universal set and E be the set of parameters. Let P ( ˜X) denote the power set of X and A ⊆ E. The pair F˜ E is called a soft set over ˜X, where F is a mapping given by F : A → P ( ˜X).

Definition 2.2 ([6]). A soft set FE over ˜X is said to be

(a). A null soft set, denoted by φ, if ∀ e ∈ E, F (e) = φ.

(b). An absolute soft set, denoted by ˜X, if ∀ e ∈ E, F (e) = ˜X.

E-mail: [email protected]

(2)

The soft sets FE over an universe ˜X in which all the parameters of the set E are same is a family of soft sets, denoted by SS( ˜X)E.

Definition 2.3 ([8]). Let τ be the collection of soft sets over ˜X, then τ is said to be a soft topology on ˜X if

(a). φ, ˜X are belongs to τ.

(b). The union of any number of soft sets in τ belongs to τ.

(c). The intersection of any two soft sets in τ belongs to τ.

In this case the triplet ( ˜X, τ, E) is called a soft topological space over ˜X. and any member of τ is known as soft open set in X. The complement of a soft open set is called soft closed set over ˜˜ X.

Definition 2.4 ([4]). Let ( ˜X, τ, E) be a soft topological space over ˜X and (F, E) be a soft set over ˜X. Then

(a). soft interior of a soft set FE is defined as the union of all soft open sets contained in FE. Thus int(FE) is the largest soft open set contained in FE.

(b). soft closure of a soft set FE is the intersection of all soft closed super sets FE. Thus cl(FE) is the smallest soft closed set over X which contains F˜ E.

We denote interior(resp. closure) of a soft set FE as int(FE) (resp. cl(FE)).

Definition 2.5 ([1]). A subset FE of a soft topological space ( ˜X, τ, E) is called

(a). soft generalised closed (briefly g-closed) [1] if cl(AE) ˜⊆ UE Whenever AE ⊆ U˜ E and U is soft open ˜X.

(b). soft generalized-semi closed (soft gs-closed) if scl(AE) ˜⊆ UE whenever AE ⊆ U˜ E and UE is soft open in ˜X.

(c). soft semi-generalised closed (briefly soft sg-closed) [9] AE ⊆ U˜ E and UE is soft semiopen in ˜X. Every soft semi closed set is soft sg-closed.

(d). soft generalised α-closed (briefly soft gα-closed) [3] if α − cl(AE) ˜⊆ UE whenever AE ⊆ U˜ E and U is soft α-open in ˜X.

Definition 2.6 ([2]). Let ( ˜X, τ, E) be a soft topological space, FE and GE be soft closed sets in ˜X such that FE ∩ G˜ E= φ.

If there exist soft open sets AE and BE such that FE ⊆ A˜ E, GE ⊆ B˜ E and AE ∩ B˜ E = φ then ˜X is called a soft normal space.

Definition 2.7 ([9]). Let ( ˜X, τ, E) be an STS and FE be a subset of ˜X. The set FE is said to be soft g*s - closed if scl(FE) ˜⊆ UE whenever FE ⊆ U˜ E and UE is soft gs- open set.

Definition 2.8 ([9]). Let AE be a soft set in STS. Then soft gs- closure and soft gs-interior of AE are ddefined as follows:

(a). g*s cl(AE) = ˜T{BE: BE is sof t g*s - closed set and AE ⊆ B˜ E}

(b). g*s int(AE) = ˜S{CE : CE is sof t g*s - open set and CE ⊆ A˜ E}

Definition 2.9 ([1]). A function f : ( ˜X, τ, E) → ( ˜Y , τ0, E) is said to be soft continuous if f−1(GE) is soft open in ( ˜X, τ, E) for each soft open set GE of ( ˜Y , τ0, E).

(3)

3. Soft g s -closed and Soft g s -open Mappings

In this section we exhibit the concept of soft gs - closed and soft gs- open mappings and study some of its properties in soft topological spaces.

Definition 3.1. A mapping f : ( ˜X, τ, E) → ( ˜Y , τ0, E) is said to be soft g*s - closed mapping if for each soft closed set AE

of ˜X, f (AE) is soft gs closed set in ˜Y and is called soft g*s open mapping if for each soft open set BE of ˜X, f (BE) is soft gs open in ˜Y .

Theorem 3.2. Evert soft closed mapping is soft gs closed mapping.

Proof. Let f : ( ˜X, τ, E) → ( ˜Y , τ0, E) be a soft closed mapping. Let AEbe a soft closed set in ˜X. Then f (AE) is soft closed in ˜Y . Since every soft closed set is soft gs closed, f (AE) is soft gs closed. Hence f is soft gs closed mapping.

Theorem 3.3. Every soft gs closed mapping is soft g closed mapping.

Proof. Let f : ( ˜X, τ, E) → ( ˜Y , τ0, E) be a soft gs closed mapping and let VE be a soft closed set in ˜X. Then f (VE) is soft gs closed set in ˜Y . Since every soft gs closed set is soft g closed, f (VE) is soft g closed.

Theorem 3.4. Every soft gs closed mapping is soft gs closed mapping.

Proof. Let f : ( ˜X, τ, E) → ( ˜Y , τ0, E) be a soft gs closed mapping and let VE be a soft closed set in ˜X. Then f (VE) is soft gs closed set in ˜Y . Since every soft gs closed set is soft gs closed, f (VE) is soft gs closed.

Theorem 3.5. Every soft gs closed mapping is soft gα closed mapping.

Proof. Let f : ( ˜X, τ, E) → ( ˜Y , τ0, E) be a soft gs closed mapping and let VE be a soft closed set in ˜X. Then f (VE) is soft gs closed set in ˜Y . Since every soft gs closed set is soft gα closed, f (VE) is soft gα closed.

Theorem 3.6. Every soft gs closed mapping is soft sg closed mapping.

Proof. Let f : ( ˜X, τ, E) → ( ˜Y , τ0, E) be a soft gs closed mapping and let VE be a soft closed set in ˜X. Then f (VE) is soft gs closed set in ˜Y . Since every soft gs closed set is soft sg closed, f (VE) is soft sg closed.

The converse of the above theorems may not be true as seen from the following counter examples.

Example 3.7. Let ˜X = {x1, x2, x3} = ˜Y and E = {e1, e2, e3}. Then τ = {φ, ˜X, (F, E)} is a soft topological space over ˜X, τ0= {φ, ˜Y , (G, E)} is a soft topological space over ˜Y . Now the soft sets over ˜X and ˜Y are defined as follows: F1(e1) = {x1}, F1(e2) = {x1}, F2(e1) = {x2}, F2(e2) = {x2}, F3(e1) = {x1, x2}, F3(e2) = {x1, x2}. G1(e1) = {x1}, G1(e2) = {x1}, G2(e1) = {x1, x2}, F2(e2) = {x1, x2}, G3(e1) = {x2, x3}, G3(e2) = {x2, x3}. If the mapping f : ( ˜X, τ, E) → ( ˜Y , τ0, E) is defined as f (x1) = x1, f (x2) = x3, f (x3) = x2. Considering the soft set A1(e1) = {x3}, A1(e2) = {x3}, it is clear that f is soft gs-closed mapping but not soft closed mapping.

Example 3.8. From the above Example, Considering the soft set A1(e1) = {x1}, A1(e2) = {x1}, it is clear that f is soft g-closed mapping but not soft gs closed mapping.

Example 3.9. Let X = {x˜ 1, x2, x3} = Y and E = {e˜ 1, e2, e3}. Then τ = {φ, ˜X, (F, E)} is a soft topological space over X, τ˜ 0 = {φ, ˜Y , (G, E)} is a soft topological space over Y . Now the soft sets over ˜˜ X and ˜Y are defined as follows:

F1(e1) = {x2}, F1(e2) = {x1}, F2(e1) = {x2}, F2(e2) = {x2}, F3(e1) = {x2, x3}, F3(e2) = {x2, x3}. G1(e1) = {x1}, G1(e2) = {x1}, G2(e1) = {x2, x3}, F2(e2) = {x2, x3}, G3(e1) = {x3}, G3(e2) = {x3}. If the mapping f : ( ˜X, τ, E) →

(4)

( ˜Y , τ0, E) is defined as f (x1) = x2, f (x2) = x3, f (x3) = x2. Considering the soft set H1(e1) = {x1}, H1(e2) = {x1}, and the soft set B1(e1) = {x1, x3}, B1(e2) = {x1, x3}, it is clear that f is soft gαclosed, gs closed and sg closed mapping but not soft gs-closed mapping .

Theorem 3.10. If f : ( ˜X, τ, E) → ( ˜Y , τ0, E) is a soft closed mapping and g : ( ˜Y , τ0, E) → ( ˜Z, τ00, E) is soft gs closed mapping then g ◦ f : ( ˜X, τ, E) → ( ˜Z, τ00, E) is a soft gs closed mapping.

Proof. Let AE be soft closed in ˜X. Then f (AE) is soft closed in ˜Y , since f is soft closed mapping. Now g(f (AE)) is a soft gs closed set in ˜Z, since g is soft gs closed mapping. Hence g ◦ f : ( ˜X, τ, E) → ( ˜Z, τ00, E) is soft gs closed mapping.

Example 3.11. Let X =˜ Z = {x˜ 1, x2, x3}, Y = {x˜ 1, x2, x3, x4} and E = {e1, e2}. Then τ = {φ, ˜X, (F, E)} is a soft topological space over X, τ˜ 0= {φ, ˜Y , (G, E)} is a soft topological space over Y and τ˜ 00= {φ, ˜Z, (H1, E), (H2, E)} is a soft topological space over Z. Here (F, E) is a soft set over ˜˜ X, (G, E) is a soft set over ˜Y and (H1, E), (H2, E) are soft sets over ˜Z defined as follows: F (e1) = {x1}, F (e2) = {x1}, G(e1) = {x1, x3}, G(e2) = {x1, x3}. H1(e1) = {x3}, H1(e2) = {x3}, H2(e1) = {x1, x2}, H2(e2) = {x1, x3}. If the mapping I : ( ˜X, τ, E) → ( ˜Y , τ0, E) and f : ( ˜Y , τ0, E) → ( ˜Z, τ00, E) defined as f (x1) = x1, f (x2) = f (x4) = x2, f (x3) = x3. It is clear that each of I and f is soft gs-closed mapping but f ◦ I is not soft gs-closed, since (f ◦ I)−1(H1, E) = {{x3}, {x3}} is not a soft closed set over ˜X.

Theorem 3.12. A mapping f : ( ˜X, τ, E) → ( ˜Y , τ0, E) is soft gs closed mapping if and only if for each subset FE of ˜Y and for each soft pen set GE containing f−1(FE) there is a soft gs open set HEof ˜Y such that FE⊆H˜ E and f−1(HE) ˜⊆GE.

Proof. Suppose f is a soft gs closed mapping and let FE be a soft subset of ˜Y and GE be soft open set of ˜X such that f−1(FE) ˜⊆GE. Then HE= ˜Y −f ( ˜X −GE) is a soft gs open set containing FEsuch that f−1(HE) ˜⊆GE. Conversely, suppose FEis soft closed in ˜X. Then f−1( ˜Y − f (FE)) ˜⊆ ˜X − FE, ˜X − FEis soft open in ˜X. By hypothesis, there is a soft gs open set VEof ˜Y such that ˜Y −f (FE) ˜⊆VEand f−1(VE) ˜⊆ ˜X −FE⇒ FE⊆ ˜˜X −f−1(VE) ⇒ ˜Y −VE⊆f (F˜ E) ˜⊆f ( ˜X −f−1(VE)) ˜⊆ ˜Y −VE⇒ f (FE) = ˜Y − VE. Since ˜Y − VE is a soft gs closed set in ˜Y , f (FE) is soft gs closed set in ˜Y .

Theorem 3.13. If a bijective mapping f : ( ˜X, τ, E) → ( ˜Y , τ0, E) is soft gs closed and HE = f−1(KE) for some soft closed set KE of ˜Y , then f : HE → ( ˜Y , τ0, E) is soft gs closed.

Proof. Let FE be a soft closed set in HE. Then there exists a soft closed set GE in ˜X such that FE = HE ∩ G˜ E ⇒ f (FE) = f (HE ∩ G˜ E) = f (GE) ˜∩ KE. Since f is soft g ∗ s closed, f (GE) is soft gs closed in ˜Y . Then f (GE) ˜∩ KE is soft gs closed ⇒ f (FE) is soft gs closed.

Theorem 3.14. If f : ( ˜X, τ, E) → ( ˜Y , τ0, E) is soft continuous, soft gs closed map from a soft normal space ˜X onto a soft space ˜Y , then ˜Y is soft normal.

Proof. Let AE, BE be disjoint soft closed sets of ˜Y . Then f−1(AE), f−1(BE) are disjoint soft closed sets of ˜X. Since ˜X is soft normal, there are disjoint soft open set UE, VE of ˜X such that f−1(AE) ˜⊆ UE and f−1(BE) ˜⊆ VE. By hypothesis, there exists soft gs closed sets CE, DE in ˜Y such that AE ⊆ C˜ E and BE ⊆ D˜ E and f−1(CE) ˜⊆ UE, f−1(DE) ˜⊆ VE. Since UE and VE are disjoint, int(CE) and int(DE) are also soft open sets. Since CE is soft gs open, AE is soft closed, AE⊆ C˜ E ⊆ int(C˜ E) also BE ⊆ int(D˜ E). Hence ˜Y is soft normal.

References

[1] I.Arockiarani and A.A.Lancy, Generalized soft gβ-closed sets and soft gsβ-closed sets in soft topological spaces, Interna- tional journal of Mathematics Archive, 4(2013), 1-7.

(5)

[2] A.Aygunoglu and H.Aygun, Some Notes on Soft Topological Spaces, Neural Comput. and Applic., 21(1)(2012), 113-119.

[3] S.Hussain and B.Ahmad, Some Properties of Soft Topological Spaces, Comput.Math.Appl., 62(2011), 4058-4067.

[4] K.Kannan, Soft Generalized Closed Sets in Soft Topological Spaces, Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 37(1)(2012), 17-21.

[5] J.Mahanta and P.K.Das, On soft topological space via semiopen and semiclosed soft sets, arXiv:1203.4133v1 [math.GN]

16 mar (2012).

[6] P.K.Maji, R.Biswas and A.R.Roy, Soft set theory, Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 45(2003), 555-562.

[7] D.Molodtsov, Soft set Theory-First results, Comput. Math. Appli., 37(1999), 19-31.

[8] M.Shabir and M.Naz, On soft topological spaces, Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 61(2011), 1786-1799.

[9] M.Suraiya Begum and M.Sheik John, Soft g*s closed sets in soft topological spaces, International Journal of Scientific Research and Education, 4(2016), 5466-5470.

[10] M.Suraiya Begum and M.Sheik John, Soft g*s - continuous and soft g*s - irresolute functions in soft topological spaces, International Journal of Mathematics Trends and Technology(accepted).

[11] S.Yuksel, Z.Guzel Ergul and N.Tozlu, On Soft Compactness and Soft Separation Axioms, Applied Mathematics and Information Sciences, (2013).

References

Related documents

There are a number of interesting findings in the paper. For one, the large differences in central versus local government expenditure and revenue changes that were evident during

Ten states explicitly refer to a right of individual privacy in their state constitutions 20 7 and unlike those in federal constitution, the rights guaranteed by

This study included 49 metal workers exposed to lead occupationally and 50 unexposed administrative workers (controls) who underwent immunological analysis for cytokines (IL-6,

The need for legal certainty in competition law supports thus an argument that the UOKiK President should enjoy wide discretion in accepting commitments allowing the authority

no correlation with mycotoxin levels – higher concentrations of mycotoxins were in rye samples in 2012.. Twarużek et

These not only influence general learn- ing and behavioral responses of the scent detection dogs but also affect performance on specific tasks necessary for the dogs to complete

[8] Oxidative stress is a metabolic process of imbalance between prooxidants and antioxidants favoring abundance and overbearing effects of the prooxidants; it causes disruption